Organ motion and its management

PURPOSE: To compile and review data on the topic of organ motion and its management. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were classified into three categories: (a) patient position-related organ motion, (b) interfraction organ motion, and (c) intrafraction organ motion. Data on interfraction motion of gynecological tumors, the prostate, bladder, and rectum are reviewed. Literature pertaining to the intrafraction movement of the liver, diaphragm, kidneys, pancreas, lung tumors, and prostate is compiled. Methods for managing interfraction and intrafraction organ motion in radiation therapy are also reviewed.     

Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Although the interfraction motion of the prostate has been previously studied through the use of fiducial markers, CT scans, and ultrasound-based systems, intrafraction motion is not well documented. In this report, the B-mode, Acquisition, and Targeting (BAT) ultrasound system was used to measure intrafraction prostate motion during 200 intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) sessions for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty men receiving treatment with IMRT for clinically localized prostate cancer were selected for the study. Pre- and posttreatment BAT ultrasound alignment images were collected immediately before and after IMRT on 10 treatment days for a total of 400 BAT alignment procedures. Any ultrasound shifts of the prostate borders in relation to the planning CT scan were recorded in 3 dimensions: right-left (RL), anteroposterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI). Every ultrasound procedure was evaluated for image quality and alignment according to a 3-point grading scale. RESULTS: All the BAT images were judged to be of acceptable quality and alignment. The dominant directions of intrafraction prostate motion were anteriorly and superiorly. The mean magnitude of shifts (+/-SD) was 0.01 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.2 +/- 1.3 mm, and 0.1 +/- 1.0 mm in the left, anterior, and superior directions, respectively. The maximal range of motion occurred in the AP dimension, from 6.8 mm anteriorly to 4.6 mm posteriorly. The percentage of treatments during which prostate motion was judged to be 5 mm. The extent of intrafraction motion was much smaller than that of interfraction motion. Linear regression analysis showed very little correlation between the two types of motion (r = 0.014, 0.029, and 0.191, respectively) in the RL, AP, and SI directions. CONCLUSION: Using an ultrasound-based system, intrafraction prostate motion occurred predominantly in the anterior and superior directions, but was clinically insignificant. Intrafraction motion was much smaller than interfraction motion, and the two types of movement did not correlate.     

Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers

PURPOSE: To measure the interfraction and intrafraction motion of the prostate during the course of external beam radiotherapy using a video electronic portal imaging device and three-dimensional analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients underwent implantation with two or three gold markers in the prostate before five-angle/11-field conformal radiotherapy. Using CT data as the positional reference, multiple daily sets of portal images, and a three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm, intrafraction translations, as well as interfraction and intrafraction rotations, were analyzed along the three principal axes (left-right [LR], superoinferior [SI], and AP). The overall mean values and standard deviations (SDs), along with random and systematic SDs, were computed for these translations and rotations. RESULTS: For 282 intrafraction translational displacements, the random SD was 0.8 mm (systematic SD, 0.2) in the LR, 1.0 mm (systematic SD, 0.4) in the SI, and 1.4 mm (systematic SD, 0.7) in the AP axes. The analysis of 348 interfraction rotations revealed random SDs of 6.1 degrees (systematic SD, 5.6 degrees ) around the LR axis, 2.8 degrees (systematic SD, 2.4 degrees ) around the SI axis, and 2.0 degrees (systematic SD, 2.2 degrees ) around the AP axis. The intrafraction rotational motion observed during 44 fractions had a random SD of 1.8 degrees (systematic SD, 1.0 degrees ) around the LR, 1.1 degrees (systematic SD, 0.8 degrees ) around the SI, and 0.6 degrees (systematic SD, 0.3 degrees ) around the AP axis. CONCLUSION: The interfraction rotations observed were more important than those reported in previous studies. Intrafraction motion was generally smaller in magnitude than interfraction motion. However, the intrafraction rotations and translations of the prostate should be taken into account when designing planning target volume margins because their magnitudes are not negligible.     

The influence of a dietary protocol on cone beam CT-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of a dietary protocol on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality, which is an indirect indicator for short-term (intrafraction) prostate motion, and on interfraction motion. Image quality is affected by motion (e.g., moving gas) during imaging and influences the performance of automatic prostate localization on CBCT scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-six patients (336 CBCT scans) followed the dietary protocol and 23 patients (240 CBCT scans) did not. Prostates were automatically localized by using three dimensional (3D) gray-value registration (GR). Feces and (moving) gas occurrence in the CBCT scans, the success rate of 3D-GR, and the statistics of prostate motion data were assessed. RESULTS: Feces, gas, and moving gas significantly decreased from 55%, 61%, and 43% of scans in the nondiet group to 31%, 47%, and 28% in the diet group (all p < 0.001). Since there is a known relation between gas and short-term prostate motion, intrafraction prostate motion probably also decreased. The success rate of 3D-GR improved from 83% to 94% (p < 0.001). A decrease in random interfraction prostate motion also was found, which was not significant after Bonferroni's correction. Significant deviations from planning CT position for rotations around the left-right axis were found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The dietary protocol significantly decreased the incidence of feces and (moving) gas. As a result, CBCT image quality and the success rate of 3D-GR significantly increased. A trend exists that random interfraction prostate motion decreases. Using a dietary protocol therefore is advisable, also without CBCT-based image guidance.     

Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI)

PURPOSE: To quantify prostate motion during a radiation therapy treatment using cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) for time frames comparable to that expected in an image-guided radiation therapy treatment session (20-30 min). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer were imaged on 3 days, over the course of therapy (Weeks 1, 3, and 5). Four hundred images were acquired during the 1-h MRI session in 3 sagittal planes through the prostate at 6-s intervals. Eleven anatomic points of interest (POIs) have been used to characterize prostate/bony pelvis/abdominal wall displacement. Motion traces and standard deviation for each of the 11 POIs have been determined. The probability of displacement over time has also been calculated. RESULTS: Patients were divided into 2 groups according to rectal filling status: full vs. empty rectum. The displacement of POIs (standard deviation) ranged from 0.98 to 1.72 mm for the full-rectum group and from 0.68 to 1.04 mm for the empty-rectum group. The low standard deviations in position (2 mm or less) would suggest that these excursions have a low frequency of occurrence. The most sensitive prostate POI to rectal wall motion was the mid-posterior with a standard deviation of 1.72 mm in the full-rectum group vs. 0.79 mm in the empty-rectum group (p = 0.0001). This POI has a 10% probability of moving more than 3 mm in a time frame of approximately 1 min if the rectum is full vs. approximately 20 min if the rectum is empty. CONCLUSION: Motion of the prostate and seminal vesicles during a time frame similar to a standard treatment session is reduced compared to that reported in interfraction studies. The most significant predictor for intrafraction prostate motion is the status of rectal filling. A prostate displacement of <3 mm (90%) can be expected for the 20 min after the moment of initial imaging for patients with an empty rectum. This is not the case for patients presenting with full rectum. The determination of appropriate intrafraction margins in radiation therapy to accommodate the time-dependent uncertainty in positional targeting is a topic of ongoing investigations for the on-line image guidance model.     

A comparison of two immobilization systems for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors

Purpose

This study aims to compare the efficacy, efficiency and comfort level of two immobilization systems commonly used in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): the Bodyfix and the abdominal compression plate (ACP).

Materials and methods

Twenty-four patients undergoing SBRT for medically inoperable stage I lung cancer or pulmonary metastases were entered on this prospective randomized study. All underwent 4DCT simulation with free breathing, the Bodyfix, and the ACP to assess respiratory tumor motion. After CT simulation, patients were randomly assigned to immobilization with either the Bodyfix or the ACP for the actual SBRT treatment. Cone beam CTs (CBCTs) were acquired before and after each treatment to assess intrafraction tumor motion. Setup time and patient comfort were recorded.

Results

There were 16 upper lobe, two middle lobe and seven lower-lobe lesions. Both the Bodyfix and the ACP significantly reduced the superior-inferior (SI) and overall respiratory tumor motion compared to free breathing (4.6 and 4.0 vs 5.3 mm; 5.3 and 4.7 vs 6.1 mm, respectively, p < 0.05). The ACP further reduced the SI and overall respiratory tumor motion compared to the Bodyfix (p < 0.05). The mean overall intrafraction tumor motion was 2.3 mm with the Bodyfix and 2.0 mm with the ACP (p > 0.05). The ACP was faster to set up and rated more comfortable by patients than the Bodyfix (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

While there is no significant difference between the Bodyfix and ACP in reducing intrafraction tumor motion, the ACP is more comfortable, faster to set up, and superior to the Bodyfix in reducing SI and overall respiratory tumor motion.     

X-ray-assisted positioning of patients treated by conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of setup accuracy using implanted markers versus bony structures

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare setup accuracy of NovalisBody stereoscopic X-ray positioning using implanted markers in the prostate vs. bony structures in patients treated with dynamic conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Random and systematic setup errors (RE and SE) of the isocenter with regard to the center of gravity of three fiducial markers were measured by means of orthogonal verification films in 120 treatment sessions in 12 patients. Positioning was performed using NovalisBody semiautomated marker fusion. The results were compared with a control group of 261 measurements in 15 patients who were positioned with NovalisBody automated bone fusion. In addition, interfraction and intrafraction prostate motion was registered in the patients with implanted markers. RESULTS: Marker-based X-ray positioning resulted in a reduction of RE as well as SE in the anteroposterior, craniocaudal, and left-right directions compared with those in the control group. The interfraction prostate displacements with regard to the bony pelvis that could be avoided by marker positioning ranged between 1.6 and 2.8 mm for RE and between 1.3 and 4.3 mm for SE. Intrafraction random and systematic prostate movements ranged between 1.4 and 2.4 mm and between 0.8 and 1.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The problem of interfraction prostate motion can be solved by using implanted markers. In addition, the NovalisBody X-ray system performs more accurately with markers compared with bone fusion. Intrafraction organ motion has become the limiting factor for margin reduction around the clinical target volume.     

Intra- and interfraction breathing variations during curative radiotherapy for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed at quantifying the breathing variations among lung cancer patients over full courses of fractionated radiotherapy. The intention was to relate these variations to the margins assigned to lung tumours, to account for respiratory motion, in fractionated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven lung cancer patients were included in the study. The patients' chest wall motions were monitored as a surrogate measure for breathing motion during each fraction of radiotherapy by use of an external optical marker. The exhale level variations were evaluated with respect to exhale points and fraction-baseline, defined for intra- and interfraction variations respectively. The breathing amplitude was evaluated as breathing cycle amplitudes and fraction-max-amplitudes defined for intra- and interfraction breathing, respectively. RESULTS: The breathing variations over a full treatment course, including both intra- and interfraction variations, were 15.2mm (median over the patient population), range 5.5-26.7mm, with the variations in exhale level as the major contributing factor. The median interfraction span in exhale level was 14.8mm, whereas the median fraction-max-amplitude was 6.1mm (median of patient individual SD 1.4). The median intrafraction span in exhale level was 1.6mm, and the median breathing cycle amplitude was 4.0mm (median of patient individual SD 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: The variations in externally measured exhale levels are larger than variations in breathing amplitude. The interfraction variations in exhale level are in general are up to 10 times larger than intrafraction variations. Margins to account for respiratory motion cannot safely be based on one planning session, especially not if relying on measuring external marker motion. Margins for lung tumours should include interfraction variations in breathing.     

The reproducibility of organ position using active breathing control (ABC) during liver radiotherapy

Purpose: To evaluate the intrafraction and interfraction reproducibility of liver immobilization using active breathing control (ABC).

Methods and Materials: Patients with unresectable intrahepatic tumors who could comfortably hold their breath for at least 20 s were treated with focal liver radiation using ABC for liver immobilization. Fluoroscopy was used to measure any potential motion during ABC breath holds. Preceding each radiotherapy fraction, with the patient setup in the nominal treatment position using ABC, orthogonal radiographs were taken using room-mounted diagnostic X-ray tubes and a digital imager. The radiographs were compared to reference images using a 2D alignment tool. The treatment table was moved to produce acceptable setup, and repeat orthogonal verification images were obtained. The positions of the diaphragm and the liver (assessed by localization of implanted radiopaque intra-arterial microcoils) relative to the skeleton were subsequently analyzed. The intrafraction reproducibility (from repeat radiographs obtained within the time period of one fraction before treatment) and interfraction reproducibility (from comparisons of the first radiograph for each treatment with a reference radiograph) of the diaphragm and the hepatic microcoil positions relative to the skeleton with repeat breath holds using ABC were then measured. Caudal-cranial (CC), anterior-posterior (AP), and medial-lateral (ML) reproducibility of the hepatic microcoils relative to the skeleton were also determined from three-dimensional alignment of repeat CT scans obtained in the treatment position.

Results: A total of 262 fractions of radiation were delivered using ABC breath holds in 8 patients. No motion of the diaphragm or hepatic microcoils was observed on fluoroscopy during ABC breath holds. From analyses of 158 sets of positioning radiographs, the average intrafraction CC reproducibility (σ) of the diaphragm and hepatic microcoil position relative to the skeleton using ABC repeat breath holds was 2.5 mm (range 1.8–3.7 mm) and 2.3 mm (range 1.2–3.7 mm) respectively. However, based on 262 sets of positioning radiographs, the average interfraction CC reproducibility (σ) of the diaphragm and hepatic microcoils was 4.4 mm (range 3.0–6.1 mm) and 4.3 mm (range 3.1–5.7 mm), indicating a change of diaphragm and microcoil position relative to the skeleton over the course of treatment with repeat breath holds at the same phase of the respiratory cycle. The average population absolute intrafraction CC offset in diaphragm and microcoil position relative to skeleton was 2.4 mm and 2.1 mm respectively; the average absolute interfraction CC offset was 5.2 mm. Analyses of repeat CT scans demonstrated that the average intrafraction excursion of the hepatic microcoils relative to the skeleton in the CC, AP, and ML directions was 1.9 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.6 mm respectively and the average interfraction CC, AP, and ML excursion of the hepatic microcoils was 6.6 mm, 3.2 mm, and 3.3 mm respectively.

Conclusion: Radiotherapy using ABC for patients with intrahepatic cancer is feasible, with good intrafraction reproducibility of liver position using ABC. However, the interfraction reproducibility of organ position with ABC suggests the need for daily on-line imaging and repositioning if treatment margins smaller than those required for free breathing are a goal.     

Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion

PURPOSE: To analyze characteristics of intrafraction prostate motion, monitored using the Calypso system, and investigate dosimetric consequences of the motion for different clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Motion characteristics were analyzed for 1,267 tracking sessions and 35 patients. Using prostate-PTV margins of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 mm, dose metrics for the prostate gland, bladder, and rectum were evaluated for scenarios including patient population, individual patients showing the greatest motion during the course of treatment, and the individual session with the largest overall movement. Composite dose distributions incorporating motion blurring were calculated by convolving static intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans with corresponding motion probability functions. RESULTS: For prostate-PTV margins of 2 mm or greater, intrafraction motion did not compromise prostate dose coverage for either the patient population or individual patients. For the patient showing the largest overall movement, the prostate equivalent uniform dose was reduced by only 17.4 cGy (0.23%), and the minimum prostate dose remained greater than 95% of the nominal dose. For margins less than 2 mm, the prostate dose-volume histogram in the same patient was slightly compromised, and the equivalent uniform dose was reduced by 38.5 cGy (0.51%). Sparing of the bladder and rectum was improved substantially by reducing margins. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant motion can be observed during individual fractions, the dosimetric consequences are insignificant during a typical course of radiotherapy (30-40 fractions) with CTV-PTV margins of 2 mm or greater provided that the Calypso system is applied for pretreatment localization. Further reduction of the margin is possible if intrafraction realignment is performed.     

The impact of stool and gas volume on intrafraction prostate motion in patients undergoing radiotherapy with daily endorectal balloon

Purpose

The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of rectal stool/gas volumes on intrafraction prostate motion for patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy with daily endorectal balloon (ERB).

Methods

Total and anterior stool/gas rectal volumes were quantified in 30 patients treated with daily ERB. Real-time intrafraction prostate motion from 494 treatment sessions, at most 6 min in length, was evaluated using Calypso® tracking system.

Results

The deviation of prostate intrafraction motion distribution was a function of stool/gas volume, especially when stool/gas is located in the anterior part of the rectum. Compared to patients with small anterior stool/gas volumes (<10 cm³), those with large volume (10–60 cm³) had a twofold increase in 3D prostate motion and interquartile data range within the 6th minute of treatment time. The 10% of the overall CBCT session where large anterior rectal volumes were observed demonstrated larger percentage of time at displacement greater than our proposed internal margin 3 mm.

Conclusion

Volume and location of stool/gas can directly impact the ERB’s intrafraction immobilization ability. Although our patient preparation protocol and the 100 cm³ daily ERB effectively stabilized prostate motion for 90% of the fractions, a larger-sized ERB may improve prostate fixation for patients with greater and/or variable daily rectal volume.     

Three-dimensional evaluation of intra- and interfraction immobilization of lung and chest wall using active breathing control: a reproducibility study with breast cancer patients

PURPOSE: A CT-based three-dimensional (3D) method was used to analyze the intra- and interfraction reproducibility of lung immobilization during moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH), defined as 75% of the maximal inspiration using an active breathing control (ABC) apparatus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ABC apparatus was used to immobilize the breathing motion with a computer-controlled valve. Immobilization of the lungs in breast cancer patients was used as a model to evaluate the reproducibility of mDIBH using the ABC apparatus. CT scans were acquired twice at mDIBH in the same session for 30 breast cancer patients. Twenty-three of them were immobilized with an alpha-cradle, of which 14 had a repeat scan at mDIBH 1-4 weeks later. Twelve of those patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the left breast at mDIBH to displace the heart from the beam. The remaining patients were treated at free breathing, with either intensity-modulated irradiation to the whole breast or conformal partial breast irradiation. To remove the component of setup error, mDIBH scans were registered with respect to the vertebrae. The lungs and carina were auto-contoured to form 3D surfaces for each data set. The closest distance-to-agreement (DTA) for each point between the 3D surfaces of the corresponding CT scans was displayed on a 3D surface map. For analysis, each lung was divided along its inferior to superior extent into six regions, from the basal 10%, the next four consecutive 20% sections in height, to the last apical 10%. Likewise, the carina was divided into regions of the trachea and bifurcation. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the DTA for each of these regions was computed. RESULTS: With the patient positioned in an alpha-cradle, the mean +/- SD intrafraction DTA was 1.5 +/- 1.4 mm for the left lung and 1.0 +/- 1.4 mm for the right lung. The corresponding values without the use of an alpha-cradle were significantly greater, with 1.9 +/- 2.1 mm and 2.2 +/- 2.2 mm for the left and right lung, respectively (p <0.005 for the SD of the left lung and p <0.0003 for the SD of the right lung). The interfraction DTA for the left and right lungs was 1.4 +/- 1.7 mm and 1.4 +/- 1.6 mm, respectively. The regional analysis demonstrated better immobilization for the upper two-thirds of the chest wall compared with that for the lung base. The DTA values obtained for the tracheal bifurcation were 0.9 +/- 0.8 mm for intrafraction and 1.4 +/- 1.0 mm for interfraction. CONCLUSION: The ABC device can be used to reduce respiratory motion at mDIBH in breast cancer patients or those patients who can perform the maneuver. This device demonstrated excellent intra- and interfraction reproducibility of chest wall and carina immobilization, especially when combined with alpha-cradle immobilization. Internal margins for suspended breathing can be extrapolated from these data for various anatomic regions within the lung and chest wall.     

Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers

PURPOSE: To analyze the intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy of patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 2001-December 2005, 427 patients with Stage T3Nx/0Mx/0 prostate carcinoma received intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment combined with position verification with fiducial gold markers. For a total of 11,426 treatment fractions (average, 27 per patient), portal images were taken of the first segment of all five beams. The irradiation time of the technique varied between 5-7 min. From these data, the location of gold markers could be established within every treatment beam under the assumption of minimal marker movement. RESULTS: In 66% of treatment fractions, a motion outside a range of 2 mm was observed, with 28% outside a range of 3 mm. The intrafraction marker movements showed that motion directions were often reversed. However, the effect was small. Even with perfect online position-correction at the start of irradiation, intrafraction motion caused position uncertainty, but systematic errors (Sigma) were limited to <0.6 mm, and random errors (sigma) to <0.9 mm. This would result in a lower limit of 2 mm for margins, in the absence of any other uncertainties. CONCLUSIONS: Intrafraction motion of the prostate occurs frequently during external-beam irradiation on a time scale of 5-7 min. Margins of 2 mm account for these intrafraction motions. However, larger margins are required in practice to accommodate other uncertainties in the treatment.     

Influence of intrafraction motion on margins for prostate radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of intrafraction intervention on margins for prostate radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven supine prostate patients with three implanted transponders were studied. The relative transponder positions were monitored for 8 min and combined with previously measured data on prostate position relative to skin marks. Margins were determined for situations of (1) skin-based positioning, and (2) pretreatment transponder positioning. Intratreatment intervention was simulated assuming conditions of (1) continuous tracking, and (2) a 3-mm threshold for position correction. RESULTS: For skin-based setup without and with inclusion of intrafraction motion, prostate treatments would have required average margins of 8.0, 7.3, and 10.0 mm and 8.2, 10.2, and 12.5 mm, about the left-right, anterior-posterior, and cranial-caudal directions, respectively. Positioning by prostate markers at the start of the treatment fraction reduced these values to 1.8, 5.8, and 7.1 mm, respectively. Interbeam adjustment further reduced margins to an average of 1.4, 2.3, and 1.8 mm. Intrabeam adjustment yielded margins of 1.3, 1.5, and 1.5 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant reductions in margins might be achieved by repositioning the patient before each beam, either radiographically or electromagnetically. However, 2 of the 11 patients would have benefited from continuous target tracking and threshold-based intervention.     

Daily electronic portal imaging of implanted gold seed fiducials in patients undergoing radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to measure interfraction prostate bed motion, setup error, and total positioning error in 10 consecutive patients undergoing postprostatectomy radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily image-guided target localization and alignment using electronic portal imaging of gold seed fiducials implanted into the prostate bed under transrectal ultrasound guidance was used in 10 patients undergoing adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy. Prostate bed motion, setup error, and total positioning error were measured by analysis of gold seed fiducial location on the daily electronic portal images compared with the digitally reconstructed radiographs from the treatment-planning CT. RESULTS: Mean (+/- standard deviation) prostate bed motion was 0.3 +/- 0.9 mm, 0.4 +/- 2.4 mm, and -1.1 +/- 2.1 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) axes, respectively. Mean set-up error was 0.1 +/- 4.5 mm, 1.1 +/- 3.9 mm, and -0.2 +/- 5.1 mm in the LR, SI, and AP axes, respectively. Mean total positioning error was 0.2 +/- 4.5 mm, 1.2 +/- 5.1 mm, and -0.3 +/- 4.5 mm in the LR, SI, and AP axes, respectively. Total positioning errors >5 mm occurred in 14.1%, 38.7%, and 28.2% of all fractions in the LR, SI, and AP axes, respectively. There was no significant migration of the gold marker seeds. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the use of daily image-guided target localization and alignment using electronic portal imaging of implanted gold seed fiducials as a valuable method to correct for interfraction target motion and to improve precision in the delivery of postprostatectomy radiotherapy.     

主动呼吸控制用于原发性肝癌放射治疗肝脏位置重复性的研究

背景与目的：呼吸运动能造成肝癌放疗靶区的扩大,限制了放疗剂量的增加.主动呼吸控制（active breathing control,ABC）提供了一种减少呼吸运动的简便方法,肝脏位置重复性较好是使用ABC技术减少靶区边界外放的一个重要前题,然而对使用该技术放疗过程中深吸气后肝脏位置的重复性目前尚不明确,因此本研究对ABC用于原发性肝癌放疗肝脏位置的重复性进行了测量.方法：入组本研究的患者共20人,其中16例肝癌碘油沉积良好.所有的患者进行了ABC呼吸训练和ABC控制下的放射治疗.在常规模拟机透视下测量一次屏气过程肝脏位置的稳定性和通过5次反复屏住吸气表示的一次放疗中肝脏位置的重复性.每周用兆伏级X线电子射野影像仪拍摄验证片与放疗计划生成的数字重建图像（digital reconstruction radiograph,DRR）比较测量分次放疗间肝脏位置在头脚方向上的重复性,通过每周在模拟机下体模固定在治疗体位拍摄正、侧位X线片,测量碘油在前后和左右位置上距离脊柱垂直距离的变化值,计算肝脏位置在这两个方向上的重复性.结果：所有患者配合良好,均能全程耐受ABC放疗屏气,没有1例因为不能耐受中断放疗.在平静呼吸状态下,患者膈在头脚方向上运动幅度平均为1.6 cm（范围：1.0～2.6 cm）.在透视下测得一次屏气过程中肝脏上下移动幅度平均为1.3 mm（范围：0.0～2.9 mm）.使用ABC放疗时一次放疗中和分次放疗间肝脏位置在头脚方向上的重复性（标准差）分别为1.6 mm和6.6 mm,前后方向上的重复性分别为0.9 mm和4.2 mm,左右方向上的重复性分别为0.7 mm和5.5 mm.结论：应用主动呼吸控制技术对入选的原发性肝癌患者放疗时肝脏的位置重复性良好.分次放疗间的重复性要差于一次放疗中的.安全的减少计划靶区的外扩需要结合影像引导的放疗并且要考虑肝脏位置的重复性.     

The long- and short-term variability of breathing induced tumor motion in lung and liver over the course of a radiotherapy treatment

Purpose

To evaluate the short and long-term variability of breathing induced tumor motion.

Validation of supervised automated algorithm for fast quantitative evaluation of organ motion on magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE: To validate a correlation coefficient template-matching algorithm applied to the supervised automated quantification of abdominal-pelvic organ motion captured on time-resolved magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Magnetic resonance images of 21 patients across four anatomic sites were analyzed. Representative anatomic points of interest were chosen as surrogates for organ motion. The point of interest displacements across each image frame relative to baseline were quantified manually and through the use of a template-matching software tool, termed "Motiontrack." Automated and manually acquired displacement measures, as well as the standard deviation of intrafraction motion, were compared for each image frame and for each patient. RESULTS: Discrepancies between the automated and manual displacements of > or =2 mm were uncommon, ranging in frequency of 0-9.7% (liver and prostate, respectively). The standard deviations of intrafraction motion measured with each method correlated highly (r = 0.99). Considerable interpatient variability in organ motion was demonstrated by a wide range of standard deviations in the liver (1.4-7.5 mm), uterus (1.1-8.4 mm), and prostate gland (0.8-2.7 mm). The automated algorithm performed successfully in all patients but 1 and substantially improved efficiency compared with manual quantification techniques (5 min vs. 60-90 min). CONCLUSION: Supervised automated quantification of organ motion captured on magnetic resonance imaging using a correlation coefficient template-matching algorithm was efficient, accurate, and may play an important role in off-line adaptive approaches to intrafraction motion management.     

Time dependence of intrafraction patient motion assessed by repeat stereoscopic imaging

PURPOSE: To quantify intrafraction patient motion and its time dependence in immobilized intracranial and extracranial patients. The data can be used to optimize the intrafraction imaging frequency and consequent patient setup correction with an image guidance and tracking system, and to establish the required safety margins in the absence of such a system. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The intrafraction motion of 32 intracranial patients, immobilized with a thermoplastic mask, and 11 supine- and 14 prone-treated extracranial spine patients, immobilized with a vacuum bag, were analyzed. The motion was recorded by an X-ray, stereoscopic, image-guidance system. For each group, we calculated separately the systematic (overall mean and SD) and the random displacement as a function of elapsed intrafraction time. RESULTS: The SD of the systematic intrafraction displacements increased linearly over time for all three patient groups. For intracranial-, supine-, and prone-treated patients, the SD increased to 0.8, 1.2, and 2.2 mm, respectively, in a period of 15 min. The random displacements for the prone-treated patients were significantly higher than for the other groups, namely 1.6 mm (1 SD), probably caused by respiratory motion. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the applied immobilization devices, patients drift away from their initial position during a treatment fraction. These drifts are in general small if compared with conventional treatment margins, but will significantly contribute to the margin for high-precision radiation treatments with treatment times of 15 min or longer.     

Evaluation of respiratory movement during gated radiotherapy using film and electronic portal imaging

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial system(1) in reducing respiration-induced treatment uncertainty by gating the radiation delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The gating system considered here measures respiration from the position of a reflective marker on the patient's chest. Respiration-triggered planning CT scans were obtained for 8 patients (4 lung, 4 liver) at the intended phase of respiration (6 at end expiration and 2 at end inspiration). In addition, fluoroscopic movies were recorded simultaneously with the respiratory waveform. During the treatment sessions, gated localization films were used to measure the position of the diaphragm relative to the vertebral bodies, which was compared to the reference digitally reconstructed radiograph derived from the respiration-triggered planning CT. Variability was quantified by the standard deviation about the mean position. We also assessed the interfraction variability of soft tissue structures during gated treatment in 2 patients using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device. RESULTS: The gated localization films revealed an interfraction patient-averaged diaphragm variability of 2.8 +/- 1.0 mm (error bars indicate standard deviation in the patient population). The fluoroscopic data yielded a patient-averaged intrafraction diaphragm variability of 2.6 +/- 1.7 mm. With no gating, this intrafraction excursion became 6.9 +/- 2.1 mm. In gated localization films, the patient-averaged mean displacement of the diaphragm from the planning position was 0.0 +/- 3.9 mm. However, in 4 of the 8 patients, the mean (over localization films) displacement was >4 mm, indicating a systematic displacement in treatment position from the planned one. The position of soft tissue features observed in portal images during gated treatments over several fractions showed a mean variability between 2.6 and 5.7 mm. The intrafraction variability, however, was between 0.6 and 1.4 mm, indicating that most of the variability was due to patient setup errors rather than to respiratory motion. CONCLUSIONS: The gating system evaluated here reduces the intra- and interfraction variability of anatomy due to respiratory motion. However, systematic displacements were observed in some cases between the location of an anatomic feature at simulation and its location during treatment. Frequent monitoring is advisable with film or portal imaging.