A dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD), paclitaxel and oxaliplatin (L-OHP) administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Thirty-nine pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors received escalated doses of PEG-LD (10-16 mg/m(2)), paclitaxel (100-120 mg/m(2)) and L-OHP (50-70 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks. As one cycle of treatment was considered the administration of both drugs on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. RESULTS: The MTDs were PEG-LD 14 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 120 mg/m(2) and L-OHP 70 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the DLT in all but one case with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. Four (4%) and 13 (12%) cycles were complicated by grades 4 and 3 neutropenia, respectively. Grades 2-3 fatigue and neurotoxicity occurred in 13 and 12% of cycles, respectively. Responses were observed in patients with breast, endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: This is a quite well-tolerated regimen which merits further evaluation in phase II studies.     

Phase 1 clinical study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (JNS002) in Japanese patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, JNS002) is a formulation of doxorubicin encapsulated polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes with prolonged circulation time and unique toxicity profile. This phase 1 study was aimed at investigating the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in Japanese patients with solid tumors. METHODS: Patients with solid tumors not amenable to standard forms of treatment were eligible. PLD was administered as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks. Dose escalation of PLD was planned from 30 to 60 mg/m(2) in 10 mg/m(2) increments. The pharmacokinetics of total doxorubicin (encapsulated plus non-encapsulated) in plasma were examined for the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, aged 49-69 (median; 56) years with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. The major non-hematological toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (HFS), rash and stomatitis. Myelosuppression, especially leukopenia and neutropenia were major hematological toxicities. Although HFS was not severe, a delay of doses for subsequent cycles was required with multiple dosing. The peak plasma concentration and the area under the concentration time curve of PLD increased proportionally to the dose. Objective response was observed in one patient and the normalization of tumor marker values in another. These two patients had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase 2 clinical studies of PLD in Japanese patients was 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks. The encouraging results prompted us to plan a subsequent clinical study of PLD against ovarian cancer.     

A phase I pharmacodynamic trial of bortezomib in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced cancer

Purpose  This phase I trial sought to define the toxicity, maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacodynamics of a combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients and methods  Twenty-six patients were treated with bortezomib intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, with doxorubicin also administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, both in a 21-day cycle. Dosing ranged from 1.0 mg/m² of bortezomib with 15 mg/m² of doxorubicin to 1.5 mg/m² of bortezomib with 20 mg/m² of doxorubicin. Pharmacodynamic studies performed included assessment of levels of 20S proteasome activity and ubiquitin-protein conjugates. Results  The combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin was generally well tolerated. There were two dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at dose cohort 3 (1.3 mg/m² bortezomib, 20 mg/m² doxorubicin) and 2 DLT at dose cohort 3a (1.5 mg/m² bortezomib, 15 mg/m² doxorubicin). DLT seen included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neuropathy. In addition, one patient developed grade 3 central nervous system toxicity in cycle 2 (not a DLT). One patient with hormone refractory prostate cancer had a partial response. Proteasome inhibition in whole blood was demonstrated and an increase in ubiquitin-protein conjugates was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of most patients. Conclusions  Bortezomib and doxorubicin can be administered safely. The recommended phase II dose for this 21-day cycle is bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, and doxorubicin 20 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8. This combination may be of special interest in multiple myeloma, given the activity of both drugs in that disease. Supported by grant: U01 CA062491 “Early Clinical Trials of Anti-Cancer Agents With Phase I Emphasis, NCI” and M01 RR03186 “General Clinical Research Center Program of The National Center for Research Resources, NIH”.     

Metastatic breast cancer: the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin after conventional anthracyclines

Anthracyclines demonstrate significant disease activity in breast cancer and are a key component of therapy in both early and advanced disease. It has been long recognized that these agents are associated with cumulative dose-related cardiotoxicity that often limits their utility at the time of disease recurrence. The risk of anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity appears to be highest in women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer previously having received an adjuvant anthracycline-trastuzumab regimen. Clinical trials have demonstrated that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is equally active but associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiotoxicity compared with conventional doxorubicin whether administered as monotherapy or in combination with trastuzumab. Thus, PLD can be effectively and safely substituted for conventional doxorubicin, allowing retreatment with an anthracycline in the metastatic setting. PLD has also been shown to improve time to tumor progression when used as maintenance therapy. These data, when coupled with the need to maintain efficacy and reduce cardiotoxicity in the management of metastatic breast cancer, support the use of PLD in the metastatic setting, as well as support the rationale for evaluating PLD as adjuvant therapy.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/carboplatin combination in ovarian cancer,progressing on single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and carboplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma (ROC), following disease progression on single agent PLD.METHODS: An analysis of the medical records of 10 patients with ROC, treated in our institution with a combination of PLD and carboplatin following progression on single-agent PLD therapy was performed. The median age was 59.1 years (range, 45 to 77 years). All diagnoses were histological-proven. Eight of the 10 patients were platinum-resistant. Following disease progression on single-agent PLD treatment, carboplatin area under the curve (AUC)-5 was added to PLD in all 10 patients. In order to assess disease status, Ca-125 was assessed before each PLD/carboplatin treatment. Relative changes in Ca-125 values were calculated, and response defined as a greater than 50% reduction in Ca-125 from baseline. Radiographic studies were re-evaluated and responses to therapy based on computer tomography (CT) scans carried out on a regular basis every 2-3 mo in each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (V19).RESULTS: A median of 10 cycles (range, 2-26) of the carboplatin-PLD combination was given. Of the 10 treated patients, 6 had > 50% reduction in Ca-125 levels from baseline, 4 of these had a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and the other 2 patients had no measurable disease. In a further 2 patients with a best response of disease stabilization and < 50% reduction of Ca-125 levels, one had progression of disease after 26 cycles, and the second progressed with brain metastases following 12 cycles. Seven of the eight patients who were platinum-resistant showed evidence of clinical benefit on carboplatin-PLD combination therapy; 5 of these had > 50% reduction in Ca-125 level, 4 also showed a partial response on CT scan. The treatment was generally well-tolerated by the patients.CONCLUSION: Addition of carboplatin to PLD, after disease progression on single-agent PLD therapy, is both effective and safe in patients with ROC, even in those with Platinum-resistant disease.     

A phase I dose-finding study of a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil), carboplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer

Standard chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is a combination of platinum-paclitaxel. One strategy to improve the outcome for patients is to add other agents to standard therapy. Doxil is active in relapsed disease and has a response rate of 25% in platinum-resistant relapsed disease. A dose finding study of doxil-carboplatin-paclitaxel was therefore undertaken in women receiving first-line therapy. Thirty-one women with epithelial ovarian cancer or mixed Mullerian tumours of the ovary were enrolled. The doses of carboplatin, paclitaxel and doxil were as follows: carboplatin AUC 5 and 6; paclitaxel, 135 and 175 mg m(-2); doxil 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg m(-2). Schedules examined included treatment cycles of 21 and 28 days, and an alternating schedule of carboplatin-paclitaxel (q 21) with doxil being administered every other course (q 42). The dose-limiting toxicities were found to be neutropenia, stomatitis and palmar plantar syndrome and the maximum tolerated dose was defined as; carboplatin AUC 5, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) and doxil 30 mg m(-2) q 21. Reducing the paclitaxel dose to 135 mg m(-2) did not allow the doxil dose to be increased. Delivering doxil on alternate cycles at doses of 40 and 50 mg m(-2) also resulted in dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended doses for phase II/III trials are carboplatin AUC 6, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2), doxil 30 mg m(-2) q 28 or carboplatin AUC 5, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2), doxil 20 mg m(-2) q 21. Grade 3/4 haematologic toxicity was common at the recommended phase II doses but was short lived and not clinically important and non-haematologic toxicities were generally mild and consisted of nausea, paraesthesiae, stomatitis and palmar plantar syndrome.     

Phase II study of temozolomide plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of brain metastases from solid tumours

Objective: A combination regimen of temozolomide (TMZ) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been evaluated in the treatment of brain metastases from solid tumours. Study design: Nineteen consecutive patients (pts) have been enrolled in a prospective phase II trial and treated with TMZ 200 mg/m² (days 1–5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m² (day 1) every 28 days. The study was prospectively projected according to the Simon’s two-stage optimal design. Results: Major toxicities have been grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in one patient (pt) and grade III erythrodisesthesia in two pts. Three pts achieved a complete response (CR) and four a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 36.8% (95% CI: 19.1–59.2), which exceeded the target activity in the study design. A significant improvement in quality of life was demonstrated by FACT-G analysis. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 5.5 (95% CI: 2.7–8.2) months while the median Overall Survival (OS) was 10.0 months (95% CI: 6.3–13.7). Conclusions: The TMZ/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin regimen was well tolerated with an encouraging activity in brain metastases from solid tumours.     

Chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cisplatin in recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is the only nonplatinum agent to significantly improve survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of PLD plus cisplatin combination therapy in these patients. METHODS: Twenty-two women (median age, 57 years) with ovarian cancer that recurred 6 months or more after standard carboplatin and paclitaxel therapy were eligible for enrollment. Cisplatin was administered intravenously as a 60-min infusion on day 1, at a single dose of 60 mg/m(2), and PLD was given intravenously as a 1-h infusion on day 2, at a dose of 50 mg/m(2). Treatment cycles were repeated on an outpatient basis every 28 days. RESULTS: Hematological toxicity was mainly leucopenia/neutropenia, and this was the principal dose-limiting toxicity. Severe (grade III-IV) leucopenia/neutropenia was observed in 7 (32%) and 9 (41%) patients, respectively. Only 2 (9%) patients were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Grade III-IV anemia occurred in only 4 (18%) patients. Severe thrombocytopenia was not noted; only 5 patients (23%) had grade I-II toxicity. NO toxicity in biochemical parameters was noted. Several severe nonhematological adverse effects were managed according to standard protocols and were transient, as well as being well-tolerated. Twenty-one patients were evaluated for response. The overall response rate was 62% (13 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-82%), with four (19%) complete and nine (43%) partial responses. At the time of last follow-up, all of the 22 patients were alive. The median follow-up period was 8.5 months (range, 2 to 22 months). CONCLUSION: PLD combined with cisplatin at the schedule and dosage used in this study is an active and safe second-line chemotherapy regimen with acceptable and easily manageable toxicities in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.     

Phase I study of olaparib in combination with liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

Olaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity as monotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA)-mutated breast and ovarian cancer. This study evaluated olaparib capsules in combination with liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced solid tumours ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00819221","term_id":"NCT00819221"}}NCT00819221).

Methods:

Patients received 28-day cycles of olaparib, continuously (days 1–28) or intermittently (days 1–7), plus PLD (40 mg m⁻², day 1); seven olaparib dose cohorts (50–400 mg bid) were explored to determine the recommended dose. Assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy (objective response rate (ORR)).

Results:

Of 44 patients treated (ovarian, n=28; breast, n=13; other/unknown, n=3), two experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 stomatitis and fatal pneumonia/pneumonitis (200 mg per 28-day cycle); grade 4 thrombocytopenia (400 mg per 7-day cycle)). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached using continuous olaparib 400 mg bid plus PLD. Grade ⩾3 and serious AEs were reported for 27 (61%) and 12 (27%) patients, respectively. No major pharmacokinetic interference was observed between olaparib and PLD. The ORR was 33% (n=14 out of 42; complete response, n=3). A total of 13 responders had ovarian cancer: 10 were platinum-sensitive, 11 had a gBRCA mutation.

Conclusions:

Continuous/intermittent olaparib (up to 400 mg bid) combined with PLD (40 mg m⁻²) was generally tolerated and showed evidence of antitumour activity in ovarian cancer.     

A pilot study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

Background Both gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) are antineoplastic drugs with clinical activity in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly scheduled gemcitabine and PLD combination therapy in such patients. Methods Eighteen women with ovarian cancer that had recurred within 6 months after standard carboplatin and paclitaxel therapy were eligible for enrollment. Gemcitabine 2000 mg/m² and PLD 20 mg/m² were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results Hematological toxicity was mild. No severe (grade III/IV) leucopenia/neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was observed. Severe anemia was seen in only 3 (17%) patients. Several other severe nonhematological adverse effects were well tolerated and easily managed. The overall response rate was 28% (5 of 18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%–54%) with 2 (11%) complete and 3 (17%) partial responses. The median overall survival time was 17 months (range, 1 to 25 months). The median survival for patients with clinical benefit including disease response or stabilization was 17 months (range, 3 to 26 months) compared to that of patients with progressive disease, which was 2 months (range, 1 to 11 months; P = 0.04). Conclusion A biweekly schedule of gemcitabine combined with PLD is an active and safe chemotherapy regimen with acceptable and easily manageable toxicities in women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.     

Weekly paclitaxel combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CaelyxTM) given every 4 weeks: dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the toxicity of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Caelyx trade mark ) and weekly paclitaxel (wPTX), and to investigate pharmacokinetics of PLD in this combination. METHODS: A phase I study was performed with an initial dose of 50 mg/m(2) wPTX and 30 mg/m(2) PLD. The paclitaxel dose was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m(2) and PLD in increments of 5 mg/m(2) until the MTD was reached. The pharmacokinetics of PLD were studied at the highest achieved dose levels. RESULTS: Forty-four cancer patients were enrolled. The MTD was 30/90 and 35/80 mg/m(2) for PLD/wPTX. Dose-limiting toxicities included treatment delay for neutropenia grade 3, febrile neutropenia, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and deep venous thrombosis. Toxicity below the MTD was mild: skin toxicity grade 1-2 developed at high cumulative doses and vascular thrombotic events occurred in two patients with predisposing factors. No cardiotoxicity or clinically relevant peripheral neuropathy was seen. Nausea/vomiting and alopecia were negligible. Three complete responses and nine partial responses were documented among 34 evaluable cases. PLD plasma concentrations were evaluated in seven patients treated at subMTD. Paclitaxel produced a median 53.5% increase of PLD area under the concentration curve (range 4.4%-219%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PLD/wPTX constitutes an active chemotherapy regimen with mild toxicity that merits investigation in phase II at 30/80 or 35/70 mg/m(2). Patients should be monitored for a potentially increased risk of thromboembolic events.     

A phase I and pharmacologic study of the MDR converter GF120918 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background Resistance to chemotherapy can partly be explained by the activity of membrane bound P-glycoprotein. Competitive inhibition of P-glycoprotein, by multidrug resistance (MDR) converters, may overcome this MDR. Previously studied MDR converters either have serious intrinsic side effects or considerably influence the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic agents at concentrations theoretically required to convert MDR. GF120918 is a third-generation MDR converter with high affinity for P-glycoprotein and can be given orally. We performed a phase 1 study with escalating doses of GF120918 in combination with doxorubicin.Patients and methods The study group comprised 46 patients with advanced solid tumors. Doxorubicin was administered on day 1 (cycle 1), GF120918 on days 22–24 (cycle 2), and on days 29–33 with doxorubicin administered on day 31 (cycle 3). Pharmacokinetics of both GF120918 and doxorubicin were studied. The starting daily dose of GF120918 was 50 mg and was to be increased in subsequent cohorts until a steady state plasma level of 100 ng/ml was reached. The starting dose of doxorubicin was 50 mg/m² and was to be increased after reaching the target dose level of GF120918.Results In 37 of the 46 patients, full pharmacokinetic data from the three scheduled cycles were obtained. Pharmacokinetics of GF120918 showed a less than linear increase in C _max with increasing doses, with considerable interpatient variation. The target steady-state plasma level for GF120918 was exceeded in 12 out of 19 patients who received 400 mg GF120918 alone twice daily and in 12 of 17 patients who received 400 mg GF120918 twice daily in combination with doxorubicin. GF120918 pharmacokinetics were not influenced by coadministration of doxorubicin. The doxorubicin AUC was only marginally influenced by GF120918 and only at the highest dose levels. In these patients there was a significant increase in the AUC of doxorubicinol in cycle 3 as compared to cycle 1. Hematologic toxicity mainly consisted of neutropenia and was more severe in cycle 3 than in cycle 1 (13 vs 5 patients with grade 4 neutropenia, P=0.003). Neutropenic fever was the dose-limiting toxicity at a doxorubicin dose of 75 mg/m² with 400 mg GF120918 twice daily. The toxicity of GF120918 was limited to somnolence in eight patients and occasional gastrointestinal complaints.Conclusion GF120918 is an MDR converter with only minimal side effects at a dose level yielding concentrations able to convert the action of P-glycoprotein in vitro. A doxorubicin dose of 60 mg/m² on day 3 in combination with 400 mg GF120918 twice daily on days 1–5 is an acceptable regimen for further clinical trials.     

Interaction pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) on coadministration with paclitaxel or docetaxel

Purpose To investigate the pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Caelyx) when given as a single agent and in combination with the taxanes paclitaxel or docetaxel in humans.Methods The plasma kinetics of PLD were studied in 19 cancer patients treated with PLD every 4 weeks combined with either paclitaxel (on a weekly basis in seven and as a single infusion in three patients) or docetaxel (weekly in seven and as a single infusion in two). Plasma concentrations of PLD were quantified in two sets of samples per patient to compare the same pharmacokinetic parameters in each subject when treated with single-agent PLD and again with the combination. Total doxorubicin concentrations in plasma were quantified by HPLC. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis and the data obtained were compared for differences by a matched-pairs nonparametric test.Results Coadministration of paclitaxel produced a median/mean 54/80% increase in PLD AUC_inf (95% confidence interval 23% to 136%, P=0.002). The observed increase was consistent among all subjects. PLD clearance was also decelerated in the presence of paclitaxel (P=0.013) while other pharmacokinetic parameters were affected modestly. A small increase in the AUC of PLD was observed in the docetaxel/PLD arm (mean increase 12%, P=0.039) while PLD clearance decreased marginally and other pharmacokinetic parameters remained unaffected. AUC extrapolated to infinity was below 8% in both arms.Conclusions This study showed the presence of a pharmacokinetic interaction that led to higher plasma concentrations of PLD when combined with paclitaxel and to a minor extent when combined with docetaxel. This pharmacokinetic information may be of value when planning combination therapies of PLD with taxanes.     

A randomized, double-blind study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

BACKGROUND: Despite a decreased incidence of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) due to the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy, approximately 15% of AIDS patients still develop AIDS-related KS. This study evaluated the clinical benefit, tumor response, and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of AIDS-related KS. METHODS. This was a double-blind, multicenter study that randomized patients with AIDS-related KS to six cycles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m2; n = 60) or liposomal daunorubicin (40 mg/m2; n = 19) every 2 weeks. Clinical benefit was assessed using patient questionnaires and monitoring of KS-associated symptoms. Tumor responses were assessed using imaging techniques, direct measurement of skin lesions, and photographs, when possible. RESULTS. Clinical benefit was observed in 48/60 patients (80%) receiving pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and was maintained for a median of 62 days (range, 28-107 days). Clinical benefit was achieved by 12/19 patients (63.2%) receiving liposomal daunorubicin and was maintained for a median of 55 days (range, 28-84 +days). Clinical benefit correlated with tumor response. Tumor responses were achieved by 55.0% of patients receiving pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 31.6% of patients receiving liposomal daunorubicin. Response rates were similar within each treatment group when only those patients without changes in antiretroviral therapy during treatment were considered. Adverse events associated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin were neutropenia (30%), nausea (28.3%), and asthenia (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is safe and effective for the treatment of AIDS-related KS, with most patients experiencing clinical benefit, tumor response, or both.     

Carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in very platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients: Results from a subset analysis of the CALYPSO phase III trial

AimTo perform a subset analysis of patients with very platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) enrolled in the phase III CALYPSO trial.Patients and methodsThe international non-inferiority trial enrolled women with ROC that relapsed >6 months following first- or second-line platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapies. Patients were randomised to CD [carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)] or CP (carboplatin–paclitaxel) and stratified by treatment-free interval (TFI). In this analysis, patients with a TFI > 24 months were analysed separately for progression free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint of CALYPSO, overall survival (OS) and safety.ResultsA total of 259 very platinum-sensitive patients were included (n = 131, CD; n = 128, CP). Median PFS was 12.0 months for the CD arm and 12.3 months for CP [HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.79–1.40); P = 0.73 for superiority] and median OS was 40.2 months for CD and 43.9 for CP [HR = 1.18 (95% CI 0.85–1.63); P = 0.33 for superiority]. Overall response rates were 42% and 38%, respectively (P = 0.46). Toxicities were more common with CP versus CD, including grade 3/4 neutropenia (40.8% versus 27.5%; P = 0.025), nausea (4.8% versus 3.1%; P = 0.47), allergic reaction (8% versus 3.1%; P = 0.082) sensory neuropathy (4.8% versus 2.3%; P = 0.27) and grade 2 alopecia (88% versus 9.2%; P < 0.001). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (12.2% versus 3.2%; P = 0.007) and mucositis (2.3% versus 0%; P = 0.089) were more common with CD. Grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome occurred rarely with CD (3 patients versus 0 in CP arm; P = 0.089).ConclusionCP and CD were equally effective treatment regimens for patients with very platinum-sensitive ROC. The favourable risk–benefit profile suggests carboplatin–PLD as treatment of choice for these patients.     

Phase I clinical trial of topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combination topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) administered in 4- or 3-week cycles in patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with intravenous topotecan (0.75-1.25 mg/m²) for 3 days followed by PLD (25-40 mg/m²) on Day 4. The following dose combinations (topotecan/PLD, mg/m²) were explored: 0.75/40, 1.0/40, and 1.25/40 every 28 days; and 1.0/25 and 1.0/30 every 21 days. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled, and all had received prior chemotherapy. Most (84 percent) patients had ovarian cancer. A total of 157 cycles (median, 4 cycles; range, 1-19 cycles) of chemotherapy were administered. Dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 4 neutropenia and death at dose level 3 (1.25/40 mg/m² every 28 days), and neutropenic fever, Grade 3 stomatitis, and Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy (all in one patient) at dose level 5 (1/30 mg/m² every 21 days). Myelosuppression was the most common serious toxicity. Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response and 7 (27 percent) had partial responses. All responses were seen in patients with ovarian cancer. Conclusions: This combination is feasible and well tolerated; encouraging activity was observed in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. The recommended regimens for a Phase II study are topotecan 1.0 mg/m² on Days 1-3 followed by PLD 40 mg/m² on Day 4 of a 28-day cycle, and topotecan 1.0 mg/m² on Days 1-3 and PLD 30 mg/m² on Day 4 of a 21-day cycle.     

Second-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is highly effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in late relapse: a GINECO phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard second-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) in late relapse. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has significant single-agent activity in this setting. Therefore, we evaluated the use of PLD plus carboplatin in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PLD 30 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg.min/ml, repeated every 28 days for a maximum of nine cycles, was administered to 104 women with AOC relapsing >or=6 months after completion of first- or second-line therapy with platinum-taxane-based regimens. RESULTS: Overall response was 63%, with a 38% complete response, median progression-free survival of 9.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 32 months. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 51% of patients, but febrile neutropenia in only 3%. Nonhematologic toxic effects were primarily grades 1 and 2, with low rates of alopecia and neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: PLD plus carboplatin is highly effective, prolongs OS, and is well tolerated in women with AOC in late relapse previously treated with both platinum and taxanes. Evaluation of this regimen in phase III trials is warranted.     

A phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and temsirolimus in patients with refractory solid malignancies

This study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination with temsirolimus (T) in patients with refractory solid tumors. Using a standard “3+3” dose escalation design, 23 patients were enrolled in three dosing cohorts in this phase I study. The starting dose level was PLD at 30 mg/m² every 4 weeks and T at 20 mg weekly. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of doxorubicin were evaluated for patients in the expansion cohort. The most common treatment-related adverse events of all grades were mucositis/stomatitis (69.6 %), anorexia (52.2 %), thrombocytopenia (52.2 %), and fatigue (47.8 %). The recommended doses of this combination for phase II studies are 25 mg/m² PLD and 25 mg T. PK analyses suggested increased exposure of doxorubicin in this combination regimen compared to doxorubicin administered as a single agent, possibly due to PK drug interactions. Out of 18 patients evaluable for a treatment response, two had partial responses (PR) (breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma) and six had stable disease (SD). Two patients remained on treatment for more than 1 year. The combination of PLD and T is tolerable, and the treatment resulted in clinical benefit. The combination regimen should be further explored in appropriate tumor types.     

A phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background:Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has an enhancedefficacy and reduced toxicity compared with free doxorubicin. The efficacy andtoxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was investigated in patients withhepatocellular carcinoma. Patients and methods:Patients with histologically confirmed,locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma and a Karnofsky index>60% were included in this prospective single-arm study. Exclusioncriteria were liver cirrhosis stage Child–Pugh C, previous chemotherapy,or chemoembolization. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was given in a dose of30 mg/m² every three weeks until progression of disease. Afterinclusion of five patients the dose could be escalated to 40 mg/m²in absence of toxicity grade 3 and 4. Results:Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. Noobjective response was achieved. The median survival time was 140 days(95% confidence interval: 126–154 days). Treatment toxicitiesgrade 3 comprised increased liver enzymes in patients with preexistinggrade 1 or 2 elevation (n = 6), hematologic toxicity (n =5), and hypersensitivity (n = 2). Conclusions:Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is not effective fortreatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The favorable toxicity profilewas confirmed even in patients with underlying liver disease.