Segmental hepatic resection utilizing the ultrasonic dissector

Hepatic resection continues to become a more widely accepted therapeutic modality, with increased use as improved imaging modalities more precisely define the nature and extent of various liver abnormalities. The surgical anatomy of the liver indicates that there are eight segments with single or multiple segmental resections able to be performed. The use of the ultrasonic dissector facilitates the performance of transparenchymatous segmental resection without obtaining vascular inflow or outflow control. This report describes the segmental anatomy of the liver and the use of the ultrasonic dissector. Thirteen patients have undergone segmental hepatic resection with the ultrasonic dissector. Five patients had cirrhosis. Mean +/- 1 SD operative time required for segmental resection was 128 +/- 57 minutes, and blood loss was 830 +/- 623 mL. Utilization of the ultrasonic dissector to perform segmental hepatic resection may increase our versatility in the management of various hepatic and biliary tract diseases.     

Hepatic resection using a water jet dissector

A newly-designed water jet dissector was used for hepatic resections in humans. To evaluate its usefulness, the water jet dissector was compared toan ultrasonic surgical aspirator in terms of average blood loss and time of operation. In hepatectomies on patients associated with liver cirrhosis, the average blood loss during hepatic resection using the water jet dissector was significantly smaller (P<0.05) than that with the ultrasonic surgical aspirator. However, in hepatectomies on patients without cirrhosis, the average blood loss during hepatic resection did not significantly differ between the two groups. Neither did the time of operation significantly differ between the two procedures in hepatectomies on patients with and without liver cirrhosis. No serious complications attributable to the use of the water jet dissector were encountered. The water jet dissector is thus considered to be a useful new device for use in the transection of the liver during hepatic resections.     

Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study

BACKGROUND: After technical advances in hepatic surgery and laparoscopic surgery, some teams evaluated the possibilities of laparoscopic liver resections. The aim of our study was to assess the results of laparoscopic left lateral lobectomy (bisegmentectomy 2-3) and to perform a case-control comparison with the same operation performed by open surgery. STUDY DESIGN: From 1996 to 2002, 60 laparoscopic resections were performed in selected patients, including 18 left lateral lobectomies. The resected lesions were benign tumors, hepatocellular carcinomas with compensated cirrhosis, and metastases. Surgical procedures were performed with a harmonic scalpel, an ultrasonic dissector, linear staplers, and portal pedicule clamping when necessary. Results were compared with those of patients who underwent open left lateral lobectomies selected from our liver resection database in a case-control analysis. Both groups were similar for age, type and size of the tumor, and presence of underlying liver disease. RESULTS: Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic left lateral lobectomies were associated with a longer surgical time (202 versus 145 minutes, p < 0.01), a longer portal triad clamping (39 versus 23 minutes, p < 0.05), and a decreased blood loss (236 versus 429 mL, p < 0.05). There were no deaths in either group, and the morbidity rates were 11% in the laparoscopic group and 15% in the open group. There were no specific complications of hepatic resection after laparoscopy (no hemorrhage, subphrenic collection, or biliary leak), but some were observed in the open group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety of laparoscopic left lateral lobectomy. Despite longer operation and clamping time, without any clinical consequences, the laparoscopic approach was associated with decreased blood loss and absence of specific complications of the hepatic resection.     

Techniques of liver resection. Comparison of suction knife, ultrasonic dissector, and contact neodymium-YAG laser

Liver resections were performed in 18 pigs with an inexpensive disposable plastic suction knife, an ultrasonic dissector, or a contact neodymium (Nd)-YAG laser. Technical aspects and intraoperative and postoperative data were compared. Intraoperative blood loss was less with the suction knife (112 +/- 28 mL) than with the ultrasonic dissector (149 +/- 45 mL) or Nd-YAG laser (174 +/- 25 mL). Operating time was similar in all groups. The number of ligatures used in the Nd-YAG laser group (12 +/- 1) was significantly less than in the ultrasonic dissector (27 +/- 2) or suction knife (32 +/- 2) groups. In the ultrasonic dissector group, there was an increase in postoperative white blood cell count and liver enzyme levels compared with the other two groups. Light microscopy revealed dilated bile ducts in the ultrasonic dissector resection group, which may reflect biliary stasis. There were no significant differences in mortality among the three experimental groups. Results indicated that the ultrasonic dissector and the contact laser method were not substantially better than an inexpensive, easily modified plastic suction catheter in performing a major nonanatomic liver resection in piglets.     

Hepatic resections for primary and metastatic tumors using the ultrasonic surgical dissector.

We have previously described the development of new hepatic surgical techniques using the ultrasonic surgical dissector. With 10 years' experience, we have found that major liver resections have been simplified and that the technique is repeatable in hands other than our own. Thirty-three patients had 37 tumors, averaging 5.65 cm in size, resected with an average blood loss of only 1,020 mL per case, which included 5 right trisegmentectomies, 12 lobectomies, 15 segmental resections, and 4 subsegmental resections. Twenty-two patients had metastatic colorectal cancer. Blood transfusion requirements averaged only 2.24 units in long-term survivors, which was significantly less than the 3.5 units received by patients who have since died (p = 0.092). There were no operative deaths. The median survival of these 22 patients was 56 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 35%. All of the early deaths occurred in patients with more than four tumors, and no patient with less than four tumors died before 42 months with recurrent disease. Six patients had bilateral tumors, and the fact that patients survived into the fourth and fifth post-resectional year indicates that resection was worthwhile. All these patients had Dukes' C primary tumors, but we found no statistical difference in survival between patients with Dukes' B and Dukes' C lesions. The results indicate that hepatic resection with the ultrasonic surgical dissector decreases blood loss, requires few transfusions, is safe to perform, and is associated with excellent long-term survival.     

Right hepatectomies without vascular clamping: report of 87 cases

Background/Purpose. Portal triad clamping and total or intermittent hepatic vascular exclusion are usually used to reduce blood loss during major liver resections. We report, in this retrospective study, the results of right hepatectomy without vascular clamping. Methods. From January 1986 to July 2001, 87 right hepatectomies, including 14 extended right hepatectomies, were performed without vascular clamping. There was 53 men and 34 women, with a mean age of 60.2 ± 12.5 years. Indications were 58 metastases, 16 hepatocellular carcinomas, 5 cholangiocarcinomas, 4 adenomas, 3 angiomas, and 1 carcinoid tumor. All the procedures were carried out using an ultrasonic dissector and intraoperative ultrasonography with only vascular control (looping of the hepatic pedicle and supra; and infrahepatic vena cava). Results. There were four postoperative deaths and 23 complications (26%), including hepatocellular failure (6), pulmonary complications (6), transient bile leakage (5), digestive bleeding (2), subphrenic abscess (1), inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis (1), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; 1), and evisceration (1). Forty-two patients (48%) had no blood transfusion. The mean blood transfusion requirement was 1.5 ± 2.7 units. The mean operative length was 280 ± 60 min and the mean hospital stay was 12.8 ± 8.1 days. Liver function test results were similar to those in other studies on days 1, 4, and 7 postoperatively, with a return to normal values after 1 week. Conclusions. In our experience with major liver resections, vascular clamping is not necessary. Received: March 31, 2002 / Accepted: September 26, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Offprint requests to: F. Lachachi     

Hepatic resection without mortality at a community hospital

The mortality of elective hepatic resections is now below 5%, and the improved result has been attributed partly to performance of such operations at high-volume specialized units. We retrospectively studied 60 consecutive elective hepatic resections performed during a 2-year period between April 1998 and March 2000 at a Red Cross community hospital. There was no hospital mortality and morbidity occurred in 20 patients (33.3%). High morbidity was associated with concomitant surgical procedures, especially ones with contamination of the operative field such as biliary and gastric surgery, but not with colonic procedures. Hepatic resections for primary and secondary malignancy, as well as benign diseases, can be performed without mortality at community hospitals, provided that adequate selection criteria is used and appropriate operative and postoperative management are available.     

Occlusion of hepatic blood inflow for complex central liver resections in cirrhotic patients: a randomized comparison of hemihepatic and total hepatic occlusion techniques

BACKGROUND: Intermittent occlusion of hepatic blood inflow by means of a hemihepatic or total hepatic occlusion technique is essential for reducing operative blood loss. Central liver resection to preserve more functioning liver parenchyma is mandatory for centrally located liver tumors in patients with cirrhosis, but it requires a longer overall hepatic ischemic time because of a wide transection plane. No controlled comparison has been performed for the 2 techniques in these operations. HYPOTHESIS: Hemihepatic inflow occlusion may be beneficial in cirrhotic patients who undergo complex central hepatectomy with a wide liver transection plane. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University hospital and tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: During liver parenchymal transection, 58 cirrhotic patients who underwent complex central liver resections with a wide transection plane were prospectively randomized into 2 groups. In the group undergoing total hepatic inflow clamping (group T; n = 28), occlusion of hepatic blood inflow was performed for 15 minutes with declamping for 5 minutes. In the group undergoing selective clamping of ipsilateral blood inflow (group H; n = 30), clamping was performed for 30 minutes with declamping for 5 minutes. INTERVENTION: Comparison of patient backgrounds, operative procedures, and early postoperative results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: The patients' backgrounds, operative procedures, and area of liver transection plane were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In all patients, the liver transection areas were greater than 60 cm(2) and overall liver ischemic times were greater than 60 minutes. The amount of operative blood loss and incidence of blood transfusion were significantly greater in group T because of greater blood loss during declamping. Overall liver ischemic and total operative times, postoperative morbidity, and postoperative changes in liver enzyme levels were not significantly different between groups. No in-hospital deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent hemihepatic and total occlusion of hepatic blood inflow are safe in cirrhotic patients with an overall ischemic time of greater than 60 minutes. However, for complex liver resections with an estimated liver transection plane of greater than 60 cm(2), hemihepatic occlusion of blood inflow, if feasible, may be recommended in cirrhotic patients to reduce operative blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusion under our defined occlusion time.     

Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade

OBJECTIVE: To assess the nature of changes in the field of hepatic resectional surgery and their impact on perioperative outcome. METHODS: Demographics, extent of resection, concomitant major procedures, operative and transfusion data, complications, and hospital stay were analyzed for 1,803 consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection from December 1991 to September 2001 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality and trends in operative and perioperative variables over the period of study were analyzed. RESULTS: Malignant disease was the most common diagnosis (1,642 patients, 91%); of these cases, metastatic colorectal cancer accounted for 62% (n = 1,021). Three hundred seventy-five resections (21%) were performed for primary hepatic or biliary cancers and 161 (9%) for benign disease. Anatomical resections were performed in 1,568 patients (87%) and included 544 extended hepatectomies, 483 hepatectomies, and 526 segmental resections. Sixty-two percent of patients had three or more segments resected, 42% had bilobar resections, and 37% had concomitant additional major procedures. The median blood loss was 600 mL and 49% of patients were transfused at any time during the index admission. Median hospital stay was 8 days, morbidity was 45%, and operative mortality was 3.1%. Over the study period, there was a significant increase in the use of parenchymal-sparing segmental resections and a decrease in the number of hepatic segments resected. In parallel with this, there was a significant decline in blood loss, the use of blood products, and hospital stay. Despite an increase in concomitant major procedures, operative mortality decreased from approximately 4% in the first 5 years of the study to 1.3% in the last 2 years, with 0 operative deaths in the last 184 consecutive cases. On multivariate analysis, the number of hepatic segments resected and operative blood loss were the only independent predictors of both perioperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade, the use of parenchymal-sparing segmental resections has increased significantly. The number of hepatic segments resected and operative blood loss were the only predictors of both perioperative morbidity and mortality, and reductions in both are largely responsible for the decrease in perioperative mortality, which has occurred despite an increase in concomitant major procedures.     

Outcome of central hepatectomy for hepatoblastomas

Background/Purpose

Central hepatoblastomas (CHBL) involving liver segments (IV + V) or (IV + V + VIII) are in contact with the portal bifurcation. Their resection may be achieved by central hepatectomy (CH) with thin resection margins on both sides of the liver pedicle, by extended right or left hepatectomy with thin resection margins on one side, or by liver transplantation with thick free margins. The aim of this study is to assess the operative and postoperative outcome of CH for hepatoblastoma.

Methods

This was a retrospective monocentric study of 9 patients who underwent CH for CHBL between 1996 and 2008.

Results

The operative time was 4 hours 50 minutes (2 hours 20 minutes to 7 hours), vascular clamping lasted 30 minutes (0-90 minutes), and the amount of blood cell transfusion was 250 mL (0-1800 mL). Two patients had biliary leakage requiring percutaneous drainage. Median follow-up time was 27 months (14-120 months). All of 8 nonmetastatic patients are alive and disease-free; 1 metastatic patient died of recurrent metastases at last follow-up. Although 3 of 9 patients had surgical margins less than 1 mm, none, including the patients who died from metastases, had local recurrence.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of CH for CHBL without operative mortality or local recurrence. Central hepatectomy is an alternative to extensive liver resections in selected patients.     

A new approach to hand-assisted laparoscopic liver surgery

Background  The best type of laparoscopic approach in solid liver tumours (SLTs), whether total laparoscopic surgery or hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), has not yet been established. Our objective is to present our experience with laparoscopic liver resections in SLTs performed by HALS using a new approach. Methods  We performed 35 laparoscopic resections in SLTs, of which 26 were carried out using HALS (in 25 patients) and 21 patients had liver metastases of a colorectal origin (LMCRC) (1 patient had 2 resections), 1 metastasis from a neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas, 1 hepatocarcinoma on a healthy liver, 1 primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma and 1 giant haemangioma. Mean follow-up was 22 months. Operation  One right hemihepatectomy, one left hemihepatectomy, five bisegmentectomies II–III, three bisegmentectomies VI–VII and 16 segmentectomies (five of S. VI, three of S. VIII; three of S. V; two of S. IVb; one of S. II; one of S. IV; and in the remaining case resection of S. III and VI plus resection of a metastasis in S. VIII). Main outcome measures  Morbidity and mortality, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative blood loss, intra- and postoperative transfusion, length of stay and survival. Results  There were no intra- or postoperative deaths, nor were there any conversions. One patient presented with morbidity (3.8%) (liver abscess). Mean blood loss was 200 ml (range 0–600 ml). One patient required transfusion (3.8%). Mean operative time was 180 min (range 120–360 min). Mean length of hospital stay was 4 days (range 2–5 days). The actuarial survival rate of the patients at 36 months with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma (LMCRC) was 80%. Conclusions  Liver resection with HALS reproduces the low morbidity and mortality rates and effectiveness (3-year survival) of open surgery in SLTs when indicated selectively.     

Is any method of vascular control superior in hepatic resection of metastatic cancers? Longmire clamping, pringle maneuver, and total vascular isolation

HYPOTHESIS: Although control of the hepatic vascular pedicle is commonly used during hepatic resection, the optimal method of vascular control continues to be debated. The utility of total or selective vascular isolation, pedicle inflow occlusion, or the absence of vascular isolation during minor and major hepatectomy needs to be examined. DESIGN: Retrospective review of hepatic resections performed for either isolated colorectal or noncolorectal hepatic metastases. SETTING: The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, a tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-one patients who underwent hepatic resection for isolated metastatic liver disease were identified through The University of Chicago Hospitals Tumor Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative parameters, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and tumor recurrence. RESULTS: Four groups were compared with alternative methods of vascular management, including total vascular isolation, Longmire clamping, Pringle maneuver, or no vascular control. Tumor number and size were not significantly different between groups. Blood loss and transfusion requirements tended to be higher in the total vascular isolation group and were significantly higher compared with the Pringle group (P =.06) and the no vascular control group (P =.04), but this also correlated with a higher incidence of complexity of surgical resection. The highest incidence of postoperative complications occurred in the total vascular isolation group (P<.05). With similar permanent pathologic margins, the rates of intrahepatic recurrence were similar among all groups, with the no vascular control group having the lowest recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: All methods of vascular control appeared equivalent with respect to limiting blood loss and transfusion requirements while providing adequate surgical margins. The highest rates of blood requirements and complications were noted in the total vascular isolation group, which corresponded to the highest incidence of complex resections. The Longmire clamp group incurred the lowest incidence of complications and resulted in identical surgical margins. The application of vascular control is beneficial to surgeons during hepatic resection, but the method of control should be selected based on the location and complexity of resection required and preference of the individual surgeon.     

Major hepatic resection under total vascular exclusion.

Over a 9-year period, major resection was successfully performed on 51 occasions with total vascular exclusion using supra- and infrahepatic caval and portal vein clamping. The main indications for hepatic resection were centrally located tumor in liver metastases (62%) and hepatocellular carcinoma with no evidence of co-existing cirrhosis (25%). Major resections included extended and regular right hepatectomy, extended left hepatectomy, and segmentectomy. The mean duration of vascular exclusion was 46.5 +/- 5.0 minutes (range 20 to 70 minutes) and mean blood transfusion requirement was 1.4 +/- 0.4 units during vascular exclusion. There were significant correlations between postoperative fall in factor II levels and the number of segments removed (r = 0.37, p = 0.015) and between serum alanine aminotransferase levels at day 2 and the duration of vascular exclusion (r = 0.35, p = 0.02). One patient died 45 days after the procedure of multi-organ failure and sepsis. Nonfatal complications occurred in 7 patients (14%) and included respiratory infection (7 patients), biliary fistula (3 patients), and collection at the site of hepatic resection (3 patients). Total vascular exclusion is a safe and useful technique in resection of major hepatic lesions that involve hepatic veins.     

Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver

HYPOTHESIS: Hepatic parenchymal transection is a technical priority in liver surgery. The use of an ultrasonic dissector for hepatectomy may result in less blood loss than conventional clamp crushing. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The 132 patients scheduled to undergo partial hepatectomies were randomly assigned to receive hepatic transection by ultrasonic dissector or by clamp crushing (66 patients by each method). INTERVENTIONS: All resections were performed with inflow occlusion and were guided ultrasonographically. Hepatectomies were graded according to a predefined system based on 6 criteria (blood loss, transection time, technical error, surgical margin, landmark appearance, and postoperative morbidity), each with 3 scores (lower scores indicating higher quality). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood loss and hepatectomy grade. RESULTS: No difference was found between the ultrasonic and clamp groups in median blood loss (515 mL [range, 15-2527 mL] vs 452 mL [range, 17-1912 mL]; P =.63), transection time (61 minutes [range, 16-177 minutes] vs 54 minutes [range, 7-205 minutes]; P =.58), or transection speed (1.1 cm(2)/min [range, 0.4-4.0 cm(2)/min] vs 1.0 cm(2)/min [range, 0.4-3.0 cm(2)/min]; P =.90). Ultrasonic dissection caused more frequent histologically proven tumor exposure at the surgical margin (9 vs 3 patients; P =.09), incomplete appearance of landmark hepatic veins on the cut surface after anatomical resection (12 vs 4 patients; P =.03), and postoperative morbidity (20 vs 14 patients; P =.32) than did clamp crushing. The hepatectomies with clamp crushing had significantly higher grades than those with ultrasonic dissection (P =.05), as indicated by the lower median sum score (4.0 [range, 0-12] vs 5.0 [range, 0-19]; 95% confidence interval for difference, -2.0 to 0; P =.03). The transection method independently influenced hepatectomy grade (adjusted odds ratio = 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-6.92; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic dissection offers no reduction in blood loss compared with clamp crushing for transection of the liver. Clamp crushing results in a higher quality of hepatectomy and is therefore the option of choice.     

A prospective evaluation of ultrasonic dissector plus harmonic scalpel in liver resection

Several techniques have been described for safe dissection of the liver parenchyma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of combining two different electronic devices, the ultrasonic dissector and the harmonic scalpel, during hepatic resection. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent liver resection between January and December 2004 were enclosed in the study. Patients requiring concomitant colic resection or biliary-enteric anastomosis were excluded from the study. Operative variables (type of procedure, operating time, Pringle time, blood losses, transfusions, and histological tumor exposure at the transection surface), hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The extent of hepatic resection was a minor resection in 31 and major in 69 cases. Median blood loss was 500 mL (range, 100-2000 mL) and the Pringle maneuver was used in 58 patients. Median operative time was 367 minutes (range, 150-660 minutes). Hepatic resection was performed in 32 cirrhotic livers. Surgical complications included one postoperative hemorrhage and two bile leaks. The overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14 and 1 per cent, respectively. In conclusion, the combined use of these electronic devices allows liver resection to be safely performed, even in cirrhotic patients, with the advantage of reducing surgical complications. A prospective randomized trial is needed to clarify the clinical benefits of liver resections performed combining these two devices.     

Surgical outcomes of isolated caudate lobe resection: a single series of 19 patients

BACKGROUND: Isolated caudate lobe resection is a complex surgical procedure that requires technical expertise and knowledge of the surgical anatomy. METHODS: All consecutive patients who were operated on for isolated caudate lobe resections by the senior author were studied. En bloc resections with adjacent hepatic parenchyma (as part of extended hepatectomies) or partial resections of the caudate lobe were excluded. Follow-up was completed by outpatient evaluation and mail correspondence. RESULTS: Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria (6 male, 13 female). Mean age (+/-SD) was 52 (+/-3) years. Primary diagnoses were colorectal metastases, hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, adenoma, and neuroendocrine metastases. Margins were negative in all but 1 patient. One patient needed inferior vena cava resection. Pringle's maneuver was used in 1 patient (5%). Mean (+/-SD) operative time was 211 (+/-15) minutes, and estimated blood loss was 760 (+/-150) mL. Median blood transfusion was 0 U (range, 0-4). Complications (bile leak) were seen in 1 patient (5%). Median length of stay was 7 days (range, 4-14). There were no perioperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated caudate lobe resection is a feasible procedure that can be done with low morbidity/mortality. Sound surgical judgment and detailed knowledge of the caudate lobe anatomy are keys for a safe performance of this procedure.     

Segmental liver resection using ultrasound-guided selective portal venous occlusion

Anatomical segmental resection of small hepatic lesions using operative ultrasonography is improved by selective intrahepatic portal venous occlusion. The technique was successfully performed in 15 of the 18 patients in whom it was attempted. The lesions resected included 7 hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients, 5 hepatic metastases, 2 benign tumors and 1 gallbladder carcinoma. The mean duration of local vascular exclusion was 47 minutes (range, 22 to 80 minutes) and mean blood transfusion requirement was 1.3 units (range, 0 to 7 units). Five patients sustained postoperative complications and these included chest infection (2 patients), ascites (2 patients), pleural effusion (1 patient) and hemorrhage (1 patient) from the site of hepatic resection. There were no postoperative deaths. One patient required further resection of a recurrent colonic metastasis and two patients have died of disseminated disease. This technique has allowed limited anatomical resection of lesions that would have otherwise required extensive classical hepatic resections or would have not been amenable to resection.     

Vascular occlusions for liver resections. Operative management and tolerance to hepatic ischemia: 142 cases.

The intra- and early postoperative courses of 142 consecutive patients who underwent liver resections using vascular occlusions to reduce bleeding were reviewed. In 127 patients, the remnant liver parenchyma was normal, and 15 patients had liver cirrhosis. Eighty-five patients underwent major liver resections: right, extended right, or left lobectomies. Portal triad clamping (PTC) was used alone in 107 cases. Complete hepatic vascular exclusion (HVE) combining PTC and occlusion of the inferior vena cava below and above the liver was used for 35 major liver resections. These 35 patients had large or posterior liver tumors, and HVE was used to reduce the risks of massive bleeding or air embolism caused by an accidental tear of the vena cava or a hepatic vein. Duration of normothermic liver ischemia was 32.3 +/- 1.2 minutes (mean +/- SEM) and ranged from 8 to 90 minutes. Amount of blood transfusion was 5.5 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SEM) units of packed red blood cells. There were eight operative deaths (5.6%). Overall, postoperative complications occurred in 46 patients (32%). The patients who experienced complications after surgery had received more blood transfusion than those with an uneventful postoperative course (p less than 0.001). The length of postoperative hospital stay was also correlated with the amount of blood transfused during surgery (p less than 0.001). On the other hand, there was no correlation between the durations of liver ischemia of up to 90 minutes and the lengths of postoperative hospital stay. The longest periods of ischemia were not associated with increased rates of postoperative complications, liver failures, or deaths. There was no difference in mortality or morbidity after major liver resections performed with the use of HVE as compared with major liver resections carried out with PTC alone, although the lesions were larger in the former group. It is concluded that the main priority during liver resections is to reduce operative bleeding. Vascular occlusions aim at achieving this goal and can be extended safely for up to 60 minutes.     

Hepatic Resection Using a Water Jet Dissector

The mortality and morbidity in major hepatic resection is often related to hemorrhage. A high pressure, high velocity water jet has been developed and has been utilized to assist in hepatic parenchymal transection. Sixty-seven major hepatic resections were performed for solid hepatic tumors. The tissue fracture technique was used in 51 patients (76%), and the water jet dissector was used predominantly in 16 patients (24%). The extent of hepatic resection using each technique was similar. The results showed no difference in operative duration (p = .499). The mean estimated blood loss using the water jet was 1386 ml, and tissue fracture technique 2450 ml (p = .217). Transfusion requirements were less in the water jet group (mean 2.0 units) compared to the tissue fracture group (mean 5.2 units); (p = .023). Results obtained with the new water dissector are encouraging. The preliminary results suggest that blood loss may be diminished.     

Reduction of transfusion requirements during major hepatic resection for metastatic disease

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to determine whether the combination of total liver vascular inflow occlusion (Pringle maneuver) and rapid hepatic transection with a clamp-crush technique results in significant reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirements during major hepatic resections. METHODS: A series of 49 adult patients underwent major hepatic resections for metastatic disease between April 1, 1992, and March 31, 1998. Group 1 patients (n = 15) had standard hilar dissection and finger-fracture hepatic transection without total liver inflow occlusion. Group 2 patients (n = 34) had total liver inflow occlusion and clamp-crush parenchymal transection. RESULTS: Median blood loss was 1600 mL for group 1 and 500 mL for group 2 (P = .001). Eleven (73%) patients in group 1 required intraoperative blood transfusion (median 2 units) compared with 7 (21%) in group 2 with a median of 0 units (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Of the 7 patients in group 2 who required transfusion, 3 had a preoperative hemoglobin below 10 g/dL, 1 required splenectomy for operative injury, and 1 underwent a concomitant complicated small bowel resection. CONCLUSIONS: Major hepatic resections can be performed without transfusion of blood products when preoperative hemoglobin is above 10 g/dL and concomitant major surgical procedures are not required.