Classification and recent advances in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is a heterogeneous group of diseases comprising acute interstitial pneumonia, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and usual interstitial pneumonia (IPF/UIP). We review the clinicopathological spectrum of IIP and introduce recent advances in classification, treatment, and prognosis. BOOP can be clinically categorized as an interstitial pneumonia, though prominent granulation tufts are seen in the airspaces. Though differences between the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and other lips can be histopathologically clarified, the focus of clinical research on NSIP is differentiation from BOOP, or from IPF and UIP. IIP can be categorized into two groups: groups with acute or subacute lung injuries or fibrosis, such as in acute interstitial pneumonia, BOOP and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and groups with chronic injuries or fibrosis, such as IPF/UIP. This classification accords well with the maturity of fibrosis, CT findings, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell findings, and prognosis. The most critical problem is the treatment of IPF/UIP, because of its high mortality.     

Correlations of histologic classification with clinical features and prognosis in interstitial lung disease associated with collagen disease]

We studied 32 patients with interstitial pneumonia associated with collagen disease. All underwent surgical lung biopsy. Twenty-seven were histologically classified as follows: 8 with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), 10 with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), 6 with bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), and 3 with diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). Twenty-five of the patients were treated with corticosteroid but 4 (3 DAD, 1 NSIP) deteriorated rapidly and died within a month after lung biopsy. At the final follow-up, all 8 UIP patients were alive with residual respiratory impairment, whereas 6 NSIP and 4 BOOP patients had almost completely recovered. These findings suggested that histologic classification can be highly valuable to the therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis in cases of interstitial pneumonia associated with collagen disease.     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) represents one histologic subtype of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). NSIP is typified by temporal homogeneity and less profusion of fibroblastic foci than is seen with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), the most common IIP. Clinically patients with NSIP present with similar symptoms (cough and dyspnea) when compared to patients with UIP. The duration of these symptoms prior to presentation is variable. The finding of fever may be more common in NSIP and clubbing may be more common in UIP; however, both findings can be seen in either UIP or NSIP. Physiological findings typically demonstrate a restrictive ventilatory defect with decreased gas transfer; little difference exists between UIP and NSIP. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans are more likely to show honeycombing with UIP and a ground-glass pattern with NSIP, however, either of these findings can be seen with UIP or NSIP. The most striking differential feature between NSIP and UIP is the markedly better prognosis for patients with NSIP, a finding that cannot be explained by baseline differences in physiology or radiographic features. In this article we explore the clinical, physiological, and radiographic features of NSIP. We also review available information regarding response to therapy and prognosis.     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia: comparison of the clinicopathologic features and prognosis

Background

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) has recently been proposed as a histologic type of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), but its broad spectrum of clinicopathologic findings and variable prognosis are poorly understood. It is particularly unclear how NSIP and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) are related. The present study investigated the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of NSIP, and its differential diagnosis from UIP.

Methods

The clinicopathologic findings and prognosis in 21 NSIP and 18 UIP patients who underwent surgical or video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy were reviewed.

Results

NSIP was more frequent in women and showed nonspecific clinical manifestations. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) demonstrated ground-glass, net-like, and patchy attenuation in both lungs. Semiquantitative HRCT showed a median fibrosis score of 3 (range, 0 to 7) in NSIP patients and 5 (range, 2 to 7) in UIP patients (P<0.01). On histopathologic examination, NSIP cases were heterogeneous and the findings could be categorized into cellular and fibrosing patterns. The mean age of the NSIP and UIP patients was 48 and 60 years, respectively. The frequencies of fibroblast foci, myogelosis, honeycomb lesions, and pulmonary structural destruction in NSIP and UIP patients were 16.7% and 100% (P<0.001), 22.2% and 85.7% (P<0.05), 16.7% and 92.9% (P<0.001), and 27.8% and 100% (P<0.05), respectively. The responses to glucocorticoid treatment and the prognosis were significantly greater in NSIP than those in UIP.

Conclusions

NSIP was difficult to be differentiated from UIP by general clinical manifestations, but HRCT can be helpful for this purpose. Definitive diagnosis depends on the results of surgical lung biopsy.     

Bronchoalveolar lavage in fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in differentiating usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) from non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and in predicting the prognosis in fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). A retrospective review of 122 patients (age 58+/-8 years, 70 male) with UIP (n=87) and NSIP (n=35) was carried out. Prior to surgical lung biopsy, all of them underwent BAL and high-resolution-computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. Neutrophil count in BAL fluid was higher in UIP (7.0%) than NSIP (3.0%) (P=0.027). In contrast, BAL lymphocyte count was significantly higher in NSIP (29.0%) than UIP (5.5%) (P<0.0001). In 62 patients whose HRCT findings were atypical for UIP, BAL lymphocytosis was more frequently observed in NSIP (20/33) than UIP (4/29) (P<0.001) and the absence of BAL lymphocytosis suggested a diagnosis of UIP rather than NSIP (odds ratio 12.7, P<0.001). Pathologic diagnosis of NSIP was the only independent factor predicting a longer survival of our patients (median follow-up 21 months) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.035, P=0.005). When NSIP was not included in the survival analysis, higher BAL lymphocyte count was the only independent predictor of a longer survival (HR 0.909, P=0.029). BAL is an useful non-invasive tool in fibrotic IIP, not only for excluding a variety of specific non-IIP diseases but also for narrowing the differential diagnosis and predicting the prognosis in the absence of the histopathologic diagnosis.     

Histopathologic variability in usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonias.

Findings of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) are important in categorizing patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). We investigated whether histologic variability would be evident in SLB specimens from multiple lobes in patients with IIP. SLBs from 168 patients, 109 of whom had multiple lobes biopsied, were reviewed by three pathologists. A diagnosis was assigned to each lobe. A different diagnosis was found between lobes in 26% of the patients. Patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in all lobes were categorized as concordant for UIP (n = 51) and those with UIP in at least one lobe were categorized as discordant for UIP (n = 28). Patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in all lobes were categorized as having fibrotic (n = 25) or cellular NSIP (n = 5). No consistent distribution of lobar histology was noted. Patients concordant for UIP were older (63 +/- 9 [mean +/- SD] yr; p < 0.05 as compared with all other groups) than those discordant for UIP (57 +/- 12 yr) or with fibrotic NSIP (56 +/- 11 yr) or cellular NSIP (50 +/- 9 yr). Semiquantitative high-resolution computed tomography demonstrated a varied profusion of fibrosis (p < 0.05 for all group comparisons), with more fibrosis in concordant UIP (2.13 +/- 0.62) than in discordant UIP (1.42 +/- 0.73), fibrotic NSIP (0.83 +/- 0.58), or cellular NSIP (0.44 +/- 0.42). Survival was better for patients with NSIP than for those in both UIP groups (p < 0.001), although survival in the two UIP groups was comparable (p = 0.16). Lobar histologic variability is frequent in patients with IIP, patients with a histologic pattern of UIP in any lobe should be classified as having UIP.     

BAL findings in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which has the histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), is a progressive interstitial lung disease with a poor prognosis. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias with a histological pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) have a better prognosis than UIP, and may present with a clinical picture identical to IPF. The authors hypothesised that bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings may distinguish between UIP and NSIP, and have prognostic value within disease subgroups. BAL findings were studied retrospectively in 54 patients with histologically proven (surgical biopsy) idiopathic UIP (n=35) or fibrotic NSIP (n=19), all presenting clinically as IPF. These findings were also compared with the BAL profile of patients with other categories of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. BAL total and differential cell counts did not differ between the two groups. Survival was better in NSIP. In neither group were BAL findings predictive of survival or changes in lung function at 1 yr, even after adjustment for disease severity, smoking and treatment. BAL differential counts in fibrotic NSIP differed from respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease, but not from desquamative interstitial pneumonia or cellular NSIP. The authors conclude that bronchoalveolar lavage findings do not discriminate between usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in patients presenting with clinical features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and have no prognostic value, once the distinction between the two has been made histologically.     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: a real clinical entity?

Based on the current multidisciplinary classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) organized by ATS/ERS, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is considered as one type of IIP. An incidence of idiopathic NSIP is relatively small and possesses clinical features that are different than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Because there is little evidence of a long-term prognosis in patients with NSIP, some of them have an unfavorable prognosis similar to IPF/UIP. We review the significance of prognostic factors that have been reported in patients with IPF/UIP by applying them to patients with NSIP. The association with collagen vascular diseases focuses on etiologic background. Finally, the article discusses whether NSIP could be an early lesion of UIP based on the reported evidence and our own professional experiences.     

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: a provisional category of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) represent a complex group of relatively rare entities with similar clinical, vaguely similar radiographic and differing histologic features. The recent international multidisciplinary consensus statement produced by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society aiming to standardize the classification of IIP recognizes nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) as a provisional category. While not representing a single disease, but rather a collection of pathologic processes with similar histomorphology, NSIP has been a great source of confusion for pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. RECENT FINDINGS: Lacking diagnostic clinical or radiographic features, NSIP is an IIP with recognizable and reproducible morphologic patterns different from usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-pattern as well as other disease patterns. And while overlap with UIP-pattern can be seen in individuals with multiple biopsy samples, those with either cellular or fibrosing variants of NSIP have a better prognosis than UIP-pattern patients. SUMMARY: A morphologic diagnosis of NSIP-pattern alerts the clinician to a wide spectrum of potential clinical possibilities and enables researchers to study both this fibrosing interstitial pneumonia pattern and the more common and deadly UIP-pattern separately. Thus, this provisional category is useful to both clinicians and researchers.     

The clinical significance of histopathologic subgroups in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: is surgical lung biopsy essential?

For many years, the clinical entity of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) has been a source of confusion for physicians. There has been much debate over the utility of subclassifying this condition histopathologically. It now appears that such classification is useful, and the most important distinction is the presence or absence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Unlike the other histopathologic subgroups, UIP has a grave prognosis and responds poorly to traditional therapies. To emphasize this clinical difference, the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), once used synonymously with IIP, is now reserved for only those patients with the histopathologic pattern of UIP. Although the gold standard for the diagnosis of IPF/UIP remains surgical lung biopsy, recent studies suggest that careful clinical and radiographic evaluation can identify IPF/UIP with a specificity of 90% or more. In the absence of a clear clinical diagnosis, we recommend pursuing surgical lung biopsy. Knowledge of the underlying histopathology will allow for more accurate prognosis, help guide therapy, and make possible the clinical investigation of novel therapeutic agents for patients with IIP.     

非特异性间质性肺炎

非特异性间质性肺炎,是特发性间质性肺炎中继特发性肺间质纤维化后最常见的类型,它在流行病学、发病机制、临床表现、影像学特点、病理表现及预后等方面都有其自身特点,尤其是预后远较特发性肺间质纤维化好。本文将就目前对于NSIP的认识做一综述。     

Steroid treatment based on the findings of transbronchial biopsy in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.

This study was performed to find the rationale for administering steroids to patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), which was unlikely to be usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) but was not surgically biopsied. Among IIP patients in the file of the departments, nine patients who met the following criteria were selected for this study ("non-UIP" group): 1) transbronchial lung biopsy showed dense mononuclear cell infiltration in thickened alveolar septa; 2) chest radiograph and computed tomography showed irregular linear, reticular or ground-glass opacities with alveolar consolidation without honeycombing in the lung base; and 3) spirometry was performed before and after steroid therapy. Ten patients with pathologically confirmed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia ("NSIP" group) were also selected for the comparison. Baseline values and percentage increase of vital capacity (VC) after steroid therapy were plotted. Steroids improved VC in both groups of patients. After 1 yr of steroid therapy, percentage increase of VC in "non-UIP" was 28.8+/-7.7%, which was not significantly different from that in NSIP (30.0+/-11.7%). One "non-UIP" patient and one NSIP patient died after 6.4 and 4.3 yrs of follow-up, respectively. Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia presenting cellular interstitial pneumonia in transbronchial lung biopsy, in addition to radiographic findings not typical for usual interstitial pneumonia, could expect a beneficial effect of steroids without undergoing surgical biopsy.     

High-BAL fluid concentrations of RANTES in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia compared with usual interstitial pneumonia

Chemokines such as regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, monocyte inflammatory protein (MIP)-lalpha have been reported to play an important role in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung diseases. Among idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) has elevated percentages of Lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid compared with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). These chemokines are candidate mediators for lymphocyte attraction to the lung in NSIR Therefore, we measured the BAL fluid levels of RANTES, MCP-1 and MIP1-alpha in 15 patients with idiopathic NSIP, 20 with idiopathic UIP, 22 with sarcoidosis and 12 healthy volunteers to evaluate the contribution of these chemokines using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The levels of RANTES in BAL fluid were significantly higher in patients with NSIP compared with healthy volunteers (P < 0.01), UIP and sarcoidosis (P < 0.05). In MCP-1, the levels in BAL fluid of NSIP and UIP patients were significantly elevated compared with healthy volunteers and sarcoidosis patients (P < 0.01). These results suggest that RANTES and MCP-1 in BAL fluid may play an important role in inflammatory cell recruitment to the lung in idiopathic NSIP as well as other interstitial lung diseases.     

The prognostic significance of the histologic pattern of interstitial pneumonia in patients presenting with the clinical entity of cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis

Lone cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA) is a progressive interstitial lung disease, with a median survival of 3 to 6 yr from the onset of dyspnea. CFA can be subdivided into prognostically significant histopathologic patterns, including nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). We reviewed 78 patients with a clinicopathologic diagnosis of CFA, biopsied between 1978 and 1989, to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of these histopathologic patterns, in particular NSIP. Biopsy appearances were reclassified by two pulmonary histopathologists as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (47%), NSIP (36%), or desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP)/respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease (RBILD) (17%). The kappa coefficient of agreement between pathologists was 0.49. In 67 cases, follow-up was complete to death or 10 yr after biopsy, with 50 deaths during a median follow-up of 42 mo (UIP, 89%; NSIP, 61%, DIP/RBILD, 0%). Survival was highest in DIP/RBILD and higher in NSIP than UIP, p < 0.0005. When analysis was confined to patients with UIP or NSIP, the mortality of UIP remained higher, p < 0.01, but the 5-yr survival in patients with fibrotic NSIP was only 45%, indicating that this histologic appearance is often associated with a poor outcome. A response to treatment was more frequent in DIP/RBILD than in NSIP (p < 0.01) or UIP (p < 0.0005). This study confirms the prognostic value of subclassifying patients with CFA according to histopathologic pattern. However, in patients with clinically typical CFA, a histologic diagnosis of fibrotic NSIP needs to be interpreted with caution and does not necessarily denote a good outcome.     

A comparison of bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia, usual interstitial pneumonia, and small airways disease

This report is based on 43 cases where a diagnosis of either bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia (BOOP), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), or small airways disease (SAD) was established by lung biopsy. The severity of histologic abnormalities in the peripheral airways and interstitial spaces were measured on these biopsies using semiquantitative techniques and compared with the clinical data available in 42 of 43 cases, preoperative chest radiographs in 31 of 43, and preoperative pulmonary function tests in 29 of 43. The data show that when a diagnosis of BOOP was made, there was a higher total pathologic score for membraneous bronchiolitis (MB) and respiratory bronchiolitis (RB) than for UIP and SAD (p less than 0.005). This was due to peribronchiolar inflammation and the presence of loose connective tissue in the RB lumen. The pathologic changes in the interstitial space were less severe in SAD than in BOOP or UIP (p less than 0.005). Clubbing was more frequent in UIP (p less than 0.01), and symptoms were of shorter duration in BOOP (p less than 0.05). The radiographic assessment showed that the characteristic finding in BOOP was patchy air-space consolidation, a finding that was not present in UIP or SAD.     

Clinico-pathological study of collagen-related pulmonary lesions in cases of open lung biopsy]

We studied the clinico-pathological correlation of collagen disease-related pulmonary lesions to examine the pathological and radiological features of collagen lung, and the effect of steroid therapy. Ten open lung biopsy cases were examined; 4 male, and 6 female. The mean age was 55 years old. Seven cases developed pulmonary shadows after the diagnosis of collagen disease, and 3 cases showed pulmonary shadow prior to diagnosis. Pathologically, 6 cases proved to be bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), 3 cases were chronic interstitial pneumonia (UIP), and 1 case was acute interstitial pneumonia. All cases had inflammatory thickening of the interstitium involving the pleura, bronchial wall, and perivascular connective tissue. Half of the cases had bronchiolar inflammatory lesions. Radiologically BOOP cases showed either localized ground glass shadows, or diffuse reticulonodular shadows predominantly in the lower lung fields with shrinkage of affected areas. UIP cases showed reticulonodular shadows, and active UIP cases showed overlapping ground glass shadows. Steroids were administered in cases of BOOP and active UIP, and all cases showed improvement. We consider that open lung biopsy is of use in the diagnosis of some cases and in assessing whether steroid therapy is indicated.     

Prognosis of fibrotic interstitial pneumonia: idiopathic versus collagen vascular disease-related subtypes

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the better prognosis of interstitial pneumonias associated with collagen vascular disease (CVD) compared with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is due to higher frequency of the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern in CVD, we compared the outcomes of patients from these two groups with the same histopathologic pattern. SUBJECTS: The clinical features and survival of 362 patients (269 with IIP and 93 with CVD) diagnosed using surgical lung biopsy were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean survival of the CVD group (131.0 mo) was longer than that of the IIP group (80.5 mo) (p<0.0001). The patients with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern among the CVD group (n=36) was younger, female, and predominantly nonsmoking compared with the IIP group (n=203). Although baseline lung functions were not significantly different, the CVD group survived longer (mean, 177.0 mo) than the IIP group (mean, 66.9 +/- 6.5 mo; p=0.001). By multivariate analysis, younger age, better pulmonary function, and the presence of a CVD were independent prognostic factors. In NSIP pattern, no significant differences in survival, clinical features, or lung function were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the better prognosis of patients in the CVD group is not solely due to the predominance of the NSIP pattern. The prognosis of patients with the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern in CVD is better than in those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, despite the same pathologic pattern. In contrast, in those with an NSIP pattern, the prognosis is similar in both groups.     

The appearance of S-100 protein-positive dendritic cells and the distribution of lymphocyte subsets in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is a progressive interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology. We investigated dendritic cells in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) immunohistochemically, using anti-S-100 protein antibody and anti-HLA-DR antibody and also evaluated the relationship between the distribution of S-100 protein-positive dendritic cells (S- 100 DCs) and the lymphocytic subsets in the lung tissue of NSIP. Fifteen patients with the pathological diagnosis of idiopathic NSIP and six patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were recruited into this study. Many S-100 DCs were observed in all the cases of idiopathic NSIP but S-100 DCs were not recognized in UIP cases invariably. In the mirror section method, most S-100 DCs showed a positive reaction of anti-HLA-DR antibody but a negative reaction for anti-CD1a antibody. CD8 and CD4 positive lymphocytes were infiltrated diffusely around S-100 DCs. It was demonstrated that the infiltration of CD8 positive lymphocytes predominated in the fibrosing areas and lymphoid follicles around S-100 DCs more so than CD4 positive lymphocytes.We speculate that the pathogenesis of NSIP is different from UIP and that DC and T cell-mediated immune mechanisms may play a role in the development and perpetuation of NSIP.     

Role of surgical lung biopsy in separating chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia from usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: analysis of 31 biopsies from 15 patients

BACKGROUND: Lung biopsy has been proposed as a criterion for diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia (HP), especially in patients without proven antigen exposure. Histologic findings in some suspected HP patients overlap with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). We reviewed our experience to determine the specificity of histologic findings in surgical lung biopsies from patients with clinical diagnoses of HP. METHODS: Surgical lung biopsies from patients with chronic HP, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and idiopathic NSIP were reviewed retrospectively without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis. Each specimen was assigned a histologic diagnosis, and selected histologic findings were tabulated. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with clinical diagnoses of chronic HP underwent biopsy of one to three lobes. Ten showed features diagnostic of HP in all specimens. Two had discordant findings that included HP in one specimen and UIP or nonspecific changes in others. Biopsies from two showed only UIP, and one showed NSIP. Diagnostic features were present in all samples from 9 of the 11 patients with more than one biopsy site (81.8%). Three patients died of disease, including both patients from whom biopsies showed only UIP. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic HP have supportive histologic findings in surgical lung biopsies. A subset of HP patients has findings indistinguishable from UIP. Sampling from more than one lobe may be helpful in separating HP from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.     

A histologic pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia is associated with a better prognosis than usual interstitial pneumonia in patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis.

This study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in outcome related to histologic pattern in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA) and to see whether there were correlations between clinical and radiologic findings and histology. One hundred thirteen lung biopsies from consecutive patients taken for the diagnosis of diffuse lung disease were reviewed and reclassified using the Katzenstein and Myers criteria for interstitial pneumonias. Patients lacking full investigational data at presentation and those with conditions predisposing to lung fibrosis were excluded, leaving 15 patients diagnosed with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and 15 with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Clinical and radiologic findings at presentation and serial lung function information and survival status in November 1998 were compared for the two groups. Survival was found to be significantly greater in the NSIP group compared with the UIP group (p < 0.001). This could not be explained by differences in treatment. Patients with UIP showed a progressive deterioration in lung function whereas those with NSIP remained stable. CT scans of patients with UIP showed more fibrosis than those of patients with NSIP (p < 0.011). A histologic diagnosis of NSIP is associated with a better prognosis than UIP. This subclassification of CFA is clinically useful.