Sequential prolonged oral topotecan and prolonged oral etoposide as second-line therapy in ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical models suggest synergy when topoisomerase I and II inhibitors are given sequentially, but not simultaneously. A phase I study was conducted in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma to determine the tolerability (maximum number of days) of sequential oral topotecan and oral etoposide. METHODS: Topotecan (0.8 mg/m(2)) was administered daily (days 1-5) followed by etoposide (50 mg/m(2)) administered daily for up to 5 days (days 8-12). Patients on dose levels 3 and 4 repeated topotecan for up to 5 days starting on day 15 after the initial topotecan and etoposide sequence. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as: neutrophils <1000/microl or platelets <50,000/microl before completing administration of etoposide or topotecan; neutropenic fever; platelets <20,000/microl; or a delay greater than 2 weeks in starting cycle 2 due to hematologic toxicity (ANC <1500/microl or platelets <100,000/microl on scheduled day of treatment). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered into this trial, and a total of 54 cycles (range 1-10) of therapy were administered. Dose-limiting toxicities, principally neutropenia, occurred when therapy was administered for 3 of 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: Oral topotecan and oral etoposide administered at these doses daily for 5 days sequentially for a maximum of three (out of every four) weeks of therapy are tolerable. In some cases, it may be necessary to hold therapy the third week. Based on the activity seen in this patient population, it is planned to take this regimen into a phase II setting.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

Intraperitoneal interferon-alpha in residual ovarian carcinoma: a phase II gynecologic oncology group study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to confirm the activity of interferon-alpha intraperitoneally in minimal residual epithelial ovarian cancer in a Phase II multi-institutional trial and to investigate the activity of the agent based on prior response to first-line platinum compounds. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with minimal residual (<0.5 cm) epithelial ovarian cancer at reassessment laparotomy were entered into a multicenter trial of intraperitoneal interferon-alpha given for 12 cycles unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred first. Patients were considered favorable if they were platinum sensitive and/or relapsed 6 months or longer after completing treatment and unfavorable if they were platinum insensitive and/or relapsed shorter than 6 months after completing treatment and/or had stable or progressive disease during initial therapy. A third-look laparotomy was performed within 12 weeks of completion of treatment in those patients who were in clinical remission. RESULTS: Eighty patients were clinically evaluable for toxicity only (48 favorable, 32 unfavorable) and 46 of them were evaluable for response, of whom 25 were favorable (platinum sensitive) and 21 unfavorable (platinum resistant). In the favorable group, there was a 28% surgically documented response rate (7/25 patients): 16% (4/25) had complete responses (negative reassessment operation), 12% (3/25) had partial responses, 32% (8/25) were nonresponders, and 40% (10 patients) developed progressive disease before planned reassessment operation. In the unfavorable group, there were no responding patients: 6 were nonresponders at reassessment operation and 15 developed progressive disease before planned reassessment operation. Of the 80 patients evaluable for toxicity, the most common adverse effects that were more than grade 2 were gastrointestinal (12; 15%), fever (8; 10%), neutropenia (7;9%), and leukopenia (6; 8%). Grade 4 toxicity was seen in 5 patients; each had fever and gastrointestinal toxicity, and 1 each had neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Interferon-alpha is an active and generally well-tolerated agent in favorable patients with minimal residual epithelial ovarian cancer at second-look surgery. These results are comparable to those achieved with cytotoxic chemotherapy. If Phase III trials are considered in the patients with minimal residual ovarian cancer, they should be limited to the platinum-sensitive patient population.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Lipo-Dox) for platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a Taiwanese gynecologic oncology group study with long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a distearoylphosphatidylcholine pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, Lipo-Dox, in platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: A multicenter phase II trial enrolled women with platinum-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma and na?ve to anthracycline. Eligible patients had either measurable tumor(s) or elevated serum CA 125 titer. Lipodox was initiated with a dose of 45 mg/m2 at a 4-week interval with subsequent escalation or reduction. A total of six cycles were scheduled. RESULTS: 29 patients, 20 with platinum-resistant and 9 with platinum refractory tumors, were enrolled. Lipo-Dox was given for an average of 4.6 cycles per patient with a total of 134 cycles. Among the 26 evaluable patients, one achieved CR, 5 PR and 9 SD. The overall response rate was 23.1% (95% CI, 6.8%-39.3%) with a median response duration of 11.6 weeks. 5 of the 6 responses were in patients with resistant disease. The median progression-free duration in the SD patients was 25.7 weeks. With a median follow-up of 13.8 months, the median progression-free and median overall survivals in the 26 patients were 5.4 months and 13.8 months, respectively. Hand-foot skin reaction occurred in 4.5% and skin pigmentation in 11.2% of all treatment cycles, all were Grade 1/2. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 14.2%, while anemia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 20.9%, 32.8% and 9% of cycle, respectively, and were mostly Grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: Lipo-Dox, the third liposome encapsulated doxorubicin, at 45 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, is effective against recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancers.     

Liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of single-agent dosages

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative activity and tolerance of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma at an initial dose of 40 or 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was performed on patients who received liposomal doxorubicin from 1/97 to 12/00. Demographic data, liposomal doxorubicin dose, dose reductions, response, and progression-free and overall survival were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients, 38 treated at 40 mg/m(2) and 40 treated at 50 mg/m(2), were identified. There was no difference with respect to patient age, performance status, percentage of patients who were platinum resistant or paclitaxel resistant, or tumor bulk. The response rate in this highly resistant population was 13.5 and 7.7% for liposomal doxorubicin at 40 and 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks, respectively. Stable disease was observed in 49 and 51% of patients treated with liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 40 and 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks, respectively. The progression-free survival for patients with responding and stable disease was similar. Dose reductions were required in 27.5% of patients treated at 50 mg/m(2) versus no patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) (P < 0.001). Treatment delays due to toxicity were required in 32.5% of patients treated at 50 mg/m(2) versus 16% of patients treated at 40 mg/m(2) (P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) appears to be as active as liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma and is better tolerated based on the frequency of dose reductions and treatment delays.     

A phase II evaluation of lapatinib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

Objective

Activation and dimerization of the ERBB family play a role in the pathogenesis and progression of ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of lapatinib in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to explore the clinical value of expression levels of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), phosphorylated EGFR, HER-2/neu, and Ki-67, and the presence of EGFR mutations.

Methods

Eligible patients had recurrent or persistent EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma, measurable disease, and up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for recurrent disease. Patients were treated with lapatinib 1500 mg/day. The primary endpoint of efficacy was 6-month progression free survival (PFS).

Results

Twenty-five of 28 patients were eligible and evaluable for analysis of efficacy and toxicity. Two (8.0%) were alive and progression-free at 6 months. No objective responses were observed. There were 1 grade 4 toxicity (fatigue) and few grade 3 toxicities. Associations between Ki-67 with prior platinum-free interval, PFS, and a polymorphism in EGFR were suggested.

Conclusions

Lapatinib has minimal activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. Ki-67 expression may be associated with prior PFS and a polymorphism in EGFR exon 20 (2361G>A, Q787Q).     

A phase II trial of topotecan in patients with advanced,persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the antitumor activity of topotecan in women with advanced, persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy, and to determine the nature and degree of toxicity of topotecan in this cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those who had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen. Topotecan 0.5 to 1.5 mg/m(2) was administered iv daily for 5 days, every 3 weeks, until progression of disease or adverse affects prohibited further therapy. RESULTS: Of 29 patients entered, 28 were evaluable for toxicity and 22 were evaluable for response. Patient characteristics included a median age of 65, with 41% having prior radiation and 14% having prior hormonal therapy. Nine patients (41%) had a performance status (PS) of 0, 11 (50%) had a PS of 1, and 2 (9%) had a PS of 2. Patients received from 2 to 11 (with a median of 4) courses of treatment. The most frequently observed grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia seen in 17 (61%) patients, leukopenia in 11 (39%), and thrombocytopenia in 7 (25%). Two deaths were considered potentially related to treatment. There was one (4.5%) complete and one (4.5%) partial response; 12 (55%) patients maintained stable disease and eight (36%) experienced increasing tumor. CONCLUSION: Topotecan at this dose and schedule does not appear to have major activity in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy.     

Phase I feasibility study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel followed by intraperitoneal paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

Purpose

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown a survival advantage over intravenous chemotherapy for women with newly diagnosed optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. However, significant toxicity has limited its acceptance. In an effort to reduce toxicity, the Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase I study to evaluate the feasibility of day 1 intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin followed by day 8 IP paclitaxel on an every 21-day cycle.

Methods

Patients with Stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal carcinomas or carcinosarcoma received paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV over 3 h followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m² IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8 of a 21 day cycle with 6 cycles planned. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia or dose-delay of greater than 2 weeks due to failure to recover counts, or Grade 3–5 non-hematologic toxicity occurring within the first 4 cycles of treatment.

Results

Twenty of 23 patients enrolled were evaluable and nineteen (95%) completed all six cycles of therapy. Three patients experienced a DLT consisting of infection with normal absolute neutrophil count, grade 3 hyperglycemia, and grade 4 abdominal pain.

Conclusions

This modified IP regimen which administers both IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin on day one, followed by IP paclitaxel on day eight, of a twenty-one day cycle appears feasible and is an attractive alternative to the intraperitoneal treatment regimen administered in GOG-0172.     

A phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin oxaliplatin and cyclophosphamide as second-line treatment in relapsed ovarian carcinoma

Abstract.   Valerio MR, Tagliaferri P, Raspagliesi F, Fulfaro F, Badalamenti G, Arcara C, Cicero G, Russo A, Venuta S, Guarneri G, Gebbia N. A phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin oxaliplatin and cyclophosphamide as second-line treatment in relapsed ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16(Suppl. 1): 79–85
We carried out a phase II nonrandomized study to examine the level of activity of oxaliplatin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in a patient population with relapsed ovarian cancer pretreated with platinum derivatives and paclitaxel. Patients received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m²), and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m²). A total of 49 patients (39 assessable for toxicity and response) were enrolled in this trial. Neutropenia grade 3 was observed in six patients (15%) and anemia grade 3 in one patient (0.2%). Fatigue grade 1–2 occurred in 26 patients (66%), nausea/vomiting grade 1 in 23 patients (58%), and alopecia grade 1–2 in 19 patients (48%). Twenty-one (53%) patients experienced grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy. The overall response rate was 46% (95% CI 23.6–68.7). Median progression-free survival was 28 weeks (range 12–52 weeks) and median survival was 45 weeks (range 26–136+ weeks). The mean duration of response was 34 weeks (range 16–52 weeks). In platinum-resistant and -refractory ovarian cancer patients, the overall response rate was 37% (CI 95% 14.4–60.8) with a progression-free survival of 28 weeks (range 12–52 weeks) and a median survival of 42 weeks (range 28–84 weeks). This combination chemotherapy is generally well tolerated and is an active second-line regimen against ovarian cancer.     

Phase II study of prolonged oral etoposide in refractory ovarian cancer

A phase II study of prolonged oral etoposide at 50 mg m⁻² was performed in patients with refractory ovarian cancer. A dose schedule algorithm was used to generate a calendar with the number of capsules to be administered each day and the date of blood tests. Fourteen of 15 patients were evaluable for response. Among the evaluable patients, 12 (86%) had poorly differentiated tumors, 13 (93%) had primary or secondary platin-resistant tumors, and 12 (86%) had progressed on a prior taxoid therapy. The median number of prior regimens was four (1–7). Despite the use of a 50-mg capsule of etoposide, the algorithm permitted the delivery of a median of 94% (89–107.5%) of the ideal calculated dose. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression with a grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in two-thirds of the patients. There were no deaths on the study and no significant neurologic or cardiovascular toxicity noted. There were no objective responses. The median survival of evaluable patients was 8.1 (95% CI 5.6–13.2) months.     

A multicenter phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and oxaliplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and oxaliplatin (LOHP) are active as single agents in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). This phase II study investigated the safety and activity of PLD and LOHP used in combination to treat ROC. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included disease recurrence after one (45%) or more lines (55%) of chemotherapy, performance status 3 months. Treatment was 40 mg/m(2) PLD and 120 mg/m(2) LOHP, administered over 2 days, every 3 weeks. Response to therapy was assessed using the RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Forty patients with ROC enrolled in the study from 10/2001 to 10/2005; 27 patients were platinum-sensitive and 13 were platinum-resistant. Major toxicities included grade 3-4 neutropenia (37%) and grade 2 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (10%). The overall response rate was 67.5%, with 30% stable disease rate and 2.5% progressive disease rate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.6 months, while median overall survival was 18.3 months, with no statistically significant difference in PFS between platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of PLD and LOHP shows activity in ROC with a manageable toxicity profile and can be safely administered in heavily pre-treated patients.     

A phase II clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), carboplatin, plus bevacizumab in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Methods

Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent disease received PLD 30 mg/m² and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 on Day 1 plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle, for a maximum of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) [complete + partial response]; additional endpoints were safety, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP).

Results

Of the 54 patients enrolled, 15 (27.8%) completed the study treatment as planned. Intent-to-treat (all enrolled patients) ORR was 72.2% (95% CI: 58.4, 83.5). Median duration of response was 11.9 months (95% CI: 9.3, not estimable) and median TTP was 13.9 months (95% CI: 11.4, 16.0). PFS was virtually the same as TTP. Three (5.6%) patients discontinued therapy due to disease progression, and another 3 (5.6 %) patients discontinued therapy due to serious adverse events (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 small/large intestinal obstruction/small intestinal perforation, and Grade 3 abdominal abscess). Fifty (92.6%) patients had ≥ 1 adverse event of interest, most commonly neutropenia (42.6%), hypertension (37.0%), stomatitis (37.0%), proteinuria (37.0%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (27.8%). No appreciable decreases in left-ventricular ejection fraction were observed.

Conclusion

Most patients responded to PLD, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination therapy. The safety profile was consistent with the known toxicities of these agents. These findings present a potential treatment option for women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.     

联合应用沙利度胺和脂质体阿霉素治疗复发性卵巢上皮性癌和腹膜癌的初步研究

目的:评价联合应用沙利度胺与脂质体阿霉素治疗复发性卵巢上皮性癌和腹膜癌的疗效和毒副作用。方法:将9例经手术和术后泰素+卡铂化疗后复发患者纳入本研究。每4周予以脂质体阿霉素30~50mg/m2化疗,共3~8个疗程;同时每日予以沙利度胺100~300mg,其剂量从100mg/d开始,此后每2周增加50~100mg。通过体检、影像学检查和测定CA125水平评价治疗效果。结果:9例患者的中位年龄为56岁(35~81岁),FIGO分期为ⅢB~Ⅳ期。本次化疗的中位疗程数是6个疗程。中位随访时间为18.5个月。最常见的不良反应为疲劳(55.6%)和神经系统症状(55.6%)。3例患者出现Ⅲ度副反应,1例为无力、1例过敏性皮疹和1例末梢神经感觉异常。根据RECIST标准评价有病灶的6例患者疗效,2例部分缓解,2例治疗中疾病无进展,1例病情进展,1例失访。另有2例CA125升高的患者,在联合化疗3~4个疗程后CA125水平降低50%以上。1例二次肿瘤细胞减灭术后化疗的患者治疗后随访36个月无肿瘤复发迹象。在随访的8例患者中,中位疾病无进展时间为6.5个月(0~36个月);中位总的生存时间为20.5个月(8~36个月)。结论:联合应用沙利度胺与脂质体阿霉素治疗复发性卵巢上皮性癌具有可接受的毒副作用,同时具有一定的治疗效果。     

Retrospective comparative study of irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

Purpose

This study was conducted to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Nineteen patients who received CPT-11 and eleven patients who received PLD were enrolled. CPT-11 was intravenously administered at a starting dose of 60–100 mg/m² on day 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days, and PLD was administered at a starting dose of 40–50 mg/m² on day 1 every 28 days. Primary outcomes were overall response rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), disease control rate (CR + PR + stable disease), and progression-free survival (PFS) in each group. Clinical response was evaluated every two or three cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria; CA125 analysis was not performed.

Results

The overall response rate was 21.1 % (PR, four cases) and 0 % (p = 0.10) in the CPT-11 and PLD groups, respectively, and the disease control rate was 73.7 and 45.5 % (p = 0.12), respectively. Median PFS was 25.3 (range 5.4–69.9) weeks and 12.7 (range 4.0–43.1) weeks in the CPT-11 and PLD groups, respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.064). Major adverse events in the CPT-11 group were neutropenia, nausea, and diarrhea, whereas those in the PLD group included thrombocytopenia, anemia, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome.

Conclusions

This retrospective study demonstrated comparable efficacy outcomes for CPT-11 and PLD. The overall response rate, disease control rate, and median PFS were more favorable in the CPT-11 group compared to the PLD group, although the difference was not significant. The adverse event profiles were different between groups. These results suggest that CPT-11 might be a feasible choice as single-agent salvage chemotherapy for platinum-resistant or -refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma beside established regimen like PLD.     

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in advanced gynecologic cancers

OBJECTIVE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) may have enhanced therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity compared with the parent compound. This phase II study further evaluates the activity of Doxil in patients with ovarian cancer and explores activity in other gynecologic cancers. METHODS: Sixty-three patients were treated with Doxil 50 mg/m(2) infused over 1 h; 44 were evaluable. Forty-eight had epithelial ovarian cancer and all received prior treatment with cisplatin and paclitaxel: 27 received two to six prior regimens, 44 were platinum resistant, 21 patients had measurable disease, and 27 had evaluable disease only. RESULTS: The overall survival of these patients was 10 months (range, 0.25-33); progression-free survival was 3 months (range, 0.25-18). The response rate among those with measurable disease was 19%, with a median duration of 4.5 months (range, 3-12). The response rate of 22 patients with elevated CA-125 was 59%; median duration was 3.5 months (range, 1-12). Also, 27% achieved prolonged stabilization of disease for a median of 7 months (range, 5-18). Overall, treatment was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population. Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were: 5 grade 3 stomatitis, 3 grade 3 skin, 1 each grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 5 admits for infection, and no neutropenic fever; nausea and vomiting were uncommon in 204 cycles to ovarian cancer patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the activity of Doxil in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer and poor prognostic features and confirms the prolonged responses and favorable toxicity profile. Encouraging findings were also observed in the patients with nonovarian gynecologic cancers.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide as initial treatment for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide in the first-line treatment of patients with stage III or IV adenocarcinoma of the ovary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients entering this trial received paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), 1 h IV infusion, day 1; carboplatin AUC 6.0 IV, day 1; etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg orally, days 1-10. Patients received 6 courses of treatment, administered at 21-day intervals. All patients were assigned a response category using clinical restaging criteria. The primary endpoints for this trial were progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Between October 1996 and April 2001, 52 patients were treated. The overall objective response rate for the 48 evaluable patients was 75%, with 46% complete responses. Amongst the 36 patients with suboptimal disease, median progression-free and overall survivals were 12 and 24 months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 months, the median progression-free and overall survival has not been reached for the optimal patients; 5-year progression-free survival is 57% for this group. Treatment-related myelosuppression was common, but myelosuppression-related complications were uncommon, as was grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. No episodes of acute myelogenous leukemia have developed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide was feasible and effective in this patient population. Unlike previous reports, no episodes of acute leukemia were seen following this treatment. Definitive conclusions regarding the benefit of adding etoposide to a taxane/platinum combination will require a comparative trial.     

A phase II trial of radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study

Objectives

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy and concurrent weekly cisplatin chemotherapy in achieving a complete clinical and pathologic response when used for the primary treatment of locally-advanced vulvar carcinoma.

Methods

Patients with locally-advanced (T3 or T4 tumors not amenable to surgical resection via radical vulvectomy), previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were treated with radiation (1.8 Gy daily × 32 fractions = 57.6 Gy) plus weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) followed by surgical resection of residual tumor (or biopsy to confirm complete clinical response). Management of the groin lymph nodes was standardized and was not a statistical endpoint. Primary endpoints were complete clinical and pathologic response rates of the primary vulvar tumor.

Results

A planned interim analysis indicated sufficient activity to reopen the study to a second stage of accrual. Among 58 evaluable patients, there were 40 (69%) who completed study treatment. Reasons for prematurely discontinuing treatment included: patient refusal (N = 4), toxicity (N = 9), death (N = 2), other (N = 3). There were 37 patients with a complete clinical response (37/58; 64%). Among these women there were 34 who underwent surgical biopsy and 29 (78%) who also had a complete pathological response. Common adverse effects included leukopenia, pain, radiation dermatitis, pain, or metabolic changes.

Conclusions

This combination of radiation therapy plus weekly cisplatin successfully yielded high complete clinical and pathologic response rates with acceptable toxicity.     

Simultaneously detected endometrial and ovarian carcinomas--a prospective clinicopathologic study of 74 cases: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES: The coexistence of carcinomas of the endometrium and ovary occurs in about 10% of women with ovarian carcinoma. It is often unclear whether this represents synchronous primary tumors or metastasis from endometrium to ovary, or from ovary to endometrium; consequently, staging, therapy, and expected outcome are uncertain. The Gynecologic Oncology Group sought to study patients with simultaneously detected adenocarcinomas in the endometrium and ovary with disease grossly confined to the pelvis to explore the possible correlation among discrete tumor subsets, natural history, and survival. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1991, 85 patients were prospectively enrolled, of whom 74 were eligible. All were initially treated with total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging laparotomy, with radiation and chemotherapy left to the discretion of the treating physician and patient. Fifteen pathologic variables were examined to identify differences in tumor behavior. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, 23 (31%) had microscopic spread of tumor in the pelvis or abdomen. Sixty-four (86%) patients had endometrioid carcinomas in both the endometrium and the ovary, and endometriosis was found in the ovary of 23 (31%) patients. There was concordance between the histologic grade of the tumor in the ovary and the uterus in 51 (69%) patients. The estimated probability of recurrence 5 years following staging surgery is 15.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.7-25.2%). The presence of metastasis discriminated two groups of patients that experienced different probabilities of recurrence within 5 years: 10.0% (95% CI: 4.32-21.3%) for those with tumors confined to the uterus and ovary and 27.1% (95% CI: 13.0-48.5%) for those with metastasis (hazard ratio = 4.6, P = 0.006). The histologic grades of ovarian and uterine tumors also distinguished groups of patients with different probabilities of recurrence at 5 years: 8.0% (95% CI: 2.8-21.3%) for those patients with no more than grade 1 disease at either site and 22.4% (95% CI: 11.8-38.4%) for those with a higher grade in either the ovary or the endometrium (hazard ratio = 3.1, P = 0.047). The estimated overall probability of surviving 5 years is 85.9% and that of surviving 10 years is 80.3%. CONCLUSION: The prognosis for women with simultaneously detected carcinomas in the uterus and ovary with gross disease confined to the pelvis is surprisingly good, particularly for those with disease microscopically limited to the uterus and ovary or of low histologic grade.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine (gemzar, LY188011) in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

Objective

The study aims to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

Patients with advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium previously treated with one chemotherapy regimen were treated on a phase II trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Gemcitabine was administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 800 mg/m² over 30 min on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.

Results

Twenty-four patients were entered by 11 GOG member institutions. One patient was ineligible due to wrong primary tumor. A total of ninety 21-day cycles of therapy were administered with 35% of patients receiving four or more cycles. All patients had been previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. One patient had a partial response (4%), nine had stable disease (39%), and twelve had increasing disease (52%). The median progression-free survival was 1.7 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated with only 22% of patients experiencing grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic toxicity. There was one treated-related death due to pulmonary toxicity.

Conclusion

Gemcitabine has minimal activity in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma at the dose and schedule tested.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.