Single-fraction brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer: The UCSF experience

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer, but experience with single-fraction brachytherapy is limited by studies with small sample size. We report a large single-institution experience with single-fraction HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsRetrospective chart review was performed for men treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Competing risk analyses were performed to estimate subdistribution hazard ratio and cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and prostate cancer–specific mortality.ResultsWe identified 124 men with a median followup of 2.2 years (interquartile range 25th to 75th percentile: 1.8–3). Overall, 21.0% of patients (n = 26) were low risk, 44.4% (n = 55) were favorable intermediate risk, and 34.7% (n = 43) were unfavorable intermediate risk. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of BCR was 3.5%: 0% for low risk, 4.0% for favorable intermediate risk patients, and 4.5% for unfavorable intermediate risk patients. In total, 12 BCRs were observed (9.7%) and approximately half occurred after median followup of 2.2 years. Compared with low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk disease, unfavorable intermediate-risk disease was significantly associated with BCR (subdistribution hazard ratio: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.1 to 11.1, p = 0.03). Prostate cancer–specific mortality was 0%. No patient experienced Grade 3 or higher acute or late genitourinary toxicity.ConclusionsSingle-fraction brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer was safe with promising short-term disease control rates, especially for low-risk patients. Longer term followup is needed as we observed an overall BCR rate of 9.7%.     

Treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with Cs-131: Long-term results from a single institution

PURPOSETo evaluate our institutional outcomes utilizing Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy (PB) for the intermediate-risk (IR) group of prostate cancer patients.METHODS AND MATERIALSWe reviewed a prospectively collected database of men treated with Cs-131 PB between 2006 and 2019. Patients with less than 24-months follow-up were excluded. Patients were classified as IR if they had one of the following factors: Gleason Score 7, prostate specific antigen >10 but <20 ng/mL, or T2b-c on clinical exam. We defined unfavorable-IR (UIR) as having either Grade Group 3, >1 IR factors, or ≥50% positive core biopsies. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate actuarial event-time probabilities for biochemical freedom from disease (BFD).RESULTSA total of 335 patients with a median follow-up of 70.1 months (IQR 48.3–106.3 months) were identified. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 7.2% of patients. Favorable-IR (FIR) patients were commonly treated with PB alone (91.8%). FIR patients who underwent PB alone had a 5-year BFD of 98.1%. UIR patients were commonly treated with external beam radiotherapy plus PB (61.2%). These patients had 5-year BFD of 91.1%. The 5-year BFD for UIR patients treated without ADT was 90.9%, whereas it was 95.0% among UIR patients treated with ADT (log-rank p = 0.83).CONCLUSIONSFIR patients have excellent outcomes when treated with PB alone. External beam radiotherapy plus PB is a reasonable treatment approach for UIR patients. Future studies may elucidate which IR patients would benefit from treatment intensification.     

Variations in patterns of concurrent androgen deprivation therapy use based on dose escalation with external beam radiotherapy vs. brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer

PurposeRetrospective data suggest less benefit from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the setting of dose-escalated definitive radiation for prostate cancer, especially when a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy approaches are used. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that patients with prostate cancer with intermediate- or high-risk disease undergoing extreme dose escalation with a brachytherapy boost are less likely to receive ADT.Methods and MaterialsData from the National Cancer Database were extracted for men aged 40–90 years diagnosed with node-negative, non-metastatic prostate cancer from 2004 to 2015. Only patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease who were treated with definitive radiotherapy were included. The association and patterns of care between dose escalated radiotherapy and ADT receipt were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsPatients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were significantly less likely to receive ADT if they underwent dose escalation with a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy (odds ratio 0.67, p < 0.0001). Over time, this decrease in ADT utilization has widened for patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. There was no difference in ADT utilization when comparing patients treated with non–dose-escalated EBRT to those treated with dose-escalated EBRT (without brachytherapy).ConclusionIn this large national database, patients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were significantly less likely to receive guideline-indicated ADT if they underwent extreme dose escalation with combined radiation modalities. As we await prospective data guiding the utility of ADT with dose escalated radiation, these findings suggest potential underutilization of ADT in patients at higher risk of advanced disease.     

Racial differences in the PSA bounce in predicting prostate cancer outcomes after brachytherapy: Evidence from the Department of Veterans Affairs

PurposeAfrican American men have historically had poorer prostate cancer biochemical and survival outcomes than Caucasians. However, emerging data suggest nononcologic factors drive much of this disparity. Prior evidence has suggested an association between a transient prostate specific antigen (PSA) bounce and improved biochemical control. However, racial differences in this relationship have remained relatively unexplored.Methods and MaterialsWe identified 4477 men treated for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from 2000 to 2010 with brachytherapy alone or in combination with external beam radiotherapy without androgen deprivation. Longitudinal PSA data were used to define to biochemical failure and PSA bounce. Cox proportional hazard models were used explore racial differences in the relationship between the PSA bounce and time to biochemical failure.ResultsThirty-one percent of our sample experienced a PSA bounce, with African Americans more likely to experience a bounce (42%) compared with Caucasians (29%); p < 0.001. Despite this, African Americans had a higher likelihood of biochemical failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.4; p = 0.006). However, African American men experiencing a PSA bounce were less likely to experience a biochemical failure (HR = 0.64; p = 0.046), whereas this relationship was not statistically significant for Caucasians (HR = 0.78; p = 0.092). On multivariate analysis, African Americans receiving brachytherapy alone were most sensitive to the protective benefit of the PSA bounce (HR = 0.64).ConclusionsA PSA bounce was associated with improved biochemical control among patients receiving brachytherapy as part of their treatment for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer at the VA. African American men treated with brachytherapy had a particularly pronounced biochemical control benefit of a PSA bounce.     

Assessing the role of external beam radiation therapy in combination with brachytherapy versus brachytherapy alone for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUNDDefinitive treatment options for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (UIR-PCa) include external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± brachytherapy boost ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The role of brachytherapy ± ADT in the absence of EBRT is not well defined. We hypothesized that EBRT+BT±ADT is associated with improved overall survival (OS) relative to BT±ADT for UIR-PCa.METHODS AND MATERIALSMen with UIR-PCa diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Inverse propensity of treatment weighting was used to balance covariables that influenced treatment allocation and outcomes, and propensity-weighted multivariable analysis (MVA) using Cox regression modeling was used to compare OS hazard ratios.RESULTSA total of 11,721 men were stratified into four treatment groups: (1) BT without ADT (n = 4,535), (2) BT+ADT (n = 1,303), (3) EBRT+BT (n = 3,446), or (4) EBRT+BT+ADT (n = 2,437). Relative to patients treated with BT alone, BT+ADT (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.86 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.76–0.99], p = 0.03), EBRT+BT (HR: 0.79 [0.70–0.88], p = 0.00002), and EBRT+BT+ADT (HR: 0.76 [0.67–0.85], p = 0.000003) were associated with improved OS on MVA. Relative to BT alone, EBRT+BT correlated with improved OS on weight-adjusted MVA (HR: 0.82 [0.75–0.89], p = 0.000005). 10-year OS for BT vs. EBRT+BT was 62.4% [60.1–64.7] vs. 69.3% [67.5–71.2], respectively (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSEBRT+BT correlated with improved OS relative to BT alone in men with UIR-PCa, reaffirming current NCCN recommendations recommending EBRT+BT over BT alone. While prior studies reported no benefit to adding EBRT to BT with optimal implant dosimetry, this study suggests men benefit from EBRT in a population of variable implant quality.     

Cesium-131 prostate brachytherapy: A single institutional long-term experience

AimsTo report on the PSA outcomes in men undergoing prostate seed implant (PSI) with Cesium-131 at a single institution.Materials and MethodsAll patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy with Cesium-131 (¹³¹Cs) at our institution and had the potential for at least 24 months of follow up were included in this study. Results are reported for the by NCCN risk group (low, low/high-intermediate, and high), as well as by treatment received (monotherapy, combination external beam radiation + PSI, or trimodal therapy with androgen deprivation). The Phoenix definition (absolute nadir plus 2 ng/mL) was used to define biochemical freedom from disease (BFD).ResultsEight hundred and six men have undergone prostate brachytherapy with Cesium-131 at our institution, and 669 men were included in analysis. Median follow up was 60.0 months (range: 0–144 months). According to NCCN risk categories, 29.9% were low-, 55.6% intermediate-, and 14.5% high-risk. Using the Phoenix criteria, 5/10-year BFD was 97.1/95.3% for patients in the low-risk category, 94.0/90.1% for patients in the intermediate-risk category, and 86.2/56.6% for patients in the high-risk category. PSA ≤0.2 ng/dL at 4 years was predictive of 10 year biochemical control: 96.3% vs 70.4%, p < 0.001.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates that prostate brachytherapy with ¹³¹Cs achieves excellent long-term biochemical control.     

Biochemical outcomes and predictive factors by risk group after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2,316 patients

PurposeTo evaluate the biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) by risk group and treatment modality and the predictive factors of bFFF by risk group in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study (Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 [I-125] Seed Implantation) in Japan during the first 2 years.Methods and MaterialsThe analyses included 2,316 participants in 42 institutions; bFFF was evaluated using the Phoenix definition and calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the factors associated with bFFF.ResultsMedian followup period was 60.0 months. The 5-year bFFF rates in all patients, 1,028 low-risk patients, 1,114 intermediate-risk patients, and 133 high-risk patients were 93.6%, 94.9%, 92.7%, and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year bFFF rates in the PI group and EBRT combination therapy group were 93.7% and 93.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, higher Gleason score (GS), higher percent positive biopsies (%PB), and lower prostate V₁₀₀ (p = 0.0012, 0.0030, 0.0026, and 0.0368) in all patients; younger age, higher pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and lower prostate V₁₀₀ (p = 0.0002, 0.0048, and 0.0012) in low-risk patients; higher GS, higher %PB, and no hormonal treatment (p = 0.0005, 0.0120, and 0.0022) in intermediate-risk patients; and higher GS and higher %PB (p = 0.0329 and 0.0120) in high-risk patients were significantly associated with bFFF.ConclusionsPI with or without EBRT resulted in excellent short-term biochemical outcomes in all risk groups, especially in high-risk patients. Age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and prostate V₁₀₀ in low-risk patients; GS, %PB, and hormonal treatment in intermediate-risk patients; and GS and %PB in high-risk patients were independently affected bFFF.     

After ASCENDE-RT: Biochemical and survival outcomes following combined external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy for high-risk and unfavourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer,a population-based analysis

PURPOSETo evaluate the outcomes of unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients treated with combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB).METHODS AND MATERIALSA population-based cohort of 568 prostate cancer patients treated with combined EBRT and LDR-PB from 2010 to 2016 was analyzed. All patients received EBRT followed by LDR-PB boost. Outcomes were compared with the results for the brachytherapy arm of the ASCENDE-RT trial.RESULTSThe median followup was 4.5 years. Sixty-nine percent (N = 391) had HR disease. Ninety-four percent of the HR and 57% of UIR were treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a median duration of 12 months. The 5-year K-M biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were 84 ± 2%, 90 ± 2%, and 88 ± 2%, similar to 89 ± 5%, 94 ± 4%, and 92 ± 4% for the ASCENDE-RT LDR-PB arm. The likelihood of achieving a PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL at 4 years was 88%, similar to 86% in the ASCENDE-RT LDR-PB arm. Thirty-three men (5.8%) would have been ineligible for ASCENDE-RT due to high-risk features. The 5-year K-M b-PFS, MFS and OS estimates were 86 ± 2%, 92 ± 1% and 89 ± 2% for the ASCENDE-RT eligible versus 56 ± 10% (p < 0.001), 73 ± 8% (p < 0.001), and 77 ± 9% (p = 0.098) for the ineligible patients.CONCLUSIONSIn this population-based cohort, combining LDR-PB with pelvic EBRT (+/- ADT) achieves very favorable b-PFS that compares to the LDR-PB arm of the ASCENDE-RT, supporting the generalizability of those results. Men ineligible for ASCENDE-RT, based on prognostic features, have a much higher risk of biochemical recurrence and metastatic relapse.     

Assessing the impact of brachytherapy boost and androgen deprivation therapy on survival outcomes for patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUNDCurrent recommendations regarding radiotherapy treatment for unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (UIR-PCa) include external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± brachytherapy boost (BT) ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The ideal radiotherapy treatment approach for UIR-PCa has not been well-defined. We hypothesized that EBRT+BT±ADT is associated with improved overall survival (OS) relative to EBRT±ADT in men with UIR-PCa.MATERIALS AND METHODSThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to retrospectively identify 32,246 men diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with UIR-PCa who received EBRT (n = 13,265), EBRT+ADT (n = 13,123), EBRT+BT (n = 3440), or EBRT+BT+ADT (n = 2418). OS was the primary outcome. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for covariable imbalances and weight-adjusted multivariable analysis using Cox regression modeling was used to compare OS hazard ratios.RESULTSMedian follow-up was 60 months (range: 3–168 months). EBRT+ADT correlated with improved OS relative to EBRT alone on multivariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.92, [95% Confidence Interval: 0.87–0.98], p = 0.005). Compared to EBRT+ADT, EBRT+BT (HR: 0.77 [0.69–0.85], p = 3 × 10^?7) and EBRT+BT+ADT (HR: 0.75 [0.67–0.83], p = 6 × 10^?8) were associated with improved OS. Eight-years OS for the EBRT+ADT versus EBRT+BT+ADT was 70% and 78% (p < 0.0001), which is similar to historical clinical trials (ASCENDE-RT 9-year OS: 74% vs. 78%, p = 0.29). Relative to EBRT+BT, EBRT+BT+ADT was not associated with improved OS (HR: 0.99 [0.87–1.11], p = 0.82).CONCLUSIONSIn a large retrospective cohort, the addition of brachytherapy to EBRT correlated with improved survival in men with UIR-PCa. Men receiving EBRT+ADT+BT had improved OS relative to EBRT+ADT. The addition of ADT to EBRT, but not to EBRT+BT, correlated with improved OS.     

Knife or needles? A cohort analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy for men with low- or intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes for men with early stage prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or brachytherapy (BT) at a single tertiary care center.Methods and MaterialsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 371 men with clinical T1a–T2c disease with prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL and Gleason score (GS) 6–7 who were treated with RP (n = 279) or BT (n = 92) at MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2000–2001. Biochemical recurrence–free survival (BRFS) and prostate cancer–specific survival rates were compared by treatment modality.ResultsThe median followup time was 7.2 and 7.6 years for patients treated with RP and BT, respectively. Disease was upgraded from GS 6 to 7 after central review of the biopsy specimen for 36 men treated with RP (12.9%) and 15 men treated with BT (16.3%). After RP, GS was upgraded in 121 men (43.4%) between the centrally reviewed biopsy and the RP specimen. After RP, 5-year BRFS rates were 96.1% and 90.6% for low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.003). After BT, 5-year BRFS rates were 92.5% and 95.8% for low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.017). After RP or BT, 5-year BRFS rates were not significantly different with GS upgraded. Five-year prostate cancer–specific survival rates for patients with upgraded GS were 100% for both RP and BT.ConclusionsExcellent disease control outcomes can be achieved after either RP or BT as monotherapy for men with early stage prostate cancer. Upgrading of GS from 6 to 7, either (3 + 4) or (4 + 3), did not predict for worse outcomes.     

Two-step transurethral surgery of the prostate and permanent implant brachytherapy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer

PurposeProstate brachytherapy is an increasingly used treatment option for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, patients with preexisting lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and PCa, who would otherwise be good brachytherapy candidates, are often contraindicated because of the risk of postoperative urinary morbidity. We report our clinical experience with limited transurethral resection of the prostate (LTURP) and/or transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) months before brachytherapy to treat patients with LUTS and low- to intermediate-risk PCa.Methods and MaterialsOf 258 men undergoing prostate brachytherapy at our institution between 1998 and 2011, 42 were treated with planned LTURP and/or TUIP well before (mean, 5.7 months) seed implantation. Transurethral surgery was considered before brachytherapy for patients who at presentation required α-blocker therapy for LUTS, had an International Prostate Symptom Score greater than 14 off α-blockers, or had an elevated postvoid residual (>100 mL). Patients only proceeded to brachytherapy once LUTS resolved.ResultsAll 42 patients in our series underwent TUIP (25), LTURP (7), or TUIP/LTURP (10) with mean 5.7 months before prostate brachytherapy for low- or intermediate-risk PCa. Mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and postvoid residual significantly improved after transurethral surgery, and improvement persisted at the latest followup. No patient developed retention, urethral necrosis, or urinary incontinence after transurethral surgery or brachytherapy (median followup, 39 months and range, 1–121).ConclusionsPlanned LTURP and/or TUIP more than 4 months before brachytherapy is a safe and effective treatment strategy for men with LUTS and low- to intermediate-risk PCa.     

Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning: The impact on patient-reported health-related quality of life

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy uses volumetric imaging for treatment planning. Our institution transitioned from computed tomography (CT)-based planning to MRI-based planning with the hypothesis that improved visualization could reduce treatment-related toxicity. This study aimed to compare the patient-reported health-related quality of life (hrQOL) and physician-graded toxicity outcomes of CT-based and MRI-based HDR prostate brachytherapy.MethodsFrom 2016 to 2019, 122 patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. Patients underwent CT only or CT and MRI imaging for treatment planning and were grouped per treatment planning imaging modality. Patient-reported hrQOL in the genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual domains was assessed using International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form-26 questionnaires. Baseline characteristics, changes in hrQOL scores, and physician-graded toxicities were compared between groups.ResultsThe median follow-up was 18 months. Patient-reported GU, GI, and sexual scores worsened after treatment but returned toward baseline over time. The CT cohort had a lower baseline mean International Prostate Symptom Score (5.8 vs. 7.8, p = 0.03). The other patient-reported GU and GI scores did not differ between groups. Overall, sexual scores were similar between the CT and MRI cohorts (p = 0.08) but favored the MRI cohort at later follow-up with a smaller decrease in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form-26 sexual score from baseline at 18 months (4.9 vs. 19.8, p = 0.05). Maximum physician-graded GU, GI, and sexual toxicity rates of grade ≥2 were 68%, 3%, and 53%, respectively, with no difference between the cohorts (p = 0.31).ConclusionOur study shows that CT- and MRI-based HDR brachytherapy results in similar rates of GU and GI toxicity. MRI-based planning may result in improved erectile function recovery compared with CT-based planning.     

Manual vs. automated implantation of seeds in prostate brachytherapy: Oncologic results from a single-center study

PurposeThe objective of this study was to study survival and tolerance of prostate cancer patients treated with ¹²⁵I permanent interstitial brachytherapy by automated vs. manual implantation of seeds.Methods and MaterialsBetween 2002 and 2010, 349 selected patients were treated with ¹²⁵I brachytherapy by the same team: from 2002 to April 2005, 65 patients with linked seeds and then 284 patients treated using Nucletron First System automated implantation. We analyzed biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rates and toxicities (univariate and multivariate analyses).ResultsTwo hundred seventy-seven (79.4%) and 69 patients (19.8%) with low- and intermediate-risk disease were treated, respectively (median follow-up: 64 months). The 5-year bRFS rate was 93.1% (95% confidence interval 89.3–95.6) for the entire cohort. The 5-year bRFS rates were 93.4% and 91.7% for patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.42). In univariate and multivariate analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year bRFS rate depending on the implantation technique (93.1% vs. 91.8%, respectively, for automated and linked seeds; p = 0.53). In univariate analysis, only D₉₀ prostate (dose delivered to 90% of the prostate) <140 Gy (p = 0.01), lack of prostate-specific antigen bounce (p = 0.008), and nadir prostate-specific antigen >0.11 (p = 0.01) were predictive factors for bRFS. We observed Grade 3 urethritis in 7 patients (2%), urinary incontinence in 2 patients (0.7%), and Grade 4 proctitis in 2 patients (0.7%).ConclusionsIn this large single-center series, brachytherapy for selected localized prostate cancer achieved excellent rates of biochemical control at 5 years (93.1%) with an acceptable toxicity profile, irrespective of the implantation technique used.     

The use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy in men with low-risk prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy before and after the 1999 American Brachytherapy Society Guideline statement

PurposeIn 1999, the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommended brachy-monotherapy for men with low-risk prostate cancer because of the potential for increased toxicity with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy without the proof of increased efficacy. We investigated the patterns of care in the community in this patient population before and after the reporting of the ABS guideline.Methods and MaterialsThe study cohort consisted of 4943 men (median age, 69.0 years) with low-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without supplemental EBRT from 1991 to 2007 across 21 community radiation oncology centers. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if there was a significant association between the year of brachytherapy, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical tumor (T) category, patient's age, and the use of supplemental EBRT.ResultsSupplemental EBRT was used in 647 men (13%). The EBRT use initially increased until 2001 and then decreased yielding a significant association (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.92; p < 0.001) between the EBRT use and the year of brachytherapy using a quadratic formulation. Specifically, EBRT use peaked at 24.6% in 2001 and subsequently declined to 3.3% by 2007. Men with clinical category T2a as compared with T1c disease (AOR, 1.43; p < 0.001) were more likely to receive combined modality therapy.ConclusionsThe use of supplemental EBRT in men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy has decreased since 2001. This change in practice patterns suggests gradual adoption of the 1999 ABS practice guidelines.     

Detection of failure patterns using advanced imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence following low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)This study describes the pattern of failure in patients with biochemical (BCR) recurrence after low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as a component of definitive treatment for prostate cancer.METHODSPatients with BCR after LDR brachytherapy ± external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were enrolled on prospective IRB approved advanced imaging protocols. Patients underwent 3T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI); a subset underwent prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET/CT. Pathologic confirmation was obtained unless contraindicated.RESULTSBetween January 2011 and April 2021, 51 patients with BCR after brachytherapy (n = 36) or brachytherapy + EBRT (n = 15) underwent mpMRI and were included in this analysis. Of 38 patients with available dosimetry, only two had D90<90%. The prostate and seminal vesicles were a site of failure in 66.7% (n = 34) and 39.2% (n = 20), respectively. PET/CT (n = 32 patients) more often identified lesions pelvic lymph nodes (50%; n = 16) and distant metastases (18.8%; n = 6), than mpMRI. Isolated nodal disease (9.8%; n = 5) and distant metastases (n = 1) without local recurrence were uncommon. Recurrence within the prostate was located in the transition zone in 48.5%, central or midline in 45.5%, and anterior in 36.4% of patients.CONCLUSIONIn this cohort of patients with BCR after LDR brachytherapy ± EBRT, the predominant recurrence pattern was local (prostate ± seminal vesicles) with frequent occurrence in the anterior prostate and transition zone. mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT provided complementary information to localize sites of recurrence, with PSMA PET/CT often confirming mpMRI findings and identifying occult nodal or distant metastases.     

Association of Brachytherapy Boost with Overall Survival for Gleason 9-10 Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Primary versus Secondary Pattern 5

PURPOSEThe addition of a brachytherapy (BT) boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) reduces recurrence risk in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and may reduce PCa-mortality for Gleason grade group 5 (GG5). Whether the extent of pattern five, a risk factor for distant metastases, impacts the benefit of a BT boost is unclear.METHODSMen with localized GG5 PCa treated with (1) EBRT or (2) EBRT+BT between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. EBRT monotherapy group received conventionally fractionated (1.8−2.0 Gy per fraction) ≥74 Gy or moderately hypofractionated (2.5−3.0 Gy per fraction) ≥60 Gy. EBRT + BT group received conventionally fractionated ≥45 Gy or moderately hypofractionated ≥37.5 Gy, and either LDR or HDR BT. All patients received concomitant ADT; none received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or surgery. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards in the overall cohort, followed by subgroups based on primary versus secondary pattern 5. Propensity score- and exact-matching was used to corroborate results.RESULTSA total of 8260 men were eligible: EBRT alone (89%) versus EBRT + BT (11%). 5-year OS for EBRT versus EBRT + BT was 76.3% and 85.0%, respectively (p = 0.002; multivariable adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65−0.98; p = 0.04). These results remained consistent after propensity score and exact matching. The OS advantage of a BT boost was more prominent in men with Gleason 4 + 5 PCa (p = 0.001) and not observed in men with Gleason 5 + 5 or 5 + 4 PCa.CONCLUSIONSExtent of pattern five may be useful in appropriately selecting men for EBRT+BT and should be considered as a pre-randomization stratification variable for future clinical trial design.     

Comparison of AUA and phoenix definitions of biochemical failure following permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSETo compare biochemical recurrence free survival (BCRFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after brachytherapy using the AUA and the Phoenix definitions.METHODS AND MATERIALS2634 men with T1-T4N0M0 prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or external beam radiation therapy. Five, 10, and 15- year BCRFS and CSS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimates with log rank. Multivariate analysis of survival was performed with Cox regression analysis.RESULTSMedian age was 66, follow-up was 8.6 years, and prostate specific antigen was 6.9. Overall, 11.1% (n = 293) of patients experienced Phoenix BCR and 17.48% (n = 457) experienced AUA BCR. The rates of AUA BCR and Phoenix BCR were significantly different at 5 and 10-years but not at 15 years. Patients treated with BED ≤ 200 Gy were more likely to experience AUA BCR (22.5% vs. 12.4%, OR 1.44, p < 0.001) and Phoenix BCR (14.3% and 8.3%, OR 1.37, p < 0.001) than patients treated with a BED > 200 Gy.CONCLUSIONSCompared to the Phoenix definition, the AUA definition of BCR after brachytherapy is associated with significantly worse BCRFS for the first 15 years after treatment. Receiving a BED > 200, which cannot be achieved without the addition of brachytherapy, is associated with better BCRFS and CSS. Our findings reaffirm the importance of dose in the management of prostate cancer     

A comparison of early prostate-specific antigen decline between prostate brachytherapy and different fractionation of external beam radiation—Impact on biochemical failure

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline patterns and PSA nadirs between low-dose-rate seed prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) and different fractionations of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and their predictive importance for biochemical failure (bF).Methods and MaterialsPatients with D'Amico low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent a single-modality treatment without androgen deprivation were included in this study. Three different treatment groups were compared: (1) normofractionation EBRT up to 70.2–79.2 Gy/1.8–2.0 Gy, (2) LDR-PB, and (3) EBRT with hypofractionation 60 Gy/3 Gy daily or 5–7.25 Gy once a week over 9–5 weeks, to a total dose of 45–36.25 Gy, respectively. The log-rank test, Cox regression analysis, and nonparametric tests were used.ResultsWe analyzed 892 patients: the median followup for patients without bF was 84 months (interquartile range 60–102 months), with 12% of patients experiencing bF. The PSA decline within the first 15 months was generally exponential. LDR-PB showed a faster early exponential decline compared with EBRT treatments, but whether decline was fast or slow had no influence on recurrence. The only factors that were positive predictive factors in univariate and multivariate analyses were the time to nadir >48 months (median), PSA nadir <0.5 ng/mL, and <0.2 ng/mL (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsAlthough there are significant differences in early exponential PSA decline between different treatments, only the PSA nadir and longer time to nadir were predictive factors for bF.