Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

ObjectiveTo assess safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided TAP block in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery for undescended testis.Subjects and methodsThis randomized controlled trial involved 108 children, 3–7 years old, randomly allocated into one of two equal groups; TAP Group and Control Group. All children received general anesthesia using propofol 1.5–2.5 mg/kg, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg. TAP Group received 0.5 ml/kg of ropivacaine 0.375% bilaterally under ultrasound guidance and control group received regular analgesics. Quality of analgesia was assessed using Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Objective behavioral pain score (OPS). The primary outcome measures were hemodynamic parameters and degree of pain. Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative fentanyl requirement, postoperative rescue analgesia (time and dose), complications, hospital stay and degree of satisfaction of patients and their parents.ResultsTAP block group had significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl dose (p < 0.001), significantly longer time to first postoperative request of analgesic (p < 0.001), lower analgesic dose during the first postoperative 24 h (p < 0.001) and lower pain scores along the whole 24 postoperative hours. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were within the clinically accepted range in the two groups. Parents’ satisfaction was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the TAP block group.ConclusionTAP block under ultrasound guidance was easy, safe, reliable and effective analgesic in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery for undescended testis.     

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in living liver donors: A prospective,randomized, double-blinded clinical trial

BackgroundTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block that reduces postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting and the need for postoperative opioids following various types of abdominal surgery. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of TAP block on postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption in living liver donors in whom a right “J” abdominal incision was used.MethodsThis prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study was conducted with 50 living liver donors, aged 18–65 years, who were scheduled to undergo right hepatectomy. Patients who received ultrasonography-guided subcostal TAP block were allocated into Group 1, and patients who did not receive TAP block were allocated into Group 2. The TAP blocks were performed bilaterally at the conclusion of surgery using 1.5 mg 1 kg^− 1 bupivacaine diluted with saline to reach a total volume of 40 mL. For each patient, morphine consumption, pain scores at rest and movement, sedation scores, nausea, vomiting and the need for antiemetic medication were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively by researchers who were blinded to the study groups.ResultsMorphine consumption was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 at the 2nd, 6th and 24th hours (P < 0.05). The mean total morphine consumption values after 24 h were 40 mg and 65 mg in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The TAP block significantly reduced postoperative visual analog scale pain scores both at rest and during movement at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe TAP block reduced 24-h postoperative morphine consumption and contributed to analgesia in living liver donors who underwent upper abdominal wall incisions.     

Postoperative continuous transversus abdominis plane block vs continuous wound infusion of levobupivacaine in females undergoing open gynecologic procedures

IntroductionTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is used as a part of multimodal analgesia in decreasing pain of lower abdominal wall incision. Local anesthetic instillation of wounds through subcutaneous or subfascial catheters is used to treat postoperative pain in different types of surgery. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to study the opioid-sparing effect of these two techniques (if any) compared to placebo in women undergoing gynecologic procedures through transverse lower abdominal incisions.MethodsSeventy-eight ASA I–III patients planned to undergo gynecologic procedures through a transverse lower abdominal incision were randomly divided into three equal groups: Control (C) group (n = 26), Continuous Wound Infusion (CWI) group (n = 26), and continuous transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) group (n = 26). After standardized general anesthetic and before extubation, the patients were given the allocated treatment. A morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was started postoperatively alongside with the local anesthetic (or placebo) infusion. Cumulative dose of morphine PCA in the first postoperative 48 h was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included visual analog pain score (VAS) at rest and on movement and complications of morphine PCA.ResultsThe cumulative dose of morphine PCA in the first postoperative 48 h was higher in control group than in groups CWI and TAP (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between groups CWI and TAP. No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding VAS during rest but TAP group showed less pain scores than groups C and CWI on movement. The three groups were similar regarding morphine side effects.ConclusionContinuous bilateral TAP block and CWI can decrease PCA morphine consumption in the first postoperative 48 h when compared to placebo in women undergoing gynecologic surgery through transverse lower abdominal incision. Continuous TAB block might give better analgesia with movement than CWI.     

Transversus abdominis plane block: The analgesic efficacy of a new block catheter insertion method

BackgroundLocal anesthetic (LA) administration via a correctly placed block catheter could help optimum deposition in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP). The aim of the study is to assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy of TAP block achieved by initially injecting the LA through a catheter placed by ultrasound-guided Seldinger catheter insertion approach (USCIA).MethodsFifty patients scheduled for open inguinal hernia repair were randomized into two groups. Group USCIA: Patients received USCIA-TAP block. Group control: Patients did not receive TAP block. All patients received patient-controlled intravenous morphine postoperatively. The analgesic efficacy of USCIA-TAP block was assessed measuring the total amount of postoperative morphine requirements over the first 48 h postoperatively. Pain scores and level of patient satisfaction with pain relief after surgery were noted.ResultsThe mean cumulative morphine requirement over the first 48 postoperative hours was significantly lower in USCIA group in comparison with the Control group (18.1 ± 4.1 vs. 57.9 ± 5.3 mg). The success rate of USCIA-TAP block catheter placement was 88%. The pain score of USCIA group was significantly lower at 3, 6, 12, and 24 postoperative hours compared with the Control group. The USCIA group had a significantly higher rate of satisfaction with regard to pain control in comparison with the Control group at the 12th and 24th postoperative hours (9 {8–10} vs. 6 {5–7} and 9 {8–10} vs. 7 {6–8}, respectively).ConclusionThe use of a single dose of USCIA-TAP block reduced the total amount of morphine requirement over the first 48 postoperative hours for patients undergoing abdominal surgery.     

Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) has been described for pain management following abdominal surgery in adults, but there are only few reports on its use in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound guided TAP block in patients scheduled for open appendectomy versus an active comparator (wound infiltration).MethodsForty-four children aged 4–16 years (ASA 1–2) were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups (22 in each). Patients in group (T) were assigned to receive ultrasound guided TAP block using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%, and those in group (L) were assigned to receive local infiltration by the surgeon. Maximum pain scores, the time to the first analgesic requirement and the number of analgesic requirements were recorded over 48 h.ResultsThe ultrasound guided TAP block increased the mean time to the first analgesic requirement (10.4 ± 1.5 h) in comparison with the local infiltration group (5.4 ± 1.5). The cumulative number of doses of analgesic was significantly lower in TAP group than in local infiltration group (3.7 ± 1.1 versus 5.3 ± 2.1) and the Pain Scale score was significantly lower in the TAP group over the study period. Besides, there were no complications attributable to the ultrasound guided TAP block.ConclusionUltrasound-guided TAP block with (0.4 ml/kg) 0.25% bupivacaine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic use without any clinical side-effects after appendectomy in children.     

Dexmedetomidine decreases the required amount of bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in pediatrics patients: a randomized study

BackgroundThe effect of dexmedetomidine on the potency of bupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in pediatric patients has not been investigated.Study objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine to decrease the concentration of bupivacaine needed for analgesia for ultrasound-guided TAP block in a pediatric patient undergoing hernia repair or hydrocelectomy.DesignThis is a randomized, double-blind, up-down, dose-finding study.SettingOperating room.PatientsSixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients aged 1-4 years scheduled for elective unilateral herniorrhaphy or hydrocelectomy.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups: group B (0.125% bupivacaine, 1 mL/kg) TAP block or group BD (0.125% bupivacaine plus 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, 1 mL/kg) TAP block.MeasurementsThe response of each child was observed for 60 seconds after skin incision and evaluated as ‘unsuccessful’ when skin incision caused a change in hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean blood pressure) 20% more than the preincision values. If the response was determined to be unsuccessful, the concentration of bupivacaine administrated to the next patient was increased by 0.02%. If it was successful, the concentration of bupivacaine administrated to the next patient was decreased by 0.02%.ResultsThe minimum local anesthetic concentration of bupivacaine was 0.0839% (0.0137) in the B group and 0.0550% (0.0169) in the BD group. The difference was statistically significant (t = 7.165, P = .0001). The total postoperative analgesic dosage of morphine was significantly higher in the B group (0.17 ± 0.04 mg/kg) than the BD group (0.11 ± 0.02 mg/kg, P = .001).ConclusionsThe addition of 2 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine reduced the minimum local anesthetic concentration of bupivacaine used for a TAP block and improved postoperative analgesia in children undergoing surgery for inguinal hernia repair or hydrocelectomy.     

The analgesic efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca block vs. continuous psoas compartment block after hip surgery: A comparative study

BackgroundBoth psoas compartment block and fascia iliaca compartment block have been shown to be reliable blocks for postoperative pain relief for procedures involving the hip joint. This study evaluated the efficacy of continuous psoas compartment block with continuous fascia iliaca block for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery.MethodsIn randomized blinded study Forty, ASA I–III patients aged 30–75 years, with BMI less than 40, scheduled for hip surgery, were divided to one of two groups. Group P: continuous psoas compartment block (n = 18) and group F: continuous fascia iliaca block (n = 19). Standard general anesthesia was induced after finishing the block technique. After recovery 30 ml of 0.125% levobupivacaine was injected through the catheter to all patients. Postoperative 24 h meperidine consumption, patient satisfaction, visual analogue scale pain scores at (1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) postoperative, postoperative hemodynamics (HR and MAp), evidence of sensory and motor blockades, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in 24 h postoperative meperidine requirements, postoperative VAS, patient satisfaction, postoperative hemodynamics, and distribution of sensory and motor block of (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves). The epidural anesthesia occurred in two patients in psoas group (11%).ConclusionBoth continuous fascia iliaca block and continuous psoas compartment block were comparable in providing safe and effective analgesia after hip surgery.     

Pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block vs thoracic paravertebral block for unilateral radical mastectomy with axillary evacuation

Study ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block in comparison with thoracic paravertebral block for postmastectomy pain.DesignA prospective randomized controlled study.SettingTertiary center, university hospital.PatientsSixty-four adult women, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I, II, and III, scheduled for unilateral modified radical mastectomy with axillary evacuation.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block, PS group (n = 32), or thoracic paravertebral block, PV group (n = 32).MeasurementsTwenty-four-hour morphine consumption and the time to rescue analgesic were recorded. The pain intensity evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) score at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively was also recorded.Main ResultsThe median (interquartile range) postoperative 24-hour morphine consumption was significantly increased in PS group in comparison to PV group (PS vs PV), 20 mg (16-23 mg) vs 12 mg (10-14 mg) (P < .001). The median postoperative time to first analgesic request was significantly shorter in PS group compared to PV group (PS, 6 hours [5-7 hours], vs PV, 11 hours [9-13 hours]) (P < .001). The intensity of pain was low in both groups in VAS 0, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively. However, there was significant reduction in VAS in PV group compared to PS group at 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively.ConclusionsPectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block was safe and easy to perform and decreased intensity of postmastectomy pain, but it was inferior to thoracic paravertebral block.     

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A double blind,randomized, placebo controlled study

IntroductionPain control in the morbidly obese can be especially challenging because of increased sensitivity to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The subcostal transversus abdominis plane block is associated with a large area of spread (T7-L1). The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that US-guided TAP blocks can reduce opioid consumption during the first 24 h after of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in comparison with port site local anesthetic infiltration and systemic analgesia.MethodSixty-three ASA II/III adult patients listed for elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were randomly allocated in one of three groups: Group I (OSTAP) received bilateral OSTAP block. Group II (Local) received local anesthetic infiltration at trocar port sites. Group III (Control) placebo group received TAP block and port site infiltration by same volumes of sterile normal saline. Twenty-four hours postopetrative morphine consumption, the dose of fentanyl (μg) required during surgery, equivalent morphine dose in the recovery unit (PACU) and first morphine dose were recorded. The quality of analgesia is assessed by Visual Analogue Scale for 24 h at rest and movement.ResultsThe mean opioid consumptions in PACU showed significant difference between the three groups, P = 0.02. The mean 24 h morphine consumption showed statistically significant difference between groups (P value < 0.001). Significant differences were found between both OSTAP and Local groups with control group (P < 0.001) and also between OSTAP and Local groups (P = 0.02). Pain score of OSTAP group was significantly lower than local infiltration group at 6 and 4 h at rest and movement respectively. OSTAP group had faster extubation time than other groups. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were not significant between groups. No signs or symptoms of local anesthetic systemic toxicity or complications were detected.ConclusionOblique subcostal TAP block is a good alternative for providing analgesia during the postoperative period. The block is easily performed using ultrasound guidance. It is safe, provides effective analgesia with significant morphine-sparing effect with reduced side-effects of opioids.     

Clinical evaluation of post-operative analgesia comparing suprascapular nerve block and interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery

BackgroundShoulder arthroscopic surgeries have a high incidence of severe post-operative pain significant enough to interfere with recovery and rehabilitation. A regional anaesthetic technique combined with general anaesthesia reduces intra-operative requirements of anaesthesia and provides a better post-operative pain relief. As the commonly employed technique of interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is associated with potential serious complications, suprascapular nerve block (SSB) can be used as a safer alternative.Methods and materialIn this prospective study, 60 ASA 1 or 2 adult patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery were randomised into two groups – ISB and SSB. In group ISB, ISB with 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 75 μg clonidine was given. In the SSB group SSB was given with 15 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 75 μg clonidine. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale and verbal pain scale scores and time to first rescue analgesia was noted. We used Student's t test and Chi-square/Fisher Exact test and used a statistical software to compare data.ResultsIn the present study, the mean duration of analgesia was 2.53 ± 2.26 h in SSB group compared to 7.23 ± 6.83 h in group ISB (p value < 0.05). Overall rescue analgesic requirements were higher in SSB group compared to ISB group (63.3% versus 40.0%) but this was statistically not significant (p value > 0.05).ConclusionBoth interscalene and SSB can be used to provide intra-operative and post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.     

Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado

Background and objectivesIn shoulder arthroscopy, on an outpatient basis, the patient needs a good control of the postoperative pain that can be achieved through regional blocks. Perineural dexamethasone may prolong the effect of these blocks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of perineural dexamethasone on the prolongation of the sensory block in the postoperative period for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in outpatient setting.MethodsAfter approval by the Research Ethics Committee and informed consent, patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia and ultrasound‐guided interscalene brachial plexus block were randomized into Group D – blockade performed with 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 6 mg (1.5 mL) of dexamethasone and Group C – 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 1.5 mL of 0.9% saline. The duration of the sensory block was evaluated in 4 postoperative moments (0, 4, 12 and 24 hours) as well as the need for rescue analgesia, nausea and vomiting incidence, and Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS).ResultsSeventy‐four patients were recruited and 71 completed the study (Group C, n = 37; Group D, n = 34). Our findings showed a prolongation of the mean time of the sensitive blockade in Group D (1440 ± 0 min vs. 1267 ± 164 min, p < 0.001). It was observed that Group C had a higher mean pain score according to VAS (2.08 ± 1.72 vs. 0.02 ± 0.17, p < 0.001) and a greater number of patients (68.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) required rescue analgesia in the first 24 hours. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant.ConclusionPerineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the sensory blockade promoted by levobupivacaine in interscalene brachial plexus block, reduced pain intensity and rescue analgesia needs in the postoperative period.     

Post-thoracotomy pain relief: Thoracic paravertebral block compared with systemic opioids

BackgroundWe evaluated the safety and efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block as a method of pain relief after thoracotomy in comparison with systemic opioids.Study designRandomized controlled trial.MethodsWe scheduled 40 patients divided into two groups to receive either 20 ml bupivacaine (0.5%) incremental injections for intra and postoperative analgesia via a catheter inserted in the thoracic paravertebral space. The other 20 patients received systemic morphine for postoperative analgesia. We recorded postoperative Visual Analog Scale pain score, total morphine consumption, time to first analgesic request, changes in pulmonary functions and side effects.ResultsVisual analogue scale (VAS) at rest was lower in the paravertebral group at all measurement points except at 16, 20 and 24 h postoperatively. Pain on coughing showed significant difference (P value < 0.05) at 8 and 16 h but not at 24 h. Post-operative consumption of morphine was 36 (22–42) mg in the control group versus 9 (2–22) mg in the paravertebral block group (PVB) (P value = 0.003). Total bupivacaine dose used in the PVB group in the first 24 h was 300–420 mg. For time to first analgesic request it was significantly longer in the morphine group than the paravertebral block group. VAS at first analgesic request was not statistically different between the two groups.There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) preoperatively, after 12 h or 24 h.There was a significant reduction in the incidence of side effects in the TPVB group compared to morphine group concerning vomiting and pruritus.no local anesthetic toxicity was reported.ConclusionWe conclude that thoracic PVB provides effective post thoracotomy analgesia supported by lower VAS pain scores at rest and on coughing compared to intravenous morphine with significant less incidence of side effects.     

Dexamethasone bupivacaine versus bupivacaine for peribulbar block in posterior segment eye surgery

AimThe study conducted aims to assess the efficacy, time to first analgesic request, and postoperative inflammatory response after adding dexamethasone to local anesthetic mixture for a peribulbar block in posterior segment eye surgery.Patients and methodsA double-blind randomized study was carried out on 50 ASA I and II patients scheduled for elective posterior segment surgery (vitreoretinal). Patients were allocated randomly into two groups, 25 patients in each group. Group I received equal volumes of 10 ml of a l:1 mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% and saline, supplemented with 4 mg dexamethasone in 1 ml saline and group II received the same local anesthetic mixture (total volume 10 ml) without adding dexamethasone. The duration and onset of motor block, time to first analgesic request, postoperative inflammatory response, and other side effects such as nausea and vomiting were assessed.ResultsPatients receiving peribulbar block were significantly pain free by end of surgery (0 h) (P < 0.05) and throughout the postoperative period in the dexamethasone group at 2 and 6 h postoperatively. The number of patients requiring rescue analgesics was significantly lower with dexamethasone bupivacaine block (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly less in the first group (I) in comparison to the other group (II) (P < 0.05) and lastly the level of C reactive protein postoperatively was found to be significantly less in the dexamethasone group than the other one (P < 0.0001).ConclusionAdding dexamethasone to bupivacaine in peribulbar block appears to be a safe and clinically superior adjuvant with less postoperative pain, inflammatory response in patients undergoing posterior segment eye surgery.     

Combined preoperative femoral and sciatic nerve blockade improves analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Study objectiveTo compare preoperative femoral (FNB) with combined femoral and sciatic nerve block (CFSNB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.DesignProspective, randomized clinical trial.SettingAmbulatory surgery center affiliated with an academic medical center.PatientsSixty-eight American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I and II patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.InterventionsSubjects randomized to the CFSNB group received combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks preoperatively, whereas patients randomized to the FNB group only received femoral nerve block preoperatively. Both groups then received a standardized general anesthetic with a propofol induction followed by sevoflurane or desflurane maintenance. Intraoperative pain was treated with fentanyl. Pain in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was treated with ketorolac and opiates. Patients with significant pain despite ketorolac and opiates could receive a rescue nerve block.MeasurementsOur primary outcome variable was highest Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score in PACU. NRS pain scores, opioid consumption, opioid adverse effects, and patient satisfaction were assessed perioperatively until postoperative day 3.Main resultsThe highest PACU NRS pain score was significantly higher in the FNB group compared with the CFSNB group (7 [3-10] vs 5 [0-10], P = .002). The FNB group required significantly larger doses of opioids perioperatively (31.8 vs 19.8 mg intravenous morphine equivalents, P < .001). PACU length of stay was significantly longer in the FNB group (128.2 vs 103.1 minutes, P = .006). There was no significant difference in opioid consumption, pain scores, or patient satisfaction on postoperative days 1-3 between groups.ConclusionsPreoperative CFSNB for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction improves analgesia, decreases opioid consumption perioperatively, and decreases PACU length of stay when compared with FNB alone.     

Levobupivacaine patient controlled analgesia: Epidural versus blind fascia iliaca compartment analgesia – A comparative study

This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine patient controlled analgesia epidural versus patient controlled analgesia with fascia lliaca compartment block. In patients undergoing fixation of fracture neck femur.MethodsSixty patients ASA II&III undergoing fixation of fracture neck femur were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30).Group EEpidural group given levobupivacaine 0.25% 15 ml before induction of general anesthesia, followed by postoperative PCEA with levobupivacaine (0.125%).Group FFascia iliaca block group given levobupivacaine 0.25% 30 ml through the catheter before induction of general anesthesia, followed by postoperative patient controlled fascia illiaca analgesia with levobupivacaine (0.125%).Severity of postoperative pain at rest in 24 h using VAS, number of patients required additional analgesia (tramadol) in 24 h, doses of postoperative 24 h tramadol consumed, postoperative mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded.ResultsThe severity of postoperative pain was statistically significantly less in E group, number of patients required tramadol in 24 h were statistically significantly less in E group than F group, postoperative tramadol consumed was statistically significantly less in E group than F group.ConclusionPCEA with levobupivacaine (0.125%) was associated with satisfactory analgesia than patient controlled analgesia with fascia iliaca block in patients undergoing fixation of fracture neck femur.     

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine addition to bupivacaine on the quality of blind fascia iliaca compartment block in children undergoing femur fracture surgery

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine addition to bupivacaine on the quality of blind fascia iliaca compartment block in children undergoing femur fracture surgery.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were designed to detect the effects of addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine on the quality of blind fascia iliaca compartment block and its possible side effects in children undergoing fracture femur surgery.MethodsThis study was conducted on 28 children (2–6 years of age), scheduled for fracture femur surgery. Children were randomly allocated to receive either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml kg^?1 (B group), or 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml kg^?1 with dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg^?1 (BD group). Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1–1.5 minimum alveolar concentration. Intraoperative sevoflurane concentration, hemodynamic, postoperative emergence delirium, sedation scores and pain scores were recorded. Duration of surgery and emergence time were recorded. Postoperative complications such as (nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, purities, hypotension and bradycardia) were reported.ResultsCompared to the group B, patients received bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine for fascia iliaca compartment block had lower intraoperative sevoflurane concentration, higher sedation score, longer duration of postoperative analgesia, less use of rectal paracetamol for the first 24 h postoperatively and less number with postoperative agitation. No patients developed postoperative respiratory depression, purities, hypotension or bradycardia.ConclusionThe present study concluded that the combined use of bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine for fascia iliaca compartment block in children provided significant reduction of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration, remarkable hemodynamic stability, significant postoperative analgesia with lower postoperative analgesics requirements without any undesirable complications.     

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous methadone during general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a retrospective case-control study

BackgroundMost patients undergoing caesarean delivery with general anaesthesia require systemic opioid administration. Due to its rapid onset and long duration of action, intravenous methadone may make it suitable for analgesia after caesarean delivery. Intraoperative methadone combined with postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl or morphine has recently been introduced in our unit.MethodsA retrospective case-control study of 25 patients who had received methadone was performed. Fifty control patients undergoing elective or emergency caesarean delivery were matched for the use of postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Exclusion criteria included preoperative neuraxial analgesia or pre-delivery opioid consumption greater than 10 mg of intravenous morphine equivalents.ResultsPatients in the methadone group had lower pain scores and were less likely to require intravenous opioid supplementation in the post-anaesthetic care unit (P < 0.001). Opioid consumption over 48 h was significantly lower in the methadone group. Delayed discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit was due to sedation in one patient in the methadone group compared to three control patients in whom it was due to sedation and inadequate analgesia.ConclusionA single intraoperative bolus of intravenous methadone appeared to provide effective analgesia with an acceptable side-effect profile.     

Thoracic paravertebral block versus pectoral nerve block for analgesia after breast surgery

BackgroundPectoral nerve block (Pecs) is a novel interfascial plane block which can provide analgesia after breast surgery while paravertebral block (PVB) is widely used for this purpose. We evaluated the difference between the two techniques in regard to morphine consumption and analgesic efficacy after modified radical mastectomy (MRM).MethodsSixty patients undergoing elective MRM were randomly allocated into either PVB with 15–20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% at the level of fourth thoracic vertebra or Pecs block with 10 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% injected inbetween pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle and another 20 ml levobubivacaine 0.25% inbetween pectorlis minor and serratus anterior muscle. Primary outcome measure was morphine consumption in the first 24 h while secondary outcome measures included pain scores, intraoperative fentanyl consumption as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).ResultsPostoperative morphine consumed at 24 h was significantly lower in Pecs group [21 (20–25) mg] than in PVB group [28 (22–31) mg], (p = 0.002). Time for first request of morphine was longer in Pecs group [175 (155–220) min] than in PVB group [137.5 (115–165) min], (p < 0.001). Numerical rating score (NRS) at rest was lower in Pecs group compared with PVB group at 1 h, 6 h and 12 h (p < 0.001) but at 18 h and 24 h it was lower in PVB group compared with Pecs group (p = 0.008 and <0.001 respectively). During movement, NRS was significantly lower at 1st hour in Pecs group (p < 0.001) while at 18 h and 24 h it was significantly lower in PVB group (p < 0.001). PONV was comparable between both groups.ConclusionPecs block reduced postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 and pain scores in the first 12 h in comparison with PVB after mastectomy.     

Ultrasound guided single injection caudal epidural anesthesia of isobaric bupivacaine with/without dexamethasone for geriatric patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery

BackgroundDexamethasone has anti-inflammatory properties that can affect postoperative analgesia when added to caudal bupivacaine.MethodsSeventy-two geriatric patients scheduled for elective total hip replacement under ultrasound guided caudal anesthesia were randomized blindly into two groups: Group BD received caudal isobaric bupivacaine 0.25% (20 ml) and dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml) and Group BS received caudal isobaric bupivacaine 0.25% (20 ml) and normal saline (2 ml). Postoperative analgesia was assessed by recording time to first rescue analgesia and the analgesic doses (paracetamol and meperidine hydrochloride) required during the first 24 h postoperatively as a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the time taken to the onset of sensory analgesia at T10, time to the onset of complete motor block, VAS pain score at rest and on movement at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h, and postoperative adverse events.ResultsGroup BD had a significantly longer time to first rescue analgesia [402 (63) vs 213 (53)] min and significantly lower doses of paracetamol [3389 (728) vs 2833 (697)] mg meperidine hydrochloride [78 (30) vs 142 (28)] mg than Group BS. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group BD than Group BS both at rest and on movement respectively at 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h.ConclusionAdding dexamethasone with isobaric bupivacaine caudal anesthesia prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia and decreased postoperative analgesic requirement in geriatric patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery in comparison isobaric bupivacaine alone.     

Control of postoperative pain in knee arthroplasty: single dose femoral nerve block versus continuous femoral block

IntroductionTo compare the efficacy of a multimodal analgesia with 2 different techniques (femoral nerve block with a single dose and continuous femoral nerve block) in the control of pain, use of opioids, and secondary effects in patients subjected to total knee replacement.Material and methodsA prospective randomised study of patients subjected to knee replacement with subarachnoid anaesthesia. The postoperative analgesia consisted of tramadol, dexketoprofen and paracetamol, and one of the following techniques: Femoral nerve block with a single dose of 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, or that dose plus a continuous infusion via a femoral catheter of 0.375% ropivacaine 6 ml/h for 48 h. The demographic, anaesthetic and surgical variables were recorded, along with the pain intensity using a visual analogue scale, opioid use, and complications at 24 and 48 h after surgery.ResultsA total of 104 patients were included. There no differences in the demographic data between the groups. The pain intensity was lower in the group that had continuous femoral block, particularly at 48 h, compared to the single-dose block, and with a lower use of rescue analgesia in the continuous femoral block. The incidence in secondary effects was similar, with a lower long-term sensory block being observed in the femoral block with a single dose.ConclusionsThe use of peripheral nerve block is accepted practice for analgesia after knee replacement surgery. Continuous femoral block is a valid alternative, decreasing the use of rescue opiates and pain intensity (particularly at 48 h) compared to isolated femoral block.