Single- versus multi-detector row CT of the brain: quality assessment

PURPOSE: To assess the quality of brain computed tomographic (CT) studies obtained with a four-channel multi-detector row CT scanner compared with those obtained with a single-detector row CT scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients referred for brain CT were imaged with both single- and multi-detector row scanners. Single-detector row CT images were acquired by using a 5-mm-collimated beam in the transverse mode. Multi-detector row CT images were acquired in four simultaneous 2.5-mm-thick sections, which were combined in projection space to create two contiguous 5-mm-thick sections. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the acquisition technique independently evaluated the CT image pairs, which were presented in a stacked mode on two adjacent monitors. Each study was graded by using a five-point scale for posterior fossa artifact, overall image quality, and overall preference. RESULTS: Multi-detector row CT studies were acquired 1.8 times faster than single-detector row CT studies (0.92 vs 0.52 section per second). Multi-detector row CT posterior fossa artifact was less than single-detector row CT posterior fossa artifact in 87 (93%) of 94 studies. Overall preference was expressed for multi-detector row CT in 84 (89%) of 94 studies. The differences in mean posterior fossa artifact scores (P <.001) and mean overall image quality scores (P =.001) were significant. CONCLUSION: Brain CT images obtained with multi-detector row CT resulted in significantly less posterior fossa artifact and were preferred to single-detector row CT images.     

Ablation margin assessment of liver tumors with intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm computed tomography

AIM:To determine the influence of anthropomorphic parameters on the relationship between patient centering,mean computed tomography(CT) numbers and quantitative image noise in abdominal CT.METHODS:Our Institutional Review Board approved study included 395 patients(age range 21-108,years;male:female = 195:200) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT on a 16-section multi-detector row scanner(GE LightSpeed 16).Patient centering in the gantry isocenter was measured from the lateral localizer radiograph(off center S = patient off centered superior to isocenter;off center I = patient off centered inferior to isocenter).Mean CT numbers(Hounsfield Units:HU) and noise(standard deviation of CT numbers:SD) were measured in the anterior(aHU,aSD) and posterior(pHU,pSD) abdominal wall subcutaneous fat and liver parenchyma(LivHU,LivSD) at the level of the porta hepatis.Patients’ age,gender,weight,body mass index and maximal anteroposterior diameter were recorded.The data were analyzed using linear regression analysis.RESULTS:Most patients(81%;320/395) were not correctly centered in the gantry isocenter for abdominal CT scanning.Mean CT numbers in the abdominal wall increased significantly with an increase in the offcentering distance,regardless of the direction of the off-center(P < 0.05).There was a substantial increase in pSD(P = 0.01) and LivSD(P = 0.017) with off-centering.Change in mean CT numbers and image noise along the off-center distance was influenced by the patient size(P < 0.01).CONCLUSION:Inappropriate patient centering for CT scanning adversely affects the reliability of mean CT numbers and image noise.     

Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to compare the radiation dose profile between computed tomography (CT) with a single detector row (SD) and with a multi-detector row (MD) and (b) to compare specific organ doses between SD CT and MD CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed within a 32-cm-diameter cylindrical phantom were used to measure and compare dose profiles from one SD CT scanner and from one MD CT scanner. SD CT scanning parameters were 210 mA, 140 kVp, pitch of 1.0, 5-mm section thickness, and 0.8-second gantry rotation speed. MD CT scanning parameters were 130 mA, 140 kVp, pitch of 0.75, 4 x 5-mm section thickness, 15-mm table feed, and 0.8-second gantry rotation speed. To plot radiation dose profile, doses were measured both in the imaging plane and in the area adjacent to the imaging plane. The resultant data were normalized to achieve constant image noise between MD CT and SD CT. Direct doses to individual organs from primary and scattered radiation were measured with an anthropomorphic phantom containing thermoluminescent dosimeters and with a standard pelvic imaging protocol for both MD CT and SD CT. RESULTS: MD CT resulted in a dose profile approximately 27% higher than that from SD CT in the plane of imaging (8.0 vs 6.3 mGy) and 69% higher adjacent to the plane of imaging (6.8 vs 4.0 mGy). The individual doses to the kidneys, uterus, ovaries, and pelvic bone marrow were 92%-180% higher with MD CT than with SD CT. CONCLUSION: With image noise constant between SD CT and MD CT, the radiation dose profile both inside and outside the plane of imaging was higher with MD CT than with SD CT. Organ dose also was higher with MD CT than with SD CT. This difference should be accounted for in the design of MD CT protocols, especially as MD CT technology becomes more widely available for clinical use.     

Technical principles of dual source CT

During the past years, multi-detector row CT (MDCT) has evolved into clinical practice with a rapid increase of the number of detector slices. Today's 64 slice CT systems allow whole-body examinations with sub-millimeter resolution in short scan times. As an alternative to adding even more detector slices, we describe the system concept and design of a CT scanner with two X-ray tubes and two detectors (mounted on a CT gantry with a mechanical offset of 90 degrees) that has the potential to overcome limitations of conventional MDCT systems, such as temporal resolution for cardiac imaging. A dual source CT (DSCT) scanner provides temporal resolution equivalent to a quarter of the gantry rotation time, independent of the patient's heart rate (83 ms at 0.33 s rotation time). In addition to the benefits for cardiac scanning, it allows to go beyond conventional CT imaging by obtaining dual energy information if the two tubes are operated at different voltages. Furthermore, we discuss how both acquisition systems can be used to add the power reserve of two X-ray tubes for long scan ranges and obese patients. Finally, future advances of DSCT are highlighted.     

Multiplanar and 3D imaging of the central airways: comparison of image quality and radiation dose of single-detector row CT and multi-detector row CT at differing tube currents in dogs

PURPOSE: To compare in an animal model the image quality of multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction images of the central airways by using single-detector row computed tomography (CT) and multi-detector row CT at varied tube currents and to compare radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five dogs each underwent five consecutive helical CT examinations (one single-detector row CT examination at 240 mA and four multi-detector row CT examinations at 240, 120, 40, and 20 mA), with 0.8-second gantry rotation time. Multiplanar reformation and 3D reconstruction images were created from each of the 25 CT acquisitions. The images were randomized and blindly reviewed with consensus agreement by three radiologists who graded image quality by using a five-point scale. In a separate review, the three radiologists independently used a four-point scale to rank the comparative image quality of the multi-detector row CT 3D images, while blinded to specific tube currents. The radiation doses were measured for each type of scan, and the relative radiation dose length products that were normalized to single-detector row CT values were used to compare radiation doses of the various CT techniques. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Friedman analysis of variance test. RESULTS: Image quality was consistently ranked higher for multi-detector row CT images than for single-detector row CT images (P =.03). Although there were no distinguishable differences between images obtained with multi-detector row CT at 240, 120, or 40 mA, images obtained with 20 mA were given a significantly (P =.04) lower relative rank (mean, 2.4) than those obtained with higher tube currents (mean, 1.4-1.7). Multi-detector row CT radiation doses were 1.64, 0.82, 0.27, and 0.14 (for 240-, 120-, 40-, and 20-mA multi-detector row CT, respectively) relative to the dose for 240-mA single-detector row CT. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT is superior to single-detector row CT for multiplanar and 3D imaging of the central airways. Substantial dose reductions can be made, while maintaining high image quality.     

Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis

PURPOSE: To compare image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and radiation exposure associated with 16-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) examinations of abdomen and pelvis performed with z-axis modulation technique of automatic tube current modulation and with manual selection of fixed tube current. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive subjects (mean age, 60 years; age range, 19-84 years; male-to-female ratio, 35:27) underwent follow-up CT of abdomen and pelvis with use of a 16-section multi-detector row scanner and z-axis modulation technique (10.5-12.0-HU noise index, 10-380 mA). Scanning parameters included 140 kVp, 0.5-1.0-second gantry rotation time, 0.938:1 beam pitch, and 5-mm reconstructed section thickness. For each subject, images obtained with z-axis modulation were compared with previous images obtained with fixed tube current (200-300 mA) and with other parameters identical. Images were compared for noise and diagnostic acceptability by two subspecialty radiologists using a five-point scale (1, unacceptable; 3, acceptable; 5, excellent) at five levels: upper liver at diaphragm, porta hepatis, right kidney hilum, iliac crest, and upper margin of acetabulum. Tube current and gantry rotation time used for acquisitions at these levels were recorded. Data were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. RESULTS: Although no significant differences were found (P =.34), images acquired with z-axis modulation at the levels of the upper liver (diaphragm) and acetabulum had a higher noise and lower diagnostic quality, compared with images acquired with fixed tube current. Compared with fixed tube current, z-axis modulation resulted in tube current-time product reduction in 54 (87%) of 62 examinations (mean reduction, 71.2 mAs) and increase in eight (13%) (mean increase, 17.0 mAs). CONCLUSION: Compared with manually selected fixed tube current, z-axis automatic tube current modulation resulted in reduced tube current-time product and similar image noise and diagnostic acceptability at CT of abdomen and pelvis.     

Technical principles of dual source CT

During the past years, multi-detector row CT (MDCT) has evolved into clinical practice with a rapid increase of the number of detector slices. Today's 64 slice CT systems allow whole-body examinations with sub-millimeter resolution in short scan times. As an alternative to adding even more detector slices, we describe the system concept and design of a CT scanner with two X-ray tubes and two detectors (mounted on a CT gantry with a mechanical offset of 90°) that has the potential to overcome limitations of conventional MDCT systems, such as temporal resolution for cardiac imaging. A dual source CT (DSCT) scanner provides temporal resolution equivalent to a quarter of the gantry rotation time, independent of the patient's heart rate (83 ms at 0.33 s rotation time). In addition to the benefits for cardiac scanning, it allows to go beyond conventional CT imaging by obtaining dual energy information if the two tubes are operated at different voltages. Furthermore, we discuss how both acquisition systems can be used to add the power reserve of two X-ray tubes for long scan ranges and obese patients. Finally, future advances of DSCT are highlighted.     

Detection of intracranial aneurysms: multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the effectiveness of multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography with that of conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) used to detect intracranial aneurysms in patients with nontraumatic acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive adult patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage were recruited into the institutional review board-approved study and gave informed consent. All patients underwent both multi-detector row CT angiography and DSA no more than 12 hours apart. CT angiography was performed with a multi-detector row scanner (four detector rows) by using collimation of 1.25 mm and pitch of 3. Images were interpreted at computer workstations in a blinded fashion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CT images, and two other radiologists independently reviewed the DSA images. The presence and location of aneurysms were rated on a five-point scale for certainty. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated independently for image interpretation performed by the two CT image readers and the second DSA image reader by using the first DSA reader's interpretation as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 26 aneurysms were detected at DSA in 21 patients, and no aneurysms were detected in 14 patients. Sensitivity and specificity for CT angiography were, respectively, 90% and 93% for reader 1 and 81% and 93% for reader 2. The mean diameter of aneurysms detected on CT angiographic images was 4.4 mm, and the smallest aneurysm detected was 2.2 mm in diameter. Aneurysms that were missed at initial interpretation of CT angiographic images were identified at retrospective reading. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT angiography has high sensitivity and specificity for detection of intracranial aneurysms, including small aneurysms, in patients with nontraumatic acute subarachnoid hemorrhage.     

Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT

PURPOSE: To compare coronary artery calcium scores from a multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) scanner with those from an electron-beam CT scanner, with emphasis on subjects with calcium scores less than 400. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight asymptomatic subjects (37 women, 41 men; age range, 39-78 years; mean age, 54.2 years) underwent multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Volume and Agatston scores were calculated with a workstation. Statistical analyses included assessment of association between calcium scores from two scanners, calculation of percent absolute difference to assess score variability between scanners, equivalence analysis, construction of Bland-Altman plots to assess agreement between scores, and assessment of changes in score grouping and risk criteria based on score differences between scanners. RESULTS: Electron-beam CT calcium scores were higher than multi-detector row CT scores. Linear association between calcium scores obtained from paired scans was significant (r = 0.96-0.99, P <.001). Mean percent absolute differences were 67.9% and 65.0% for volume and Agatston scores, respectively (48.6% and 46.3% for corresponding natural log-transformed scores). In subjects with a score of 11 or greater, mean percent absolute differences between electron-beam CT and multi-detector row CT scores ranged from 15% to 30% (<10% for natural log-transformed calcium scores). With a 20% equivalence limit, calcium scores from the two scanners were statistically equivalent (P <.05). Score grouping would have been subject to change in 12 (11 increased and one decreased; six with scores of 11 or greater), and possible risk management decisions would have been subject to change in eight (16%) of 51 subjects who underwent electron-beam CT versus multi-detector row CT scanning. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT appears to be comparable to electron-beam CT for coronary calcification screening, except in subjects with a calcium score less than 11.     

Multi-detector row CT: principles and practice for abdominal applications

Abdominal imaging with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) can be performed during short breath holds. On 16-channel multi-detector row CT scanners, the effective detector row thickness, depending on the manufacturer, is typically 1.0-1.5 mm, which results in a beam collimation of 16-24 mm. At a gantry rotation speed of 0.5 second and a pitch of 1, the table travel speed will be 32-48 mm/sec. At a smaller effective detector row thickness and a narrower beam collimation, a slightly higher pitch may be needed to obtain short-breath-hold CT scans. Typically, transverse scans are viewed at a reconstructed section thickness of 3-5 mm, with thinner sections used for CT angiography and whenever off-axial reformations are obtained. The radiologic technique should be optimized according to the transverse section thickness used for interpretation, and the contrast material administration protocol should be optimized according to the clinical problem, with the scanning triggered for enhancement of a target organ.     

Anterior spinal artery and artery of Adamkiewicz detected by using multi-detector row CT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz (AKA) and the anterior spinal artery (ASA) by using multi-detector row CT. Preoperative detection of the AKA and ASA is important for prevention of ischemic complications of thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. METHODS: Data from contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen of 19 consecutive patients with known or suspected liver disease were evaluated. The scanning range was set from the level of the diaphragm to the lower edge of the liver. After bolus injection of contrast material (100 mL of iohexol, 350 mgI/mL, 5 mL/s), arterial phase scans were obtained by using a four-channel multi-detector row CT scanner. The scanning parameters included a detector row configuration of 4 x 2 mm, a pitch of 5:1, a gantry rotation speed of 0.5 s, 120 kVp, and 150 mAs. Arterial phase coronal multiplanar reconstruction scans obtained parallel to the spinal cord were evaluated by two neuroradiologists. The detectability of ASA and AKA was analyzed. RESULTS: The AKA was visualized on the scans of 13 of 19 patients (68%). The segmental level of AKA origin ranged from T10 to L2. The AKA originated from the left side in nine patients (69%) and the right side in four patients (31%). The ASA was visualized on the scans of all patients (100%). For 16 of the 19 patients, the ASA was detected in its full length from the cranial edge of the scan range. However, the ascending branch of the ASA distal to the junction of the AKA was not detected for the remaining three patients. CONCLUSION: The AKA and ASA can be visualized by using multi-detector row CT with the use of IV administered contrast material. Multi-detector row CT could be a useful tool in the evaluation of spinal vascular structures.     

Spatial variation of resolution and noise in multi-detector row spiral CT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to evaluate an approach for measuring the variations of three-dimensional spatial resolution and image noise throughout a field of view imaged with multi-detector row spiral computed tomographic (CT) scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors designed a phantom (diameter, 320 mm) that contained 37 metallic spheres (diameter, approximately 0.8 mm) positioned between two disks made of a material with attenuation being that of water. One sphere was located at the isocenter of the phantom, and the rest were evenly spaced in three concentric rings with diameters of 100, 200, and 300 mm, respectively. The phantom was imaged with two widely used multi-detector row CT scanners by using a standard protocol and four variations of that protocol. Because a recently developed theory holds that image resolution should be proportional to the square root of the trace of the covariance matrix of a point spread function, the authors developed a software package to segment high-attenuation spheres from the CT image volume and compute point spread functions from blurred images of the spheres. Three-dimensional spatial resolution and image noise were calculated as a function of radial distance within the field of view. RESULTS: Resolution and noise were quantified in the resultant CT image volumes and found to be nonisotropic, with worse resolution and less noise occurring at the periphery of the field of view. CONCLUSION: The method enabled measurement of variations in spatial resolution and of their distribution on images obtained with multi-detector row CT scanners. These findings may contribute to the development of an improved algorithm for image reconstruction.     

T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of serosal invasion in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Ethics Committee does not require approval or informed consent for retrospective studies. Forty-one consecutive patients (24 men, 17 women; mean age, 68 years) with gastric cancer were included in this study. All patients were given 600 mL of tap water to drink and were positioned prone or supine on the scanning table. The detector row configuration included four detector rows, a section thickness of 1.25 mm, a pitch of 6, and a reconstruction interval of 0.63 mm. Transverse and multiplanar reconstruction images were simultaneously evaluated by two independent observers to assess the depth of tumor invasion in the gastric wall (ie, T stage). T staging at multi-detector row CT was compared with T staging at histologic evaluation (reference standard), which was performed by means of surgical or histologic examination of the resected specimen. We also calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multi-detector row CT for each observer in the assessment of serosal invasion. RESULTS: Analysis of interobserver agreement showed substantial or almost perfect agreement (nonweighted kappa value of 0.78 and weighted kappa value of 0.85). Correct assessment of gastric wall invasion was 80% and 85% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multi-detector row CT in the assessment of serosal invasion were 90%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, for observer 1 and 80%, 97%, and 93%, respectively, for observer 2. Overstaging occurred in six patients, and understaging occurred in five patients. All understaged tumors were scirrhous subtype gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT scanning of patients with gastric cancer gave 93% accuracy in the assessment of serosal invasion in patients with gastric cancer.     

Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the dose performance of a 64-channel multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) scanner and a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner from the same manufacturer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To minimize dose in the cardiac (dual-source) mode, the evaluated dual-source CT system uses a cardiac beam-shaping filter, three-dimensional adaptive noise reduction, heart rate-dependent pitch, and electrocardiographically based modulation of the tube current. Weighted CT dose index per 100 mAs was measured for the head, body, and cardiac beam-shaping filters. Kerma-length product was measured in the spiral cardiac mode at four pitch values and three electrocardiographic modulation temporal windows. Noise was measured in an anthropomorphic phantom. Data were compared with data from a 64-channel multi-detector row CT scanner. RESULTS: For the multi-detector row and dual-source CT systems, respectively, weighted CT dose index per 100 mAs was 14.2 and 12.2 mGy (head CT), 6.8 and 6.4 mGy (body CT), and 6.8 and 5.3 mGy (cardiac CT). In the spiral cardiac mode (no electrocardiographically based tube current modulation, 0.2 pitch), equivalent noise occurred at volume CT dose index values of 23.7 and 35.0 mGy (coronary artery calcium CT) and 58.9 and 61.2 mGy (coronary CT angiography) for multi-detector row CT and dual-source CT, respectively. The use of heart rate-dependent pitch values reduced volume CT dose index to 46.2 mGy (0.265 pitch), 34.0 mGy (0.36 pitch), and 26.6 mGy (0.46 pitch) compared with 61.2 mGy for 0.2 pitch. The use of electrocardiographically based tube current-modulation and temporal windows of 110, 210, and 310 msec further reduced volume CT dose index to 9.1-25.1 mGy, dependent on the heart rate. CONCLUSION: For electrocardiographically gated coronary CT angiography, image noise equivalent to that of multi-detector row CT can be achieved with dual-source CT at doses comparable to or up to a factor of two lower than the doses at multi-detector row CT, depending on heart rate of the patient.     

Identification of the anterior ethmoid arteries on thin-section axial images and coronal reformatted orbit images by means of multidetector row CT

AIM: The aim of this study was to identify anterior ethmoid arteries on thin-section axial images and coronal reformatted images of the orbits using multidetector row computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients underwent paranasal CT using a 16-row detector CT (n=59) or a 6-row detector CT machine (n=73) at 1 or 1.25 mm section width, respectively. Coronal images were reformatted at section widths of 3 and 1 mm. The anterior ethmoid arteries were identified for each patient. Differences were assessed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: All CT images were of approximately average diagnostic quality. Anterior ethmoid arteries were identified in 97.5 and 96.6% at section thicknesses of 1 and 1.25 mm on the axial images, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate (p=0.89). On the coronal images, anterior ethmoid arteries were presented tangentially in 75.4 and 90.2% at section widths of 3 and 1 mm, respectively. The visibility of the anterior ethmoid arteries was rated significantly better on coronal images at a section width of 1 mm than on those at section widths of 3 mm (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Thin-section axial images and coronal reformatted images using multi-detector row CT mostly depict anterior ethmoid arteries, and are useful to identify anterior ethmoid arteries for preoperative evaluation of paranasal sinuses.     

Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT.

PURPOSE: To compare vascular conspicuity and ability to connect pulmonary arterial branches on pulmonary angiograms obtained with helical multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) with those on pulmonary angiograms obtained with helical single-detector row CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 93 consecutive patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism, 48 underwent scanning with multi-detector row CT and 45 with single-detector row CT; scans were obtained in 9 seconds and 28 seconds with 2.5-mm and 3.0-mm collimation, respectively. The lungs were divided into three zones: central, middle, and peripheral. Two independent observers used five-point grading scales. RESULTS: Conspicuity of pulmonary arteries in the central zone was ranked equal (median of 5), but in the middle and peripheral zones it was significantly higher at multi-detector row CT than at single-detector row CT (median 5 vs 4 and 4 vs 3, P < .001, respectively). In addition, multi-detector row CT improved the ability to connect peripheral arteries with their more centrally located pulmonary artery of origin in the peripheral but not the middle zone on transverse images and in both zones on multiplanar images. Viewing with a modified window setting (width, 1,000 HU; level, -100 HU) significantly increased pulmonary arterial conspicuity. Contrast material column in the pulmonary arteries was significantly more homogeneous at multi-detector row CT. CONCLUSION: Use of multi-detector row CT significantly improves pulmonary arterial visualization in the middle and peripheral lung zones.     

Truncated-view artifacts: clinical importance on CT

A truncated-view artifact in CT is produced whenever any part of the patient or imaged object is present in some but not all of the views obtained for a slice. The potential to create images with this artifact exists for any CT scanner in which the fan beam (or its equivalent) does not cover the entire gantry aperture. This includes most CT systems currently on the market. Although the artifact may not create a severe visual disturbance in the image, it can alter the CT numbers in a manner that will compromise the accuracy of quantitative analyses. This report describes the nature of the truncated-view artifact and presents simulated examples for both mathematical phantoms and clinical scans. The artifact can be eliminated by assuring that the entire patient and all foreign objects are included in the field of view, or it can be minimized by placing objects that cannot be entirely within the field of view as close to the edge of the gantry aperture as possible.     

Orthopedic hardware complications diagnosed with multi-detector row CT

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for the depiction of orthopedic hardware complications in the spine and appendicular skeleton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; patient informed consent was not required. Results of 114 multi-detector row CT studies performed because of possible hardware complications in 109 patients (57 men, 52 women; mean age, 44 years; age range, 12-82 years) were available for analysis. The CT studies were retrospectively reviewed and compared with clinical or surgical outcomes, which were used as the reference standard. In another experiment, detection of hardware complications on radiographs and multi-detector row CT images was compared between two readers for selected cases (18 positive and 26 negative) by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods. RESULTS: For 91 (80%) of 114 multi-detector row CT studies, the complication status could be determined on the basis of clinical or surgical outcomes. Twenty-three multi-detector row CT studies were confirmed to be positive (revealing 10 cases of nonunion, five cases of hardware malplacement, three cases of hardware loosening, three perihardware fractures, and two chronic infections), and 57 were confirmed to be negative. There were three false-positive and eight false-negative multi-detector row CT studies. With clinical or surgical outcomes as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of multi-detector row CT were 74% (23 of 31 studies), 95% (57 of 60 studies), 88% (23 of 26 studies), and 88% (57 of 65 studies), respectively. Results of ROC analysis indicated that detection of hardware complications was much lower with radiography than with multi-detector row CT (area under ROC curve, 0.84 vs 1.00; F = 4.69, df = 1, 43; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT is an effective tool for depicting orthopedic hardware complications.     

Clinical potentials of the prototype 256-detector row CT-scanner

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical potentials of the 256-detector row computed tomography (CT) in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy males (22-63 years) participated in the present study. They underwent a noncontrast-enhanced examination with a contiguous axial scan mode either for head, chest, abdomen, or pelvis. Dose was the same as routinely used for multislice CT examinations. Image quality was interpreted by three board-certified radiologists. RESULTS: With the 256-detector row CT, 0.5-0.8 mm isotropic volumetric data could be acquired in one rotation. Main promising findings are as follows. Three-dimensional structures were visualized clearly in the multiple planes without secondary reconstruction, whereas the axial images had nearly the same image quality as conventional CT. Shading or streak artifacts were observed at the edge of the scan region. The latter are also known as Feldkamp artifacts. Coronal chest images showed a motion artifact from the heart beating. CONCLUSION: The 256-detector row CT promises to be useful in clinical applications with its ability to provide three-dimensional visualization of fine structures. The Feldkamp artifacts observed did not generally affect interpretation of images. Investigations are now continuing on image correction along the craniocaudal direction to improve the overall image quality.     

肺部疾病的支气管动脉与肺外体循环动脉CTA分析

目的:利用CT血管造影对支气管动脉与肺外体循环动脉进行肺供血研究。材料和方法:回顾性分析16层CT胸部增强发现肺外体循环动脉参与供血的不同肺疾病患者39例(男性24例,女性15例,平均年龄63.4岁;范围,20-82岁),采用容积显示(VR)、多平面重建(MPR)、最大强度投影(MIP)进行支气管动脉与肺外体循环动脉进行重建,分析其供血特征。结果:39例病人中共显示支气管动脉128支,肺外体循环动脉42支,其中内乳动脉19支,锁骨下动脉8支,膈下动脉8支,肋间动脉5支,甲状颈干与腹腔干各1支。35支肺外体循环动脉扩张迂曲进入肺内。5例支气管扩张和1例肺癌中扩张迂曲的支气管动脉与肺外体循环动脉形成明显的交通吻合成网状,7例支气管扩张中支气管动脉、肺外体循环动脉与肺动脉间形成吻合。除1例肺隔离症没有伴明显胸膜增厚外,其余肺外体循环动脉穿过胸壁进入肺内均伴有明显的胸膜增厚。结论:CTA并三维重建技术能清晰显示支气管动脉肺外体循环动脉的起源、分布等解剖特征,为介入术提供明确路径,有利于疾病的诊断与治疗。