Influence of jet impingement on color Doppler parameters of aortic regurgitation

In vitro studies have demonstrated that the characteristics of a color Doppler jet are influenced by a number of factors including jet eccentricity and jet impingement. To explore the relationship of a jet impingement and aortic regurgitant color Doppler jet parameters, jet area, width, and length were measured from apical echocardiographic views of 84 patients 4 +/- 11 days prior to catheterization and compared to angiographic grade. An impinging color jet contacted the interventricular septum or mitral valve beneath the aortic valve in the imaging plane and a nonimpinging jet did not contact the septum or mitral valve in the imaging plane. As expected, the percentage of patients with impinging jets increased with aortic regurgitation angiographic grade. Neither left ventricular chamber dimensions nor the presence of an aortic prosthesis significantly influenced the color Doppler variables. For a given angiographic grade of aortic regurgitation, impinging jets were associated with larger color Doppler jet widths (P less than 0.05) and areas (P = 0.001) than nonimpinging jets. The color Doppler area and length increased significantly with angiographic grade for nonimpinging jets (P less than 0.05) but not for impinging jets. Impinging jets are associated with larger color Doppler widths and areas than nonimpinging jets for a given grade of aortic regurgitation, possibly because of the effect of jet deflection toward an adjacent wall. Jet impinging should be considered when using color Doppler techniques to evaluate aortic regurgitation.     

Doppler color flow mapping of simulated in vitro regurgitant jets: evaluation of the effects of orifice size and hemodynamic variables

The spatial distribution of simulated regurgitant jets imaged by Doppler color flow mapping was evaluated under constant flow and pulsatile flow conditions. Jets were simulated through latex tubings of 3.2, 4.8, 6.35 and 7.9 mm by varying flow rates from 137 to 1,260 cc/min. Color jet area was linearly related to flow rate at each orifice (r = 0.96, SEE = 3.4; r = 0.99, SEE = 1.6; r = 0.97, SEE = 2.3; r = 0.97, SEE = 3.2, respectively), but significantly higher flow rates were required to maintain the same maximal spatial distribution of the jet at the larger regurgitant orifices. Constant flow jets were also simulated through needle orifices of 0.2, 0.5 and 1 mm, with a known total volume (5 cc) injected at varying flow rates and with differing absolute volumes injected at the same flow rate (0.2, 1.0 and 2.0 cc/s, respectively). Again, maximal color jet area was linearly related to flow rate at each orifice (r = 0.97, SEE = 2.3; r = 0.97, SEE = 2.4; r = 0.92, SEE = 3.9, respectively), but was not related to the absolute volume of regurgitation. Color encoding of regurgitant jets on Doppler color flow maps was demonstrated to be highly dependent on velocity and, hence, driving pressure, such that color encoding was obtained from a constant flow jet injected at a velocity of 4 m/s through an orifice of 0.04 mm diameter with flow rates as low as 0.008 cc/s. Mitral regurgitant jets were also simulated in a physiologic in vitro pulsatile flow model through three prosthetic valves with known regurgitant orifice sizes (0.2, 0.6 and 2.0 mm2). For each regurgitant orifice size, color jet area at each was linearly related to a regurgitant pressure drop (r = 0.98, SEE = 0.15; r = 0.97, SEE = 0.20; r = 0.97, SEE = 0.23, respectively), regurgitant stroke volume (r = 0.77, SEE = 0.55; r = 0.94, SEE = 0.30; r = 0.91, SEE = 0.41, respectively) and peak regurgitant flow rate (r = 0.98, SEE = 0.16; r = 0.97, SEE = 0.21; r = 0.93, SEE = 0.37, respectively), but the spatial distribution of the regurgitant jets was most highly dependent on the regurgitant pressure drop. Jet kinetic energy calculated from the summation of the individual pixel intensities integrated over the jet area was closely related to driving pressure (r = 0.84), but integration of the power mode area times pixel intensities provided the best estimation of regurgitant stroke volume (r = 0.80).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Aortic valve morphology: an important in vitro determinant of proximal regurgitant jet width by Doppler color flow mapping

In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that proximal aortic regurgitant jet width on Doppler color flow mapping predicts severity of aortic regurgitation. The influence of aortic valve morphology on proximal regurgitant jet width has not been studied. Despite equal cross-sectional area, differences in aortic valve morphology may influence regurgitant jet width and thus estimates of severity of aortic regurgitation. Aortic valve simulations representing degenerative, rheumatic and bicuspid valves as well as a circle in two cross-sectional areas (0.2 cm2 and 0.7 cm2) were placed in a flow model using two gradients (50 and 100 mm Hg) to produce simulated aortic regurgitant jets. Flow maps were obtained from parasternal and apical positions with color gain, frames per second, low velocity reject and depth held constant. The mean of three regurgitant jet widths for each shape, size and gradient were compared by three factor analysis of variance. Aortic valve morphology significantly affected regurgitant jet width in both parasternal and apical views (p = 0.0001 by analysis of variance) with bicuspid shapes producing regurgitant jet widths significantly different from all other shapes. Valve area also consistently significantly influenced proximal regurgitant jet width (p = 0.0001) in both views. Initial pressure gradient was less important. It is concluded that in an in vitro flow model aortic valve morphology introduces significant variability in the measurement of proximal regurgitant jet widths independent of orifice cross-sectional area. Estimates of severity of aortic regurgitation may therefore be influenced considerably by aortic valve morphology.     

Effective aortic regurgitant orifice area: description of a method based on the conservation of mass

The natural history of aortic regurgitation is incompletely understood in part because of the lack of a simple method to estimate the defect size. A method of determining the effective regurgitant orifice area that combines Doppler catheter and Doppler echocardiographic techniques and is based on the principle of conservation of mass (the continuity equation) is described. To validate the application of the Doppler catheter system for measuring regurgitant supravalvular diastolic flow, an in vitro model of retrograde aortic flow was used. These studies indicated that measurements of supravalvular retrograde velocity with the Doppler catheter accurately reflect retrograde diastolic velocity when the aorta is less than 4.8 cm in diameter. Twenty-three patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were studied; 20 of these patients had aortic regurgitation. Retrograde supravalvular diastolic velocity was determined from a Doppler catheter positioned above the aortic valve. The effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated with use of the Doppler catheter-derived regurgitant volume and mean transvalvular diastolic velocity as determined by either catheterization or continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. The catheterization-derived regurgitant orifice area increased with the angiographic grade of as follows: 1+ (0.04 to 0.10 cm2), 2+ (0.15 to 0.49 cm2), 3+ (0.29 to 1.11 cm2) and 4+ (1.24 to 1.33 cm2). By combining Doppler catheter, echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization techniques, the effective aortic regurgitant orifice area may be estimated; this hydrodynamic area correlates with grading by supravalvular aortography. Calculation of this area provides a quantitative alternative to aortography for estimating the severity of aortic regurgitation but should be used with caution in patients with a markedly dilated aorta.     

Regurgitant jet size by transesophageal compared with transthoracic Doppler color flow imaging

Combined echocardiography and Doppler color flow mapping from transthoracic imaging windows has become the standard method for the noninvasive assessment of valvular regurgitation. This study compared regurgitant jet areas by Doppler color flow imaging derived from the newer transesophageal approach with measurements obtained from conventional transthoracic apical views. Maximal regurgitant jet area determinations and an overall visual estimate of lesion severity were obtained from 42 patients who underwent color flow examination by both techniques. Seventy-three regurgitant lesions were visualized by transesophageal flow imaging: 34 mitral, 22 aortic, and 17 tricuspid jets. Transthoracic studies in the same patients revealed fewer regurgitant lesions for each valve; 20 mitral, 16 aortic, and 12 tricuspid (p = 0.0009). A comparison of maximal jet areas determined by transesophageal and transthoracic studies showed a good overall correlation (r = 0.85, SEE = 2.8 cm2) and a systematic overestimation by the transesophageal technique (TEE = 0.96 TTX + 2.7). For the subgroup with mitral insufficiency, valve lesions visualized by both techniques were larger by the transesophageal approach (n = 18, 6.0 versus 3.6 cm2, p = 0.008). Semiquantitative visual grading of individual valve lesions by two independent observers revealed a higher grade of regurgitation with more jets classified as mild (38 versus 25), moderate (18 versus 13), and severe (17 versus 10) by esophageal imaging than by transthoracic imaging. Thus, transesophageal color flow mapping techniques yield a higher prevalence of valvular regurgitation than do transthoracic techniques in the same patients. Jet area and the overall estimate of regurgitant lesion severity were also greater by transesophageal color Doppler imaging compared with standard transthoracic imaging.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Adjacent solid boundaries alter the size of regurgitant jets on Doppler color flow maps

Recent studies have attempted to predict the severity of regurgitant lesions from jet size on Doppler flow maps. Jet size is a function of both regurgitant volume and fluid entrained from the receiving chamber and, for a free jet, is a function of its momentum at the orifice. However, regurgitant jets often approach or attach to cardiac walls, potentially altering their momentum and ability to expand by entrainment. Therefore, this study addressed the hypothesis that adjacent walls influence regurgitant jet size as seen on Doppler flow maps. Steady flow was driven through circular orifices (0.02 to 0.05 cm2) at physiologic velocities of 2 to 5 m/s. At a constant flow rate and orifice velocity, orifice position was varied to produce three jet geometries: free jets, jets adjacent to a horizontal chamber wall lying 1 cm below the orifice and wall jets with the orifice at the level of the wall. Doppler color flow imaging was performed at identical instrument settings for all jets. Two long-axis views of the jet were obtained: a vertical view perpendicular to the wall, resembling that most commonly used in patients to image the length of the jet, and a horizontal view parallel to the chamber wall. Velocities along the jet were also measured by Doppler mapping.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Color Doppler diagnosis of mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation: usefulness of the flow convergence region proximal to the regurgitant orifice

In prosthetic or paravalvular prosthetic mitral regurgitation, transthoracic color Doppler flow mapping can sometimes fail to detect the regurgitant jet within the left atrium because of the shadowing by the prosthetic valve. To overcome this limitation, we assessed the utility of color Doppler visualization of the flow convergence region (FCR) proximal to the regurgitant orifice in 20 consecutive patients with mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation documented by surgery and cardiac catheterization (13 of 20 patients). In addition, we studied 33 patients with normally functioning mitral prostheses. Doppler studies were performed in the apical, subcostal, and parasternal long-axis views. An FCR was detected in 95% (19 of 20) of patients with prosthetic mitral regurgitation. A jet area in the left atrium was detected in 60% (12 of 20) of patients. In 18 of 19 patients with Doppler-detected FCR, the site of the leak was correctly identified by observing the location of the FCR. A trivial jet area was detected in eight patients with a normally functioning mitral prosthesis; in none was an FCR identified. Thus color Doppler visualization of the FCR proximal to the regurgitant orifice is superior to the jet area in the diagnosis of mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Moreover, FCR permits localization of the site of the leak with good accuracy.     

Impact of impinging wall jet on color Doppler quantification of mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND. In clinical color Doppler examinations, mitral regurgitant jets are often observed to impinge on the left atrial wall immediately beyond the mitral valve. In accordance with fluid dynamics theory, we hypothesized that a jet impinging on a wall would lose momentum more rapidly, undergo spatial distortion, and thus have a different observed jet area from that of a free jet with an identical flow rate. METHODS AND RESULTS. To test this hypothesis in vivo, we studied 44 patients with mitral regurgitation--30 with centrally directed free jets and 14 with eccentrically directed impinging wall jets. Maximal color jet areas (cm2) (with and without correction for left atrial size) were correlated with mitral regurgitant volumes, flow rates, and fractions derived from pulsed Doppler mitral and aortic forward flows. The groups were compared by analysis of covariance. Mean +/- SD mitral regurgitant fraction, regurgitant volume, and mean flow rate averaged 37 +/- 17%, 3.06 +/- 2.65 l/min, and 147 +/- 118 ml/sec, respectively. The maximal jet area from color Doppler imaging correlated relatively well with the mitral regurgitant fraction in the patients with free mitral regurgitant jets (r = 0.74, p less than 0.0001) but poorly in the patients with impinging wall jets (r = 0.42, p = NS). Although the mitral regurgitant fraction was larger (p less than 0.05) in patients with wall jets (44 +/- 20%) than in those with free jets (33 +/- 15%), the maximal jet area was significantly smaller (4.78 +/- 2.87 cm2 for wall jets versus 9.17 +/- 6.45 cm2 for free jets, p less than 0.01). For the same regurgitant fraction, wall jets were only approximately 40% of the size of a corresponding free jet, a difference confirmed by analysis of covariance (p less than 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. Patients with mitral regurgitation frequently have jets that impinge on the left atrial wall close to the mitral valve. Such impinging wall jets are less predictable and usually have much smaller color Doppler areas in conventional echocardiographic views than do free jets of similar regurgitant severity. Jet morphology should be considered in the semiquantitative interpretation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping. Future studies of the three-dimensional morphology of wall jets may aid in their assessment.     

Color Doppler regurgitant characteristics of normal mechanical mitral valve prostheses in vitro.

BACKGROUND. To evaluate normal regurgitant characteristics of St. Jude (SJ) and Medtronic-Hall (MH) mitral valves, four sizes (25-31 mm) of each were studied in a pulsatile flow model. METHODS AND RESULTS. Regurgitant flow was measured by flowmeter at left ventricular pressures of 80, 130, and 180 mm Hg. Peak regurgitant flow rates ranged from 6.2 to 12.7 cm3/sec in SJ valves and from 7.9 to 17.5 cm3/sec in MH valves. Regurgitant orifice areas calculated from the Doppler continuity equation ranged from 1.6 to 2.0 mm2 in SJ valves and from 2.2 to 2.9 mm2 in MH valves. Regurgitant volumes across the closed valve at a left ventricular pressure of 130 mm Hg were normalized to an ejection time of 280 msec and ranged from 1.5 to 1.9 cm3 in SJ valves and from 2.1 to 2.8 cm3 in MH valves. Jets were imaged by color Doppler in six rotational planes, and jet size and morphology were compared with those of regurgitant jets from circular orifices with sizes comparable to the calculated prosthetic valve regurgitant orifices (1.1-3.1 mm2). SJ valves showed two converging jets from the pivot points, one central jet, and a variable number of peripheral jets. The mean color jet area derived from the six image planes ranged from 1.6 to 5.3 cm2. Aliasing occurred only close to the valve (maximal distance 0.5-2.0 cm). MH valves showed a large central jet with a maximal length of aliased flow between 2.0 and 5.5 cm. Depending on valve size, driving pressure, and image plane, one or two small peripheral jets were found. These jets did not show aliasing in any case. The mean color jet area ranged from 5.1 to 11.0 cm2. Jets originating from circular orifices of comparable size showed jet areas from 5.5 to 13.9 cm2 and aliasing distances from 3.3 to 7.3 cm. At similar regurgitant orifice areas, driving pressures, and regurgitant flows, the measured color areas and aliasing distances were smallest in SJ valves, larger in MH valves, and largest in simple circular orifices. CONCLUSIONS. Large, complex regurgitant jets can be found in normal closed SJ and MH valves by color Doppler, although regurgitant flow volume is minimal. Jet size and velocity distribution differs markedly between SJ valves, MH valves, and circular orifices, even with comparable driving pressure, regurgitant orifice area, and regurgitant volume. The characteristic patterns of normal regurgitation must be recognized to avoid incorrect diagnoses of pathological regurgitation in SJ and MH prosthetic valves. MH valves should not be removed solely on the basis of a central regurgitant jet with a long aliasing distance. Peripheral jets in MH valves and all jets in SJ valves should be considered normal as long as no or only minimal aliasing is present. In contrast, peripheral jets with significant aliasing may represent strong evidence of pathological regurgitation.     

Quantification of jet flow by momentum analysis. An in vitro color Doppler flow study

Previous investigations have shown that the size of a regurgitant jet as assessed by color Doppler flow mapping is independently affected by the flow rate and velocity (or driving pressure) of the jet. Fluid dynamics theory predicts that jet momentum (given by the orifice flow rate multiplied by velocity) should best predict the appearance of the jet in the receiving chamber and also that this momentum should remain constant throughout the jet. To test this hypothesis, we measured jet area versus driving pressure, flow rate, velocity, orifice area, and momentum and showed that momentum is the optimal jet parameter: jet area = 1.25 (momentum).28, r = 0.989, p less than 0.0001. However, the very curvilinear nature of this function indicated that chamber constraint strongly affected jet area, which limited the ability to predict jet momentum from observed jet area. To circumvent this limitation, we analyzed the velocities per se within the Doppler flow map. For jets formed by 1-81-mm Hg driving pressure through 0.005-0.5-cm2 orifices, the velocity distribution confirmed the fluid dynamic prediction: Gaussian (bell-shaped) profiles across the jet at each level with the centerline velocity decaying inversely with distance from the orifice. Furthermore, momentum was calculated directly from the flow maps, which was relatively constant within the jet and in good agreement with the known jet momentum at the orifice (r = 0.99). Finally, the measured momentum was divided by orifice velocity to yield an accurate estimate of the orifice flow rate (r = 0.99). Momentum was also divided by the square of velocity to yield effective orifice area (r = 0.84). We conclude that momentum is the single jet parameter that best predicts the color area displayed by Doppler flow mapping. Momentum can be measured directly from the velocities within the flow map, and when combined with orifice velocity, momentum provides an accurate estimate of flow rate and orifice area.     

Sources of variability for Doppler color flow mapping of regurgitant jets in an animal model of mitral regurgitation

To determine whether Doppler color flow mapping could be used to quantify changing levels of regurgitant flow and define the technical variables that influence the size of color flow images of regurgitant jets, nine stable hemodynamic states of mitral insufficiency were studied in four open chest sheep with regurgitant orifices of known size. The magnitude of mitral regurgitation was altered by phenylephrine infusion. Several technical variables, including the type of color flow instrument (Irex Aloka 880 versus Toshiba SSH65A), transducer frequency, pulse repetition frequency and gain level, were studied. Significant increases in the color flow area, but not in color jet width measurements, were seen after phenylephrine infusion for each regurgitant orifice. For matched levels of mitral regurgitation, an increase in gain resulted in a 125% increase in color flow area. An increase in the pulse repetition and transducer frequencies resulted in a 36% reduction and a 28% increase in color flow area, respectively. Jet area for matched regurgitant volumes was larger on the Toshiba compared with the Aloka instrument (5.2 +/- 3.1 versus 3.2 +/- 1.2 cm2, p less than 0.05). Color flow imaging of mitral regurgitant jets is dependent on various technical factors and the magnitude of regurgitation. Once these are standardized for a given patient, the measurement of color flow jet area may provide a means of making serial estimates of the severity of mitral insufficiency.     

Three-dimensional reconstruction of color doppler flow convergence regions and regurgitant jets: An in vitro quantitative study

Objectives. This study sought to investigate the applicability of a current implementation of a three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction method for color Doppler flow convergence and regurgitant jet imaging.Background. Evaluation of regurgitant flow events, such as flow convergences or regurgitant jets, using two-dimensional imaging ultrasound color flow Doppler systems may not be robust enough to characterize these spatially complex events.Methods. We studied two in vitro models using steady flow to optimize results. In the first constant-flow model, two different orifices were each mounted to produce flow convergences and free jets—a circular orifice and a rectangular orifice with orifice area of 0.24 cm². In another flow model, steady flows through a circular orifice were directed toward a curved surrounding wall to produce wall adherent jets. Video composite data of color Doppler flow images from both free jet and wall jet models were reconstructed and analyzed after computer-controlled 180° rotational acquisition using a TomTec computer.Results. For the free jet model there was an excellent relation between actual flow rates and three-dimensional regurgitant jet volumes for both circular and rectangular orifices (r = 0.99 and r = 0.98, respectively). However, the rectangular orifice produced larger jet volumes than the circular orifice, even at the same flow rates (p < 0.0001). Calculated flow rates by the hemispheric model using one axial measurement of the flow convergence isovelocity surface from two-dimensional color flow images under-estimated actual flow rate by 35% for the circular orifice and by 44% for the rectangular orifice, whereas a hemielliptic method implemented using three axial measurements of the flow convergence zone derived using three-dimensional reconstruction correlated well with and underestimated actual flow rate to a lesser degree (22% for the circular orifice, 32% for the rectangular orifice). In the wall jet model, the jets were flattened against and spread along the wall and had reduced regurgitant jet volumes compared with free jets (p < 0.01).Conclusions. Three-dimensional reconstruction of flow imaged by color Doppler may add quantitative spatial information to aid computation methods that have been used for evaluating valvular regurgitation, especially where they relate to complex geometric flow events.     

Chronology of maximal surface area and peak velocities of left heart valve flow jets using Doppler imaging. Clinical implications

The aim of this study was to correlate the timing of the maximal surface area of the jet recorded by color flow Doppler and the peak velocities recorded by continuous mode Doppler with reference to the ECG R wave to determine whether standardisation of the chronologies of measurements was possible. A comparative paired study of these two parameters was undertaken in 44 subjects who had 55 left heart valvular lesions, all in sinus rhythm and, in cases of regurgitation, with pansystolic or pandiastolic regurgitant flow. The jets were examined in the inflow chambers of valvular insufficiency and at the origin of the jet in the short axis for stenotic lesions and aortic regurgitation, with planimetry of the cross sectional area in color Doppler. The correlation coefficient was 0.85 for aortic stenosis, 0.96 for mitral stenosis, 0.84 for aortic regurgitation but only 0.10 for mitral regurgitation. The mean values of the two chronologies were identical for stenotic lesions and did not differ significantly in regurgitation even at the mitral valve. However, the individual differences between the two chronologies exceeded 20 ms in 63% of aortic and 91% of mitral regurgitations. The maximal surface areas of the jets of 45% of aortic regurgitant and 91% of mitral regurgitant lesions were recorded between the onset of regurgitation and the peak jet velocity. The differences in chronology of the two parameters studied in cases of valvular regurgitation indicate the multifactorial nature of color flow jet imaging, probably associated with individual physiopathological variations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effective regurgitant orifice area: A noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, relation to other methods and significance of the effective regurgitant orifice area measurement.Background. Assessment of the severity of valvular regurgitation (effective regurgitant orifice area) has not been implemented in clinical practice but can be made by Doppler echocardiography.Methods. Effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated by Doppler echocardiography as the ratio of regurgitant volume/ regurgitant jet time-velocity integral and compared with color flow Doppler mapping, angiography, surgical classification, regurgitant fraction and variables of volume overload.Results. In 210 consecutive patients examined prospectively, feasibility improved from the early to the late experience (65% to 95%). Effective regurgitant orifice area was 28 ± 23 mm²(mean ± SD) for aortic regurgitation (32 patients), 22 ± 13 mm²for ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation (50 patients) and 41 ± 32 mm²for organic mitral regurgitation (82 patients). Significant correlations were found between effective regurgitant orifice and mitral jet area by color flow Doppler mapping (r = 0.68 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively) and angiographic grade (r = 0.77, p = 0.0004). Effective regurgitant orifice area in surgically determined moderate and severe lesions was markedly different in mitral regurgitation (35 ± 12 and 75 ± 33 mm², respectively, p = 0.009) and in aortic regurgitation (21 ± 8 and 38 ± 5 mm², respectively, p = 0.08). Strong correlations were found between effective regurgitant orifice area and variables reflecting volume overload. A logarithmic regression was found between effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant fraction, underlining the complementarity of these indexes.Conclusions. Calculation of effective regurgitant orifice area is a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept, allowing assessment of the lesion severity of valvular regurgitation. Feasibility is excellent with experience. Effective regurgitant orifice area is an important and clinically significant index of regurgitation severity. It brings additive information to other quantitative indexes and its measurement should be implemented in the comprehensive assessment of valvular regurgitation.     

Quantitation of Doppler color flow jet areas for mitral regurgitation in children: angiographic correlation.

Eighteen patients with chronic isolated rheumatic mitral regurgitation aged between 7 and 19 years (mean age +/-SD, 12.69+/-3.47 years) were analyzed with color Doppler imaging. Sixteen patients were performed cardiac catheterization within 24 h. Jets were classified as eccentric and central. Regurgitant jet area and its ratio to left atrial area and body surface area were measured by Doppler color flow imaging. Regurgitant volume and regurgitant fractions were calculated with angiography. There was a good correlation between regurgitant jet area and angiographic grade of mitral regurgitation (P<0.01). The correlation between regurgitant jet area/left atrial area ratios and angiographic grade of mitral regurgitation was limited (P<0.01). There was excellent correlation between regurgitant jet area/body surface area and angiographic regurgitant fraction (r = 0.85; P<0.001). There was also a good correlation between regurgitant jet area and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.82; P<0.001). However, the relation of regurgitant jet area/left atrial area to regurgitant fraction was weak (r = 0.72; P<0.01). In conclusion, the measurement of regurgitant fraction and its ratios to left atrial area and body surface area by color Doppler flow imaging can predict the angiographic severity in children who have even eccentric regurgitant jets.     

Vena contracta width measurement: Theoretic basis and usefulness in the assessment of valvular regurgitation severity

In patients with valvular regurgitation, the regurgitation jet can be observed by Doppler color flow imaging. Vena contracta is defined as the narrowest part of the jet, just distal to the regurgitant orifice. Vena contracta dimensions reflect the severity of regurgitation. Vena contracta diameter, usually easy to measure in clinical practice, is well correlated with the effective regurgitant orifice area and the regurgitant volume. Cutoff values have been determined to identify severe regurgitation for mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valves. In clinical practice, determination of vena contracta diameter is a useful and simple method for assessment of valvular regurgitation. In the future, assessment of complex jet regurgitations will probably benefit from the contribution of three-dimensional Doppler flow imaging, which should improve the performances of the method.     

Variability in the quantitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping: comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal studies.

OBJECTIVES. This study was designed to assess the most accurate and reproducible methods to quantitate mitral regurgitation by color flow transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. BACKGROUND. Quantitative measurements of mitral regurgitant jets have resulted in an intraobserver and interobserver variability of up to 20%. Few data are available evaluating the various techniques by which mitral regurgitant jets are quantitated. METHODS. Forty patients who underwent cardiac catheterization and both transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography within 1 week were studied. Two boundaries of the color regurgitant jet area were identified and quantitated: 1) the central aliased core of the regurgitant jet with the mosaic pattern excluding any swirling low velocity flow; and 2) the largest definable area of the regurgitant flow, including low velocity flow considered to be part of the regurgitant jet. RESULTS. The total regurgitant areas obtained by transthoracic and transesophageal studies did not differ (5.7 +/- 4.6 vs. 5.7 +/- 3.7 cm2; p = NS). However, the transesophageal mosaics were significantly larger than those obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.8 +/- 3.4 cm2; p less than 0.01). In transthoracic studies observer variability was higher when the mosaic aspect of the regurgitant jet rather than the total regurgitant area was measured (24 +/- 20 vs. 16 +/- 11%; p less than 0.05). In contrast, in transesophageal studies variability was lower when the mosaic area rather than the total regurgitant area was measured (11 +/- 12% vs. 18 +/- 18%; p less than 0.05). The best correlations with left ventriculography were obtained by using the absolute total regurgitant area (r = 0.72) for transthoracic studies and the mosaic area of the jets (r = 0.87) for transesophageal studies. CONCLUSIONS. Doppler color flow jet areas correlate closely with angiographic results in the evaluation of mitral regurgitation. The total regurgitant area (including the surrounding swirling flow) in transthoracic studies and the aliased core of the regurgitant jet (mosaic) in transesophageal studies appear to be the most accurate and reproducible measurements for evaluating mitral regurgitation.     

Value and limitations of color Doppler flow mapping in the detection and semiquantification of valvular regurgitation

Summary We compared color Doppler flow mapping data to angiographic data in 294 patients with suspected valvular regurgitation. Thirty-one patients had rheumatic mitral regurgitation and 37 had mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse by angiography. Ten patients had no angiographic regurgitation (4 rheumatic, 6 prolapse). The remaining patients included 86 with suspected aortic regurgitation and 130 with suspected tricuspid regurgitation. Angiographically 74 had aortic regurgitation and 111 tricuspid regurgitation. The maximum size of regurgitant jets was evaluated in each patient by color flow mapping. The width of the jets was also taken into consideration. In 29 of the 31 with rheumatic regurgitation and 67 of the 74 with aortic regurgitation by angiography, abnormal regurgitant signals were detected by color flow mapping. In both rheumatic mitral regurgitation and aortic regurgitation, color Doppler estimation of the jets correlated well with angiographic grading. The regurgitant jets in these regurgitation were not eccentric. In the 37 with mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse by left ventriculography, abnormal jets were detected in 35 by color flow mapping. However, the regurgitant jets were eccentric and color Doppler estimation of the jets correlated poorly with angiographic grading. In patients with tricuspid regurgitation, color Doppler grading of regurgitation correlated poorly with right ventriculographic grading. A color Doppler underestimation was observed in 48%. In conclusion, color Doppler flow mapping is useful in the noninvasive detection and semiquantification of rheumatic mitral regurgitation and aortic regurgitation having non-eccentric jets, although this technique often underestimates the severity of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse.     

Color Doppler regurgitant jet area for evaluating eccenteric mitral regurgitation: An animal study with quantified mitral regurgitation

Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to rigorously evaluate the accuracy of the color Doppler jet area planimetry method for quantifying chronic mitral regurgitation.Background. Although the color Doppler jet area has been widely used clinically for evaluating the severity of mitral regurgitation, there have been no studies comparing the color jet area with a strictly quantifiable reference standard for determining regurgitant volume.Methods. In six sheep with surgically produced chronic mitral regurgitation, 24 hemodynamically different states were obtained. Maximal color Doppler jet area for each state was obtained with a Vingmed 750. Image data were directly transferred in digital format to a microcomputer. Mitral regurgitation was quantified by the peak and mean regurgitant flow rates, regurgitant stroke volumes and regurgitant fractions determined using mitral and aortic electromagnetic flow probes.Results. Mean regurgitant volumes varied from 0.19 to 2.4 liters/ min (mean [±SD] 1.2 ± 0.59), regurgitant stroke volumes from 1.8 to 29 ml/beat (mean 11 ± 6.2), peak regurgitant volumes from 1.0 to 8.1 liters/min (mean 3.5 ± 2.1) and regurgitant fractions from 8.0% to 54% (mean 29 ± 12%). Twenty-two of 24 jets were eccentric. Simple linear regression analysis between maximal color jet areas and peak and mean regurgitant flow rates, regurgitant stroke volumes and regurgitant fractions showed correlation, with r = 0.68 (SEE 0.64 cm²), r = 0.63 (SEE 0.67 cm²), r = 0.63 (SEE 0.67 cm²) and r = 0.58 (SEE 0.71 cm²), respectively. Univariate regression comparing regurgitant jet area with cardiac output, stroke volume, systolic left ventricular pressure, pressure gradient, left ventricular/ left atrial pressure gradient, left atrial mean pressure, left atrial vwave pressure, systemic vascular resistance and maximal jet velocity showed poor correlation (0.08 < r < 0.53, SEE > 0.76 cm²).Conclusions. This study demonstrates that color Doppler jet area has limited use for evaluating the severity of mitral regurgitation with eccentric jets.     

Aortic regurgitation: quantitative methods by echocardiography

Quantification of aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common and difficult clinical problem. The severity of regurgitation has traditionally been estimated with the use of contrast aortography, which is impractical as a screening tool or for serial examinations. In the past two decades, Doppler echocardiography has emerged as an important tool in the quantification of AR. Pulsed Doppler mapping of the depth of the regurgitant jet into the left ventricle was one of the initial echocardiographic methods used for this purpose. The slope and pressure (or velocity) half-time of continuous-wave Doppler profiles of regurgitant jets are also useful. These Doppler techniques may be used to determine the regurgitant volume or regurgitant fraction in patients with AR. The use of color Doppler to measure the height (or cross-sectional area) of the regurgitant jet relative to the height (cross-sectional area) of the left ventricular outflow tract is both sensitive and specific in the quantification of AR. More recently, the continuity principle has been used to determine the effective aortic regurgitant orifice area, which increases as AR becomes more severe. Although this is a promising tool, calculation of this value is not yet common practice in most echocardiography laboratories. Although no single echocardiographic technique is without limitations, all have some validity, and it is reasonable to use a combination of them to obtain a composite estimate of the severity of AR.