The prothrombin gene G20210A variant: prevalence in a U.K. anticoagulant clinic population

We have investigated the prevalence of a recently reported genetic variation in the prothrombin gene (G20210A) in patients with an objectively confirmed history of venous thrombosis. 12/219 patients (5.5%) were found to be heterozygous carriers of the 20210 A allele. The incidence of the 20210 A allele in a group of 164 healthy controls was 1.2% (allele frequency 0.61%, 95% CI 0.08–2.19). When patients with a known alternative hereditary risk factor for venous thrombosis (factor V Leiden mutation or deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S) were excluded, the G20210A variant was found to increase the risk for venous thrombosis by approximately 5-fold (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.16–25.0). This prothrombin gene sequence variation adds further to the list of recognized genetic risk factors for thrombophilia.     

The 20210 G-->A mutation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene and the risk for arterial thrombotic disease

A sequence variation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin (PT) gene (20210 G-->A) was recently claimed to be associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increased risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. We examined the prevalence of the 20210 A allele in the prothrombin gene in 400 healthy controls and in 263 patients with proven premature atherosclerotic disease. In addition, we measured prothrombin, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex and D-dimer levels in plasma from carrier and non-carrier patients. The frequency of the variant allele was 1% in the control subjects and 2.7% in the patient group, yielding a relative risk (RR) for the 20210 A allele of 2.7 (95% CI 0.8-9.4). All heterozygotes in the patient group were found to have had a myocardial infarction (MI), yielding a RR for MI of 4.2 (95% CI 1.2-14.6). Plasma prothrombin levels in carriers (126+/-10) were higher than in non-carriers (103+/-1, P=0.02). The levels of TAT complexes (16+/-9 v 6+/-1 microg/ml, P=0.02) as well as of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (1.5+/-0.3 v 1.0+/-0.1 nmol/l, P=0.02) were also elevated in carriers of the mutation. Our findings suggest that the 20210 G-->A mutation in the prothrombin gene is a genetic risk factor for MI. In addition, our data provide evidence for an association of the mutation with excessive thrombin generation, which may contribute to the understanding of its role in venous and arterial disease.     

Prevalence of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation in Northwestern Greece and association with venous thromboembolism.

AIM: The G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene is a genetic risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Variability exists in the mutation prevalence in both normal individuals and VTE patients. The aim of this study was to determine the mutation prevalence in Northwestern Greece and evaluate its association with VTE. METHODS: Presence of the G20210A mutation was investigated using DNA analysis in 176 consecutive patients with a history of venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and in 300 healthy controls, all Caucasian residents of Northwestern Greece. RESULTS: The mutation was present 12 patients (6.8%) and 8 controls (2.7%). The odds ratio for presence of the mutation versus the normal genotype in VTE was 2.7 (95% CI: 1.1 to 6.7), which was statistically significant. The prevalence of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation in Northwestern Greece is 2.7% (95% CI: 0.8% to 4.4%) with an allele frequency of 1.3% (95% CI: 0.4% to 2.3%). CONCLUSION: The G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene is associated with VTE in the Caucasian residents of this geographic region.     

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A and the risk of venous thrombosis among cancer patients

Cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). The association of factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A variant with VT in cancer patients is not established. We genotyped 101 cancer patients with VT and 101 cancer patients without VT for these polymorphisms. Five cases and three controls were heterozygous for FVL, yielding an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-10.7). Five cases and no controls were heterozygous for prothrombin 20210A, for an odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 0.9-infinity). Prothrombin 20210A may be associated with VT risk among cancer patients.     

Risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of the prothrombin G20210A variant and factor V Leiden and their interaction with oral contraceptives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prothrombin G20210A mutation and factor V Leiden have been found to be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, but the reported prevalences of the prothrombin gene variant both in the normal population and in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) vary greatly in the literature. Moreover, the influence of oral contraceptives (OC) on thrombotic events in patients with the prothrombin G20210A variant has not been well established. In this study we evaluate both circumstances. DESIGN AND METHODS: A case-control study was run on 229 patients with DVT and 246 healthy controls. The patients' history of thrombosis and acquired thrombotic risk factors, especially OC, were recorded. Prothrombin G20210A mutation, factor V Leiden, antithrombin, heparin II cofactor, plasminogen and proteins C and S were evaluated. RESULTS: Seven and a half percent of the patients and 2.9% of the controls were carriers of the prothrombin mutation, while 12.2% of the patients and 1.6% of the controls had factor V Leiden. Among the 229 DVT patients there were 130 patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia (first thrombotic event occurring before the age of 45 years or positive family history of thrombosis or recurrent venous thrombosis). Ten percent of these 130 patients were carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation and 18.5% had the factor V Leiden mutation. The odds ratios (OR) for DVT risk were: 2.4 (95% CI, 1.0-6.3) for the total DVT patients and 5.2 (95% CI, 1.4-19.5) for the patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia with the prothrombin mutation. The risk of thrombosis was 6.9 (95% CI, 2.3-20.6) for the DVT patients and 14.3 (95% CI, 3.3-64.6) for the patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia with factor V Leiden. Fifty-five percent of the patients with combined congenital defects (prothrombin mutation G20210A plus another congenital defect) had recurrent thrombosis. In women receiving OC the risk of DVT was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.5-8.2) that of the patients not receiving OC. When women with combined defects were also taking OC, the risk of thrombosis increased significantly. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation in the healthy population in our study is similar to that observed in other southern European countries. The prothrombin G20210A mutation does not by itself seem to be a high thrombotic risk factor. However, when it is present together with other thrombotic risk factors, the predicted risk of thrombotic events increases. The use of OC by women with the prothrombin G20210A variant or FV Leiden, either alone or combined with other thrombotic risk factors, was associated with a significant increase in the risk of venous thrombosis.     

Prospective study of the G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene,plasma prothrombin concentration,and incidence of venous thromboembolism

Case-control studies have indicated increased risk of venous thrombosis associated with the prothrombin gene G20210A polymorphism and with elevated plasma prothrombin levels. We sought to confirm these results in a prospective population-based study of 21,690 persons. We measured G20210A and prothrombin antigen on pre-event blood samples of 302 participants who developed venous thromboembolism (VTE) and 626 participants who remained free of VTE. Approximately 4.0% of cases and 2.4% of controls carried the G20210A polymorphism, but only one of 137 African Americans did. The odds ratio in whites was 1.87 (95% CI = 0.85, 4.11)--higher for those who reported a prior history of VTE (OR = 5.44) than those reporting no VTE history (OR = 1.41) and in those with idiopathic VTE (OR = 2.51) than those with secondary VTE (OR = 1.38). There was no association between venous thromboembolism and plasma prothrombin antigen level. We estimated that the G20210A polymorphism may account for approximately 2.5% of venous thromboembolism events in United States whites.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210 A variant in Bulgarian patients with pulmonary thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis.

Factor V Leiden mutation and prothrombin variant 20210 A are well-known risk factors for venous thrombosis (DVT). Recent papers have reported a lower prevalence of factor V Leiden in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) than in patients with deep venous thrombosis. The aim of the present study was to compare the prevalence of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin 20210 G <-- A mutation in patients with DVT and in patients with PTE. We studied 128 consecutive patients (45 with DVT, 40 with PTE, and 43 with DVT and PTE) for factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210 A. One hundred healthy persons matched by age and sex were used as controls. Factor V Leiden was present in five of the patients with PTE [12.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-23.5%; not significant], 15 of the patients with DVT (33.3%; 95% CI, 9.6-38.7%; P < 0.001), and 12 of the patients with DVT and PTE (27.9%; 95% CI, 4.8-33%; P = 0.001). Results for the prothrombin 20210 A mutation were as follows: four of 40 patients with PTE (10%; 95% CI, 0-13.3%; P = 0.46), nine of 45 (20%) of the patients with DVT (95% CI, 0.5-25.5%; P < 0.05) and eight of 43 with DVT and PTE were heterozygous (18.6%; 95% CI, 0-23.9%; P = 0.02). In conclusion, there is a significantly higher frequency of factor V Leiden among patients with DVT than in patients with PTE. However, there is no significant difference of factor V Leiden or 20210 A prothrombin mutation in patients with DVT than in patients with combined DVT/PTE, therefore patients with DVT, carriers of the mutations, do not appear to be at lower risk for pulmonary embolism.     

The A20210 allele in the prothrombin gene enhances the risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of inherited protein S deficiency.

Sixteen families with inherited protein S deficiency and venous thromboembolism (VT) were screened for the presence of factor V (FV) Leiden mutation and for the G20210A allele in the prothrombin gene. While FV Leiden was not detected in any of the families, protein S deficiency and prothrombin mutation were present in five families. To assess the risk of VT in carriers of the combined defects, a total of 92 members of the 16 families, including propositi, were examined. Thirty subjects were normal, 40 showed protein S deficiency, 10 the prothrombin mutation and 12 showed both abnormalities. When index cases were excluded, thrombosis history were present in 40.7% of protein S-deficient patients, 75% of patients with combined abnormality, one out of the 10 (10%) with prothrombin mutation and only one (3.3%) of the normal subjects. Relatives with combined defects showed the highest incidence rate of VT in comparison with normal relatives (rate ratio = 32.4), those with protein S deficiency an intermediate degree (rate ratio = 15.7), and G20210A relatives the lowest (rate ratio = 3.4). Relatives with combined defects had an increased risk of VT in comparison with relatives with protein S deficiency (incidence rate ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-5.41; P = 0.1). In conclusion, the presence of the prothrombin mutation seems to increase the risk of VT carriers of protein S deficiency, although additional families are required to fully estimate the magnitude of risk.     

Prevalence of the G1691A mutation in the factor V gene (factor V Leiden) and the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation in the Thai population

We investigated the prevalence of a genetic variation in the factor V gene (G1691A Leiden mutation) and the prothrombin gene (G20210A) using polymerase chain reaction techniques in samples from 500 normal Thai population and among 50 unselected Thai patients with an objectively confirmed history of deep venous thrombosis. The prevalence of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation in a group of 500 healthy controls was 0.2% in both groups (allele frequency of 0.1%). Of the 50 adult patients studied, none was a carrier of factor V Leiden or the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. Our findings confirm that the prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A gene mutation is lower among Asians than Caucasians and that the distribution of factor V Leiden is similar to that of the prothrombin G20210A variant. The low prevalence of these two mutations can, at least in part, account for the lower frequency of deep venous thrombosis reported in the Thai population. Screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation is of limited benefit and may not be cost-effective in Thai patients with the first episode of deep venous thrombosis.     

The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

Factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene are the most frequent abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether the risks due to the presence of either mutation are of the same magnitude. We compared the prevalence and incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in relatives with either mutation or both. The finding of different rates might influence the strategies for primary prevention of thrombosis in carriers of these mutations. The study population included 1076 relatives of probands with the prothrombin gene mutation, factor V Leiden or both who underwent screening for inherited thrombophilia and were found to be carriers of single mutations or double mutations or who were non-carriers. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 5.7% in relatives with the prothrombin gene mutation, 7.8% in those with factor V Leiden, 17.1% in those with both mutations and 2.5% in non-carriers. Annual incidences of thrombosis were 0.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.24], 0.19% (0.13-0.25), 0.42% (0.15-0.83) and 0.066% (0.03-0.11), respectively, and the relative risk of thrombosis was two times higher in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation, three times higher in those with factor V Leiden and six times higher in double carriers than in non-carriers. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation is slightly lower than that observed in carriers of factor V Leiden, whereas in carriers of both mutations it is two or three times higher. These findings suggest that lifelong primary anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is not needed in asymptomatic carriers of single or double mutations. Anticoagulant prophylaxis seems to be indicated only when transient risk factors for thrombosis coexist with mutations.     

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation may predispose to paradoxical embolism in subjects with patent foramen ovale.

The role of paradoxical embolism through patent foramen ovale as a mechanism of cryptogenic stroke is controversial. If a venous source of emboli is relevant, prothrombotic states should be associated with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke. We assessed the occurrence of several prothrombotic states (factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, deficiencies in protein S, protein C and antithrombin, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, elevated factor VIII, resistance to activated protein C) and classical risk factors for venous thrombosis in 57 adult patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale and in 104 matched controls. Prothrombotic states [odds ratio (OR) 2.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-6.5; P = 0.021], migraine with aura (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.8-10.8; P = 0.001) and classical risk factors for venous thrombosis (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.7; P = 0.037) were independent risk factors for cryptogenic stroke. In particular factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A associated with cryptogenic stroke (P = 0.022) whereas other coagulation abnormalities did not (P = 0.140). Among the patients with prothrombotic states, Valsalva manoeuvre was common at onset of stroke. Our results support the possibility of paradoxical embolism behind strokes in patients with patent foramen ovale.     

G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVES: The study was done to determine whether the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene increases the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), both alone and in combination with factor V Leiden. BACKGROUND: Several inherited defects of coagulation are associated with increased risk of first VTE, including a recently identified G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene. However, whether the presence of this mutation confers an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is controversial. METHODS: A total of 218 men with incident venous thromboembolism were genotyped for the prothrombin mutation and for factor V Leiden and were followed prospectively for recurrent VTE over a follow-up period of 7.3 years. RESULTS: A total of 29 men (13.3%) suffered recurrent VTE. Five of the 14 carriers of the prothrombin mutation developed recurrent VTE (35.7%; incidence rate = 8.70 per 100 person-years), while 24 of 204 individuals who did not carry the prothrombin mutation developed recurrent VTE (11.8%; incidence rate = 1.76 per 100 person-years). Thus, presence of the G20210A mutation was associated with an approximate fivefold increased risk for recurrent VTE (crude relative risk [RR] 4.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-12.9; p = 0.001; age-, smoking-, and body mass index-adjusted RR 5.28; 95% CI 2.0-14.0; p = 0.001). In these data, recurrence rates were similar among those with an isolated mutation in the prothrombin gene (18.2%) as compared to those with an isolated factor V Leiden mutation (19.2%). However, all three study participants who carried both mutations (100%) suffered a recurrent event during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective evaluation of 218 men, the presence ofprothrombin mutation was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent VTE, particularly among those who co-inherited factor V Leiden.     

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and protein C mutation frequency in Turkish venous thrombosis patients

Several inherited polymorphisms are associated with risk of venous thrombosis, including mutation at codon 506 of the factor V gene, mutation at position 20210 of the prothrombin gene, and mutations in the protein C gene. In this study, genotyping for factor V, prothrombin, and protein C mutations was performed in 50 patients and 25 control subjects by polymerase chain reaction-based analysis. The prevalence of factor V and prothrombin mutations was not significantly different from that in the general population. Nine of the patients had heterozygous protein C mutation. There was a high prevalence of the mutated protein C allele in the pulmonary emboli group (42.8%). Protein C mutation incidence was higher in the pulmonary emboli group than in the deep vein thrombosis (8.33%) and cerebral vein thrombosis (16.1%) groups. These results indicate that patients with protein C deficiency have a greater risk of thrombosis than patients with factor V or prothrombin G20210A mutation.     

The first homozygous family for prothrombin G20210A polymorphism reported in Latin America

The 20210A allele of the prothrombin gene is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism. In this study, we described manifestations of thrombosis in four generations of a Colombian family, with four 20210A homozygous carriers and six 20210G/A heterozygous carriers for polymorphism as well as unrelated participants from the same population. The levels of prothrombin in the 20210A homozygote patients were higher than in the normal 20210G homozygotes (133 + 11% and 92.3 + 12.4%, respectively, P < .01) and the 20210G/A heterozygotes (133 + 11% vs. 114.8 + 24%, P < .05). About 2 out of 4 20210A homozygotes and 5 out of 6 20210G/A heterozygous members of this family did not have venous thromboembolism or any other thrombotic manifestation even though one of them had been exposed to thrombotic risk factors. Thus, we posit the effect of 20210A on the thrombotic phenotype in this family seems to be weak.     

Linkage analysis demonstrates that the prothrombin G20210A mutation jointly influences plasma prothrombin levels and risk of thrombosis

Association studies suggest that the G20210A mutation (G to A substitution at nucleotide position 20210) in the prothrombin gene (PT) is associated with increased plasma prothrombin activity and with increased risk for venous thromboembolism. To test directly for linkage between this PT variant and plasma prothrombin activity we performed a family-based study. The G20210A genotypes and plasma prothrombin activity levels were determined in 435 individuals belonging to 22 extended Spanish families. The sample was composed of 388 homozygous (G/G) normal individuals and 43 heterozygote (G/A) and 4 homozygote (A/A) carriers for the G20210A mutation. The results of variance-component linkage analysis yielded a highly significant lod score of 3.6 (P = 2.4 x 10(-5)) between this mutation and a quantitative trait locus (QTL) that influences prothrombin activity. Importantly, a conditional linkage analysis that simultaneously accounted for association with the G20210A variant completely eliminated the linkage signal, which indicates that this mutation affects the function of the prothrombin gene. Additionally, a bivariate linkage analysis of plasma prothrombin activity and thrombosis significantly improved the linkage signal for prothrombin activity (lod score = 4.7; P = 1.5 x 10(-6)) and provided strong evidence that this QTL has a pleiotropic effect on the risk of thrombosis (lod score = 2.43; P =.0004). These results represent the first direct genetic evidence that a QTL in the PT gene influences prothrombin activity levels and susceptibility to thrombosis and strongly support the conclusion that G20210A is a functional polymorphism. (Blood. 2000;95:2780-2785)     

Prothrombin antigen levels in symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers of the 20210A prothrombin variant

A recently discovered variant in the prothrombin gene (20210A) has been found in approximately 5–10% of patients with venous thromboembolism. It has been shown that patients with this variant present with high levels of prothrombin in plasma and this is maintained to be the most likely mechanism by which the risk of thrombosis is increased. We have evaluated prothrombin antigen levels in 50 carriers of the 20210A allele and compared with non-carriers. 327 subjects were subdivided according to deficiency status and previous thrombosis. 30 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic carriers had increased mean prothrombin levels as compared to symptomatic ( n  = 178) or asymptomatic ( n  = 99) non-carriers. The percentage of subjects with prothrombin levels above cut-off values of 1.15 u/ml or 1.30 u/ml was significantly higher in carriers of the prothrombin variant as compared to non-carriers, regardless of a previous thrombosis. However, among non-carriers the percentage of those with prothrombin levels above cut-off values was significantly higher in the group of symptomatic as compared to asymptomatic individuals. In conclusion, increased prothrombin antigen levels, as detected by a specific ELISA, were found among 50 symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers of the 20210A prothrombin variant as well as among a large group of symptomatic non-carriers. The data are in agreement with those found by using functional tests for the determination of prothrombin levels in these patients.     

20210G/A mutation of prothrombin gene in a patient with deep venous thrombosis ad pulmonary embolism without other risk factors of thrombosis

A new genetic anomaly predisposing to venous thrombosis was described in 1996, namely the transition of guanine (G) to adenine (A) at position 20210 in the 3-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene. This mutation is associated with high levels of plasma prothrombin and increased risk of thrombotic events in the venous system. We report the case of a man who, lacking known risk factors for thrombosis, suffered a massive pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in both lower legs. Thrombophilic analysis confirmed that the patient and close relatives were carriers of the heterozygotic 20210G/A variant of the prothrombin gene. Two relatives with the genetic defect had also suffered some type of deep venous thrombosis.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation

The G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene is associated with an increased risk of a first venous thromboembolic episode; few data are available about the long-term risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism and it is not known whether or not carriers of the mutation should be recommended lifelong anticoagulant treatment after the first thrombosis. We investigated 624 patients, referred for previous objectively documented deep venous thrombosis of the legs or pulmonary embolism, to determine the risk of recurrent thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene after the first episode of venous thromboembolism. After exclusion of other inherited (anti-thrombin, protein C, protein S deficiency and factor V Leiden) or acquired (anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome) causes of thrombophilia, 52 heterozygous carriers of the prothrombin mutation were compared with 283 patients with normal genotype. The relative risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism was calculated between groups using a Cox's proportional hazard model. The patients with the prothrombin mutation had a risk for spontaneous recurrent venous thromboembolism similar to that of patients with normal genotype (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.3). The circumstances of the first event (spontaneous or secondary) did not produce any substantial variation in the risk for recurrence. In conclusion, the carriers of the prothrombin mutation should be treated with oral anticoagulants after a first deep venous thrombosis for a similar length of time as patients with a normal genotype.     

The prothrombin gene variant 20210A in venous and arterial thromboembolism

Several hereditary disorders affecting coagulation factors have been identified as prothrombotic risk factors. Recently, the prothrombin 20210 A/G mutation has been identified as a second important polymorphism involved in venous thrombosis. This article reviews all published information about this new procoagulant mutation. Our group has been involved in a number of studies about the role and importance of polymorphisms in thromboembolic disease, including the analysis of the prothrombin 20210 A/G mutation. Moreover, an extensive Medline literature search was made to complete the review using the key words: prothrombin mutation, 20210, venous or arterial thrombosis. The combination of environmental and genetic risk factors determines the relative risk that any individual has of suffering a thrombotic episode. Some genetic mutations affecting coagulation factors have been described. Recently, Poort et al. described a new mutation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene. The prothrombin 20210 G/A mutation, associated with elevated levels of factor II in plasma, significantly increases the risk of developing venous thrombosis. In fact, this polymorphism is the second most important genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis in Caucasian populations. Moreover, and supporting the multifactorial feature of thromboembolic diseases, this mutation greatly increases the possibility of developing a thrombotic episode when combined with other environmental or genetic risk factors. The role of this procoagulant mutation in arterial vascular disease is, however, unclear.