宫腔冲洗引流在重度宫腔粘连患者宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后的应用效果研究

目的:评价宫腔冲洗引流在重度宫腔粘连患者宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术(TCRA)后的临床应用效果。方法:选择2019年1～12月在郑州大学第三附属医院就诊的重度宫腔粘连患者86例作为研究对象,根据术后预防再粘连的方法不同分为3组:A组30例,术后放置二腔球囊导管引流,B组30例,术后放置三腔球囊导管+0.9%氯化钠液冲洗引流,C组26例,术后放置三腔球囊导管+抗生素冲洗引流。比较3组患者宫腔引流量、子宫内膜厚度、月经评分、宫腔形态、满意度、妊娠结局及不良反应发生情况。结果:术后6个月3组患者子宫内膜厚度、月经评分、宫腔形态均较术前改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B、C两组术后总引流液量、子宫内膜厚度、月经评分、宫腔形态改善率均高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B、C两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组不良反应、妊娠情况、满意情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TCRA后放置三腔球囊导管行冲洗引流相比放置二腔球囊导管被动引流更能有效预防重度宫腔粘连术后再粘连的发生,增加患者子宫内膜厚度,有效改善月经情况,采用0.9%氯化钠液或抗生素冲洗宫腔对比术后治疗效果无明显差别。     

中重度宫腔粘连分离术后预防宫腔再粘连的临床效果观察

目的:探讨中重度宫腔粘连分离术后预防宫腔再粘连的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月至2014年6月在武汉大学人民医院就诊的119例经宫腔镜检查确诊为中重度宫腔粘连并行TCRA术患者的临床资料。术后宫腔放置Foley球囊导尿管+宫内节育器为A组,宫腔放置Foley球囊导尿管+宫内节育器+可吸收医用膜为B组,术后均使用人工周期。比较患者的术后月经改善、宫腔及妊娠情况。结果:中度宫腔粘连患者中,B组的治愈率高于A组(57.7%vs 31.0%,P=0.047),宫腔再粘连率低于A组(15.4%vs 44.8%,P=0.018);A、B组的妊娠率分别为40%、60%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.37)。重度宫腔粘连患者中,B组的治愈率高于A组(43.8%vs 18.8%,P=0.031),宫腔再粘连率低于A组(15.6%vs 46.9%,P=0.007);A、B组的妊娠率分别为11.1%和33.3%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.257)。结论:中重度宫腔粘连分离术后联合使用Foley球囊导尿管+宫内节育器+可吸收医用膜治疗效果优于Foley球囊导尿管+宫内节育器组。     

防粘连膜联合宫内节育器用于宫腔粘连的效果分析

目的:探讨防粘连膜联合宫内节育器用于宫腔粘连治疗的效果及临床价值。方法:选择2012年1月至2016年12月哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院收治的宫腔粘连患者55例,行宫腔镜下宫腔粘连切除术后,根据术后不同预防粘连方式分为观察组(25例)和对照组(30例)。观察组患者采用防粘连膜+宫内节育器,对照组患者采用宫内节育器。比较两组患者治疗后宫腔恢复情况、月经改善情况及妊娠情况。结果:观察组患者术后3个月宫腔粘连治疗的有效率为96.0%,对照组患者有效率为73.3%,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者月经恢复有效率为88.0%,对照组患者为60.0%,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者妊娠率为36.0%,对照组患者为36.7%,两组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:防粘连膜联合宫内节育器用于宫腔粘连行宫腔镜下宫腔粘连切除术后患者,可明显降低宫腔再粘连的发生,改善月经情况,具有一定临床价值。     

宫腔粘连术后应用三腔导管负压冲洗引流装置的临床疗效观察

目的:探讨宫腔三腔导管负压冲洗引流装置在宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术(TCRA)后的应用效果。方法:选择收集2017年8月至2018年8月在郑州大学第三附属医院就诊并经宫腔镜检查确诊为中、重度宫腔粘连,近期有生育要求并愿意治疗和随访的患者60例,随机数字法分为两组:A组30例,术后放置宫腔三腔导管负压冲洗引流装置治疗;B组30例术后放置二腔球囊导管治疗。观察时间为术后6个月。比较两组患者术后再粘连率、内膜恢复情况、月经评分及妊娠率。结果:在二次宫腔镜探查时A组有效率为93.3%,B组为83.4%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);再粘连率分别为6.7%及16.7%。术后6个月A组内膜厚度及术后经量评分中位数值均高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月两组妊娠率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组阴道总引流液量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而宫腔感染率、脱管率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后应用宫腔三腔导管负压冲洗引流装置相比普通二腔球囊,可降低患者再粘连率,增加患者子宫内膜厚度,改善月经情况。     

中重度宫腔粘连分离术后三种方式预防复发的对比

目的 针对中重度宫腔粘连分离术后患者,比较宫腔扩张术与放置宫内节育器(IUD)、IUD联合防粘连剂这三种方式预防粘连复发的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析196例因中度及重度宫腔粘连行宫腔镜下粘连分离术(TCRA)患者,其中A组为宫腔扩张组(50例),B组为IUD组(42例),C组为IUD联合防粘连剂组(104例)。使用AFS评分评价宫腔粘连程度。所有患者均行第二次宫腔镜检查,比较三组患者AFS改善值、宫腔粘连复发率及随访1年内的妊娠率。结果 TCRA术后三组患者AFS改善值分别为(5.58±2.17)分、(5.29±2.62)分、(5.95±2.22)分,比较差异无统计学意义(F=1.374,P>0.05)。三组患者术后宫腔粘连复发率分别为42.0%、42.9%、30.8%,差异无统计学意义(χ²=2.861,P>0.05)。三组患者术后1年内妊娠率分别为48.1%、40.5%、31.7%,三组妊娠结局比较差异无统计学意义(χ²=2.890,P>0.05)。结论 中重度宫腔粘连分离术后,宫腔扩张术可替代传统的IUD及IUD联合防...     

中重度宫腔粘连术后放置COOK球囊和宫内节育器的疗效分析

目的:探讨中重度宫腔粘连(IUA)患者行宫腔镜下粘连分解术后放置COOK球囊及宫内节育器(IUD)后的月经改善、预防粘连复发及生育方面的疗效。方法:选取142例中重度宫腔粘连患者,随机分为COOK球囊组(65例)和IUD组(77例)。COOK球囊组:宫腔粘连分解术后放置COOK球囊,术后1周取出COOK球囊,术后1月再次行宫腔镜下探查术;IUD组:宫腔粘连分解术后放置元宫型IUD,术后1月取出并行宫腔镜下探查术。术后随访两组患者的粘连复发、月经改善及妊娠率。结果:COOK球囊组和IUD组的粘连复发率分别为12.3%(8/65)和27.3%(21/77),月经有效率分别为84.6%(55/65)和70.1%(54/77),两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P=0.036,P=0.048)。COOK球囊组和IUD组的术后妊娠率分别为61.5%(40/65)和53.2%(41/77),差异均无统计学意义(P=0.395)。结论:中重度IUA患者在宫腔镜粘连分解术后,放置COOK球囊比元宫型IUD能更有效地预防粘连复发和改善月经,术后妊娠率无明显差别。     

宫腔放水囊用于宫腔粘连术后的观察

目的：探讨宫腔粘连患者行宫腔镜下粘连电切术后官腔放置球囊尿管与传统的术后宫腔放宫内节育器的临床疗效与区别。方法：选取2012年5月至2013年5月我院共76例宫腔粘连患者,随机分为两组。研究组：40例,粘连电切术后宫腔放置球囊尿管＋戊酸雌二醇。对照组：36例,术后宫腔放宫内节育器＋戊酸雌二醇。观察术后六个月宫腔恢复及其他临床情况、月经改善、妊娠,术后再次粘连,体温、血象、腹痛不适等情况。结果：术后半年观察组有20例妊娠（妊娠率为52．63％）,对照组有9例妊娠（妊娠率28．13％）两组比较差异有统计学意义,P〈0．05。观察组无一例发生阴道出血,对照组有4例发生阴道出血。结论：宫腔粘连患者行宫腔镜下粘连电切术后宫腔放置球囊尿管＋戊酸雌二醇可起到局部压迫止血作用;同时术后再次粘连的发生率明显下降,尤其对于重度宫腔粘连患者;在月经及妊娠方面疗效确切,明显优于对照组,值得推广。     

COOK球囊联合医用几丁糖预防重度宫腔粘连术后再次宫腔粘连的临床分析

目的:探讨宫腔镜下重度宫腔粘连分离术后宫腔放置COOK球囊联合医用几丁糖对再次宫腔粘连的预防作用。方法:选择2013年6月至2016年6月在嘉兴市妇幼保健院治疗的重度宫腔粘连90例患者为研究对象,A组宫腔粘连分离术后宫腔放置医用几丁糖(30例),B组术后宫腔放置COOK球囊(30例),C组术后宫腔放置几丁糖加COOK球囊(30例),3组患者术后均人工周期修复内膜。术后2个月行二次宫腔探查,比较3组患者宫腔恢复情况、AFS评分改善率,半年后评估月经改善情况。结果:二次宫腔探查时A组再次宫腔粘连率为63.33%,B组再次宫腔粘连率为60.00%,C组再次宫腔粘连率为33.33%,A、B组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),C组与A、B组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。3组术后AFS评分改善率分别为(55.3±21.1)%、(55.5±21.7)%、(67.6±18.3)%,A、B组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),C组与A、B组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。3组月经改善率分别为66.67%,70.00%,93.33%,A、B组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),C组与A、B组比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:宫腔放置COOK球囊联合医用几丁糖的综合治疗方案能够有效预防重度宫腔粘连术后再次宫腔粘连,改善月经。     

重度宫腔粘连分离术后预防再粘连方法的比较

目的评估宫腔镜宫腔粘连分离术后预防宫腔再粘连方法的疗效。方法回顾性分析2004年11月至2007年5月间郑州大学第三附属医院妇科内镜诊治中心122例宫腔镜下宫腔粘连切除术患者的临床资料。术后宫腔内放置节育环(IUD)58例为IUD组,宫腔注入几丁糖并IUD64例为IUD+几丁糖组;根据病程长短将IUD组分为Ia组(病程≤1年)和Ib组(病程1年),IUD+几丁糖组分为IIa组(病程≤1年)和IIb组(病程1年)。观察术后宫腔恢复情况、月经改善及妊娠情况。结果IUD和IUD+几丁糖组术后宫腔再粘连率分别为41.4%和23.4%(P0.05),其中Ia组(19.0%)明显低于Ib组(54.1%)(P0.05);IUD组月经改善率及妊娠率分别为74.1%和29.3%,IUD+几丁糖组分别为92.2%和48.4%,IUD组明显低于IUD+几丁糖组(P0.05),其中Ia组(90.0%、47.6%)明显高于Ib组(64.9%、18.9%)(P0.05)。IIa组术后宫腔再粘连率及妊娠率分别为8.7%和78.3%,IIb组分别为31.7%和31.7%,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);IIa组(100%)月经改善率与IIb组(87.8%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论重度宫腔粘连切除术后宫腔内放置节育环加几丁糖可有效预防再粘连,提高月经改善率及妊娠率。     

7～8mm宫腔镜在重度宫腔粘连分离术后预防再粘连中的应用

目的评估重度宫腔粘连分离术后应用7～8mm宫腔镜定期监测在预防官腔再粘连中所起的作用。方法回顾性分析浙江省宁波市第六医院2009年6月至2012年5月宫腔镜下重度宫腔粘连分离术102例患者的临床资料,术后官腔先放置充水球囊后放IUD者53例为球囊放环组;闭经者术后每2周实施1次7～8mm宫腔镜监测,月结来潮者在月经干净3～7d监测1次官腔粘连情况,共49例为宫腔镜监测组。观察宫腔再粘连情况,并跟踪月经改善及妊娠情况。结果术后3个月球囊放环组官腔镜探查再次粘连率为26．42％,宫腔镜监测组为6．12％（P〈0．01）;两组月经改善情况分别为81.13％和95．92％（P〈0．05）;球囊放环组妊娠率33．96％,宫腔镜监测组妊娠率38．78％,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论重度宫腔粘连分离术后应用7～8mm宫腔镜定期监测可以有效预防再粘连,提高月经改善率,但未能显著提高妊娠率。     

人工流产及放置节育器术后子宫腔内微生物的消长

目的探讨人工流产及放置宫内节育器（ＩＵＤ）术后宫内解脲支原体（ＵＵ）、人型支原体（Ｍｈ）、Ｌ型菌（Ｌ型）、厌氧菌（Ａｎａ）和衣原体（ＣＴ）的消长规律。方法设人工流产、单纯放置ＩＵＤ、放置ＩＵＤ后用青霉素（放置ＩＵＤ＋青霉素）和放置ＩＵＤ后用洁霉素（放置ＩＵＤ＋洁霉素）４组,于术前及术后４个月经周期的经后１周内取宫内吸取物行ＵＵ、Ｍｈ、Ｌ型、Ａｎａ和ＣＴ５种微生物分离鉴定,只要能鉴别出１种,即判定为带菌者。结果术前４组带菌率无差异,术后至第１周期带菌率均最高,以后均为下降趋势,仅单纯放置ＩＵＤ组随周期递增呈线性下降（Ｐ＜０．００１）。人工流产组术后至第１周期与术前比较,差异无显著性（Ｐ＝０．１０５）。同一周期放置ＩＵＤ的３组间无差异,但术后各周期带菌率与术前相比,差异均有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）。结论ＩＵＤ存在是宫腔手术后持续带菌的主要因素,机体自然防御机制可清除宫内带菌。放ＩＵＤ后短期内小剂量应用青霉素或洁霉素不足以减少宫内带菌     

Ultrasound-guided intrauterine removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy

The risk to the embryo and to the mother when pregnancy results with an intrauterine device (IUD) in the uterus is well documented. Current advice in such cases is to remove the IUD if the string is visible; proper management when the string is not accessible is controversial. In four such cases, we were able to remove the IUDs from inside the uterine cavity using a small alligator forceps guided by high-resolution ultrasound. All four pregnancies progressed successfully to term. Based on the literature and our own experience, we recommend removal of IUDs or therapeutic abortion when pregnancy occurs with an IUD in situ.     

Microdose intrauterine progestagen associated with intrauterine contraceptive devices

This study investigated the response of the human female to a potent progestagen implanted in a Silastic capsule attached to an IUCD and inserted into the uterine cavity. Megestrol acetate's permeability was laboratory tested using tritiated material since the daily amount of progestagen eluted was too small to be determined by other methods. Polyethylene capsules with Silastic plugs allowed a daily elution into the surrounding bath of about 1% of the daily dose needed for satisfactory systemic contraceptive effect. Such capsules, loaded with 2.7 mcg of megestrol acetate, were attached to Maizlin Springs and used through 3 cycles of 3 months each for 5 patients. After removal the capsules were tested for residual progestagen by paper chromatography. All capsules still had residual medication after 3 month's use. Control tests were also done for preinsertion and postremoval cycles. Other contraceptive measures were used only during these control cycles. Continuous basal temperature records were obtained. During the 28 recorded cycles, 43 plasma progesterone tests, 42 urinary pregnanediol excretions, and 38 endometrila biopsies were obtained. No evidence of cyclic derangement was evidenced. All temperature records were biphasic. Ovulation was consistently confirmed. 1 patient developed acute endometritis during the second treatment cycle. This required premature removal of the IUCD. Studies are in progress to determine the highest intrauterine dosage which will cause no systemic effect but should make nidation impossible and thus protect completely against intrauterine pregnancy without the risks of other routes of aadministration.     

Effect of different types of intrauterine devices on intrauterine activity.

OBJECTIVE:To compare the effects of various IUDs on intrauterine activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 57 women volunteers aged 18 to 25 in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty of Istanbul University were included in the study. All were in good health and menstruating normally. The subjects were introduced to different types of IUDs on the fifth to eighth days of their menstrual cycle. Intrauterine activities with and without naproxen were recorded, for at least 20 minutes each time, with a micro-tip transducer before insertion, just after insertion, and 1 month later. RESULTS:Intrauterine activity increased just after insertion of both IUDs and disappeared 1 month later in copper-T wearing women, but persisted in multiload wearers. Naproxen seemed to be useful in preventing intrauterine activity caused by the IUD. CONCLUSIONS: The IUD itself causes an increase in intrauterine activity which is preventable by naproxen, suggesting the possible role of prostaglandins. Persistence of intrauterine activity depends upon the type of device. Optimal designing of IUDs is required to decrease side effects and make them more acceptable.     

The Soichet intrauterine device in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions.

IUD in the shape of a "Y" was inserted following curettage to 32 patients suffering from missed abortion or post-partum hemorrhage for the prevention of intrauterine adhesion formation, and to 48 patients suffering from sterility as a result of intrauterine adhesions. The rate of adhesion formation or recurrence of adhesions after their removal by curettage was very low and dropped significantly compared to other IUD's.     

The evaluation of 318 intrauterine pregnancy cases with an intrauterine device

Objective?To determine the factors affecting the pregnancies with intrauterine devices.

Design and Methods?The intrauterine device (IUD) locations in pregnancies with IUDs referring to SSK Aegean Maternity Hospital were determined by ultrasonography (USG) in a 6 year period. Three hundred and eighteen pregnancy cases (pregnancy group) were observed together with intrauterine devices. All intervally applied IUDs were CeT380A. All demographic characteristics of the cases together with determination of IUD localizations were recorded, and these cases were compared with 300 cases (control group) using CuT380A and under routine follow-up in our clinic.

Results?Ultrasonographic examination revealed IUD dislocation in 64% of 318 cases, whereas only 11% of the control group had dislocated IUDs. The difference between two groups was statistically significant. Especially in cases where the pregnancy group was less than 20 years old, IUD dislocations were recorded in 87.5%. The statistical analysis revealed a significant correlation in the distribution of IUD pregnancies according to years. When the demographic characteristics of two groups were compared, no statistically significant correlation was observed between the demographic characteristics and pregnancies with IUDs. There were 89 cases (27.9%) who decided on the continuation of IUD pregnancies. Unfortunately, 40% of these cases resulted in abortion. Only in 27% of 56 cases after IUD extraction because of IUD dislocation was miscarriage recorded. Meanwhile, 77% of the 26 cases with IUD left in the uterine cavity presented with miscarriage. Of the total of 36 miscarriages, 33% were ≤6 weeks pregnancy, and 27% were over 10 weeks.

Conclusion?IUD dislocation is a significant factor affecting IUD pregnancies. The fact that dislocation is most common in the first year reveals the necessity for more frequent controls in this period.