Exceptional Responders Inspire Change: Lessons for Drug Development From the Bedside to the Bench and Back

Targeted therapies have changed the landscape of cancer treatment, although they fail too many patients with advanced cancer. Still, insight gained from an exceptional responder has the power to identify new biomarkers of sensitivity that can unlock subsets of patients across anatomic disease sites who may also derive benefit and facilitate development of novel therapeutic strategies that may overcome resistance. The use of large-scale genomic profiling is a promising first step.     

Lessons from the anemia of prematurity

In our view, three main lessons stem from consideration of the refractory early anemia of prematurity (REAP). These are: (1) Hemoglobin concentration is not enough to describe the anemia. (2) The REAP may be clinically very severe but is often easily missed. It interacts with and worsens other causes of anemia in preterm infants, such as blood losses. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, but it is generally interrelated with short gestation and its other complications. (3) Prevention, prophylaxis, and if necessary, adequate management are very important.     

Lessons from the skin--cutaneous features of familial cancer

As the molecular basis of disease continues to be elucidated, familial cancer syndromes, which consist of a range of neoplastic and non-neoplastic features, are emerging. The usual pathway of referral to a genetics clinic or familial cancer centre is via an oncologist, when high-risk features that suggest a possible hereditary basis for the presenting cancer are recognised. Traditionally, these high-risk features include more than two family members with similar cancers over two or more generations, a young age of onset, and more than one synchronous or metachronous tumour. These features are effective in ascertaining a substantial proportion of families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer due to a BRCA mutation, or the more common bowel-cancer predisposition syndromes, such as hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer and familial adenomatous polyposis. However, there are a range of familial cancer syndromes that are not easily detected and that can remain undiagnosed when history and examination are not extended to include non-malignant features. The identification of cutaneous signs associated with rare familial-cancer syndromes provides individuals and their families with the opportunity to undertake early surveillance for malignant and non-malignant complications that might in time be shown to improve outcomes.     

Lessons from the Atomic Bomb About Secondary MDS

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) is a hematological neoplasm defined by ineffective hematopoiesis, dysplasia of hematopoietic cells, and risk of progression to acute leukemia. MDS occurs as de novo or secondary, and chemoradiotherapy for cancers is thought to increase the risk of MDS among patients. Recently, an epidemiological study for MDS among A-bomb survivors was performed, and it clearly demonstrated that the exposure to external radiation significantly increased the risk of MDS. Precise epidemiological data among survivors have revealed important clinical factors related to the risk of leukemias. In this review, by comparing data for secondary MDS and leukemia/MDS among survivors, several factors which would affect the risk of MDS, especially secondary MDS, are discussed.     

Immunoconjugates: Lessons from animal models

Monoclonal antibody-mediated cancer therapy has evolved througha challenging chain of problems and solutions. The very limitedtherapeutic success obtained with unarmed monoclonal antibodieshas increased the interest in different antibody-based targetingstrategies, and numerous preclini- cal and even clinical studieswith immunoconjugates have now been conducted. We comment hereon the messages implicit in a recent report on a doxorubicin-anti-carcinomaantibody conjugate and from several other studies. immunoconjugates, monoclonal antibodies, pre-clinical models     

Lessons learned from independent central review

Independent central review (ICR) is advocated by regulatory authorities as a means of independent verification of clinical trial end-points dependent on medical imaging, when the data from the trials may be submitted for licensing applications [Food and Drug Administration. United States food and drug administration guidance for industry: clinical trial endpoints for the approval of cancer drugs and biologics. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2006; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 21-492 (oxaliplatin). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 21-923 (sorafenib tosylate). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2005; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 22-065 (ixabepilone). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for application number NDA 22-059 (lapatinib ditosylate). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; United States Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Approval package for BLA numbers 97-0260 and BLA Number 97-0244 (rituximab). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997; United States Food and Drug Administration. FDA clinical review of BLA 98-0369 (Herceptin^® trastuzumab (rhuMAb HER2)). FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 1998; United States Food and Drug Administration. FDA Briefing Document Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee meeting NDA 21801 (satraplatin). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007; Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK, et al. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. JCO 2007(November):5210–7]. In addition, clinical trial sponsors have used ICR in Phase I–II studies to assist in critical pathway decisions including in-licensing of compounds [Cannistra SA, Matulonis UA, Penson RT, et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. JCO 2007(November):5180–6; Perez EA, Lerzo G, Pivot X, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a phase II study of patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. JCO 2007(August):3407–14; Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. JCO 2007(June):2171–7; Ghassan KA, Schwartz L, Ricci S, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. JCO 2006(September):4293–300; Boué F, Gabarre J, GaBarre J, et al. Phase II trial of CHOP plus rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. JCO 2006(September):4123–8; Chen HX, Mooney M, Boron M, et al. Phase II multicenter trial of bevacizumab plus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer: an NCI Treatment Referral Center Trial TRC-0301. JCO 2006(July):3354–60; Ratain MJ, Eisen T, Stadler WM, et al. Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JCO 2006(June):2502–12; Jaffer AA, Lee FC, Singh DA, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. JCO 2006(February):663–7; Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive Group Study—FFCD 9803. JCO 2004(November):4319–28]. This article will focus on the definition and purpose of ICR and the issues and lessons learned in the ICR setting primarily in Phase II and III oncology studies. This will include a discussion on discordance between local and central interpretations, consequences of ICR, reader discordance during the ICR, operational considerations and the need for specific imaging requirements as part of the study protocol.     

Safety of the Anti-CD19 antibody Tafasitamab in Long Term Responders from A Phase II Trial for Relapsed Lymphoma

Background: Information about the long-term tolerability of tafasitamab is still limited. Methods: 5 of 92 patients treated within a phase IIa study of single-agent tafasitamab in relapsed or refractory B NHL were followed for up to five years or longer for long-term tolerability. Results: Treatment was very well tolerated in an outpatient setting with no hospitalizations needed and mild and tolerable adverse events that occurred mostly within the first two years of treatment. Conclusions: Given the excellent tolerability and efficacy of tafasitamab this agent can be used to induce remission in relapsed or refractory lymphoma either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.     

Responders benefit from neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results of a prospective phase-II trial.

BACKGROUND: We present the results of a prospective phase-II-study of neoadjuvant combined radiochemotherapy followed by surgical resection in patients with histological proven locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus located at or above the level of the tracheal bifurcation. METHODOLOGY: Between February 1995 and March 2000 a total of 76 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (uT3/4N0/+-categories) received simultaneous combined neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy consisting of a continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day) 7 day per week concurrently with conventional fractioned external beam radiation therapy (2 Gy/day), five fractions per week up to a total dose of 30 Gy. RESULTS: Radiochemotherapy related acute severe toxicity rate (CTC-grade-III) occurred in 34 patients, two patients died. Sixty-four patients underwent surgery with a complete resection in 48 patients. Three patients died during a 90-day post-operative course. The histopathological workup revealed no viable residual tumour cells in eight patients (ypCR) and according to the modified criteria of Mandard in 26 patients a histopathological response. Twenty-two of these patients underwent a R0-resection. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years with an overall median survival time of 20.6 months. The median survival in the 26 responders was 32.3 months versus 19.5 months in 38 non-responders (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, who respond to preoperative neoadjuvant combined radiochemotherapy, seem to have more benefit from subsequent resection than non-responding patients.     

Lessons from multidisciplinary translational trials on anti-angiogenic therapy of cancer

The importance of multidisciplinary translational clinical trials is obvious; however, making them work is complex and challenging. Here I present an argument for designing and implementing multidisciplinary mechanistic trials and present the lessons our team at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center has learned from two such trials in cancer patients with locally advanced rectal carcinomas and recurrent glioblastomas.