ZyQv视力表在角膜屈光手术中的应用分析

目的 介绍一种新型的不同对比度视力表(ZyQv视力表,美国Baush&Lomb公司)及其临床应用.方法 以准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视为例,使用ZyQv视力表测量54例近视患者手术前后不同对比度和不同照明环境下的视力,并与标准对数视力表的测量结果进行对比.结果 标准对数视力表测得的术前BCVA和术后不同时间点UCVA之间均无显著差异;使用ZyQv视力表发现:术后1周时,三组患者明暗环境中90%对比度视力均有显著下降,术后1月时均恢复至术前水平;三组患者明暗环境中10%对比度视力均于术后1周显著下降,其中低度近视组于术后1月恢复至术前水平,而中度和高度近视组在术后3月时仍低于术前水平(明环境中10%对比度视力除外).结论 ZyQv视力表操作便捷,在角膜屈光手术中可用于完善术前检查,综合评价术后视觉质量,动态观察术后视力恢复,协助临床实验和相关研究.     

屈光参差与双眼视觉相关性的临床观察

目的:观察远、近视性屈光参差对患者双眼视功能的影响。方法:采用颜少明等的《立体视觉检查图》和同视机,对矫正视力≥0.9的近视和远视性屈光参差患者174例,分别测定其近立体视和同视机三级视功能。结果:(1)远、近视性屈光参差患者视力矫正后双眼视功能明显好于裸眼,两者矫正前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。(2)矫正后近视性屈光参差近立体视及融合功能正常者的例数明显多于远视性屈光参差者(P均=0.000);远视性屈光参差远立体视功能正常者的例数明显多于近视性屈光参差者(P=0.000)。(3)矫正后近视性屈光参差者的近立体视锐度与屈光参差差值大小相关(P=0.000),屈光参差差值越大,近立体视功能越差;远视性屈光参差者的近立体视锐度与屈光参差差值大小相关性不明显(P=0.159)。(4)远、近视性屈光参差患者矫正后,近立体视正常患者的构成比小于正常范围为17%及44%。结论:(1)远、近视性屈光参差对双眼视功能的影响不相同,远视性屈光参差对双眼视功能的影响大于近视性屈光参差。(2)无论近视或远视性屈光参差,其对双眼视觉的损害是明显的。     

屈光参差及其与弱视程度的关系探讨

目的　探讨双眼屈光参差程度与弱视程度的关系。方法　对 1 0 4例远视性屈光参差与 1 3例近视性屈光参差性弱视作屈光参差及双眼视力差的统计学分析。结果　远视性屈光参差组中 ,屈光参差程度与视力差关系密切 ,屈光参差程度越大 ,视力差越大。而在近视性屈光参差组中 ,二者未发现有显著性差异。结论　远视性屈光参差与双眼视力差明显相关。近视性屈光参差例数少 ,尚需积累资料进一步研究     

近视性屈光参差与双眼视功能相关性的临床观察

目的探讨近视性屈光参差对成人双眼视功能的影响。设计回顾性病例系列研究。研究对象近视性屈光参差患者100例,不伴有斜视和弱视。方法测定屈光参差患者的裸眼视力、屈光状态、最佳矫正视力、矫正前后同视机双眼视功能和颜少明《随机立体检查图》近立体视功能,分析屈光参差对双眼视功能的影响。主要指标屈光参差度及双眼三级视功能。结果(1)近视性屈光参差患者戴镜后双眼视功能明显好于裸眼,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P均=0．000)。(2)具有正常立体视功能者的屈光参差度小于(3．329±0．137)D；具有次正常立体视功能者的屈光参差度小于(4．145±0．217)D；无立体视功能者的屈光参差度大于(5．271±0．351)D。结论近视性屈光参差对双眼视功能有显著性影响,屈光参差度越大,对双眼视功能的影响也就越大。(眼科,2006,15：324-326)     

远、近视性屈光参差视功能对比研究

目的：对比分析远、近视性屈光参差对患者双眼视功能的影响。

方法：对238例屈光矫正后的屈光参差者和30例正常者进行近立体视和同视机三级视功能检查,并记录其结果。

结果：近视性屈光参差远、近立体视及融合功能正常者的例数高于远视性屈光参差者。远视性屈光参差组有正常立体视者少,低度屈光参差组以亚正常立体视者为主,而高、重度屈光参差组多无立体视; 近视性屈光参差组多有正常立体视或亚正常立体视。

结论：近视性屈光参差的双眼视功能总体优于远视性屈光参差,但屈光参差与立体视的关系应按性质分别进行分析。     

近视性屈光参差患者LASIK术后双眼视功能评估

目的 观察近视性屈光参差患者接受准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（LASIK）后双眼视功能的变化,探讨LASIK手术矫治近视性屈光参差对三级视功能的影响,从双眼视觉的变化评价其临床应用价值。设计 前瞻性病例系列。 研究对象 36例（72眼）行LASIK手术的近视性屈光参差患者（双眼屈光参差 ≥ 2.50 D）。 方法 对36例行LASIK手术的近视性屈光参差患者分别于手术前和手术后3个月进行裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力、屈光状态和同视机双眼视功能的检测,并对双眼视功能的变化进行随访研究。 主要指标 手术前后裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力、屈光度、同时视、融合功能、远立体视和近立体视。 结果 术前72眼的裸眼视力在0.01~0.2之间,术后3个月时均达到1.0。双眼屈光参差由术前的（5.01±1.96）D（ 2.50~9.00 D）,降低到术后3个月的（0.28±0.22）D（0.00~0.75 D）。手术前后的屈光参差度的改变,差异均有显著统计学意义（P＜0.01）。26例屈光参差量≥2.50 D且≤6.00 D的高度屈光参差者术前戴框架眼镜下近立体视正常的12例,术后3个月增至22例,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;16例屈光参差量>6.0 D的重度屈光参差者手术前后均没有正常近立体视。术前戴框架眼镜下三级视功能（同时视、融合功能、远立体视）正常的分别为33例、18例、13例,LASIK术后3个月三级视功能正常的分别为34例、33例、23例,手术后获得融合功能和远立体视者较术前明显增加（P均＜0.05）。结论 LASIK矫治近视性屈光参差,不仅可提高患者裸眼视力,而且可通过减小患者双眼间的屈光差异,增加双眼物像的融合,改善立体视功能。     

LASIK矫正成人近视性屈光参差疗效分析

目的:探讨成人近视性屈光参差的病因,观察准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser in situkeratomileusis,LASIK)矫正近视性屈光参差的临床疗效。方法:根据屈光度将104例208眼成人近视性屈光参差患者的双眼分为高度数组和低度数组,对186眼施行LASIK手术,采用术后6mo随访信息,对其手术前后的平均屈光度、屈光参差的程度、裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力和眼轴等进行比较分析。结果:LASIK术后6mo,所有术眼的裸眼视力均明显提高,屈光参差的程度明显减小;最佳矫正视力保持不变,或较术前有不同程度的提高。术前两组间比较角膜曲率无明显差异,而眼轴有明显差异。同一眼术前、后角膜曲率变化明显,眼轴无明显变化。结论:成人近视性屈光参差(>2.50D)主要是由于双眼轴发育不均衡造成的眼轴的参差。LASIK矫治成人近视性屈光参差安全、有效、预测性好,是此类患者提高裸眼视力及矫正视力,改善屈光参差的首选方法。     

屈光参差性弱视儿童双眼视觉状态

目的：分析屈光参差性弱视儿童的屈光状态、矫正视力情况及其与双眼视觉功能的关系。方法：横断面研究。收集2015年11月至2016年9月就诊于北京9家医院（分布于8个区县）的屈光参差性弱视儿童患者106例（106眼），年龄（6.2±5.4）岁。根据屈光参差危险因素将所有患者分为远视性屈光参差组（67例）、近视性屈光参差组（5例）、散光性屈光参差组（12例）、远视合并散光性屈光参差组（20例）及近视合并散光性屈光参差组（2例）。对所有患者行裸眼视力（UCVA）、矫正视力（BCVA）、屈光状态、远近立体视等检查。采用Pearson相关性分析双眼屈光参差的差值程度与高度屈光不正眼UCVA、BCVA及双眼视觉间的相关性，并分析双眼矫正视力差值程度与双眼视觉的相关性。采用单因素方差分析比较5组高度屈光不正眼BCVA及远近立体视情况。结果：屈光参差的差值程度与高度屈光不正眼UCVA和BCVA、远立体视、近立体视（即随机点立体视，包括立体视锐度、交叉立体视、非交叉立体视）均呈负相关（均P<0.05）；双眼矫正视力差值与远立体视、近立体视均呈负相关（均P<0.05）。5组间在高度屈光不正眼BCVA、远立体视、近立体视方面总体差异均有统计学意义（F=6.221、5.271、3.622、3.647、3.464，P<0.05），进一步两两比较显示高度屈光不正眼BCVA在近视性屈光参差组最好，然后依次为远视性屈光参差组、散光性屈光参差组、近视合并散光性屈光参差组以及远视合并散光性屈光参差组，组间差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）；远立体视在远视性屈光参差组最好，然后依次为近视性屈光参差组、散光性屈光参差组，组间差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05），但远视合并散光性屈光参差组与近视合并散光性屈光参差组的远立体视差异无统计学意义；近立体视在近视性屈光参差组最好，然后依次为远视性屈光参差组、散光性屈光参差组、远视合并散光性屈光参差组以及近视合并散光性屈光参差组，组间差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论：屈光参差性弱视儿童的屈光参差程度与视力、立体视功能相关，且立体视功能和双眼矫正视力差值也有相关性。不同类型屈光参差儿童立体视损害有所差异。     

间歇性外斜视患者屈光参差的特点及其对视功能的影响

目的 探讨间歇性外斜视患者屈光参差的特点及其对视功能的影响.方法 对1149例间歇性外斜视患者中筛查出合并有屈光参差的285例患者资料进行回顾性总结和分析,根据屈光状态分为近视性、远视性、近视散光性、远视散光性和混合性屈光参差.观察项目包括患者的视力、屈光状态、Titmus立体视功能.结果 (1)间歇性外斜视合并屈光参差的检出率为24.80%,以近视性和近视散光性屈光参差所占比例较高,分别为11.31%和8.09%. (2)屈光参差类型和屈光参差度对视力的影响差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),远视和远视散光性屈光参差对视力的影响较大,屈光参差度越大对视力的影响越大. (3)屈光参差度对立体视功能的影响差异有统计学意义(P<0.005),立体视锐度损害程度与屈光参差度相关.结论 间歇性外斜视较多合并近视性和近视散光性屈光参差,屈光参差度与视力、立体视功能密切相关.     

近视眼患者诱导屈光参差对视功能的影响

目的通过观察实验性屈光参差对40岁以上近视眼患者双眼视功能的影响,探讨老视患者的屈光手术治疗。方法对40岁以上近视患者48例用综合验光仪完全矫正其屈光不正后,在单眼前加不同度数正球镜,诱导单纯近视性( 0.5D、 1.0D、 1.5D、 2.0D、 2.5D和 3.0D)屈光参差。测定诱导屈光参差后的远视力、双眼同时视、融像功能、立体视情况。结果诱导的屈光参差超过 1.5D时,欠矫眼的远视力、立体视、融像功能和同时视随着屈光参差度数的增加逐渐下降。结论近视性屈光参差可引起中年近视患者双眼视功能异常,当屈光参差超过 1.5D时可引起双眼视功能急剧下降。大于40岁近视患者行屈光手术可留有小于 1.5D的近视性屈光参差,利于视近,且对高级视功能的影响不明显。     

Visual deficits in anisometropia

Amblyopia is usually associated with the presence of anisometropia, strabismus or both early in life. We set out to explore quantitative relationships between the degree of anisometropia and the loss of visual function, and to examine how the presence of strabismus affects visual function in observers with anisometropia. We measured optotype acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity in 84 persons with anisometropia and compared their results with those of 27 persons with high bilateral refractive error (isoametropia) and 101 persons with both strabismus and anisometropia. All subjects participated in a large-scale study of amblyopia (McKee et al., 2003). We found no consistent visual abnormalities in the strong eye, and therefore report only on vision in the weaker, defined as the eye with lower acuity. LogMAR acuity falls off markedly with increasing anisometropia in non-strabismic anisometropes, while contrast sensitivity is much less affected. Acuity degrades rapidly with increases in both hyperopic and myopic anisometropia, but the risk of amblyopia is about twice as great in hyperopic than myopic anisometropes of comparable refractive imbalance. For a given degree of refractive imbalance, strabismic anisometropes perform considerably worse than anisometropes without strabismus - visual acuity for strabismics was on average 2.5 times worse than for non-strabismics with similar anisometropia. For observers with equal refractive error in the two eyes there is very little change in acuity or sensitivity with increasing (bilateral) refractive error except for one extreme individual (bilaterally refractive error of -15 D). Most pure anisometropes with interocular differences less than 4 D retain some stereopsis, and the degree is correlated with the acuity of the weak eye. We conclude that even modest interocular differences in refractive error can influence visual function.     

弱视患者远、近视力差异的临床观察

目的  了解弱视儿童近视力和远视力是否存在差异。设计 回顾性病例系列。研究对象 弱视儿童81例（139眼）。方法 对81例初次就诊的弱视患者进行屈光矫正,分别运用标准对数远视力表和标准对数近视力表进行矫正后远、近视力的测量及分析。对所有接受检查的弱视儿童分别按年龄、屈光度和病因进行分组统计分析。主要指标 近视力,远视力。结果 不同病因弱视患者的远近视力比较：屈光不正性弱视、屈光参差性弱视、斜视性弱视患者的平均近视力分别为0.48±0.27、0.47±0.28、0.45±0.30,平均远视力分别为0.46±0.22、0.40±0.20、0.43±0.30,各组的远近视力差异均无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。不同年龄弱视患者的远近视力比较：3岁～≤5岁组、＞5岁～≤7岁组、＞7岁～12岁组的平均近视力分别为0.41±0.23、0.56±0.29、0.46±0.31,平均远视力分别为0.39±0.18、0.52±0.22、0.42±0.23,各年龄组患者的远近视力差异均无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。不同屈光度弱视患者的远近视力比较：≤+4.00 D组和＞+4.00 D组平均近视力分别为0.45±0.26、0.48±0.28,平均远视力为0.40±0.30、0.46±0.21,两组屈光度患者的近视力与远视力平均值差异均无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。结论 本研究结果显示,不同病因、不同年龄段、不同屈光度的弱视患者其远、近视力无明显差异。 （眼科,2013,22： 266-268）     

视力表的标准化

回顾了我国多年来视力表在设计、制作和使用中存在的问题,着重分析了目前使用最普遍的两种视力表《国际标准视力表》和《标准对数视力表》存在的问题。认为视力表视力检查是评价人眼主觉视力简便而实用的方法,它只对视觉功能做粗略的评估,简便和实用是其最大的特点。因此今后在设计和使用视力表时应考虑:①设计合理、简便实用、兼顾习惯、国际接轨、全国统一;②除有通用表外,另设计出供3岁左右儿童使用的视力表。建议国家标准局在业务主管部门(卫生部及中华医学会)协助下,组织视力表问题研究专题组,广泛征求意见与建议,提出规范统一的方案。     

角膜塑型术矫治近视性屈光参差

目的 :评价角膜塑型术矫治近视性屈光参差的效果。方法 :采用角膜塑型术按设计常规对 87例 (16 9眼 )近视性屈光参差患者进行矫治。结果 :裸眼远视力随戴镜时间延长而显著递增 ,近视度数与散光度数随着时间延长而显著递减 ,总有效率为 97.0 4 %。结论 :角膜塑型术是青少年近视性屈光参差的首选治疗方法 ,它可以克服屈光参差者戴框架眼镜时出现的物像差现象 ,能充分矫治屈光参差 ,达到双眼单视从而获得矫正视力的效果。     

Facilitation of amblyopia management by laser in situ keratomileusis in high anisometropic hyperopic and myopic children

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in facilitating amblyopia management of children from 6 to 14 years old, with high hyperopic and myopic anisometropia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, 42 children with high hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia and 32 children with high myopic anisometropic amblyopia underwent LASIK to reduce their anisometropia. LASIK was performed under topical or general anesthesia. Pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, and binocular vision were recorded. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 3 years, the averages of which were 17.45 months in the hyperopic group and 18.31 months in myopic group. RESULTS: Hyperopic anisometropia correction ranged from +3.50 D to +7.75 D, and the mean postoperative anisometropia was +0.56 +/- 0.75 D at 3 years. Myopic anisometropia correction ranged from -15.75 to -5.00 D and the mean postoperative anisometropia at 3 years was -2.20 +/- 1.05 D. The best-corrected visual acuity for distance and reading in the myopic group improved from 0.4 +/- 0.25 and 0.58 +/- 0.27, respectively, before surgery to 0.59 +/- 0.28 and 0.96 +/- 0.35, respectively, 3 years after surgery. In the hyperopic group, best-corrected visual acuity for distance and reading improved from 0.23 +/- 0.21 and 0.34 +/- 0.32, respectively, before surgery to 0.53 +/- 0.31 and 0.80 +/- 0.33, respectively, 3 years after surgery. The proportion of patients who had stereopsis increased from 19.1% preoperatively to 46.7% postoperatively in the hyperopic group and from 19% to 89% in the myopic group. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK reduced high hyperopic and myopic anisometropia in children, thus facilitating amblyopia management and improving their visual acuity and stereopsis.     

Contact lenses in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia

Poster at College Congress, Birmingham 2001.Oral presentation at European Strabismus Association, Florence 2001. PURPOSE: Anisometropia of more than one dioptre during the sensitive visual period may cause amblyopia. Its management requires refractive correction, and occlusion. Compliance with treatment is critical if visual improvement is to obtained. High anisometropia, poor initial acuity and mixed strabismic/anisometropia amblyopia are predictive factors for a poor outcome. We evaluated contact lens use in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of anisometropic amblyopia managed in a paediatric contact lens clinic (July 1996-July 2000), after standard amblyopia therapy of spectacles and occlusion therapy had been tried. Presenting age, acuity and refraction, duration of lens wear and occlusion, and final visual outcomes were noted. RESULTS: Seven children (four male, three female) presented at age 3.5-6 years (mean 4.5). Six had myopic anisometropia 6.0-18.4 dioptres (mean 10.4 dioptres) and one 6.75 dioptres hypermetropic anisometropia. The initial corrected acuities of the amblyopic eyes were 6/18 to 1/60. Five patients used contact lenses with a range from 5 months to 4 years. Final acuities were 6/12-1/60. Two myopes with 6 dioptres anisometropia improved three to four Snellen lines, one with 8.8 dioptres improved one line. Three with >10 dioptres anisometropia did not improve. The hypermetropic patient improved part of one Snellen line. CONCLUSIONS: High anisometropic amblyopia is challenging to treat. In our study contact lenses improved visual acuity in myopic anisometropia of up to 9 dioptres.     

Against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism as a predicting factor for the outcome of amblyopia treatment

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether with-the-rule (WTR) or against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism influences the treatment outcome of anisometropic amblyopia. DESIGN: A cohort study. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with unilateral amblyopia due to anisometropia without strabismus. Ninety-eight patients with simple, compound, mixed, oblique myopic, and hyperopic astigmatism were divided into seven groups based on the type of astigmatism. The groups were reviewed as to the amount of anisometropia, duration of occlusion, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after treatment. RESULTS: There was statistically significant longer duration of occlusion and less lines gain of BCVA among patients with hyperopic ATR astigmatism compared with patients with hyperopic WTR astigmatism (P =.0143 and P =.0000, respectively) and myopic ATR patients compared with myopic WTR patients (P =.0392 and P =.0192, respectively). For the same parameters, group differences were also statistically significant when all hyperopic or myopic simple/compound/mixed ATR patients were compared with all hyperopic or myopic simple/compound/mixed WTR patients (P =.0015 and P =.0000, respectively). CONCLUSION: The outcome of amblyopia treatment seems to be less favorable in patients with either hyperopic or myopic ATR astigmatism. Near vision impairment may be more amblyogenic than distance vision impairment during visual development.     

Evaluation of relationship of ocular parameters and depth of anisometropic amblyopia with the degree of anisometropia

PURPOSE: (1) To find out the relationship of the depth of amblyopia with the degree of anisometropia, in untreated cases of anisometropic amblyopia without strabismus, for both myopic and hypermetropic individuals. (2) To find out the relationship between various ocular parameters, such as axial length and corneal curvature, with the degree of anisometropia between the two eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January 2001 and March 2003, in 85 cases of untreated anisometropic amblyopia, who attended the author's out patient department. All these patients were subjected to a meticulous ocular examination, with special emphasis on (1) refraction under cycloplegia (2) best corrected visual acuity (3) measurement of axial length by A Scan (4) keratometry . The depth of amblyopia was calculated in two ways: (1) By finding out decimal visual acuity for each eye and subsequently calculating their difference. (2) By converting the Snellen acuity into Log MAR units, which was calculated by finding the Logarithm of the reciprocal of the decimal visual acuity for the two eyes, followed by calculating the difference between the two. The difference in refraction between the two eyes as a measure of anisometropia, was determined by the difference in spherical equivalent between the refraction for each eye. RESULTS: On comparing hypermetropic and myopic cases, a significant correlation was found between depth of amblyopia and the degree of anisometropia, in both myopic and hypermetropic patients. The correlation coefficients were however, found to be greater for hypermetropic than myopic individuals. It was observed that the difference between the axial length of the two eyes contributed to a major part of anisometropia, more so in myopic cases. CONCLUSIONS: The depth of amblyopia correlates with the degree of anisometropia in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia patients.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy versus conventional treatment of myopic anisometropic amblyopia in children

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for high myopic anisometropia with amblyopia and contact lens (CL) intolerance in children. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative study comprised 27 children with high myopic anisometropia and amblyopia. The mean age of the children was 5.4 years (range 4 to 7 years). Multizonal PRK (13 eyes) or LASEK (14 eyes) was performed in the more myopic eye under general anesthesia using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. After surgery, the dominant eye was patched. The postoperative visual and refractive outcomes were analyzed; all children had a 2-year follow-up. The 27 children (Group A) were compared with a control group of 30 children (mean age 5.1 years) (Group B) in whom myopic anisometropia and amblyopia were treated conventionally by CLs and patching the dominant eye. The visual acuity and binocular vision outcomes in both groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: In Group A, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -8.25 diopters (D) +/- 2.37 (SD) (range -6.00 to -11.25 D) preoperatively and -1.61 +/- 0.73 D (range +0.50 to -2.25 D) postoperatively. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.23 +/- 0.21 preoperatively and 0.78 +/- 0.19 at 2 years. In Group B, the mean BCVA was 0.16 +/- 0.19 at the start of CL correction and amblyopia therapy and improved to 0.42 +/- 0.15 after 2 years. The mean BCVA at the final examination was significantly better in Group A (P<.05). Binocular vision improvement expressed by the proportion of patients who gained fusion and stereopsis was better overall in Group A (78%) than in Group B (33%) (P<.05). There were no complications postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy and LASEK were effective and safe methods for correcting high myopic anisometropia and improving amblyopia in children aged 4 to 7 years who were CL intolerant. Visual acuity and binocular vision outcomes were better in children who received permanent surgical correction of anisometropia than in those who were treated conventionally by CLs.