Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinicians' ratings of the state of oral tissues and their satisfaction with treatment to edentulous patients' ratings of treatment success after provision of mandibular implant overdentures or conventional dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects randomly received either mandibular overdentures retained by two implants (n = 30) or new conventional mandibular complete dentures (n = 30). All were given new conventional maxillary dentures. Baseline measures included clinical evaluation of the oral soft and hard tissues. Patients rated their general satisfaction before and after treatment, as well as their satisfaction with stability, speech, and esthetics on visual analogue scales. The treating prosthodontist rated the dentures for the same categories. Patient and clinician ratings were compared using correlations, t tests, and linear regression. RESULTS: None of the clinical variables were significantly correlated with patient satisfaction before or after treatment. The prosthodontist rated mandibular implant overdentures significantly better than conventional dentures regarding general satisfaction, stability, speech, and esthetics. Implant overdentures were also easier to fabricate (P < .0001). The prosthodontists' scores were not significantly correlated with patient scores for any question. CONCLUSION: Clinicians' assessments of the quality of denture-supporting tissues are poor predictors of patient satisfaction with mandibular implant or conventional prostheses. Prosthodontists and patients both rate mandibular implant overdentures as significantly superior to conventional dentures, but patients and clinicians do not usually agree when evaluating individual prostheses.     

Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures

Implant overdentures and conventional prostheses have been compared in several trials using a variety of functional and oral health-related quality of life (OHQOL) outcomes. In this paper, we describe the impact of implant overdentures on general and OHQOL in seniors. OBJECTIVES: To compare the oral health-related and general quality of life of seniors (aged 65-75 years) who received either mandibular implant overdentures or conventional dentures. METHODS: Sixty edentulous patients were recruited. Thirty received mandibular overdentures retained by two implants (IOD) and a conventional maxillary denture, the other 30 subjects received new maxillary and mandibular conventional complete dentures (CD). All completed the 20-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) before treatment, then at two and 6 months after delivery of the dentures. The SF-36 general health questionnaire was completed at baseline and 6 months only. RESULTS: Pretreatment and 6-month data from 55 subjects were analyzed. Those who received the IODs had significantly better OHIP-20 total scores at 6 months. Results for IOD subjects were also superior in the functional limitation, physical pain, physical disability and psychological disability subscales. While no significant between group difference was found on the SF-36 health survey, significant pre-post-treatment differences within the IOD group were detected for the role emotional, vitality and the social function scales. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants provide elderly patients with better OHQOL. General health-related quality of life improved in the implant group.     

Patient expectations of oral implant-retained prostheses in a UK dental hospital

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The loss of the natural dentition leads to severe functional impairment in many edentulous adults. A prosthesis retained and supported by osseointegrated dental implants may provide a satisfactory solution for people who have lost all their natural teeth. However, little information is available as to what patients requesting implants expect of implant-retained prostheses. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the expectations of a group of edentulous patients requesting implant therapy. METHOD: The study included two groups: (1) a group of edentulous adults who requested implant therapy ('implant group'); and (2) an edentulous control group, of similar age and gender distribution as the implant group, receiving conventional complete dentures. Following a clinical and radiographic examination of the patients, data were collected using validated questionnaires. Both groups made a subjective assessment of current dentures. The implant group also completed a questionnaire which assessed expectations of implant-retained prostheses. RESULTS: Baseline satisfaction with current dentures was low in both groups, with the implant group being significantly less satisfied with comfort and stability of their mandibular dentures. Perceived ability of the implant group to chew hard foods was less than the control group. The implant group's expectations of an implant-retained prosthesis were significantly greater than for a conventional denture. CONCLUSION: Careful assessment of patient expectation of implant therapy is essential to determine appropriate treatment need, and to highlight unrealistic expectations.     

Mandibular complete denture versus single‐implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient‐reported outcomes

The single‐implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative for edentulous patients who are poorly adapted to their dentures due to low retention and stability of the conventional mandibular complete denture (CD). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of SIMO, which can be measured by examining patient perception of treatment effects. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the comparative results of CD and SIMO treatments using patient‐reported outcome measures. A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The search included studies published up to July 2017. The focus question was: ‘Do single‐implant mandibular overdentures improve patient‐reported outcomes compared to conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients?’ Eligible studies were randomised clinical trials (RCT) and prospective studies. After initial screening for eligibility and full‐text analysis, 11 studies were included for data extraction and quality assessment (five parallel‐group RCTs, two crossover RCTs and four prospective studies). All studies reported marked improvement in satisfaction with the dentures and quality of life measures after SIMO treatment, irrespective of variations in implant treatment protocols and retention systems. Methodological considerations revealed a lack of evidence from RCTs on the comparative effectiveness of the two treatment strategies. Hence, although available evidence suggests considerable improvement in patient‐reported outcomes following the insertion of a single implant to retain a mandibular denture, further well‐designed comparative studies between SIMO and CD are required to improve the level of evidence and to support the indication of SIMO treatment in routine practice.     

Clinical outcome of removable prostheses supported by mini dental implants. A systematic review

Introduction: For many years, edentulous patients have had no other option than conventional dentures to reestablish their oral function. To avoid the need for bone graft surgery, some professionals have suggested the use of mini dental implants (MDIs) to support prostheses. The MDIs are narrow implants, ranging approximately from 1.8 to 2.9?mm in diameter. Recently, the promising results of mini implants regarding osseointegration and patient satisfaction have led clinicians to accept them as a definitive treatment option. Objective: Therefore, the proposition of this systematic review was to assess information on the outcomes of MDIs supporting removable prostheses. Methods:The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published before September 2017, which yielded a total of 774 studies for analysis. After exclusion and inclusion criteria, 22 prospective studies were included in this systematic review. Results: Most mini implants were placed in a flapless single-stage surgery and loaded immediately. Most studies reported failures in the first year and prosthetic complications. The mean survival rate of the selected studies was 95.6%, and mean follow-up was 22.8 months. Conclusion: The MDI-supported removable prostheses successfully improved patients’ chewing and speaking ability, quality of life, and satisfaction, suggesting that MDIs are a viable and safe option to support removable prostheses in the mandibular arch.     

Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers

The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre- and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre- and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30-50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.     

Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure

PURPOSE: The use of endosseous implants in the prosthetic restoration of edentulous patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) may provide improved outcomes when compared with traditional prosthetic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of placing endosseous implants in patients with RDEB and to compare the treatment outcomes of fixed and removable implant-supported restorations in the edentulous maxilla or mandible with the main emphasis on patient response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with RDEB were treated with implants. All patients were completely edentulous in either the maxilla or mandible and had marked oral involvement, with alterations in the soft and hard tissues in all cases. Three patients were treated with fixed, screw-retained implant-supported prostheses, and 3 were treated with removable implant-supported prostheses. Six months after prosthetic restoration, patients were given a questionnaire to assess their psychologic well-being and satisfaction with the implant-supported restoration marked on a visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 38 dental implants (21 maxillary, 17 mandibular) were placed in 6 patients. The implant success rate was 97.9%. The average follow-up from implant placement was 5.5 years (range, 1 to 9). The fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses were associated with improvements in comfort and retention, function, esthetics and appearance, taste, speech, and self-esteem. The level of satisfaction was slightly higher in patients with a fixed prosthesis. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that endosseous implants can be successfully placed and provide support for prostheses in patients with RDEB. Patients with fixed prostheses and overdentures were satisfied with their implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.     

The management of a completely edentulous patient using simultaneous maxillary and mandibular CAD/CAM-guided immediately loaded definitive implant-supported prostheses: a clinical report

Functional rehabilitation of a completely edentulous patient with removable prostheses is a clinical challenge. A patient with an edentulous maxilla and mandible received 6 endosseous implants in the maxilla and 5 implants in the mandible using CAD/CAM surgical templates. Definitive maxillary and mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dentures were connected immediately after implant placement using a CAD/CAM-guided implant surgical placement protocol.     

Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Implant overdenture treatment for the edentulous maxilla is challenging due to inherent anatomic and biomechanical problems. Moreover, controversy persists as to factors critical for implant and prosthetic success. Established criteria for design of the maxillary implant overdenture are lacking. PURPOSE: This article reviews the literature on maxillary implant overdentures with an emphasis on number, length, and distribution of implants, splinted or unsplinted anchorage systems, maintenance, and patient satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken seeking evidence to establish criteria for treatment considerations for implant overdenture treatment of the edentulous maxilla. A search of English language peer-reviewed literature was completed using Medline between the period of 1988 to 2006, focusing on evidence-based research. This was supplemented with a manual search of selected journals and textbooks. Randomized controlled clinical trials, nonrandomized controlled studies, longitudinal experimental clinical studies, longitudinal prospective studies, and longitudinal retrospective studies were favored in the review, using a general hierarchical classification. Articles that did not focus on or have an impact on implant overdenture treatment on the maxilla were excluded from the evaluation. The last search was conducted on December 31, 2006. Key terms included maxillary, dental implant, and overdenture. RESULTS: The literature demonstrates a limited number of randomized controlled trials and longitudinal prospective and retrospective studies to strongly support treatment consideration premises for the implant overdenture treatment of the edentulous maxilla. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this systematic review, treatment consideration recommendations have been posited given the available evidence. Better designed, longitudinal studies with higher power are required to establish definitive evidence-based treatment planning principles for the maxillary implant overdenture patient.     

Immediate implant loading: a case report

The therapeutic goal of implant dentistry is not merely tooth replacement but total oral rehabilitation. Considering dental implants as a treatment option can provide patients with positive, long-term results. Implants have developed into a viable alternative to conventional prosthetic reconstruction of edentulous areas. They provide excellent support for fixed or fixed detachable appliances, which increases function compared with conventional complete dentures. Implant dentistry has gone through many phases over the years. Modern technology and design allows us to predictably place our dental implants in immediate extraction sites and often load the implants at the time of placement. Single tooth-by-tooth reconstruction provides easy access for the patient to floss and clean the areas compared with the relative difficulty in maintenance when crowns are splinted. This case study demonstrates full maxillary and partial mandibular reconstruction using dental implants. The implants were surgically placed immediately after extractions and loaded using a stable roundhouse composite temporary bridge. Following osseointegration, the implants were permanently restored with individual crowns.     

Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery

PURPOSE: This study examined patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures and mandibular implant overdentures opposing conventional maxillary dentures 6 months after delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty edentulous subjects (aged 65 to 75 years) were randomly assigned to either a mandibular conventional denture or an overdenture supported by two implants with ball-shaped retentive anchors. Patients rated their general satisfaction and other features of their prostheses, together with their ability to eat certain food items, on 100-mm visual analogue scales before assignment, and after 2 and 6 months. RESULTS: Both treatment groups reported greater satisfaction with their new prostheses at 6 months. General satisfaction ratings were higher in the implant group than in the conventional denture group by approximately 36% (mean difference 22.3 mm). The implant group also rated comfort (mean difference 22.4 mm), stability (mean difference 28.5 mm), and ability to chew (mean difference 17.3 mm) significantly higher. Significantly higher scores were also given by the implant group for their ability to chew certain hard foods. A trend for an increase in the differences between the groups, in favor of the implant group, was observed between the 2- and 6-month recalls, although the increase was only significant for ease of cleaning. The primary influence on general satisfaction 6 months after the delivery of the prostheses was the provision of the two-implant overdenture. CONCLUSION: Edentulous seniors who received mandibular implant overdentures opposing a conventional denture rated their general satisfaction approximately 36% higher than did a comparable group provided with new conventional dentures.     

Outcome of treatment with implant-retained dental prostheses in patients with Sj?gren syndrome.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the outcome of treatment with implant-retained prostheses in patients suffering from Sj?gren syndrome. Eight women were included in the study; all had suffered oral symptoms of Sj?gren syndrome for many years. Seven patients were edentulous in both arches, and 1 patient was edentulous in the maxilla only. All patients reported poor or very poor comfort levels with their conventional dentures. It was the intention to treat each arch that showed subjective and objective denture problems with a complete fixed prosthesis after placement of 6 implants. In all, 54 Br?nemark dental implants were placed in these patients. No implants were lost, but 7 implants in 4 patients were clinically not osseointegrated at the time of the abutment connection procedure. Because of nonosseointegrated implants and lack of jawbone, 3 arches were treated with an implant-retained overdenture. Fixed prostheses were made with a titanium framework of premachined components welded together (Procera) and acrylic resin teeth and flanges. Patients answered a questionnaire regarding their oral function before the onset of treatment and 1 month and 2 years after treatment. An average radiographic bone loss of 0.7 mm from the time of implant placement to 1 year after treatment was observed; additional bone loss of less than 0.6 mm was recorded 4 years after treatment. During the first year of function 2 implants lost osseointegration. No prostheses were lost or remade. Treatment with implant-retained prostheses considerably increased the prosthetic comfort and function of the patients. Two years after prosthetic treatment, only 1 patient indicated poor comfort of the prostheses, while the remaining patients reported good or very good comfort levels.     

Implants in conjunction with removable partial dentures: a literature review

Although the benefits of implant-borne removable prostheses are readily apparent for the fully edentulous patient and have been well documented, there is a paucity of studies concerning the combination of implants with removable partial dentures in partially edentulous patients. The aim of this article is to review the literature regarding implants with removable partial dentures and evaluate the evidence for this clinical approach. A MEDLINE/PubMed search from 1990 to 2006, focusing on the use of implants with removable partial dentures and related features, was supplemented with a hand search to identify relevant peer-reviewed English articles published in dental journals and textbooks on removable partial dentures.     

Use of mini implants for replacement and immediate loading of 2 single-tooth restorations: a clinical case report

Numerous long-term studies have shown that treatment with dental implants can provide edentulous patients with a more stable alternative to complete dentures and partially edentulous patients with a more conservative form of tooth replacement than conventional fixed partial dentures. Until recently, commercially available dental implants have been limited to diameters ranging from 3.0 mm to 7.0 mm. Although this range of diameters has been able to address most clinical needs, partially edentulous patients who could not accommodate a 3.0-mm-diameter implant without damaging adjacent dental structures were excluded from implant therapy. This article reports on the surgical treatment and immediate restoration of a patient who received mini implants that were 2.4 mm in diameter.     

The effectiveness of 2‐implant overdentures – a pragmatic international multicentre study

Summary The purpose of this multicentre observational study was to determine patient satisfaction with either conventional dentures or mandibular 2‐implant overdentures in a ‘real world’ setting. Two hundred and three edentulous patients (mean age 68·8 ± 10·4 years) were recruited at eight centres located in North America, South America and Europe. The patients were provided with new mandibular conventional dentures or implant overdentures supported by two implants and ball attachments. At baseline and at 6 months post‐treatment, they rated their satisfaction with their mandibular prostheses on 100‐mm visual analogue scale questionnaires. One hundred and two (50·2%) participants had valid baseline and 6‐month satisfaction data. Although both groups reported improvements, the implant overdenture group reported significantly higher ratings of overall satisfaction, comfort, stability, ability to speak and ability to chew. These results suggest that edentulous patients who choose mandibular implant overdentures have significantly greater improvements in satisfaction, despite their relatively higher cost, than those who choose new conventional dentures.     

Efficiency of immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations

Background: The concept of immediately loading dental implants in fully edentulous patients offers patients many benefits, including the ability to eat post placement and improved comfort during healing. This approach may also minimize the number of patient visits when compared with the traditional approach of implant placement and healing over a 3‐ to 4‐month healing period. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the number of treatment visits for patients undergoing traditional implant placement and healing with that of patients receiving immediate implant loading prior to construction of the definitive prostheses. Materials and Methods: This case series evaluated two patient groups. Group 1 consisted of seven patients who were edentulous in the mandible. After implant placement, the implants were covered by oral mucosa during 3 to 4 months of healing. During this time patients wore relined mandibular dentures. Group 2 consisted of seven patients who had their implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses on the day of implant placement. Results: The implants in both groups were integrated successfully; however, the number of patient visits between implant placement and construction of the definitive prostheses was 38 in the conventionally loaded group and 1 in the immediately loaded group. Conclusions: The group with immediate loading required significantly fewer postoperative visits compared with the conventionally loaded group.     

Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review

Summary The aim of this article is to investigate patient satisfaction, survival rate of implants, and prosthetic complications or maintenance for rehabilitation with removable partial dentures associated with implants in mandibular Kennedy class I and II cases. A systematic literature review was conducted by three independent reviewers including articles published from January 1981 through September 2011. Medline and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used in addition to hand searching to assess clinical outcomes for mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension. This review yielded 1751 records that were narrowed down to 5. The studies revealed implant survival rates ranging from 95% to 100% with one failure reported of 98 implants. The removable partial dentures associated with implant in mandibular free-end arches showed some complications and need of repair for relining, pitting of the healing abutment, replacement of resilient component of the attachment, damage in framework, screw loosening and damage in acrylic denture base. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through a five-point questionnaire, and results ranged between 4·12 and 5·0, considering 1 as the least favourable situation. The literature review showed increase in patient satisfaction and high survival rates of implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures with distal extensions. However, some complications and need of prosthetic repair were reported. Although this treatment approach could represent a low-cost and beneficial rehabilitation for free-end mandibular ridges, the lack of controlled and randomised well-designed clinical trials suggests further studies with more representative samples to validate the outcomes of this treatment modality.     

Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: report of 27 patients from a private practice.

Numerous authors have documented clinical success in loading threaded implants at the time of implant placement when carefully controlled surgical and restorative protocols are followed. This clinical series documents the application of immediate loading techniques to fixed mandibular restorations in 27 patients who were edentulous or had non-restorable mandibular dentitions. Eighteen patients had complete conventional maxillary dentures, while 9 had natural or fixed prosthetic maxillary dentitions. Twelve different restorative dentists provided prosthetic support for these patients and used 4 different restoration types: laboratory- or office-processed, with cement or screw retention. Five to 8 threaded implants were placed in each patient. One hundred sixty-one of the 186 implants that were placed by the authors were loaded immediately using fixed provisional restorations of the various designs. More than 99% (160/161) of the immediately loaded implants and 99.5% (185/186) of all implants were clinically integrated and radiographically successful at the time of final evaluation for restoration fabrication. After final implant evaluation, no additional implant losses occurred, indicating an implant survival rate of nearly 100% over a mean of 25.0 months (range 13 to 41 months) following implant placement. While a strong preference for cement-retained restorations was apparent, all prostheses showed similar success. The data and the experience described in this report indicate that immediate loading with fixed restorations using appropriate surgical and restorative techniques can be a predictable technique for rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible.     

Implant‐Retained Removable Partial Dentures: An 8‐Year Retrospective Study

Purpose: To evaluate the long‐term outcomes of removable partial dentures (RPDs) retained (but not supported) by dental implants. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 32 consecutive patients who received implant‐retained RPDs. Each patient received one to four endosseus implants; the sample included a total of 64 implants. Follow‐up was conducted for a minimum of 8 years, during which satisfaction, implant survival, and prosthetic success were evaluated. Results: Patient satisfaction systematically increased. The implant success rate was 93.75%, and 100% of the prostheses were successful. Conclusion: Implant‐retained RPDs are a reliable intermediate solution that can reduce biological and economic costs while maintaining implant treatment benefits and the ease of RPD procedures.