T790M mutation is associated with better efficacy of treatment beyond progression with EGFR-TKI in advanced NSCLC patients

Background and purpose

Continuous EGFR-TKI treatment beyond progression has shown promising benefit for some patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of secondary T790M mutation at the time of progression with the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment beyond progression.

Methods

From March 2011 to March 2013, patients with advanced NSCLC who developed acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI and where a re-biopsy was performed at Tongji University Cancer Institute were included into this study. Scorpion ARMS was used to detect EGFR mutation status.

Results

A total of 54 patients were enrolled in this study with a median progression-free survival time (PFS1) of 10.9 months according to RECIST criteria. In all, 53.7% (29/54) had T790M mutation after the failure of EGFR-TKIs; PFS1 was not statistically significantly different between patients with T790M mutation and without (13.0 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.894). In all, 41 patients received TKI treatment beyond progression, including 22 with local progression to receive additional local therapy and 19 with gradual progression to receive additional chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival time (PFS2) of patients who received EGFR-TKI beyond progression treatment was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.689–4.311). Patients with T790M mutation had significantly longer PFS2 (6.3 vs. 2.6 months, p = 0.002) and overall survival (39.8 vs. 23.2 months, p = 0.044) than those without.

Conclusion

Patients with secondary T790M mutation at the time of progression having gradual or local progression after acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI benefit more from EGFR-TKI treatment beyond progression compared to those without T790M mutation.     

Association Between EGFR T790M Status and Progression Patterns During Initial EGFR-TKI Treatment in Patients Harboring EGFR Mutation

Background

Emergence of the T790M point mutation in exon 20 of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most common mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between T790M mutation status and the progression patterns during EGFR-TKI treatment.

Novel therapeutic strategies for patients with NSCLC that do not respond to treatment with EGFR inhibitors

Introduction

Treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) yields tumour responses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbouring activating EGFR mutations. However, even in long-lasting responses, resistance to EGFR TKIs invariably occurs.

Areas covered

This review examines resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKI treatment, which mainly arise from secondary EGFR mutations. Other resistance-inducing processes include mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor (MET) amplification, epithelial–mesenchymal transformation, phenotypic change from NSCLC to small-cell lung carcinoma, and modifications in parallel signalling pathways. Current therapeutic strategies to overcome these EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms focus on the inhibition or blocking of multiple members of the ErbB family. Several molecules which target multiple ErbB receptors are being investigated in NSCLC and other indications including afatinib, an ErbB Family Blocker, as well as dacomitinib and lapatinib. Novel, non-quinazoline, EGFR inhibitors, that also target EGFR activating and resistance (T790M) mutations, are currently under clinical development. Other therapeutic strategies include inhibition of parallel and downstream pathways, using agents which target heat shock protein (HSP)90 or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in addition to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), monoclonal antibodies against the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, and fulvestrant-mediated oestrogen receptor regulation.

Conclusion

Improved understanding of mechanisms underlying resistance to EGFR TKIs emphasises the importance of a genotype-guided approach to therapy. Elucidation of resistance mechanisms is indeed crucial to target innovative therapeutic approaches and to improve the efficacy of anticancer regimes in NSCLC.     

Afatinib in the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC – A network meta-analysis

Objectives

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a specific lung cancer subtype characterized by sensitivity to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Two reversible EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib) and the irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib are currently approved for treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, but no head-to-head trials have been reported to date. We aimed to assess the relative efficacy of the three drugs by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Materials and methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all the available evidence. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. For PFS, results by investigator review were considered as not all trials assessed PFS independently. Results were analyzed using Bayesian methods.

Results

The literature search identified 246 articles that were assessed for eligibility, of which 21 studies were included in the NMA, including eight trials performed in an EGFR mutation-positive population. The estimated PFS HR (95% credible interval, CrI) for afatinib compared with gefitinib was 0.70 (0.40–1.16) and compared with erlotinib was 0.86 (0.50–1.50) in the total population. The estimated probability of being best for afatinib over all other treatments for PFS was 70% versus 27% for erlotinib and 3% for gefitinib; the estimated probability of chemotherapy being the best treatment was 0%. Estimated HR (95% CrI) in patients with common mutations was 0.73 (0.42–1.24) for afatinib compared with erlotinib and 0.60 (0.34–0.99) for afatinib compared with gefitinib. OS findings were not significantly different between treatments.

Conclusions

In the absence of direct head-to-head trial data comparing efficacy between the three EGFR TKIs, our analysis suggests that afatinib is a viable treatment alternative to erlotinib or gefitinib in terms of PFS. A direct trial-based comparison of the efficacy of these agents is warranted to clarify their relative benefits.     

Afatinib and Cetuximab in Four Patients With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion–Positive Advanced NSCLC

Introduction

EGFR exon 20 insertions comprise 4% to 9% of EGFR mutated NSCLC. Despite being an oncogenic driver, they are associated with primary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We hypothesized that dual EGFR blockade with afatinib, an irreversible EGFR TKI, and cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR, could induce tumor responses.

Continuation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment prolongs disease control in non-small-cell lung cancers with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Objectives

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) after tumor regression. No approved targeted therapies are currently available after initial EGFR TKI treatment. This study investigated the efficacy of continuing EGFR TKI therapy with local treatments for patients with NSCLC and local progression or minimal/slow progression on TKI therapy.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-five patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs and developed acquired resistance to the drug were included. Initial response to target therapy, median progression free survival (PFS1), progression pattern, and first progression site were assessed. Median progression free survival to physician assessment progression (PFS2) and difference between PFS1 and PFS2 (PFS difference) were also recorded.

Results and Conclusion

PFS1 was 11.2 months, PFS2 was 20.3 months, and PFS difference was 8.3 months. Nineteen patients (34.5%) who manifested progression received local therapy, and 16 (28.6%) underwent rebiopsy after progression with six positive EGFR T790M mutations detected. Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that only the first line of treatment was significantly correlated with PFS difference. NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs could benefit from the same TKI therapy through months to years of disease control.     

Incidence of T790M mutation in (sequential) rebiopsies in EGFR-mutated NSCLC-patients

Aim

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-patients with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation have median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12 months on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Resistance is mediated by the EGFR T790M-mutation in the majority of patients. Longitudinal follow-up data are lacking. We retrospectively evaluated EGFR-mutated NSCLC-patients who were rebiopsied after TKI-treatment. A subgroup was sequentially rebiopsied along the course of the disease.

Patients and methods

Advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC-patients who had both a pre-TKI biopsy and post-TKI biopsy available were included. Information on treatments and (re)biopsies was collected chronologically. Primary endpoint was the incidence of the T790M-mutation.

Results

Sixty-six patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In first post-TKI biopsies, T790M-mutation was detected in 34 patients (52%) of patients. Twenty-seven patients had subsequent post-TKI rebiopsies with mutation analysis available; in 10 patients (37%) the T790M-status in subsequent post-TKI rebiopsies was not consistent with the T790M-status of the first post-TKI biopsy. Progression free survival (PFS) on TKI-treatment was 12.0 months. Objective response rate on TKI-treatment was 81%. Patients developing T790M-mutation at post-TKI biopsy had longer median PFS compared to T790M-negative patients (14.2 versus 11.1 months respectively (P = 0.034)) and longer overall survival (45.9 months versus 29.8 months respectively (P = 0.213)). Transformation to SCLC was detected in 1 patient (2%).

Conclusion

Incidence of T790M-mutation at first post-TKI biopsy in this cohort of EGFR-mutated NSCLC-patients was 52%. Detection of T790M-mutation was not consistent over time; some patients who were T790M-positive at first post-TKI biopsy became T790M-negative in later post-TKI rebiopsies and vice versa. T790M-positive patients showed longer PFS than T790M-negative patients. Whether the low incidence of transformation to SCLC is justifying post-TKI rebiopsy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC-patients with acquired TKI-resistance in regular clinical practice is debatable.     

Activity of the EGFR-HER2 Dual Inhibitor Afatinib in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Patients With Acquired Resistance to Reversible EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of afatinib in EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with afatinib after failure of chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs.ResultsA total of 96 individuals were included in the study. According to EGFR status, most patients (n = 63; 65.6%) harbored a deletion in exon 19, and de novo T790M mutation was detected in 2 cases (T790M and exon 19). Twenty-four (25%) patients underwent repeated biopsy immediately before starting afatinib and secondary T790M was detected in 8 (33%) samples. Among the 86 patients evaluable for efficacy, response rate was 11.6%, with a median progression free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.9 and 7.3 months, respectively. No significant difference in PFS and OS was observed according to type of last therapy received before afatinib, type of EGFR mutation or adherence to Jackman criteria, and patients benefiting from afatinib therapy had longer PFS and OS (P < .001). Outcome results for repeated biopsy patients were similar to the whole population, with no evidence of response in T790M-positive patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 81% experienced an AE of any grade, with grade 3 to 4 AEs, mainly diarrhea and skin toxicity, occurring in 19 (20%) patients.ConclusionOur results showed that afatinib has only modest efficacy in a real life population of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib.     

Discovery of a Potent and Mutant-Selective EGFR Inhibitor that Overcomes T790M-Mediated Resistance in Lung Cancer

Background

Despite remarkable activity in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer patients, the clinical efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is limited by the emergence of acquired resistance, which is mostly caused by a secondary T790M mutation. Fortunately, newly developed, mutant-selective EGFR-TKIs against T790M have been proven as an effective therapeutic approach although only osimertinib has received the FDA approval until now.

Objective

To determine the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a new EGFR TKI, OBX1-012 in cells with mutant EGFR.

Methods

Effects of OBX1-012 on cellular viability and EGFR-related signaling were determined in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, including cells harboring T790M mutations. In addition, in vivo efficacy of OBX1-012 was evaluated in xenograft models.

Results

We report the discovery and preclinical assessment of another novel, mutant-selective EGFR-TKI, OBX1-012. Compared with other mutant-selective EGFR-TKIs such as olumitinib and osimertinib, it showed similar potency and selectivity for mutant EGFR. OBX1-012 treatment was highly effective against human EGFR-mutant lung cancer models with or without EGFR T790M, not only in vitro but also in vivo. However, OBX1-012 like other EGFR-TKIs failed to exhibit efficacy for the exon 20 insertion mutation or C797S mutation, which was generated by site-directed mutagenesis and stable transfection of Ba/F3 cells.

Conclusions

These results identify OBX1-012 as a highly effective, mutant-selective EGFR-TKI for the treatment of T790M-mediated resistance in NSCLC.

     

Therapeutic Efficacy Comparison of 5 Major EGFR-TKIs in Advanced EGFR-positive Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trials

Background

Five major first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, afatinib, and dacomitinib, are currently optional for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor EGFR mutations. However, there was no head-to-head-based network meta-analysis among all the TKIs in EGFR-mutated populations.

Incidence of T790M in Patients With NSCLC Progressed to Gefitinib,Erlotinib, and Afatinib: A Study on Circulating Cell-free DNA

BackgroundInsights into the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could provide important information for further patient management, including the choice of second-line treatment. The EGFR T790M mutation is the most common mechanism of resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. Owing to its biologic relevance in the response of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the selective pressure of treatment, the present study investigated whether the occurrence of T790M at progression differed among patients receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib.Patients and MethodsThe present retrospective study included patients with NSCLC with an EGFR activating mutation, who had received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib as first-line treatment. Plasma samples for the analysis of cell-free DNA were taken at disease progression and analyzed using a digital droplet polymerase chain reaction EGFR mutation assay.ResultsA total of 83 patients were enrolled; 42 had received gefitinib or erlotinib and 41afatinib. The patient characteristics were comparable across the 2 groups. The median time to progression (TTP) was 14.4 months for the gefitinib and erlotinib group and 10.2 months for the afatinib group (P = .09). Of the 83 patients, 47 (56.6%) were positive for the T790M in plasma. A greater incidence of T790M was observed in patients with progression during gefitinib or erlotinib therapy compared with patients treated with afatinib (33 [79%] vs. 14 [34%], respectively; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-18.5; P = .0001).ConclusionsAlthough gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib showed a comparable TTP in patients receiving first-line therapy, the incidence of T790M differed among them, as demonstrated by the present study, which could have implications for the choice of second-line treatment.     

Treatment Options for EGFR T790M-Negative EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The introduction of first- and second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib) for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically improved patients’ prognosis and quality of life (QoL). Unfortunately, after an initial and sometimes durable benefit from EGFR-TKI therapy, all patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer eventually become resistant to the treatment and experience disease progression. In approximately 50% of these patients, genomic alterations in the EGFR kinase domain resulting in the mutant T790M are responsible for the resistance and this has led to the development of novel EGFR inhibitors active against mutant-T790M EGFR. The remaining 50% of patients with acquired resistance (AR) to EGFR-TKIs do not harbour the T790M mutation. In these cases, other mechanisms are involved in the development of AR such as perturbations of downstream pathways (e.g. K-RAS mutations), activation of alternative bypassing pathways (including c-Met, AXL, PIK3CA, BRAF), or histologic transformation. This review summarizes the main treatment strategies for this particular and heterogeneous group of “T790M-negative” patients.

Open image in new window

     

Audit of Molecular Mechanisms of Primary and Secondary Resistance to Various Generations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Known Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Centre

AimsPresently, three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved against oncogene addicted EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with actionable EGFR mutations invariably develop resistance. This resistance can be intrinsic (primary) or acquired (secondary).Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study carried out between January 2016 and April 2021 analysing 486 samples of NSCLC for primary and secondary resistance to first- (erlotinib, gefitinb), second- (afatinib) and/or third-generation (osimertinib) TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs by next generation sequencing (NGS). Tissue NGS was carried out using the Thermofischer Ion Torrent? Oncomine? Focus 52 gene assay; liquid biopsy NGS was carried out using the Oncomine Lung Cell-Free Total Nucleic Acid assay. All cases were previously tested for a single EGFR gene with the Therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR kit.ResultsThe results were divided into four groups: (i) group 1: primary resistance to first- and/or second-generation TKIs. This group, with 21 cases, showed EGFR exon 20 insertions, dual, complex mutations and variant of unknown significance, de novo MET gene amplification besides other mutations. (ii) Group 2: primary resistance to third-generation TKIs. This group showed two cases, with one showing dual EGFR mutation (L858R and E709A) and EGFR gene amplification. (iii) Group 3: secondary resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. This group had 27 cases, which were previously reported negative for EGFR T790M by single gene testing. Significant findings were MET gene amplification in four cases, with one also showing MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Three cases showed small cell change and one showed loss of primary mutation. (iv) Group 4: secondary resistance to third-generation TKIs. The latter group was further subgrouped into group 4A: secondary resistance to osimertinib (third-generation TKI) when offered as second-line therapy after first- and second-generation TKIs on detection of T790M mutation. This group had 15 cases. EGFR T790M mutation was lost in 10 (10/15; 67%) cases and was retained in five cases. Patients with T790M loss experienced early resistance (6.9 months versus 12.6 months mean, P = 0.0024) compared with cases that retained T790M. Two cases gained MET amplification as the resistance mechanisms. Other mutations that were found when EGFR T790M was lost were in FGFR3, KRAS, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, BRAF genes. One case had EML4-ALK translocation. Two cases showed driver EGFR deletion 19, retained T790M and C797S mutation in Cis form. Group 4B: secondary resistance to osimertinib (when given as first-line therapy) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This group had three cases. The duration of osimertinib treatment ranged from 11 to 17 months. Two patients showed additional C797S mutation along with primary EGFR mutation.ConclusionThis study shows the wide spectrum of primary and secondary EGFR resistance mechanisms to first, second and third generation of TKIs and helps us to identify newer therapeutic targets that could carry forward the initial advantage offered by EGFR TKIs.     

Clinical outcomes and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation among first-line gefitinib,erlotinib and afatinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations

Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) bearing an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, the clinical outcomes among the three EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still controversial. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and secondary EGFR T790M mutation among the three EGFR TKIs. From May 2014 to January 2016, a total of 301 patients received treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, based on their clinicians’ choice. The median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 months. Although the baseline characteristics of patients were unequal, progression-free survival and OS did not differ among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis found that gefitinib (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–9.46, p = 0.027), EGFR TKI treatment duration more than 13 months (aOR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.20–8.33, p = 0.020), male (aOR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.10–9.66, p = 0.034), initial liver metastasis (aOR 4.97, 95% CI 1.18–20.96, p = 0.029) and uncommon EGFR mutation (aOR 0.14, 95% CI, 0.02–0.97, compared to EGFR deletion 19, p = 0.047) were independent factors for secondary T790M mutation. In real-world practice, choosing first line EGFR TKI based on the patients’ clinical characteristics yielded good clinical outcomes. First-line gefitinib, longer EGFR TKI treatment duration, male, initial liver metastasis and uncommon EGFR mutations may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation.     

Picoliter‐Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction‐Based Analysis of Cell‐Free Plasma DNA to Assess EGFR Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma That Confer Resistance to Tyrosine‐Kinase Inhibitors

Purpose.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of analyzing cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) by picoliter-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to detect EGFR mutations that confer resistance to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used for treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (LADC).

Experimental design.

Thirty-five LADC patients who received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKI therapy, including ten who received tumor rebiopsy after development of resistance, were subjected to picoliter-ddPCR-cfDNA analysis to determine the fraction of cfDNA with TKI-sensitive (L858R and inflame exon 19 deletions) and -resistant (i.e., T790M) mutations, as well as their concordance with mutation status in rebiopsied tumor tissues.

Results.

cfDNA samples from 15 (94%) of 16 patients who acquired resistance were positive for TKI-sensitive mutations. Also, 7 (44%) were positive for the T790M mutation, with fractions of T790M (+) cfDNA ranging from 7.4% to 97%. T790M positivity in cfDNA was consistent in eight of ten patients for whom rebiopsied tumor tissues were analyzed, whereas the remaining cases were negative in cfDNA and positive in rebiopsied tumors. Prior to EGFR-TKI therapy, cfDNAs from 9 (38%) and 0 of 24 patients were positive for TKI-sensitive and T790M mutations, respectively. Next-generation sequencing of cfDNA from one patient who exhibited innate resistance to TKI despite a high fraction of TKI-sensitive mutations and the absence of the T790M mutation in his cfDNA revealed the presence of the L747P mutation, a known driver of TKI resistance.

Conclusion.

Picoliter-ddPCR examination of cfDNA, supported by next-generation sequencing analysis, enables noninvasive assessment of EGFR mutations that confer resistance to TKIs.

Implications for Practice:

Noninvasive monitoring of the predominance of tumors harboring the secondary T790M mutation in the activating mutation in EGFR gene is necessary for precise and effective treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Because cells harboring the T790M mutation are resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the predominance of tumor cells harboring the T790M mutations influences the choice of whether to use conventional or next-generation TKIs. Digital polymerase chain reaction-based examination of cfDNA is a promising method; however, its feasibility, including its consistency with examination of rebiopsied tumor tissue, has not been fully proven. Here, picoliter-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction technology is presented as a candidate method for testing cfDNA and assessing the predominance of T790M-mutant tumors.     

Local Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease in Patients With Advanced Stage Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation

Introduction

The effect of local therapy (LT) for oligoprogressive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well established. Forty-six patients with stage IIIB/IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC were treated by LT and continuing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for oligoprogression. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after LT were 13.0 and 7.0 months, respectively. EGFR mutation type, sites of LT, and time from first progressive disease (PD) to LT were prognostic of OS after LT.

Clinical Factors Predicting Detection of T790M Mutation in Rebiopsy for EGFR-Mutant Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Background

T790M, a secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, accounts for approximately 50% of acquired resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To facilitate the use of third-generation EGFR-TKIs to potentially overcome T790M-mediated resistance, we evaluated the clinical factors influencing the incidence of T790M mutation.

Poor response to erlotinib in patients with tumors containing baseline EGFR T790M mutations found by routine clinical molecular testing

BackgroundEGFR T790M is the most common mutation associated with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Baseline EGFR T790M mutations in EGFR TKI-naïve patients have been reported, but the frequency and their association with response to EGFR TKIs remain unclear.Patients and methodsThe frequency of baseline EGFR T790M as detected by routine molecular genotyping was determined by reviewing clinical results obtained at our institution from 2009 to 2013. We also collected outcome data for treatment with EGFR TKIs.ResultsTo define the incidence of EGFR T790M, we reviewed 2774 sequentially tested patients with lung cancer who underwent molecular testing using a mass spectrometry-based assay, and 11 (0.5%) had baseline EGFR T790M. Compiling results from several molecular techniques, we observed EGFR T790M in tumors from 20 patients who had not previously been treated with an EGFR TKI. In all cases, EGFR T790M occurred concurrently with another EGFR mutation, L858R (80%, 16/20), or exon 19 deletion (20%, 4/20). Two percent of all pre-treatment EGFR-mutant lung cancers harbored an EGFR T790M mutation. Thirteen patients received erlotinib monotherapy as treatment for metastatic disease. The response rate was 8% (1/13, 95% confidence interval 0%–35%). For the patients who received erlotinib, the median progression-free survival was 2 months and the median overall survival was 16 months.ConclusionsDe novo EGFR T790M mutations are rare (<1%) when identified by standard sensitivity methods. TKI therapy for patients with baseline EGFR T790M detected by standard molecular analysis has limited benefit.     

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Activity in Patients with NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective International Cohort Study (UpSwinG)

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common mutations (Del19 or L858R); however, 7%-23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations. These mutations are highly heterogeneous, and developments in detection techniques are helping to identify mutations with little or no clinical data.Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective, global, multi-center study ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT04179890","term_id":"NCT04179890"}}NCT04179890), existing health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (T790M, ex20ins, major uncommon [G719X, L861Q, or S768I], or “other” mutations; compound mutations) treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib in first or second line. Endpoints included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS).ResultsOverall, 246 patients (median age: 69.5 years; Asian: 84%) were included from 9 countries. Most patients (92%) received an EGFR TKI as first-line therapy; 54%, 43% and 3% received afatinib, first-generation TKIs, and osimertinib, respectively. Median TTF and OS with EGFR TKIs were 9.9 and 24.4 months; ORR was 43%. In patients treated with first-line chemotherapy (n = 20), median TTF and ORR were 6.6 months and 41%. Outcomes were most favorable in patients with major uncommon or compound mutations. Overall, TTF was 11.3 months with afatinib and 8.8 months with first-generation EGFR TKIs across mutation categories. In most mutation categories, median OS was >2 years.ConclusionIn a real-world setting, EGFR TKIs were the preferred treatment option in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations; strongest outcomes were seen in patients with major uncommon and compound mutations.     

Urinary circulating DNA detection for dynamic tracking of EGFR mutations for NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs

Purpose

Changes in EGFR profiles of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients correlates to clinical outcome. Extracting quality tumor tissue remains a challenge for molecular profiling. Our study aims to ascertain the clinical relevance of urinary cell free DNA as an alternative tumor material source.

Methods

150 patients with activating EGFR mutation and received EGFR-TKIs were recruited to participate in the serial monitoring study. Matched primary tumor samples were taken together with blood and urine specimens before the initiation of TKIs. The EGFR mutation testing was performed and quantified using ddPCR. For serial time point measurements, urine and blood samples were extracted at 1-month intervals for duration of 9 months.

Results

Urinary ctDNA yielded a close agreement of 88 % on EGFR mutation status when compared to primary tissue at baseline. Almost all samples detected via urine specimens were uncovered in plasma samples. Analysis of urinary cell free DNA at different time points showed a strong correlation to treatment efficacy. Interestingly, a secondary EGFR mutation T790M was detected for 53 % of the patients during monitoring. The results were corroborated with the plasma ctDNA analysis. The T790M+ group had a reduced median survival when compared to the wildtype group.

Conclusion

Urinary cell free DNA may be a potential alternative to conventional primary tissue based EGFR mutation testing. Our findings showed that the assay sensitivity was comparable to results from blood plasma. Urinary samples being noninvasive and readily available have clinical utility for monitoring of EGFR TKI treatment.