Epstein‐Barr virus‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma association is not only restricted to elderly patients

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common group of malignant lymphomas, account for 30% of adult non‐Hodgkin lymphomas. The 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification included a new entity, Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)+ DLBCL of the elderly, affecting patients aged 50 years or older. However, some reports of younger EBV+ DLBCL cases, without evidence of underlying immunosuppression, can be found. The role of EBV in tumor microenvironment composition in DLBCL is still not well understood. Our aim was to assess EBV presence and latency pattern as well as tumor T‐cell population in an adult DLBCL series of Argentina. The study was conducted on biopsies from 75 DLBCL patients. EBERs expression was performed by in situ hybridization, while EBV gene expression was analyzed using real‐time polymerase chain reaction. LMP1, LMP2A, EBNA2, EBNA3A, CD4, CD8 and Foxp3 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Nine percent of cases showed EBV expression, with similar frequency among patients younger than 50 years and 50 years or older (13% and 8%, respectively). T‐cell subsets were not altered by EBV presence. Latency type II was the most frequently observed, together with lytic gene expression in EBV+ DLBCL, with ≥20% of EBERs+ cells. These findings suggest that EBV+ DLBCL in our series was similar to the previously described in Asia and Latin‐America, displaying latency II or III expression profile and no age‐specific characteristics. Finally, EBV+ DLBCL may be an entity that is not only restricted to patients who are older than 50 years of age, in consequence the age cutoff revision may be a current goal.     

Clinical outcome of Epstein–Barr virus‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma of the elderly in the rituximab era

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of malignant lymphoma. The incidence of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)‐positive DLBCL in Asian and Latin American countries ranges from 8 to 10%. The prognosis of patients with EBV‐positive DLBCL is controversial. To compare the clinical outcome of EBV‐positive and EBV‐negative patients with DLBCL in the rituximab era, we analyzed 239 patients with de novo DLBCL diagnosed between January 2007 and December 2011. The presence of EBV in lymphoma cells was detected using EBV‐encoded RNA in situ hybridization, and it was found that 18 (6.9%) of 260 patients with diagnosed DLBCL tested positive. Among the 260 cases, 216 cases were treated with rituximab plus chemotherapy, as were 8 EBV‐positive DLBCL patients. The median overall survival and progression‐free survival times in patients with EBV‐positive DLBCL were 8.7 months and 6.8 months, respectively. The median overall survival and progression‐free survival could not be determined in EBV‐negative DLBCL patients (P = 0.0002, P < 0.0001, respectively). The outcome of patients with EBV‐positive DLBCL remains poor, even in the rituximab era.     

Frequent downregulation of BTB and CNC homology 2 expression in Epstein–Barr virus‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B‐cell lymphoma subtype, and the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)‐positive subtype of DLBCL is known to show a more aggressive clinical behavior than the EBV‐negative one. BTB and CNC homology 2 (BACH2) has been highlighted as a tumor suppressor in hematopoietic malignancies; however, the role of BACH2 in EBV‐positive DLBCL is unclear. In the present study, BACH2 expression and its significance were studied in 23 EBV‐positive and 43 EBV‐negative patient samples. Immunohistochemistry revealed BACH2 downregulation in EBV‐positive cases (P < 0.0001), although biallelic deletion of BACH2 was not detected by FISH. Next, we analyzed the contribution of BACH2 negativity to aggressiveness in EBV‐positive B‐cell lymphomas using FL‐18 (EBV‐negative) and FL‐18‐EB cells (FL‐18 sister cell line, EBV‐positive). In BACH2‐transfected FL‐18‐EB cells, downregulation of phosphorylated transforming growth factor‐β‐activated kinase 1 (pTAK1) and suppression in p65 nuclear fractions were observed by Western blot analysis contrary to non‐transfected FL‐18‐EB cells. In patient samples, pTAK1 expression and significant nuclear p65, p50, and p52 localization were detected immunohistochemically in BACH2‐negative DLBCL (P < 0.0001, P = 0.006, and P = 0.001, respectively), suggesting that BACH2 downregulation contributes to constitutive activation of the nuclear factor‐κB pathway through TAK1 phosphorylation in BACH2‐negative DLBCL (most EBV‐positive cases). Although further molecular and pathological studies are warranted to clarify the detailed mechanisms, downregulation of BACH2 may contribute to constitutive activation of the nuclear factor‐κB pathway through TAK1 activation.     

Prognostic significance of Epstein–Barr virus DNA detection in pretreatment serum in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

It is still a matter of debate whether detection of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA in pretreatment serum has clinical implications for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. For this study, we measured EBV DNA load in pretreatment serum from 127 diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients without any underlying immunodeficiency to evaluate its effects on clinical manifestations and prognosis. Anthracycline‐based chemotherapy in combination with rituximab was given as initial therapy for 119 patients (94%). Epstein–Barr virus DNA was detected in 15 patients (12%), who were older (P = 0.005) and tended to be at a more advanced disease stage (P = 0.053). They showed significantly worse progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than other patients (P < 0.001 each). This effect remained significant (P = 0.004 and P = 0.027, respectively) after adjustment for age, lactate dehydrogenase, performance status, stage, and extranodal sites. The status of EBV‐encoded small RNA in situ hybridization was known for 123 patients; 6 of 8 positive patients (75%) and 9 of 115 negative patients (8%) had detectable EBV DNA in pretreatment serum. While patients positive for EBV‐encoded small RNA had significantly worse PFS and OS than negative patients (P = 0.001 and P = 0.029, respectively), EBV DNA detection in pretreatment serum was associated with poorer PFS and OS even for the 115 patients negative for EBV‐encoded small RNA (P < 0.001 each). These findings suggest that EBV DNA detection in pretreatment serum may have an adverse prognostic impact for patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma.     

Refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma after first‐line immuno‐CT: Treatment options and outcomes

In the rituximab era, one‐third of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients experience relapse/refractory disease after first‐line anthracycline‐based immunochemotherapy. Optimal management remains an unmet medical need. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of a cohort of refractory patients according to their patterns of refractoriness and the type of salvage option. We performed a retrospective analysis, which included 104 diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated at Lyon Sud University Hospital (2002‐2017) who presented with refractory disease. Refractoriness was defined as progressive/stable disease during first‐line treatment (primary refractory, N = 47), a partial response after the end of first‐line treatment that required subsequent treatment (residual disease, N = 19), or relapse within 1 year of diagnosis after an initial complete response (CR) (early relapse, N = 38). The 2‐year overall survival (OS) rates for primary refractory, early relapse, and residual disease patients were 27%, 25%, and 52%, respectively, while the event‐free survival rates for those groups were 13%, 13%, and 42%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, lactate dehydrogenase level, Ann Arbor stage, poor performance status, high age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index score, and age > 65 years were associated with shorter OS. The use of rituximab and platinum‐based chemo during the first salvage treatment was associated with prolonged OS. In a multivariate analysis, age (HR:2.06) and rituximab use (HR:0.54) were associated with OS. Among patients <65 years who achieved a CR, autologous stem‐cell transplant was associated with higher 2‐year OS (90% vs 74%, P = 0.10). Patients who were treated with a targeted therapy in the context of a clinical trial after second‐line treatment had a higher 2‐year OS (34% vs 19%, P = 0.06). In conclusion, patients with primary refractory disease or early relapse have very poor outcomes but may benefit from rituximab retreatment during the first salvage treatment.     

The prognostic significance of EBV DNA load and EBER status in diagnostic specimens from diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)‐encoded small RNA in situ hybridization (EBER‐ISH) is a widely accepted method to evaluate EBV involvement in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), although little is known regarding associations between EBV DNA load and the EBER status and whether EBV DNA load data provide additional clinical information. In this study, we quantified EBV DNA load in diagnostic specimens from DLBCL patients diagnosed at our hospital to evaluate clinical implications of EBV DNA load in diagnostic specimens as contrasted with EBER‐ISH. Among 140 DLBCL patients without underlying immunodeficiency, 51 were evaluable for both EBER and EBV DNA load, 83 for EBER only and one for EBV DNA load only. The median EBV DNA load was 708 copies/µg. Although EBV DNA load was significantly higher for EBER‐positive patients than for EBER‐negative patients (p < 0.001), EBV DNA was detected in up to 72% of EBER‐negative patients. Progression‐free survival and overall survival were significantly worse for patients with EBV DNA load above 700 copies/µg than for those with EBV DNA load below 700 copies/µg (p = 0.009 and p = 0.003); they were also significantly worse for EBER‐positive patients than for EBER‐negative patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). Even among EBER‐negative patients, higher EBV DNA load conferred worse progression‐free survival and overall survival (p = 0.041 and p = 0.013). These findings indicate that EBV DNA load in diagnostic specimens is not a simple surrogate for the EBER status and may be a potential biomarker associated with EBV involvement and prognosis in DLBCL. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Epstein–Barr virus presence in pediatric diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma reveals a particular association and latency patterns: Analysis of viral role in tumor microenvironment

Non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma represents 6–10% of pediatric malignancies, and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the three major subtypes. The 2008 WHO classification included a new entity, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)‐positive DLBCL of the elderly, affecting patients >50 years. It has been demonstrated that EBV may play a role in tumor microenvironment composition, disturbing antitumor immune response and disease progression. As most studies were performed in adults, our aim was to assess EBV presence and latency pattern, as well as T‐cell microenvironment in a pediatric DLBCL series of Argentina. The study was conducted on formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded biopsies from 25 DLBCL patients. EBV‐encoded small nuclear early regions (EBERs) expression was performed by in situ hybridization, whereas EBV gene expression was analyzed using real‐time PCR. Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane proteins (LMP)1, LMP2A, CD3, CD4, CD8 and Foxp3 expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Forty percent of cases showed EBV expression, with a significantly higher incidence among patients <10 years (p = 0.018), and with immunosuppressed (p = 0.023). T‐cell subsets were not altered by EBV presence. Full EBV latency antigen expression (latency type III) was the most frequently pattern observed, together with BZLF1 lytic gene expression. One patient showed II‐like pattern (LMP1 without LMP2A expression). Based exclusively on IHC, some patients showed latency II/III (EBERs and LMP1 expression) or I (EBERs only). These findings suggest that EBV association in our series was higher than the previously demonstrated for elderly DLBCL and that EBV latency pattern could be more complex from those previously observed. Therefore, EBV could be an important cofactor in pediatric DLBCL lymphomagenesis.     

Antiviral therapy improves overall survival in hepatitis C virus‐infected patients who develop diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with increased incidence of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Several studies have demonstrated regression of indolent lymphoma with antiviral therapy (AVT) alone. However, the role of AVT in HCV‐infected patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is unclear. We therefore analyzed AVT's impact on oncologic outcomes of HCV‐infected patients (cases) who developed DLBCL. Cases seen at our institution (June 2004–May 2014) were matched with uninfected counterparts (controls) and then divided according to prior AVT consisting of interferon‐based regimens. We studied 304 patients (76 cases and 228 controls). More cases than controls had extranodal (79% vs. 72%; p = 0.07) and upper gastrointestinal (GI; 42% vs. 24%; p = 0.004) involvement. Cases never given AVT had DLBCL more refractory to first‐line chemotherapy than that in the controls (33% vs. 17%; p = 0.05) and exhibited a trend toward more progressive lymphoma at last examination compared to controls (50% vs. 32%; p = 0.09) or cases given AVT (50% vs. 27%; p = 0.06). Cases never given AVT had worse 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates than did the controls (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.01–5.3]; p = 0.04). Furthermore, AVT improved 5‐year OS rates among cases in both univariate (median [Interquartile range]: 39 [26–56] vs. 16 [6–41] months, p = 0.02) and multivariate analyses (HR = 0.21 [95% CI, 0.06–0.69]; p = 0.01). This study highlights the negative impact of chronic HCV on survival of DLBCL patients and shows that treatment of HCV infection is associated with a better cancer response to chemotherapy and improves 5‐year OS.     

Epstein-barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: what we know so far

Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV-positive) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the elderly is a newly described lymphoproliferative disorder recently included as a "provisional" entity in the most current WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. The objective of this review is to provide a thorough and current summary of the existing knowledge of this subtype of DLBCL. We will review and discuss the incidence of EBV expression in DLBCL, the pathogenesis behind EBV-driven malignant transformation of B cells, the different EBV latency patterns associated with DLBCL, the distinct pathologic characteristics of EBV-positive DLBCL, the potential predictive and prognostic value of EBV tumoral status in patients with DLBCL, and potential strategies for the treatment of this rare entity, which is characterized by a suboptimal response to therapy and poor survival rate.     

Multicentre phase II study of CyclOBEAP plus rituximab in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

The R‐CHOP regimen has been found to improve the outcome of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, it does not provide a satisfactory treatment outcome in the high‐risk group. We previously administered the CyclOBEAP regimen to patients with DLBCL, and reported its safety and efficacy. The R‐CyclOBEAP regimen was administered over a total period of 12 weeks, and rituximab 375 mg/m² was given every 2 weeks. There were 101 eligible patients. CR was achieved in 96 patients (95%). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 85% and progression‐free survival (PFS) rate was 76%. When the patients were divided according to the IPI, the 5‐year OS and PFS rates did not significantly differ among the risk groups. The 5‐year PFS of the germinal centre B‐cell group was 80% and that of the non‐GCB group was 74% (NS). Univariate analysis showed that the presence of B symptoms, extranodal lesions ≧2, and sIL‐2R were significant poor prognostic factors. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 91 patients and thrombocytopenia in 9 patients. The addition of rituximab to CyclOBEAP therapy may enhance the effect of CyclOBEAP therapy for DLBCL. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Burkitt lymphoma versus diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a practical approach

Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) is listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphoid tumours as an “aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma”, characterized by a high degree of proliferation of the malignant cells and deregulation of the c‐MYC gene. The main diagnostic challenge in BL is to distinguish it from diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While in children BL and DLBCL types probably do not differ clinically, and the differential diagnosis between BL and DLBCL may theoretically appear clear‐cut, in adults daily practice shows the existence of cases that have morphological features, immunophenotypic and cytogenetics intermediate between DLBCL and BL, and cannot be classified with certainty in these categories. Distinguishing between BL and DLBCL is critical, as the two diseases require different management. This review summarizes the current practical approach, including the use of a large panel of antibodies, and cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic techniques, to distinguish between BL, DLBCL and the provisional category of “B‐cell lymphoma, unclassificable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma”, now listed in the updated WHO classification. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

CD5 expression correlates with inferior survival and enhances the negative effect of p53 overexpression in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

De novo CD5‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (CD5+ DLBCL) is increasingly recognized as a distinct pathologic phenomenon with a specific clinical picture. However, CD5+ DLBCL has not been studied on a large scale in China. In this study, we show that CD5+ DLBCL occurs at a low frequency (9.2%). Comparison of clinical characteristics of CD5+ vs CD5? DLBCL showed that CD5+ DLBCL was more frequently elderly (>60 years) and had B symptoms, high‐performance status, stage III‐IV, an IPI score >2 and bone marrow involvement. Patients with CD5+ DLBCL had tumours with a higher prevalence of BCL‐2 and p53 overexpression than CD5? DLBCL. Patients with CD5+ DLBCL had inferior progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than did patients with CD5? DLBCL. For CD5+ DLBCL, the patients who were treated with rituximab showed significantly better PFS and OS than those treated without rituximab. However, patients treated with RCHOP showed similar PFS and OS when compared with the group treated with intensive therapy. In addition, patients with p53 and CD5 co‐expression had the worst PFS and OS. In conclusion, CD5+ DLBCL was associated with unfavorable clinicopathologic variables and with inferior survival. CD5+ DLBCL has a high frequency of p53 overexpression, and CD5 augments the negative effect of p53 overexpression in DLBCL.     

Burkitt lymphoma versus diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a practical approach

Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) is listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphoid tumours as an ‘aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma’, characterized by a high degree of proliferation of the malignant cells and deregulation of the c‐MYC gene. The main diagnostic challenge in BL is to distinguish it from diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While in children BL and DLBCL types probably do not differ clinically, and the differential diagnosis between BL and DLBCL may theoretically appear clear‐cut, in adults daily practice shows the existence of cases that have morphological features, immunophenotypic and cytogenetics intermediate between DLBCL and BL, and cannot be classified with certainty in these categories. Distinguishing between BL and DLBCL is critical, as the two diseases require different management. This review summarizes the current practical approach, including the use of a large panel of antibodies, and cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic techniques, to distinguish between BL, DLBCL and the provisional category of ‘B‐cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma’, now listed in the updated WHO classification. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of transformed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in hepatitis C virus‐infected patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes a chronic but curable infection associated with the development of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Preliminary data have shown frequent transformation of indolent lymphoma to DLBCL in HCV‐infected patients. To compare their clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes, we reviewed the medical records and pathology reports of HCV‐infected and uninfected patients with DLBCL that transformed from indolent lymphoma seen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (June 2004 to May 2015). To identify predictors of DLBCL relapse, patients with relapse after first‐line chemotherapy were compared with those without it using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Compared with the uninfected patients (n = 63), HCV‐infected patients (n = 21) were younger (median age =54 years [interquartile range= 49–62 years] vs. 62 years [53–66 years]; p = 0.01) and more often had advanced DLBCL (Ann Arbor stage 3–4; 95% vs. 76%; p = 0.05). Immunophenotypically, more HCV‐infected than uninfected patients had CD10‐negative B cells (76% vs. 43%; p = 0.008), CD5‐positive B cells (39% vs. 7%; p = 0.004) and activated B‐cell phenotypes (57% vs. 31%; p = 0.07). Comparison of the patients who had relapse after first‐line chemotherapy (n = 42) and those who did not (n = 40) revealed that having CD5‐positive B cells was the only factor associated with DLBCL relapse in multivariate analysis (odds ratio= 10.7; p = 0.02). HCV‐infected patients with transformed DLBCL have unique clinicopathologic characteristics that make their lymphoma difficult to treat, potentially leading to unfavorable outcome. The impact of HCV eradication should be explored in such patients.     

Primary diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma of the tonsil

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment outcome of Indian patients with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the tonsil treated at a single institution. METHODS: In all, 121 patients with DLBCL of the tonsil, treated at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, from January 1990 to December 2002, were included. The median age was 45 years and the majority of patients (68%) were males. Systemic symptoms were present in 12% of patients; 28% presented with stage I and 67% had stage II disease. Treatment consisted of a combination of chemotherapy (CTh) and radiotherapy (RT) for the majority of patients (69.4%). Among those receiving RT, 64% received an RT dose of > or =45 Gy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 62 months, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66.4% and 81.6%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors included: WHO performance score > or =2 (OS: 72.1% vs 95.6%, P = .016), bulky tumors (OS: 68.5% vs 86.9%, P = .001), presence of B-symptoms (OS: 36.7% vs 79.6%, P < .001), and Ann Arbor stage. On multivariate analysis; WHO performance score > or =2 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-15.12), and B symptoms (HR, 6.27; 95% CI, 2.38-16.48), retained statistical significance. CTh + RT resulted in a significantly better outcome than those treated with CTh alone (OS: 85.7% vs 70.7%, P = .008). The complete response (P = .053), DFS (P = .039), and OS (P = .014) rates were significantly better for patients receiving an RT dose > or =45 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor bulk, WHO performance score, the presence of B symptoms, and Ann Arbor stage significantly influence outcome. A combined modality treatment, consisting of CTh and RT (with an RT dose of > or =45 Gy), results in a satisfactory outcome in patients with this uncommon neoplasm.