Conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

In the last few years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an alternative procedure in patients with severe aortic stenosis and high risk for surgical aortic replacement. Due to the anatomic correlation between aortic valve structure and conduction system of the heart, one of the most common complications after TAVI is conduction system disturbances which including bundle branch block, complete heart block and need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Although these disturbances are usually not lethal, they may have a great influence on patients’ state and long term-survival. Several risk factors for conduction disturbances have been identified which including age, anatomy of the heart, periprocedural factors, type of implanted valve, preexisting abnormalities and comorbidities. As this technique becomes more familiar to physicians, patients should be carefully screened for risk factors for the development of conduction abnormalities after TAVI in order to provide effective prevention and proper treatment.     

Recent developments and controversies in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Interventional cardiology has been revolutionised by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), which has become established as the benchmark treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Increased procedural familiarity and progression in device technology has enabled improvements to be made in complication rates, which have led to a commensurate expansion in the use of TAVI; it is now a viable alternative to AVR in patients at intermediate surgical risk, and has been used in cohorts such as those with bicuspid aortic valves or pure, severe aortic regurgitation. Given the rapid expansion in the use of TAVI, including cohorts of younger patients with fewer co‐morbidities, attention must be paid to further reducing remaining complications, such as cardiac tamponade or stroke. To this end, novel techniques and devices have been devised and trialled, with varying levels of success. Furthermore, significant work has gone into refining the technique with exploration of alternative imaging modalities, as well as alternative access routes to provide greater options for patients with challenging vascular anatomy. Whilst significant progress has been made with TAVI, areas of uncertainty remain such as the management of concomitant coronary artery disease and the optimum post‐procedure antiplatelet regimen. As such, research in this field continues apace, and is likely to continue as use of TAVI becomes more widespread. This review provides a summary of the existing evidence, as well as an overview of recent developments and contentious issues in the field of TAVI.     

Defective recovery of QT dispersion following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: frequency, predictors and prognosis

Background Corrected QT dispersion (cQTD) has been correlated with non-uniform ventricular repolarisation and increased mortality. In patients with aortic stenosis, cQTD has been shown improved after surgical valve replacement, but the effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are unknown. Therefore, we sought to explore the frequency, predictors and prognostic effects of defective cQTD recovery at 6 months after TAVI. Methods A total of 222 patients underwent TAVI with the Medtronic-CoreValve System between November 2005 and January 2012. Patients who were on classⅠor Ⅲ antiarrhythmics or on chronic haemodialysis or who developed atrial fibrillation, a new bundle branch block or became pacemaker dependent after TAVI were excluded. As a result, pre-, post- and follow-up ECG (median: 6 months) analysis was available in 45 eligible patients. Defective cQTD recovery was defined as any progression beyond the baseline cQTD at 6 months. Results In the 45 patients, the mean cQTD was 47 ± 23 ms at baseline, 45 ± 17 ms immediately after TAVI and 40 ± 16 ms at 6 months (15% reduction, P = 0.049). Compared to baseline, cQTD at 6 months was improved in 60% of the patients whereas defective cQTD recovery was present in 40%. cQTD increase immediately after TAVI was an independent predictor of defective cQTD recovery at 6 months (per 10 ms increase; OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.15–3.12). By univariable analysis, defective cQTD recovery was associated with late mortality (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.05–2.17). Conclusions Despite a gradual reduction of cQTD after TAVI, 40% of the patients had defective recovery at 6 months which was associated with late mortality. More detailed ECG analysis after TAVI may help to avoid late death.     

Permanent pacemaker implantation late after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

1. Download : Download high-res image (163KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis

Aim

To assess outcome of TAVI in high risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): A heart-warming adventure

The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) spearheaded by our group has been a great adventure since we validated the concept in the early 1990s in aortic stenosis (AS) postmortem studies. We first tested prototypes in animal models before performing the daring first-in-man implantation in 2002. Prospective compassionate use series followed, accompanied by ongoing technological innovation of devices and of delivery systems. High surgical risk patients were enrolled in feasibility studies, which led to the Conformité Européenne (CE) mark being granted in 2007. Data from post-marketing registries involving thousands of patients have shown remarkable results and increasingly smaller complication rates, as a result of growing experience and improved technology. Survival and quality of life results from the landmark randomized PARTNER Edwards SAPIEN study have confirmed the important place of TAVI in non-operable and high surgical risk patients. To date, more than 50,000 patients have benefited from TAVI worldwide. TAVI is now recommended in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines, and by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for the treatment of AS patients who are not suitable or at high risk for surgery, as assessed by a multidisciplinary heart team, and in whom a less invasive approach is favored. Multidisciplinary heart teams are critical in patient selection and in successful procedures. In future, TAVI may be extended to use in lower risk patients, although further clinical investigation is necessary. Just over 10 years after the first-in-man case, TAVI has quickly become an established AS treatment option.     

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on QT dispersion in patients with aortic stenosis

Background QT dispersion （QTd） is a predictor of ventricular arrhythmia. Ventricular arrhythmia is an important factor influencing morbidity and mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. Surgical aortic valve replacement reduced the QTd in this patients group. However, the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation （TAVI） on QTd in patients with aortic stenosis is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of TAVI on QTd in patients with aortic stenosis. Methods Patients with severe aortic stenosis, who were not candi-dates for surgical aortic valve replacement due to contraindications or high surgical risk, were included in the study. All patients underwent electrocardiographic and echocardiographic evaluation before, and at the 6th month after TAVI, computed QTd and left ventricular mass index （LVMI）. Results A total 30 patients were admitted to the study （mean age 83.2 ± 1.0 years, female 21 and male 9, mean valve area 0.7 ± 3 mm2）. Edwards SAPIEN heart valves, 23 mm （21 patients） and 26 mm （9 patients）, by the transfemoral approach were used in the TAVI procedures. All TAVI procedures were successful. Both QTd and LVMI at the 6th month after TAVI were significantly reduced com-pared with baseline values of QTd and LVMI before TAVI （73.8 ± 4 ms vs. 68 ± 2 ms, P=0.001 and 198 ± 51 g/m2 vs. 184 ± 40 g/m2, P=0.04, respectively）. There was a significant correlation between QTd and LVMI （r=0.646, P〈0.001）. Conclusions QTd, which malign ventricular arrhythmia marker, and LVMI were significantly reduced after TAVI procedure. TAVI may decrease the possibility of ventricu-lar arrhythmia in patients with aortic stenosis.     

国产自膨式经导管主动脉瓣膜置换术后严重传导损伤相关因素分析

目的 分析应用国产自膨式瓣膜行经导管主动脉瓣置换术（transcatheter aortic valve implantation,TAVR）后严重传导损伤的相关因素并评估其预测效能。方法 回顾性纳入2016年12月至2022年10月于我院应用国产自膨式主动脉瓣膜行TAVR患者84例,根据术后是否出现严重传导损伤分为正常组和传导损伤组,比较两组因素差异。分析并纳入回归模型,绘制受试者工作曲线（receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC）,计算预测效能并评估效能差异。结果 左室流出道（Left ventricular outflow tract,LVOT）面积（正常组vs.传导损伤组：478.70±139.84mm2 vs. 368.97±134.97 mm2, P=0.002）、LVOT面积/瓣环面积（104.41±15.99% vs. 87.05±13.59%, P<0.001）、室间隔膜部长度(8.27±2.74mm vs. 6.45±2.92mm, P=0.005)、室间隔膜部长度和植入深度的差值（membranous septum minus implantation depth, ΔMSID）（3.53±3.73 vs. 0.83±3.45mm, P=0.003）存在显著统计学差异。多因素logistic回归分析显示,LVOT面积/瓣环面积（OR值：0.917[0.975-0.960]每增加1%, P=0.004）、ΔMSID（OR值：0.660[0.515-0.846] 每增加1mm, P=0.001）是TAVR术后严重传导损伤的独立危险因素。ROC曲线示LVOT面积/瓣环面积、ΔMSID的曲线下面积分别为 0.792[0.690-0.873]、0.768[0.663-0.853],联合两因素的曲线下面积为0.908[0.825-0.920]。DeLong检验显示单因素与联合指标的预测存在统计学差异（vs. LVOT面积/瓣环面积 P=0.045;vs. ΔMSID P=0.006）。结论 LVOT面积/瓣环面积、ΔMSID是TAVR术后出现严重传导损伤的独立危险因素,可用于预测术后新发传导损伤的发生,联合指标较单因素预测效能更高。     

Future perspectives in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) constitutes a relatively new treatment option for the patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Evidence from registries and randomized control trials has underscored the value of this treatment in inoperable and high risk populations, while new developments in valve technology and TAVR enabling devices have reduced the risk of complications, simplified the procedure, and broadened the applications of this therapy. The initial promising clinical results and the potential of an effective less invasive treatment of aortic stenosis has not only created high expectations but also the need to address the pitfalls of TAVR technology. The evolving knowledge concerning the groups of patients who would benefit from this treatment, the limited long term follow-up data, the concerns about devices' long term durability, and the severity of complications remain important caveats which restrict the widespread clinical adoption of TAVR. The aim of this review article is to present the recent advances, highlight the limitations of TAVR technology, and discuss the future perspectives in this rapidly evolving field.     

Updates on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Techniques,complications, outcome,and prognosis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) initially emerged as a therapeutic option for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Advancement in technologies since the first era of TAVRs, experience from previous obstacles, and lessons learned from complications have allowed the evolution of this procedure to the current state. This review focuses on the updates on the most current devices, complications, and outcomes of TAVR.     

Impact of clinical and procedural factors upon C reactive protein dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIM: To determine the effect of procedural and clinical factors upon C reactive protein(CRP) dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI).METHODS: Two hundred and eight consecutive patients that underwent transfemoral TAVI at two hospitals(Imperial, College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy) were included. Daily venous plasma CRP levels were measured for up to 7 d following the procedure(or up to discharge). Procedural factors and 30-d safety outcomes according tothe Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definition were collected. RESULTS: Following TAVI, CRP significantly increased reaching a peak on day 3 of 87.6 ± 5.5 mg/d L, P 0.001. Patients who developed clinical signs and symptoms of sepsis had significantly increased levels of CRP(P 0.001). The presence of diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly higher peak CRP level at day 3(78.4 ± 3.2 vs 92.2 ± 4.4, P 0.001). There was no difference in peak CRP release following balloonexpandable or self-expandable TAVI implantation(94.8 ± 9.1 vs 81.9 ± 6.9, P = 0.34) or if post-dilatation was required(86.9 ± 6.3 vs 96.6 ± 5.3, P = 0.42), however, when pre-TAVI balloon aortic valvuloplasty was performed this resulted in a significant increase in the peak CRP(110.1 ± 8.9 vs 51.6 ± 3.7, P 0.001). The development of a major vascular complication did result in a significantly increased maximal CRP release(153.7 ± 11.9 vs 83.3 ± 7.4, P = 0.02) and there was a trend toward a higher peak CRP following major/lifethreatening bleeding(113.2 ± 9.3 vs 82.7 ± 7.5, P = 0.12) although this did not reach statistical significance. CRP was not found to be a predictor of 30-d mortality on univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Careful attention should be paid to baseline clinical characteristics and procedural factors when interpreting CRP following TAVI to determine their future management.     

Validation of methods for effective orifice area measurement of prosthetic valves by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography following transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation

BackgroundThe effective orifice area (EOA) is utilized to characterize the hemodynamic performance of the transcatheter heart valve (THV). However, there is no consensus on EOA measurement of self-expanding THV. We aimed to compare two echocardiographic methods for EOA measurement following transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation.MethodsEOA was calculated according to the continuity equation. Two methods were constructed. In Method 1 and Method 2, the left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) was measured at the entry of the prosthesis (from trailing-to-leading edge) and proximal to the prosthetic valve leaflets (from trailing-to- leading edge), respectively. The velocity-time integral (VTI) of the LVOT (VTI_LVOT) was recorded by pulsed-wave Doppler (PW) from apical windows. The region of the PW sampling should match that of the LVOTd measurement with precise localization. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) and VTI of THV was measured by Continuous wave Doppler.ResultsA total of 113 consecutive patients were recruited. The mean age was 77.2 ± 5.5 years, and 72 patients (63.7%) were male. EOA₁ with the use of Method 1 was larger than EOA₂ (1.56 ± 0.39 cm² vs. 1.48 ± 0.41 cm², P = 0.001). MG correlated better with the indexed EOA₁ (EOAI₁) (r = -0.701, P < 0.001) than EOAI₂ (r = -0.645, P < 0.001). According to EOAI (EOAI ≤ 0.65 cm²/m², respectively), the proportion of sever prosthesis-patient mismatch with the use of EOA₁ was lower than EOA₂ (12.4% vs. 21.2%, P < 0.05). Compared with EOA₂, EOA₁ had lower interobserver and intra-observer variability (intra: 0.5% ± 17% vs. 3.8% ± 22%, P < 0.001; inter: 1.0% ± 9% vs. 3.5% ± 11%, P < 0.001).ConclusionsFor transcatheter self-expanding valve EOA measurement, LVOTd should be measured in the entry of the prosthesis stent (from trailing-to-leading edge), and VTI_LVOT should match that of the LVOTd measurement with precise localization.     

经导管主动脉瓣置入手术在主动脉瓣狭窄合并二尖瓣反流治疗中的疗效分析

目的:分析经导管主动脉瓣置入术在主动脉瓣狭窄合并二尖瓣反流(MR)的疗效。方法:选取我院就诊的主动脉瓣狭窄合并MR流患者31例,所有患者均行经导管主动脉瓣置入术,按照患者的MR流严重程度分为A组(轻度)和B组(中度、重度)。比较两组的并发症发生率、术后1个月的LVEF、LVEDD、MR和NYHA分级,比较两组在术后1个月、3个月时的死亡率和生活质量。结果:两组的各并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组在术后1个月时的LVEF和日常生活能力量表(ADL)评分均明显高于B组(P<0.05);A组在术后1个月时的死亡率、LVEDD、MR和NYHA分级明显低于B组(P<0.05);两组患者在术后3个月时的死亡率和ADL评分均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经导管主动脉瓣置入手术可用于主动脉瓣狭窄合并不同程度MR流患者的治疗中,反流的严重程度对患者远期死亡率和生活质量恢复的影响较小。     

Clinical and prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIM: To study a cohort of consecutive patients under-going transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and compare the outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients vs patients in sinus rhythm (SR). METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in our hospital were included. The AF group comprised patients in AF at the time of TAVI or with history of AF, and were compared with the SR group. Procedural, echocardiographic and follow-up variables were compared. Likewise, the CHA 2 DS 2-VASC stroke risk score and HAS-BLED bleeding risk score and antithrombotic treatment at discharge in AF patients were compared with that in SR patients. RESULTS: From a total of 34 patients undergoing TAVI, 17 (50%) were allocated to the AF group, of whom 15 (88%) were under chronic oral anticoagulation. Patients in the AF group were similar to those in the SR group except for a trend (P = 0.07) for a higher logistic EuroSCORE (28% vs 19%), and a higher prevalence of hypertension (82% vs 53%) and chronic renal failure (17% vs 0%). Risk of both stroke and bleeding was high in the AF group (mean CHA 2 DS 2-VASC 4.3, mean HAS-BLED 2.9). In the AF group, treatment at discharge included chronic oral anticoagulation in all except one case, and in association with an antiplatelet drug in 57% of patients. During a mean follow-up of 11 mo (maximum 32), there were only two strokes, none of them during the peri-procedural period: one in the AF group at 30 mo and one in the SR group at 3 mo. There were no statistical differences in procedural success, and clinical outcome (survival at 1 year 81% vs 74% in AF and SR groups, respectively, P = NS). CONCLUSION: Patients in AF undergoing TAVI show a trend to a higher surgical risk. However, in our cohort, patients in AF did not have a higher stroke rate compared to the SR group, and the prognosis was similar in both groups.     

Acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence,predictors and clinical outcome

Background

Limited data exist on renal complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within a comprehensive program using different valves with transfemoral, transapical, and trans-subclavian approach.

Methods

Prospective single-center registry of 102 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI using both approved bioprostheses and different access routes. The main objective was to assess the incidence, predictors and the clinical impact of acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI was defined according to the valve academic research consortium (VARC) indications.

Results

Mean age was 83.7 ± 5.3 years, logistic EuroSCORE 22.6 ± 12.4%, and STS score 8.2 ± 4.1%. Chronic kidney disease at baseline was present in 87.3%. Periprocedural AKI developed in 42 patients (41.7%): 32.4% stage 1, 4.9% stage 2 and 3.9% stage 3. The incidence of AKI was 66.7% in transapical, 30.3% in transfemoral, and 50% in trans-subclavian procedures. The only independent predictor of AKI was transapical access, with a hazard ratio (HR) between 4.57 and 5.18 based on the model used. Cumulative 1-year survival was 88.2%. At Cox regression analysis, the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality was diabetes mellitus (HR 7.05, 95% CI 1.07–46.32; p = 0.042), whilst the independent predictors of 1-year death were baseline glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min (HR 5.74, 95% CI 1.42–23.26; p = 0.014) and post-procedural AKI 3 (HR 8.59, 95% CI 1.61–45.86, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

TAVI is associated with a high incidence of AKI. Although in the majority of the cases AKI is of mild entity and reversible, AKI 3 holds a strong negative impact on 1-year survival. The incidence of AKI is higher with transapical access.     

心房颤动患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后1年随访结果

目的:探讨经导管主动脉瓣植入（TAVI）术前合并心房颤动（房颤）是否会对患者的预后产生影响。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究。入选2016年5月至2020年11月于北部战区总医院住院并成功接受TAVI治疗且顺利出院的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者115例。根据入选患者是否合并房颤将其分为房颤组（21例）及非房颤组（94例）。随访纳...     

Oversizing, undersizing or just the right sizing for TAVI patients?

Background Postprocedural aortic regurgitations following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures remain an issue. Benefit of oversizing strategies to prevent them isn’t well established. We compared different level of oversizing in our cohort of consecutive patients to address if severe oversizing compared to normal sizing had an impact on post-procedural outcomes. Methods From January 2010 to August 2013, consecutive patients were referred for TAVI with preoperative Multislice-CT (MSCT) and the procedures were achieved using Edwards Sapien^? or Corevalve devices^?. Retrospectively, according to pre-procedural MSCT and the valve size, patients were classified into three groups: normal, moderate and severe oversizing; depending on the ratio between the prosthesis area and the annulus area indexed and measured on MSCT. Main endpoint was mid-term mortality and secondary endpoints were the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) endpoints. Results Two hundred and sixty eight patients had a MSCT and underwent TAVI procedure, with mainly Corevalve^?. While all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were similar in all groups, post-procedural new pacemaker (PM) implantation rate was significantly higher in the severe oversizing group (P = 0.03), while we observed more in-hospital congestive heart-failure (P = 0.02) in the normal sizing group. There was a trend toward more moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR) in the normal sizing group (P = 0.07). Conclusions Despite a higher rate of PM implantation, oversizing based on this ratio reduces aortic leak with lower rates of post-procedural complications and a similar mid-term survival.