食管运动功能在重度反流性食管炎中的地位

目的　通过对重度反流性食管炎(RE)治愈前后食管体部运动功能的研究,了解食管体部运动功能在重度RE中的地位。方法　对70例胃食管反流病患者进行食管压力测定。从中筛选23例重度RE(内镜诊断为洛杉矶C和D级食管炎);且24h食管内pH监测证实为病理性酸反流;食管压力测定证实有食管体部运动障碍患者。给予兰索拉唑30mg/d治疗3~6个月至内镜下食管炎完全愈合后,再行食管压力测定,观察下食管括约肌静息压(LESP)及食管体部运动功能的变化。以湿咽成功率、食管远端收缩波幅和食管蠕动的传导速度作为食管体部运动功能的指标。结果　食管炎治愈前后,LESP[ (6 00±0 86 )mmHg比(5 10±0 87)mmHg, 1kPa=7 5mmHg, P=0 476],食管远端收缩波幅[ (34 1±4 1)mmHg比(37 2±4 0)mmHg,P=0 593]、湿咽成功率[ (33 5±6 5)%比(38 6±7 1 )%,P=0 592 ]比较差异均无统计学意义,其均值仍显著低于正常对照组。结论　治愈食管炎并不能提高LESP及改善食管体部的运动功能。食管体部运动功能障碍和酸反流是RE的重要发病机制,尤其是重度RE。     

上消化道运动障碍与胃食管反流病相关性研究

目的 分析胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的胃及胆囊运动特点,探讨胃及胆囊运动障碍在GERD发病中的作用,以期有助于临床诊断.方法 应用B超对60例GERD患者和30例健康志愿者进行餐后胃及胆囊运动功能监测,并根据内镜检查结果,把GERD患者分为反流性食管炎(EE)组、非糜烂性反流病(NERD)组,然后分别比较GERD组与健康对照组以及EE组与NERD组之间的胃及胆囊运动参数.结果 GERD组的胃排空指数平均值与对照组比明显降低(P<0.01),胆囊排空指数平均值与对照组比降低,但差异无统计学意义.EE组胃排空指数平均值较NERD组低,且差异具有统计学意义;两组且日囊排空指数无差异.结论 胃动力障碍参与了GERD的发病.GERD患者存在的胃动力障碍以胃排空延缓为主.GERD患者未发现明显胆囊排空障碍.     

Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility and hyperactive acid sensitization in patients with gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Esophageal motor abnormalities including ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and visceral hypersensitivity have been frequently observed in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. The aim of this study was to observe the incidences of hypersensitivity to acid infusion and motor abnormalities in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) compared with erosive esophagitis. METHODS: We performed upper GI endoscopy, an acid perfusion test and esophageal manometry on 113 NERD patients and 37 erosive esophagitis patients. RESULTS: The frequency of acid sensitization was 69.9% in NERD and 67.6% in erosive esophagitis. The frequency of esophageal motor abnormality in patients with erosive esophagitis (48.6%) was higher than in patients with NERD (25.7%, P = 0.014). The most frequent esophageal motor abnormality was IEM. The frequency of IEM was 15.9% in NERD patients, 42.9% in Los Angeles grade A, 53.8% in Los Angeles grade B and 66.7% in Los Angeles grade C esophagitis (chi(2) = 16.67, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that no difference exists between visceral hypersensitivity in patients with NERD and those with erosive esophagitis, and that IEM occurs in NERD as well as erosive esophagitis patients. The occurrence of IEM is associated with the endoscopic severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

健康志愿者和胃食管反流病患者食管动力的性别差异

背景：食管动力受多种因素影响，性别因素对食管动力的影响尚不清楚。目的：探讨健康志愿者、非糜烂性反流病（NERD）和反流性食管炎（RE）患者食管动力的性别差异。方法：83例健康志愿者以及具有典型胃食管反流症状的NERD患者196例和RE患者104例纳入本研究。受试者行食管测压，测定下食管括约肌压力（LESP）和食管体部运动功能（包括食管体部各段蠕动收缩波幅、蠕动波传导速度和湿咽成功率）。结果：RE组男性患者比例显著高于NERD组（69．2％对43．4％，P〈0．05）。健康对照组和NERD组男性基础LESP较女性显著降低（P〈0．05），男性健康志愿者食管体部近端蠕动收缩波幅显著低于女性（P〈0．05），男性RE患者湿咽成功率显著低于女性患者（P〈0．05）。男性NERD患者LESP降低发生率显著高于女性患者（45．9％对29．7％，P〈0．05），男性RE患者食管体部运动功能障碍发生率显著高于女性患者（68．1％对46．9％，P〈0．05）。结论：无论是胃食管反流病（GERD）患者还是健康志愿者，男性的食管动力均较女性差，男性性别是GERD发病的危险因素之一。     

十二指肠胃食管反流在胃食管反流病中的作用

目的　研究十二指肠胃食管反流 (DGER)在胃食管反流病发病机制中的作用及其对非糜烂性反流病 (NERD)的诊断价值。方法　 95例患者根据内镜检查的结果分为反流性食管炎和NERD组 ,对其均进行 2 4h食管 pH和胆汁联合监测。 结果　反流性食管炎患者DGER的各项指标 :吸光度值 >0 14时间百分比 (% )、总反流次数和反流 >5min的次数分别为 19 0 5± 2 3 4 4、30 5 6±34 0 4和 5 90± 6 37,均显著高于NERD组相应的 7 2 6± 11 0 8、15 6 8± 2 0 92和 2 5 9± 3 5 7(P <0 0 5 ) ,而酸反流差异无显著性 ,随着反流性食管炎的程度加重DGER发生率增高 ;18 2 %的NERD患者存在单纯DGER ,联合胆汁监测可使NERD诊断阳性率由 6 5 9%升高到 84 1%。结论　DGER可以单独发生 ,在引起反流性食管黏膜损伤或症状方面都有作用 ,2 4h食管 pH和胆汁联合监测有助于NERD的诊断。     

不同亚型胃食管反流病食管黏膜下层炎症因子变化特点研究

目的分析3种亚型胃食管反流病患者与对照组食管黏膜的组织变化和局部IL-4、IL- 6表达,探讨Th2型炎症因子在胃食管反流病发生发展中的作用。 方法选取2016年12月至2017年12月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院69例患者临床资料,根据Gerd Q评分和内镜结果将所有入选研究者分为Barrett食管（BE）、糜烂性食管炎（EE）、非糜烂性反流病（NERD）和对照4组,利用食管24 h pH监测法评价胃食管反流病（GERD）患者食管酸暴露及反流特点;通过食管组织HE染色进行组织病理学评分,使用免疫组化法和酶联免疫吸附剂测定法检测食管局部及血清中IL-4、IL-6表达情况。 结果食管24 h pH监测结果中,3亚组间DeMeester指数、弱酸反流次数、反流总事件数比较,差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）,NERD组酸反流次数较其余2组低,差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05）;4组样本食管黏膜组织病理学评分中发现,BE组、EE组与其余2组相比均明显升高,差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05）,BE组与EE组评分之间亦有显著差异（P<0.05）,NERD组与对照组间差异不明显;IL-4在4组食管标本中均有不同程度表达,但4组间IL-4阳性率的比较并无显著差异（P均>0.05）;IL-6在NERD组和对照组表达量较低甚至不表达,EE组IL-6阳性率明显高于对照组（P<0.05 ）,但与NERD组间无显著差异,BE组阳性率与对照组和NERD组之间均有明显差异（P均<0.05 ）。 结论GERD食管黏膜上皮组织学炎症等级随食管炎的恶化而升高,其中NERD的食管组织学已出现炎性化趋势,但尚不足以与正常食管区别;IL-4在不同亚型GERD食管黏膜组织中的表达差异不及IL-6显著。     

Esophageal motility and gastric emptying in PSS patients, correlation with symptoms

Progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) commonly involves the esophagus. Dysphagia and heartburn are the most common esophageal symptoms. In this study we evaluated the relationship between esophageal symptoms and esophago-gastric motility. On esophageal manometry, loss of peristalsis, peristaltic contraction amplitude of distal esophagus less than 30 mmHg and decreased LES pressure were critical for esophageal symptoms. The degree of symptoms correlated to esophageal dysmotility. The gastric emptying in PSS patients was delayed, but there was no significant difference in gastric emptying between the patients with and without reflux esophagitis. Esophageal dysmotility is considered to be much responsible for the reflux esophagitis in PSS patients than gastric emptying.     

反流性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病患者酸暴露与食管压力监测结果分析

目的通过对胃食管反流病（GERD）患者的酸暴露情况、食管下括约肌（LES）压力、食管体部压力、幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染结果的比较，探讨反流性食管炎（RE）、非糜烂性反流病（NERD）的不同状况，为临床治疗提供科学依据。方法2001年10月至2005年7月，具有反流症状（烧心、反酸）的患者80例，胃镜检出RE31例，NERD45例，Barrett食管（BE）4例。行食管24hpH动态监测，并以De—Meester积分均值将GERD分为轻、中、重度，检测LES、食管体部即LES上方5cm、7cm、13cm（简记为L5、L7、L12）和食管上括约肌（UES）下方1cm、6cm、8cm（简记为U1、U6、U8）压力指标，并进行Hp感染的检查。结果RE、NERD两组患者食管24hpH酸暴露各指标的差异，无统计学意义（P〉0．05），De-Meester积分均值亦无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；轻、中、重度GERD患者食管24hpH监测指标具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。RE、NERD两组患者LES压力、食管体部的L5、L7、L12、U6和u8压力监测指标无统计学意义（P〉0．05），只有RE组U1压力低于NERD组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）；轻、中、重度GERD患者LES压力和食管体部的压力监测指标差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。RE和NERD组患者Hp感染率分别为16．1％和22．2％，其差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05），OR为1．309，95％C10．364～4．705。结论RE和NERD患者酸暴露、LES压力和食管体部压力等相应指标无明显差异；NERD在发病机制中，酸反流的强弱没有起到决定性作用。     

Acid and Non-Acid Reflux Patterns in Patients with Erosive Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD): A Study Using Intraluminal Impedance Monitoring

Background Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE) are the most common phenotypic presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Aim To assess acid and non-acid reflux patterns in patients with EE and NERD using combined esophageal pH-impedance monitoring. Methods A total of 26 GERD patients off acid-suppressive medication and ten healthy volunteers (HV) underwent upper endoscopy and 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. Analysis of the pH-impedance signals included total reflux time, number of reflux episodes according to gas–liquid composition, and pH (acid, non-acid). Results EE was identified in 13 patients and NERD in 13 patients. Pathologic acid reflux was found in 92.3 and 69.2% of patients with EE and NERD, respectively (P = 0.15). When compared to HV, EE patients and NERD patients showed a higher incidence of acid (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, EE vs. HV and NERD vs. HV, respectively) and non-acid reflux episodes (P = 0.03 and P = 0.001, EE vs. HV and NERD vs. HV, respectively). Mean reflux times, as assessed by both pH-metry and impedance monitoring, and incidence of acid and non-acid reflux episodes were similar in EE and NERD patients. In the supine position, however, EE patients showed a higher incidence of acid (P = 0.048) and liquid reflux episodes (P = 0.07). Conclusion Whereas EE patients have more acid reflux episodes in the supine position than NERD patients, patients with EE and NERD have similar non-acid reflux patterns. This observation lends support to the notion that non-acid reflux is less damaging to the esophageal mucosa than acid reflux.     

非糜烂性反流病患者食管动力特征分析

背景：食管动力障碍在胃食管反流病（GERD）的发生中起重要作用。目的：探讨不同类型非糜烂性反流病（NERD）的食管动力特征。方法：选取161例具有典型胃食管反流症状者和20名健康体检者,分别行上消化道内镜检查、24 h食管pH监测和食管测压。纳入内镜检查未见Barrett食管和食管黏膜破损、症状指数≥50%的NERD患者,根据其是否存在病理性酸反流分为异常酸反流组和食管酸高敏组,比较反流组（28例）、高敏组（13例）和对照组（15例）的食管测压结果。结果：反流组下食管括约肌（LES）长度较对照组显著缩短（P〈0.05）,LES压力显著降低（P〈0.05）,高敏组与对照组间则无明显差异。反流组和高敏组食管体部动力障碍均以食管远段为主,表现为收缩波幅降低、蠕动波传导速度减慢和非传导性收缩波比例增加,反流组改变更为明显。结论：不同类型NERD的食管动力特征存在差异。异常酸反流亚型NERD患者存在LES长度和压力异常,食管远段动力障碍更为明显。     

Role of Esophageal Function Tests in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinicians typically make the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from the clinical findings and then prescribe acid-suppressing drugs. Endoscopy is usually done for persistent or severe symptoms. Esophageal function tests (EFTs: esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring) are generally reserved for patients who have the most severe disease, including those being considered for surgery. We hypothesized that EFTs are more accurate than symptoms and endoscopy in the diagnosis of GERD. This was a retrospective study undertaken in a university tertiary care center. Between October 1989 and November 1998, 822 patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD (based on symptoms and endoscopic findings) were referred for EFTs. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the 24-hr pH monitoring score showed GERD (group A, GERD^–; group B, GERD⁺). The groups were compared with respect to the incidence and severity of symptoms, presence of a hiatal hernia on barium x-rays, presence and severity of esophagitis on endoscopy, and esophageal motility. In all, 247 patients (30%) had normal reflux scores (group A, GERD^–), and 575 patients (70%) had abnormal scores (Group B, GERD⁺). Eighty percent of group A and 88% of group B had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. The incidence of heartburn and regurgitation was similar in the two groups. Grade I–II esophagitis was diagnosed by endoscopy in 25% of group A and 35% of group B, and grade III esophagitis in 4% of group A and 11% of group B. Esophageal manometry showed that group B more often had esophageal dysmotility, consisting of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis. These data show that: (1) symptoms were unreliable for diagnosing GERD; (2) endoscopic evidence of grade I–II esophagitis was diagnostically nonspecific, and grade III was much less certain than claimed in other reports; and (3) pH monitoring identified patients with GERD and stratified them according to the severity of the disease. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are important in diagnosing GERD accurately. More liberal use of these tests early in patient management would avoid much improper and costly medical therapy and would help single out for special attention the patients with GERD who have the most severe disease.     

Role of duodenogastroesophageal reflux in the pathogenesis of esophageal mucosal injury and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) usually suffer from acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) simultaneously. The question of whether DGER has an important effect on the development of GERD remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of DGER in the pathogenesis of GERD and its value for the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). METHODS: GERD was initially diagnosed using the reflux disease questionnaire. For further diagnosis, results of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (excluding a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus) were considered in conjunction with simultaneous 24 h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. RESULTS: According to endoscopic findings, 95 patients (43 men, 50+/-10 years of age) were divided into two groups: the reflux esophagitis (RE) group (n=51) and the NERD group (n=44). Three DGER parameters, the percentage of time with absorbance greater than 0.14, the total number of reflux episodes and the number of bile reflux episodes lasting longer than 5 min, were evaluated in the study. For the RE group, the values of the DGER parameters (19.05%+/-23.44%, 30.56+/-34.04 and 5.90+/-6.37, respectively) were significantly higher than those of the NERD group (7.26%+/-11.08%, 15.68+/-20.92 and 2.59+/-3.57, respectively, P<0.05 for all) but no significant difference was found in acid reflux. Of NERD patients, 18.5% were diagnosed with simple DGER. The positive diagnosis rate of NERD could be significantly elevated from 65.9% to 84.1% (P<0.05), if bilirubin monitoring was employed in diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: DGER may occur independently but plays an important role in the development of RE and GERD symptoms. Simultaneous 24 h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring is superior to simple pH monitoring in helping identify patients at risk for NERD.     

Barrett食管、糜烂性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病食管酸暴露及食管动力学分析

目的分析胃食管反流病(GERD)三种亚型Barrett食管(BE)、糜烂性食管炎(EE)和非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者食管24 h pH监测与高分辨率食管测压结果,探讨不同亚型胃食管反流病食管酸暴露及动力学变化特点。 方法收集2015年12月至2017年12月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院接受住院治疗的90例GERD患者的临床资料,其中BE组28例、EE组35例、NERD组27例,通过食管24 h pH监测结果评价患食管酸暴露及反流特点,高分辨率食管测压检查评价食管动力学特点。 结果3组患者年龄及身体质量指数(BMI)等一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);EE组患者24 h食管pH监测中pH≤4(酸反流)、40.05);3组Demeester评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);LES长度3组无明显差异,BE组LES静息压及残余压较EE组和NERD组稍高,但差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);3组在食管远端收缩积分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论食管测酸检查在GERD临床亚型的鉴别方面并无显著差别;Barrett食管、糜烂性食管炎、非糜烂性反流病均存在抗反流屏障功能减退,但不同程度的食管粘膜损伤对食管动力学的影响并无差异。     

老年胃食管反流病患者高分辨率食管测压压力特点分析

目的探讨老年胃食管反流病患者高分辨率（HRM）测压压力特点。方法2011年6月至2012年9月对反酸、烧心伴胸骨后不适等症状的老年患者行HRM检测,分析其食管动力特点。结果老年反流性食管炎（RE）组的下食管括约肌（LES）总长度、腹腔内LES长度、LES平均静息压分别为（2．50±0．62）cm、（1．90±0．19）cm和（21．48±8．48）mmHg,低于老年非糜烂性反流病（NERD）组的（3．33±0．43）cm、（2．50±0．46）cm和（24．83±O．64）mmHg（P〈0．05）。结论老年RE患者存在明显的抗反流机制障碍,在其发病机制中可能发挥重要作用。而老年NERD患者的食管运动功能失调不明显,推测其他机制可能参与了其发病过程。     

伊托必利对食管运动障碍NERD患者症状及食管动力的影响

目的 研究伊托必利对伴有食管运动障碍的非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者症状及不同吞咽模式下食管运动功能的影响.方法 按标准选取具有典型胃食管反流症状及食管运动障碍的NERD患者34例,评估其胃食管反流症状,行不同物理性质食团(10次5 ml液体、10次胶体吞咽、10次2×2 ×2 cm固体吞咽)下高分辨率食管测压,给予伊...     

Esophageal epithelial surface in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease： An electron microscopic study

A/M： To investigate the intercellular spaces between the most superficially located esophageal epithelial cells in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD）.
METHODS： Eighteen patients with erosive esophagitis, 10 patients with non-erosive reflux disease （NERD）, and 18 normal asymptomatic volunteers were enrolled. Biopsy specimens were obtained from the lower esophageal mucosa without ulcer or erosion. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to investigate the tightness of the superficial cellular attachment.
RESULTS： The intercellular space between the most superficially located epithelial cells in patients with erosive esophagitis or NERD was not different from that in asymptomatic healthy individuals.
CONCLUSION： Widened luminal intercellular spaces of esophageal superficial epithelium are not responsible for the induction of reflux symptoms in patients with GERD.     

Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxations and Esophageal Body Muscular Contractile Response in Reflux Esophagitis

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are more frequently accompanied by acid reflux than in normals. The role of esophageal tone during gastroesophageal reflux events is unknown. We studied the tonic motor activity in the body of the esophagus during TLESRs with and without acid reflux in 11 patients with erosive esophagitis and compared the results with those previously obtained in healthy subjects. Esophageal peristaltic contractions were recorded 13, 8, and 3 cm above a sleeve that measured LES pressure. An intraluminal balloon was inflated 8 cm above the sleeve to induce an esophageal tonic contraction [artificial high pressure zone (HPZ)]. The percentage of TLESRs with acid reflux was significantly higher in patients with esophagitis than in healthy controls (58.3% vs 37.3%, P < 0.05). TLESRs per se were not associated with an inhibition or increase in esophageal body contractility, which, however, changed substantially immediately after reflux. In patients with esophagitis the esophageal body tonic contractility was inhibited in 59.5% of TLESRs vs 36% in controls (P < 0.05). Esophageal contractions during TLESRs traveled down the esophagus in 77% of the instances in patients vs 96.5% in controls (P < 0.05). In conclusion, gastroesophageal reflux during TLESRs was more frequently associated with inhibition of esophageal body tonic contractility in patients with esophagitis than in normals. The different response of the esophageal body to reflux observed in GERD patients may partially contribute to the higher prevalence of reflux during TLESRs in these patients.     

胃食管反流病患者酸反流与食管运动功能障碍的关系

背景：异常酸反流和食管运动功能障碍与胃食管反流病（GERD）密切相关。目的：研究GERD患者的食管运动和酸反流与食管黏膜损害的关系，以及两者之间的相关性。方法：选取有反酸、烧心、胸痛等典型胃食管反流症状的患者72例行上消化道内镜检查、食管测压和24hpH监测。根据pH〈4总时间百分比〈4．5％且DeMeester计分〈14．7的标准。将食管炎患者分为生理性酸反流组（pH^-组）和病理性酸反流组（pH^＋组）。结果：内镜下食管炎组24hpH监测各项指标较无食管炎组显著增高（P〈0．05），病理性酸反流的发生率显著高于无食管炎组（P〈0．01）。两组食管测压各项指标无显著差异，食管炎组pH^＋者的食管下括约肌压力（LESP）较pH^-者显著降低，食管体部蠕动波传导速度减慢，湿咽成功率减少（P〈0．05）。结论：GERD患者食管炎的发生与酸反流密切相关，有病理性酸反流的GERD患者易见食管运动功能障碍。     

Barrett食管、反流性食管炎和非糜烂性胃食管反流病的反流物特点

目的应用食管24 h pH-阻抗(MII-pH)等检查方法,分析具有胃食管反流病(GERD)典型症状、并且食管MII-pH检查结果异常的GERD患者,比较分析其各亚型,即Barrett食管(BE)、反流性食管炎(RE)和非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)患者的胃食管反流特点。 方法入选具有典型胃食管反流症状(烧心/反流),并且食管24 h MII-pH检查结果异常的GERD患者,根据内镜检查结果分为BE、RE、NERD三组,收集患者24 h的食管pH-阻抗信息,应用SPSS16.0统计软件进行组间Mann Whitney检验、多因素方差分析,P< 0.05认为具有统计学差异。 结果共入组103例具有典型反流症状且MII-pH监测阳性的GERD患者,其中有15例BE患者、32例RE患者、56例NERD患者。三组患者的平均年龄、性别构成、以及BMI无显著差异性。将三组患者的各项胃食管反流指标数值进行Mann-Whitney检验,显示RE、BE患者的DeMeester评分、pH<4反流时间百分比、长反流周期数显著高于NERD患者,具有显著性差异。BE患者的反流周期数显著多于RE和NERD患者,具有显著性差异。阻抗相关指标在三组患者之间均没有统计学差异。 结论与NERD相比,酸反流对于RE和BE具有更重要的致病意义。     

Esophageal motility in reflux disease before and after fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, clinical, and manometric study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine whether esophageal dysmotility affects symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease or clinical outcome after laparoscopic fundoplication and whether esophagus motor function changes postoperatively. METHODS: Two hundred patients with a history of long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease were investigated by clinical assessment, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring between May 1999 and May 2000. Patients were stratified according to presence or absence of esophageal dysmotility (each n = 100) and randomized to either 360 degrees (Nissen) or 270 degrees (Toupet) fundoplication. At a 4-month postoperative follow-up, preoperative tests were repeated. RESULTS: Preoperative esophageal dysmotility was associated with more severe reflux symptoms, more frequent resistance to medical treatment (64% vs. 49%; P < 0.05), and greater decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (9.5 +/- 5.3 vs. 12.4 +/- 6.7 mm Hg; P < 0.0005) compared with normal motility. Postoperatively, clinical outcome and reflux recurrence (21% vs. 14%) were similar. Esophageal motility remained unchanged in 85% of patients and changed from pathologic to normal in 20 (10 Nissen/10 Toupet) and vice versa in 9 (8 Nissen/1 Toupet) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal dysmotility (1) reflects more severe disease; (2) does not affect postoperative clinical outcome; (3) is not corrected by fundoplication, independent of the surgical procedure performed; (4) may occur as a result of fundoplication; and (5) requires no tailoring of surgical management.