Proctocolectomy with jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis: An alternative to ileal pouch reconstruction

The aim of this study was to determine whether a jejunal pouch would have a lower resting pressure, be more distensible, and have more interdigestive migrating myoelectric complexes and less fecal bacterial overgrowth than would an ileal pouch after proctocolectomy and pouch-distal rectal anastomosis. In six conscious dogs with a jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis and six with an ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis (controls), pouch distensibility and motility were measured using a barostat and perfused pressure-sensitive catheters passed per anum, pouch electrical activity was recorded using chronically implanted electrodes, and the number of bacteria per gram of stool was assessed by culture. Dogs with a jejunal pouch had lower resting pouch pressures, more distensible pouches, faster frequencies of pacesetter potentials in the pouch, more phase 3 intervals of the interdigesive migrating myoelectric complex reaching the pouch, but similar numbers and types of bacteria in their stools compared to the dogs with an ileal pouch. We concluded that jejunal pouches have a lower resting pressure, are more distensible, have more cleansing contractions, but a similar fecal flora compared to ileal pouches. A jejunal pouch has features that make it an attractive alternative to an ileal pouch for pouch-distal rectal or pouch-anal canal anastomosis after proctocolectomy. Supported by the Mayo Foundation, Tohoku University, and the Nigro grant. Presented at the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Washington, D.C., May 11–14, 1997. An abstract of this work was published in Gastroenterology 112:A1478, 1997.     

Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The aim of our study was to determine whether ileal pouch motility and evacuability and the 24 hour fecal output influence stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In 23 patients, at a mean of 24 months postoperatively (range 22 to 26 months), ileal pouch motility was measured using an intraluminal bag and pressure-sensitive catheters. The pattern and efficiency of ileal pouch emptying was determined scintigraphically. A 24 hour stool collection was made and the stool output and stool frequency recorded. The volume of ileal pouch distention at which large amplitude propulsive waves appeared (the threshold volume) correlated closely with stool frequency. The larger the threshold volume, the fewer the stools per 24 hours (correlation coefficient -0.70; p less than 0.01). Also, the greater the 24 hour stool output, the greater the stool frequency (correlation coefficient 0.79, p less than 0.001). In contrast, the efficiency of ileal pouch evacuation was less strongly related to stool frequency (correlation coefficient -0.41, p = 0.05). We conclude that ileal pouch motility and stool output are major determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Inefficient pouch emptying is less commonly associated with frequent bowel movements.     

Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Bowel function varies markedly among patients with colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Little is known of the mechanisms controlling fecal continence and frequency of defecation after operation. The aim of this study was to determine which features of the anal sphincter and neorectum accounted for the variation in clinical outcome. Twenty patients were studied 4 to 35 months after operation and compared to 12 healthy volunteers. Despite several patients exhibiting impaired fecal continence, anal sphincteric length and pressures and ileal pouch capacity and distensibility were similar in patients and controls. Patients with poor results, however, had rapid filling of their ileal pouch, which resulted in early onset of high amplitude propulsive pressure waves in the pouch. As these waves became more frequent, defecation resulted. Patients with poor results also were not able to empty adequately their pouch. The poorer the completeness of evacuation, the more frequent the defecation (r = 0.62, p less than 0.01). The authors conclude that rapid pouch filling and impaired pouch evacuation can lead to increased stool frequency in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.     

Gastrointestinal transit after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or ileostomy

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis increases the frequency of stooling, perhaps due in part to the loss of an ileocecal or colonic braking effect on gastrointestinal transit. To assess whether colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or with ileostomy accelerates gastrointestinal transit, we studied 16 IPAA patients (mean +/- SEM stool frequency, 8 +/- 1 stools/day), 5 patients after colectomy and Brooke ileostomy, and 8 healthy, unoperated controls (1 +/- 1 stools/day). Gastric emptying of liquids and small bowel transit of chyme were measured concurrently with a dual isotope technique. Gastric emptying was similar among all groups. In contrast, postprandial small bowel transit of the head of a duodenal marker was slowed, not accelerated, in IPAA patients (178 +/- 26 min) compared to Brooke subjects (80 +/- 32 min, P less than 0.05) and controls (75 +/- 15 min, P less than 0.01). Maximal filling of both the ileal pouch (341 +/- 19 min) and the ileostomy bag (348 +/- 12 min) occurred later than filling of the colon in controls (243 +/- 32 min, P less than 0.01). Overall stool frequency did not correlate with small bowel transit in the ileoanal patients, but the two ileoanal subjects with greatest stool frequency (11 and 18 stools/day) had the earliest arrival of marker at the pouch. In conclusion, removal of the colon markedly slowed small bowel transit in most patients, although it did not alter gastric emptying of liquids. Creation of an ileal pouch and ileoanal anastomosis further slowed transit of the head of the meal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The jejunal pouch as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy

Our hypothesis was that a jejunal pouch used as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy would slow enteric transit, delay defecation, and decrease stool frequency compared to an ileal pouch so used. Twelve dogs underwent proctocolectomy; six had a jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis and six had an ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis. After recovery, postprandial mouth-to-anus transit was slower in jejunal pouch dogs (253 ±18 minutes [mean ± SEM]) than in ileal pouch dogs (112 ±7.9 minutes; P <0.05). Moreover, jejunal pouch dogs passed only 4.1 ± 0.3 stools during the 12 hours after eating, whereas ileal pouch dogs passed 6.3 ± 0.9 stools (P <0.05). The mean frequency of proximal ileal pacesetter potentials after feeding was less in jejunal pouch dogs (12 ± 0.4 cycles/min) than in ileal pouch dogs (16 ± 0.3 counts/min; P = 0.01), and jejunal pouches had more action potentials (jejunal = 82% ±4.3% of pacesetter potentials had action potentials, ileal = 61% ±3.0%; P <0.05). In contrast, gastric emptying and pouch motility, emptying, mucosal integrity, and bacteriologie and histologic properties were similar in the two groups of dogs. We concluded that the jejunal pouch operation slowed enteric transit, delayed defecation, and decreased postprandial stooling compared to the ileal pouch operation. Supported by the Ministry of Education and Sport (CAPES), Brasilia, Brazil. Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Ahmenrary Tract, May 16–10, 1999, Orlando, Fla., and published as an abstract in Gastmntemlogy 116-S1032, 1999.     

Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Comparison of performance status.

Although the clinical results of Brooke ileostomy are good, patients are permanently incontinent of stool and gas. Alternative operations designed to restore enteric continence, such as ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, must not only be as safe and effective as Brooke ileostomy, but should provide an improved quality of life in order to establish long-term acceptability. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has been performed safely and good functional results have been reported. The quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, however, has not been documented. Two hundred ninety-eight ileal pouch patients and 406 Brooke ileostomy patients who had the operations performed for chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis formed the basis of the study. After adjusting for age, diagnosis, and reoperation rate, logistic regression analysis of performance scores in seven different categories was used to discriminate between operations. Median follow-up was longer in Brooke ileostomy patients than in ileal pouch patients (104 months vs. 47 months, respectively), and Brooke ileostomy patients were slightly older (38 years vs. 32 years). A great majority of patients in each group were satisfied (93% Brooke ileostomy; 95% ileal pouch-anal anastomosis). Thirty-nine per cent of Brooke ileostomy patients, however, desired a change in the type of ileostomy they had. At 47 months, ileal pouch patients had a median of 5 stools per day and 1 at night, 77% did not experience any daytime incontinence, while 22% reported occasional spotting. In each performance category, the performance score discriminated between operations, with the probability of having had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis operation increasing with improvement in performance scores (p less than 0.05). We concluded that after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, patients experienced significant advantages in performing daily activities compared to patients with Brooke ileostomy and thus may experience a better quality of life. These results help further to establish ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as a safe, attractive, and valid alternative to Brooke ileostomy.     

Influence of ileal pouch capacity and anal sphincteric function on the clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

This study was designed to determine the influence of ileal pouch capacity and anal sphincteric function on the clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A total of 24 patients who had undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (J pouch) for ulcerative colitis were studied. The 24-hour stool frequency was found to be inversely correlated with the sensitivity threshold volume (STV), maximal tolerance volume (MTV), and distensibility, but was independent of the maximal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure. Patients experiencing nocturnal fecal incontinence had maximal resting pressures that were significantly lower than those of nocturnally continent patients. Among the patients with fecal incontinence, those with frequent soiling had lower resting pressures, STV, and distensibility than the patients with intermittent spotting. In addition, the STV in patients needing nocturnal evacuation were lower than those of patients who did not evacuate after falling asleep. The conclusions are as follows. Both stool frequency and the need for nocturnal pouch evacuation correlated directly with pouch volume. Anal incontinence was more common in patients with low internal sphincteric function. In addition, frequent and gross nocturnal incontinent patients demonstrate a worse function in both the anal sphincter and reservoir than those with intermittent spotting.     

Jejunal reservoir for pouch. Anal reconstruction

Jejunal reservoir for pouch. Anal reconstruction. For restaurative proctocolectomy the ileal J-pouch is a world-wide accepted procedure. In some cases the mesenteric vascular anatomy does not allow to bring the ileum down to the dentate line. In these patients a jejunal reservoir can be a good alternative. The different architecture of arteries and veins within the jejunal mesentery makes the bridging of a longer distance possible. Within a group of 38 restaurative proctocolectomies, jejunal pouch was performed in 2 cases. Failure of an ileal pouch was the reason in one patient. In the other, the ileal mesentery was too short to achieve a tension free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The functional result is good in both cases.     

Decreased levels of mucosal detoxification enzymes in the pouch of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND: Adenomas can develop in the pouch after colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) have a protective role in carcinogenesis. GST activity is much higher in the ileum than in the colon. The present study examined the hypothesis that the protective capacity of GSTs may be lowered as a result of colonic metaplasia of the ileal pouch. METHODS: Levels of GSTs, glutathione and cysteine, and the degree of inflammation and colonic metaplasia were quantified in biopsies from the pouch and afferent loop of 26 patients with FAP. RESULTS: GST enzyme activity, and levels of GST alpha, glutathione and cysteine in the pouch were significantly lower than those in the afferent loop (308 versus 398 nmol per min per mg protein (P<0.001), 4604 versus 5286 ng per mg protein (P=0.010), 27.1 versus 34.8 nmol per mg protein (P=0.023) and 0 versus 4.8 nmol per mg protein (P=0.009) respectively). No correlation was found between inflammation or colonic metaplasia of the pouch and GST enzyme activity in the pouch. CONCLUSION: After IPAA, GST detoxification activity in the pouch is significantly lower than that in the afferent ileal loop, which may promote tumorigenesis.     

Anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn. Estado actual

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the standard surgical procedure for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis of the colon. Nevertheless, its use in Crohn's disease patients remains controversial. A review was carried out in order to determine the present scientific evidence on the usefulness of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in Crohn's disease patients. There are no clinical trials analysing this issue. Scientific evidence is based on case series and retrospective studies. Most authors agree that Crohn's disease remains a contraindication for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, due to the high rate of complications and pouch failure. Nevertheless, a small group of authors consider ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as a good alternative for selected Crohn's disease patients. Both groups agree that if the pouch can be preserved, functional results are good.According to our review, current scientific evidence does not recommend ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn's disease patients.     

Pathologic features and clinical significance of "backwash" ileitis in ulcerative colitis

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may develop inflammation in the distal ileum thought to be due to "backwash" of cecal contents ("backwash ileitis"). However, a systematic analysis of ileal changes in UC has never been performed, and the prevalence and criteria for "backwash" ileitis have not been defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and spectrum of inflammatory changes in the ileum in patients with UC and to correlate ileal changes with outcome after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Routinely processed ileocolonic resection specimens from 200 consecutive patients with clinically and pathologically confirmed UC were evaluated for a wide variety of pathologic features in the ileum and colon. The ileal data were correlated with both the clinical features and the pathologic findings in the colon. Follow-up data were obtained to confirm absence of Crohn's disease and to evaluate outcome of ileo-anal pouches. Overall, 34 of 200 (17%) UC patients had inflammatory changes in the ileum (male/female ratio, 16/18; mean age, 42 years); 32 of 34 (94%) had pancolitis, which was significantly higher than the rate of pancolitis (39%) in patients without ileal disease (N = 166) (P < 0.001), but there were no other differences between patients with or without ileal pathology. In the colon, 22 of 34 (65%) patients had severe activity. Ileal changes included villous atrophy and crypt regeneration without increased inflammation (N = 3), increased neutrophilic and mononuclear inflammation in the lamina propria (N = 6), patchy cryptitis and crypt abscesses (N = 21) and focal superficial surface erosions (N = 4), some with pyloric metaplasia (N = 2 of 4). In general, the severity of ileal changes paralleled the severity of colonic activity. However, 2 of 4 (50%) patients with superficial erosions in the ileum had subtotal or left-sided colitis only, and had only mild colonic activity. Other cases showed only mild to moderate colonic activity and patchy or discontinuous involvement of the distal ileum. Upon follow-up of patients with erosions (mean, 48.5 months; range, 26-102 months), none developed manifestations of Crohn's disease anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. The presence of inflammatory changes in the ileum had no effect on the prevalence of pouch complications or on the occurrence of dysplasia or cancer. Ileal changes in UC are not uncommon (prevalence, 17%), are generally mild in nature (villous atrophy, increased inflammation, scattered crypt abscesses), and are not associated with an increased rate of ileo-anal pouch complications, dysplasia, or carcinoma. In some cases, our findings are consistent with a backwash etiology. However, rarely, ileal erosions may occur in patients without cecal involvement, which may indicate that other pathogenetic mechanisms should be considered in the etiology of ileitis in UC patients.     

A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomoses

The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis improves clinical results after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy compared to the straight ileoanal anastomosis. The question was what physiologic changes brought about by the pouch led to the improvement. Among 124 patients who had had ileoanal anastomosis, 25 volunteered for a detailed clinicophysiologic evaluation. Fourteen had had the ileal pouch-anal operation a mean of 8 months previously, and 11 had the straight ileoanal operation a mean of 25 months previously. Both groups of patients had satisfactory anal sphincter resting pressures (mean +/- SEM, pouch = 68 +/- 8 cm H2O, straight = 65 +/- 9 cm H2O, p greater than 0.05) and neorectal capacities (pouch = 278 +/- 26 ml, straight = 233 +/- 36 ml, p less than 0.05), and all could evacuate spontaneously. However, the pouch patients had a more distensible neorectum (delta V/delta P pouch = 9.5 +/- 1.3 ml/cm H2O, straight = 4.9 +/- 0.9 ml/cm H2O, p less than 0.05) and smaller amplitude neorectal contractions (pouch = 36 +/- 5 cm H2O, straight = 90 +/- 13 cm H2O; p less than 0.05). We concluded that the pouch-anal anastomosis increased the distensibility of the neorectum and decreased its propulsive drive, and so improved clinical results.     

Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Seventeen patients were studied 3-31 months (median 6.4 months) after mucosal proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (n = 15) or adenomatous polyposis (n = 2). Seven had a triplicated pouch, and ten a duplicated pouch. Clinical bowel function was determined by detailed questionnaire, and correlations sought between clinical end-points such as frequency of defaecation, urgency of defaecation and continence, and the results of laboratory investigations, comprising anal manometry, capacity and compliance of the pouch, completeness of emptying, faecal bacteriology and mucosal inflammation. Frequency of defaecation was found to be inversely correlated with both the capacity (rs = -0.66, P less than 0.01) and the compliance (rs = -0.53, P less than 0.05) of the pouch. Patients who could postpone defaecation for greater than 30 min had higher anal squeeze pressures (P less than 0.05) than patients who had greater urgency of defaecation. Patients with perfect anal continence had higher resting anal pressure (P less than 0.05) and emptied the pouch more completely (P less than 0.01) than patients who experienced minor leakage. The faecal flora of the pouches showed a greater predominance of anaerobes (P less than 0.01) and increased numbers of bacteroides (P less than 0.01) compared with the faecal flora of ileostomies, but the changes in the flora did not correlate with any aspect of bowel function. The best clinical results (i.e. perfect continence, low frequency of defaecation and little urgency) were associated with high anal pressure and with large volume, high compliance and complete emptying of the pouch. The completeness of emptying was similar for both designs of pouch, but the capacity and compliance of triplicated pouches were greater than the capacity and compliance of duplicated J pouches (P less than 0.05), and this was associated with a better clinical result in the triplicated pouches.     

A Unique Variant of Afferent Limb Syndrome After Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND: Afferent limb syndrome is a relatively rare cause of small bowel obstruction after restorative total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. DISCUSSION: This report describes three patients who developed recurrent small bowel obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The bowel obstruction was caused by torsion of the ileum at the inlet of the ileal J-pouch, which was thought to be a variant of afferent limb syndrome. This variant of afferent limb syndrome is characterized by a flexible afferent limb of the pelvic pouch due to the lack adhesion of the ileum in the abdominal cavity. Preoperative diagnosis required multiple series of contrast small bowel enemas. Strictureplasty and ileopexy effectively resolved the recurrent bowel obstruction caused by this variant of afferent limb syndrome.     

Anatomic and functional characteristics of the rat ileal pouch

BACKGROUND: The definitive operation for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis is total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Mild inflammation (pouchitis) is omnipresent in pouches and becomes severe in 50% of UC patients with IPAA. The etiology of pouchitis is likely due to combined genetic, microbial, and immunologic factors. Epithelial cell exposure to surgical trauma and/or to changes in intestinal bacterial composition may account for the inflammatory infiltrate. Progress in understanding pouchitis is restricted by the lack of suitable animal models. METHODS: An ileal pouch-rectal anastomosis [IPRA] in rats was developed to reproduce a model of human IPAA and clinical, gross and histologic criteria were determined. RESULTS: Many shared features with human ileal pouch were observed. CONCLUSION: IPRA is an important in vivo model to study mechanisms of repair, defense and immunity that may contribute to pouchitis.     

Causes and outcomes of pouch excision after restorative proctocolectomy

BACKGROUND: Pouch failure occurs in up to 10 per cent of patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aims of this study were to determine the reasons for pouch excision and to evaluate the outcome of the perineal wound after pouch excision. METHODS: Between 1984 and 2002, 91 patients with severe ileal pouch dysfunction were treated. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from 24 patients who underwent pouch excision. RESULTS: Patients were grouped according to the final histological diagnosis. Fourteen patients with Crohn's disease developed extensive fistulous disease and/or recurrent abscesses, of whom six had a persistent perineal sinus after pouch excision. Five patients had familial adenomatous polyposis, in three of whom desmoid tumours were the cause of failure. Three patients had chronic ulcerative colitis and developed recurrent pelvic sepsis. Finally, two patients with multiple colorectal adenocarcinoma developed recurrent cancer (one) or sepsis (one). CONCLUSION: Sepsis was the principal reason for pouch excision and was usually associated with recrudescent Crohn's disease in the pouch. Perineal wound healing was problematic after pouch excision for Crohn's disease.     

Manovolumetric and sensory characteristics of the ileoanal J pouch compared with healthy rectum

Pouch volume, motility, sensory function and integrated pouch-anal mechanisms during graded isobaric distension of the pouch were prospectively studied in 67 patients with a J pouch-anal anastomosis. The findings were related to functional outcome. Thirty-six normal controls were studied for comparison. In contrast with normal rectum, the ileal pouch exhibited pronounced motility, and pouch contractions were frequent even at a high distension pressure. The presence of high pressure motility was associated with a poor functional outcome. The threshold pressure and threshold volume for eliciting first sensation of filling and urge to defaecate were significantly higher in the ileal pouch. The pressure threshold levels were not related to the functional outcome. Sphincter inhibition on pouch distension reappeared in 25 per cent of the patients. The distension pressure required to elicit the inhibition was considerably higher than in the control subjects. The functional result was similar irrespective of whether sphincter inhibition was present or not. The motor and sensory function of this artificial setting appear to be controlled by nervous mechanisms that are different from those in the healthy anorectum.     

Filling Sensations after Restorative Proctocolectomy

Objective : in order to improve insights in rectal filling sensation, we studied pouch filling sensations after ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) before and after re-establishment of bowel continuity.

Methods : anal manometry and a pouch filling sensation test were performed before as well as 1 and 6 weeks after closure of the loop ileostomy in 17 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy with stapled (8 patients) or manual pouch-anal anastomosis (9 patients). The results were compared with those of 12 control subjects. Results : before ileostomy closure, pouch pressure necessary for inducing the respective sensation thresholds was higher than in controls; the difference was significant for constant and urge sensation. The volumes for urge and maximum tolerable sensation level were significantly lower, with reduced pouch compliance. After stoma closure, pressure and volume thresholds at all sensation levels became completely comparable with control data. No relevant differences were observed between stapled and manual ileal pouch-anal anastomoses.

Conclusions : all levels of filling sensation levels are preserved after restorative proctocolectomy and their parameters are comparable with those of normal rectal filling sensation. Diversion of an ileal J pouch results in resetting of filling sensation thresholds towards lower volume and higher pressure values, but all sensation thresholds normalize within 6 weeks after stoma closure. These data document that neither the rectum, nor the mucosa of the anorectal junction and upper part of the anal canal are involved in filling and urge sensation.     

Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Fourteen patients with ulcerative colitis underwent formation of an S ileal pouch and construction of a stapled pouch-anal anastomosis by a modified technique, which eliminated the use of purse-string sutures. Eleven have had their covering ileostomies closed. Anal manometry performed before and a median of 9 months after ileostomy closure showed significant impairment of internal anal sphincter function. Night evacuation was significantly reduced in the stapled group compared with a similar group of patients who had undergone S ileal pouch formation, mucosal proctectomy and manual transanal anastomosis, but this was the only parameter of function to show a difference. A stapled pouch-anal anastomosis may be superior to the conventional procedure but it still may lead to internal anal sphincter damage which cannot be due to mucosectomy or prolonged anal retraction.     

Classification,differential diagnosis,and diagnosis of pouchitis

Evaluation of patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after total proctocolectomy who present with symptoms suggestive of pouchitis requires a systematic approach. Although idiopathic pouchitis is the most common cause of symptoms, evaluation for possible secondary causes of pouch inflammation and for potential disease mimickers is essential. After appropriate testing and assessement of response to treatment, disease can be classified based on response to antibiotics and as idiopathic or secondary. A systematic approach and the use of different modalities of testing including pouch endoscopy, pathology and imaging, should lead to an appropriate diagnosis and a well-planned treatment plan. A proposed algorithm for evaluation of symptomatic patients will be outlined.