PET及PET-CT在监测肿瘤治疗效果中的价值

18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET和PET-CT既能准确鉴别肿瘤残留与纤维化,又能通过定量评价治疗前后18F-FDG摄取的变化来早期预测疗效和评价预后,指导临床及时调整治疗方案,因此越来越多地被用于监测肿瘤放化疗疗效。目前已建立了一些应用PET和PET-CT监测肿瘤疗效的具体方法,研究结果显示,PET及PET-CT在监测肿瘤疗效方面存在明显的优势,但也存在问题。     

Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors

PET imaging with the glucose analog fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has been evaluated in numerous studies to monitor tumor response in patients undergoing chemo- and radiotherapy. The clinical value of FDG-PET for differentiation of residual or recurrent viable tumor and therapy-induced fibrosis or scar tissue has been documented for various solid tumors. Furthermore, there are now several reports suggesting that quantitative assessment of therapy-induced changes in tumor FDG uptake may allow prediction of tumor response and patient outcome very early in the course of therapy. In nonresponding patients, treatment may be adjusted according to the individual chemo- and radiosensitivity of the tumor tissue. Since the number of alternative treatments for solid tumors (e.g., second-line chemotherapy agents, protein kinase, or angiogenesis inhibitors) is continuously increasing, early prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy by FDG-PET has enormous potential to "personalize" treatment and to reduce the side-effects and costs of ineffective therapy.     

PET in the assessment of therapy response in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus.

In patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus, metabolic and functional imaging by PET with (18)F-FDG has a pivotal role in the evaluation of tumor response to therapy, specifically, in the prediction of progression-free survival and overall survival. Metabolic imaging allows the detection of biochemical changes within tumor cells as opposed to identifiable morphologic changes. Anatomic imaging modalities do not reliably differentiate between responders and nonresponders early during the course of follow-up. The correlation between histopathologic tumor response after preoperative therapy and clinical prognosis is well established for many cancers. Squamous carcinoma of the head and neck and esophageal carcinoma demonstrate avid (18)F-FDG uptake. For these cancers, (18)F-FDG PET parallels histopathologic findings in its ability to detect residual viable tumor; therefore, it is a valuable tool for the noninvasive assessment of histopathologic tumor response in advanced-stage cases after neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. Early determination of nonresponders is of prime importance, as timely therapy modification can be accomplished for patients who do not demonstrate a response to therapy. This determination is exceptionally important for head and neck and esophageal malignancies, both of which are known for their unfavorable prognosis, as early modifications in therapy regimens for nonresponders may improve patient outcome. There is now evidence that (18)F-FDG PET is a sensitive and specific method for determining therapy response and for providing important prognostic information for these cancers. Therefore, (18)F-FDG PET may change patient management and lead to improved survival for a selected group of patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus.     

Early prediction of response to chemotherapy and survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma using a novel semiautomated 3-dimensional volume-based analysis of serial 18F-FDG PET scans.

The aim of chemotherapy for mesothelioma is to palliate symptoms and improve survival. Measuring response using CT is challenging because of the circumferential tumor growth pattern. This study aims to evaluate the role of serial (18)F-FDG PET in the assessment of response to chemotherapy in patients with mesothelioma. METHODS: Patients were prospectively recruited and underwent both (18)F-FDG PET and conventional radiological response assessment before and after 1 cycle of chemotherapy. Quantitative volume-based (18)F-FDG PET analysis was performed to obtain the total glycolytic volume (TGV) of the tumor. Survival outcomes were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were suitable for both radiological and (18)F-FDG PET analysis, of whom 20 had CT measurable disease. After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, 7 patients attained a partial response and 13 had stable disease on CT assessment by modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. In the 7 patients with radiological partial response, the median TGV on quantitative PET analysis fell to 30% of baseline (range, 11%-71%). After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, Cox regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between a fall in TGV and improved patient survival (P = 0.015). Neither a reduction in the maximum standardized uptake value (P = 0.097) nor CT (P = 0.131) demonstrated a statistically significant association with patient survival. CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative (18)F-FDG PET using the volume-based parameter of TGV is feasible in mesothelioma and may predict response to chemotherapy and patient survival after 1 cycle of treatment. Therefore, metabolic imaging has the potential to improve the care of patients receiving chemotherapy for mesothelioma by the early identification of responding patients. This technology may also be useful in the assessment of new systemic treatments for mesothelioma.     

The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are gaining the interest of researchers because of impressive metabolic response to the targeted molecular therapeutic drug imatinib mesylate. Initial reports suggest an impressive role for (18)F-FDG PET in follow-up of therapy for these tumors. However, the role of (18)F-FDG PET versus that of CT has not been established. Therefore, we compared the roles of (18)F-FDG PET and CT in staging and evaluation of early response to imatinib mesylate therapy in recurrent or metastatic GIST. METHODS: The study included 54 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans within 3 wk before initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. Forty-nine of these patients underwent repeat scans 2 mo after therapy. The numbers of sites or organs containing lesions on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans were compared. Corresponding lesions on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans or those confirmed to be malignant in appearance by other imaging modalities or on follow-up were considered true positives. Lesions seen on (18)F-FDG PET or CT scans but not seen or confirmed to be of benign appearance with other imaging modalities or on follow-up were considered false positives. Measurements of the maximum standard uptake value (SUV) on (18)F-FDG PET scans and tumor size on CT scans were used for quantitative evaluation of early tumor response to therapy. RESULTS: A total of 122 and 114 sites and/or organs were involved on pretherapy (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) for CT were 93% and 100%; whereas these values for (18)F-FDG PET were 86% and 98%. However, the differences between these values for CT and (18)F-FDG PET were not statistically significant (P = 0.27 for sensitivity and 0.25 for PPV). This suggests comparable performance of (18)F-FDG PET and CT in staging GISTs. Repeat scans at 2 mo after therapy showed agreement between (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans in 71.4% of patients (57.1% having a good response to therapy and 14.3% lacking a response). Discrepant results between (18)F-FDG PET and CT were recorded for 28.6% of the patients. (18)F-FDG PET predicted response to therapy earlier than did CT in 22.5% of patients during a longer follow-up interval (4-16 mo), whereas CT predicted lack of response to therapy earlier than (18)F-FDG PET in 4.1%. One patient did not undergo long-term follow-up. These findings suggest that (18)F-FDG PET is superior to CT in predicting early response to therapy in recurrent or metastatic GIST patients. CONCLUSION: The performances of (18)F-FDG PET and CT are comparable in staging GISTs before initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. However, (18)F-FDG PET is superior to CT in predicting early response to therapy. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET is a better guide for imatinib mesylate therapy.     

18F-FET PET compared with 18F-FDG PET and CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Recent studies suggest a somewhat selective uptake of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in cerebral gliomas and in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and a good distinction between tumor and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of 18F-FET PET in patients with SCC of the head and neck region by comparing that tracer with 18F-FDG PET and CT. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with suspected head and neck tumors underwent 18F-FET PET, 18F-FDG PET, and CT within 1 wk before operation. After coregistration, the images were evaluated by 3 independent observers and an ROC analysis was performed, with the histopathologic result used as a reference. Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) in the lesions were determined. RESULTS: In 18 of 21 patients, histologic examination revealed SCC, and in 2 of these patients, a second SCC tumor was found at a different anatomic site. In 3 of 21 patients, inflammatory tissue and no tumor were identified. Eighteen of 20 SCC tumors were positive for both 18F-FDG uptake and 18F-FET uptake, one 0.3-cm SCC tumor was detected neither with 18F-FDG PET nor with 18F-FET PET, and one 0.7-cm SCC tumor in a 4.3-cm ulcer was overestimated as a 4-cm tumor on 18F-FDG PET and missed on 18F-FET PET. Inflammatory tissue was positive for 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 3.7-4.7) but negative for 18F-FET uptake (SUV, 1.3-1.6). The SUVs of 18F-FDG in SCC were significantly higher (13.0 +/- 9.3) than those of 18F-FET (4.4 +/- 2.2). The ROC analysis showed significantly superior detection of SCC with (18)F-FET PET or 18F-FDG PET than with CT. No significant difference (P = 0.71) was found between 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET was 93%, specificity was 79%, and accuracy was 83%. 18F-FET PET yielded a lower sensitivity of 75% but a substantially higher specificity of 95% (accuracy, 90%). CONCLUSION: 18F-FET may not replace 18F-FDG in the PET diagnostics of head and neck cancer but may be a helpful additional tool in selected patients, because 18F-FET PET might better differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue. The sensitivity of 18F-FET PET in SCC, however, was inferior to that of 18F-FDG PET because of lower SUVs.     

Evaluation of therapy for lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is the best noninvasive imaging technique for to assess response in patients suffering from lymphoma. Early response evaluation ("interim PET") after one, a few cycles, or at midtreatment can predict response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We calculated from data of 7 studies an overall sensitivity to predict treatment failure of 79%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%, and an accuracy of 85%. Although it is not yet indicated to change patient management based on residual (18)F-FDG uptake on interim scan in chemotherapy-sensitive patients, prospective studies evaluating the role of an interim PET in patient management clearly are warranted. (18)F-FDG PET also has an important prognostic role in relapsing patients after reinduction chemotherapy before high-dose chemotherapy (HCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, all chemotherapy-sensitive patients remain candidates for HCT followed by ASCT, even if (18)F-FDG PET showed residual (18)F-FDG uptake. We calculated from data of 3 studies an overestimated risk of relapse in 16% of all PET-positive patients. Some patients with residual (18)F-FDG uptake will have a good outcome after HCT followed by ASCT. (18)F-FDG PET is the imaging technique of choice for end-of-treatment evaluation. However, (18)F-FDG is not specific for tumoral tissue. Active inflammatory lesions and infectious processes can be falsely interpreted as malignant residual cells. However, a negative (18)F-FDG PET cannot exclude minimal residual disease. Consequently, it is always indicated to correlate PET findings with clinical data, other imaging modalities, and/or a biopsy. We calculated, from data of 17 studies in end-of-treatment evaluation, a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 94%, a PPV of 82%, a NPV 92%, and an accuracy of 89%.     

Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET.

This study was designed to compare the value of PET using (11)C-choline with that of PET using (18)F-FDG for the diagnosis of gynecologic tumors. METHODS: We examined 21 patients, including 18 patients with untreated primary tumors and 3 patients with suspected recurrence of ovarian cancer. (11)C-choline PET and (18)F-FDG PET were performed within 2 wk of each other on each patient. The patients fasted for at least 5 h before the PET examinations, and PET was performed 5 min ((11)C-choline) and 60 min ((18)F-FDG) after injection of each tracer. PET images were corrected for the transmission data, and the reconstructed images were visually analyzed. Then, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated for quantitative assessment of tumor uptake. PET results were compared with surgical histology or >6 mo of clinical observations. RESULTS: Of 18 untreated patients, (11)C-choline PET correctly detected primary tumors in 16 patients, whereas (18)F-FDG PET detected them in 14 patients. In 1 patient with small uterine cervical cancer and 1 diabetic patient with uterine corpus cancer, only (11)C-choline PET was true-positive. Both tracers were false-negative for atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium in 1 patient and were false-positive for pelvic inflammatory disease in 1 patient. For the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 3), (11)C-choline PET and (18)F-FDG PET were true-positive in 1 patient, whereas neither tracer could detect cystic recurrent tumor and microscopic peritoneal disease in the other 2 patients. In the 15 patients with true-positive results for both tracers, tumor SUVs were significantly higher for (18)F-FDG than for (11)C-choline (9.14 +/- 3.78 vs. 4.61 +/- 1.61, P < 0.0001). In 2 patients with uterine cervical cancer, parailiac lymph node metastases were clearly visible on (18)F-FDG PET but were obscured by physiologic bowel uptake on (11)C-choline PET. CONCLUSION: The use of (11)C-choline PET is feasible for imaging of gynecologic tumors. Unlike (18)F-FDG PET, interpretation of the primary tumor on (11)C-choline PET is not hampered by urinary radioactivity; however, variable background activity in the intestine may interfere with the interpretation.     

18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma.

PET is a unique form of diagnostic imaging that observes in vivo biologic changes using radiopharmaceuticals that closely mimic endogenous molecules. (18)F-FDG, which allows the evaluation of glucose metabolism, is the most commonly used tracer in oncology because of the practical half-life of (18)F (110 min), compared with other short-lived positron emitters. (18)F-FDG uptake in tumors is proportional to the glycolytic metabolic rate of viable tumor cells indicating the increased metabolic demand of tumors for glucose. (18)F-FDG PET significantly improves the accuracy of imaging tumors in initial staging, management of recurrent cancer, and monitoring of therapy response. The information provided by this technique is more sensitive and specific than that provided by anatomic imaging modalities. (18)F-FDG PET is particularly superior to CT or MRI in the ability to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment regimens early during therapy or after therapy. In this review, we discuss the role of (18)F-FDG PET in evaluating the response to therapy and the impact of this information on patient management.     

Morphologic and functional changes in nontumorous liver tissue after radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo model: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, ultrasound, and CT.

Rimlike contrast enhancement on morphologic imaging and increased tracer uptake on (18)F-FDG PET in the periphery of the necrosis can hamper differentiation of residual tumor from regenerative tissue after radiofrequency ablation of liver lesions. This study used MRI, CT, ultrasound, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT to assess the typical appearance of lesions in nontumorous animal liver tissue after radiofrequency ablation. METHODS: Lesions were created by radiofrequency ablation of normal liver parenchyma in 21 minipigs. Follow-up was performed by 3 contrast-enhanced morphologic modalities-MRI, CT, and ultrasound-and by (18)F-FDG PET/CT immediately, 3 and 10 d, and 1, 2, 3, and 6 mo after radiofrequency ablation. Images were evaluated qualitatively for areas of increased enhancement and regions of elevated tracer uptake. Furthermore, all images were assessed quantitatively by determination of ratios comparing enhancement/tracer uptake in the periphery of the necrosis with enhancement/tracer uptake in normal liver parenchyma. Imaging findings were compared with histopathology findings. RESULTS: Immediately after radiofrequency ablation, no increase in (18)F-FDG uptake was visible, whereas elevated enhancement was noticed in the periphery of the necrosis on all morphologic imaging procedures. At further follow-up, an area of rimlike increase in (18)F-FDG uptake surrounding the necrosis was detected on PET/CT. The rimlike pattern of increased enhancement in the arterial phase was present for all liver lesions on CT, MRI, and ultrasound, especially between day 3 and month 1 after the radiofrequency ablation. Both elevated glucose metabolism and enhancement persisted for 6 mo postinterventionally. Histologic examination showed a hemorrhagic border converting into a regeneration capsule. CONCLUSION: If performed immediately after radiofrequency ablation, (18)F-FDG PET/CT probably has benefits over those of morphologic imaging procedures when assessing liver tissue for residual tumor. Later follow-up may be hampered by visualization of peripheral hyperperfusion and tissue regeneration. Further studies on a patient population are essential.     

Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice.

Small-animal PET scanning with (18)F-FDG is increasingly used in murine models of human diseases. However, the impact of dietary conditions, mode of anesthesia, and ambient temperature on the biodistribution of (18)F-FDG in mice has not been systematically studied so far. The aim of this study was to determine how these factors affect assessment of tumor glucose use by (18)F-FDG PET and to develop an imaging protocol that optimizes visualization of tumor xenografts. METHODS: Groups of severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice were first imaged by microPET with free access to food, at room temperature (20 degrees C), and no anesthesia during the uptake period (reference condition). Subsequently, the impact of (a) fasting for 8-12 h, (b) warming the animals with a heating pad (30 degrees C), and (c) general anesthesia using isoflurane or ketamine/xylazine on the (18)F-FDG biodistribution was evaluated. Subcutaneously implanted human A431 epidermoid carcinoma and U251 glioblastoma cells served as tumor models. RESULTS: Depending on the study conditions, (18)F-FDG uptake by normal tissues varied 3-fold for skeletal muscle, 13-fold for brown adipose tissue, and 15-fold for myocardium. Warming and fasting significantly reduced the intense (18)F-FDG uptake by brown adipose tissue observed under the reference condition and markedly improved visualization of tumor xenografts. Although tumor (18)F-FDG uptake was not above background activity under the reference condition, tumors demonstrated marked focal (18)F-FDG uptake in warmed and fasted animals. Quantitatively, tumor (18)F-FDG uptake increased 4-fold and tumor-to-organ ratios were increased up to 17-fold. Ketamine/xylazine anesthesia caused marked hyperglycemia and was not further evaluated. Isoflurane anesthesia only mildly increased blood glucose levels and had no significant effect on tumor (18)F-FDG uptake. Isoflurane markedly reduced (18)F-FDG uptake by brown adipose tissue and skeletal muscle but increased the activity concentration in liver, myocardium, and kidney. CONCLUSION: Animal handling has a dramatic effect on (18)F-FDG biodistribution and significantly influences the results of microPET studies in tumor-bearing mice. To improve tumor visualization mice should be fasted and warmed before (18)F-FDG injection and during the uptake period. Isoflurane appears well suited for anesthesia of tumor-bearing mice, whereas ketamine/xylazine should be used with caution, as it may induce marked hyperglycemia.     

Early response to treatment with Glivec detected with 18F-FDG PET in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

We present the case of a male patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in whom we conducted two (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) studies, the first one prior to beginning the treatment with Glivec and the second after one month of treatment. The first (18)F-FDG PET scan detected multiple FDG avid foci in distal esophagus, liver and in an interaortocava lymph node. The second (18)F-FDG PET showed very good response to therapy, with an almost complete disease remission. After 23 months of follow-up, the early response to treatment detected by (18)F-FDG PET was confirmed. The utility of (18)F-FDG PET in the evaluation of response to treatment in GIST is discussed and compared with CT.     

Findings on 18F-FDG PET scans after neoadjuvant chemoradiation provides prognostic stratification in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma subsequently treated by radical surgery.

Predicting outcome after aggressive therapy for advanced rectal cancer remains difficult. (18)F-FDG PET has emerged as a valid method for predicting patient outcomes after therapy in an increasing number of cancers. We evaluated the prognostic information obtained from the degree of change in tumor (18)F-FDG PET uptake induced by chemoradiation before radical curative surgery in patients with T3/T4 rectal cancer. METHODS: The study included 34 consecutive patients with T3/T4 Nx M0 rectal cancer on structural imaging, who underwent staging and postchemoradiation (18)F-FDG PET before planned curative surgery. Change in (18)F-FDG uptake was graded visually as complete (CMR), partial (PMR), or no (NoMR) metabolic response. Pre- and postchemoradiation (18)F-FDG PET-derived standardized uptake values (SUVs) were then obtained for PMR patients to determine whether SUV further stratified this subgroup. Operative findings were available in 30 patients (3 excluded because of (18)F-FDG PET-defined M1 disease, 1 refused surgery). Clinical status at study closeout (alive free from disease, FFD; alive with disease, AWD; or died of disease, DOD) was available for all patients. RESULTS: A pathologic complete response was found in only 6 of 30 patients (5 CMR, 1 false-positive PMR). However, after an estimated median 3.1 y of follow-up, all 17 CMR patients were FFD, 6 of 10 PMR patients were FFD, 2 of 10 had DOD, and 2 of 10 were AWD. All 3 NoMR patients DOD. PET response was highly significantly associated with overall survival duration (P < 0.0001) and time to progression (P < 0.0001). Pathologic complete response was the only other statistically significant prognostic factor (P < 0.03). The percentage of maximum SUV change after chemoradiation was not predictive of survival in PMR patients. CONCLUSION: Using a simple qualitative assessment, postchemoradiation (18)F-FDG PET scintigraphy provides good medium-term prognostic information in patients with advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical surgery with curative intent.     

Need for standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments

Many factors affect standardized uptake values (SUVs) in (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The use of the SUV from a single PET scan in multicenter studies requires the standardization of (18)F-FDG PET/CT procedures. In the context of treatment response assessments (repeated PET scans), many factors may seem to have minor effects on percentage changes in SUVs, provided that imaging procedures are executed in a consistent manner for each subject. However, the use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in a nonstandardized manner will result in unknown biases and reproducibilities of SUVs and SUV-based response measures. This article provides an overview of the need for standardization in relation to the specific use of SUVs and SUV changes in studies of treatment response assessments.     

Tumor localization of 16beta-18F-fluoro-5alpha-dihydrotestosterone versus 18F-FDG in patients with progressive, metastatic prostate cancer.

This trial was an initial assessment of the feasibility, in vivo targeting, and biokinetics of 16beta-(18)F-fluoro-5alpha-dihydrotestosterone ((18)F-FDHT) PET in patients with metastatic prostate cancer to assess androgen receptor expression. METHODS: Seven patients with progressive clinically metastatic prostate cancer underwent (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FDHT PET scans in addition to conventional imaging methods. Three patients had their studies repeated 1 mo later, 2 while on testosterone therapy, and the third after treatment with 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG). High-pressure liquid radiochromatography was used to separate (18)F-FDHT from radiolabeled metabolites. Lesion-by-lesion comparisons between the (18)F-FDHT, (18)F-FDG, and conventional imaging methods were performed. RESULTS: Metabolism of (18)F-FDHT was rapid, with 80% conversion within 10 min to radiolabeled metabolites that circulated bound to plasma proteins. Tumor uptake was rapid and tumor retention was prolonged. Fifty-nine lesions were identified by conventional imaging methods. (18)F-FDG PET was positive in 57 of 59 lesions (97%), with an average lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) = 5.22. (18)F-FDHT PET was positive in 46 of 59 lesions (78%), with the average positive lesion SUV(max) = 5.28. Treatment with testosterone resulted in diminished (18)F-FDHT uptake at the tumor site. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDHT localizes to tumor sites in patients with progressive clinically metastatic prostate cancer and may be a promising agent to analyze antigen receptors and their impact on the clinical management of prostate cancer.     

Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

PET and (18)F-FDG have the potential to follow the early metabolic response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and to predict success or failure of the therapy. METHODS: We studied 16 patients with non-small cell lung cancer as they followed 2 courses of docetaxel and carboplatin. Each patient was studied weekly for 7 wk, and tissue activity was assessed by the amount of radioactivity retained 90 min after the intravenous injection of (18)F-FDG. In a prospective analysis, the linear least-squares method was used to evaluate the time course of metabolic activity in tumor and liver, bone marrow, and unaffected lung tissues; a metabolic response was defined as a response in which the slope of the regression was negative and significantly different from zero. Our hypothesis was that patients who exhibited a tumor metabolic response would survive longer than those who did not. In a retrospective examination of our data, we grouped our patients into those who survived <6 mo and those who survived longer and calculated the difference in the standardized uptake value (SUV) between day 7 and subsequent time points to determine the most appropriate timing of 2 PET studies in predicting response to therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen of 16 patients completed the study. In the prospective study, 8 patients were classified as nonresponders as the slope of the regression of tumor SUV versus time was not different from zero; they all died within 35 wk of the end of their study. Seven patients were classified as responders; 5 survived and 2 died, one at 25 wk and the other at 76 wk. In the retrospective study, a decrease of 0.5 SUV between studies performed at 1 and 3 wk after the initiation of chemotherapy was predictive of those patients who survived >6 mo and in whom chemotherapy was presumably successful. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had a positive outcome, as exhibited by prolonged survival, were those who showed a tumor metabolic response assessed using weekly (18)F-FDG PET studies. (18)F-FDG PET studies performed at 1 and 3 wk after the initiation of chemotherapy allowed prediction of the response to therapy.     

Effects of pegfilgrastim on normal biodistribution of 18F-FDG: preclinical and clinical studies.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, on the normal biodistribution of (18)F-FDG in an animal model and in humans. METHODS: Two groups of 12 rats received a single subcutaneous injection of either normal saline or pegfilgrastim. One, 7, 14, and 21 d after injection, biodistribution studies were performed 1 h after (18)F-FDG injection. Sixteen breast cancer patients underwent baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT and, approximately 1 wk after receiving 1 dose of docetaxel and adjunctive pegfilgrastim, follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT (scan 2). Standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL) were determined for several normal organs before and after therapy. RESULTS: In rats, bone marrow (18)F-FDG uptake (standardized uptake value) was higher in the pegfilgrastim group 1 d after injection (mean +/- SD, 8.3 +/- 4.1 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.2, P < 0.05), whereas (18)F-FDG uptake in blood was lower (0.41 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.01, P < 0.05). In patients, mean SUL was higher in bone marrow (4.49 +/- 1.50 vs. 1.33 +/- 0.22, P < 0.0001), spleen (3.29 +/- 0.83 vs. 1.23 +/- 0.23, P < 0.0001), and liver (1.45 +/- 0.25 vs. 1.31 +/- 0.23, P = 0.01) but lower in brain (4.18 +/- 0.76 vs. 5.14 +/- 1.44, P < 0.01) on scan 2 than on the baseline scan. CONCLUSION: In both the animal model and humans, pegfilgrastim markedly increased bone marrow uptake of (18)F-FDG and reduced (18)F-FDG uptake in some normal tissues. These profound alterations in (18)F-FDG biodistribution induced by pegfilgrastim must be considered when one is evaluating quantitative (18)F-FDG PET scans for tumor response to therapy.     

Gene expression patterns and tumor uptake of 18F-FDG, 18F-FLT, and 18F-FEC in PET/MRI of an orthotopic mouse xenotransplantation model of pancreatic cancer

Our aim was to use PET/MRI to evaluate and compare the uptake of 18F-FDG, 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT), and 18F-fluorethylcholine (18F-FEC) in human pancreatic tumor cell lines after xenotransplantation into SCID mice and to correlate tumor uptake with gene expression of membrane transporters and rate-limiting enzymes for tracer uptake and tracer retention. METHODS: Four weeks after orthotopic inoculation of human pancreatic carcinoma cells (PancTuI, Colo357, and BxPC3) into SCID mice, combined imaging was performed with a small-animal PET scanner and a 3-T MRI scanner using a dedicated mouse coil. Tumor-to-liver uptake ratios (TLRs) of the tracers were compared with gene expression profiles of the tumor cell lines and both normal pancreatic tissue and pancreatic tumor tissue based on gene microarray analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: 18F-FLT showed the highest tumor uptake, with a mean TLR of 2.3, allowing correct visualization of all 12 pancreatic tumors. 18F-FDG detected only 4 of 8 tumors and had low uptake in tumors, with a mean TLR of 1.1 in visible tumors. 18F-FEC did not show any tumor uptake. Gene array analysis revealed that both hexokinase 1 as the rate-limiting enzyme for 18F-FDG trapping and pancreas-specific glucose transporter 2 were significantly downregulated whereas thymidine kinase 1, responsible for 18F-FLT trapping, was significantly upregulated in the tumor cell lines, compared with normal pancreatic duct cells and pancreatic tumor tissue. Relevant genes involved in the uptake of 18F-FEC were predominantly unaffected or downregulated in the tumor cell lines. CONCLUSION: In comparison to 18F-FDG and 18F-FEC, 18F-FLT was the PET tracer with the highest and most consistent uptake in various human pancreatic tumor cell lines in SCID mice. The imaging results could be explained by gene expression patterns of membrane transporters and enzymes for tracer uptake and retention as measured by gene array analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the respective cell lines. Thus, standard molecular techniques provided the basis to help explain model-specific tracer uptake patterns in xenotransplanted human tumor cell lines in mice as observed by PET.     

Early tumor response to Hsp90 therapy using HER2 PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

We compared (68)Ga-DOTA-F(ab')(2)-herceptin (DOTA is 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N',N'-tetraacetic acid [HER2 PET]) and (18)F-FDG PET for imaging of tumor response to the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG). METHODS: Mice bearing BT474 breast tumor xenografts were scanned with (18)F-FDG PET and HER2 PET before and after 17AAG treatment and then biweekly for up to 3 wk. RESULTS: Within 24 h after treatment, a significant decrease in HER2 was measured by HER2 PET, whereas (18)F-FDG PET uptake, a measure of glycolysis, was unchanged. Marked growth inhibition occurred in treated tumors but became evident only by 11 d after treatment. Thus, Her2 downregulation occurs independently of changes in glycolysis after 17AAG therapy, and Her2 reduction more accurately predicts subsequent tumor growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: HER2 PET is an earlier predictor of tumor response to 17AAG therapy than (18)F-FDG PET.     

Comparison of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET in esophageal cancer.

18F-FDG PET has gained acceptance for staging of esophageal cancer. However, FDG is not tumor specific and false-positive results may occur by accumulation of FDG in benign tissue. The tracer 18F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) might not have these drawbacks. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of 18F-FLT PET for the detection and staging of esophageal cancer and to compare 18F-FLT PET with 18F-FDG PET. Furthermore, the correlation between 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake and proliferation of the tumor was investigated. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy-proven cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction were staged with CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and ultrasound of the neck. In addition, all patients underwent a whole-body 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET. Standardized uptake values were compared with proliferation expressed by Ki-67 positivity. RESULTS: 18F-FDG PET was able to detect all esophageal cancers, whereas 18F-FLT PET visualized the tumor in 8 of 10 patients. Both 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FLT PET detected lymph node metastases in 2 of 8 patients. 18F-FDG PET detected 1 cervical lymph node that was missed on 18F-FLT PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET showed uptake in benign lesions in 2 patients. The uptake of 18F-FDG (median standardized uptake value [SUV(mean)], 6.0) was significantly higher than 18F-FLT (median SUV(mean), 3.4). Neither 18F-FDG maximum SUV (SUV(max)) nor 18F-FLT SUV(max) correlated with Ki-67 expression in the linear regression analysis. CONCLUSION: In this study, uptake of 18F-FDG in esophageal cancer is significantly higher compared with 18F-FLT uptake. 18F-FLT scans show more false-negative findings and fewer false-positive findings than do 18F-FDG scans. Uptake of 18F-FDG or 18F-FLT did not correlate with proliferation.