The role of seed implantation in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using ERCP

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate the role of iodine-125 seed implantation, guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or percutanous ultrasound, in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma after relief of obstructive jaundice using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods and MaterialsA total of 101 patients with obstructive jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017 in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 50 underwent implantation of iodine-125 seeds under EUS and/or percutaneous ultrasound guidance after receiving a stent via ERCP (treatment group), and 51 received a stent via ERCP without undergoing seed implantation (control group). The clinical data and therapeutic outcomes of these patients were analyzed.ResultsCompared with the control group, the treatment group obtained significant relief of abdominal pain at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month followup (p < 0.05), with a significantly lower visual analog scale pain score (p < 0.05). The treatment group obtained a longer median survival (8.8 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.02), longer median duration of stent patency (10.8 ± 1.4 vs. 6.9 ± 0.8 months, p = 0.02), and prolonged average time to gastric outlet obstruction (6.8 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 months, p = 0.02). Differences between liver function and appetite for the two groups were not significant (p > 0.05 and p = 0.59, respectively).ConclusionsIodine-125 seed implantation after relief of obstructive jaundice via ERCP prolongs survival, biliary stent patency, and time to gastric outlet obstruction and improves patient quality of life by relieving pancreatic pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.     

Malignant obstructive jaundice treated with intraluminal placement of Iodine-125 seed strands and metal stents: An analysis of long-term outcomes and prognostic features

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes, including safety, efficacy, and prognostic features, of intraluminal brachytherapy with Iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strand and stent placement for treatment of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).Methods and MaterialsFrom January 2009 to December 2013, 107 consecutive patients with MOJ were treated with intraluminal placement of ¹²⁵I seed strands and metal stents. A retrospective evaluation of therapeutic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), stent patency rate, complications, and prognostic features, was conducted in 101 patients.Results¹²⁵I seed strands and stents were all successfully implanted. The median followup time was 231 (45–1015) days, and the median OS was 394.0 (95% confidence interval: 319.1–468.9) days. The cumulative OS rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 95%, 77%, 53%, and 20%, respectively. The median stent patency period was 278.0 (95% confidence interval: 164.1–391.9) days, and cumulative patency rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 92%, 69%, 45%, and 13%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that the serum conjugated/total bilirubin ≥88% before procedure (p = 0.032) and whether the patient receiving further treatment (p = 0.041) appear to be the prognostic factors of OS. There is no statistical prognostic factor for stent patency.ConclusionsThe intraluminal placement of ¹²⁵I seed strands and stents appears to be a safe and efficient therapy on MOJ. The patient with serum conjugated/total bilirubin ≥88% before procedure and receiving further treatment seems to live longer.     

A stent with radioactive seed strand insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to assess the relative clinical effectiveness of stent insertion with or without radioactive seed strand (RSS) insertion in patients suffering from malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).Methods and MaterialsRelevant articles published as of November 2020 in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were identified and analyzed. Primary study endpoints for this meta-analysis were stent dysfunction, stent patency, and overall survival (OS), whereas secondary endpoints were rates of clinical success and complications. RevMan v5.3 was used to perform all meta-analyses.ResultsIn total, there were nine studies incorporating 643 patients (280 and 363 who underwent stent insertion with and without RSS, respectively). No differences were observed between these groups with respect to pooled rates of clinical success (p = 0.25), stent dysfunction (p = 0.47), cholangitis (p = 0.97), cholecystitis (p = 0.95), or pancreatitis (p = 0.66). However, stent patency duration (p < 0.00001) and patients’ OS (p < 0.00001) were significantly increased in patients in the stent + RSS group. No heterogeneity was detected for any of these endpoints, nor did funnel plots yield any publication bias. A subgroup analysis of patients with hilar MBO similarly exhibited stent + RSS insertion to be associated with longer stent patency and OS as compared with stent insertion alone.ConclusionsThese findings showed that relative to stent insertion, stent + RSS insertion is associated with longer OS and stent patency in patients with inoperable MBO.     

125I seed implantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeAdvanced hepatocellular carcinoma often combined with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as an effective treatment. Recent studies showed that TACE plus iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed for hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT can improve the remission rate. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of ¹²⁵I seed implantation in patients with PVTT.Methods and MaterialsThe Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and OVID databases were systematically searched from the earliest to October 2018. The references included in the literature were searched. The primary endpoints were remission rate and overall survival, and the secondary endpoints were portal venous pressure and adverse event. The odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were combined using either fixed or random effects model. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsEight studies were included with 1098 patients, 591 patients received ¹²⁵I seed implantation, and 507 in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that ¹²⁵I seed implantation improved the remission rate in patients with PVTT (OR = 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.68–2.99, p = 0.000) and survival rate (HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14–0.40, p = 0.000); it also reduced patient's mortality risk (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.37–0.54, p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis suggested that the death risk of patients who responded to ¹²⁵I seed implantation declined 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.34–0.55, p = 0.000). ¹²⁵I seed implantation is more effective against PVTT delivered at a dose higher than 110 Gy. There was no difference in the occurrence adverse event between the two groups (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.92–1.25, p = 0.262).ConclusionTACE plus ¹²⁵I seed implantation is more effective in treating PVTT. The use of ¹²⁵I seeds dose >110 Gy will show better results.     

No Advantage of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene and Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene–Covered Stents over Uncovered Nitinol Stents for Percutaneous Palliation of Malignant Infrahilar Biliary Obstruction: Results of a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

PurposeTo prove that covered stents are more efficacious than uncovered stents regarding patency, safety, enabling of chemotherapy, and survival in percutaneous palliation of malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction.Materials and MethodsAfter failed endoscopic treatment, 154 patients with obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable infrahilar malignancy were randomly allocated to receive an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and fluorinated ethylene propylene–covered or an uncovered nitinol stent. Occlusion rate, patency, and survival were assessed. Safety and clinical success in terms of chemotherapy were compared.ResultsThree patients were excluded post hoc. Fifteen patients died within 7 d and were excluded from patency analysis. Occlusion rates were 32% (21 of 66) for covered and 29% (20 of 70) for uncovered stents (P = .7). Estimated median patency durations were 308 d (95% confidence interval [CI], 178–438 d) for covered and 442 d (95% CI, 172–712 d) for uncovered stents (P = .1). Serious adverse events (P = 1.0) and 30-day mortality (P = .5) were equivalent between groups. At hospital discharge, median bilirubin reduction of 8 mg/dL was found in both groups (P < .001). In the covered stent group, 35 patients (48%) received palliative chemotherapy, vs 29 (37%) in the uncovered stent group (P = .2). Estimated median survival times were 96 days (95% CI, 68–124 d) with covered stents and 75 days (95% CI, 42–108 d) with uncovered stents (P = .6).ConclusionsIn malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction not amenable to endoscopy, no improvement in patency or survival with percutaneously placed covered stents could be confirmed. Covered and uncovered stent types exhibit similar safety profiles and clinical success rates.     

Effectiveness of percutaneous metal stent placement in cholangiocarcinoma patients with midterm follow-up: Single center experience

Purpose

Patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma present with high rate of local complications. The primary aim of this study is to report clinical course of advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients those who were presented with biliary obstruction and treated with percutaneous biliary stenting.

Material and methods

Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma followed by our center for a period of 4 years were analyzed. For statistical analysis demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, primary biliary drainage method, metal stent occlusion rate, time to stent occlusion, and overall survival rates were recorded.

Results

A total of 34 eligible patients were analyzed. 27 patients had metal stent placement. These 27 patients formed the basis of this study. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.0 months. After metal stent deployment bilurubin levels were normalized within a mean of 10 days. During the follow-up period, 13 patients were experienced metal stent occlusion. Median TtSO was 10 weeks. Cytotoxic chemotherapy was administered to 14 (52%) patients. Patients without stent dysfunction had significantly higher rate of chemotherapy exposure rate (p = 0.021). Statistical analysis, however, failed to exhibit significant effect of stent dysfunction on OS.

Conclusion

In advanced cholangiocarcinoma, relief of bile duct obstruction is an important part of the initial patient management. This study therefore described the clinical value of percutaneous metal stent in cholangiocarcinoma patients and raises the question about patency of metal stent in cholangiocarcinoma whether we can expect success similar to the success achieved in pancreas carcinoma.     

Treatment of malignant inferior vena cava obstruction with Gianturco-Rosch-Z stents: a single center 13-year experience

Rationale and objectivesMalignant obstruction of the IVC can cause severe morbidity and impairment of quality of life in end-stage oncology patients. However, medical literature regarding minimally-invasive palliation using large diameter percutaneous stents, particularly the Gianturco-Rosch-Z (GRZ) stent is limited.Materials & methodsA retrospective review from January 2004 to February 2017, revealed 17 subjects with malignant obstruction of the IVC who were treated with a total of 34 GRZ stents. Pre- and post-stent pressure gradients were measured in 10. Available data regarding clinical presentation and follow-up were recorded.ResultsTechnical success for stent deployment was 100%. A median of 2 stents (range 1 to 5) were deployed per patient, with median stent diameter 20 mm (range 15 to 30 mm). The median pre-treatment pressure gradient of 17.5 mmHg (range 9–31 mmHg) decreased to a median of 4.5 mmHg (range 0–21 mmHg, p < .0004) after stent placement. One subject developed recurrent stent occlusion due to disease progression requiring additional intervention, for a primary patency rate of 94%. Lower extremity edema improved or resolved in 58% of those for whom follow-up data was recorded. Median survival after treatment was only 28 days (range 5 to 607 days). There were no procedural complications.ConclusionEndovascular treatment of malignant IVC obstruction can be safely performed with GRZ stents. Although overall survival is poor, this technique can effectively palliate lower extremity edema symptoms.     

Comparative Study of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stent Placement with or without Iodine-125 Seeds for Treating Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of biliary stent placement with iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seeds in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

Managing occluded stents in biliary obstruction using radiofrequency ablation combined with 125I-strand brachytherapy

PURPOSEWe aimed to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) combined with iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strand brachytherapy (¹²⁵I-BT) for treatment of occluded biliary stents.METHODSFrom November 2015 to September 2017, 13 consecutive patients with occluded biliary metal stents, implanted for malignant obstruction, underwent PRFA combined with ¹²⁵I-BT to reopen the bile duct. Data included clinical and technical success, stent patency, complications, and overall survival.RESULTSThe clinical and technical success rates were both 100%. One month after treatment, the total serum bilirubin level had decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Early complications of cholangitis or hemobilia were experienced by one patient each. Three patients (23.1%) had late complications, including two cases of cholangitis and one case of cholecystitis. During the mean follow-up of 233±82.9 days (range, 88–365 days), the stent patency time was 239±26.5 days (95% CI, 187–291 days), and the 6-month stent patency rate was 68.4%. Five patents died; the mean survival time was 298±30.1 days (95% CI, 239–358 days). The 6-month survival rate was 83%.CONCLUSIONPRFA therapy combined with ¹²⁵I-BT is feasible and safe for patients with occluded metal stents placed for malignant biliary obstruction. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trails are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this new approach.

Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is an effective treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (1). However, stent restenosis occurs within 6 months in over 50% of patients, due to tumor ingrowth, overgrowth, epithelial hyperplasia, and biliary sludge formation (2, 3). There are no clear recommendations regarding how to re-open SEMS occlusions. Recently, some studies reported the safety and efficacy of a Habib EndoHPB percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) catheter for re-opening occluded SEMSs, with a median stent patency time of 102–234 days (4–9).We previously showed that intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) with low dose rate (LDR) iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed strands is effective for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction, prolonging stent patency (10, 11). To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports regarding the use of PRFA and ILBT synchronously to re-open SEMS occlusions. This study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of PRFA combined with ¹²⁵I seed strand brachytherapy (¹²⁵I-BT) for the treatment of malignant biliary occlusion after stenting.     

A novel combination of percutaneous stenting with iodine-125 seed implantation and chemotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer with obstructive jaundice

PurposeInsertion of radioactive strips through the biliary stent has been reported to offer longer survival and patency than an uncovered conventional self-expanding metal stent in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of intraluminal brachytherapy combined with ¹²⁵I seed implantation and transarterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer with obstructive jaundice.MethodFrom October 2012 to January 2018, 21 consecutive patients diagnosed with biliary obstruction caused by locally advanced, nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer with cytologically or histologically confirmed by biopsy were enrolled and receive treatment with intraluminal brachytherapy using ¹²⁵I seed strand and CT-guided percutaneous radioactive seed implantation therapy. The procedure-related and radiation complications were assessed. The outcomes were measured in terms of stent patency, patient survival, complications related to the procedure.ResultOne of the 22 patients (4.5%, 1/22) with pancreatic head cancer failed to perform the above procedure because the guidewire was unable to pass through the obstruction segment. The remaining 21 patients (95.5%, 21/22) with pancreatic head cancer with obstructive jaundice were successfully placed with biliary stents and radioactive strips through drainage tubes. The median number of ¹²⁵I seeds loaded was 15, ranging from 12 to 17. After the chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin, no adverse reaction of Grade Ⅲ ～ Ⅳ occurred in all cases. Median stent patency was 12.50 months (95% CI: 10.26, 14.74). By May 2019, all 21 patients had died, with overall survival of 5.2–23.3 months, with a median survival of 13.20 months (95% CI: 10.96, 15.44).ConclusionPercutaneous ¹²⁵I seed implantation combined with insertion of radioactive strips through the biliary stent has the characteristics of less trauma, fewer complications, simple operation, and so on. These procedures bring remission of obstructive jaundice combined with the increased survival for the treatment of obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable pancreatic head cancer if follow-up chemotherapy is carried out. The long-term efficacy of this treatment combination needs to be confirmed by further multicenter, large sample size prospective randomized controlled studies.     

Endovascular Revascularization as Primary Treatment for Acute Embolic Mesenteric Ischemia: Stent Thrombectomy plus Aspiration versus Aspiration Alone

PurposeTo investigate the outcomes of stent thrombectomy combined with aspiration versus aspiration alone in acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).Materials and MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Between May 1, 2012, and January 1, 2021, 41 patients (mean age, 73.8 years ± 7.9) with AMI who underwent stent thrombectomy plus aspiration (Group 1, n = 14) or aspiration alone (Group 2, n = 27) were included. The treatment regimens and clinical and follow-up outcomes of the patients were reviewed and analyzed. Group differences were compared using a χ² test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or Mann-Whitney U test. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier curve.ResultsThe overall clinical success rate was 78.0% (32/41), and no significant differences were found between Group 1 and Group 2 (78.6% vs 77.8%, P = 1.00). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 was associated with a higher complete clearance rate (44.4% vs 78.6%, P = .04), less adjunctive local thrombolysis (48.1% vs 14.3%, P = .03), and a shorter length of hospital stay (10.7 days ± 9.0 vs 5.7 days ± 4.7, P = .03). The estimated survival rates at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 73.2%, 72.5%, 71.4%, 65.3%, and 59.8%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the survival rate between the groups (log-rank test, P = .96). The recurrence rates for Group 1 and Group 2 were 8.3% (1/12) and 4.0% (1/25), respectively.ConclusionsCompared with aspiration alone, aspiration combined with stent thrombectomy showed a higher complete clearance rate, reduced adjunctive thrombolysis, and a shorter length of hospital stay.     

Safety and Efficacy of Computed Tomography–Guided Iodine-125 Brachytherapy as a Salvage Treatment for Locoregional Lymph Node Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer

PurposeTo investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)–guided iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy as a salvage treatment for esophageal cancer with locoregional lymph node recurrence (LNR).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer who developed locoregional LNR after initial curative resection followed by CT-guided ¹²⁵I brachytherapy as a salvage treatment (January 2014 to January 2020). Local tumor progression–free survival (LTPFS) was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, v1.1. Clinical response was evaluated with the Numerical Rating Scale pain score, and adverse events were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). A layered Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent factors affecting LTPFS.ResultsA total of 52 patients (mean age, 60 years) were included in this study. The median follow-up was 9.3 months (range, 4.3–12 months). The median LTPFS was 7.0 months (interquartile range, 5.0–9.5 months). The local control rates were 100%, 94.2%, 59.6%, and 13.4% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The overall survival rates were 100%, 100%, 82.6%, and 36.5% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The number of locoregional LNRs (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.11–5.10]; P = .026), clinical stage at diagnosis (HR, 8.12 [95% CI, 3.19–20.66]; P < .001), and pathologic stage (HR, 5.74 [95% CI, 2.14–15.39]; P = .001) were independent factors for LTPFS. The rate of pain relief was 96.4% (27 of 28). Treatment-related death was not observed.ConclusionsCT-guided ¹²⁵I radioactive seed implantation resulted in pain relief and short to midterm local control.     

Prognostic implications of visceral obesity on gastric adenocarcinoma: does it really matter?

PurposeTo evaluate the association of visceral adiposity measured on computed tomography (CT) in preoperative period with lymph node (LN) metastasis and overall survival in gastric adenocarcinoma patients.MethodsPreoperative CT scans of 246 gastric adenocarcinoma patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were evaluated. Visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and Total fat area (TFA), VFA/TFA ratio were quantified by CT. VFA/TFA > 29% was defined as visceral obesity. The differentiation, t-stage, n-stage and the number of harvested-metastatic LNs were noted. The maximum thickness of tumor and localization were recorded from CT. Chi-square, Student's t-test, multiple Cox regression, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and Kaplan-Meier algorithm were performed.ResultsThe overall survival (OS) rates and N-stage were not different significantly between viscerally obese and non-obese group (p = 0.994, p = 0.325). The number of metastatic LNs were weakly inversely correlated with VFA (r = −0.144, p = 0.024). Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between visceral obesity and OS or LN metastasis (p = 0.377, p = 0.736). In multivariate analyses, OS was significantly associated with poorly differentiation (HR = 1.72, 95% CI =1.04–2.84, p = 0.035), higher pathologic T and N stage (T4 vs T1 + T2 HR = 2.67, 95% CI =1.18–6.04, p = 0.019; T3 vs T1 + T2 HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 0.90–4.33, p = 0.089; N3b vs N0 HR = 2.97, 95% CI1.45–6.0, p = 0.003; N3 (3a+ 3b) vs N0 HR = 2.24 95% CI =1.15–4.36, p = 0.018).ConclusionVisceral obesity may not be a prognostic factor in resectable gastric adenocarcinoma patients.     

Impact of marital status on receipt of brachytherapy and survival outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer

PurposeMarriage has been associated with enhanced survival among cancer patients, but conflicting correlations have been suggested in cervical cancer. We assessed the impact of marital status on receipt of brachytherapy and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.Methods and MaterialsThree thousand, eight hundred and twelve patients with Stage IB2–IVA cervical cancer diagnosed from 2006 to 2015 treated with external beam radiotherapy were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Chi-square tests were used to compare patient characteristics by marital status and boost type. The association of marital status with brachytherapy (BT) receipt was assessed using multiple logistic regression. Fine and Gray competing risks and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate cervical cancer–specific survival (CCSS) and overall survival (OS), respectively.ResultsMost women were unmarried (58.8%). Half (50.4%) received BT, while 33.1% received no boost; most (86.3%) received chemotherapy. Unmarried women had similar odds of receiving BT as married women (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.90-1.28, p = 0.4370) but were less likely to receive chemotherapy (84.3% vs. 89.1%, p < 0.0001). Singlehood was significantly associated with worse CCSS (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.42, p < 0.0174) and OS (hazard ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.36, p < 0.0153). Not receiving a radiation boost was also significantly associated with worse CCSS (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.43, p = 0.0317) and OS (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.40, p = 0.0100).ConclusionsThere were no differences in BT receipt in married vs. unmarried patients. However, unmarried patients had worse CCSS and OS and were less likely to receive chemotherapy. Interventions targeting social factors are needed to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.     

Percutaneous Gastrostomy Compared with Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer with Dysphagia

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of self-expandable metal stent placement and percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) and dysphagia.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective observational study consisted of 113 patients with EC and dysphagia who underwent either stent placement (n = 47) or PG (n = 66) at a single center between June 2014 and June 2018.ResultsThere were 63 men and 50 women, with a mean age of 76.5 years (standard deviation 4.9 years). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics, except that the PG group had a higher percentage of patients with cervical EC (22.7% vs 2.1%, P < .001). The PG group had better maintenance of nutritional status in terms of reduction in serum albumin level (P = .039) and weight loss (P = .041). Compared with the stent group, the PG group demonstrated a lower incidence of local severe pain (0% vs 21.3%, P < .001) and lower incidence of dislodgment of device (1.5% vs 19.1%, P = .002). The PG group demonstrated longer overall survival compared with the stent group for Stages II and III (201 vs 185 days, P = .034) and Stage IV (122 vs 86 days, P = .001).ConclusionsCompared with stent insertion, PG is associated with better maintenance of nutritional status, fewer complications, and better survival. Thus, PG may be the preferred choice for treating malnutrition in patients with EC and dysphagia.     

I-125 or Pd-103 for brachytherapy boost in men with high-risk prostate cancer: A comparison of survival and morbidity outcomes

PurposeBrachytherapy boost improves biochemical recurrence rates in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). Few data are available on whether one isotope is superior to another. We compared the oncologic and morbidity outcomes of I-125 and Pd-103 in men with HRPC receiving brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsOf 797 patients with HRPC, 190 (23.8%) received I-125 or 607 received Pd-103 with a median of 45 Gy of external beam irradiation. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from metastases (FFMs), cause-specific survival (CSS), and morbidity were compared for the two isotopes by the ANOVA and the χ² test with survival determined by the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression.ResultsMen treated with I-125 had a higher stage (p < 0.001), biological equivalent dose (BED) (p < 0.001), and longer hormone therapy (neoadjuvant hormone therapy, p < 0.001), where men treated with Pd-103 had a higher Gleason score (GS, p < 0.001) and longer followup (median 8.3 vs. 5.3 years, p < 0.001). Ten-year FFBF, FFM, and CSS for I-125 vs. Pd-103 were 77.5 vs. 80.2% (p = 0.897), 94.7 vs. 91.9% (p = 0.017), and 95.4 vs. 91.8% (p = 0.346), respectively. Men with T3 had superior CSS (94.1 vs. 79.5%, p = 0.001) with I-125. Significant covariates by Cox regression for FFBF were prostate specific antigen (PSA), the GS, and the BED (p < 0.001), for FFM PSA (p < 0.001) and GS (p = 0.029), and for CSS PSA, the GS (p < 0.001) and the BED (p = 0.022). Prostate cancer mortality was 7/62 (15.6%) for BED ≤ 150 Gy, 18/229 (7.9%) for BED >150–200 Gy, and 20/470 (5.9%) for BED >200 Gy (p = 0.029). Long-term morbidity was not different for the two isotopes.ConclusionsBrachytherapy boost with I-125 and Pd-103 appears equally effective yielding 10-year CSS of over 90%. I-125 may have an advantage in T3 disease. Higher doses yield the most favorable survival.     

Surgery combined with iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of parotid adenoid cystic carcinoma: A single-institution experience

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the combination of surgery plus postoperative iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the parotid.Methods and MaterialsThis study included a retrospective analysis of the data of patients who underwent postoperative iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for histology-confirmed ACC of the parotid between January 2002 and November 2018 in Peking University Hospital of Stomatology. Acute and long-term radiation-related toxicities were assessed by the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the factors affecting overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS).ResultsA total of 86 patients (53 women; median age 50 years, SD = 13.1) were included. Median followup was for 45.5 months. About half the patients (44/86, 51.3%) had clinical stage IV disease. Local recurrence occurred in 11 of 86 (12.8%) patients. No patient had nodal metastases in the followup period. The five- and 10-year DFS rates were 74.8% and 66.6%, respectively. The mean DMFS was 60.6 months. On multivariate analysis, preoperative facial palsy, type of surgery, perineural spread (PNS), and distant metastases were independent prognostic factors for DFS; preoperative facial palsy, nodal metastases, and PNS were independent prognostic factors for overall survival; and preoperative facial palsy, type of surgery, PNS, and pathological type were independent prognostic factor for DMFS.ConclusionsThe combination of surgery and iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy appears to be an effective and safe treatment for primary ACC of the parotid.     

Impact of radiotherapy modalities on outcomes in the adjuvant management of uterine carcinosarcoma: A National Cancer Database analysis

PurposeIn the postoperative management of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), the roles of individual radiotherapy (RT) modalities, chiefly external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT), remain undefined. We analyzed the survival impact of EBRT and BT using the National Cancer Database.Methods and materialsWe abstracted women diagnosed with UCS from 2004 to 2012 who received hysterectomy and had complete RT information. Cox multivariate analysis and propensity-score matched analyses were used to compare survival among radiotherapeutic approaches.ResultsWe identified 1229 women receiving no radiotherapy, 472 receiving EBRT alone, 331 receiving BT alone, and 271 receiving EBRT+BT. On multivariate analysis of the entire analytic cohort, survival was significantly improved among patients receiving EBRT+BT combination (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58–0.89, p < 0.01), but not among those receiving EBRT alone (HR 0.93, 95% CI = 0.79–1.10, p = 0.41) or BT alone (HR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.68–1.03, p = 0.09). These results were confirmed on propensity-score matches for EBRT vs. no RT (HR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.73–1.07, p = 0.34), BT vs. no RT (HR 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63–1.03, p = 0.09), and EBRT+BT vs. no RT (HR 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.96, p = 0.02).ConclusionsEBRT+BT combination is associated with an overall survival advantage in UCS and warrants consideration in the adjuvant management of this disease.     

Use of ring-enhancement and focal necrosis to differentiate pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on CT and MRI

PurposeTo assess the ability of the ring-enhancing sign and focal necrosis to diagnose adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC), a variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), on MRI and CT.MethodsThe following features of ASqC and conventional PDAC were evaluated on CT and MRI: tumor size, location, margins, borders (non-exophytic, exophytic), and T1 signal intensity. Two readers, blinded to histopathology results, rated their confidence in detecting ring-enhancement and focal necrosis (FN) on a 5-point Likert scale on both MRI and CT. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa (k).ResultsA total of 24 patients were included: eight patients with treatment naïve and histologically proven ASqC (six women, mean age: 63, range: 40–75) and 16 patients with PDAC (eight women, mean age: 67, range: 47–83). Statistically significant differences between ASqC and PDAC were seen in tumor size, location, presence of FN, and ring enhancement (p = 0.01–0.037). The readers were more confident in depicting the key differentiating feature ring-enhancement in ASqC on MRI compared to CT (confidence 1.71 ± 0.49 vs. 0.88 ± 0.35, p = 0.017) with moderate inter-reader agreement (k = 0.46 and 0.5, respectively). FN showed substantial inter-reader agreement on MR and moderate agreement on CT (k = 0.67 and 0.5, respectively).ConclusionsCompared to CT, MRI depicts ring-enhancement in ASqC with greater reader confidence and FN in ASqC with higher inter-reader agreement. The concurrent presence of these two imaging features should raise high suspicion for ASqC.     

Management of acute malignant colorectal obstruction with a novel self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of a newly designed self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) in the treatment of patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction.

Methods

Between April 2001 and October 2007, 52 patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction were treated with a new designed SEMS as an investigational bridge to surgery. Patients were prospectively followed and relevant data collection was collected, including details regarding technique, clinical symptoms, complications, need for elective surgery, and overall survival.

Results

Stent placement was technically successful in all but two patients (due to complete obstruction) with no procedure-related complications. Complications included stent migration (n = 4), anal pain (n = 2) and stool impaction (n = 1). Clinical success was achieved in 49 (98%) of 50 patients with resolution of bowel obstruction within 2 days of stent placement. In one patient with stool impaction 2 days after stent placement, endoscopic disimpaction was successfully performed. An elective one-stage surgical procedure was performed in all 50 patients who successfully received a SEMS as a bridge to surgery within a mean of 8 ± 2 days (range: 4-11 days) after stent placement. Mean follow-up time was 36 ± 12 months (range 3-70 months), and all patients remained alive at the time of this report.

Conclusion

The newly designed SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery was a safe and effective intervention for colonic decompression in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction and allowed a high proportion of patients to be successfully proceeded to elective surgery.