Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Resistance to Fluoroquinolones of Urinary Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Nursing Home Residents: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectivesThis study investigated the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on fluoroquinolone (FLQ) resistance in urinary Enterobacteriaceae isolated from residents of 3 French nursing homes.DesignA multicentric retrospective before-and-after study was conducted.Setting and ParticipantsAll the first urinary Enterobacteriaceae isolates obtained from nursing home residents were included. Two time frames were analyzed: 2013-2015 and 2016-2017.MethodsThe antimicrobial stewardship program started in 2015 and was based on (1) 1-day training for use of an “antimicrobial stewardship kit for nursing homes;” and (2) daily support and training of the coordinating physician by an antibiotic mobile team (AMT) in 2 of 3 nursing homes.ResultsOverall, 338 urinary isolates were analyzed. Escherichia coli was the most frequent species (212/338, 63%). A significant reduction of resistance to ofloxacin was observed between 2013-2015 and 2016-2017 in general (Δ = −16%, P = .004) and among isolates obtained from patients hospitalized in the county nursing home with AMT support (Δ = −28%, P < .01). A nonstatistically significant reduction in ofloxacin resistance was also observed in the hospital nursing home with AMT support (Δ = −18%, P = .06).Conclusions and ImplicationsOur antimicrobial stewardship program resulted in a decrease in resistance to FLQ among urinary Enterobacteriaceae isolated from nursing home residents. The support of an AMT along with continuous training of the coordinating physician seems to be an important component to ensure efficacy of the intervention.     

Changes in Long-Term Care Markets: Assisted Living Supply and the Prevalence of Low-Care Residents in Nursing Homes

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of changes in assisted living (AL) capacity within a market on prevalence of residents with low care needs in nursing homes.DesignRetrospective, longitudinal analysis of nursing home markets.Setting and participantsTwelve thousand two hundred fifity-one nursing homes in operation during 2007 and 2014.MeasurementsWe analyzed the percentage of residents in a nursing home who qualified as low-care. For each nursing home, we constructed a market consisting of AL communities, Medicare beneficiaries, and competing nursing homes within a 15-mile radius. We estimated the effect of change in AL beds on prevalence of low-care residents using multivariate linear models with year and nursing home fixed effects.ResultsThe supply of AL beds increased by an average 258 beds per nursing home market (standard deviation = 591) during the study period. The prevalence of low-care residents decreased from an average of 13.0% (median 10.5%) to 12.2% (median 9.5%). In adjusted models, a 100-bed increase in AL supply was associated with a decrease in low-care residents of 0.041 percentage points (P = .026), controlling for changes in market and nursing home characteristics, county demographics, and year and nursing home fixed effects. In markets with a high percentage of its Medicare beneficiaries (≥14%) dual eligible for Medicaid, the effect of AL is stronger, with a 0.066–percentage point decrease per 100 AL beds (P = .026) vs a 0.016–percentage point decrease in low-duals markets (P = .48).Conclusions and implicationsOur analysis suggests that some of the growth in AL capacity serves as a substitute for nursing homes for patients with low care needs. Furthermore, the effects are concentrated in markets with an above-average proportion of beneficiaries with dual Medicaid eligibility.     

Utilization by Long-Term Nursing Home Residents Under Accountable Care Organizations

ObjectivesNursing home care is common and costly. Accountable care organization (ACO) payment models, which have incentives for care that is better coordinated and less reliant on acute settings, have the potential to improve care for this high-cost population. We examined the association between ACO attribution status and utilization and Medicare spending among long-term nursing home residents and hypothesized that attribution of nursing home residents to an ACO will be associated with lower total spending and acute care use.DesignObservational propensity-matched study.Setting and ParticipantsMedicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were long-term nursing home residents residing in areas with ≥5% ACO penetration.MethodsACO attribution and covariates used in propensity matching were measured in 2013 and outcomes were measured in 2014, including hospitalization (total and ambulatory care sensitive conditions), outpatient emergency department visits, and Medicare spending.ResultsNearly one-quarter (23.3%) of nursing home residents who survived into 2014 (n = 522,085, 76.1% of 2013 residents) were attributed to an ACO in 2013 in areas with ≥5% ACO penetration. After propensity score matching, ACO-attributed residents had significantly (P < .001) lower hospitalization rates per 1000 (total: 402.9 vs 419.9; ambulatory care sensitive conditions: 64.4 vs 71.4) and fewer outpatient ED visits (29.9 vs 33.3 per 100) but no difference in total spending ($14,071 vs $14,293 per resident, P = .058). Between 2013 and 2014, a sizeable proportion of residents’ attribution status switched (14.6%), either into or out of an ACO.Conclusions and ImplicationsACO nursing home residents had fewer hospitalizations and ED visits, but did not have significantly lower total Medicare spending. Among residents, attribution was not stable year over year.     

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Adaptation of the WHELD Person-Centered Nursing Home Training Program

ObjectiveDigital approaches to delivering person-centered care training to nursing home staff have the potential to enable widespread affordable implementation, but there is very limited evidence and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital training in the nursing home setting. The objective was to evaluate a digital person-centered care training intervention in a robust RCT.DesignWe conducted a 2-month cluster RCT in 16 nursing homes in the United Kingdom, randomized equally to receive a digitally adapted version of the WHELD person-centered care home training program with virtual coaching compared to the digital training program alone.Setting and ParticipantsThe study was conducted in UK nursing homes. There were 175 participants (45 nursing home staff and 130 residents with dementia).MethodsThe key outcomes were the well-being and quality of life (QoL) of residents with dementia and the attitudes and knowledge of nursing home staff.ResultsThere were significant benefits in well-being (t = 2.76, P = .007) and engagement in positive activities (t = 2.34, P = .02) for residents with dementia and in attitudes (t = 3.49, P = .001), including hope (t = 2.62, P = .013) and personhood (t = 2.26, P = .029), for staff in the group receiving digital eWHELD with virtual coaching compared to the group receiving digital learning alone. There was no improvement in staff knowledge about dementia.Conclusion and ImplicationsThe study provides encouraging initial clinical trial evidence that a digital version of the WHELD program supported by virtual coaching confers significant benefits for care staff and residents with dementia. Evidence-based digital interventions with remote coaching may also have particular utility in supporting institutional recovery of nursing homes from the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Time Trends in Opioid Use by Dementia Severity in Long-Term Care Nursing Home Residents

ObjectiveCurrent information on opioid use in nursing home residents, particularly those with dementia, is unknown. We examined the temporal trends in opioid use by dementia severity and the association of dementia severity with opioid use in long-term care nursing home residents.DesignRepeated measures cross-sectional study.SettingLong-term care nursing homes.ParticipantsUsing 20% Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Medicare claims from 2011-2017, we included long-term care residents (n = 734,739) from each year who had 120 days of consecutive stay. In a secondary analysis, we included residents who had an emergency department visit for a fracture (n = 12,927).MeasurementsDementia was classified as no, mild, moderate, and severe based on the first MDS assessment each year. In the 120 days of nursing home stay, opioid use was measured as any, prolonged (>90 days), and high-dose (≥90 morphine milligram equivalent dose/day). For residents with a fracture, opioid use was measured within 7 days after emergency department discharge. Association of dementia severity with opioid use was evaluated using logistic regression.ResultsOverall, any opioid use declined by 8.5% (35.2% to 32.2%, P < .001), prolonged use by 5.0% (14.1% to 13.4%, P < .001), and high-dose by 21.4% (1.4% to 1.1%, P < .001) from 2011 to 2017. Opioid use declined across 4 dementia severity groups. Among residents with fracture, opioid use declined by 9% in mild, 9.5% in moderate, and 12.3% in severe dementia. The odds of receiving any, prolonged, and high-dose opioids decreased with increasing severity of dementia. For example, severe dementia reduced the odds of any [23.5% vs 47.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.57], prolonged (9.8% vs 20.7%; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.71), and high-dose (1.0% vs 2.3%; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.74) opioids.Conclusions and ImplicationsUse of opioids declined in nursing home residents from 2011 to 2017, and the use was lower in residents with dementia, possibly reflecting suboptimal pain management in this population.     

Greater Opioid Use Among Nursing Home Residents in Ontario,Canada During the First 2 Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic

ObjectivesTo examine the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and opioid use among nursing home residents followed up to March 2021, and possible variation by dementia and frailty status.DesignPopulation-based cohort study with an interrupted time series analysis.Setting and ParticipantsLinked health administrative databases for residents of all nursing homes (n = 630) in Ontario, Canada were examined. Residents were divided into consecutive weekly cohorts (first observation week was March 5 to 11, 2017 and last was March 21 to March 27, 2021).MethodsThe weekly proportion of residents dispensed an opioid was examined overall and by strata defined by the presence of dementia and frailty. Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average models with step and ramp intervention functions tested for immediate level and slope changes in weekly opioid use after the onset of the pandemic (March 1, 2020) and were fit on prepandemic data for projected trends.ResultsThe average weekly cohort ranged from 76,834 residents (prepandemic) to 69,359 (pandemic period), with a consistent distribution by sex (69% female) and age (54% age 85 + years). There was a statistically significant increased slope change in the weekly proportion of residents dispensed opioids (parameter estimate (β) = 0.035; standard error (SE) = 0.005, P < .001). Although significant for all 4 strata, the increased slope change was more pronounced among nonfrail residents (β = 0.038; SE = 0.008, P < .001) and those without dementia (β = 0.044; SE = 0.008, P < .001). The absolute difference in observed vs predicted opioid use in the last week of the pandemic period ranged from 1.25% (frail residents) to 2.28% (residents without dementia).Conclusions and ImplicationsAmong Ontario nursing home residents, there was a statistically significant increase in opioid dispensations following the onset of the pandemic that persisted up to 1 year later. Investigations of the reasons for increased use, potential for long-term use and associated health consequences for residents are warranted.     

A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Impact of Function and Behavior Focused Care for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of the Function and Behavior Focused Care for the Cognitively Impaired (FBFC-CI) intervention on function, physical activity, and behavioral symptoms among nursing home residents with dementia, and to explore the adoption of the intervention at the facility level.DesignThis study was a clustered, randomized controlled trial with a repeated measures design that was implemented in 12 nursing homes randomized to either treatment (FBFC-CI) or educational control [Function and Behavior Focused Care Education (FBFC-ED)].Setting and ParticipantsTwelve nursing homes (6 treatment and 6 control) and 336 residents (173 treatment and 163 control) with moderate to severe cognitive impairment.MeasuresOutcomes included functional ability (Barthel Index), physical activity (actigraphy and survey), behavioral symptoms (Resistiveness to Care Scale, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia), and psychotropic medication use.ResultsThe participants were 82.6 (SD = 10.1) years of age, mostly female, and were moderate to severely cognitively impaired (Mini-Mental State Exam of 7.8, SD = 5.1). There was a significantly greater increase in time spent in total activity (P = .004), moderate activity (P = .012), light activity (P = .002), and a decrease in resistiveness to care (P = .004) in the treatment versus control group at 4 months. There was no change in mood, agitation, and the use of psychotropic medications. There was some evidence of adoption of the intervention at treatment sites.Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study provides some support for the use of the FBFC-CI Intervention to increase time spent in physical activity and decrease resistive behaviors during care commonly noted among nursing home residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment.     

Federal Nursing Home Policies on Antipsychotics had Similar Impacts by Race and Ethnicity for Residents With Dementia

ObjectivesFederal initiatives have been successful in reducing antipsychotic exposure in nursing home residents with dementia. We assessed if these initiatives were implemented equally across racial and ethnic minority groups.DesignRetrospective, cross-sectional trends study.Setting and ParticipantsNational long-stay nursing home residents with dementia from 2011 to 2017.MethodsWe examined trends in psychotropic drug class exposures from the Minimum Data Set assessments for non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) residents using interrupted time-series analyses with age-sex standardized quarterly outcomes and time points to denote the National Partnership (2012) and Five Star Rating changes (2015).ResultsInitially, antipsychotic (33.0%) and sedative (6.8%) exposure was highest for Hispanic residents; antidepressant (59.8%) and anxiolytic (23.4%) exposure was highest for NHW residents; NHB residents had the lowest use of each. Antipsychotic use dropped at the time of the Partnership (β = −0.8807, P = .0023) and the slope declined further after the Partnership (β = −0.6611, P < .0001) for NHW. In comparison to NHW, the level and slope changes for NHB and Hispanics were not significantly different. The Five Star Rating change did not impact the level of antipsychotic use (β = 0.027, P = .9467), but the slope changed to indicate a slowed rate of decline (β = 0.1317, P = .4075) for NHW. As to the other psychotropic drug classes, there were few significant differences between trends seen in the racial and ethnic subgroups. The following exceptions were noted: antidepressant use decreased at a faster rate for NHB residents post-Partnership (β = −0.1485, P = .0371), and after the Five Star Rating change, NHB residents (β = −0.0428, P = .0312) and Hispanic residents (β = −0.0834, P < .0001) saw antidepressant use decrease faster than NHW. Sedative use in slope post-Partnership period (β = −0.086, P = .0275) and post–Five Star Rating (β = −0.0775, P < .0001) declined faster among Hispanic residents.Conclusions and ImplicationsWe found little evidence of clinically meaningful differences in changes to 4 classes of psychotropic medication use among racial and ethnic minority nursing home residents with dementia following 2 major federal initiatives.     

To What Extent Do Local Nursing Home Prescribing Patterns Relate to Psychotropic Prescribing in Assisted Living?

ObjectiveIn nursing homes (NHs), psychoactive medication use has received notable attention, but less is known about prescribing in assisted living (AL). This study examined how antipsychotic and antianxiety medication prescribing in AL compares with NHs.DesignObservational, cross-sectional AL data linked to publicly reported NH measures.Setting and ParticipantsRandom sample of 250 AL communities and the full sample of 3371 NHs in 7 states.MethodsWe calculated the percentage of residents receiving antipsychotics and antianxiety medications. For each AL community, we calculated the distance to NHs in the state. Linear models estimated the relationship between AL prescribing and that of the closest and farthest 5 NHs, adjusting for AL characteristics and state fixed effects.ResultsThe prescribing rate of potentially inappropriate antipsychotics (i.e., excluding for persons with recorded schizophrenia and Tourette syndrome) and of antianxiety medications (excluding for those on hospice) in AL was 15% and 21%, respectively. Unadjusted mean antipsychotic prescribing rates were nominally higher in AL than NHs (14.8% vs 14.6%; P = .056), whereas mean antianxiety prescribing was nominally lower in AL (21.2% vs 22.6%; P = .032). In adjusted analyses, AL rates of antipsychotic use were not associated with NH rates. However, being affiliated with an NH was associated with a lower rate of antipsychotic use [b = −0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.50 to −0.001; P = .043], whereas antianxiety rates were associated with neighboring NHs’ prescribing rates (b = 0.43; 95% CI 0.16–0.70; P = .002).Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study suggests reducing antipsychotic medication use in NHs may influence AL practices in a way not accounted for by local NH patterns. And, because antianxiety medications have not been the focus of national campaigns, they may be more subject to local prescribing behaviors. It seems advantageous to consider prescribing in AL when efforts are implemented to change NH prescribing, as there seems to be related influence whether by affiliation or region.     

Body Mass Index as a Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in Nursing Home Residents During a 5-Year Follow-up

BackgroundBody mass index (BMI) is considered a short-term mortality predictor, but a consensus has not been reached on its role and that of other nutritional parameters in predicting long-term mortality in nursing home residents.ObjectivesTo correlate BMI, Mini Nutritional Assessment scores, and serum albumin levels with the 5-year mortality rate in institutionalized elderly subjects.MethodsA total of 181 nursing home residents aged ≥70 years were included in a 5-year longitudinal study. Data were collected on all participants’ nutritional, health, cognitive, and functional status by means of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Data on the participants’ vital status were obtained 5 years after beginning the study, and a survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThe 5-year mortality rate was 63%. The deceased subjects (n = 115) had a lower BMI (24.7 ± 4.6 vs 26.6 ± 5.0 kg/m²; P = .03) and Mini Nutritional Assessment score (18.6 ± 3.7 vs 20.1 ± 3.6; P = .02) than those still alive. Serum albumin levels did not differ between the two groups. Among the three indicators of nutritional status considered in this study, only BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² was significantly associated with a lower mortality risk at 5 years (hazard ratio = 0.432; 95% CI 0.20-0.70; P = .04), the risk for death being greater the lower the BMI class (log-rank test: P < .001).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that BMI is the best of the three parameters considered as a nutritional predictor of nursing home residents’ mortality in the longer term, and indicate that a lower mortality risk coincides with a higher BMI.     

The Association Between Quality of Care and Quality of Life in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents With Preserved Cognition

ObjectivesTo assess the overall quality of life of long-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition, to examine whether the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's Nursing Home Compare 5-star quality rating system reflects the overall quality of life of such residents, and to examine whether residents' demographics and clinical characteristics affect their quality of life.Design/measurementsQuality of life was measured using the Participant Outcomes and Status Measures—Nursing Facility survey, which has 10 sections and 63 items. Total scores range from 20 (lowest possible quality of life) to 100 (highest).Setting/participantsLong-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition (n = 316) were interviewed.ResultsThe average quality- of-life score was 71.4 (SD: 7.6; range: 45.1–93.0). Multilevel regression models revealed that quality of life was associated with physical impairment (parameter estimate = −0.728; P = .04) and depression (parameter estimate = −3.015; P = .01) but not Nursing Home Compare's overall star rating (parameter estimate = 0.683; P = .12) and not pain (parameter estimate = −0.705; P = .47).ConclusionThe 5-star quality rating system did not reflect the quality of life of long-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition. Notably, pain was not associated with quality of life, but physical impairment and depression were.     

Effectiveness of Comanagement Model: Geriatric Medicine and Vascular Surgery

ObjectivesOlder surgical patients frequently develop postoperative complications due to their frailty and multiple comorbidities. Geriatric medicine consultation helps to optimize risk factors and improve outcomes in patients with hip fracture. This study aimed to evaluate patient outcomes before and after comanagement model implementation between geriatric medicine (Geriatric Surgical Service) and vascular surgery services.DesignThis was a case-control study involving emergency vascular surgical patients who were comanaged by vascular surgery, geriatric medicine, and geriatric nursing services.Settings and ParticipantsThis study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Singapore from 2015 to 2018 with acute vascular surgical patients aged older than 65 years.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 135 patients from 2013 to 2014 (control group) who fulfilled the criteria for the comanagement model was compared with a prospective cohort of 348 patients who were comanaged by a geriatric surgical service from 2015 to 2018, and a further subgroup analysis of patients between 2015 and 2016 (n = 150) (early intervention group) and between 2017 and 2018 (n = 198) (late intervention group) was performed.ResultsComanaged patients had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (11.6 vs 20.8 days, P = .001), reduced nosocomial infections (3% vs 12% for urinary tract infection, P = .003) and decreased 30-day readmission rates (22% vs 34%, P = .011). A trend of a decreased incidence of fluid overload was noted in patients comanaged with the geriatric surgical service (3% vs 7%, P = .073). Subgroup analysis showed progressive reductions in the length of stay (15.4 vs 11.6 days, P = .001), 30-day readmission rate (35% vs 22%, P = .01), and nosocomial urinary tract infection (8% vs 3%, P = .003) between the early intervention group and the late intervention group. Although they were not statistically significant, reductions were also observed in the delirium rate (13% vs 11%) and other postoperative medical complications in the early intervention group and the late intervention group.Conclusion and ImplicationsDespite having increasing comorbidities, older vascular surgical inpatients had a significantly shorter length of stay, reduced nosocomial infections, and decreased 30-day readmission rates through a comanagement model with vascular surgery and geriatric medicine services. Improvements in outcomes were observed over time as the model of care evolved. Geriatric medicine intervention in the perioperative period improves the outcomes of older acute vascular surgical patients.     

Response and Adherence of Nursing Home Residents to a Nutrition/Exercise Intervention

ObjectivesInterindividual response variability to nutrition and exercise interventions is extensive in older adults. A group of nursing home (NH) residents participated in a combined intervention. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to identify factors associated with intervention response measured by change in physical function and body composition.DesignPost-hoc analyses in the Older Person's Exercise and Nutrition study, a 2-arm randomized trial. The primary outcomes were 30-second Chair Stand Test and composite scores combining physical function and fat-free mass. A secondary outcome was intervention adherence. A 12-week intervention of sit-to-stand exercises and protein-rich nutritional supplements did not improve chair-stand capacity vs control on intention-to-treat basis.Setting and ParticipantsResidents ≥75 years of age from dementia and somatic units in eight NHs in Sweden.MethodsLogistic regressions were performed to define factors associated with response (maintenance/improvement) or nonresponse (deterioration) in 30-second Chair Stand Test, and with intervention adherence. Linear regressions were performed to explore factors associated with response in composite scores.ResultsMean age of participants (n = 52 intervention, n = 49 control) was 85.8 years. Sarcopenia was occurring in 74%. Sarcopenia at baseline (P = .005) and high adherence to nutritional supplements (P = .002) increased the odds of response. Higher independence in daily activities increased the odds of adherence to sit-to-stand exercises (P = .027) and the combined intervention (P = .020). Allocation to the intervention group and higher self-perceived health were associated with higher composite scores.Conclusions and ImplicationsNH residents with baseline sarcopenia, better self-perceived health, and high adherence to nutritional supplements benefitted most from a combined nutrition and exercise intervention regarding chair-stand capacity and composite scores of function and fat-free mass. Adherence was related to higher grade of independence. Understanding factors associated with response and adherence to an intervention will help target susceptible residents in most need of support and to optimize the outcome.     

Potentially Harmful Medication Prescribing by the Degree of Physician Specialization in Nursing Home Practice: An Observational Study

ObjectivesThe use of anticholinergics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and other potentially harmful medications (PHMs) is associated with particularly poor outcomes in nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Our objective was to compare PHM prescribing by NH physicians and advanced practitioners who focus their practice on NH residents (NH specialists) vs non-NH specialists.DesignRetrospective cohort study.Setting and ParticipantsWe included a 20% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD who resided in 12,278 US NHs in 2017. Long-stay NH residents with ADRD were identified using MDS, Medicare Parts A and B claims. Residents <65 years old or without continuous Part D coverage were excluded.MethodsPhysicians in generalist specialties and advanced practitioners with ≥90% of Part B claims for NH care were considered NH specialists. Residents were assigned to NH specialists vs non-NH specialists based on plurality of Part D claims submitted for that resident. Any PHM use (defined using the Beers Criteria) and the proportion of NH days on a PHM were modeled using generalized estimating equations. Models included resident demographics, clinical characteristics, cognitive and functional status, behavioral assessments, and facility characteristics.ResultsOf the 54,713 residents in the sample, 27.9% were managed by an NH specialist and 72.1% by a non-NH specialist. There was no statistically significant difference in any PHM use [odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.02, P = .23]. There were lower odds of prolonged PHM use (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94, P < .001, for PHM use on >75% vs >0%-<25% of NH days) for NH specialists vs non-NH specialists.Conclusions and ImplicationsAlthough the use of PHMs among NH residents with ADRD managed by NH specialists was not lower, they were less likely to receive PHMs over longer periods of time. Future work should evaluate the underlying causes of these differences to inform interventions to improve prescribing for NH residents.