Phase II trial of thalidomide for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with RCC were treated with thalidomide at a starting dose of 200 mg daily. Thalidomide was increased by 200 mg every 2 weeks until a maximum dose of 800 mg or prohibitive toxicity was reached. Fifteen patients had prior nephrectomy, 11 patients had no prior systemic therapy, and 15 had received one prior systemic regimen. RESULTS: A maximum dose of 800 mg, 600 mg, 400 mg, and 200 mg was reached in five, 10, eight, and three patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 dyspnea occurred in four and three patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 neurologic toxicity was observed in five and two patients, respectively. Of the 25 assessable patients, the best response was stable disease in 16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 82%) patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 32% (95% CI, 14% to 50%). Three patients achieved prolonged stable disease of 16, 16+, and 18+ months, including two patients who were refractory to previous cytokine therapy. Fifty-seven percent were alive at 1 year (95% CI, 37% to 76%). CONCLUSION: This trial does not support the routine use of thalidomide to induce partial response for metastatic RCC. Because disease stabilization occurs as a part of the natural history of metastatic RCC, the potential effect of thalidomide on progression-free and overall survival for patients with advanced RCC is being addressed in a randomized phase III trial. New immunomodulatory analogs of thalidomide that have shown potentially greater antitumor effects in preclinical models warrant study in metastatic RCC.     

Nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Opinion statement Patients presenting with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) face a dismal prognosis, with a median survival time of only 6 to 12 months and a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20%. RCC is notoriously chemorefractory, and immunotherapy is associated with total response rates of less than 20% and complete response rates of less than 5%. Therefore, surgery has continued to play a prominent role in the management of patients with metastatic RCC. Recent randomized prospective trials suggest a survival advantage for cytoreductive nephrectomy, and some patients with advanced RCC may also achieve palliation. Patients with limited and resectable metastases should be considered for combined nephrectomy and metastasectomy. The other main option for patients with advanced RCC is systemic immunotherapy followed by assessment for surgical consolidation, but responses in the primary tumor are uncommon and results with this pathway have not been encouraging. Tumor embolization can be a valuable palliative adjunct for some patients with metastatic RCC. Cytoreductive nephrectomy represents the most aggressive pathway for patients with metastatic RCC. Although cytoreductive nephrectomy can extend survival by approximately 50% for many patients, it can be associated with morbidity and delay in administration of systemic therapy. Therefore, patient selection, taking into account performance status and sites and burden of disease, which are well-established prognostic factors for patients with metastatic RCC, is of paramount importance in managing this challenging group of patients.     

Clinical outcome of combined immunotherapy with low-dose interleukin-2 and interferon-α for Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had undergone radical nephrectomy: a preliminary report

Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of combined immunotherapy with interferon-α (IFN-α) and low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) for Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had undergone radical nephrectomy. Methods This study included 13 patients who were diagnosed as having metastatic RCC following radical nephrectomy. These patients received a subcutaneous injection of IFN-α (6 × 10⁶ IU per day) three times per week and an intravenous injection of IL-2 (1.4 × 10⁶ IU per day) twice per week. Tumor response was evaluated every 16 weeks, and as a rule, this weekly regimen was repeated 50 times in patients with evidence of objective response or stable disease. Results One of the 13 patients dropped out because of severe toxicity; hence, 12 patients were evaluable, with a median follow-up period of 18 months after the start of this combined therapy. Six patients (50.0%) achieved objective responses, with 1 complete response (CR), while only 2 (16.7%) demonstrated progressive disease. The median duration of response in the 6 responders was 13.5 months. Toxicity associated with this combined immunotherapy was limited to WHO grade 1 or 2 in these 12 patients. All patients were alive at last follow-up, and 2 remain disease-free after 1 additional patient showed a CR following surgical resection of the remaining metastatic disease. Conclusion Our preliminary experience suggests that long-term, repeated treatment with IFN-α and low-dose IL-2 is feasible in Japanese patients with metastatic RCC who have undergone radical nephrectomy. Although it will be necessary to accumulate data from a larger number of patients with a longer follow-up period, the combined immunotherapy tested in this study may become the preferred therapy for Japanese patients with metastatic RCC.     

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Immunotherapy-Base Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series and Review of Current Literature

The role and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy-based regimens is unclear. However, the ability to achieve a complete response for metastatic renal cell carcinoma likely requires a nephrectomy at some point during treatment. Here we present a case series of three patients with metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who received front-line immunotherapy-based treatment and subsequently underwent a cytoreductive nephrectomy. All three patients had a complete response to therapy and have subsequently remained off systemic therapy for a median of 531 days (range, 476–602). We also review the limited literature in this setting and highlight ongoing clinical trials. Although the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy-based treatment is uncertain, a subset of patients will benefit from either an immediate or deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. Ongoing trials are underway to further determine how to incorporate cytoreductive nephrectomy into the treatment paradigm for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.     

Optimal treatment of poor-risk renal cell carcinoma patients with mTOR inhibitors and anti-VEGFR agents

Poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) includes a subgroup of patients with unfavorable prognosis, according to both the Motzer and Heng criteria. Overall, owing to the poor prognosis of these patients, the approach is still a challenge for the first and subsequent lines of treatment, particularly for rare histologies other than clear cell renal cell carcinoma. In this review, we investigated the present treatment option of poor-risk metastatic RCC. Areas covered are data with first and further line of therapy with mTOR inhibitors and other agents but without cytoreductive nephrectomy or rare histologies. The current data on systemic therapy in poor-risk metastatic RCC maintain temsirolimus as the preferred first-line therapy. New agents targeting immune checkpoints are being developed in clinical trials.     

The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Histology: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation represents a rare histological entity characterized by aggressive behavior, limited efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mTOR inhibitors, and poor outcome. The immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy regimen combining ipilimumab with nivolumab represents a new standard of care for this patient population due to a hitherto unprecedented response rate and overall survival. On the other hand, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, in particular, with sarcomatoid histology, remains controversial. Patient and Methods: In the present case series, we report six patients with locally advanced or synchronous metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma and intermediate or poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, five of whom were successfully subjected to cytoreductive nephrectomy. Results: All six patients received the combination regimen of ipilimumab with nivolumab. Five of these patients underwent upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by systemic treatment without any significant delay, with a durable treatment outcome. Notably, two patients with poor prognostic features achieved a long-term major partial response to therapy. We also performed a review of the literature on optimal treatment strategies for patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Conclusion: Herein, we highlight the feasibility of performing cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with intermediate/poor prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation followed by immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. To enhance the chances of immunotherapy success, cytoreductive nephrectomy should also be considered for patients presenting with a disease with adverse prognostic parameters.     

Treatment outcome for metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: Most clinical trial reports in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) do not distinguish between histologic subtypes, making it difficult to assess specific treatment efficacy. The current retrospective study sought to define clinical features and outcome data for metastatic papillary RCC. METHODS: Clinical features, treatment outcome, and survival were evaluated in 38 patients with metastatic papillary RCC who underwent clinical evaluation at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 1985 and 2005. Twenty-three of 513 individuals were identified from a clinical trial database, 14 of 1895 from a surgery database, and 1 of 357 from a pathology database. A literature review of systemic therapy in metastatic papillary RCC was performed. RESULTS: Among the 38 patients, 30 had been treated at MSKCC with various systemic therapies, including cytokines. Twelve therapies resulted in stable disease, 30 in initial progression of disease, and 1 in an unknown response. One patient had a partial response to sunitinib, a novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The median overall survival time for the entire study group was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5-12). A literature review on treatment of metastatic papillary RCC produced 4 reports, confirming a lack of efficacy for systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A resistance to systemic therapy characterizes patients with metastatic papillary RCC. Further understanding of the genetics and molecular biology and subtypes involved may provide the basis for more effective agents. Treatment with targeted therapies or other experimental agents is warranted.     

Renal cell carcinoma from a transplanted allograft: two case reports and a review of the literature

We report 2 cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in which the tumor arose from a transplanted allograft. The first case is a 52-year-old man with a failed cadaveric renal transplantation found to have metastatic RCC. The tumor was proven to be from the allograft, as fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of biopsy material showed a female karyotype, consistent with his female donor. The second patient is a 45-year-old man who had undergone cadaveric renal transplantation in 1985 for chronic glomerulonephritis and, after 22 years, presented with renal failure. Biopsy and subsequent allograft nephrectomy revealed innumerable microscopic foci of RCC. There are only a few reported cases of RCC arising in kidney allografts and even fewer with reports of metastatic disease from the allograft. Treatments in patients with disease confined to the kidney have included partial nephrectomy and total nephrectomy. A literature search did not find any reports of treatment of metastatic RCC that arose from a renal allograft.     

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Opinion statement Patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) develop metastatic spread in approximately 33% of cases. The clinical management of patients with metastatic RCC is complicated by the lack of significant efficacy from available therapies. Common sites of metastases include the lung, liver, bone, brain, and adrenal gland, with case reports detailing the capacity of RCC to appear almost anywhere in the body. More than one organ system is often involved in the metastatic process. Metastases may be found at diagnosis or at some interval after nephrectomy. Approximately 20% to 50% of patients will eventually develop metastatic disease after nephrectomy. A shorter interval between nephrectomy and the development of metastases is associated with a poorer prognosis. Patients with metastatic RCC face a dismal prognosis, with a median survival time of only 6 to 12 months and a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20%. Recent advances in biologic response modifier therapy have brought new hope to a small percentage of patients who respond to this therapy and rekindled interest in cytoreductive nephrectomy as an integral part of the management of these patients.     

Local lymph node involvement does not predict poor outcome in pediatric renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Local lymph node involvement in adults with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with poor outcome. The prognostic significance of local lymph node involvement in children with RCC has not been studied systematically. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis, TN) and an extensive review of the medical literature were undertaken to evaluate the prognostic significance of local lymph node involvement in pediatric RCC. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with the diagnosis of RCC were treated at St. Jude since the hospital's inception in 1962. Four patients presented with lymph node-positive, distant metastasis-negative (N + M0) disease, and all 4 remain disease free after resection without adjuvant therapy (follow-up duration, 2-9 years). A systematic review of the literature including 243 pediatric patients with RCC revealed stage-specific survival rates of 92.5%, 84.6%, 72.7%, and 12.7% for Stage I-IV disease, respectively. Of 58 children with N + M0 RCC for whom outcome data were available, 42 (72.4%) were alive without disease at last follow-up. Among patients whose therapy could be discerned, those who received no adjuvant therapy fared as well (15 of 16 alive) as those who received various adjuvant treatments (22 of 31 alive). CONCLUSIONS: Children with lymph node-positive RCC in the absence of distant metastatic disease had a relatively favorable long-term prognosis, with survival rate nearly triple those of adult historical controls. Until highly effective therapies for RCC are identified, these children should not be exposed to adjuvant treatment. Further investigation of the biologic differences between adult and pediatric RCC is warranted.     

Current Algorithms and Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is highly resistant to chemotherapy but responds modestly to cytokine therapy. The prognosis for longterm survival is poor. Approximately 10% of patients who present with metastatic disease or relapse after nephrectomy are alive at 5 years. Identification of prognostic or predictive factors for individual patient outcomes is necessary in order to develop tailored treatments that reduce the risk of relapse and enhance the chance of successful management. The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival has been evaluated in studies leading to the creation of a Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk model. Additionally, the cloning of the von Hippel—Lindau tumor suppressor gene, and the elucidation of its role in upregulating growth factors associated with angiogenesis, has provided insight into RCC biology and defined a series of targets for novel therapeutic agents. These targeted agents, including sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus, and bevacizumab plus interferon-α, have shown benefit in phase III trials in first- and second-line therapy. Analysis of the data from these trials and use of prognostic models have resulted in a new paradigm for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Herein, we review these targeted agents, the MSKCC risk model, and the new paradigm for treatment of metastatic RCC.     

Cancer-specific mortality in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have undergone a nephrectomy and are eligible for adjuvant pembrolizumab

BackgroundData in patients with malignant melanoma, who have been previously treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, show a reduction in pembrolizumab efficacy upon rechallenge. We examined this scenario in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) eligible for adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy. We hypothesized that a proportion of such patients will either require re-treatment with pembrolizumab upon metastatic progression prior to cancer-specific mortality (CSM) or die from other cause mortality (OCM).Materials and methodsWe identified within the SEER database 10,635 patients, between 2004 and 2017, with a diagnosis of non-metastatic intermediate-high and high risk RCC, who had undergone nephrectomy and fulfilled criteria for enrollment in KEYNOTE-564. Kaplan-Meier analyses addressed overall survival (OS), CSM and OCM.Results9,825 (92.4%) of the 10,635 patients had intermediate-high risk RCC and 9,456 (88.9%) underwent radical nephrectomy. Additionally, 760 (7.1%) harbored sarcomatoid features. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, median OS was 9.8 (9.1–11.4) years. At 10-years of follow-up, CSM rate was 36% and OCM rate was 22%.ConclusionsBased on CSM, our observations indicate that by 10-years of follow-up 36% of patients treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab will require a rechallenge, in a setting where a checkpoint inhibitor may have reduced efficacy. Moreover, at 10-years of follow-up, 22% of patients with RCC, previously treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab, will die of other causes. These percentages should be strongly considered prior to routine use of adjuvant pembrolizumab, especially given an OS benefit has not been proven.     

转移性肾癌的靶向治疗

转移性肾癌是一种对于传统化、放疗较不敏感的不可治愈性疾病。虽然免疫治疗对部分患者具一定疗效，但疗效通常并不持久，且治疗可能导致严重的毒副作用。随着近年来对肾癌生物学及分子发病机制的加深理解，针对使用多种靶向治疗药物治疗肾癌的研究取得了可喜的成果。无论针对初治或以往治疗失败的患者，靶向治疗均显示出高于传统治疗的优越性。此外，治疗的耐受性非常良好，并不影响患者的生存质量。本综述将依据最新的临床证据，着重围绕目前主要的治疗进展加以分别阐述，同时简单概括相关的治疗靶点信息，力求使读者在基础和临床两方面对转移性肾癌的靶向治疗获得较为深刻的认识。     

Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Impact on survival and benefits of immunotherapy

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to determine the impact of the presence of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy on the survival and response to immunotherapy of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with outcome assessment based on the chart review of demographic, clinical, and pathologic data from 1087 patients. Patients with RCC who did not present with metastatic disease, who did not undergo nephrectomy as part of their cancer treatment, and those in whom either the lymph node (N) or metastatic (M) status was unknown, were excluded. A total of 322 M1 patients who met these criteria and who underwent nephrectomy for unilateral RCC formed the principal study population. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patients presented with N0M1 disease and 86 patients presented with N+M1 disease. In M1 patients, the presence of positive regional lymph nodes was associated with larger sized, higher grade, locally advanced primary tumors that were more commonly associated with sarcomatoid features. N0M1 patients were more likely to achieve an objective response to systemic immunotherapy compared with N+M1 patients (P = 0.01). N+M1 patients overall had worse short-term and long-term survival compared with N0M1 patients, with a median survival of 10.5 months compared with 20.4 months, respectively. The median survival of N0M1 patients was improved to 28 months in those who received adjunctive immunotherapy (P = 0.0008), whereas the median survival of patients with N+M1 disease was the same in those treated with and those treated without adjunctive immunotherapy (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Even in the modern era of systemic immunotherapy, the presence of regional lymphadenopathy exerts a detrimental effect on the survival of patients with metastatic RCC. Lymph node status is a strong predictor of the failure to achieve either an objective immunotherapy response or an improvement in survival when immunotherapy is given as an adjunctive treatment after cytoreductive nephrectomy. However, in multivariate analysis, including both clinical and pathologic variables, lymph node status was found to have less of an impact on survival than primary tumor stage and grade and patient performance status.     

Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To create a comprehensive algorithm that can predict postoperative renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patient outcomes and response to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed with outcome assessment on the basis of chart review of 814 patients who underwent nephrectomy between 1989 and 2000. At diagnosis, M1 or N1/N2M0 metastatic disease (M) was present in 346 patients (43%), whereas 468 patients had no metastatic disease (NM) (N0M0). On the basis of UCLA Integrated Staging System category and the presence of metastases, patients were divided into low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR), and high-risk (HR) groups. Decision boxes integrating tumor-node-metastasis staging, tumor grade, and performance status were compiled for determining a patient's risk group. RESULTS: NM-LR patients had 91% disease-specific survival at 5 years, lower recurrence rate, and better disease-free survival compared with NM-IR and HR patients. Disease progressed in 50% of NM-HR patients. Disease-specific survival of NM-HR patients who received immunotherapy (IMT) for recurrent disease was similar to that of M-LR patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy and adjuvant IMT. Time from recurrence to death for NM-HR patients was inferior to that for M-LR patients. After IMT, approximately 25% of M-LR and 12% of M-IR patients had long-term progression-free survival. M-HR patients did poorly despite IMT. CONCLUSION: Stratifying RCC patients into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk subgroups provides a clinically useful system for predicting outcome and provides a unique tool for risk assignment and outcome analysis. Subclassifying RCC into well-defined risk groups should allow better patient counseling and identification of both NM-HR subgroups that need adjuvant treatment and nonresponders who need alternative therapies.     

Surgical outcome following radical nephrectomy in cases with inferior vena cava tumour thrombus extension.

AIM: To report our experience with extensive surgery in patients with and without metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gross venous tumour thrombus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and tumour thrombus into the vena cava underwent radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy. Eight patients presented with metastatic disease at the time of surgery. Mean follow-up was 17 months (1-54 months, median 9 months). Follow-up was available for 26 patients (96%). RESULTS: Thirteen patients were alive at the time of the study; 11 without evidence of disease with a mean follow-up of 25 months and two (one with and one without metastasis at surgery) with distant metastasis at 16 and 36 months. Eleven patients have died of progressive disease. Mean survival in patients (19 patients) without metastatic disease at time of surgery was 15.2 months; patients (seven patients) with metastatic disease at surgery had a mean survival of 6.7 months. CONCLUSION: Radical nephrectomy and vena caval tumour thrombectomy can be performed in selected patients with an acceptable complication rate. Patients without metastatic disease have a better prognosis than patients with metastatic disease.     

Management and Health Resource Use of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma treated With Systemic Therapy Over 2014-2017 in France: A National Real-World Study

BackgroundThe introduction of novel systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) over the last decade has significantly improved patient outcomes. Little information is available on treatment modalities and outcomes in everyday practice. The objective of this study was to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use in mRCC patients receiving systemic therapy in France (2014-2017), using the nationwide claims database.Patients and MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of RCC (ICD-10: C64) between 2009 and 2017 and receiving a first systemic treatment for mRCC between 2014 and 2017 were eligible. Patients were divided into two groups at diagnosis, Group A: metastatic RCC and Group B: localized RCC.Results4,929 eligible patients were identified (Group A: 2638 patients, 53.5%; Group B: 2,291 patients,46.5%). Median age was 66 years and 73% were men. In patients with incident RCC (N = 3,425), 62.3% underwent nephrectomy (94.4% in Group B). Within the year following mRCC diagnosis, 86.5% were hospitalized at least once; among them 58.1% for RCC. Nearly 31% of patients underwent radiotherapy. First line treatment was sunitinib for 65% of patients and pazopanib for 24%. Twenty five percent and 10% of patients received 2 and 3 lines of systemic treatment, respectively. The 2-year survival rate after mRCC diagnosis was 44%, with median overall survival of 20 [95%CI: 19-21] months (14 and 28 in Group A and B).ConclusionThis study documented patient characteristics, treatment patterns and survival outcomes in mRCC patients receiving systemic therapy in France (2014-2017). Estimated survival rates were consistent with real-world studies from other countries.     

Advanced renal cell carcinoma

Opinion statement Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a disease that is highly resistant to systemic therapy and is difficult to treat. Nephrectomy should be seriously considered in patients who present with metastatic disease prior to systemic therapy, and surgery remains a reasonable option in patients who present with resectable metastases. Numerous studies with many different treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy, have failed to consistently benefit patients, with no single agent or combination therapy showing a reproducible response proportion of 20% or higher. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alfa (IFN alfa)-based therapies remain the most commonly used agents to treat patients with advanced disease, demonstrating low but reproducible response proportions in the 10% to 20% range, with durable responses of 5% or less. Recent randomized studies demonstrate a survival advantage for patients receiving systemic IFN-based therapy, but this advantage is marginal. Novel treatment strategies are being investigated, with some encouraging early results using vaccines and allogeneic bone marrow transplant. The identification of new agents with more effective antitumor activity is a high priority in the treatment of advanced RCC.     

Adjuvant Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Past,Present, and Future

At the present time, the standard of care for patients who have received nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is radiographic surveillance. With a number of novel targeted agents showing activity in the setting of metastatic RCC, there has been great interest in exploring the potential of the same agents in the adjuvant setting. Herein, we discuss the evolution of adjuvant trials in RCC, spanning from the immunotherapy era to the targeted therapy era. Pitfalls of current studies are addressed to provide a context for interpreting forthcoming results. Finally, we outline avenues to incorporate promising investigational agents, such as PD‐1 (programmed death‐1) inhibitors and MNNG transforming gene inhibitors, in future adjuvant trials.     

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Anti-Angiogenic Therapies in Kidney Cancer

Opinion statements Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease as reflected in its presentation and clinical course, pathological subtypes, nuclear grades and molecular biology. Emerging data indicate that renal tumors express a variety of molecular tumor markers and unique patterns of gene expression. Clinically the disease behaves quite heterogeneously, with courses ranging from indolent to highly aggressive. Surgical monotherapy or as part of a multimodal approach remains the standard of care for most cases of RCC. Radical or partial nephrectomy is associated with a 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) of 85–97% for pT1 tumors. Unfortunately, 20% of patients have either locally advanced or node positive (N+) RCC while another 22% have metastatic RCC (mRCC) at presentation. Unlike the outcomes in early localized disease, survival rates for N+ patients are poor and patients with mRCC are rarely cured despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Classic cytotoxic chemotherapy has repeatedly been shown to have little effect and only 5–20% of patients with mRCC respond to immunologic agents such as interferon and/or interleukin. Cytoreductive nephrectomy with systemic immunotherapy is associated with few cures with median survivals of 12–24 months. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular origins and pathways of RCC have led to the development of more effective targeted therapies. Here we review the molecular pathways that define the pertinent therapeutic targets in RCC and the clinical data for these new and promising agents.