Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures

BackgroundExtensive femoral bone loss poses a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Many techniques have been developed to address this problem including fully porous cylindrical stems, impaction bone grafting, and cementation of long stems, which have had varied success. Modular tapered fluted femoral stems (MTFS) show favorable results. We sought to determine the minimum 2-year radiographic and clinical performance of MTFS in rTHA in a population with extensive proximal femoral bone loss.MethodsOur clinical database was queried retrospectively for all patients who underwent rTHA with an MTFS. We included patients with Paprosky 3 and 4 femoral bone loss and patients with Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures. Patients without 2-year follow-up were invited to return to clinic for X-ray evaluation and to complete clinical questionnaires. We assessed distance of stem subsidence and presence of stem fixation on final X-ray. We recorded all-cause revision and survival of the stem at final follow-up.ResultsOne hundred twenty-nine patients were available for follow-up. Average follow-up time was 3.75 years. One hundred twenty-two stems (95%) remained in place at final follow-up. Median subsidence was 1.4 mm (range 0-21). All-cause revision rate was 16.3% (21 patients). Of the hips revised, 10 were for instability, 6 for infection, 1 for aseptic loosening, and 1 for periprosthetic femur fracture. Three were revised for other reasons. The stem was revised in 7 patients (5.4%), and the most common reason for stem revision was infection (5 patients). The other 2 stems were revised for aseptic loosening in a Paprosky 4 femur and periprosthetic femur fracture. Survival of tapered modular fluted stems with aseptic failure as an endpoint was 98.4%. The mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement score at final follow-up was 73, and mean Veterans Rand 12 item health survey physical and mental scores were 32.8 and 52.2, respectively.ConclusionIn patients with Paprosky 3, 4 femoral defects or Vancouver type B2, B3 fractures, modular tapered fluted stems for femoral revision show excellent outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up.     

Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundIn the revisions for Paprosky type II femoral defects, diaphyseal fixating femoral stems are commonly used. To preserve bone stock, the use of a shorter primary conical stem could be an adequate alternative. The objective of this study is to compare the results of a primary conical stem to the more commonly used diaphyseal fixating modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty surgery with Paprosky type II femoral defects.MethodsA total of 59 consecutive patients with Paprosky type II femoral defects from our prospective revision registry were included. Thirty patients who received a long distal fixating modular stem (Revision Stem, Lima Corporate) and 29 patients who received a primary conical short stem (Wagner Cone, Zimmer) were prospectively followed. Minimal follow-up time was 2 years for subsidence and patient-reported outcome measures and 5 years for complications, reoperation, and revision. We compared subsidence, perioperative complications, reoperations, femoral component survival, Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 Dimension, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, and VAS for pain during activity between stems.ResultsBoth groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and surgery-related characteristics. We found more perioperative complications and stem revisions with the modular revision stem than with the primary conical stem. There were no statistical differences in subsidence, EuroQol 5 Dimension, Oxford Hip Score, and VAS for pain at rest or during activity between both stems.ConclusionIn revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type II femoral defects, uncemented primary monobloc conical femoral stems showed the same clinical result as distal fixating modular stems with fewer complications and fewer stem revisions.     

Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study

We used 79 Wagner SL stems (Sulzer Orthopedics, Baar, Switzerland) in femoral revisions with a minimum 5-year follow-up. There were 11 dislocations. A limb length discrepancy and limp were frequent. One loosened stem was rerevised. The cumulative probability of not having a stem revision for any reason was 92.3% in the best case scenario. Stem subsidence was associated with poor femoral canal filling. Definite proximal new bone regeneration (50 hips) was associated with an absence of major bone defects (P = .01). Lateral and medial femoral cortex and the outside femoral diameter had increased at the end of follow-up (P < .001). Wagner SL femoral revision stems can solve difficult cases with major proximal bone defects or periprosthetic fractures. Radiographic bone fixation and bone regeneration were frequent. Dislocations and stem subsidence were also frequent.     

Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence

BackgroundBoth modular and monoblock tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems have gained popularity over fully porous-coated cylindrical (FPCC) femoral stem designs, but limited data exist comparing subsidence rates following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine differences in subsidence and clinical outcomes among 3 revision femoral stem designs.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 335 patients who underwent femoral component revision to a cementless modular TFT (n = 225), monoblock TFT (n = 63), or FPCC (n = 47) stem between 2012 and 2019. We evaluated radiographic subsidence rates, re-revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes between the 3 stems. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of stem type on the risk of subsidence >5 mm.ResultsAt an average follow-up of 39 months (range, 12 to 96 months), there were no differences in mean subsidence rates (3.5 vs 2.4 vs 2.1 mm, P = .14), HOOS Jr scores (78 vs 74 vs 64 points, P = .15), or aseptic re-revision rates (4% vs 3% vs 0%, P = .29) between modular TFT, monoblock TFT, and FPCC stems. Although modular TFT stems were more often used in patients with extensive femoral bone loss (Paprosky III and IV), there were no differences in subsidence rates >5 mm among the 3 stems (P > .05) in multivariate analysis.ConclusionModular TFT, monoblock TFT, and FPCC femoral stem designs all perform well in revision THA with no difference in clinical outcomes or subsidence rates. Surgeons should select the stem which they feel is the most clinically appropriate.     

Subsidence of monoblock and modular titanium fluted tapered stems in revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective multicentre comparison study

BackgroundTapered, fluted, titanium (TFT) stems have shown good clinical outcomes in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), however concerns exist regarding early subsidence. This study compares subsidence between a modern monoblock 3-degree and a modular 2-degree TFT stem in rTHA.MethodsA retrospective, international multicentre comparative study was conducted including 64 rTHA in 63 patients. A monoblock TFT stem was used in 37 cases and a modular TFT stem was used in 27 cases. Patient demographics, Paprosky femoral bone loss classification, bicortical contact and stem subsidence were recorded at minimum four week follow up.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in overall subsidence (p = 0.318) or the rate of subsidence >10 mm between stems. Mean subsidence was 2.13 mm in the monoblock group and 3.15 mm in the modular group. Two stems subsided >10 mm: one in each group. There was no difference in bicortical contact between groups (p = 0.98). No re-revisions were performed.ConclusionsWe found no difference in subsidence between the two stems. Surgeons may consider the use of monoblock stems in rTHA as they have comparably low rates of subsidence and eliminate the small but potentially catastrophic risk of implant fracture at modular junctions associated with modular stems.     

Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundWe describe the intraoperative parameters that affect stem subsidence rates in tapered modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We also determine the effect of the stem bicortical contact on subsidence rates and whether there is a minimum threshold bicortical contact that must be achieved to avoid the complication of subsidence.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 109 hips in 105 patients (53 males and 52 females) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. All revisions were carried out for Paprosky type 3A and 3B femoral deficits. Clinical outcomes included the indication for revision, aseptic re-revision surgery, specifications of the stem inserted, and specifications of the femoral head and acetabular components implanted. Radiographic outcome measures included subsidence (mm) and bicortical contact (mm).ResultsUsing multivariate regression analysis, 3 parameters were associated with an increased rate of stem subsidence. A reduced bicortical contact distance (P < .001) and a stem length of ≤155 mm (P < .001) were both associated with higher subsidence rates. We also demonstrated a novel threshold of 20-mm bicortical contact which must be achieved to significantly reduce subsidence rates in these modular femoral stems for revision THA.ConclusionSubsidence rates of modular tapered femoral stems for revision THA can be significantly reduced by increasing the initial bicortical contact of the stem within the diaphysis and the overall length of the femoral stem >155 mm. We describe a minimum threshold bicortical contact distance of 20 mm that should ideally be exceeded to significantly reduce the risk of stem subsidence within the femoral canal.     

A Role for Modern Primary Cementless Femoral Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundIn revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases with preserved femoral metaphyseal bone, tapered proximally porous-coated “primary” femoral stems may be an option. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with Paprosky I or II femoral bone loss undergoing revision THA with either a primary metaphyseal-engaging cementless stem or a revision diaphyseal-engaging stem.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 70 patients with Paprosky I or II femoral bone loss who underwent femoral revision. 35 patients who were revised using a primary cementless femoral stem were compared with 35 patients who underwent femoral revision using a revision diaphyseal-engaging stem. The groups were similar regarding age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications were compared over an average follow-up of 2.9 years (SD 1.4).ResultsRevision THA was most commonly performed for periprosthetic joint infection (N = 27, 38.6%). The groups were similar with regards to Paprosky femoral classification (P = .56), length of stay (P = .68), discharge disposition (P = .461), operative time (P = .20), and complications (P = .164). There were no significant differences between primary and revision femoral stem subsidence (0.12 vs. 0.75 mm, P = .18), leg length discrepancy (2.3 vs. 4.05 mm, P = .37), and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr (73.1 [SD 21.1] vs. 62.8 [SD 21.7], P = .088). No patient underwent additional revision surgery involving the femoral component.ConclusionUse of modern primary cementless femoral stems is a viable option for revision hip arthroplasty in the setting of preserved proximal femoral metaphyseal bone. Outcomes are not inferior to those of revision stems and offer potential benefits.     

Long-Term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered and Fluted Modular Stem: A Mean Follow-Up of 16 Years

BackgroundTapered modular stems are increasingly used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with deficient femoral bone stock. This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes of revision THA using a tapered and fluted modular stem.MethodsBetween December 1998 and February 2006, 113 revision THAs (110 patients) were performed with a tapered and fluted modular stem at a single institution. Hip radiographs were used to identify stem subsidence, stability, and femoral radiolucency. Final outcomes were assessed in 72 hips (70 patients), with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 16 years (range, 10-23). At the final evaluation, the Harris Hip Score improved from a mean of 41 points (range, 10-72) preoperatively to 83 points (range, 56-100) (P < .001). Six femoral re-revisions were performed for the following reasons: 1 aseptic loosening, 2 stem fractures, and 3 infections. One stem fracture occurred at the modular junction after 14 years, and the other at a more distal location after 15 years. Stem subsidence was >5 mm in 6 hips (9.1%), but secondary stability was achieved in all stems. Osseointegration was observed in 63 (95.5%) hips. Stem survivorship was 91.1% with an end point of any re-revision and 94.6% for aseptic re-revision.ConclusionA tapered and fluted modular stem demonstrated excellent implant survivorship with reliable bony fixation at a mean follow-up of 16 years. This type of stem can be a durable option for revision THA in patients who have femoral defects.     

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa,IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects

BackgroundModern fluted titanium-tapered stems (FTTS) have been increasingly utilized to achieve primary stability in conversion and revision total hip arthroplasty with major femoral bone loss. This study sought to determine the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a monoblock FTTS in patients who had major femoral bone loss.MethodsA multicenter retrospective observational study of all total hip arthroplasty patients who received a monoblock FTTS who had up to 5-year radiographic follow-up was conducted. Only patients with femoral Paprosky classifications of IIIa, IIIb, and IV were included. Eighty-one monoblock FTTS were examined. Median clinical follow-up was 29 months (range, 18 to 58). Stem subsidence and loosening were assessed on most recent radiographs. All-cause revisions and stem survivals were assessed.ResultsMedian subsidence was 1.4 millimeters (mm) (range, 0 to 15.0). Sixteen (23.9%) and 3 (4.5%) stems had subsidence greater than 5 and 10 mm, respectively. All stems not acutely revised appeared stable, without evidence of loosening, at latest follow-up. Ten hips (12.3%) required reoperations. Of these, only 5 (6.2%) stems were removed; 4 due to periprosthetic joint infection and 1 for surgical exposure during acetabular revision. Kaplan–Meier analyses yielded an all-cause stem survivorship of 95.1% at 2-years and 87.1% at 4-years. Stem survivorships excluding septic causes was 98.8% at both 2 and 4 years.ConclusionMonoblock FTTS in complex femoral reconstruction cases showed encouraging clinical and radiographic results in patients who had severe femoral bone loss at median 29 months follow-up.     

应用锥形沟槽式股骨组配柄假体行全髋关节翻修术的中期疗效

目的 探讨应用锥形沟槽设计的股骨组配柄假体行全髋关节股骨侧假体翻修术的中期疗效.方法 2000年5月至2005年8月采用锥形沟槽式股骨组配柄假体行全髋关节翻修术19例,男6例,女13例;年龄47～86岁,平均67岁.单髋17例,双髋2例.术前诊断均为股骨柄和臼杯假体无菌性松动合并股骨侧骨缺损,按Paprosky标准诊断为Ⅱ型缺损4髋,Ⅲa型缺损14髋,Ⅲb型缺损3髋.股骨侧翻修均采用锥形沟槽式股骨组配柄假体(Lima-Lto,意大利),髋臼侧均采用SPH臼杯假体(LimaLto,意大利)行生物学固定.关节头臼界面采用陶瓷-陶瓷组合17髋,金属-聚乙烯组合4髋.结果 全部病例随访5～10年,平均7年.Harris髋关节评分由术前平均(46.2±15.2)分改善至翻修术后半年平均(90.3±5.3)分,末次随访平均(92.2±3.5)分.X线片显示翻修柄获广泛骨长入骨性固定者20髋(95%,20/21),纤维性稳定者1髋(5%,1/21).假体下沉0～10 mm,平均2.4 mm.随访期间无一例因假体松动或其他原因需行再次翻修.结论 采用锥形沟槽式股骨组配柄假体行伴有PaproskyⅡ型、Ⅲa和Ⅲb型骨缺损的股骨侧假体翻修术,可获得理想的初始稳定和永久生物学固定,中期随访疗效满意.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the midterm results of the revision total hip replacement with a fluted and tapered modular stem. Methods Nineteen patients (21 hips) underwent revision total hip arthroplasty from May 2000 to August 2005 were reviewed. There were 13 females and 6 males, with an average age of 67 years. Pre-revision diagnosis included aseptic loosening of the cups and stems associated with femoral defects (Paprosky classification) type Ⅱ 4 hips (19%), type Ⅲa 14 hips (67%), and type Ⅲb 3 hips (14%). The adopted acetabular component was SPH (Lima-Lto, Italy), and femoral component was a fluted and tapered modular stem (Lima-Lto, Italy). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed postoperatively. Results The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 5-10). The Harris hip score improved from 46.2±15.2 preoperatively to 90.3±5.3 postoperatively, and maintain 92.2±3.5 at the latest follow-up. The X-ray films showed bone ingrowths fixation in 20 hips (95%) and fibrous stable fixation in 1 hip (5%). The average stem subsidence was 2.4 mm (range, 0-10 mm). There were no re-revisions of the femoral stem for any reason. Conclusion The midterm results of revision total hip replacement with a fluted and tapered modular stem in Paprosky type Ⅱ, Ⅲ a, Ⅲ b femoral defect associated aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was encouraging.     

Results of Wagner SL revision stem with impaction bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty

Background:

As the number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed increases, so do the number of required revisions. Impaction bone grafting with Wagner SL Revision stem is a good option for managing bone deficiencies arising from aseptic osteolysis. We studied the results of cementless diaphyseal fixation in femoral revision after total hip arthroplasty and whether there was spontaneous regeneration of bone stock in the proximal femur after the use of Wagner SL Revision stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) with impaction bone grafting.

Materials and Methods:

We performed 53 hip revisions using impaction bone grafting and Wagner SL Revision stems in 48 patients; (5 cases were bilateral) for variety of indications ranging from aseptic osteolysis to preiprosthetic fractures. The average age was 59 years (range 44-68 years). There were 42 male and 6 female patients. Four patients died after surgery for reasons unrelated to surgery. 44 patients were available for complete analysis.

Results:

The mean Harris Hip Score was 42 before surgery and improved to 86 by the final followup evaluation at a mean point of 5.5 years. Of the 44 patients, 87% (n=39) had excellent results and 10% (n=5) had good results. The stem survival rate was 98% (n=43).

Conclusion:

Short term results for revision THA with impaction bone grafting and Wagner SL revision stems are encouraging. However, it is necessary to obtain long term results through periodic followup evaluation, as rate of complications may increase in future.     

The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery

From a biomechanical view point, cementless fixation of a tapered stem has some advantages compared with other techniques to treat severe proximal femoral bone loss in reconstructive hip surgery. We reviewed 129 consecutive revision arthroplasties of the femoral component in which the tapered Wagner self-locking revision stem was used. The mean followup of patients without rerevision of the stem was 8.1 years (range, 5.1-14.1 years). Six revision stems required rerevision (malpositioning, one stem; subsidence, one stem; periprosthetic fracture, one stem; deep infection, three stems) between 0.13 and 4.6 years postoperatively. Using removal of the stem for any cause as the end point, the cumulative survival at 14.1 years was 95.2%. The average Merle d'Aubigné score improved from 7.7 points preoperatively to 14.4 points at the latest followup. Because of new bone formation, the most recent radiographs showed clear, good, or excellent restoration of the proximal femur in 88% of patients. Considering possible late complications such as osteolysis of the femur, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and late infection, the shortest stem that ensures sufficient mechanical stability should be used. It may be easier to achieve high primary stability in short stems with a tapered design than with other short stem designs.     

Results of uncemented distal locked prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty with proximal femoral bone loss: A retrospective study

Introduction:

Management of bone loss is a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). A retrospective review was performed to study the use of uncemented distal locked prosthesis in cases with proximal femoral bone loss.

Materials and Methods:

Uncemented stems with distal interlocking were used in 65 hips during revision THAs with 38 hips having Paprosky IIIB/IV defects between January 1998 and February 2004. There were 48 males and 17 females in the study with an average age of 53 years (range 30-80 years). Radiographic and clinical outcome evaluation using the Harris hip score (HHS) were performed.

Results:

An improvement in HHS (mean: 33 points) was observed at final followup (mean: 9 years). Regeneration of proximal bone stock was observed without signs of loosening or subsidence and none of the stems were revised. Three patients developed recurrent dislocation while one had a stem subsidence of 1cm following removal of interlocking bolts.

Conclusion:

Uncemented distal locked prosthesis provide adequate stability in revision THA, aiding the reconstruction of bony deficiencies while avoiding the disadvantages of fully porous or cemented implants.     

Wagner Cone Midterm Survivorship and Outcomes

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy requires an individualized treatment approach to prevent complications. Metaphyseal engaging stems in this population risk fracture, size/offset mismatch, and aseptic loosening. The Wagner conical femoral implant is a short diaphyseal engaging femoral stem that could improve treatment success in this difficult patient population.MethodsWe identified 302 consecutive patients undergoing THA using the Wagner cone femoral prosthesis between January 2010 and January 2017. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes were obtained through chart review and radiographic measurements of postoperative X-rays. We used multivariate analysis to determine predictors of poor outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to demonstrate implant survivorship with reoperation and revision as endpoints. The average follow-up was 3.2 years, with a minimum of 2 years.ResultsThe implant retention survival rate during the 3.2-year study period was 98.7%. The overall reoperation rate was 4.2%, with infection followed by fracture being the most common reasons for reoperation. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening, and no patients were revised for subsidence. The average subsidence was 1.1 mm. The Harris Hip Score improved from 48.6 ± 7.3 (range, 28-64) preoperatively to 86.1 ± 8.5 (range, 66-100) at latest follow-up. The patient-reported satisfaction rate was 98.3%.ConclusionThe Wagner cone femoral prosthesis demonstrated excellent clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported functional outcomes at midterm follow-up. We recommend use of the Wagner cone in THA patients with challenging proximal femoral anatomy, small femoral diameter, or poor metaphyseal bone quality.     

Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables

BACKGROUND: The Wagner SL uncemented revision stem has been utilised successfully for revision hip surgery where marked loss of proximal bone stock co-exists or where there is a periprosthetic fracture. Implanted via the transfemoral approach, one significant difficulty appears to be a tendency for implant subsidence, which in some cases has been troublesome enough to necessitate early revision (usually to a larger prosthesis). METHODS: A change in our operative practice allowed us to review the effects of using either wire cerclages or 2.0 mm Dall-Miles cables for prophylactic wiring of the distal femur. Seventeen Wagner SL stems, inserted via the transfemoral approach, were studied in 16 patients. RESULTS: We found those patients prophylactically wired with Dall-Miles cables demonstrated no subsidence in comparison with those in whom heavy wire cerclage had been utilised (mean subsidence 6 mm; p=0.001). In addition, we found that closure of the proximal osteotomy with wires conferred a more reliable rate of union in comparison with those closed with heavy sutures. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of Dall-Miles cables for distal cerclage and osteotomy closure for the Wagner prosthesis.     

Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis

Between 1988 and 1991, 40 Wagner SL femoral revision stems were irnplanted at the Orthopaedic Departments of the University of Basel and of the Kantonsspital Liestal, Switzerland. The indications were: 27 cases of extensive bone resorption and destruction of the proximal prosthetic bed, seven periprosthetic fractures, two Girdlestone situations after removal of infected total hip arthroplastiy (THA), 1 case each of primary arthroplasty for congenital dysplasia of the hip, failed osteosynthesis of a pertrochanteric fracture, subtrochanteric femoral fracture and femoral fracture with subsequent osteomyelitis. The average follow-up time was 47 months. The average age of the patients was 70 years (range 37–85 years). The average preoperative hip score was 32 points, postoperative 78 points. We noted to severe complications such as thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or nerve injury. No case of early infection has occurred to date. Four hips required further revision, one after a haematogenous infection of the prosthesis 2 years after implantation, one 4 weeks after surgery because of a stem which was significantly undersized compared with the medullary canal of the femur. Two hips were revised after 3 and 4 years, respectively, for continuous subsidence and loosening in the medullary canal. Both revisions were successfully achieved using a femoral component of larger diameter. We recommend the Wagner SL femoral revision stem, not as a routine procedure to treat loosening, but for patients with severe femoral bone resorption after THA or periprosthetic fractures, those in the Girdlestone situation and geriatric patients with pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures.