Do racial or socioeconomic disparities exist in lung cancer treatment?

BACKGROUND:

Determine the effects of race, socioeconomic status, and treatment on outcomes for patients diagnosed with lung cancer.

METHODS:

The Florida cancer registry and inpatient and ambulatory data were queried for patients diagnosed from 1998‐2002.

RESULTS:

A total 76,086 of lung cancer patients were identified. Overall, 55.6% were male and 44.4% were female. The demographic distribution of patients was 92.7% Caucasian, 6.7% African American, and 5.7% Hispanic. The mean age of diagnosis was 70 years old. African American patients presented at a younger age, with more advanced disease, and were less likely to undergo surgical therapy than their Caucasian counterparts. Median survival time (MST) for the entire cohort was 8.7 months, while MST for African American patients was 7.5 months. Patients who received surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy demonstrated significantly improved outcomes. Stepwise multivariate analysis revealed that African American race was no longer a statistically significant predictor of worse outcomes once corrections were made for demographics and comorbid conditions, suggesting that the originally reported disparities in lung cancer outcomes and race may be in part because of poor pretreatment performance status. In contrast, patients of the lowest socioeconomic status continue to have a slightly worse overall prognosis than their affluent counterparts (hazard ratio = 1.05, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Lung cancer continues to carry a poor prognosis for all patients. Once comorbidities are corrected for, African American patients carry equivalently poor outcomes. Nonetheless, emphasis must be placed on improving pretreatment performance status among African American patients and efforts for earlier diagnosis among the impoverished patients must be made. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Treatment and relapse of interstitial lung disease in nivolumab-treated patients with non–small cell lung cancer

Nivolumab, a human monoclonal antibody against programmed death-1, is approved for the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although nivolumab is generally well tolerated, it can cause interstitial lung disease (ILD), a rare but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event. Currently, there are limited data available on the treatment of nivolumab-induced ILD and its outcome. This retrospective cohort study based on a post–marketing study described the treatment of nivolumab-induced ILD and its outcome in NSCLC patients in Japan through the assessment of clinical and chest imaging findings by an expert central review committee. Treatment details for patients who experienced a relapse of ILD were also analyzed. Of the 238 patients identified as having nivolumab-induced ILD, 37 patients died of ILD. Corticosteroids were used in 207 (87.0%) patients. Of those, 172 (83.1%) patients responded well and survived and 35 (16.9%) died (most died during corticosteroid treatment). A total of nine patients experienced a relapse; at the time of relapse, four patients were taking nivolumab. Of those who were receiving corticosteroids at the time of relapse, three of four patients were taking low doses or had nearly completed dose tapering. All patients (except one, whose treatment was unknown) received corticosteroids for the treatment of relapse, but one patient died. Patients with NSCLC who experience nivolumab-induced ILD are treated effectively with corticosteroids, and providing extra care when ceasing or reducing the corticosteroid dose may prevent relapse of ILD.     

Perioperative considerations in patients with non small cell lung cancer and metastases in mediastinal lymph nodes

Since the latest revision of the TNM system reclassified T3N0 tumours into the ⅡB stage, N2 lesions became the major determinant of the ⅢA stage. Concerning the minority of patients with T3N1 tumours in this stage,     

Inhibitors of the EGFR pathway in non small cell lung cancer: what's new in 2007?

Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major health public issue because of its frequency and related mortality. Progress with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC has reached a plateau and more effective and better tolerated therapeutic strategies are needed. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 80% of NSCLC and inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase have now an important place in the management of NSCLC. Most significant results have been obtained with oral inhibitors like erlotinib or gefitinib. Erlotinib role in second and third line setting is firmly established. Recent data suggests that in the first line setting, interesting overall response rates improving survivals can be obtained, in specific subpopulations defined either by histology (adenocarcinomas, adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar features), sex (women), non-smoking status (never-smokers) or biological markers (tumours with EGFR mutations in exons 18-21). Such improvements are especially valuable because inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase are better tolerated than chemotherapy. The exact contribution of monoclonal antibodies like cetuximab is still unclear in NSCLC.     

Management of stage III non–small cell lung cancer

Optimal management of patients with locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer remains challenging in the context of this heterogeneous disease. Despite aggressive therapeutic approaches, survival benefits are still unsatisfactory for what might be viewed as a localized malignancy. A combined modality approach offers patients superior outcomes, especially because technological advances and refined surgical procedures now provide better results with fewer complications. Nevertheless, several features of therapy remain controversial and lack formal prospective data. Traditional cytotoxic chemoradiation therapy may have reached a plateau and future perspectives opting to integrate molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy might be the way to improve outcomes in this disease subset.     

A case of non–small cell lung cancer with danazol-dependent aplastic anemia induced by pembrolizumab

Programmed cell death protein 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor is an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Although hematological immune-related adverse events induced by antiprogrammed-cell-death-protein-1 immunotherapy have been reported, they are rare, and there remain many unknowns. We report the case of a 77-year-old woman with non–small cell lung cancer and pembrolizumab-induced danazol-dependent aplastic anemia. Sixteen days after she received pembrolizumab with carboplatin and pemetrexed as first-line treatments, she developed pancytopenia, including severe thrombocytopenia (1 × 10⁹/L) with oral bleeding, epistaxis, and systemic purpura. We initially diagnosed immune-related thrombocytopenia based on an elevated level of platelet-associated immunoglobulin G (922ng/10⁷ cells), but her thrombocytopenia was refractory to prednisolone (1mg/kg) and thrombopoietin receptor agonists. We eventually diagnosed aplastic anemia based on the findings of bone marrow hypoplasia. Treatment with cyclosporine and danazol 300mg (7.5mg/kg) was initiated. Eighteen days later, her blood cell count increased, and we reduced danazol to 100mg. Twenty-four days after the reduction of danazol, her platelet count dropped again to 14 × 10⁹/L; subsequently, increasing danazol improved her platelet count in a few days. Although aplastic anemia was recovered, she died owing to lung cancer progression. In this case, the thrombocytopenia was noticeable initially; however, pancytopenia appeared a month later, and we diagnosed her with aplastic anemia. Platelet counts improved rapidly with the use of danazol. No effective treatment has yet been established for aplastic anemia induced by antiprogrammed-cell-death-protein-1 immunotherapy, but our case suggests that danazol is an effective therapy.