When antiepileptic drugs aggravate epilepsy

Paradoxically, an antiepileptic drug (AED) may aggravate epilepsy. The number of AEDs is steadily increasing, and the occurrence of paradoxical aggravation will probably become a frequent problem. The overall status of the patient treated for epilepsy can be altered due to maladjustment to the diagnosis of epilepsy, to unwanted side-effects, to overdosage and to the occurrence of tolerance. However, the main mechanism of aggravation is the occurrence of an inverse pharmacodynamic effect. The specific effect of the AED is such that it controls epilepsy in most cases and increases seizures in other cases. Idiopathic generalised epilepsies (IGE) are particularly prone to pharmacodynamic aggravation: typical absences are constantly increased by carbamazepine (CBZ), vigabatrin, tiagabine, gabapentin, while phenytoin (PHT) is less aggravating. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is often aggravated by CBZ, less constantly by PHT and other AEDs. Generalised tonic-clonic seizures found in IGEs may respond to AEDs that aggravate the other seizure types. In symptomatic generalised epilepsies, patients have often several seizure types that respond differently to AEDs: myoclonias are generally aggravated by the same drugs that aggravated IGEs; tonic seizures in the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome respond to CBZ, which may however aggravate atypical absences. In severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, there is a nearly constant aggravating effect of lamotrigine. In some patients with benign rolandic epilepsy, a clear aggravation may be produced by CBZ, with occurrence of negative myoclonias, atypical absences, drop attacks, and at the maximum evolution into a state of electrical status epilepticus during sleep. It is much more difficult to pinpoint specific pharmacological sensitivity in other focal epilepsies, but aggravation clearly occurs. When treating epilepsy, the clinician should act according to seizure type, or, better, to epilepsy type. Patients are usually aware of aggravation before their doctors: we should listen carefully whenever they express a 'dislike' for an AED.     

Antiepileptic Drug Actions

Summary: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) vary in their efficacy against generalized tonic-clonic, myoclonic, and absence seizures, suggesting different mechanisms of action. Phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) reduced the ability of mouse central neurons to sustain high-frequency repetitive firing of action potentials (SRF) at therapeutic free serum concentrations. Phenobar-bital (PB) and the benzodiazepines (BZDs), diazepam (DZP), clonazepam (CZP), and lorazepam (LZP), also reduced SRF, but only at supratherapeutic free serum concentrations achieved in treatment of generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus. These AEDs interact with sodium channels to slow the rate of recovery of the channels from inactivation. The BZDs and PB enhanced γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) responses evoked on mouse central neurons by binding to two different sites on the GABA_A receptor channel. BZDs increased the frequency of GABA receptor channel openings. In contrast, barbiturates increased the open duration of these channels. VPA enhanced brain GABA concentration and may enhance release of GABA from nerve terminals. Ethosuximide (ESM) reduced a small transient calcium current which has been shown to be involved in slow rhythmic firing of certain neurons. Reduction of SRF, enhancement of GABA-ergic inhibition, and reduction of calcium current may be, in part, the bases for A ED action against generalized tonic-clonic, myoclonic, and absence seizures, respectively.     

Antiepileptic Drug-Induced Worsening of Seizures in Children

Summary: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may aggravate preexisting seizures and trigger new seizure types. However, the extent and mechanisms of this problem are unclear, for several reasons. AED trials are not designed to detect worsening of seizures, severe childhood epilepsies may fluctuate in severity, and worsening of seizures may be over-hastily ascribed to the introduction of a new AED. Moreover, the seizure and the epilepsy type may have been incorrectly diagnosed. The problem is identification of true aggravation of epilepsy in the absence of overdosage or toxicity. This is a common and clinically important problem that concerns both established and newer AEDs, but the biologic mechanisms involved are unknown. An increase in seizure frequency due to overdosage has been reported with phenytoin but is rare with other AEDs. Paradoxical reaction has been reported with carbamazepine (CBZ), benzodiazepines, and vigabatrin (VGB). Exacerbation of seizures may also occur during AED-induced encephalopathy or hepatopathy. An inappropriate choice of the AED (i.e., a purely pharmacodynamic mechanism) can induce worsening when CBZ or VGB is used in absence and myoclonic seizures. Further research should determine whether seizure exacerbation is associated with the type of epilepsy or with the type of EEG abnormality. Recent evidence indicates that lamotrigine is inappropriate in severe myoclonic epilepsy. Some childhood epileptic encephalopathies have been affected by certain seizure-worsening mechanisms. Whether this is due to a predisposition in specific syndromes or to an increased risk for adverse effects in patients undergoing multiple AED manipulations is unclear. Furthermore, some syndromes are not the sum of accompanying seizure types but have unique neurobiology.     

Chronic management of seizures in the syndromes of idiopathic generalized epilepsy

As a group, idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) have the highest rates of complete seizure control with medication. However, there are little evidence-based data to guide drug choice for treatment. Examples of IGE include absence epilepsy, generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Generalized epilepsies seem to be particularly vulnerable to seizure aggravation, and medications that are primarily effective against partial seizures are more commonly involved in seizure aggravation than other medications. A review of current research has shown that only a few medications can control IGE without potentially causing seizure aggravation. Broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs such as valproate (VPA), lamotrigine, and topiramate are extremely effective at controlling a variety of seizures without causing excessive seizure aggravation. Among these drugs, VPA has the longest clinical experience history and the largest body of published data.     

Selection of drugs for the treatment of epilepsy

Antiepileptic drug selection is based on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the drug of choice is valproate. Secondary generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single drug or combination of drugs. The drugs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide and valproate. For control of tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major antiepileptic drugs can be effective. If valproate cannot be used, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or primidone is effective, but ethosuximide or a benzodiazepine needs to be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The drugs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily tonic-clonic seizures are carbamazepine and phenytoin. Increasing evidence suggests that valproate may be a third alternative. Phenobarbital and primidone are second choice selections because of side effects. A combination of two of these five major antiepileptic drugs may be necessary for inadequately controlled patients. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, and alcoholic epilepsy require specific drug treatment. For all these seizure types and epilepsy syndromes, treatment ultimately must be selected to provide maximal efficacy and minimal adverse effect for each individual patient.     

Effect of topiramate on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in two models of experimental epilepsy

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED), topiramate (TPM), with conventional AEDs against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats and pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in mice. METHODS: Experiments were performed on mice and fully kindled rats. In pentylenetetrazol test, the chemoconvulsant was used at its CD97 dose of 105 mg/kg, producing clonic seizures in 97% of mice. Adverse effects were evaluated with the chimney test and passive avoidance task. Plasma levels of AEDs were measured with immunofluorescence. RESULTS: TPM at 20 mg/kg exerted a significant anticonvulsant effect as regards seizure and afterdischarge durations in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats, being ineffective at lower doses. Coadministration of TPM (10 mg/kg) with valproate (VPA; at a subtherapeutic dose of 50 mg/kg) resulted in essential reductions of seizure and afterdischarge durations. TPM (10 mg/kg) combined with carbamazepine (CBZ; at a subtherapeutic dose of 15 mg/kg) significantly increased afterdischarge threshold, simultaneously decreasing the remaining seizure parameters (duration or severity of seizures and afterdischarge duration). TPM (10 mg/kg) given with phenobarbital (PB; 15 mg/kg) markedly shortened seizure severity and seizure and afterdischarge durations. Combinations of TPM with diphenylhydantoin (PHT) were ineffective against kindled seizures in rats. TPM combined with VPA and PB did not alter their plasma levels, but its combination with CBZ resulted in an increased free plasma CBZ concentration. TPM (10 and 20 mg/kg) alone and its combinations with conventional AEDs affected neither motor coordination nor long-term memory, evaluated in the chimney and passive avoidance tests, respectively, in rats. In pentylenetetrazol-evoked convulsions in mice, TPM (175 and 200 mg/kg) showed anticonvulsant effects per se. Moreover, TPM (at its subtherapeutic dose of 150 mg/kg), significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant action of ethosuximide (ESM), but not that of VPA, PB, or clonazepam (CZP) against pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures. Either TPM alone (150 mg/kg) or its combination with ESM did not result in significant undesired effects. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental data indicate that except for PHT, the combinations of TPM with conventional AEDs are beneficial against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats. In the pentylenetetrazol test, this novel AED potentiated only the protection offered by ESM.     

Systematic Testing of Medical Intractability for Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, and Phenobarbital or Primidone in Monotherapy for Patients Considered for Epilepsy Surgery

Summary: Purpose: To assess medical intractability in patients considered for restrictive epilepsy surgery.
Methods: Seventy-four patients received single drug treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), and either phenobarbital (PB) or primidone (PRM). Medical intractability was established if seizure control was not obtained despite maximum tolerable doses of the drug. In all, 120 single drug treatments were administered with the drugs that has not been administered at maximal doses in monotherapy before the study.
Results: Complete seizure control was not achieved in any patient. However, 7 patients (9.5%) had significant seizure reduction of at least 80%. In 4 patients, only the third antiepileptic drug (AED) proved effective.
Conclusion: The poor result of AED monotherapy in our patients may be attributed to the patients'long-standing chronic epilepsies and high seizure frequencies. Our findings suggest that despite the failure of one or two major AEDs in controlling seizures completely, further single drug treatment may still improve the quality of life in some patients who are candidates for epilepsy surgery.     

A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the clinical impact of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The Italian TDM Study Group in Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical impact of monitoring serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: One-hundred eighty patients with partial or idiopathic generalized nonabsence epilepsy, aged 6 to 65 years, requiring initiation of treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), or primidone (PRM) were randomly allocated to two groups according to an open, prospective parallel-group design. In one group, dosage was adjusted to achieve serum AED concentration within a target range (10-20 microg/ml for PHT, 15-40 microg/ml for PB, 4-11 microg/ml for CBZ, and 40-100 microg/ml for VPA), whereas in the other group, dosage was adjusted on clinical grounds. Patients were followed up for 24 months or until a change in therapeutic strategy was clinically indicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients with partial epilepsy were treated with CBZ, whereas generalized epilepsies were most commonly managed with PB or VPA. PHT was used only in a small minority of patients. A total of 116 patients completed 2-year follow-up, and there were no differences in exit rate from any cause between the monitored group and the control group. The proportion of assessable patients with mean serum drug levels outside the target range (mostly below range) during the first 6 months of the study was 8% in the monitored group compared with 25% in the control group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the monitored group and the control group with respect to patients achieving 12-month remission (60% vs. 61%), patients remaining seizure free since initiation of treatment (38% vs. 41%), and time to first seizure or 12-month remission. Frequency of adverse effects was almost identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small minority of patients were treated with PHT, the drug for which serum concentration measurements are most likely to be useful. With the AEDs most commonly used in this study, early implementation of serum AED level monitoring did not improve overall therapeutic outcome. and the majority of patients could be satisfactorily treated by adjusting dose on clinical grounds. Monitoring the serum levels of these drugs in selected patients and in special situations is likely to be more rewarding than routine measurements in a large clinic population.     

Outpatient sleep recording during antiepileptic drug monotherapy

The effects of sleep and sleep deprivation on epilepsy are well known, but the effects of seizures and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on sleep have been less well studied. We recorded nocturnal sleep in 17 patients receiving antiepileptic monotherapy with ambulatory cassette EEG devices. Twelve patients had complex partial seizures and five had tonic-clonic convulsions. Two patients' seizures were largely nocturnal, and no seizures occurred during sleep recording. Five patients each were taking phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA), and two were taking clonazepam (CZP), all with therapeutic serum levels and no toxic symptoms. Total sleep time was reduced, wakefulness increased, and sleep latency prolonged in partial seizures as compared with generalized epilepsy. REM sleep was reduced and its latency decreased in partial seizure patients. Both groups had decreased slow wave sleep; that of partial seizure patients was decreased more markedly. PHT increased sleep latency and decreased sleep time, and CBZ increased awakening and diminished slow wave and REM sleep. Patients taking VPA had slight reduction in slow wave sleep; those taking CPZ had decreased sleep and REM latencies. Epilepsy may affect nocturnal sleep, and the effects of partial and generalized seizure disorders may be different. AEDs may also have differential effects on nighttime sleep. These may prove important in the long-term management of epileptic patients.     

Adverse effects of carbamazepine,phenytoin, valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in epileptic adult Chinese patients

Objective

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been widely used in patients with epilepsy but the adverse effects in adult Chinese patients have not been investigated. This study evaluated the adverse effects of four commonly prescribed AED monotherapies with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in adult Chinese patients with epilepsy.

Methods

The prospective open-label clinical trial was conducted at the Chongqing Epilepsy Center. The study enrolled 505 adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, including generalized tonic–clonic (n = 110), partial and partial secondarily generalized (n = 395) seizures. Patients were evaluated by two clinicians at the Center and were prescribed one type of AED monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA or LTG for a 24-month period. An adverse effect profile, as well as efficacy of monotherapy, was obtained through a face-to-face interview with the patient at each visit. A physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed during a clinical screening.

Results

A total of 62.6% (316/505) patients successfully completed the AED monotherapy study: 64.3% of those receiving CBZ, 55.9%—PHT, 61.5%—VPA, and 66.2%—LTG. However, 34.7% of the patients discontinued the AED monotherapy because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Overall, 18% of patients experienced adverse effects: for CBZ (25/168; 14.9%), PHT (18/59; 30.5%), VPA (32/192; 16.7%) and LTG (16/86; 18.6%). The most common drug-related adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, loss of appetite and nausea, weight gain and fatigue/tiredness. Tremor and nystagmus occurred in some patients receiving PHT and VPA. Two CBZ, one PHT and four LTG patients (n = 7) discontinued the study due to rash.

Conclusion

Adult Chinese patients with epilepsy accepted and tolerated monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA, and LTG. No fatal adverse events occurred. Unsatisfactory seizure control was a primary reason for withdrawal from the AED monotherapy study.     

Seizure freedom with different therapeutic regimens in intellectually disabled epileptic patients.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a frequent condition in persons with intellectual disability and is more often difficult to treat than in the average population. Seizure freedom is the primary therapeutic goal which has important implications for the patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to find out which antiepileptic therapy regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) are effective in achieving this goal in intellectually disabled epilepsy patients. We were especially interested in the impact of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) which were introduced during the past decade. METHOD: We investigated retrospectively the antiepileptic regimens on which the resident patients of a large epilepsy centre (as a rule with additional intellectual disabilities of different degrees) were seizure free in 2002. Information on antiepileptic medication and seizure frequency was taken out of the individual case documentation. It was also determined whether seizure free patients had already been seizure free in 1992. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty out of 675 patients (35,6%) with epilepsy were seizure free. The proportion of seizure freedom was 43,7% in patients with borderline intelligence, 39,2% in mild, 33,2% in moderate, 31,9% in severe, and 21,9% in profound intellectual disability. One hundred and twenty-two (50,8%) seizure free patients were on monotherapy; 53 of them were on CBZ (PB: 34, VPA: 25, PHT: 7, LTG: 3). Ninety-three patients (38,7%) were on duotherapies, CBZ/PB (27 patients), PB/PHT (17), and LTG/VPA (14) being the commonest. Of 18 (7,5%) triple therapies, LTG/PB/VPA (4 patients) was the commonest. Taken together, the five most frequent therapeutic regimens were CBZ monotherapy, PB monotherapy, CBZ/PB, VPA monotherapy and PB/PHT (a clear preponderance of classic AEDs). A distinction was made between "old seizure free" (seizure free already in 1992) and "new seizure free" (in 1992 still seizures) patients. In the 132 old seizure free patients the classic AEDs prevailed again, monotherapies with CBZ, PB and VPA being the most frequent regimens. In comparison, in the 78 new seizure free patients the novel combination LTG/VPA was the third most frequent, after the classic regimens CBZ/PB and CBZ; PB monotherapies were rare. CONCLUSION:In a majority of intellectually disabled patients with epilepsy (including those who became seizure free since 1992), complete seizure control has been achieved by monotherapy or duotherapy with classic AEDs. Of the new AEDs LTG in combination with VPA appears to be an important innovation.     

Acute Intermittent Porphyria and Epilepsy: Safety of Clonazepam

A young woman with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy began to have generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs) at age 13. Subsequently, she had myoclonic seizures, which were often precipitated by visual stimulation, tended to occur in the morning, and sometimes evolved into GTCs. Valproate (VPA) resulted in a worsening of latent AIP, and treatment with a combination of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and clonazepam (CZP) led to severe neuropathy of AIP and an electrolyte imbalance. These conditions were improved by water restriction, infusion of high doses of carbohydrates, and discontinuation of all antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) except for CZP. CZP appeared to be effective both in improving GTCs and myoclonic seizures and did not induce any symptoms of AIP. CZP may be porphyrogenic but can be used safely at a low dose for treatment of epilepsy in patients with AIP.     

Pregnancy and teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs

Maternal use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of congenital abnormalities in the fetus. This is partly attributable to AEDs. We aimed to analyse seizure frequency and the rate and type of any congenital malformation related to pregnancies in women with epilepsy in this prospective study. Eighty four pregnant women with epilepsy on AEDs were followed for congenital malformations. Z test was used for statistical analysis. Pregnancy did not influence the seizure frequency in 64 (76.2%) pregnancies. The seizure frequency increased in 16 (19.04%) pregnancies. In 4 (4.76%) pregnancies the number of seizures decreased during pregnancy. Overall percentage of congenital malformations in infants of mothers with epilepsy treated with AEDs was 10%, versus 3.65% in the general Turkish population. Percentages of malformations in children of pregnancies in women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were; 6.52% (3/46) for carbamazepine (CBZ), 14.28% (2/14) for phenytoin (PHT), 13.33% (2/15)for valproic acid (VPA) and 20% (1/5) for phenobarbital (PB). This comfirms previous reports that all four AEDs (CBZ, PHT VPA, PB) are associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations, although CBZ seems to be the the safest agent in monotherapy.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between common antiepileptic drugs and acetone, the chief anticonvulsant ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet in mice

Purpose:   Acetone is the principal ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet (KD), with demonstrated robust anticonvulsant properties across a variety of seizure tests and models of epilepsy. Because the majority of patients continue to receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during KD treatment, interactions between acetone and AEDs may have important clinical implications. Therefore, we investigated whether acetone could affect the anticonvulsant activity and pharmacokinetic properties of several AEDs against maximal electroshock (MES)–induced seizures in mice.
Methods:   Effects of acetone given in subthreshold doses were tested on the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), topiramate (TPM) and valproate (VPA) against MES-induced seizures in mice. In addition, acute adverse effects of acetone–AEDs combinations were assessed in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Pharmacokinetic interactions between acetone and AEDs were also studied in the mouse brain tissue.
Results:   Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, LTG, PB, and VPA against MES-induced seizures; effects of OXC, PHT, and TPM were not changed. Acetone (7.5 mmol/kg) did not enhance the acute adverse-effect profiles of the studied AEDs. Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect total brain concentrations of the studied AEDs. In contrast, VPA, CBZ, LTG, OXC, and TPM significantly decreased the concentration of free acetone in the brain; PB and PHT had no effect.
Conclusions:   Acetone enhances the anticonvulsant effects of several AEDs such as VPA, CBZ, LTG, and PB without affecting their pharmacokinetic and side-effect profiles.     

Oxcarbazepine in Focal Epilepsy and Hepatic Porphyria: A Case Report

PURPOSE: Despite the development of new antiepileptic agents (AEDs), the therapy of epilepsies along with hepatic porphyrias remains difficult. Most AEDs such as carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) may precipitate clinically latent porphyria by inducing hepatic metabolism and increasing hepatic heme synthesis. Actually, only gabapentin (GBP), an AED without any hepatic metabolism, is known as a potential therapy for partial seizures in patients having hepatic forms of porphyria. METHODS: We present the case of a 28-year-old man with porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) who has had pharmacoresistant epilepsy with complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures since early childhood. Despite having undergone several AED therapies over the years, no seizure-free interval had been observed. Only CBZ could cause a seizure reduction, but this treatment had to be discontinued as an elevation of the transaminases as well as pruritus and erythema were noted. The patient was then started on oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), a ketoanalogue of CBZ similar in its pharmacologic mechanism as well as its clinical use, but which, in contrast to CBZ, has only a low hepatic induction of microsomal enzymes. A final maintenance dose four times higher than that of CBZ was prescribed. RESULTS: In the follow-up, the patient stopped having seizures, and his liver functions became normal. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that OCBZ can successfully be administered to patients with hepatic porphyria and focal epilepsy who did not respond to treatment with GBP.     

Practical Management Issues for Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies

Summary:  The idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) are a group of epilepsies that are genetically determined, have no structural or anatomic cause, and usually begin early in life. Neurologic examination, intelligence, and imaging studies are normal, and EEG shows only epileptiform abnormalities (i.e., no abnormal slow activity or evidence for diffuse encephalopathy). In some IGE, the genetic substrate has been identified, whereas in most, it remains unknown. Depending on the age at onset and predominant seizure type, individual subtypes of IGE (syndromes) are defined. However, overall, there are more similarities than there are differences among the various subtypes, and the IGE are best viewed as a spectrum or continuum of conditions. In general, IGE respond to treatment, with 80–90% becoming fully controlled. However, not all antiepileptic drugs (AED) are equally effective in IGE. Some AED are ill advised because they either do not work or exacerbate seizure types other than generalized tonic–clonic (GTC) seizures, that is, absence and myoclonic seizures. These include carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, gabapentin, and tiagabine. Their use is the main cause of "pseudo-intractability," and at least in the United States where PHT and CBZ are the most commonly used AEDs, patients with IGE are often on inadequate medications. For patients with clear IGE, the drug of choice is generally valproic acid because it effectively controls absence myoclonic seizures and GTC seizures. Second-line drugs (when first-line drugs fail or are not tolerated) may include benzodiazepines, but the use of second-line drugs is evolving rapidly. Some of the newer AEDs are considered broad spectrum, meaning that they work in IGE and focal epilepsies, although the evidence is largely preliminary at this point. These newer AEDs include lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, and zonisamide.     

Clinical Side Effects of Phenobarbital, Primidone, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate During Monotherapy in Children

The rate of onset of side effects was examined in 392 pediatric outpatients who received long-term monotherapy with phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), or valproate (VPA) for epilepsy or febrile convulsions. The severity of side effects (based on need to alter treatment), the nature of each drug's most common side effects, and the doses and plasma levels of occurrence were recorded. Our results show that usually accepted therapeutic ranges are well tolerated. Indeed, although some form of side effect occurred in 50% of patients, treatment had to be changed in only 18% and the drug had to be stopped in only 7%. In decreasing order, the rates for side effects were PHT (71%) greater than PB (64%) greater than CBZ (43%) greater than VPA (43%) greater than PRM (29%). Serious side effects requiring withdrawal of treatment occurred at the following rates: PHT (10%) greater than VPA (8%) greater than PRM (8%) greater than PB (4%) greater than CBZ (3%). Among our patients, the best tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) was CBZ, and the least tolerated was PHT. Behavioral disorders were most common with PB, neurologic disorders with PHT, digestive tract disorders with VPA, and gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism with PHT. Behavioral disorders involving excitement seen with PB and PRM occurred most commonly at low plasma levels. Behavioral disorders involving depression seen with PB and VPA, those involving excitement seen with PHT and VPA, and digestive disorders seen with VPA occurred particularly when plasma levels were high.     

Prognostic Significance of Failure of the Initial Antiepileptic Drug in Children with Absence Epilepsy

PURPOSE: In children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) and juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), to determine the impact of failure of initial antiepileptic drug (AED) for lack of efficacy in eventual seizure control and long-term remission of epilepsy. METHODS: Centralized EEG records for the province of Nova Scotia allowed identification of all children seen with CAE or JAE between 1977 and 1985. Information regarding success or failure of initial AED in fully controlling seizures and long-term seizure control and remission of epilepsy was collected by patient questionnaire and chart review. RESULTS: Eighty-six of 92 eligible patients were followed up (75 CAE, 11 JAE). Initial AED treatment was successful in 52 (60%) of 86. Success tended to be greater for valproate (VPA) than for other AEDs (p = 0.07), and lower if generalized tonic-clonic or myoclonic seizures coexisted (p < 0.004 and p < 0.03). Terminal remission was more likely if the initial AED was successful than if it had failed (69% vs. 41%; p < 0.02). Compared with those in whom the initial AED was successful, subjects whose initial AED had failed were more likely to progress to juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) at last follow-up (32% vs. 10%; p < 0.02) and to develop intractable epilepsy (17% vs. 2%; p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Initial AED was successful in 60% of children with AE. If the first AED failed, the outcome was less favorable, with a lower rate of terminal remission and a higher rate of progression to JME and intractable epilepsy.     

Effects of antiepileptic drugs and seizure type on operant responding in mentally retarded persons

The performance of 129 mentally retarded persons was studied on a progressive fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Subjects were selected according to antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen or membership in one of four control groups. The AEDs studied were: phenobarbital (PB); phenytoin (PHT); PB in combination with PHT (PB/PHT); and valproic acid (VPA) in combination with other AEDs . The control groups were: persons without seizure disorders and on no medications (control); persons without seizure disorders, but on the chronic medication thioridazine ( TDZ ); persons with histories of one or more seizures and treatment with PB and/or PHT, but currently on no AEDs ; and, to control for the effects of multiple AEDs , persons on multiple drug regimens (i.e., PB and/or PHT in combination with carbamazepine and/or ethosuximide). Except for the VPA group, response rates per minute were decreased in high intelligence quotient (greater than 40) persons receiving AEDs or with a history of treated seizures. Deficits in responding were particularly marked in persons with partial seizures. Persons on VPA responded at rates comparable with those of the control and TDZ groups, unless they had partial seizures. This effect was independent of seizure frequency and was inversely related to serum level. Persons on PB most frequently exhibited frustration responses during testing, and when these occurred they were rated as being significantly more severe. Persons on PB also most frequently elected to "leave the experiment" and did so primarily for reasons thought to reflect deficits in inhibition. These results suggest that operant tasks can be sensitive to both AED effects and to underlying alterations of function that accompany seizure disorders in the mentally retarded.