Evaluation of community pharmacy service mix: evidence from the 2004 National Pharmacist Workforce Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the mix of pharmacy services being offered in different types of community pharmacy practices and to identify factors associated with a community pharmacy offering pharmacy services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community pharmacies (independent, chain, mass merchandiser, and supermarket pharmacies). PARTICIPANTS: Pharmacists practicing full-time or part-time who worked in community pharmacies and responded to the 2004 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey. INTERVENTION: Mailed survey from the 2004 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey, which included core content questions for all sampled pharmacists and supplemental surveys that included workplace questions for a selected subsample of pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type and frequency of pharmacy services being offered in a community pharmacy, including dispensing and product-related services (e.g., specialty compounding), and pharmacist care services (e.g., immunizations, smoking cessation, health screening, medication therapy management, wellness screening, nutritional support, and disease management services). RESULTS: Four pharmacist care services were reported as being offered at more than 10% of community pharmacy practices: immunizations, smoking cessation, health screening, and diabetes management. The number of pharmacist care services offered at a community pharmacy was positively associated with having at least three pharmacists on duty, innovativeness of the pharmacy, status as an independent pharmacy, and status as a supermarket pharmacy. More than one half of the community pharmacy practices did not offer any of the eight pharmacist care services included in a pharmacy service index. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy services were reported at relatively few community pharmacies, and were associated with pharmacy innovativeness, pharmacist staffing levels, and pharmacy setting. Some community pharmacies are offering pharmacy services as part of their business strategy, while others are dedicated to dispensing services. Continued study of pharmacy service availability in community pharmacies is needed to improve our understanding of our capacity to deliver such services, including medication therapy management services.     

Pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of a statewide community pharmacy accreditation program

ObjectivesTo assess pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of participation in a community pharmacy accreditation program.SettingCommunity pharmacy practice in Wisconsin.Practice innovationThe Wisconsin Pharmacy Quality Collaborative (WPQC) is a network of pharmacies and pharmacists who provide standardized pharmacy services. WPQC is based on a unique set of quality-based best practices designed to improve patient safety in the medication use process. WPQC is supported by the statewide pharmacy organization, the Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin (PSW), which provides resources focused on implementation and engagement to support the success of WPQC-accredited pharmacies.Program evaluationPSW used a 24-question online survey to evaluate the degree of pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of the WPQC quality-based best practices.ResultsPharmacist-reported frequency and consistency of all quality-based best practices and services increased after WPQC accreditation (P < 0.05), with the exception of robotic dispensing systems, holding regular staff meetings for team communication, and providing incentives for recording quality-related events. In addition, quality-based best practices and WPQC services had a positive impact on pharmacist perceptions of their quality of patient care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, and patient relationships in WPQC-accredited pharmacies. The majority of pharmacies valued WPQC accreditation and shared positive comments about their experiences.ConclusionA community pharmacy accreditation program using standardized quality-based best practices can create and reinforce behavior change in the community pharmacy setting to positively affect patient care and medication safety. Research is needed to determine if there are actual behavior changes as a result of WPQC accreditation compared with pharmacies that have elected not to participate.     

Community pharmacy interventions to improve antibiotic stewardship and implications for pharmacy education: A narrative overview

BackgroundAntibiotic resistance is one of the world's most pressing public health problems, resulting in over 23,000 deaths per year. One of the main contributing factors to antimicrobial resistance is antibiotic misuse and overuse. Community pharmacists can play a role in reducing antibiotic resistance, since they are one of the most accessible healthcare professionals.ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to describe community pharmacy interventions and strategies to reduce antibiotic misuse and overuse and to discuss the implications for pharmacy training.MethodsA narrative overview strategy was employed to identify papers on antibiotic stewardship and the role of the community pharmacist. Our review examined potential stewardship strategies and interventions within community pharmacy practice that provide opportunities for pharmacists to engage or lead in the reduction of antimicrobial resistance.ResultsWe describe five promising community pharmacist-led intervention strategies: Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPAs), point-of-care (POC) testing, patient consultations, academic detailing and serving as an advocate for patients and other healthcare providersConclusionsThis review highlights topics that may warrant increased attention in pharmacy school curricula. Pharmacy schools may want to consider modifying their curricula to address the shifts in practice of the community pharmacist – emphasizing the expanded role of the pharmacist in patient care and public health issues such as outpatient antibiotic stewardship.     

Examining the association between the “My Pharmacist” model and the service quality of community pharmacies

BackgroundIn Japan, patients can freely choose medical facilities. Many visit different medical facilities for different diseases, and for convenience, often utilize the pharmacies neighboring these facilities. Accordingly, a “My Pharmacy” model was recommended, in which patients select a single pharmacy using their own judgement to receive proper medication services. A “My Pharmacist” model, in which the pharmacist is constantly involved in the treatment of a patient, was also proposed. However, patients’ evaluations of pharmacist/pharmacy services under these models have not been investigated.ObjectiveTo examine how a patient's constant involvement with the same pharmacist and pharmacy is associated with their evaluation of the quality of pharmacy services.MethodsA cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted among patients who used pharmacies periodically. Patients evaluated the pharmacist/pharmacy services and were classified into 4 groups (“My Pharmacy/My Pharmacist,” “My Pharmacy/Multiple Pharmacists,” “Multiple Pharmacies/My Pharmacist,” and “Multiple Pharmacies/Multiple Pharmacists”) according to the form of their usage of pharmacies and pharmacists. An intergroup comparison was then performed and correlations within each group analyzed.ResultsData from 3,492 individuals using 147 pharmacies were analyzed. “My Pharmacy” users had significantly higher scores than did “Multiple Pharmacies” users on patient experience of proper medication services (e.g., identifying duplicate medication) (p < 0.001). “My Pharmacy/My Pharmacist” users scored higher than the other three groups on four evaluation factors, including “pharmacy/pharmacist's interpersonal services” (“sharing and utilizing patient information,” “enhanced health support function,” and “consideration towards patients”), “patient satisfaction with the pharmacy,” “placing more emphasis on quality of interaction with pharmacist than on waiting time,” and “attitude when visiting healthcare facilities” (all p < 0.001).ConclusionThe findings indicate that highly tailored, in-person services provided by “My Pharmacists” are associated with not only with the degree of patients’ overall satisfaction, but also their evaluation of “the quality of pharmacist services.”     

Assessing the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for professional services to community pharmacy: A systematic review

BackgroundDespite the growth of research in how professional services are implemented in the community pharmacy setting, there is limited evidence for which implementation strategy is more effective.ObjectiveThe aim of this review was to assess the evidence for the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for pharmacist delivered professional services in the community pharmacy.MethodsStudies comparing implementation strategies published in the last 13 years in English were extracted via four databases, combining the topics of ‘pharmacy’, ‘pharmacy services’ and ‘implementation’. Experimental studies with quantitative evaluation of two or more implementation strategies were included. Selected studies were screened through three internationally recognised tools, two focusing on implementation: quality of evidence (Cochrane Qualitative & Implementation Methods Group), reporting standards (Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies - StaRI), and one assessing the risk of bias (The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions).ResultsSix studies were identified, assessing the implementation of services improving use of medicines (n = 2), primary care and public health services (n = 3), and one study evaluating the implementation of services in both categories. Some form of staff training was demonstrated to be more effective (n = 4). The risk of bias ranged from moderate to critical. With respect to reporting on StaRI tool items, the mention of these was, in the majority, indirect. Items such as harms and published protocols and economic evaluation were not reported in any of the studies included in the final review, highlighting opportunities for improvement.ConclusionsTraining may be superior for implementation of professional services to community pharmacies, although this finding is limited by a moderate to critical risk of bias. A recommendation to researchers is for the greater use of comparative implementation study designs that reflect recognised reporting, quality and validity tools.RegistrationNone.     

How to enhance public health service utilization in community pharmacy?: General public and health providers' perspectives

BackgroundCommunity pharmacists (PHs) in England are increasingly providing a range of public health services. However, the general public view pharmacists as drug experts and not experts in health, and therefore, services may be underutilized.ObjectivesTo explore experiences and views of 4 groups of participants, the general public, PHs, general practitioners (GPs), and other stakeholders (STs) on pharmacy-based public health services, and identify potential factors affecting service use.MethodsThe study was undertaken in a locality of North West England. Three focus groups were conducted with the general public (n = 16), grouped by socioeconomic status. Fourteen semistructured interviews were undertaken with PHs (n = 9), GPs (n = 2), and STs (n = 3). Discussions/interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically.ResultsAll 4 groups of participants agreed that community pharmacies are a good source of advice on medicines and minor ailments but were less supportive of public health services. Six factors were identified affecting utilization of pharmacy services: community pharmacy environment, pharmacist and support staff, service publicity, general public, GP services, and health care system and policies. Crucial obstacles that could inhibit service utilization are perceptions of both the general public and other health providers toward pharmacists' competencies, privacy and confidentiality in pharmacies, high dispensing workload, and inadequate financial support. Networking between local health professionals could enhance confidence in service delivery, general awareness, and thus utilization.ConclusionsCommunity pharmacy has the potential to deliver public health services, although the impact on public health may be limited. Addressing the factors identified could help to increase utilization and impact of pharmacy public health services.     

Planning for health information exchange: Perspectives of community pharmacists in the Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network of Indiana

BackgroundCommunity pharmacists are one of the most accessible health professionals and provide many different services. However, lack of access to complete patient information is a barrier to making meaningful patient interventions.ObjectivesTo determine (1) current and desired health information access among community pharmacists in the Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network (CPESN) of Indiana and (2) design considerations for a health information exchange tool for use by community pharmacists.MethodsThis voluntary study was conducted over an 8-day survey period in which 40 pharmacies within the CPESN Indiana network were contacted during regular business hours and asked to take part in a 15-minute telephone survey. Questions asked were informed by the following Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research intervention characteristics domain constructs: relative advantage, evidence strength and quality, adaptability, trialability, complexity, costs, and design quality and packaging.ResultsOf the 40 contacted pharmacies, 32 (80%) completed the survey. Most pharmacies reported access to immunization registry data; no other routine access was reported by any pharmacy. In questions assessing the relative advantage of Health Information Exchange (HIE) access compared with their current information access, at least 84.4% said that they agreed or strongly agreed with all statements. When choosing the data element most desirable to have access to via HIE in a community pharmacy, the most frequently selected choices were updated medication orders (n = 18, 56.3%), progress notes (n = 5, 15.6%), and laboratory tests (n = 4, 12.5%). Suggestions to improve ease of implementation included integration within dispensing software and clinical decision-making support features, such as alerts for pertinent lab values.ConclusionIntegrating HIE data into community pharmacies would provide community pharmacists with access to important patient data, and pharmacists believed that this would improve their practice. Future research should explore whether implementation of this type of tool leads to better patient outcomes and improved pharmacist job satisfaction.     

Clinical impact of a community pharmacy-based health and wellness introductory pharmacy practice experience

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical impact of an intensive community pharmacy-based Health and Wellness Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE) completed by second-year (P2) student pharmacists.DesignThe Health and Wellness IPPE was a 1-week rotation developed to provide P2 student pharmacists with opportunities to provide clinical services to patients within the community pharmacy setting. Student pharmacists administered immunizations, performed blood pressure screenings and blood glucose measurements, and provided education to patients under the guidance of licensed pharmacist preceptors.Setting and participantsSecond-year student pharmacists completing a required Health and Wellness IPPE rotation in the community pharmacy setting.Outcomes measuredStudent pharmacist interventions were assessed to determine the course’s clinical impact, and preceptors were surveyed regarding the feasibility of student pharmacists performing clinical services at their training sites.ResultsA total of 147 student pharmacists completed the IPPE at 89 community pharmacy training sites and administered 9392 injections, 90% of which were influenza vaccinations. Student pharmacists performed 3458 patient health assessments, including measuring patients’ blood pressure and blood glucose and reviewing patient education materials. Most preceptors indicated that core activities were feasible during the experience.ConclusionThis study found that implementing a concentrated IPPE focused on immunizations and health screenings allowed student pharmacists to enhance their clinical skills and fulfill a large public health need, improving patient outcomes. Future studies should explore utilizing student pharmacists in community pharmacy settings to expand clinical services offered beyond these 2 services, such as diabetes risk tests, influenza point-of-care testing, and smoking cessation counseling.     

Medication synchronization adoption and pharmacy performance

BackgroundWhile medication synchronization programs are becoming a staple in community pharmacies, a standard process needs to be identified to provide consistent positive outcomes. Many studies demonstrate how medication synchronization affects individual level patients but have not examined how medication synchronization affects the pharmacy's performance. Because community pharmacies are calibrated based on performance to adherence measures for all patients, it is important to understand whether resource-intensive interventions, such as medication synchronization, lead to improved performance.ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to 1) examine pharmacy characteristics associated with medication synchronization adoption and 2) examine whether medication synchronization is associated with pharmacy-level performance on select medication adherence and utilization measures.MethodsThis study used a cross-sectional design. Community pharmacies participating in the North Carolina Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network (NC CPESN?) program were included in this study. Pharmacy performance was measured as summary score of pharmacy's performance on seven risk-adjusted measures which were used to measure pharmacy's performance in the program. Adoption of medication synchronization was measured as a binary variable capturing whether the pharmacy offered med sync at the time the survey was administered.ResultsSurveys were received from 160 out of 268 participating pharmacies (59.7% response rate) with a total of 155 pharmacies being included in the analytic sample. Pharmacies that adopted medication synchronization were more likely to have a clinical pharmacist on staff (c = 5.4, p = 0.019). Holding all else constant, medication synchronization adoption was not significantly associated with total medication adherence performance (p = 0.371).ConclusionMedication synchronization has proven successful in improving individual patient level adherence but may not change a pharmacy's overall performance in adherence for all patients. Further research is needed to examine how effective implementation might contribute to whether a medication synchronization program leads to meaningful gains in adherence for all patients.     

Virtual pharmacist interventions on abuse of over-the-counter medications during COVID-19 versus traditional pharmacist interventions

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the frequency, nature, and clinical significance of pharmacist interventions on over-the-counter (OTC) medicines with abuse potential across community pharmacies with and without virtual care.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, a trained research team observed the dispensary teams of 12 community pharmacies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), 6 of which were operating virtual pharmacy care. A standardized data collection form was used to include information about dispensing of OTC medicines and pharmacist interventions on those with abuse/misuse potential. The clinical significance of the interventions was evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee.ResultsThe frequency of pharmacist interventions on OTC medicines with abuse potential across pharmacies with and without virtual services was 83.2% versus 91.0%, respectively, whereas the frequency of pharmacist interventions on OTC medicines with misuse potential across pharmacies with and without virtual services was 79.8% versus 41.2%, respectively. The proportions of clinically significant interventions across pharmacies with and without virtual services were 19.7% versus 10.5%, respectively. Cough medicines were dispensed significantly more across pharmacies with virtual care than across pharmacies without virtual care (25.6% vs. 9.7%, respectively; P = 0.04). Asking the patient to seek the advice of an addiction specialist (adjusted odds ratio = 4.11; P = 0.001) versus refusing to sell the drug was more likely to be associated with pharmacies with virtual services than with pharmacies operating traditional pharmacy services.ConclusionVirtual pharmaceutical care is a potential approach to reduce the abuse/misuse of OTC medicines but needs some improvements regarding detection of these cases. The UAE is the first country in the region to implement and regulate virtual pharmacy practice.     

Intervention research to enhance community pharmacists' cognitive services: A systematic review

BackgroundPositive impact of community pharmacists' cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS) is well documented. However, community pharmacists have been slow to expand CPS roles. This systematic review explores how community pharmacy intervention research can help inform efforts to expand cognitive pharmaceutical service delivery.ObjectivesTo: 1) identify community pharmacy CPS intervention studies that report data on pharmacist behaviors, either as a final study outcome itself or as a fidelity measure in patient outcome studies, and 2) describe the state of this research to help frame future research agendas.MethodsEmpirical articles examining improvement or expansion of community pharmacist cognitive services published through December 2010 were searched using various search engines, bibliography searches and authors' libraries. Studies were included if they: 1) reported findings on pharmacist behaviors during cognitive service delivery, 2) employed a minimum of pre-post design or two study arms for pharmacists/pharmacies, and 3) were in community-based pharmacies.ResultsA total of 50 studies evaluated impact of community pharmacy based CPS delivery; however, only 21 included a pharmacist behavior outcome measure as a final outcome or as a fidelity measure. The majority (14 out of 21) of studies used a randomized controlled trial design. Nearly half (10 of 21) addressed asthma or tobacco cessation. Limited details were provided about interventions to prepare pharmacists for CPS delivery. The most frequent measures of pharmacist behavior were patient surveys and observation of pharmacists' behavior by secret shoppers; electronic data sets were rarely used.ConclusionsThere is a need for well-designed intervention research that evaluates how interventions impact on pharmacist cognitive service behavior. Positive findings from this review reinforce that planned interventions have the potential to improve and expand pharmacist cognitive service delivery; however, more detail is needed in study publications for this potential to be fully realized.     

The I-Tribe Community Pharmacy Practice Model: Professional pharmacy unshackled

ObjectiveTo describe a mechanism by which pharmacists could create a disruptive innovation to provide professional primary care services via a Web-based delivery model.SummarySeveral obstacles have prevented pharmacists from using available technology to develop business models that capitalize on their clinical skills in primary care. Community practice has experienced multiple sustaining innovations that have improved dispensing productivity but have not stimulated sufficient demand for pharmacy services to disrupt the marketplace and provide new opportunities for pharmacists. Pharmacists are in a unique position to bridge the gap between demand for basic primary medical care and access to a competent medical professional. Building on the historic strengths of community pharmacy practice, modern pharmacists could provide a disruptive innovation in the marketplace for primary care by taking advantage of new technology and implementing the I-Tribe Community Pharmacy Practice Model (I-Tribe). This model would directly connect pharmacists to patients through an interactive, secure Web presence that would liberate the relationship from geographic restrictions.ConclusionThe I-Tribe is a disruptive innovation that could become the foundation for a vibrant market in pharmacist professional service offerings. The I-Tribe model could benefit society by expanding access to primary medical care while simultaneously providing a new source of revenue for community practice pharmacists. Entrepreneurial innovation through I-Tribe pharmacy would free pharmacists to become the care providers envisioned by the profession's thought leaders.     

Assessing health literacy practices in a community pharmacy environment: Experiences using the AHRQ Pharmacy Health Literacy Assessment Tool

BackgroundThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) developed the tool, “Is Our Pharmacy Meeting Patients' Needs? Pharmacy Health Literacy Assessment Tool” to evaluate health literacy preparedness of pharmacy environments from patient, staff, and environmental perspectives. The tool was designed at a clinic-based, outpatient pharmacy of a large, urban, public hospital. Despite the ready availability of this tool and the encouragement of AHRQ to adapt it to other environments, there is no published literature on the dissemination and translation of this tool in the community pharmacy environment.ObjectivesThe five objectives of this study were to: (1) pilot the AHRQ tool “Is Our Pharmacy Meeting Patients' Needs? Pharmacy Health Literacy Assessment Tool” in a community pharmacy environment; (2) evaluate and adapt the tool; (3) describe the use of health literacy practices from patient, staff, and independent auditor perspectives using the revised tool; (4) evaluate the effect of a low-intensity educational health literacy awareness program; and (5) identify opportunities to improve health literacy-sensitive practices in the community pharmacy environment.MethodThe study employed a mixed method, posttest-only control group design using community pharmacies in the Tulsa, OK area. Participants included community pharmacists, staff, patients, and independent auditors. Select pharmacy staff members were invited to receive a health literacy training program delivered by a nationally-recognized health literacy expert to raise awareness of health literacy issues. Approximately eight months after the program, pharmacy staffs were surveyed using a written instrument, patients were interviewed by telephone, and the study investigators performed independent environmental audits in each of the selected pharmacies. Results from auditor evaluations, staff survey responses, and patient interviews were compared for similarities and differences to provide a multidimensional perspective about the use of health literacy-sensitive practices.ResultsAfter piloting and adapting the AHRQ tool for the community pharmacy environment, 60 patients completed telephone interviews, 31 staff members completed surveys, and four independent auditors completed environmental audits in six study pharmacies using the revised data collection instruments. The majority of patients and staff were in agreement that written materials were easy to read. However, the auditors did not report equally high agreement regarding the readability qualities of the written materials. While the majority of staff reported use of literacy-sensitive communication techniques with patients, only a minority of patients reported actual communication with the pharmacist and use of literacy-sensitive communication techniques. At trained pharmacies, a significantly larger proportion of patients reported that the pharmacist spent enough time answering their questions (100% vs. 87%, P = 0.038), but a smaller proportion reported the pharmacists reviewed important information from the written information provided (30% vs. 57%, P = 0.035). A significantly smaller proportion of pharmacy staff also reported using the repeat-back technique at the trained pharmacies (40% vs. 79%, P = 0.035).ConclusionThis project is the first to report piloting, revision, and implementation of the AHRQ Health Literacy Assessment Tool in a community pharmacy practice setting. In addition to adapting data collection instruments and implementation strategies, opportunities that target training to facilitate use of literacy-sensitive practices and active patient engagement with literacy-sensitive communication techniques were identified.