The suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion during lactation in the rat

The inhibition of LH secretion during lactation may be the consequence of a pituitary insensitivity to GnRH stimulation and/or an inhibition of GnRH release from the hypothalamus. To assess the contribution that these mechanisms may make to the suppression of LH secretion during lactation, we described the pattern of LH secretion in lactating rats and the magnitude of LH secretion in response to a GnRH stimulus. We assessed the effect of the strength of the suckling stimulus (two and eight pups), the length of lactation (5 and 10 days), and the presence of the ovaries on the pattern of LH secretion. We also examined the pattern of LH secretion after removal of a large suckling stimulus. In the intact rat, the pattern of LH secretion during lactation was uniformly nonpulsatile, despite significant differences between animals suckling two and eight pups in pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. In intact rats suckling two pups during day 10 of lactation, significant LH secretion was stimulated by 0.4-ng pulses of GnRH every 50 min, while animals with eight pups secreted little LH in response to the same stimulus. It was concluded that a two-pup suckling stimulus was sufficient to completely suppress pulsatile GnRH release without affecting pituitary function, whereas an eight-pup suckling stimulus also depressed pituitary sensitivity to GnRH. In ovariectomized (ovx) rats suckling two pups, seven of nine animals showed no postcastration rise in LH secretion or evidence of pulsatile LH secretion during day 5 of lactation. In the remaining two animals, a castrate pattern of pulsatile LH secretion was observed, with a LH interpulse interval of 31 +/- 6 min. By day 10 of lactation, all animals suckling two pups had castration patterns of LH secretion, with a LH interpulse interval of 35 +/- 2 min, which was significantly different from the LH interpulse interval of 26 +/- 1 min observed in ovx animals without pups. Therefore, a two-pup suckling stimulus is capable of retarding the increase in LH pulse frequency characteristically seen in the rat after castration. In ovx rats suckling eight pups, the postcastration rise in LH secretion was completely inhibited in all animals examined on days 5 and 10 of lactation, and the pattern of LH secretion was uniformly nonpulsatile. A consistent pattern of pulsatile LH secretion was not reinitiated until 72 h after removal of the suckling stimulus (LH interpulse interval, 31 +/- 2 min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effects of progesterone on pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and LH subunit messenger ribonucleic acid during lactation in the rat

In ovarian-intact lactating rats, removal of the suckling stimulus leads to restoration of pituitary LH beta mRNA levels and pulsatile LH secretion after 72 h, which correlates with a sharp decrease in plasma progesterone concentrations to basal levels. In contrast, in ovariectomized lactating rats, the increase in pituitary LH function is observed by 24 h after pup removal. To determine if progesterone secretion from the ovary participates in the delayed recovery of LH secretion, we treated lactating rats with the progesterone antagonist RU 486 and determined the effects on the time course of recovery of pulsatile LH secretion and LH subunit mRNA after pup removal and on pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. In ovarian-intact lactating rats treated with RU 486, pulsatile LH secretion was observed in about 40% of the rats within 24 h after pup removal (LH interpulse interval, 43.7 +/- 8.3 min) and in about 90% of the rats within 48 h after pup removal (LH interpulse interval, 46.1 +/- 3.6 min). The mean plasma LH level in the RU 486-treated rats was 10.1 +/- 2.2 ng/ml 24 h after removal of pups (control, less than 5 ng/ml) and had increased to 35.1 +/- 6.4 ng/ml 48 h after pup removal (control, 9.1 +/- 2.5 ng/ml). However, RU 486 treatment had no significant effect on LH mRNA subunit levels. To determine whether progesterone acts at the pituitary to block GnRH stimulation of LH secretion, we tested the effects of RU 486 on LH secretion in response to 2- and 5-ng pulses of GnRH. Pituitary responsiveness was tested 24 h after pup removal. We found that both doses of GnRH were effective in stimulating pulsatile LH secretion, and treatment with RU 486 had no significant effect on this response. We conclude from these studies that progesterone secretion from the ovary contributes to the inhibition of LH secretion that occurs after pup removal, since antagonizing progesterone's action resulted in an earlier restoration of pulsatile LH secretion. The increase in LH secretion occurred in the absence of any significant changes in responsiveness of the pituitary to GnRH stimulation or in LH subunit mRNA levels. Therefore, the primary site of action of progesterone would appear to be at the hypothalamus to suppress pulsatile GnRH secretion.     

Neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating growth hormone and prolactin secretion during lactation

The maternal plasma concentrations of GH and PRL increase dramatically upon the initiation of lactation in the rat. In light of the fact that these two hormones have evolved from one common precursor, we sought to determine if the neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating their concomitant increase during lactation are common or if they are functionally distinct. To evaluate this, lactating rats were passively immunized with antiserum raised against GHRH and then monitored for changes in GH and PRL secretion in response to suckling. On day 9 or 10 postpartum, pups were removed from their mothers at 0800 h. At 1100 h mothers were injected with normal rabbit serum (NRS) or GHRH antiserum (GHRH-ab). At 1400 h a control blood sample was drawn. Pups were then returned to their mothers, with subsequent blood samples drawn over the next 60 min. Plasma concentrations of GH significantly increased to 12.3 +/- 1.0 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM) in NRS-treated females after the return of the pups. In contrast, there was no change in GH concentrations in the females treated with the GHRH-ab. Plasma PRL concentrations rose approximately 200 ng/ml in both the NRS-treated animals and the GHRH-ab-treated ones. Body weight gains of the pups during the 60-min period of lactation were similar in both groups. These results suggest that the neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating the increases in GH and PRL during lactation are distinct and that GHRH is the hypothalamic factor responsible for the increase in GH. Furthermore, these results suggest that acutely interrupting the increase in GH secretion that occurs during lactation does not compromise nursing behavior and performance.     

Cyclic and diurnal alterations in the response of luteinizing hormone and prolactin to prostaglandin E2 during the rat oestrous cycle

Two micrograms of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was infused into a lateral ventricle of the brain of female rats at 09.00 or 13.00 h on the different days of the oestrous cycle and the effect on luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (Prl) release was determined. At 09.00 h PGE2 caused a pronounced release of LH in pro-oestrous, oestrous and metoestrous rats whereas the LH response in dioestrous rats was moderate. The secretion of Prl was only stimulated in rats from the pro-oestrous phase. When infused at 13.00 h PGE2 had a marked stimulatory effect on the release of LH in all groups of rats. The response was almost the same in oestrous, metoestrous and dioestrous rats but pro-oestrous rats a 2-fold higher LH response was observed. On each day of the oestrous cycle it was found that the LH-releasing activity of PGE2 was greater at 13.00 h than at 09.00 h. Thus, the overall greatest responsiveness of LH to PGE2 was noted at 13.00 h on pro-oestrus i.e. at a time which was prior to the onset of the spontaneous LH surge. At 13.00 h - as at 09.00 h - PGE2 was only capable of stimulating Prl release in pro-oestrous rats. Resembling the LH response it was found that PGE2-induced Prl release was greater at 13.00 h than at 09.00 h. In adult male rats the stimulatory effect of PGE2 on LH and Prl release was independent of the time of administration. It is concluded that the neuroendocrine elements of the hypothalamo-pituitary unit in mature female rats exhibit cyclic as well as diurnal alterations in the responsiveness to PGE2.     

Sexual differences in the serotonergic control of prolactin and luteinizing hormone secretion in the rat

The effects of serotonin on PRL and LH release were investigated in female and male rats under different experimental conditions. At a dose of 5 mg/kg ip, serotonin increased serum PRL titers in intact males and in females during diestrus and estrus; the levels attained in the male rats were much higher than in the females. At a lower dose (2.5 mg/kg) the PRL-releasing effect of serotonin was only evident in male rats. Thus, we chose this dose for the following experiments to investigate the apparent sexual difference. To evaluate the importance of the hormonal status characteristic of male and female in conditioning the serotonin effect, an experiment was performed in gonadectomized rats, untreated or treated with estradiol benzoate (EB), or testosterone propionate (TP). In the three hormonal conditions the sexual difference was maintained: serotonin released PRL in males and failed to do so in females. However, if males were castrated within 24 h of birth, and females androgenized by a single perinatal injection of TP, the sexual difference in adulthood were reversed; thus, androgenized females responded to serotonin and males castrated at birth failed to do so. These results suggest that a male differentiated brain is more sensitive to the PRL-releasing effect of serotonin, irrespective of the hormonal environment of the rat. On the other hand, serotonin increased serum LH in female rats in estrus and in adult ovariectomized rats treated with EB; but not in females in diestrus or in ovariectomized rats, treated with TP or untreated. Neither did it modify serum LH titers in male rats whether intact, orchidectomized, or orchidectomized plus steroids. However, if male rats were castrated a few hours after birth and then treated in adulthood with EB, serotonin effectively released LH. Thus, two components, estradiol and a feminine differentiated brain, may be necessary for the facilitatory action of serotonin on LH release. Since no sex differences were observed in the increase of serum serotonin after the injection of 2.5 mg/kg of the drug, it can be discounted that the differences described for the endocrine effect of the drug could be due to different levels of circulating indolamine achieved in male and female rats. Taken together, our results indicate that serotonergic control of anterior pituitary secretion is sexually differentiated and that it presents individual characteristics for PRL and LH release.     

Seasonal changes in prolactin and luteinizing hormone in the polyandrous spotted sandpiper, Actitis macularia

The polyandrous spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia) is a species characterized by female dominance over males and predominant male parental care. Prolactin (Prl) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were analyzed in plasma samples obtained serially from individuals across different stages of the breeding season. The reproductive status of each sampled individual was known in detail. Similar Prl values were obtained independently by two different assays. Males tended to have higher plasma Prl levels than females throughout the breeding season. Prl was significantly elevated in both sexes by the first few days of incubation. This rapid rise in Prl may indicate its role in brood patch development and the onset of incubation behavior. In males Prl continued to rise during incubation, whereas it remained constant in females. Higher levels of Prl in males than females, especially late in incubation, reflects the greater contribution of males to incubation. LH declined markedly in males and females from prelaying to early incubation. There was a significant negative correlation between Prl and LH among males, especially from the prelaying to early incubation phases of the season. There was no such correlation among females.     

Pulsatile luteinizing hormone release during pregnancy in the rat

The present studies were designed to characterize LH release during pregnancy in the rat. Unanesthetized animals with jugular cannulae were bled for 3 h between 1000-1300 h on days 6-8, 14-16 or 22 of gestation (50 microliters whole blood/5 min). Plasma estradiol and progesterone values both increased from days 6-8 to days 14-16. However, while plasma estradiol levels increased further between days 14-16 and day 22, plasma P levels had declined 86%. The percent coefficients of variation obtained for alterations in blood LH levels at each stage of pregnancy were all significantly greater than intraassay variation, indicating that LH release was pulsatile at each stage. Although there were no significant differences in mean blood LH levels, pulse amplitude, or frequency between days 6-8 and 14-16, the individual patterns of LH release clearly varied between these 2 groups, and most notably within the 14-16 day group. Fifty-three percent (9 of 17) of the LH records in rats on days 14-16 were nonpulsatile compared to only 20% (3 of 15) on days 6-8. However, despite a trend toward an absence of pulsatile LH release on days 14-16, mean frequency at this time did not differ from days 6-8, since on days 14-16 the remaining 8 animals demonstrated 3.5 pulses/3 h, while on days 6-8 the other 12 rats averaged only 2.5 pulses/3 h. On day 22, there was a marked increase in mean blood LH levels compared with either days 6-8 or 14-16. This increase was due to an increase in mean LH pulse frequency. All 15 rats demonstrated pulsatile LH secretion, a significantly greater incidence of pulsatile LH release than on days 14-16 (100% vs. 47%). These data demonstrate that LH release is pulsatile during pregnancy in the rat, and changes in the characteristics of this secretion occur at different stages of gestation.     

Nocturnal prolactin pulses in relation to luteinizing hormone and thyrotropin.

The two hypothalamic releasing factors, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH), have been shown to stimulate pituitary prolactin (PRL) release as well as their respective pituitary hormones, luteinizing hormone (LH) and thyrotropin (TSH). In this study the influence of LH and TSH regulatory mechanisms on nocturnal PRL secretion was investigated by evaluating whether the coincidence of PRL with LH and TSH pulses occurred more frequently than would be expected if the hormone generators were not coupled. Thirty night studies were conducted in twelve healthy male subjects. Six subjects underwent 3 studies and 6 subjects 2 studies. Blood was collected into aliquots at 10 min intervals throughout the night and plasma concentrations of PRL, TSH, and LH were determined. From the plasma profiles, hormone secretory rates were calculated using a method of deconvolution. Significant plasma and secretory hormone pulses were identified by a peak detection computer program. For statistical analysis the night studies of each subject were concatenated. Concomitance between the plasma pulses of both TSH and LH with PRL was insufficient to reject the null hypothesis of random coincidence. An increase in the number of subjects demonstrating significant coincidence between the hormone pulses was obtained when secretory pulses were analysed. Seven of the 12 and 10 of the 12 subjects showed significant concomitance between PRL and respectively TSH and LH. This proportion was sufficient to confirm copulsatility between PRL and LH. These results suggest that LH regulatory mechanisms are involved in the generation of the nocturnal pulsatile PRL profile, TRH may also play a role in the secretion of PRL at a central level, but was not reflected in the plasma or secretory profiles because of other overriding regulatory factors.     

Physiological role of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in modulating the secretion of prolactin and luteinizing hormone in the female rat.

Long-term ovariectomized (OVX) rats were injected in the third cerebral ventricle with 5 microliter of the globulin fraction of an antiserum raised against alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) or an equal volume of the globulin fraction of normal rabbit serum (NRS). Immunoneutralization of brain alpha-MSH produced an increase in the area under the secretion curve of prolactin (Prl), the amplitude of Prl pulses, and mean plasma Prl (P less than 0.01). In animals that had received two injections of NRS or anti-MSH and were subjected to a 2-min ether stress, Prl levels significantly increased within 5 minutes in the NRS-injected rats, whereas Prl levels in the antiserum-injected rats did not increase any further from the initially high baseline levels. The administration of antibodies against alpha-MSH produced a small increase (P less than 0.05) in the area under the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and mean plasma LH; however, the number of LH pulses was unaffected. We conclude that endogenous alpha-MSH of central origin is a physiological neuromodulator of release of Prl and LH in the OVX rat and is involved in the stress-induced release of Prl.     

Hypothalamic prolactin stimulates the release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone from male rat hypothalamus

Previous works from our laboratory and others have shown that there is a PRL-like immunoreactive protein with immunological, chromatographic, and biological characteristics identical to those of pituitary PRL, and this is widely distributed in the rat central nervous system. Since pituitary PRL is important in controlling hypothalamic LHRH release, we have hypothesized that hypothalamic PRL-like immunoreactive protein might serve a similar role, that of an endogenous neuromodulator influencing hypothalamic LHRH release. To this end, we have examined the effect of PRL antiserum and normal rabbit serum on the release of immunoreactive LHRH from rat hypothalamic fragments cultured in vitro. In the first experiment, LHRH release from hypothalami of intact rats, bathed in PRL antiserum (1:200 in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer), was significantly lower than that from hypothalami bathed in normal rabbit serum (1:200 in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer) for 90 min of incubation. It was, however, possible that the PRL, immunoneutralized in the first experiment, was material that represented contamination from pituitary PRL. Therefore, we repeated the experiment using hypothalami from animals that had been hypophysectomized 2 weeks before death. Again, PRL antibody significantly inhibited the release of LHRH compared with that by hypothalami incubated in normal rabbit serum. Since testosterone is important to LHRH synthesis, a third experiment was carried out using hypothalami from hypophysectomized male rats that had been implanted sc with testosterone-containing capsules 72 h before death. By 72 h serum testosterone levels had normalized. PRL antibody added to medium containing hypothalamic explants from these animals substantially inhibited in vitro LHRH release, a pattern essentially similar to that seen in intact and hypophysectomized animals without testosterone replacement. From these studies we have concluded that hypothalamic PRL is an important neuromodulator that promotes the release of LHRH from the hypothalamus. Testosterone, at least under the experimental conditions employed, appears not to be essential in this hypothalamic PRL-LHRH interaction.