An Analysis of Complication Risk Factors in 641 Nipple Reconstructions

Nipple‐areola reconstruction represents the completion of the breast restorative process and is associated with significant positive psychological implications. While factors such as medical comorbidities, smoking status, and radiation therapy have been shown to be associated with an increase in complications following breast reconstruction, their impact on nipple reconstruction remains largely unaddressed in the literature. An IRB‐approved, retrospective review of 472 patients who underwent nipple reconstruction at Wake Forest University over a 15‐year period was completed. Demographic and surgical characteristics were assessed including age, body mass index, medical comorbidities, smoking status, need for radiation, breast reconstruction type, and nipple flap used. Four hundred and seventy‐two patients with 641 nipple reconstructions were included with an average follow‐up of 56.5 months. Radiation prior to nipple reconstruction was required in 146 breasts (22.8%). Overall, postoperative nipple projection problems occurred in 7.6% of reconstructions with a 4.1% rate of other complications, including nipple necrosis, tip loss, wound infection and wound breakdown. Implant‐based reconstruction and radiation were associated with significantly more nipple projection problems (p = 0.009 and 0.05, respectively). Higher rates of complications and nipple projection problems were seen with skate flap reconstruction compared to a star flap (p = 0.046 and 0.001, respectively). Implant‐based breast reconstruction and radiotherapy are associated with higher rates of nipple reconstruction problems. Identification of patient and surgical variables associated with increased risk of poor outcomes preoperatively could help in patient counseling and selection of the most appropriate method of breast and nipple reconstruction.     

Smoking increases donor site complications in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap

Objective: Reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) is considered to be the first choice for autologous breast reconstruction. The primary aims of this retrospective study were to find out if differences in smoking habits and BMI are useful predictors for postoperative complications in DIEP surgery.

Methods: Three hundred and one patients were included. Data regarding smoking habits, BMI, age at surgery, total and final flap weight, abdominal scars, parity, number of perforators, chemotherapy, post mastectomy radiation therapy, and preoperative mapping of perforators with either Computer Tomography Angiography or hand-held ultra sound Doppler were collected. Complications that occurred in the first 30 postoperative days were taken into account.

Results and conclusions: It was found that former smokers had a risk for donor site complication more than double that of never smokers (OR =2.12, CI =1.10–4.10, p?=?0.025). Differences in BMI within the range from 18–33.7 did not have any significant impact on complication rates, neither at the donor site nor at the breast.     

Positive effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery protocols are successfully implemented in different surgical specialties, but a specific protocol for autologous breast reconstruction is missing. The aim of this study was to determine whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol contributes to a reduced length of stay without an increase in postoperative complications for patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.Materials en methodsThe effect of the ERAS protocol was examined using a single-center patient-control study comparing two groups of patients. Patients who underwent surgery between November 2017 and November 2018 using the ERAS protocol were compared with a historical control group (pre-ERAS) who underwent surgery between November 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain and postoperative complications.Results152 patients were included (ERAS group, n = 73; control group, n = 79). Mean hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (5 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). The average pain score was 1.73 in de the ERAS group compared to 2.17 in the control group (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complications. The ERAS group experienced less constipation (41 vs. 25 patients, p = 0.028).ConclusionAn enhanced recovery after surgery protocol contributes an accelerated postoperative recovery of patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. In this study a significant decrease was found in hospital length of stay, patient-reported pain score and adverse health issues.     

Higher body mass index is a more important risk factor than sarcopenia for complications in reconstruction of the deep inferior epigastric perforator

BackgroundIn recent years, breast reconstruction using autologous tissue after breast cancer surgery has become a common procedure. This study investigated the association between the occurrence of complications in breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and patient risk factors among Asian women.MethodsThis study included cases of breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps performed at our institution. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between preoperative and operative patient factors and postoperative complications by collecting data from medical records. Sarcopenia was also evaluated by calculating psoas muscle index from the area of the iliopsoas muscle at the level of the third lumbar vertebra using images from preoperative computed tomography. Postoperative complications were compared between a low-body mass index (BMI) group and a high-BMI group, defined using BMI values of <25 kg/m² and ≥25 kg/m², respectively.ResultsA total of 129 cases of breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps were included in this analysis. The frequency of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the high-BMI group, including for skin flap necrosis of the breast (p = 0.03), recipient-site infection (p = 0.03), and donor-site seroma (p = 0.003). Moreover, abdominal circumference correlated significantly with recipient-site infection (p = 0.01) and donor-site seroma (p = 0.002). Sarcopenia did not show significant correlations with any complications.ConclusionBMI was identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative complications in breast reconstruction using the DIEP flap, but sarcopenia was not.     

应用腹部皮瓣行乳房再造术后供区并发症的处理

目的:探讨应用腹部皮瓣行乳房再造术后供区并发症产生的原因及处理方法。方法:自2003年8月至2005年2月应用腹部皮瓣进行乳房再造24例,共处理供区并发症7例。结果:本组出现供区并发症者7例,经积极处理后均得到治愈,随访效果良好。结论:应用腹部皮瓣进行乳房再造术后供区并发症主要为伤口脂肪液化、切口边缘皮肤部分坏死及腹壁膨隆,经过相应处理可取得满意效果。     

Operative risk stratification in the obese female undergoing implant‐based breast reconstruction

The prevalence of obesity is growing, and breast reconstruction in the obese patient is becoming the norm rather than the exception. Our aim was to evaluate implant reconstruction outcomes in the obese female in the presence of coincident surgical risk factors and identify potential risk‐reducing interventions. A review of consecutive obese women (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, oncologic treatments, and reconstructive procedures and their complications were recorded. A total of 151 women (242 breast reconstructions) were included with mean follow‐up of 28 months. Average BMI was 36. Eighty percent of cases were immediate and 20% delayed. ADMs were utilized in 58% of cases. About 25% of patients had diabetes with one‐third achieving perioperative glycemic control. About 18% of women were active smokers, and 33% had radiotherapy. Major and minor complications occurred in 42% and 11% of patients, respectively. About 24% of reconstructed breasts required implant removal. Obese patients with prior radiation were three times as likely to develop infection (P = 0.008) and 2.5× as likely to undergo explantation (P = 0.002). Skin flap necrosis was three times as likely in obese smokers (P = 0.01). Increased rates of wound breakdown were identified in obese patients with increasing age (P = 0.005), smoking (P = 0.0035), and radiation (P = 0.023). In the obese radiated and smoking patient subgroups, surgical modifications (use of autologous tissue, delayed breast reconstruction timing, and no ADM) were associated with reduction in the relative risk for implant complications. While obesity alone increases implant breast reconstruction complication rates, the presence of additional risk factors compounds these rates. The use of surgical modifications may reduce the occurrence of perioperative complications in the obese female with coincident surgical risk factors undergoing implant breast reconstruction.     

Oncological Advantages of Oncoplastic Breast‐Conserving Surgery in Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

The standard approach to breast‐conserving surgery is wide local excision of the tumor and radiotherapy. However, a significant number of patients require further surgery to obtain oncologically clear margins, and may obtain a poor cosmetic result following adjuvant radiotherapy. Oncoplastic techniques may result in improved cosmesis, but few studies have investigated the oncological advantage of this approach. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare tumor clearance and the need for further margin excision following standard wide local excision (group A, 121 patients), and oncoplastic breast‐conserving surgery (group B, 37 patients). These techniques included therapeutic mammoplasty, sub‐axillary fat pad rotation mammoplasty, thoraco‐epigastric flap, and central flap. Compared to standard surgery (group A), oncoplastic techniques (group B) can be employed for significantly larger tumors (17.6 mm versus 23.9 mm, p = 0.002). Oncoplastic breast‐conserving surgery results in higher mean specimen weights (58.1 g versus 231.1 g, p < 0.0001), higher specimen volumes (112.3 cm³ versus 484.5 cm³, p < 0.0001), and wider clear margins (6.1 mm versus 14.3 mm, p < 0.0001), resulting in lower rates of further surgery (28.9% versus 5.4%, p = 0.002). There was no statistical increase in complication rates following oncoplastic surgery. Oncoplastic breast‐conserving surgery is more successful than standard wide local excision in treating larger tumors and obtaining wider radial margins, thus reducing the need for further margin excision, which delays adjuvant therapy. There was no increase in postoperative complication rate using an oncoplastic approach.     

Risk factors of mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction using low abdominal flaps

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with mastectomy skin flap necrosis during immediate reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps.

Methods: This study reviewed 1116 cases of immediate breast reconstruction over 10 years. Patients ranged in age from 29–76 years (average = 45.1 years), and had an average follow-up period of 65.6 months. Thirteen factors (age, BMI (body mass index), smoking habits, diabetes ptosis grade, midclavicle-to-nipple distance, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, free or pedicled flap, mastectomy method, surgeon, stage, axillary dissection, mastectomy weight) known to be associated with mastectomy flap necrosis were retrospectively analysed. The odds ratios of the risk factors were calculated using logistic regression analyses.

Results: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis occurred in 247 cases (22.1%). Univariate regression analysis showed that the odds ratio of age, BMI, ptosis grade, midclavicle-to-nipple distance, free flap, mastectomy method, surgeon, stage, and mastectomy weight were significant and the odds ratios determined using multivariate analysis were significant for mastectomy method, surgeon, and mastectomy weight.

Conclusion: During breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue, the independent risk factors that affect mastectomy skin flap necrosis include the mastectomy method, surgeon, and the weight of the mastectomy specimen. Awareness of the impact of each risk factor will lead to the modification and individualisation of surgical techniques and continually improve outcomes.     

Minimising the learning curve while introducing a local microsurgical breast reconstruction service in a District General Hospital

Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is associated with numerous benefits. The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEAP) flap aims to minimize the donor site morbidity. A significant learning curve has often been demonstrated with the introduction of this flap. We examined the outcomes and complications for our first 70 DIEAP flap reconstructions in 67 patients. We found no significant difference in any complication between the early and late groups. We found a significant decrease in the length of stay of patients from 7.4 to 5.9 days (P 0.037). There was a significant reduction in the length of delayed unilateral reconstructions operation from 554 to 480 minutes (P 0.038). Microsurgical breast reconstruction has been successfully introduced by a single surgeon, in a district general hospital (DGH).     

Immediate breast reconstruction for stage III breast cancer using transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap

Background: The management of stage III breast cancer is challenging; it often includes multimodal treatment with systemic therapy and/or radiation therapy and surgery. Immediate breast reconstruction has not traditionally been performed in these patients. We review the results of immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap in 21 patients treated for stage III breast cancer. Methods: Data have been collected retrospectively on 21 patients diagnosed with stage III breast cancer between 1987 and 1994. All patients had mastectomy and immediate TRAM reconstruction. Thirteen patients received primary systemic therapy, 10 patients received postoperative consolidation radiotherapy to the operative site, and 3 patients received preoperative radiation. Results: Mean follow-up for the group was 26 months. Two patients died with disseminated disease: neither of them developed local disease recurrence in the operative site; 82% of the patients followed for at least two years are free of disease. Sixty-two percent of the patients received preoperative chemotherapy, the remaining patients received postoperative multiagent chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Two of the patients received autologous bone marrow transplants after their adjuvant therapy. Ten patients had postoperative radiotherapy for consolidation; three patients received preoperative radiation. Conclusions: Immediate TRAM reconstruction for stage III breast cancer is not associated with a delay in adjuvant therapy or an increased risk of local relapse. It facilitates wide resection of involved skin without skin grafting. Radiation therapy can be delivered to the reconstructed breast when indicated without difficulty. Breast reconstruction facilitates surgical resection of stage III breast cancer with primary closure and should be considered if the patient desires immediate breast reconstruction.Results of this study were presented at the 48th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, March 23–26, 1995.     

Oncoplastic Mammoplasty as a Strategy for Reducing Reconstructive Complications Associated with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

Given the high complication rates in patients who require radiation therapy (XRT) after mastectomy and immediate reconstruction, and the low local recurrence rates following neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservation therapy, we sought to determine if using neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy and oncoplastic mammoplasty as an alternative to mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an effective strategy for reducing complication rates in the setting of XRT. A prospectively maintained data base was queried for patients who received neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy and XRT between 2001 and 2010 and underwent either oncoplastic mammoplasty or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Rates of postoperative complications between groups were compared using Fisher's exact test. Outcomes from 37 patients who underwent oncoplastic mammoplasty were compared to 64 patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Mean follow‐up was 33 months (range 4–116 months). Rates of postoperative complications, including unplanned operative intervention for a reconstructive complication (2.7% versus 37.5%, p < 0.001), skin flap necrosis (10.8% versus 29.7%, p = 0.05), and infection (16.2% versus 35.9, p = 0.04) were significantly higher in the mastectomy group. Overall, 45.3% of patients who underwent mastectomy developed at least one breast complication, compared to 18.9% of patients who underwent oncoplastic mammoplasty (p = 0.01). If XRT is indicated after mastectomy, attempts should be made to achieve breast conservation through the use of neo‐adjuvant therapy and oncoplastic surgery in order to optimize surgical outcomes. Breast conservation with oncoplastic reconstruction does not compromise oncologic outcome, but significantly reduces complications compared to postmastectomy reconstruction followed by XRT.     

The efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by MDCTA in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction

Current methods of breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue include the transverse abdominal myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, deep inferior epigastric arterial perforator (DIEP) flap, superficial inferior epigastric arterial (SIEA) flap, and some other composite flaps. Because of the variant vascular anatomy in abdominal region, it is hard to choose an appropriate flap for a specific patient without accurate preoperative vascular mapping. This study was drawn to address the efficacy of preoperative vascular mapping by multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in selecting flap in abdominal flap breast reconstruction. A total of 34 breast reconstructions using abdominal flap from December 2006 to July 2009 were included. In all the patients included, MDCTA was performed preoperatively. Three indexes were obtained including choice of flaps, operation time, and flap complication rate. Then, these data were compared with the former data stored in the databank of our hospital from January 2004 to December 2006, before MDCTA was introduced in our center. Among the 34 patients, the flap selection was: SIEA flaps 11.8%, DIEP flaps 61.8%, TRAM flaps 11.8%, and bilateral flaps 14.7%. The correlate indexes from the data bank were as follows: SIEA flap 0; DIEP flaps 51.7%; TRAM flaps 32.8%; bilateral flaps 15.5%. p < 0.05 occurred between the comparison of SIEA, DIEP, and TRAM flap choice in the two groups. The operation time in the study group was as follows: SIEA flap (4.02 ± 0.46) hours, DIEP flap (6.23 ± 1.42) hours, TRAM flap (4.72 ± 1.53) hours, Bilateral flap (7.86 ± 1.16) hours; while the former correlate data were: DIEP (9.67 ± 1.74) hours, TRAM flap (6.64 ± 1.83) hours, bilateral flap (11.83 ± 1.35) (all the three comparison p < 0.05). The total flap complication rate was about 5.9% in the test group; while in the databank, it was 12.1% (p < 0.05). With the accurate mapping of vascular territory in abdomen by MDCTA, we could easily select a suitable abdominal flap for breast reconstruction, and we can also simplify the procedure to save operation time and make the process more safely.     

Delayed‐immediate hybrid breast reconstruction—Increasing patient input and precision in breast reconstruction

The benefits of breast reconstruction via free tissue transfer with simultaneous implant placement, that is, hybrid breast reconstruction, in select patients are well‐known. Challenges exist, however, and are related to proper implant selection as well as postoperative mastectomy skin necrosis. Here, the authors present an approach that increases reconstructive precision while minimizing postoperative mastectomy skin necrosis. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent immediate prepectoral tissue expander placement (stage 1) followed by delayed‐immediate hybrid breast reconstruction (stage 2) was performed. Parameters of interest included patient demographics, postoperative complications, and revision rates. A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 48.7 years (range, 30‐67 years) and a mean BMI of 26.3 kg/m² (range, 21.0‐35.3 kg/m²) who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction were included. Of the 62 free abdominal flaps, 45 (72.6%) and 17 (27.4%) were MS‐TRAM and DIEP flaps, respectively. The most common implant volume was 240 cc (range, 140‐445 cc). Following stage 1, minor and major complications were observed in nine (29%) and one (3.2%) patients, respectively. No major complications were noted after stage 2. Of note, no patient developed mastectomy skin necrosis or requested a change in implant size following stage 2. Delayed‐immediate hybrid breast reconstruction improves the ability to more precisely match patient expectations related to breast size and is associated with a reduction in the rate of mastectomy skin necrosis following the critical second stage of reconstruction.     

Factors that predict deep inferior epigastric perforator flap donor site hernia and bulge

Abstract

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Attention is now being focused on the impact of DIEP flap harvest technique on abdominal hernia rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate DIEP abdominal wall morbidity in relation to flap harvest and fascial closure technique. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2016 was performed. Post-operative evaluation of the abdominal wall integrity was performed by an operating consultant. The rectus fascia was closed using one of three techniques. The study included 202 patients, in whom 234 DIEP flaps were performed. Eight patients (3.4%) developed a clinically evident abdominal bulge post-operatively and one (0.5%) had a hernia. Harvesting two or more perforators was more likely to result in post-operative abdominal hernia/bulge than taking a single perforator (p?=?.032). Using a perforator from the lateral row or both rows was more likely to result in a hernia/bulge than if a single medial perforator was harvested (p?=?.026). Comparison of the rectus fascia closure technique did not show any statistically significant difference in abdominal wall morbidity. Consideration should be given towards perforator selection when harvesting a DIEP flap. Where appropriate, a suitable single medial row perforator with a favourable suprafascial course should be chosen. This study has not shown mesh-free fascial closure to be inferior to mesh-supported closure. Careful consideration to the role of synthetic mesh within this patient cohort should be given.     

Contralateral unaffected breast augmentation using zone IV as a SIEA flap during unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction

BackgroundContralateral breast augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction is a good option for women with small breasts. In patients with adequate lower abdominal tissues, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is often the first choice for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction. We use Zone IV, which is usually excised owing to its insufficient blood circulation, as a superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap for contralateral breast augmentation.MethodsBetween October 2004 and January 2016, 32 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap and an attempted simultaneous contralateral breast augmentation with an SIEA flap. The unilateral DIEP flap attached to the contralateral SIEA flap was split into two separate flaps after indocyanine green angiography. In all patients, ipsilateral internal mammary vessels were used as recipient vessels for DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The SIEA flap pedicle was anastomosed to several branches of the deep inferior epigastric vessels. The SIEA flap was inset beneath the contralateral breast through the midline.ResultsOf 32 patients, 27 underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and simultaneous unaffected breast augmentation using 25 SIEA or 2 superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flaps. All DIEP flaps survived, and total necrosis occurred in one SIEA flap. The mean weight of the final inset for DIEP flap reconstruction and SIEA or SCIP flap augmentation was 416 g and 112 g, respectively.ConclusionsUnilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and contralateral SIEA flap breast augmentation may be safely performed with satisfactory results.     

“Three-dimensional evaluation of breast volume changes following autologous free flap breast reconstruction over six months”

ObjectivesTo date, little is known about postoperative changes in breast volume after autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate breast volume changes following autologous free flap reconstruction and the factors affecting flap volume.Materials and methodsPatients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator, superficial inferior epigastric artery and profunda artery perforator flaps between December 2016 and January 2019 were included. Exclusion criteria were breast complications requiring surgical debridement, and the absence of at least two suitable three-dimensional images postoperatively. Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry volume measurements were performed at the time of standard surgical check-ups. Changes in breast volume were modeled using a quartic polynomial curve function in a nested mixed effects model.Results136 breasts in 101 patients were included. An average decrease of predicted breast volume was found from 637.8 cc (95%-CI [624.4, 651.1]) at two weeks to 566.6 cc (95%-CI [535.1, 598.0]) after three and 567.6 cc (95%-CI [515.9, 617.6]) after six months postoperatively. Reconstruction timing and first postoperatively measured breast volume showed a statistically significant difference in initial reconstructed breast volume and in the shape of the relationship between time and breast volume, whereas autologous technique and BMI only showed a statistically significant difference in initial reconstructed volume and mastectomy indication in the shape of the relationship.ConclusionThe final overall flap volume decreased to 88.9% of its original volume after six months. Gaining more insight into the factors influencing flap volume is of crucial importance to facilitate predictable surgical outcomes.     

Survival in breast cancer patients with a delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction after adjustment for socioeconomic status and comorbidity

PurposeOverall survival in breast cancer patients receiving a delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is better than in those without delayed breast reconstruction. This study aimed at determining the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) and comorbidity on these observations.Materials and methodsThis matched cohort study included all consecutive women undergoing a delayed DIEP flap reconstruction at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, between 1999 and 2013. Controls had not received any delayed breast reconstruction and were relapse-free after a corresponding follow-up interval. Matching was by year of and age at mastectomy, tumour stage and lymph node status. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and socioeconomic data were obtained from national registers. Associations with breast cancer-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.ResultsWomen in the DIEP group (N = 254) more often continued education after primary school (88.6% versus 82.6%, P = 0.026), belonged to the high-income group (76.0% versus 63.1%, P < 0.001), were in a partnership (57.1% versus 55.7%, P = 0.024) and healthier (median CCI 1.00 (range 0–13) versus 2.00 (range 0–16), P = 0.021) than the control group (N = 729). After adjustment for tumour and treatment factors, SES and comorbidity, OS remained significantly better for the DIEP group than the control group (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.44–3.55).ConclusionWomen with a delayed DIEP flap reconstruction are a subgroup of higher socioeconomic status and better health. Higher survival estimates for the DIEP group persisted after adjusting for those differences, suggesting the presence of further unmeasured covariates.     

The transverse upper gracilis flap: Efficiencies and design tips

The transverse upper gracilis free flap is a well-described option for breast reconstruction. The technique is a secondary choice for autologous breast reconstruction because the abdomen remains the primary donor site for breast reconstruction. However, in appropriately selected patients, the authors believe that the transverse upper gracilis flap remains a reliable flap for breast reconstruction. Its consistent anatomy, potentially reasonable donor site scar, limited functional morbidity and simultaneous two-team surgical approach make this flap a viable option for many patients. The technique, however, is not without drawbacks – known numbness of the medial thigh and the potential for chronic lymphedema of the lower leg, contour deformities of the medial thigh, and widening of the medial thigh scar need to be considered.The current article presents a harvest technique that is reliable, rapid and addresses each of the above-mentioned limitations with specific changes in the traditional technique. The article provides video documentation of the modified harvest technique using only monopolar cautery for the dissection.     

Going up DIEAP creek��Coventry and Warwickshire Plastic Surgery Department��s experience with lifeboats and paddles

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap is arguably the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite its manifold advantages, potential flap failure, often secondary to venous congestion, is a devastating possible complication. An appropriate salvage procedure may avoid DIEAP flap loss. To identify, describe and analyse DIEAP flap salvage procedures carried out by the senior author (and Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital Plastic Surgery Clinical lead) who has a special interest in breast reconstruction, over an 8-year period. A retrospective analysis of notes and logbooks was carried out to identify DIEAP flap breast reconstructions that required salvage procedures involving anastomoses in addition to or other than the routine deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and vein (DIEV) to internal mammary artery and vein (IMV). One hundred twenty-seven DIEAP reconstructed cases were identified of which seven required lifeboat procedures: (1) piggy back chimeric DIEAP/TRAM flap, (2) double barrelling and trouser legging IMV and DIEVs, (3) contralateral perforator anastomosis to stump of main ipsilateral DIEA, (4) venous graft and anastomosis to cephalic vein, (5) venous anastomosis to thoracodorsal vein and (6) multiple rib resection for friable radiotherapy damaged vessels. The DIEAP flap is an increasingly popular method of providing autologous breast reconstruction with good volume and reliable perforators. However, surgeons may find that the recipient vessels of choice or the perforators alone are not adequate to maintain a healthy, viable flap. We hope that knowledge of this department’s salvage options may add to methods described in the literature and therefore the armamentarium of others when faced with similar problems.