Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: a true benefit for the patient

OBJECTIVES: Redo mitral valve surgery via sternotomy is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated a minimally invasive technique for mitral valve redo procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of a series of 394 patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement via a right minithoracotomy, 39 patients underwent redo mitral valve surgery (59+/-13 years, 23 female). Previous cardiac surgeries included 17 patients with mitral valve repair, 6 patients with mitral valve replacement, 3 patients with aortic valve replacement, 2 patients with atrial septal defect closure, and 11 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In all cases, femoro-femoral cannulation was performed. The port access technique was applied in patients undergoing redo valve surgery. In patients with prior CABG, the operation was performed using deep hypothermia and ventricular fibrillation. RESULTS: In all cases, sternotomy was avoided. The mitral valve was replaced in 20 patients and repaired in 19. Time of surgery and cross-clamp time were comparable with the overall series (168+/-73 [redo] vs 168+/-58 min and 52+/-21 [redo] vs 58+/-25 min). Mortality was 5.1%. One patient had transient hemiplegia due to the migration of the endoclamp. All other patients had uneventful outcomes and normal mitral valve function at 3-month's follow-up. CONCLUSION: Redo mitral valve surgery can be performed safely using a minimally invasive approach in patients with a previous sternotomy. The right lateral minithoracotomy offers excellent exposure. It minimizes the need for cardiac dissection, and thus, the risk for injury. Avoiding a resternotomy increases patient comfort of redo mitral valve surgery.     

Port-Access mitral valve surgery: summary of results

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the short-term results of an initial experience with minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery using the Port-Access approach in terms of feasibility, safety, and reproducibility. METHODS: Between October 1995 and October 1997, 151 minimally invasive cardiac valve procedures were performed at our institution using the Port-Access approach. The patients' mean age was 58.1 years (range 21 to 91 years) and 50% were male. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 35 (23.2%) patients, mitral valve repair in 56 (37.1%) patients, mitral valve replacement in 36 (23.8%) patients, and complex valve procedures in 24 (15.9%) patients. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate for isolated mitral valve surgery was 1.1% (1/92) and for all mitral valve surgery 3.5% (4/113). The operative mortality rate for isolated aortic valve patients was 5.7% (2/35). For the total group the operating mortality was 4% (6/151). Early complications for mitral valve patients included reoperation for bleeding or tamponade in 5 (4.4%) patients, myocardial infarction in 2 (1.2%) patients, and transient ischemic attack and wound infection in 1 (0.1%) patient each. One patient required reoperation for mitral valve failure that resulted in aortic dissection unrelated to the Endoaortic Clamp catheter and ultimately led to death. Two (5.6%) aortic valve patients required reoperation for bleeding and two (5.6%) required reoperation for tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive Port-Access techniques can be applied to most patients with valvular heart disease with minimal morbidity and mortality and good postoperative valve function and may be the preferred approach for isolated mitral and aortic valve surgery.     

Minimally Invasive Approach for Redo Mitral Valve Surgery: A True Benefit for the Patient

ABSTRACT Objectives Redo mitral valve surgery via sternotomy is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated a minimally invasive technique for mitral valve redo procedures. Material and Methods: Out of a series of 394 patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement via a right minithoracotomy, 39 patients underwent redo mitral valve surgery (59 ± 13 years, 23 female). Previous cardiac surgeries included 17 patients with mitral valve repair, 6 patients with mitral valve replacement, 3 patients with aortic valve replacement, 2 patients with atrial septal defect closure, and 11 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In all cases, femoro-femoral cannulation was performed. The port access technique was applied in patients undergoing redo valve surgery. In patients with prior CABG, the operation was performed using deep hypothermia and ventricular fibrillation. Results: In all cases, sternotomy was avoided. The mitral valve was replaced in 20 patients and repaired in 19. Time of surgery and cross-clamp time were comparable with the overall series (168 ± 73 [redo] vs 168 ± 58 min and 52 ± 21 [redo] vs 58 ± 25 min). Mortality was 5.1%. One patient had transient hemiplegia due to the migration of the endoclamp. All other patients had uneventful outcomes and normal mitral valve function at 3-month's follow-up. Conclusion: Redo mitral valve surgery can be performed safely using a minimally invasive approach in patients with a previous sternotomy. The right lateral minithoracotomy offers excellent exposure. It minimizes the need for cardiac dissection, and thus, the risk for injury. Avoiding a resternotomy increases patient comfort of redo mitral valve surgery.     

Surgical treatment of permanent atrial fibrillation during heart valve surgery

A simple strategy to abolish permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing heart valve surgery is described. The concept includes: (1) endocardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation creating two encircling isolation lesions around the left and the right pulmonary veins (LPV, RPV) and a connection line between both; (2) antiarrhythmic protection with amiodarone for 3 months. Between 02/01 and 02/02 29 patients underwent surgical AF ablation procedures associated with primary valve operations (mitral, n=22; aortic, n=6; aortic+mitral, n=1). Six months after surgery 87.5% (14 of 16) were in sinus rhythm (SR), particularly all patients with an LA diameter of <56 mm had SR.     

Operation methods and results in repeated open heart surgery for acquired valvular disease

Fifty-six patients who underwent repeated open heart surgery for acquired valvular disease are presented. Their mean ages were 48 years and mean interval between initial and second operation were 6 years. Preoperative functional status (NYHA) were class II in 11, class III in 40 and class IV in 5. The indications for repeated open heart surgery were mitral re-stenosis in eight, mitral and aortic regurgitation after valvuloplasty in 26, artificial valve failure in 32, perivalvular leakage in 2, left atrial thrombus formation in 1 and aggravation of rheumatic changes of non-operated other valves in 3. Dissection of adhesive tissue around the heart was limited to the aortic root for prevention of cardiac injuries and minimizing bleeding. In all cases, myocardial protection was achieved with intermittent infusion of cold crystalloid cardioplegic solution with topical myocardial cooling during single period of aortic clamping. Adequate left ventricular hypothermic protection was obtained by cold physiological saline that was filled in left pleural cavity. Postoperative low cardiac output syndrome was developed in only 2. Three patients (5.4%) died of left ventricular rupture and of multiple organ failure within thirty days and 4 patients (7.1%) died of prosthetic valve endocarditis, cerebral bleeding and sudden death in late follow-up periods. These results suggested that the operative mortality and morbidity for repeated valve surgery with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass was not different from that for initial valve surgery. So we believe that repeated open heart surgery for acquired valvular disease should be done prior to deterioration of patient's clinical condition.     

Inhaled prostacyclin, nitric oxide, and nitroprusside in pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve replacement

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hypertension increases morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing heart surgery. Mitral valve stenosis is frequently associated with an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Cardiopulmonary bypass exacerbates pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of inhaled prostacyclin and nitric oxide and the administration of i.v. nitroprusside during cardiac surgery with a clinical, pharmacodynamic dose-response, prospective, randomized, and double-blind study (Group A: inhaled prostacyclin; Group B: inhaled nitric oxide; Group C: nitroprusside). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with mitral valve stenosis and elevated PVR (>200 dynes sec/cm5) after mitral valve surgery were studied. Inhaled prostacyclin and nitric oxide were administered at concentrations of 10 g/min and 20 ppm, respectively. Nitroprusside i.v. was administered at the dose of 5-15 g/min. RESULTS: Prostacyclin and nitric oxide produced a significant dose-related decrease of mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and transpulmonary gradient. A significant increase in cardiac output was observed in both groups. In Group C, nitroprusside administration was interrupted in 62% patients due to occurrence of systemic hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled prostacyclin and nitric oxide are effective in the treatment of postoperative pulmonary hypertension in patients with mitral valve stenosis undergoing mitral valve surgery. Both drugs improve cardiac output and reduce mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and trans-pulmonary gradient. They may be useful in patients with acute right ventricular failure following cardiac surgery. In comparison to nitric oxide, inhaled prostacyclin is free from toxic side effects and is easier to administer.     

The effect of concomitant radiofrequency ablation and surgical technique (repair versus replacement) on release of cardiac biomarkers during mitral valve surgery

All patients undergoing heart surgery experience a certain amount of nonspecific myocardial injury documented by the release of cardiac biomarkers and associated with poor outcome. We investigated the role of unipolar radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation on the release of cardiac biomarkers in 71 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and concomitant left atrial ablation case-matched with 71 patients undergoing isolated mitral surgery. The study was powered to detect a 3 ng/mL difference. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of cardiac troponin I (10 +/- 5.3 versus 12 + 10.4 ng/mL; P = 0.7) or creatine kinase-MB (50 +/- 21.8 versus 57 +/- 62.0 ng/mL; P = 0.5) release. Postoperative peak cardiac troponin I levels had univariate associations with the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.002) and aortic cross-clamping (P = 0.001) and with the surgical technique (15 +/- 12 ng/mL for mitral valve replacement versus 9 +/- 4.8 for mitral valve repair; P = 0.0007) at univariate analysis. Mitral valve replacement was the only independent predictor of postoperative peak release of cardiac troponin I identified with multivariate analysis (P = 0.005). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation does not significantly increase cardiac biomarker release compared with isolated mitral surgery; mitral valve repair is associated with less release of cardiac biomarkers compared with mitral valve replacement.     

Have the results of mitral valve replacement improved?

To test the contention that the results of cardiac surgery are better in recent years, we analyzed patients undergoing isolated or combined mitral valve replacement in an earlier era (1975 to July, 1979; n = 478) and a later era (July, 1979, to July, 1983; n = 341). Patients in the later era were older, had a higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and a higher prevalence of ischemic mitral valve disease and a lower one of rheumatic mitral disease. Patients operated on in the later era had, on the average, longer and more extensive operations. Patients in the later era had a slightly but inconclusively lower 2 week and 4 1/2 year survival rate than those in the earlier era; their hazard functions were similar. A higher proportion of the deaths in the later era than in the earlier era were due to chronic heart failure. However, neither the era nor the specific year in which a patient was operated on was a risk factor for death in a multivariate analysis. By contrast, in many subsets of patients with congenital and ischemic heart disease, the risks have been shown to be lower in the current era. Continuing delay in advising mitral valve replacement and imperfections in the methods for myocardial protection are probably responsible for this lack of improvement across time.     

Mitral Valve Reconstruction and Mitral Valve Replacement for Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency

Abstract Background: Patients with ischemic mitral incompetence have a high operative risk whether the valve is repaired or replaced. The advantage of repair over replacement is unclear in this group of patients. Methods: Between April 1986 and December 1994, 232 patients underwent surgery for ischemic mitral valve insufficiency; mitral valve replacement was performed in 98 of them. Operative mortality was 13.3%. The actuarial survival rate after 5 years was 73.3%. The surgical risk in patients whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 10%-30% (operative mortality 50.0%) was higher than in those whose LVEF was greater than 30%. Valve reconstruction was performed in 102 patients. Operative mortality in this patient group was 14.7%. The surgical risk in patients whose LVEF was 30% was higher (operative mortality 42.9%). Results: The total actuarial survival rate of all patients was 64.4% after 5 years. Mortality during follow-up was higher in patients with residual mitral valve insufficiency greater than grade I after mitral valve reconstruction. Twenty-four patients with severly impaired left ventricular function underwent heart transplantation. Operative mortality in this group was 12.5%. Eight patients received left ventricular aneurysmectomy in addition to valve surgery, three of them died early. Conclusions: We conclude that patients with highly impaired left ventricular function and ischemic mitral insufficiency are at too great a risk for either valve reconstruction or replacement. Cardiac transplantation should be considered for this patient group. However, patients with ischemic mitral insufficiency and moderately impaired left ventricular function can undergo valve reconstruction or replacement with an acceptable prognosis. The goal of mitral valve reconstruction should be reducing mitral valve insufficiency to at least grade I. If this is not achieved, the prognosis after repair is worse than after valve replacement, therefore, the surgeon should replace the valve without delay.     

Ventricular function following mitral valve surgery: assessment using radionuclide ventriculography

The effects of mitral valve replacement or commissurotomy on cardiac function were studied using radionuclide ventriculography in 13 patients with chronic mitral stenosis and in 8 with chronic mitral regurgitation, before and after mitral valve surgery. The stenosis resulted from rheumatic heart disease in all instances while regurgitation was due to mitral valve prolapse in three patients and rheumatic heart disease in five. Fourteen patients had a Carpentier-Edwards valve inserted and 4 a Lillehei-Kaster disc valve. Three patients with mitral stenosis had an open commissurotomy. All patients underwent supine-rest and symptom-limited exercise radionuclide ventriculography shortly before and 6 to 12 months after operation. The data obtained showed that left ventricular function remained unchanged postoperatively in patients with mitral stenosis but deteriorated in those with mitral regurgitation. Right ventricular function improved postoperatively in those with mitral stenosis but remained unchanged in patients who had regurgitation.     

Desflurane versus propofol in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial ischemic damage is reduced by volatile anesthetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, but it is unknown whether this benefit exists in patients undergoing valvular surgery with ischemia-reperfusion injury related to cardioplegic arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass. This study compared cardiac troponin release in patients receiving either volatile anesthetics or total intravenous anesthesia for mitral valve surgery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Interventions: Fifty-nine patients received the volatile anesthetic desflurane for 30 minutes before cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas 61 patients received a total intravenous anesthetic with propofol. All patients had an opioid-based anesthetic for the mitral valve surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Peak postoperative troponin I release was measured as a marker of myocardial necrosis after mitral valve surgery. Patient mean age was 60 years, and 54% were men. There was no significant (p = 0.7) reduction in median (25th-75th percentiles) postoperative peak troponin, 11.0 (7.5-17.4) ng/dL in the desflurane group versus 11.5 (6.9-18.0) ng/dL in the propofol group. A subgroup of patients with concomitant coronary artery disease had the expected reduction (p = 0.02) of peak troponin I in those receiving desflurane, 14.0 (9.7-17.3) ng/dL, when compared with patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia, 31.6 (15.7-52.0) ng/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial damage measured by cardiac troponin release was not reduced by volatile anesthetics in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, whereas it was reduced in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease.     

Comparison of minithoracotomy and conventional sternotomy approaches for valve surgery

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients undergoing valve surgery through a minithoracotomy approach with a matched group undergoing conventional valve surgery. DESIGN: Control study. SETTING: University hospital, single center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one consecutive patients scheduled for valve surgery by minithoracotomy approach were matched with a similar group of patients operated on by the sternotomy approach. INTERVENTIONS: Criteria for matching included type of valve procedure (aortic valve replacement or mitral valve repair), age, surgeons, and left ventricular function. Two surgeons performed the surgical procedures. Perioperative care was standardized for all patients. Operative and postoperative data were recorded.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 41 pairs of patients were correctly matched, except for left ventricular function (n = 1). Twenty patients underwent mitral valve repair and 62 aortic valve replacement. Preoperative demographic data and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamping, and surgery times were longer in the minithoracotomy group (p < 0.05). In 3 patients, the minithoracotomy approach had to be converted into a sternotomy during the surgical procedure for better visualization. Minithoracotomy patients had significantly increased postoperative total blood loss (p < 0.05). No difference was found between the groups for extubation time and intensive care or in-hospital lengths of stay. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that valve surgery is feasible in many cases through minithoracotomy. Nevertheless, this approach increases surgical complexity and in this comparative study no significant benefit was shown.     

Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the quality of valve replacement and repair performed through minimally invasive incisions as compared to the standard operation for aortic and mitral valve replacement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the advent of minimally invasive laparoscopic approaches to orthopedic surgery, urology, general surgery, and thoracic surgery, it now is apparent that standard cardiac valve operations can be performed through very small incisions with similar approaches. METHODS: Eighty-four patients underwent minimally invasive aortic (n = 41) and minimally invasive mitral valve repair and replacement (n = 43) between July 1996 and April 1997. Demographics, procedures, operative techniques, and postoperative morbidity and mortality were calculated, and a subset of the first 50 patients was compared to a 50-patient cohort who underwent the same operation through a conventional median sternotomy. Demographics, postoperative morbidity and mortality, patient satisfaction, and charges were compared. RESULTS: Of the 84 patients, there were 2 operative mortalities both in class IV aortic patients from multisystem organ failure. There was no operative mortality in the patients undergoing mitral valve replacement or repair. The operations were carried out with the same accuracy and attention to detail as with the conventional operation. There was minimal postoperative bleeding, cerebral vascular accidents, or other major morbidity. Groin cannulation complications primarily were related to atherosclerotic femoral arteries. A comparison of the minimally invasive to the conventional group, although operative time and ischemia time was higher in minimally invasive group, the requirement for erythrocytes was significantly less, patient satisfaction was significantly greater, and charges were approximately 20% less than those in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve surgery in patients without coronary disease can be done safely and accurately through small incisions. Patient satisfaction is up, return to normality is higher, and requirement for postrehabilitation services is less. In addition, the charges are approximately 20% less. These results serve as a paradigm for the future in terms of valve surgery in the managed care environment.     

Surgical treatment of ischaemic valve disease

Mitral valve regurgitation secondary to ischaemic heart disease carries a significant mortality even after open-heart surgery. In this study, 21 patients with mitral regurgitation associated with ischaemic heart disease were evaluated with respect to valvular pathology. Pathological examination of the mitral valve revealed chorda elongation or rupture in seven patients (group 1), papillary muscle dysfunction in 10 (group 2), and papillary muscle rupture in four (group 3). Significant preoperative characteristics in each group were subacute haemodynamic deterioration in group 1, chronic severe left ventricular failure in group 2, and a high incidence of acute renal failure associated with haemodynamic shock in group 3. Mitral valve plasty was performed in six patients and mitral valve replacement, using the St Jude Medical valve, in 15. Fourteen patients underwent mitral valve surgery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Mitral plasty was applied to the patients with low left ventricular function with mean(s.d.) fraction shortening of 19.2(6.2)% compared with 30.2(8.4)% in patients with mitral valve replacement. There were no operative deaths. Of four late deaths, two in group 1 resulted from infection and myocardial infarction, respectively, and one in group 2 resulted from arrhythmia. One patient in group 3 died from renal failure. It is suggested that incorporation of these therapeutic concepts may lead to satisfactory results in the surgical treatment of ischaemic mitral regurgitation.     

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: surgical techniques and anesthetic problems]

OBJECTIVE: To review current data on minimally invasive cardiac surgery. DATA SOURCES: Search through the Medline data base of French or English articles. DATA EXTRACTION: The articles were analysed to make a synthesis of the various techniques with their main indications and contra-indications. DATA SYNTHESIS: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery includes various surgical procedures. The usual techniques are described, their major benefits and drawbacks are discussed. The main goals of anaesthetic management are preservation of ventricular function and systemic perfusion, detection and treatment of myocardial ischaemia, prevention of hypothermia in case of coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart via sternotomy, intermittent selective ventilation of the collapsed lung using CPAP in case of limited thoracotomy. Expertise in transoesophageal echocardiography is essential for insertion and checking the accurate positioning of the various catheters of the endovascular CPB Heartport system (pulmonary vent, endosinus catheter, venous cannula, endoaortic clamp) allowing coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery through limited thoracotomy and finally, detection of retained intracardiac air and assessment of complete clearing of cardiac cavities after mitral valve surgery through limited thoracotomy and aortic valve surgery via ministernotomy. Short-acting anaesthetic agents allow rapid recovery from anaesthesia, early extubation and discharge to the surgical ward within 24 h, whereas overall time spent in the operating room is often longer than with conventional cardiac surgery.     

Can late survival of patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be impacted by intervention on the valve?

BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation is known to be associated with poor long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting; however, our ability to alter that outcome with intervention on the valve is unclear. The decision to address the valve is most challenging for patients with only moderate mitral regurgitation, particularly with the popularization of off-pump surgery. We therefore reviewed early and late outcomes of patients undergoing revascularization with or without mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Patients with moderate mitral regurgitation undergoing revascularization with and without mitral surgery between January 1991 and September 1996 were identified retrospectively. Operative notes were reviewed and patients with structural valve disease excluded. Perioperative events and late outcomes as determined by telephone contact and search of the social security death index (survival data 97% complete) were compared. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients with moderate mitral regurgitation underwent revascularization alone (n = 142) or with mitral repair or replacement (n = 34). Those undergoing revascularization alone had a higher serum creatinine, somewhat less mitral regurgitation, and lower New York Heart Association functional class preoperatively. Operative mortality was greater with valve surgery (21% vs 9%, p = 0.047). Actuarial survival of both groups at 5 years was similar (52% vs 58%, p = NS); however, when stratified by preoperative functional class, those with more advanced heart failure preoperatively had superior late survival if their mitral valve was intervened upon. CONCLUSIONS: The late survival of patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary revascularization remains poor; however, intervention on the mitral valve appears to benefit those with symptomatic heart failure.     

Partial Left Ventriculectomy in Patients with Dilated Failing Ventricle

BACKGROUND: While partial left ventriculectomy (PLV) improves left ventricular energetic efficiency, concomitant reduction in mitral regurgitation may improve ventricular function. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-five patients undergoing lateral ventricular wall excision between the papillary muscles (lateral PLV) and 101 patients with an additional excision of papillary muscles and mitral valve replacement (extended PLV) were compared with 65 patients undergoing excision of anterior wall or ventricular aneurysm (anterior PLV). RESULTS: All patients had reduced functional capacity, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III to IV (3.62+/-0.49). Etiologies were cardiomyopathy (37.3%), coronary artery disease (32.3%), valvular disease (19.7%), Chagas' disease (7.8%), and others (2.8%). Patients undergoing lateral and extended PLV had cardiomyopathy as the primary cause of heart failure, while a majority of anterior PLV patients had ischemic disease. Associated procedures included mitral valvuloplasty or replacement (lateral PLV 67%, extended PLV 100%, anterior PLV 40%) and tricuspid annuloplasty (67%, 76%, 28%, respectively.) In each group after surgery, end-systolic dimension decreased more than end-diastolic dimension despite reduced mitral regurgitation. Although extended PLV resulted in greater volume reduction and less mitral regurgitation, these patients had delayed recovery and poor survival. Patients with valvular disease had the most advanced myocardial hypertrophy with the best survival, while those with Chagas' disease had more severe myocarditis, interstitial fibrosis, and the poorest survival. CONCLUSION: Lateral PLV improved hemodynamics and functional capacity as much as aneurysmectomy by reducing ventricular volume and mitral regurgitation. Inclusion and exclusion criteria have to be sought to make PLV safer and more effective.     

Port-Access cardiac surgery using endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass: theory, practice, and results

BACKGROUND: Reduction of surgical trauma is the aim of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. This can be achieved by reducing the size of the incision or by eliminating or changing the cardiopulmonary bypass system. However, certain cardiac surgical procedures, such as valvular surgery and complex multivessel coronary artery surgery, are not feasible without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Therefore endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass may allow reduction of surgical trauma for these patients. METHODS: Since its first application in April 1995, more than 1100 procedures have been performed worldwide using the EndoCPB endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system. The authors' experience consists of 60 Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 34 Port-Access mitral valve procedures (18 replacements, 16 repairs), 5 atrial septal defect closures, and 3 atrial myxoma removals. RESULTS: The patient survival rate was 99%, the incidence of perioperative stroke was 1%, and the incidence of aortic dissection was 1%. In the Port-Access mitral valve and atrial septal defect patients, the survival rate was 100% with no peri- or postoperative complications. Peri- and postoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed no perivalvular leak or remaining mitral insufficiency after valve repair. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoCPB endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system allows the application of true Port-Access minimally invasive cardiac surgery in procedures that require the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Sternotomy and its potential complications can be avoided, and the surgical procedures can be performed safely on an empty, arrested heart with adequate myocardial protection.     

The outcome and criteria for mitral valve surgery in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation

Objectives: Mitral valve surgery for the correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with ischemic heart disease has been associated with poor prognosis. The criteria for selecting an appropriate surgical procedure are not clearly defined. The objectives of this study were to clarify the criteria for mitral valve manipulation and the outcome in patients with ischemic MR.Methods: Twenty patients with ischemic MR were proposed for surgery. Ten of them (group A) had grade II MR and underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The remaining 10 patients with grade III or more MR underwent both CABG and mitral valve repair (group B). Postoperative left ventricular function and outcome were compared.Results: Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) in group A was significantly smaller, while preoperative ejection fraction (EF) was almost equal between the groups. EF demonstrated a significant improvement in group A postoperatively, but no changes in group B. Two of group B died following surgery. The other patients were successfully treated with surgery which diminished MR. Congestive heart failure (CHF) developed in 2 patients of group B during follow-up and in none of group A. The 5-year freedom from CHF and the 5-year survival rate in group A were significantly greater than those in group B.Conclusions: Deterioration of mitral valve function, which necessitated mitral valve repair, was more frequent in the impaired and enlarged hearts. Although mitral repair was beneficial for diminishing MR and New York Heart Association, postoperative course in patients with ischemic MR depended on the preoperative LVESVI.     

Superior biatrial septotomy and beating heart approach for aortic and mitral valve replacement in a patient with refractory cardiac failure

Time-consuming and complex cardiac surgery remains a challenge in patients with impaired ventricular function and consequently necessary prolonged cardioplegic arrest may jeopardize a fragile myocardial status. The case is reported of a 63-year-old male patient with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and history of refractory cardiac failure who successfully underwent a beating heart aortic and mitral valve replacement through a superior biatrial septotomy. Technical considerations and advantages related to this specific surgical access combined with a beating heart approach are discussed.