应用逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测石蜡包埋腺泡状软组织肉瘤中ASPL-TFE3融合基因的表达

目的 探讨石蜡包埋腺泡状软组织肉瘤中t(X：17)(p11．2：q25)染色体易位融合基因ASPL-TFE3 mRNA表达的意义。方法 收集以4％甲醛固定、石蜡包埋腺泡状软组织肉瘤标本8例,运用逆转录一聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)方法检测ASPL-TFE3融合基因mRNA表达,以管家基因β-肌动蛋白(actin)作为内对照检测mRNA质量。另以腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤6例,肾细胞癌6例,副神经节瘤2例,颗粒细胞瘤1例作为对照。结果8例腺泡状软组织肉瘤中4例检测到ASPL-TFE32型融合基因mRNA的表达,2例检测出ASPL-TFE31型融合基因mRNA的表达,余2例β-actin和ASPL-TFE3的检测均为阴性。对照组未检出ASPL-TFE3融合基因,其中6例腺泡型横纹肌肉瘤中4例有PAX3／7-FKHR融合基因的表达。结论 石蜡包埋组织中ASPL-TFE3融合基因表达可作为腺泡状软组织肉瘤诊断和鉴别诊断的分子指标,并有助于其分子发生机制的回顾性研究。     

Two new cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma with t(X;1)(p11;q21) in females

Two cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a karyotype 46,X,t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) in two female patients aged 9 and 29 years are reported. These observations, and the review of the 17 reported cases with a translocation at band Xp11 confirm that this abnormality delineates a clinicopathological entity within the classical papillary RCC, characterized by the early age of occurrence and, probably, distinct histological features. Including these two new female cases, the sex ratio in cases with t(X;1) appears similar to that observed in the other papillary RCC.     

Distinct Xp11.2 breakpoints in two renal cell carcinomas exhibiting X;autosome translocations

Several human renal cell carcinomas with X;autosome translocations have been reported in recent years. The t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) appears to be a specific primary anomaly, suggesting that tumors with this translocation form a distinct subgroup of RCC. Here we report two new cases, one with a t(X;10)(p11.2;q23), the other with a t(X;1)(p11.2;p34). The common breakpoint in Xp11.2 suggests that they belong to the above-mentioned subset of RCC. Using FISH in conjunction with X-specific YAC clones, we demonstrate that the two new cases exhibited distinct breakpoints within Xp11.2.     

Five new cases of juvenile renal cell carcinoma with translocations involving Xp11.2: a cytogenetic and morphologic study

Two cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) carrying a t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) in a 12-year-old boy and a 14 year-old girl, two cases with a t(X;1)(p11.2;p34) in a 9-year-old boy and a 31-year-old woman, and one case with a t(X;17)(p11.2;q25) in a 15-year-old boy are reported. Two are likely papillary RCC, with clear or slightly eosinophilic cells, and two to a clear cell RCC; one shows a mixture of papillary and clear cell RCC architecture. Renal cell carcinomas with translocations involving Xp11.2 form a specific entity characterized by subtle pathologic features and younger age of occurrence, especially for those with the t(X;17).     

Nonrandom cell-cycle timing of a somatic chromosomal translocation: The t(X;17) of alveolar soft-part sarcoma occurs in G2

The cell-cycle timing of somatic chromosomal translocations in cancer remains poorly understood but may be relevant to their etiology and the mechanism of their formation. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare malignant soft-tissue tumor of uncertain lineage that provides an opportunity to address this question. The great majority of ASPSs have relatively simple near-diploid karyotypes characterized by an unbalanced der(17)t(X;17)(p11.2;q25), resulting in nonreciprocal fusion of TFE3 with ASPSCR1 (a.k.a. ASPL), with consequent net gain of Xp11.2-->pter and loss of 17q25-->qter. The presence of a normal X along with the der(17)t(X;17) in ASPSs that occur in men has been well described in previous cytogenetic reports and is most readily explained by a translocation in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. To establish whether formation in G2 is a general feature of the t(X;17), we examined polymorphic loci in Xp11.2-->qter in ASPS from 9 women, including 7 with an unbalanced t(X;17). Our analysis showed that all 7 displayed retention of heterozygosity at all informative markers on Xp11.2-->qter, supporting preferential formation of the t(X;17) in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Given that the two derivative chromosomes of a translocation in G2 would be expected to segregate together half the time, the predominance of an unbalanced der(17)t(X;17) also raises the possibility of a selective advantage in ASPS cells for gain of Xp11.2-->pter or loss of 17q25.3-->qter or retention of an active copy of TFE3.     

青少年肾细胞癌的临床病理及分子遗传学研究

目的 探讨青少年肾细胞癌的临床病理特征、遗传学改变、鉴别诊断及预后.方法 对46例青少年肾细胞癌进行光镜观察及免疫组织化学染色,随访并复习相关文献.对46例肿瘤进行von Hippel-Lindau(VHL)基因区域杂合性缺失(LOH)及VHL基因突变筛查.结果 共诊断19例Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌(Xp11 RCC)、9例透明细胞癌、17例乳头状肾细胞癌(PRCC)和1例不能分类肾细胞癌.19例Xp11 RCC均TFE3阳性,而TFEB阴性.8例肿瘤具有巢状和乳头状结构形态类似t(X;17)ASPL-TFE3型肾癌,6例肿瘤组织学类似t(X;1)PRCC-TFE3型肾癌,4例肿瘤形态像透明细胞癌,1例肿瘤组织学形态文献中未被检索到,表现为细胞核呈毛玻璃样,核仁不明显,可见核沟,肿瘤间质见大量黏液.LOH及VHL突变检测结果显示,仅1例透明细胞癌和1例2型PRCC存在LOH,并且该2型PRCC的VHL基因的一个剪切位点存在胚系突变,553+5 G→C.其余45例均未检测出VHL突变.统计学分析表明TFE3阳性肾细胞癌比TFE3阴性肾细胞癌更倾向于高病理分期(pT3/pT4),并且预后较差(P=0.035).结论 青少年肾细胞癌表现出不同的组织学形态以及分子遗传学背景.其中Xp11 RCC为最常见的肾癌亚型.TFE3阳性肾细胞癌的预后要差于TFE3阴性肾细胞癌.     

Bilateral renal tumors; conventional clear cell carcinoma and contralateral t(6;11)/t(X;17)-like tumor Histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and molecular genetic studies including the report of a novel mutation in the VHL gene

A 34-year-old pregnant woman with bilateral kidney tumors 9.5 and 2.5 cm in maximum diameter is presented. The larger tumor was clear renal cell carcinoma. The smaller contralateral tumor was focally HMB45 positive and had unusual histomorphology, including features resembling clear renal cell carcinoma with features of both t(6;11)- and t(X;17)/ASPL-TFE3 carcinomas. This tumor displayed a complex karyotype. A novel germ line mutation in the VHL gene (c.439A>G/p.I147V) was also identified in this patient.     

Characterization of renal cell carcinoma‐associated constitutional chromosome abnormalities by genome sequencing

Constitutional translocations, typically involving chromosome 3, have been recognized as a rare cause of inherited predisposition to renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for four decades. However, knowledge of the molecular basis of this association is limited. We have characterized the breakpoints by genome sequencing (GS) of constitutional chromosome abnormalities in five individuals who presented with RCC. In one individual with constitutional t(10;17)(q11.21;p11.2), the translocation breakpoint disrupted two genes: the known renal tumor suppressor gene (TSG) FLCN (and clinical features of Birt‐Hogg‐Dubé syndrome were detected) and RASGEF1A. In four cases, the rearrangement breakpoints did not disrupt known inherited RCC genes. In the second case without chromosome 3 involvement, the translocation breakpoint in an individual with a constitutional t(2;17)(q21.1;q11.2) mapped 12 Kb upstream of NLK. Interestingly, NLK has been reported to interact indirectly with FBXW7 and a previously reported RCC‐associated translocation breakpoint disrupted FBXW7. In two cases of constitutional chromosome 3 translocations, no candidate TSGs were identified in the vicinity of the breakpoints. However, in an individual with a constitutional chromosome 3 inversion, the 3p breakpoint disrupted the FHIT TSG (which has been reported previously to be disrupted in two apparently unrelated families with an RCC‐associated t(3;8)(p14.2;q24.1). These findings (a) expand the range of constitutional chromosome rearrangements that may be associated with predisposition to RCC, (b) confirm that chromosome rearrangements not involving chromosome 3 can predispose to RCC, (c) suggest that a variety of molecular mechanisms are involved the pathogenesis of translocation‐associated RCC, and (d) demonstrate the utility of GS for investigating such cases.     

Translocation (X;1) associated with a nonpapillary carcinoma in a young woman: a new definition for an Xp11.2 RCC subtype.

We report a translocation (X;1)(p11.2;q21) associated with a nontubulopapillary renal cell carcinoma in a 23-year-old woman. To our knowledge this the first report of such an association. A review of the previously published cases of renal cell carcinoma with t(X;1) and its cytogenetic variants with Xp11.2 anomalies is included. The role of this karyotype abnormality as a clinical marker is discussed. The Xp11.2 abnormality could be a primary abnormality characterizing a particular type of RCC appearing in children and young adults of both sexes and in which the histological aspect is not specific.     

Chromosomes in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. I. Synovial sarcoma.

It has been established that nonrandom chromosome rearrangements are characteristic of specific types of neoplasia. We present six new cases of sarcoma that had in common the same chromosome abnormality, i.e., a balanced translocation between chromosomes X and 18, t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2), and evaluate the 15 cases with this translocation in the literature. The histological diagnosis was synovial sarcoma in 19 cases and malignant fibrous histiocytoma and fibrosarcoma in the remaining two tumors, respectively. The translocation was found in tumors of both the biphasic and monophasic types, as well as in poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The two nonsynovial sarcomas with the t(X;18) were described as spindle cell tumors but failed to show the presence of cytokeratins by immunohistochemical stains. Even with the numerous variabilities on which this test depends, the cytogenetic analysis holds great promise as a tool for the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma.     

A distinctive pediatric renal neoplasm characterized by epithelioid morphology, basement membrane production, focal HMB45 immunoreactivity, and t(6;11)(p21.1;q12) chromosome translocation

We report two cases of a hitherto undescribed pediatric renal neoplasm that is distinctive at the morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic levels. On light microscopy, the tumors are composed of nests of polygonal, clear to eosinophilic cells associated with a subpopulation of smaller cells that surround hyaline material. Despite their epithelioid morphology, these tumors do not label immunohistochemically for epithelial markers but instead label focally for melanocytic markers HMB45 and Melan A. The hyaline material is positive with periodic acid-Schiff and methenamine-silver histochemical stains, and labels immunohistochemically for type 4 collagen. Ultrastructural examination confirms that it represents basement membrane material. Cytogenetic analysis reveals the identical t(6;11)(p21.1;q12) chromosome translocation as the sole abnormality in these two tumors, confirming their identity and distinctive nature.     

X;14 translocation:an exception to the critical region hypothesis on the human X-chromosome

We report on a family in which an X;14 translocation has been identified. A phenotypically normal female, carrier of an apparently balanced X-autosome translocation t(X;14)(q22;q24.3) in all her cells and a small interstitial deletion of band 15q112 in some of her cells had 2 offspring. She represents a fifth case of balanced X-autosome translocation with the break point inside the postulated critical region of Xq(q13 q26) associated with fertility. The break point in this case is located in Xq22, the same band as in four previously published exceptional cases. In most of her cells, the normal X was inactivated. Her daughter, the proposita, has an unbalanced karyotype 46,X,der(X), t(X;14)(q22;q24.3)mat, del(15)(q11.1q11.3)mat. She is mildly retarded and has some Prader-Willi syndrome manifestations. She has two normal 14 chromosomes, der(X), and deletion 15q11.2. Her clinical abnormalities probably could be attributed to the deletions 15q and Xq rather than 14q duplication. In most of cells, der(X) was inactivated. We assume that spreading of inactivation was extended to the 14q segment on the derivative X. Late replication and gene dose studies support this view. Another daughter, who inherited the balanced X;14 translocation and not deletion 15 chromosome, is phenotypically normal.     

Recent advances of immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of renal tumors

The recent classification of renal tumors has been proposed according to genetic characteristics as well as morphological difference. In this review, we summarize the immunohistochemical characteristics of each entity of renal tumors. Regarding translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3, TFEB and ALK protein expression is crucial in establishing the diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC, renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21;q12), and renal carcinoma with ALK rearrangement, respectively. In dialysis‐related RCC, neoplastic cells of acquired cystic disease‐associated RCC are positive for alpha‐methylacyl‐CoA racemase (AMACR), but negative for cytokeratin (CK) 7, whereas clear cell papillary RCC shows the inverse pattern. The diffuse positivity for carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) is diagnostic for clear cell RCC. Co‐expression of CK7 and CA9 is characteristic of multilocular cystic RCC. CK7 and AMACR are excellent markers for papillary RCC and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. CD82 and epithelial‐related antigen (MOC31) may be helpful in the distinction between chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma. WT1 and CD57 highlights the diagnosis of metanephric adenoma. The combined panel of PAX2 and PAX8 may be useful in the diagnosis of metastatic RCC.