Associations of Plasma Bioactive Adrenomedullin Levels with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in breast cancer survivors. Effective screening modalities to identify CVD risk are lacking in this population. Adrenomedullin (ADM) has been suggested as a biomarker for subclinical cardiac dysfunction in the general population. Levels of ADM have been proven to be responsive to lifestyle changes that lead to improved cardiovascular health. As BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are deemed to be at an increased risk for CVD, the aim of this study was to examine plasma ADM levels in a cohort of BRCA mutation carriers and to assess their association with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods Plasma ADM concentrations were measured in 292 female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with and without a history of breast cancer. Subjects were classified into high versus low ADM levels based on the median ADM level in the entire cohort (13.8 pg/mL). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of having elevated ADM levels by several cardiovascular risk factors. Results Of all women (median age: 43 years), 57.5% had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. The median time between diagnosis and study entry was three years (range: 0 – 32 years). Women presenting with metabolic syndrome had 22-fold increased odds of having elevated ADM levels (p < 0.001). Elevated ADM levels were associated with lower cardiorespiratory fitness (OR = 0.88, p < 0.001) and several parameters of obesity (p < 0.001). ADM levels were higher in women who have ever smoked (OR = 1.72, p = 0.02). ADM levels were not associated with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer (p = 0.28). Conclusions This is the first study in BRCA mutation carriers that has linked circulating ADM levels to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The long-term clinical implications of these findings are yet to be determined. Key words: BRCA1, BRCA2, cardiovascular risk, breast cancer survivors     

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutation carriers

Background  

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is often recommended to carriers of deleterious breast cancer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations in order to reduce their breast cancer risk by 50% and their ovarian cancer risk by approximately 95%. To evaluate the acceptance, timing, histopathology findings and follow-up results we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies.     

Prophylaktische Operationen

Background

Women carrying a deleterious mutation in the high risk genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 face an increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduce these risks and improve overall survival.

Results and discussion

A decision for or against risk-reducing surgery should be based on an individual risk calculation, a comprehensible communication of these risks and should be implemented in a risk-adapted concept of preventive measures. Mutation carriers with and without cancer are accompanied in the decision-making process by doctors of the specialized centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer by non-directive counselling.     

Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients

Objectives

Our aim was to determine if BRCA mutation status changes surgical decision making in women who undergo genetic testing after the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of breast cancer patients who had BRCA mutation testing performed prior to surgery. We compared surgical choice and change in surgical choice in women who tested positive for a BRCA mutation with those who tested negative. Surgery was considered the most definitive surgery within a year of diagnosis. Other data collected included age, race, stage, histology, receptor status, adjuvant treatment, gravity, parity, and family history. Variables were compared by BRCA status using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression.

Results

Three hundred and two women were included. Thirty-two (10.6%) were identified as carrying a BRCA mutation. Most women had early stage disease (55.6% T1 lesions, 72.8% node negative); 55.6% had breast-conserving surgery, and the remaining had unilateral or bilateral mastectomy. BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to have both a personal history of breast cancer (RR 2.74, 95% CI = 1.08–6.98) and hormone receptor-negative tumors (56.0% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.002). BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to choose bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction (56.3% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.0001); 71.9% of BRCA mutation carriers opted for a different surgery than what was initially planned by their surgeon as compared to 29% of mutation-negative patients (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

BRCA mutation testing strongly influences surgical decision making in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. For women who meet NCCN referral guidelines, genetic evaluation should be performed prior to surgical intervention.     

Ki-67 and p53 expression of the fallopian tube mucosa in breast cancer patients with hereditary risk

Purpose

The fallopian tube has been implicated as a site of origin of sporadic and BRCA1-related ovarian cancer. To investigate if Ki-67 or p53 is altered in BRCA1 mutation carriers, we have studied the expression of these markers in morphologically normal mucosa in the fallopian tube and fimbriae.

Methods

Prophylactic adnexectomy specimens from 24 patients (eight BRCA1 mutation carriers, eight non-mutation carriers, and eight with unknown BRCA1 status), were scored by automated image analysis for the amount of Ki-67 and wild-type p53 expression. All patients had a history of breast cancer and a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

Results

In the fimbriae, a median of 0.42 % Ki-67 and 0.04 % p53-positive epithelial cells was present, compared to a median of 0.36 % for Ki-67 and 0.05 % for p53 in the fallopian tube. Ki-67 expression decreased significantly with age (r = ?0.45, p = 0.028). In contrast, p53 expression was not age-dependent for the whole group of patients (r = 0.25, p = 0.25). Subgroup analysis revealed a difference for p53 expression of the BRCA1 mutation carriers with respect to age (median 0.039 vs. 0.082 % for age less or greater than 50.5 years). Consequently, the p53/Ki-67 ratio showed an age-dependent increase, which was accelerated in the BRCA1-positive patients.

Conclusions

Ki-67 and p53 expression varies in morphologically normal tubal epithelial cells depending on age and BRCA1 mutation status. This may reflect an altered and age-dependent DNA repair in BRCA1 mutation carriers and may be related to increased risk of ovarian cancer arising in the fallopian tube.     

Acceptability of prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as risk-reducing surgery among BRCA mutation carriers

Objective

Given the emerging evidence for the fimbria as the site of origin for many serous carcinomas in BRCA mutation carriers, consideration is being given in studying prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (PSDO) as a risk-reducing surgery. We aimed to determine the interest in a study of PSDO among these women.

Methods

We evaluated the results of an online survey conducted by Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE), a patient advocacy group, from October 2010 to August 2012. Premenopausal BRCA mutation carriers with no history of ovarian cancer or prior bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) were included.

Results

Of the 204 women meeting inclusion criteria, median age was 35 years, 92.5% were white, 25.7% were Jewish, and 16.7% had a history of breast cancer. Overall, 34.3% reported interest in a study of salpingectomy, 35.3% were unsure, and 30.4% were not interested in the study. Women noted the possibility of lowering ovarian cancer risk without menopause as a compelling reason to participate (83.8%). Reasons for not participating in a salpingectomy study included surgical complications (46.6%), potential ovarian damage (42.2%), planning BSO soon (32.4%), and surgical costs (32.8%). Acceptable study risks included the need for two surgeries (77.2%), possibility of not lowering ovarian cancer risk (68%), and disruption of ovarian blood supply (66.5%).

Conclusions

One-third of BRCA mutation carriers indicated definite interest in a PSDO study. Potential study risks were acceptable to most women. These findings suggest that patient accrual for a clinical trial of prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is possible.     

Characteristics of women with ovarian carcinoma who have BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations not identified by clinical testing

ObjectivesFew studies have comprehensively tested all ovarian cancer patients for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations. We sought to determine if clinically identified mutation carriers differed in clinical characteristics and outcomes from mutation carriers not identified during routine clinical care.MethodsWe included women with ovarian, tubal or peritoneal carcinoma. BROCA, an assay using targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing was used to identify mutations in BRCA1/2 and 19 other tumor suppressor genes. We identified subjects with BRCA1/2 mutations using BROCA that had not previously received standard genetic testing (BROCA, n = 37) and compared them to subjects with BRCA1/2 mutations identified during routine clinical care (known, n = 70), and to those wildtype for 21 genes using BROCA (wildtype, n = 291).ResultsBROCA mutation carriers were older than known carriers, median age of 58 (range 41–77), vs. 51 (range 33-76, p = 0.003, Mann–Whitney). 58/70 (82.9%) of known carriers had a strong family history, compared with 15/37 (40.5%) of BROCA carriers, p < 0.0001, (Fisher's Exact). Median overall survival was significantly worse for BROCA mutation carriers compared to known mutation carriers, (45 vs. 93 months, p < 0.0001, HR 3.47 (1.79–6.72), Log-rank test). The improved survival for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (known and BROCA) compared with wildtype cases (69 vs. 44 months, p = 0.0001, HR 0.58 (0.43–0.77), Log-rank test) was driven by known mutation carriers.ConclusionsOlder age, absence of a strong family history, and poor survival are all associated with decreased clinical identification of inherited BRCA1/2 mutations in women with ovarian cancer. Using age and family history to direct genetic testing will miss a significant percentage of mutation carriers. Testing should be initiated at the time of diagnosis to maximize identification of mutations and minimize survival bias.     

Breast cancer prevention in high-risk women

Women at high risk of developing breast cancer are a heterogeneous group of women including those with and without high-risk germline mutation/s. Prevention in these women requires a personalised and multidisciplinary approach. Preventive therapy with selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) like tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) substantially reduces breast cancer risk well beyond the active treatment period. The importance of benign breast disease as a marker of increased breast cancer risk remains underappreciated, and although the benefit of preventive therapy may be greater in such women, preventive therapy remains underutilised in these and other high-risk women. Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy (BRRM) reduces the risk of developing breast cancer by 90% in high-risk women such as carriers of BRCA mutations. It also improves breast cancer-specific survival in BRCA1 carriers. Bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may also reduce risk in premenopausal BRCA2 carriers. Further research to improve risk models, to identify surrogate biomarkers of preventive therapy benefit and to develop newer preventive agents is needed.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> mutation carriers have a lower number of mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation for IVF/PGD

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine whether BRCA1/2 mutation carriers produce fewer mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), in comparison to a PGD control group.

Methods

A retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study was performed on data of first PGD cycles performed between January 2006 and September 2015. Data were extracted from medical files. The study was performed in one PGD center and three affiliated IVF centers in the Netherlands and one PGD center in Belgium. Exposed couples underwent PGD because of a pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation, controls for other monogenic conditions. Only couples treated in a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist-suppressive protocol, stimulated with at least 150 IU follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), were included. Women suspected to have a diminished ovarian reserve status due to chemotherapy, auto-immune disorders, or genetic conditions (other than BRCA1/2 mutations) were excluded. A total of 106 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers underwent PGD in this period, of which 43 (20 BRCA1 and 23 BRCA2 mutation carriers) met the inclusion criteria. They were compared to 174 controls selected by frequency matching.

Results

Thirty-eight BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (18 BRCA1 and 20 BRCA2 mutation carriers) and 154 controls proceeded to oocyte pickup. The median number of mature oocytes was 7.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 4.0–9.0) in the BRCA group as a whole, 6.5 (IQR 4.0–8.0) in BRCA1 mutation carriers, 7.5 (IQR 5.5–9.0) in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 8.0 (IQR 6.0–11.0) in controls. Multiple linear regression analysis with the number of mature oocytes as a dependent variable and adjustment for treatment center, female age, female body mass index (BMI), type of gonadotropin used, and the total dose of gonadotropins administered revealed a significantly lower yield of mature oocytes in the BRCA group as compared to controls (p = 0.04). This finding could be fully accounted for by the BRCA1 subgroup (BRCA1 mutation carriers versus controls p = 0.02, BRCA2 mutation carriers versus controls p = 0.50).

Conclusions

Ovarian response to stimulation, expressed as the number of mature oocytes, was reduced in BRCA1 but not in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Although oocyte yield was in correspondence to a normal response in all subgroups, this finding points to a possible negative influence of the BRCA1 gene on ovarian reserve.

     

BRCA1 und BRCA2 − genetische und nichtgenetische Einflussfaktoren

Background

The lifelong risk for breast cancer and ovarian cancer differs among carriers of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Cancer risk is modulated by a multitude of genetic and non-genetic factors. For the decision on intensified surveillance or prophylactic mastectomy no risk modifiers are so far taken into account.

Aims

This article examines whether genetic and non-genetic factors modify the risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers and which are integrated into currently used risk calculation programs.

Results and discussion

A number of genetic low risk variants have been identified and validated in genome-wide association studies. Several of these modify the risk of sporadic and BRCA-associated breast cancer and others are specific for each type. The results of initial studies suggest that lifestyle factors and reproductive history can also modify the risk of breast cancer for BRCA-associated tumors. Current risk calculation programs estimate the individual cancer risk based on assumptions on major genes with high penetrance and on the family pedigree over three generations. Some of these also take clinical data, such as previous operations, histopathological features of tumors, reproductive factors and body mass index into account but no explicit low risk variants. Ongoing research on modifying genetic and non-genetic risk factors aims to establish a more differentiated and comprehensive risk prediction model in order to prevent overtreatment with respect to preventive strategies. Additionally, knowledge on individual trigger mechanisms of potential breast or ovarian cancer might lead to targeted prevention by medicinal therapy and lifestyle interventions.     

Risiko für Brust- und Eierstockkrebs

Patients and health care providers are becoming increasingly more aware of the significance of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The identification of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 enabled predictive analysis for breast and ovarian cancer by analysis of the family tree. Comprehensive interdisciplinary counseling concerning risks, possibilities and limits should always precede genetic testing. The recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on counseling and testing procedure are described. Moreover, an intensified surveillance program and prophylactic operations are available for mutation carriers. The latter is becoming increasingly more accepted. Importantly, preliminary data on the chemotherapeutic response suggest that BRCA associated tumors respond differently compared to sporadic tumors. Also the specific signaling pathway of the BRCA genes may allow the development of new molecular targets such as PARP inhibitors. Therefore, large scale therapeutic trials are needed in order to evaluate promising new targeted drugs and platinum-containing chemotherapy in BRCA-associated cancer.     

Role of Routine Peritoneal Biopsies During Risk Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy (RRSO)

Objective The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the role of routine peritoneal biopsies during risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Methods Data of 204 women who underwent RRSO between January 1, 2014 and February 20, 2020 at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte were retrospectively analyzed. RRSO was done according to the standard operating procedures of the German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) with peritoneal washing and several peritoneal biopsies. Specimen collected during RRSO were analyzed using the protocol for Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbria (SEE-FIM). Perioperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo-Classification. Results 147 women who underwent RRSO had peritoneal biopsies and pelvic washing, 44 women had none of that. 123 patients (64.4%) carried a pathologic variant in gBRCA1 , 53 (27.7%) carried a pathologic variant in gBRCA2 . Histopathological evaluation identified four patients (2.1%) with pathological findings. Neither peritoneal biopsies nor pelvic washings revealed additional information after histological examination. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between the two groups. The mean surgery time for RRSO without peritoneal biopsies was 64.3 minutes compared to 77.8 minutes with peritoneal biopsies. That shows a statistically significant prolongation of 16% (13.5 minutes, p = 0.0383). Conclusions The routine use of peritoneal biopsies during RRSO does not improve detection of occult ovarian cancer or STIC but prolongs the operation time significantly. By omitting peritoneal biopsies in RRSO not only perioperative risks are diminished but also costs could be reduced by shortening of surgery time as well as decreased number of pathological samples. Key words: hereditary ovarian cancer, risk-reducing surgery, salpingo-oophorectomy, hereditary breast cancer, BRCA     

BRCA mutation testing for first-degree relatives of women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer

BackgroundWomen with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) have a 20% chance of carrying a BRCA1 or 2 mutation. Not all undergo genetic testing, and there is a large legacy group of untested patients. Their female first-degree relatives (FDR) may not qualify for testing unless they have specific ethnicity, or personal/family cancer history. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate risk-reducing strategies for these FDR who are ineligible for testing.MethodsA Markov Monte Carlo simulation model estimated the costs and benefits of 3 strategies for female FDR of HGSC patients whose BRCA status is unknown: (1) no BRCA testing; (2) universal BRCA testing, followed by risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) for mutation carriers; (3) universal RRBSO, without BRCA testing. Effectiveness was estimated in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains over a 50-year time horizon. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around various parameters.ResultsUniversal BRCA testing for female FDR of women with HGSC yielded a higher average QALY gain at acceptable cost compared to no BRCA testing, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $7888 per QALY. Universal BRCA testing was more effective and less costly than universal RRBSO (19.20 QALYs vs. 18.52 QALYs, and $10,135 vs. $14,231, respectively). Results were stable over wide ranges of plausible costs and estimates. Compliance with hormone replacement therapy had to exceed 79.3% for universal RRBSO to be the most effective strategy.ConclusionBRCA mutation testing should be offered to all female first-degree relatives of women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer when BRCA mutation status is unknown.     

Modalités de fonctionnement d’un centre de suivi des femmes à haut risque de cancer du sein et de l’ovaire : une expérience à l’hôpital Tenon

High risk may be defined as either an absolute risk greater than 20 % or a relative risk greater than 4. Concerning breast and ovarian cancer, high risk patients include carriers of a constitutive deleterious mutation of BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, patients with a significant family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and patients who have been diagnosed a benign breast lesion with a high risk of degeneration, i.e. atypical hyperplasia. Following up such patients relies on specific strategies. A center including a large panel of physicians involved in the various modalities for patients’ management (geneticians, radiologists, gynecologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, endocrinologists, psychologists, medical oncologists) has been created at Tenon Hospital with this purpose. The collaboration of these different specialists with the referent physician of the patient allows for the definition and the implementation of a patient-centered follow-up continuously updated to take into account the different periods of a woman's life, according to best practices recommendations and the evolving state-of-the art.     

The risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of ovarian cancer after a primary diagnosis of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and to identify host and treatment-related factors that might modify the risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were 491 women with stage I or stage II breast cancer, diagnosed from 1975 to 2000 and for whom a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had been identified. Patients were followed from the initial diagnosis of breast cancer until either ovarian cancer, prophylactic oophorectomy, death, or 2002. The medical treatment records and pathology documents were reviewed. Information that was abstracted from the medical charts included date of breast cancer diagnosis, stage of disease, use of chemotherapy, use of radiation therapy, usage of tamoxifen, oophorectomy, recurrence, second malignancy, and vital status. RESULTS: The 10-year actuarial risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer was 12.7% for BRCA1 carriers and 6.8% for BRCA2 carriers (P = 0.03). The use of tamoxifen (OR = 1.79; P = 0.16) and chemotherapy (OR = 0.59; P = 0.15) did not significantly impact on the risk of subsequent ovarian cancer. Twenty-five percent of the deaths in women with stage I breast cancer were due to a subsequent ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of ovarian cancer suggests that oophorectomy should be recommended in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with a diagnosis of breast cancer, especially those with stage I disease. Breast cancer systemic therapy did not significantly alter the risk of ovarian cancer.     

Conventional ICSI improves the euploid embryo rate in male reciprocal translocation carriers

PurposeTo evaluate whether the morphologically normal spermatozoa selected for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) under microscope had a higher rate of normal/balanced chromosome contents than that in the whole unselected sperm from reciprocal translocation carriers.MethodsFive hundred unselected spermatozoa from each of 40 male translocation carriers were performed with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to determine the rates of gametes with different meiotic contents of translocated chromosomes. Meanwhile, 3030 biopsied blastocysts from 239 male and 293 female reciprocal translocation carriers were detected with the microarray technique to analyze the rates of embryos with different translocated chromosome contents.ResultsThe D3 embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, and euploid rate of blastocysts were remarkably higher in male carriers than those in female (p = 0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.035, respectively). In addition, the percentages of alternate products, which contained normal/balanced chromosome contents, in embryos from male carriers were markedly higher than those in sperm FISH (p = 2.48 × 10⁻⁵ and p = 2.88 × 10⁻¹⁰), while the percentages of adjacent-2 and 3:1 products were lower than those in sperm FISH (p = 0.003 and p = 5.28 × 10⁻⁴⁴). Moreover, consistent results were obtained when comparing the rates of products in embryos between male and female carriers. Specifically, the incidence of alternate products in male carriers was higher than those in female carriers (p = 0.022). However, no similar differences were seen between sperm and embryos of female carriers.ConclusionICSI facilitates the selection of spermatozoa with normal/balanced chromosome contents and improves the D3 embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, and the euploid embryo rate in male carriers.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-020-02013-z.     

Is Uterine Papillary Serous Adenocarcinoma a Manifestation of the Hereditary Breast–Ovarian Cancer Syndrome?

Background. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) shares common pathologic, genetic, and clinical features with other serous cancers of müllerian origin. The most common histologic type of ovarian tumor associated with BRCA mutations is papillary serous. Because of these histologic similarities, we postulated that, in some cases, UPSC may be a manifestation of a field defect in BRCA1 carriers, which also includes ovarian carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma.Methods. Fifty-six living patients with UPSC were contacted through their treating physicians and agreed to a family history interview and to provide a blood specimen for BRCA testing. The protein truncation test was used to detect mutations in exons 10 and 11 of BRCA1 and in exon 11 of BRCA2. The presence of four common mutations was assessed by PCR-based specific assays.Results. A high proportion of patients had a past history of breast cancer (11%) or a first-degree relative with breast cancer (29%). Four patients were from families with site-specific hereditary breast cancer. However, there was no clear example of the hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome, and none of the 56 patients was found to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.Conclusions. BRCA mutations do not appear to predispose to UPSC and this type of cancer does not appear to be a manifestation of the classical hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome. The observed association between UPSC and breast cancer may be due to the presence of mutations in other cancer predisposing genes.     

Endometrial Cancer in Germline BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ObjectiveRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is standard treatment among women with BRCA mutations. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers and to examine the justifiability of prophylactic hysterectomy at the time of RRSO.Data SourcesPubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BIOSIS, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched. Eleven articles were selected and analyzed using the OpenMetaAnalyst 2012 software.Methods of Study SelectionRandomized controlled studies, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating the risk of EC and specifically uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were included. Articles were excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria, or if data were not reported and the authors did not respond to inquiries. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Dichotomous results from each of the studies eligible for the meta-analysis were expressed as the proportion of patients with EC or UPSC per total number of BRCA mutation carriers, with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Mantel–Haenszel statistical method was used.Tabulation, Integration, and ResultsEleven studies reported the outcome of interest and were included in the final meta-analysis. In total, 13 871 carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified. The pooled prevalence rates of EC and UPSC in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were 82/13 827 (0.59%) and 19/11 582 (0.16%), respectively. The EC prevalence was 46/7429 (0.62%) in BRCA1 mutation carriers and 17/3546 (0.47%) in BRCA2 mutation carriers, with relative risk of 1.18 (95% CI, 0.7–2.0). For UPSC, the prevalence was 15/7429 (0.2%) and 3/3546 (0.08%) among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively, (relative risk 1.39; 95% CI, 0.5–3.7).ConclusionMost studies in this meta-analysis suggest a slightly increased risk of EC in BRCA mutation carriers, mainly for BRCA1. The decision regarding concurrent hysterectomy should be tailored individually to each patient on the basis of the patient's age, type of mutation, future need for hormone replacement treatment, history of breast cancer, tamoxifen use, and personal operative risks.     

Perioperative Management of Women Undergoing Risk-reducing Surgery for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Carriers of genetic mutations that predispose to cancer syndromes are often faced with complex decisions. For women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in particular, the decision to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is burdensome from a physical and psychological perspective. Although risk-reducing surgery is the most effective preventative measure in reducing a genetic mutation carrier's risk of breast or ovarian cancer, the success of these procedures requires a multidisciplinary approach that centers on careful counseling regarding the risks and benefits of risk-reducing surgery. The physical and psychological distress associated with risk-reducing surgery often makes a combined surgical approach attractive to some patients. In this review, we present the evidence surrounding the comprehensive surgical care of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes and evaluate the perioperative factors that influence surgical management.