Providing Palliative Care to Patients Throughout the State of Indiana from a Centralized Virtual Palliative Care Hub

BackgroundAccess to palliative care clinicians is a limited resource. Expanding the reach of existing palliative care expertise by utilizing virtual care is one strategy to reach areas that lack access. We delivered virtual services through a centralized hub across multiple health settings and tracked outcomes.MethodsThrough a centralized virtual palliative care hub based in an urban academic health center, access to specialty palliative care was offered across homes, critical access hospitals (CAHs), and extended care facilities (ECFs) in the state of Indiana. Webpage-based platforms were used, and hardware included a cart on wheels for rural hospital sites. Data specific to palliative care were monitored for each encounter.ResultsOver one year, 372 patients were seen for virtual palliative care consultations, of whom 275 (73.9%) were seen in the outpatient setting (where the patient was at home or in an ECF) and 97 (26.1%) were inpatient visits performed in CAHs. Visits occurred with patients from almost all counties in Indiana. Advance directives were established for 286 (76.9%) patients seen, and 107 (28.8%) patients were referred to hospice.ConclusionSpecialty palliative care is a limited resource that has been further constrained by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our experience demonstrates that centralized virtual hub-based palliative care can be leveraged to provide effective, patient-centered, and compassionate care in regions without a specialist and has the potential to improve access to specialty palliative care.     

The Association of Long-Term Opioid Use With Health Care and Home Care Service Use Among Aged Home Care Clients

ObjectivesTo compare health care and home care service utilization, mortality, and long-term care admissions between long-term opioid users and nonusers among aged home care clients.DesignA retrospective cohort study based on the Resident Assessment Instrument–Home Care (RAI-HC) assessments and electronic medical records.Setting and ParticipantsThe study sample included all regular home care clients aged ≥65 years (n = 2475), of whom 220 were long-term opioid users, in one city in Finland (population base 222,000 inhabitants).MethodsHealth care utilization, mortality, and long-term care admissions over a 1-year follow-up were recorded from electronic medical records, and home care service use from the RAI-HC. Negative binomial and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for several socioeconomic and health characteristics, were used to analyze the associations between opioid use and health and home care service use.ResultsCompared with nonusers, long-term opioid users had more outpatient consultations (incidence rate ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.08−1.48), home visits (1.23; 1.01−1.49), phone contacts (1.38; 1.13−1.68), and consultations without a patient attending a practice (1.22; 1.04−1.43) after adjustments. A greater proportion of long-term opioid users than nonusers had at least 1 hospitalization (49% vs 41%) but the number of inpatient days did not differ after adjustments. The home care nurses’ median work hours per week were 4.3 (Q₁-Q₃ 1.5−7.7) among opioid users and 2.8 (1.0−6.1) among nonusers. Mortality and long-term care admissions were not associated with opioid use.Conclusions and ImplicationsLong-term opioid use in home care clients is associated with increased health care utilization regardless of the severity of pain and other sociodemographic and health characteristics. This may indicate the inability of health care organizations to produce alternative treatment strategies for pain management when opioids do not meet patients’ needs. The exact reasons for opioid users’ greater health care utilization should be examined in future.     

Risk of Rehospitalization or Emergency Department Visit is Significantly Higher for Patients who Receive Their First Home Health Care Nursing Visit Later than 2 Days After Hospital Discharge

ObjectivesThis study explored the association between the timing of the first home health care nursing visits (start-of-care visit) and 30-day rehospitalization or emergency department (ED) visits among patients discharged from hospitals.DesignOur cross-sectional study used data from 1 large, urban home health care agency in the northeastern United States.Setting/ParticipantsWe analyzed data for 49,141 home health care episodes pertaining to 45,390 unique patients who were admitted to the agency following hospital discharge during 2019.MethodsWe conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine the association between start-of-care delays and 30-day hospitalizations and ED visits, adjusting for patients’ age, race/ethnicity, gender, insurance type, and clinical and functional status. We defined delays in start-of-care as a first nursing home health care visit that occurred more than 2 full days after the hospital discharge date.ResultsDuring the study period, we identified 16,251 start-of-care delays (34% of home health care episodes), with 14% of episodes resulting in 30-day rehospitalization and ED visits. Delayed episodes had 12% higher odds of rehospitalization or ED visit (OR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.06–1.18) compared with episodes with timely care.Conclusions and ImplicationsThe findings suggest that timely start-of-care home health care nursing visit is associated with reduced rehospitalization and ED use among patients discharged from hospitals. With more than 6 million patients who receive home health care services across the United States, there are significant opportunities to improve timely care delivery to patients and improve clinical outcomes.     

Factors Associated with Timing of the Start-of-Care Nursing Visits in Home Health Care

ObjectivesHome health care patients have critical needs requiring timely care following hospital discharge. Although Medicare requires timely start-of-care nursing visits, a significant portion of home health care patients wait longer than 2 days for the first visit. No previous studies investigated the pattern of start-of-care visits or factors associated with their timing. This study's purpose was to examine variation in timing of start-of-care visits and characterize patients with visits later than 2 days postdischarge.DesignRetrospective cohort study.Setting/participantsPatients admitted to a large, Northeastern US, urban home health care organization during 2019. The study included 48,497 home care episodes for 45,390 individual patients.MeasurementWe calculated time to start of care from hospital discharge for 2 patient groups: those seen within 2 days vs those seen >2 days postdischarge. We examined patient factors, hospital discharge factors, and timing of start of care using multivariate logistic regression.ResultsOf 48,497 episodes, 16,251 (33.5%) had a start-of-care nursing visit >2 days after discharge. Increased odds of this time frame were associated with being black or Hispanic and having solely Medicaid insurance. Odds were highest for patients discharged on Fridays, Saturdays, and Mondays. Factors associated with visits within 2 days included surgical wound presence, urinary catheter, pain, 5 or more medications, and intravenous or infusion therapies at home.Conclusions and ImplicationsFindings provide the first publication of clinical and demographic characteristics associated with home health care start-of-care timing and its variation. Further examination is needed, and adjustments to staff scheduling and improved information transfer are 2 suggested interventions to decrease variation.     

A Systematic Review of Nursing Home Palliative Care Interventions: Characteristics and Outcomes

BackgroundDespite recommendations to integrate palliative care into nursing home care, little is known about the most effective ways to meet this goal.ObjectiveTo examine the characteristics and effectiveness of nursing home interventions that incorporated multiple palliative care domains (eg, physical aspects of care—symptom management, and ethical aspects—advance care planning).DesignSystematic review.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library's CENTRAL from inception through January 2019. We included all randomized and nonrandomized trials that compared palliative care to usual care and an active comparator. We assessed the type of intervention, outcomes, and the risk of bias.ResultsWe screened 1167 records for eligibility and included 13 articles. Most interventions focused on staff education and training strategies and on implementing a palliative care team. Many interventions integrated advance care planning initiatives into the intervention. We found that palliative care interventions in nursing homes may enhance palliative care practices, including processes to assess and manage pain and symptoms. However, inconsistent outcomes and high or unclear risk of bias among most studies requires results to be interpreted with caution.Conclusions and ImplicationsHeterogeneity in methodology, findings, and study bias within the existing literature revealed limited evidence for nursing home palliative care interventions. Findings from a small group of diverse clinical trials suggest that interventions enhanced nursing home palliative care and improved symptom assessment and management processes.     

Frailty Predicts Increased Health Care Utilization Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study in China

ObjectivesFrailty, a multidimensional syndrome characterized by vulnerability to stressors, is an emerging public health priority with high prevalence in older adults. Frailty has been identified to predictive negative health outcomes, yet quantified evidence regarding its effect on health care systems is scarce. This study examines how frailty affects health care utilization, and explores whether these associations varied by gender.DesignCohort study with a 2-year follow-up.Settingand Participants: Data were derived from 2 waves (2011 and 2013) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, and 3119 community-dwelling participants aged ≥60 years were analyzed.MethodsFrailty was assessed by a validated frailty phenotype scale, and measures for health care utilization were self-reported. Panel data approach of mixed-effects regression models was used to examine the associations.ResultsLongitudinal results demonstrated that compared with robustness, prefrailty and frailty were both significantly associated with increased likelihood of outpatient visit, inpatient visit, and inpatient length of stay, even after adjusting for multimorbidity in multivariate analyses (all P < .05). Every 1-component increase in frailty was also found to significantly increase the risk for health care utilization [any outpatient visit: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–1.48; number of outpatient visits: adjusted incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.18–1.53; any inpatient visit: adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22–1.71; number of inpatient visits: adjusted IRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.62; inpatient length of stay: adjusted IRR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18–1.92]. The preceding associations were similarly observed irrespective of gender.Conclusions and ImplicationsFrailty is a significant predictor for increased health care utilization among community-dwelling older adults. These findings have important implications for routine clinical practice and public health investment. Early screening and intervention for potentially modifiable frailty could translate into considerable savings for households and health care systems.     

Educating Dutch General Practitioners in Dementia Advance Care Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectivesAdvance care planning (ACP) is seldom initiated with people with dementia (PWD) and mainly focuses on medical end-of-life decisions. We studied the effects of an educational intervention for general practitioners (GPs) aimed at initiating and optimizing ACP, with a focus on discussing medical and nonmedical preferences of future care.DesignA single-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial.Setting and participantsIn 2016, 38 Dutch GPs (all from different practices) completed the study. They recruited 140 PWD, aged ≥65 years at any stage and with any type of dementia, from their practice.MethodsIntervention group GPs were trained in ACP, including shared decision-making and role-playing exercises. Control group GPs provided usual care. The primary outcome was ACP initiation: the proportion of PWD that had at least 1 ACP conversation documented in their medical file. Key secondary outcomes were the number of medical (ie, resuscitation, hospital admission) and nonmedical (ie, activities, social contacts) preferences discussed. At the 6-month follow-up, subjects' medical records were analyzed using random effect logistics and linear models with correction for GP clustering.Results38 GP clusters (19 intervention; 19 control) included 140 PWD (intervention 73; control 67). Four PWD (2.9%) dropped out on the primary and key secondary outcomes. After 6 months, intervention group GPs initiated ACP with 35 PWD (49.3%), and control group GPs initiated ACP with 9 PWD (13.9%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.99; P = .002]. Intervention group GPs discussed 0.8 more medical [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3, 1.3; P = .003] and 1.5 more nonmedical (95% CI 0.8, 2.3; P < .001) preferences per person with dementia than control group GPs.Conclusions and ImplicationsOur educational intervention increased ACP initiation, and the number of nonmedical and medical preferences discussed. This intervention has the potential to better align future care of PWD with their preferences but because of the short follow-up, the GPs' long-term adoption remains unknown.     

Impacts of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Care Pathway on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: A Matched Multiple Control Cohort Study in Saskatchewan,Canada

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the real-world impacts of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care pathway program on healthcare utilization and costs in Saskatchewan, Canada.MethodsA difference-in-differences evaluation of a real-life deployment of a COPD care pathway, using patient-level administrative health data in Saskatchewan, was conducted. The intervention group (n = 759) included adults (35+ years) with spirometry-confirmed COPD diagnosis recruited into the care pathway program in Regina between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. The 2 control groups comprised adults (35+ years) with COPD who lived in Saskatoon during the same period (n = 759) or Regina between April 1, 2015 and March 31, 2016 (n = 759) who did not participate in the care pathway.ResultsCompared with the individuals in the Saskatoon control groups, individuals in the COPD care pathway group had shorter inpatient hospital length of stay (average treatment effect on the treated [ATT] −0.46, 95% CI −0.88 to −0.04) but a higher number of general practitioner visits (ATT 1.46, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.79) and specialist physician visits (ATT 0.84, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.07). Regarding healthcare costs, individuals in the care pathway group had higher COPD-related specialist visit costs (ATT $81.70, 95% CI $59.45 to $103.96) but lower COPD-related outpatient drug dispensation costs (ATT −$4.81, 95% CI −$9.34 to −$0.27).ConclusionsThe care pathway reduced inpatient hospital length of stay, but increased general practitioner and specialist physician visits for COPD-related services within the first year of implementation.     

Effects of Palliative Care for Progressive Neurologic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesTo determine the association of palliative care for progressive neurologic diseases with patient- and caregiver-centered outcomes.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies, including pilot studies.Setting and ParticipantsAdults with progressive neurologic diseases (dementia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, motor neuron disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy) and their caregivers.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL PLUS, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PubMed were searched from inception to September 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. Narrative synthesis was conducted. Patient quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, caregiver burden, and satisfaction with care were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.ResultsFifteen trials provided data on 3431 patients (mean age, 73.9 years). Compared with usual care, palliative care was statistically significantly associated with lower symptom burden [standardized mean difference (SMD), ?0.34 (95% Cl, ?0.59 to ?0.09)] and higher caregiver satisfaction [SMD, 0.41 (95% Cl, 0.12 to 0.71)] and patient satisfaction [SMD, 0.43 (95% Cl, ?0.01 to 0.87)]. However, the associations were not significant after excluding studies with high risk of bias. Insignificant associations of palliative care with caregiver burden [SMD, ?0.09 (95% Cl, ?0.21 to 0.03)] and patient QoL [SMD, 0.19 (95% Cl, ?0.07 to 0.44)] were observed.Conclusions and ImplicationsPalliative care is likely to improve symptom burden and satisfaction with care among patients with progressive neurologic diseases and their caregivers, while its effects on QoL and caregiver burden remains inconclusive. Specific intervention components including interdisciplinary team, palliative care physicians, home visits, and spiritual care appeared to be associated with increased effects on improving palliative outcomes. More rigorous designed studies are warranted to examine the effects of neuropalliative care, effective intervention components, optimal timing, and symptom triggers of palliative care referrals.     

Mortality,Health Care Use,and Costs of Clostridioides difficile Infections in Older Adults

ObjectivesEstimate mortality, cost, and health care resource utilization for Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who suffered a primary Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) episode only or any recurrent CDI, and understand how outcomes covary with death.DesignRetrospective observational claims analysis.Setting and ParticipantsPatients aged ≥65 years who had an inpatient or outpatient CDI diagnosis claim to Medicare and continuous enrollment in Medicare parts A, B, and D during the 12-month pre- and post-index periods.MethodsUsing 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data for 2009–2017, primary (pCDI, n = 345,893) and recurrent (rCDI: n = 151,596) CDI episodes were identified. Demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality, health care resource utilization, and costs (per patient per month) were summarized for 12 months before and up to 12 months after episode start. Regression models were estimated for hospitalization risk, hospital length of stay (LOS), and cost to adjust for comorbidities.ResultsCDI-associated deaths were almost 10 times higher after recurrent CDI (25.4%) than primary CDI (2.7%). Compared with survivors, decedents were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and were more likely Black. Adjusting for comorbidities, during follow-up, decedents had higher hospitalization rates [pCDI: odds ratio (OR) = 1.83, P < .001; rCDI: OR = 2.58, P < .001], and recurrent CDI decedents had more intensive care unit use (OR = 2.34, P < .001) compared with survivors. Decedents also had a longer length of stay (pCDI: +3.2 days, P < .001; rCDI: +2.6 days, P < .001), and higher total cost (pCDI: +303%, P < .001; rCDI: +297%, P < .001).Conclusions and ImplicationsCDI is an important contributing diagnosis to all-cause mortality, particularly for recurrences. Prior to death, older Medicare beneficiaries who experienced CDI received longer, more intensive, and more costly care compared with survivors. Clinicians should be particularly attentive to prevention, identification, and appropriate treatment of CDI in older adults. Better treatments to reduce primary C difficile infection and recurrences in this vulnerable population can lower both mortality and economic burden.     

Incomplete Home Health Care Referral After Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries

ObjectivesPatients who are referred to home health care after an acute care hospitalization may not receive home health care, resulting in incomplete home health referrals. This study examines the prevalence of incomplete referrals to home health, defined as not receiving home health care within 7 days after an initial hospital discharge, and investigates the relationship between home health referral completion and patient outcomes.DesignRetrospective cohort study.Setting and ParticipantsMedicare beneficiaries who are discharged from short-term acute care hospitals between October 2015 and December 2016 with a discharge status code on the hospital claim indicating home health care.MethodsPatient characteristics and outcomes were compared between Medicare beneficiaries with complete and incomplete home health referrals after hospital discharge. The outcomes included mortality, readmission rate, and total spending over a 1-year episode following hospitalization. These outcomes were risk-adjusted using patient demographic, socioeconomic, clinical characteristic, hospital characteristic, and state fixed effects.ResultsApproximately 29% of the 724,700 hospitalizations in the analytic dataset had incomplete home health referrals after discharge. The rate of incomplete home health referrals varied among clinical conditions, ranging from 17% among joint/musculoskeletal patients and 38% among digestive/endocrine patients. Risk-adjusted 1-year mortality and readmission rates were 1.4 and 2.4 percentage points lower and total spending was $1053 higher among patients with complete home health referrals as compared with those with incomplete home health referrals after hospital discharge.Conclusions and ImplicationsThe analysis revealed that almost 1 in 3 patients discharged from a hospital with a discharge status of home health does not receive home health care. In addition, complete home health referrals are associated with lower mortality and readmission rates and higher spending. As home health care utilization increases, policymakers should pay attention to the tradeoff between quality and cost when implementing alternative policies and payment models.     

Social determinants of health,emergency department utilization,and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities

BackgroundPeople with intellectual and developmental disabilities’ (IDD’s) health is largely dependent on the government services they receive. Medicaid managed care has emerged as one mechanism used to provide services to people with disabilities in an attempt to reduce costs. In managed care, there has been an emphasis on reducing emergency department visits and hospital admissions in an effort to reduce expenditures.ObjectiveThe purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the impact social determinants of health –“conditions in the environments in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks” (n.p.)¹ – had on the emergency department utilization of people with IDD.MethodsWe had the following research question: what is the relationship between social determinants and emergency department utilization (visits) among adults with IDD? To explore this research question, a negative binomial regression analysis was used with secondary social determinant outcomes data (from Personal Outcome Measures®) and emergency department visit data from a random sample of 251 people with IDD. We also examined relationships with participants’ demographics.ResultsOur findings revealed for every one unit increase in the number of social determinant outcomes present, there was a 7.97% decrease in emergency department visits. There were also significant relationships between emergency department visits, and complex support needs, intellectual disability level, primary communication method, and residence type.ConclusionsSocial determinants are critical to promote the quality of life and health equity of people with IDD.     

More counselling for end-of-life decisions by GPs with own advance directives: A postal survey among German general practitioners

Background: Although general practitioners (GPs) are among the preferred contact persons for discussing end-of-life issues including advance directives (ADs), there is little data on how GPs manage such consultations.

Objectives: This postal survey asked German GPs about their counselling for end-of-life decisions.

Methods: In 2015, a two-sided questionnaire was mailed to 959 GPs. GPs were asked for details of their consultations on ADs: frequency, duration, template use, and whether they have own ADs. Statistical analysis evaluated physician characteristics associated with an above-average number of consultations on AD.

Results: The participation rate was 50.3% (n?=?482), 70.5% of the GPs were male; the average age was 54 years. GPs had an average of 18 years of professional experience, and 61.4% serve more than 900 patients per three months. Most (96.9%) GPs perform consultations on living wills (LW) and/or powers of attorney (PA), mainly in selected patients (72.3%). More than 20 consultations each on LWs and PAs are performed by 60% and 50% of GPs, respectively. The estimated mean duration of consultations was 21?min for LWs and 16?min for PAs. Predefined templates were used in 72% of the GPs, 50% of GPs had their ADs. A statistical model showed that GPs with ADs and/or a qualification in palliative medicine were more likely to counsel ≥20 patients per year for each document.

Conclusion: The study confirmed that nearly all German GPs surveyed provide counselling on ADs. Physicians with ADs counsel more frequently than those without such documents.     

Telehealth Palliative Care in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review

ObjectivesMany adults older than 65 spend time in a nursing home (NH) at the end of life where specialist palliative care is limited. However, telehealth may improve access to palliative care services. A review of the literature was conducted to synthesize the evidence for telehealth palliative care in NHs to provide recommendations for practice, research, and policy.DesignJoanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews frameworks were used to guide this literature review.Settings and ParticipantsReviewed articles focused on residents in NHs with telehealth palliative care interventionists operating remotely. Participants included NH residents, care partner(s), and NH staff/clinicians.MethodsWe searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (WileyOnline), Scopus (Elsevier), CINHAL (EBSCOhost), Trip PRO, and Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest) in June 2021, with an update in January 2022. We included observational and qualitative studies, clinical trials, quality improvement projects, and case and clinical reports that self-identified as telehealth palliative care for NH residents.ResultsThe review yielded 11 eligible articles published in the United States and internationally from 2008 to 2020. Articles described live video as the preferred telehealth delivery modality with goals of care and physical aspects of care being most commonly addressed. Findings in the articles focused on 5 patient and family-centered outcomes: symptom management, quality of life, advance care planning, health care use, and evaluation of care. Consistent benefits of telehealth palliative care included increased documentation of goals of care and decrease in acute care use. Disadvantages included technological difficulties and increased NH financial burden.Conclusions and ImplicationsAlthough limited in scope and quality, the current evidence for telehealth palliative care interventions shows promise for improving quality and outcomes of serious illness care in NHs. Future empirical studies should focus on intervention effectiveness, implementation outcomes (eg, managing technology), stakeholders’ experience, and costs.     

Systematic Review of Rural and Urban Differences in Care Provided by Home Health Agencies in the United States

ObjectiveHome health care agencies (HHAs) are skilled care providers for Medicare home health beneficiaries in the United States. Rural HHAs face different challenges from their urban counterparts in delivering care (eg, longer distances to travel to patient homes leading to higher fuel/travel costs and fewer number of visits in a day, impacting the quality of home health care for rural beneficiaries). We review evidence on differences in care outcomes provided by urban and rural HHAs.DesignSystematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality appraisal.SettingCare provided by urban and rural HHAs.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for English-language peer-reviewed articles after 2010 on differences in urban and rural care provided by U.S. HHAs. We screened 876 studies, conducted full-text abstraction and NOS quality review on 36 articles and excluded 2 for poor study quality.ResultsTwelve studies were included; 7 focused on patient-level analyses and 5 were HHA-level. Nine studies were cross-sectional and 3 used cohorts. Urban and rural differences were measured primarily using a binary variable. All studies controlled for agency-level characteristics, and two-thirds also controlled for patient characteristics. Rural beneficiaries, compared with urban, had lower home health care utilization (4 of 5 studies) and fewer visits for physical therapy and/or rehabilitation (3 of 5 studies). Rural agencies had lower quality of HHA services (3 of 4 studies). Rural patients, compared with urban, visited the emergency room more often (2 of 2 studies) and were more likely to be hospitalized (2 of 2 studies), whereas urban patients with heart failure were more likely to have 30-day preventable hospitalizations (1 study).Conclusion and ImplicationsThis review highlights similar urban/rural disparities in home health care quality and utilization as identified in previous decades. Variables used to measure the access to and quality of care by HHAs varied, so consensus was limited. Articles that used more granular measures of rurality (rather than binary measures) revealed additional differences. These findings point to the need for consistent and refined measures of rurality in studies examining urban and rural differences in care from HHAs.     

Cost-Effectiveness in Perioperative Care: Application of Markov Modeling to Pathways of Perioperative Care

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the application of cost-effectiveness modeling to redesign of perioperative care pathways, from a hospital perspective.MethodsA Markov cost-effectiveness model of patient transition between care locations, each with different characteristics and cost, was developed. Inputs were derived from clinical trials piloting a preoperative call center and a postoperative medium-acuity care unit. The effect chosen was days at home (DAH) after surgery, reflecting quality of in-hospital care, acknowledged financially by fundholders, and relevant to consumers. Cost was from the hospital’s perspective. A model cycle time of 4 hours for 30 days reflected relevant timelines and costs.ResultsA Markov model was successfully created, accounting for the care locations in the 2 pathways as model states and accounting for consequences and costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis allowed the calculation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing these pathways, providing a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ?$427 per additional DAH, where incremental costs and DAH were ?$644 and +1.51, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested the new pathway had a 61% probability of reduced costs and a 74% probability of increased DAH and a 58% probability this pathway was dominant. Tornado analysis revealed the major contributor to increased costs as intensive care unit stay and the major contributor to decreased costs as ward stay. For the new pathway, the probability of transfer from ward to home and the probability of staying at home had the greatest impact on DAH.ConclusionsThese data suggest Markov modeling may be a useful tool for the cost-effectiveness analysis of initiatives in perioperative care.