Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with trans-duodenoscope cyclic irrigation technique for walled-off pancreatic necrosis

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage has been established as a good treatment modality in the management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis, but the unmanageable infection of postoperation is still a thorny problem due to the poor drainage ability for solid necrotic debris only through transmural stent and nasocystic catheter.AimsIntroduce a novel therapeutic method, namely endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation technique in managing patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis.Methods18 patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated with walled-off pancreatic necrosis received treatment with endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation were involved in this retrospective study.Results17 of 18 patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis were treated by this new therapeutic method. Subsequent surgery was performed in 1 case due to uncontrolled infection, complications such as perforation, bleeding or multiple organ failure were not observed. Treatment success rate was high (16 in 17, 94.12%).ConclusionEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation is an effective treatment option for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis to facilitate drainage and obviate the need for subsequent surgery or endoscopic necrosectomy.     

Endoscopic transluminal pancreatic necrosectomy using a self-expanding metal stent and high-flow water-jet system

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis and a pancreatic abscess are the most severe complications of acute pancreatitis. Surgery in such critically ill patients is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality within the first few weeks after the onset of symptoms. Minimal invasive approaches with high success and low mortality rates are therefore of considerable interest. Endoscopic therapy has the potential to offer safe and effective alternative treatment. We report here on 3 consecutive patients with infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis and 1 patient with a pancreatic abscess who underwent direct endoscopic necrosectomy 19-21 d after the onset of acute pancreatitis. The infected pancreatic necrosis or abscess was punctured transluminally with a cystostome and, after balloon dilatation, a non-covered self-expanding biliary metal stent was placed into the necrotic cavity. Following stent deployment, a nasobiliary pigtail catheter was placed into the cavity to ensure continuous irrigation. After 5-7 d, the metal stent was removed endoscopically and the necrotic cavity was entered with a therapeutic gastroscope. Endoscopic debridement was performed via the simultaneous application of a high-flow water-jet system; using a flush knife, a Dormia basket, and hot biopsy forceps. The transluminal endotherapy was repeated 2-5 times daily during the next 10 d. Supportive care included parenteral antibiotics and jejunal feeding. All patients improved dramatically and with resolution of their septic conditions; 3 patients were completely cured without any further complications or the need for surgery. One patient died from a complication of prolonged ventilation severe bilateral pneumonia, not related to the endoscopic procedure. No procedure related complications were observed. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy with temporary application of a self-expanding metal stent and a high-flow water-jet system shows promise for enhancing the potential of this endoscopic approach in patients with walled-off pancreatic ne     

CXC receptor 1 is overexpressed in endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease

Abstract

Objective. Transmural endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy have become favored treatment modes for infected pancreatic pseudocysts and necroses. In this analysis, we summarize the outcome of 40 patients with complicated course of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic treatment. Material and methods. From January 2006 through May 2011, 40 patients of our department with complicated pancreatitis were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients underwent endosonographic transgastric puncture followed by wire-guided insertion of one or more double pigtail stents. Patients with extensive necroses were treated repeatedly with transgastric necrosectomy. Treatment success was determined by clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters. Results. Nine patients had interstitial pancreatitis (IP) with pancreatic pseudocysts. Thirty-one patients had necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) with acute pancreatic necroses (n = 4) or walled-off pancreatic necrosis (n = 27). All patients with IP and nine patients with NP had pseudocysts without solid material and underwent transgastric drainage only. In this group major complications occurred in 11.1% and no mortality was observed. Twenty-two NP patients were treated with additional repeated necrosectomy. In patients with localized peripancreatic necroses (n = 10) no need of surgery or mortality was observed, major complications occurred in 10%. In patients with extensive necroses reaching the lower abdomen (n = 12), three needed subsequent surgery and three died. Conclusions. Transgastric endoscopy is an effective minimally invasive procedure even in patients with advanced pancreatic necroses. Complication rate is low particularly in patients with sole pseudocysts or localized necroses. The extent of the fluid collections and necroses is a new predictive parameter for the outcome of the patients.     

Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature

Pancreatic fluid collections(PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis. It is important to classify PFCs to guide management. The revised Atlanta criteria classifies PFCs as acute or chronic, with chronic fluid collections subdivided into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis(WOPN). Establishing adequate nutritional support is an essential step in the management of PFCs. Early attempts at oral feeding can be trialed in patients with mild pancreatitis. Enteral feeding should be implemented in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis. Jejunal feeding remains the preferred route of enteral nutrition. Symptomatic PFCs require drainage; options include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, and an associated reduction in health care costs, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has become the preferable approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach using a seldinger technique is the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WOPN. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WOPN. Lumen apposing metal stents that allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen are preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography with pancreatic duct(PD) exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Any pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.     

New fully-covered self-expandable metal stent for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention in infectious walled-off pancreatic necrosis (with video)

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage using a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) has been reported for satisfactory drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy. Here, we described an interesting case in which successful endoscopic therapy was performed using a new SEMS in infectious walled-off pancreatic necrosis.     

Is necrosectomy obsolete for infected necrotizing pancreatitis? Is a paradigm shift needed?

In 1886,Senn stated that removing necrotic pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue would benefit patients with severe acute pancreatitis.Since then,necrosectomy has been a mainstay of surgical procedures for infected necrotizing pancreatitis(NP).No published report has successfully questioned the role of necrosectomy.Recently,however,increasing evidence shows good outcomes when treating walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis without a necrosectomy.The literature concerning NP published primarily after 2000 was reviewed;it demonstrates the feasibility of a paradigm shift.The majority(75%)of minimally invasive necrosectomies show higher completion rates:between 80%and 100%.Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy has shown remarkable results when combined with percutaneous drainage or a metallic stent.Related morbidities range from 40%to 92%.Single-digit mortality rates have been achieved with transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy,but not with video-assisted retroperitoneal necrosectomy series.Drainage procedures without necrosectomy have evolved from percutaneous drainage to transluminal endoscopic drainage with or without percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy access for laparoscopic instruments.Most series have reached higher success rates of 79%-93%,and even 100%,using transcystic multiple drainage methods.It is becoming evident that transluminal endoscopic drainage treatment of walledoff NP without a necrosectomy is feasible.With further refinement of the drainage procedures,a paradigm shift from necrosectomy to drainage is inevitable.     

Endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis – Single center experience of 112 cases

BackgroundEndoscopic drainage of the pancreatic pseudocysts has been accepted as a valid alternative to surgical and percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic treatment of the symptomatic walled-off necrosis was not, however, univocally accepted by all authors.The aimThe aim of this study was to assessed the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis.Methods and materialBetween 2001 and 2011 one hundred and twelve patients with symptomatic walled-off necrosis were treated in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of the Medical University of Gdansk, using endoscopic drainage. The drainage system was set up by introducing endoprostheses and drains through gastric and duodenal fistulas, transpapillary, and additionally – in cases when the necrosis was spreading outside of the lesser sac – percutaneously. The results and complications of the endoscopic treatment were assessed retrospectively.ResultsInitial success was achieved in 104/112 (92.9%) patients. Long term success was achieved in 94/112 (83.9%) patients in intention to treat analysis and 94/102 (90.4%) patients in per protocol analysis. Recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection was observed in 19/97(19.6%) patients. Procedure-related complications were observed in 29/112 patients (25.9%). Most of them were treated conservatively. Procedure-related mortality was 1.8%.ConclusionsIn a large group of selected patients with symptomatic walled-off necrosis, endoscopic drainage enables high success rate with acceptable complication rate and low procedure-related mortality.     

Endoscopic drainage for management of infected necrosis following EUS-TA in a patient with pancreatic cancer: A case report

Rationale:Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has become the norm for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. EUS-TA is relatively safe, but various complications can occur. Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a rare but serious complication. The latest guidelines suggest that all invasive interventions in patients with IPN should be delayed until walled-off necrosis appears.Patient concerns:A 73-year-old man was referred to our hospital with double primary cancers including gallbladder and pancreas. We performed EUS-TA on metastatic pancreatic tail cancer to confirm histologic diagnosis. Six days after the procedure, he developed abdominal pain and fever.Diagnoses:The patient''s laboratory findings showed leukocytosis and C-reactive protein elevation. Fluid collection around pancreas tail and stomach was detected in computed tomography (CT) scan, and the patient was diagnosed with IPN.Interventions and outcomes:EUS-guided endoscopic transmural drainage (EUS-TD) was performed for the treatment of IPN. Two days after the procedure with antibiotics, his CRP level decreased abruptly, and he received chemotherapy for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) 5 days after the procedure. He was discharged from our hospital without complications 15 days after chemotherapy.Lessons:In selected patients with PDAC, early endoscopic drainage may be recommended as treatment for IPN resulting from complications of EUS-TA.     

NOTES and endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy for the GI endoscopist

Endoscopists seek to conduct more aggressive surgical procedures that surpass the limitations of existing endoscopic procedures. Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) are typical examples of this new trend; both are performed through the gastrointestinal wall without a skin incision. Endoscopic necrosectomy is effective for managing organized pancreatic necrosis and abscesses. The necrotic tissues are removed endoscopically by directly entering the cavity of the organized pancreatic necrosis. NOTES is a possible advance over surgical intervention, as it is a less invasive, more cosmetic, and effective procedure. There are various approaches, including the esophagus, stomach, colon, and vagina; Various procedures are possible using NOTES, such as cholecystectomy, appendectomy, full-thickness stomach resection, splenectomy, gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis, and peritoneoscopy. The requirements for NOTES include high proficiency in endoscopic techniques, including knowledge of various devices, anatomy, and surgical procedures. Since most GI endoscopists have no surgical background, to increase the usage of NOTES, GI endoscopists should form and lead teams that include various specialists. We believe that endoscopic necrosectomy and NOTES represent a major shift in the treatment paradigm because physicians can treat beyond the gastrointestinal wall and endoscopic procedures will replace surgical treatment.     

Endoscopic fibrin glue injection for closure of pancreatocutaneous fistula following transgastric endoscopic necrosectomy

Transgastric endoscopic necrosectomy has been recently introduced as the effective and alternative management of infected pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess. However, up to 40% of patients who undergo endoscopic necrosectomy may need an additional percutaneous approach for subsequent peripancreatic fluid collection or non-resolution of pancreatic necrosis. This percutaneous approach may lead to persistent pancreatocutaneous fistula, which remains a serious problem and usually requires prolonged hospitalization, or even open-abdominal surgery. We describe the first case of pancreatocutaneous fistula and concomitant abdominal wall defect following transgastric endoscopic necrosectomy and percutaneous drainage, which were endoscopically closed with fibrin glue injection via the necrotic cavity.     

Spectrum of microorganisms in infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis – Impact on organ failure and mortality

ObjectiveData on the microbial spectrum in infected pancreatic necrosis are scarce. Only few studies have addressed this issue in a larger, consecutive group of patients treated by a standardized algorithm. Since 2005 endoscopic, transmural drainage and necrosectomy (ETDN) has been the treatment of choice for walled-off necrosis in our centre. The present study evaluated the microbial spectrum of infected pancreatic necrosis and the possible relationship between infected necrosis, organ failure, and mortality. Furthermore, we investigated whether the aetiology of pancreatitis, use of external drainage, and antibiotic treatment influenced the microbial findings.MethodsRetrospective review of medical charts on 78 patients who underwent ETDN in our tertiary referral centre between November 2005 and November 2011.ResultsTwenty-four patients (31%) developed one or more organ failures, 23 (29%) needed treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 9 (11%) died during hospital admission. The prevailing microbial findings at the index endoscopy were enterococci (45%), enterobacteriaceae (42%), and fungi (22%). There was a significant association between the development of organ failure (p < 0.001), need of treatment in ICU (p < 0.002), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.039) and infected necrosis at the time of index endoscopy. Enterococci (p < 0.0001) and fungi (p = 0.01) were found more frequently in patients who died during admission as compared to survivors.ConclusionDifferent microbes in pancreatic necrosis may influence the prognosis. We believe that a detailed knowledge on the microbial spectrum in necrotizing pancreatitis may be utilized in the treatment to improve the outcome.     

A standardized method for endoscopic necrosectomy improves complication and mortality rates

ObjectivesEndoscopic necrosectomy is effective in the treatment of walled-off necrosis (WON), and is preferred to surgical approaches, however complication and mortality rates remain high with few centers regularly employing the technique. Lack of a standardized approach may also contribute to these limitations.MethodsPrior to the study, a multidisciplinary team applied standardized care assessment and management plan principles to develop and optimize a systematic approach for the management of WON. Preoperative, postoperative, and endoscopic management were standardized. Patient preparation, room set-up, technical features (EUS-guidance, cold-access with balloon dilation, fragmentation of necrosis on the initial procedure, antibiotic lavage, double pigtail stents), and discontinuation of PPIs to encourage auto-digestion of necrosis were included. This study employed a consecutive prospective clinical registry to assess the clinical outcomes of this standardized approach.Results60 consecutive patients underwent 1.58 ± 0.1 necrosectomies, with debridement accomplished on the initial procedure in 98.3%. 39 patients (65%) required only one session. Clinical resolution occurred in 86.7%, with radiologic confirmation. Percutaneous drainage was required in 8 patients during follow-up, and 4 of these later required surgery. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.3% of patients, and there was no mortality.ConclusionsThe standardized technique employed in this series was associated with lower rates of adverse events, morbidity, and mortality than prior large series. Use of a systematic approach, and integrating elements of this method may improve the risk profile of endoscopic necrosectomy and allow broader adoption.     

Flexible percutaneous endoscopic retroperitoneal necrosectomy as rescue therapy for pancreatic necroses beyond the reach of endoscopic ultrasonography: A case series

Minimally invasive or endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy are the standard of care for infected pancreatic fluid collections and necroses after pancreatitis. In an endoscopic treatment algorithm, necroses beyond the reach of safe endoscopic access are typically treated by percutaneous drainage. We aimed to evaluate percutaneous minimally invasive necrosectomy using a purely endoscopic technique in patients with extensive necrosis. In patients with necroses beyond safe transluminal reach, the percutaneous drainage canal was used for flexible endoscopic access and dilatation of the tract to 20 mm. Percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy was carried out through this canal. We present a case series of 14 patients in whom between one and four necrosectomy (median two) sessions were done to remove solid necroses successfully in 13 out of 14 patients. There were no major complications apart from one patient with abdominal compartment syndrome secondary to delayed erosion of the splenic artery. Percutaneous flexible necrosectomy might evolve into an alternative to surgical minimally invasive necrosectomy in anatomical sites beyond transluminal endoscopic reach.     

Endoscopic necrosectomy of organized pancreatic necrosis: a currently practiced NOTES procedure

Background

Endoscopic necrosectomy is now an established minimally invasive method for treatment of organized pancreatic necrosis.

Methods

Review of methods and results of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrosis.

Results

Reports by multiple groups have demonstrated favorable results of endoscopic necrosectomy. The mortality of critically ill patients undergoing endoscopic treatment in several series is approximately 10%. Some patients will eventually also require surgery for situations such as complete pancreatic duct disruption, but even in these cases endoscopic necrosectomy is useful because pancreatic surgery can often be delayed until the patient is stable.

Conclusions

Endoscopic necrosectomy will likely assume an increasing role in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis. This should result in reduced morbidity and mortality in these critically ill patients.     

Endoscopic management of complications of acute pancreatitis: an update on the field

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis is a frequent, nonmalignant gastrointestinal disorder leading to hospital admission. For its severe form and subsequent complications, minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures are being used increasingly, and are subject to rapid technical advances.

Areas covered: Based on a systematic literature search in PubMed, medline, and Web-of-Science, we discuss the currently available treatment strategies for endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts, walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), and disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS), and compare the efficacy and safety of plastic and metal stents. A special focus is placed on studies directly comparing different stent types, including lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and clinical outcomes when draining pseudocysts or WONs. The clinical significance and endoscopic treatment options for DPDS are also discussed.

Expert commentary: Endoscopic therapy has become the treatment of choice for different types of pancreatic and peripancreatic collections, the majority of which, however, require no intervention. The use of LAMS has facilitated drainage and necrosectomy in patients with WON or pseudocysts. Serious complications remain a problem in spite of high technical and clinical success rates. DPDS is an increasingly recognized problem in the presence of pseudocysts or WONs but evidence for endoscopic stent placement in this situation remains insufficient.     

Combined endoscopic trangastric drainage and video assisted retroperitoneal pancreatic debridement – The best of both worlds for extensive pancreatic necrosis with enteric fistulae

Enteric fistula is a serious complication of necrotizing pancreatitis. Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy can significantly reduce the incidence of enterocutaneous fistula after pancreatic debridement. However, endoscopic necrosectomy may not be well-suited to debridement of necrosis that tracks laterally to the paracolic gutters, which is often more efficiently addressed by video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD). We report the combined use of endoscopic transgastric drainage and VARD for treatment of a 76 year old man with severe necrotizing acute pancreatitis complicated by infected, walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Computed tomography showed laterally tracking pancreatic necrosis and flouroscopic drain injection after percutaneous drainage demonstrated with fistulas to the stomach, duodenum, and colon. The infection and fistulas resolved completely. This approach combined the major advantage of VARD with the major advantage of endoscopic transluminal drainage. We are not aware of any reports of combining these techniques and believe the combination offers a minimally invasive approach for patients with extensive necrosis and a high likelihood of enteric or pancreatic fistulas.     

JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis:surgical management

Acute pancreatitis represents a spectrum of disease ranging from a mild, self-limited course to a rapidly progressive, severe illness. The mortality rate of severe acute pancreatitis exceeds 20%, and some patients diagnosed as mild to moderate acute pancreatitis at the onset of the disease may progress to a severe, life-threatening illness within 2–3 days. The Japanese (JPN) guidelines were designed to provide recommendations regarding the management of acute pancreatitis in patients having a diversity of clinical characteristics. This article sets forth the JPN guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis, excluding gallstone pancreatitis, by incorporating the latest evidence for the surgical management of severe pancreatitis in the Japanese-language version of the evidence-based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis published in 2003. Ten guidelines are proposed: (1) computed tomography-guided or ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for bacteriology should be performed in patients suspected of having infected pancreatic necrosis; (2) infected pancreatic necrosis accompanied by signs of sepsis is an indication for surgical intervention; (3) patients with sterile pancreatic necrosis should be managed conservatively, and surgical intervention should be performed only in selected cases, such as those with persistent organ complications or severe clinical deterioration despite maximum intensive care; (4) early surgical intervention is not recommended for necrotizing pancreatitis; (5) necrosectomy is recommended as the surgical procedure for infected pancreatic necrosis; (6) simple drainage should be avoided after necrosectomy, and either continuous closed lavage or open drainage should be performed; (7) surgical or percutaneous drainage should be performed for pancreatic abscess; (8) pancreatic abscesses for which clinical findings are not improved by percutaneous drainage should be subjected to surgical drainage immediately; (9) pancreatic pseudocysts that produce symptoms and complications or the diameter of which increases should be drained percutaneously or endoscopically; and (10) pancreatic pseudocysts that do not tend to improve in response to percutaneous drainage or endoscopic drainage should be managed surgically.     

Closed lesser sac lavage in the management of pancreatic necrosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surgery for pancreatic necrosis complicating acute severe pancreatitis carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the efficacy of necrosectomy and closed lesser sac lavage as a method of management of pancreatic necrosis. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with pancreatic necrosis who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy consecutively in a tertiary care referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The technique of necrosectomy and postoperative lavage is described in detail. Details regarding the patient profile, disease severity, surgical details, postoperative morbidity, repeat interventions and the mortality are presented. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients, irrigation was able to be started in 48. Lavage was able to be continued until disease resolution or death in all but 10 patients. Post-operative locoregional complications were residual abscesses in 10, bleeding in eight, enteric fistulae in 12 and pancreatic fistulae in nine. Six patients needed postoperative percutaneous procedures, while 16 patients needed repeat surgery. Seventeen patients died (29%), all of whom had multiple organ failure involving more than two organs, while 11 developed sepsis. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic necrosectomy and postoperative closed lesser sac lavage is an effective method of managing these patients, with acceptable morbidity, re-operation rates and mortality.     

Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts and necrosis

Over the last several years, there have been refinements in the understanding and nomenclature regarding the natural history of acute pancreatitis. Patients with acute pancreatitis frequently develop acute pancreatic collections that, over time, may evolve into pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis. Endoscopic management of these local complications of acute pancreatitis continues to evolve. Treatment strategies range from simple drainage of liquefied contents to repeated direct endoscopic necrosectomy of a complex necrotic collection. In patients with chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocysts may arise as a consequence of pancreatic ductal obstruction that then leads to pancreatic ductal disruption. In this review, we focus on the indications, techniques and outcomes for endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis.     

Large area of walled‐off pancreatic necrosis successfully treated by endoscopic necrosectomy using a grasping‐type scissors forceps

Endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) for walled‐off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is less invasive than surgical treatment and has become the first choice for pancreatic abscess. EN is usually carried out with several devices including snares, baskets, and grasping forceps. Occasionally, we have encountered cases in which EN has not been satisfactorily carried out, and there is pressure for further innovation in EN. Here, we describe a case of a large area of WOPN that was successfully treated by EN with endoscopic submucosal dissection and associated techniques, which facilitated removal of necrotic tissues. A 60‐year‐old man was referred to our hospital for WOPN as a complication of necrotizing pancreatitis. As a result of his complicating conditions including ischemic heart disease, uncontrollable arrhythmia, chronic renalfailure, and persistent pleural effusion, he was deemed a poor surgical candidate. Although EN with conventional devices was carried out for five sessions, we could not remove the dense and massive necrotic tissues. At the sixth EN session, the Clutch Cutter device (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) was used to remove the necrotic tissues, without major complications. This is believed to be the first report of EN using the Clutch Cutter for successful treatment of WOPN.