Comparison of potency of ephedrine and mephentermine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in caesarean section

The dosages and potency of intravenous mephentermine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension are not available in English literature. This study was designed to determine the minimum effective dose (ED50) of mephentermine and to compare its potency with that of ephedrine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in parturients undergoing caesarean section. Dixon's up-down method of sequential allocation was used for vasopressor doses. Following administration of spinal anaesthesia, patients received a prophylactic infusion with 50 mg infused over a period of 30 minutes as the initial dose and dose intervals of 5 mg, of either ephedrine or mephentermine. The ED50 of ephedrine was 25.0 mg (95% CI 15.5 to 40.4 mg). For mephentermine, the up-down method was abandoned due to the success of the minimum dose possible but the ED50 appeared to be less than 5 mg. In conclusion, the minimum effective dose of mephentermine is much less than that of ephedrine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension. Another trial with a lower starting dose and smaller dose interval of mephentermine is required to determine the potency ratio of mephentermine and ephedrine.     

Avaliação comparativa entre metaraminol,fenilefrina e efedrina na profilaxia e no tratamento da hipotensão em cesarianas sob raquianestesia

Maternal hypotension is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, with deleterious effects on the fetus and mother. Among the strategies aimed at minimizing the effects of hypotension, vasopressor administration is the most efficient. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine, metaraminol, and ephedrine in the prevention and treatment of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Ninety pregnant women, not in labor, undergoing cesarean section were randomized into three groups to receive a bolus followed by continuous infusion of vasopressor as follows: phenylephrine group (50 μg + 50 μg/min); metaraminol group (0.25 mg + 0.25 mg/min); ephedrine group (4 mg + 4 mg/min). Infusion dose was doubled when systolic blood pressure decreased to 80% of baseline and a bolus was given when systolic blood pressure decreased below 80%. The infusion dose was divided in half when systolic blood pressure increased to 120% and was stopped when it became higher. The incidence of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, reactive hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, Apgar scores, and arterial cord blood gases were assessed at the 1st and 5th minutes.     

Rachianesthésie pour césarienne : la vitesse d'injection a-t-elle une influence sur l'incidence de l'hypotension ?

OBJECTIVE: To study effect of injection rate on spinal blockade and haemodynamic of spinal bupivacaine for Caesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective and randomized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective Caesarean section were randomized to receive either fast (20 seconds, group R, n=30) or slow (60 seconds, group L, n=30) spinal injection of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% associated with 25 microg of fentanyl and 100 microg of morphine. Sensory and motor blockade and haemodynamic parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Profiles of sensory and motor block were similar in both groups. Variations of arterial blood pressure and total dose of ephedrine were not different between R and L groups. However, the number of patient with systolic blood pressure lower than 100 mmHg were significantly lower in L group than in R group (p=0.04). Incidences of adverse effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Result of the present study suggests that a slow rate of injection would induce lower incidence of hypotension induced by spinal bupivacaine for Caesarean section.     

Prophylactic Angiotensin II Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery

Background: Angiotensin II may prove useful in treating regional anesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, because it causes less uterine vasoconstriction than do other vasoconstrictor drugs (such as phenylephrine). This study compared (1) maternal blood pressure and heart rate and (2) fetal status at delivery in parturients given either prophylactic angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.

Methods: Fifty-four women were randomized to receive either angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion intravenously during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section delivery. Simultaneous with subarachnoid injection, infusion of angiotensin II (2.5 [micro sign]g/ml) or ephedrine (5 mg/ml) was initiated at 10 ng [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 and 50 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1, respectively. The rate of each infusion was adjusted to maintain maternal systolic blood pressure at 90-100% of baseline.

Results: Cumulative vasopressor doses (mean +/- SD) through 10, 20, and 30 min were 150 +/- 100, 310 +/- 180, and 500 +/- 320 ng/kg in the angiotensin group and 480 +/- 210, 660 +/- 390, and 790 +/- 640 [micro sign]g/kg in the ephedrine group. Maternal heart rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) during vasopressor infusion in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin group. Umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and base excess were all significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the angiotensin group than in the ephedrine group.     

Prophylactic intravenous bolus ephedrine for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and optimal dose of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of maternal hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. METHODS: After patients had received an intravenous preload of 0.5 L of lactated Ringer's solution, spinal anaesthesia was administered in the sitting position with hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 mL 0.5% combined with 25 microg fentanyl. A total of 68 patients were randomized to receive a simultaneous 2 mL bolus intravenously of either 0.9% saline (Group C, n = 20), ephedrine 6 mg (Group E-6, n = 24), or ephedrine 12 mg (Group E-12, n = 22). Further rescue boluses of ephedrine 6 mg were given if systolic arterial pressure fell to below 90 mmHg, greater than 30% below baseline, or if symptoms suggestive of hypotension were reported. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher incidence of hypotension in Group C (60% patients) compared to Group E-12 (27%), but not in Group E-6 (50%). The 95% Confidence Interval for the difference in proportions between Groups C and E-12 was 6-60%, P < 0.05. Fewer rescue boluses of ephedrine were required in Group E-12 compared with Group C (1.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 3.3 +/- 2.1, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of maternal nausea or vomiting, or of neonatal acidaemia between groups. CONCLUSION: A prophylactic bolus of ephedrine 12 mg intravenously given at the time of intrathecal block, plus rescue boluses, leads to a lower incidence of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section compared to intravenous rescue boluses alone.     

Assessment of an updated double‐vasopressor automated system using Nexfin™ for the maintenance of haemodynamic stability to improve peri‐operative outcome during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

Hypotension occurs commonly during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, associated with maternal and fetal adverse effects. We developed a double‐vasopressor automated system with a two‐step algorithm and continuous non‐invasive haemodynamic monitoring using the Nexfin^? device. The system delivered 25 μg phenylephrine every 30 s when systolic blood pressure was between 90% and 100% of baseline, or 2 mg ephedrine at this blood pressure range and heart rate < 60 beats.min^?1; and 50 μg phenylephrine or 4 mg ephedrine when systolic blood pressure was < 90% of baseline with the same heart rate criterion. Fifty‐seven women received standardised spinal anaesthesia. Twenty‐seven (47.4%) had at least one reading of hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure < 80% baseline. Systolic blood pressure was within 20% of the baseline in a mean (SD) of 79.8 (20.9)% of measurements. Fifty‐three (93.0%) women required phenylephrine before delivery while 10 (17.5%) required ephedrine. Six women (10.5%) experienced nausea and three (5.3%) vomited. The system was able to achieve a low incidence of maternal hypotension with good maternal and fetal outcomes.     

Ephedrine and phenylephrine for avoiding maternal hypotension due to spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Effects on uteroplacental and fetal haemodynamics

The effects of i.v. vasopressors on Doppler velocimetry of the maternal uterine and placental arcuate arteries and the fetal umbilical, renal and middle cerebral arteries were studied during spinal anaesthesia in 19 healthy parturients undergoing elective caesarean section. Fetal myocardial function was investigated at the same time by M-mode echocardiography. The patients were randomized into two groups, to be given either ephedrine or phenylephrine as a prophylactic infusion supplemented with minor boluses if systolic arterial pressure decreased by more than 10 mmHg from the control value. Both the vasopressors restored maternal arterial pressure effectively. The ephedrine group showed no significant differences in any of the Doppler velocimetry recordings relative to the baseline values, but during the phenylephrine infusion the blood flow velocity waveform indices for the uterine and placental arcuate arteries increased significantly and vascular resistance decreased significantly in the fetal renal arteries. Healthy fetuses seem to tolerate these changes in uteroplacental circulation well, however, since the Apgar scores for the newborns and the acid-base values in the umbilical cord were within the normal range in both groups. The results suggest that some caution is required when selecting the specific vasopressor agent, the dosage and the mode of administration for the treatment of maternal hypotension secondary to spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.     

Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The hypotension following spinal anesthesia remains commonplace in cesarean delivery. Intrathecal opioids are synergistic with local anesthetics and intensify sensory block without increasing sympathetic block. The combination makes it possible to achieve spinal anesthesia with otherwise inadequate doses of local anesthetic. We hypothesized that this phenomenon could be used to provide spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery while incurring less frequent hypotension. METHODS: Thirty-two women scheduled for cesarean delivery were divided into 2 groups of patients who received a spinal injection of either 10 mg of isobaric (plain) bupivacaine 0.5% or 5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine with 25 microg fentanyl added. Each measurement of a systolic blood pressure less than 95 mm Hg or a decrease in systolic pressure of greater than 25% from baseline was considered as hypotension and treated with a bolus of 5 to 10 mg of intravenous ephedrine. RESULTS: Spinal block provided surgical anesthesia in all patients. Peak sensory level was higher (T3 v T4. 5) and motor block more intense in the plain bupivacaine group. The plain bupivacaine patients were more likely to require treatment for hypotension (94% v 31%) and had more persistent hypotension (4.8 v 0.6 hypotensive measurements per patient) than patients in the minidose bupivacaine-fentanyl group. Mean ephedrine requirements were 23.8 mg and 2.8 mg, respectively, for the 2 groups. Patients in the plain bupivacaine group also complained of nausea more frequently than patients in the minidose bupivacaine-fentanyl group (69% v 31%). CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 5 mg + fentanyl 25 microg provided spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with less hypotension, vasopressor requirements, and nausea than spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine.     

Randomised double‐blind comparison of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for treatment of hypotension in women with pre‐eclampsia undergoing caesarean section

Treatment of post‐spinal hypotension during caesarean section assumes special concern in pre‐eclamptic patients due to a compromised fetoplacental circulation and increased risk of placental hypoperfusion. Phenylephrine and ephedrine are the most commonly used vasopressors, although the best choice is still not clear. We studied 80 pre‐eclamptic women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent caesarean section with spinal anaesthesia, and who developed hypotension defined as a decrease in systolic arterial pressure ≥ 20% from baseline or absolute value < 100 mmHg. Women were randomly allocated to receive phenylephrine 50 μg or ephedrine 4 mg boluses for treatment of hypotension. Blood pressure changes following vasopressor administration were similar in both groups, but heart rate remained higher after ephedrine at all time‐points. The primary outcome measure of umbilical artery pH was 7.26 (0.11) in the phenylephrine group and 7.25 (0.09) in the ephedrine group (p = 0.86). The incidence of neonatal acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.20) was 9 (22.5%) in the phenylephrine group and 11 (27.5%) in the ephedrine group (p = 0.80). Other secondary outcome measures were comparable. In conclusion, phenylephrine 50 μg and ephedrine 4 mg, administered as intravenous boluses to treat post‐spinal hypotension during caesarean section in pre‐eclamptic patients, resulted in similar fetal acid‐base values, were equally effective in treating hypotension and were associated with good maternal and neonatal outcome.     

Phenylephrine added to prophylactic ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section

BACKGROUND: Because ephedrine infusion (2 mg/min) does not adequately prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the authors investigated whether adding phenylephrine would improve its efficacy. METHODS: Thirty-nine parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for cesarean delivery received a crystalloid preload of 15 ml/kg. Spinal anesthesia was performed using 11 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 2.5 microg sufentanil, and 0.1 mg morphine. Maternal heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured at frequent intervals. A vasopressor infusion was started immediately after spinal injection of either 2 mg/min ephedrine plus 10 microg/min phenylephrine or 2 mg/min ephedrine alone. Treatments were assigned randomly in a double-blind fashion. The infusion rate was adjusted according to systolic blood pressure using a predefined algorithm. Hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg and less than 80% of baseline, was treated with 6 mg ephedrine bolus doses. RESULTS: Hypotension occurred less frequently in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the ephedrine-alone group: 37% versus 75% (P = 0.02). Ephedrine (36+/-16 mg, mean +/- SD) plus 178+/-81 microg phenylephrine was infused in former group, whereas 54+/-18 mg ephedrine was infused in the latter. Median supplemental ephedrine requirements and nausea scores (0-3) were less in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group (0 vs. 12 mg, P = 0.02; and 0 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01, respectively). Umbilical artery pH values were significantly higher in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the group that received ephedrine alone (7.24 vs. 7.19). Apgar scores were similarly good in both groups. CONCLUSION: Phenylephrine added to an infusion of ephedrine halved the incidence of hypotension and increased umbilical cord pH.     

Glycopyrronium and hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section in women with relative bradycardia

The ability of glycopyrronium to reduce the severity of hypotension following subarachnoid block in parturients with a relative bradycardia was evaluated in a double-blind randomised controlled study. Women with a resting heart rate of < or = 80 beat x min(-1) presenting for elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive either glycopyrronium 2 microg x kg(-1) or normal saline intravenously once positioned for combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Following spinal injection of 2.6 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and fentanyl 15 microg, women randomly allocated to the saline group were given 6 mg ephedrine so that all parturients received some prophylaxis against hypotension other than the fluid preload. Further ephedrine and fluid boluses were administered if mean arterial pressure fell 20% or more from resting values. Using a sequential analysis technique, analysis after the first 20 subjects indicated the study should be stopped, with no difference in ephedrine requirements or hypotension between the groups. We conclude that pretreatment with glycopyrronium 2 microg x kg(-1) is no more effective than 6 mg ephedrine in preventing hypotension following subarachnoid block in parturients with relatively low resting heart rates.     

Prophylactic ephedrine and hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery

Hypotension commonly accompanies induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. To determine whether intravenous ephedrine prophylaxis would benefit prehydrated obstetrical patients presenting for elective cesarean section, we studied 30 patients randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups. All patients were preloaded with crystalloid (15 ml/kg), given spinal anesthesia and positioned with left uterine displacement (LUD). During induction, all patients received a 2 ml intravenous bolus and intravenous infusion of the study drug or placebo. The control group (n=10) received a saline bolus and saline infusion, the bolus group (n=10) received an ephedrine bolus (10 mg) and a saline infusion and the infusion group (n=10) received a saline bolus and a two-stage ephedrine infusion (20 mg over 12 min). After induction of anesthesia, systolic blood pressure decreased in the first 5 min in all groups. Hypotension occurred in 6/10 control patients, 5/10 bolus patients and 5/10 infusion patients. The amount of supplemental ephedrine required to treat hypotension did not differ among groups. Although the efficacy of ephedrine prophylaxis for hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section cannot be established by the small number of patients studied, this practice does not appear to be clinically relevant at the doses studied.     

Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia and simultaneous intravenous bolus of combined phenylephrine and ephedrine versus ephedrine for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND: Hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery can produce adverse maternal symptoms and neonatal acid-base effects. Single-agent prophylaxis, most notably with ephedrine, does not reliably prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension; recently, however, the prophylactic use of phenylephrine with ephedrine as an infusion was observed to be effective. We postulated that this combination, when given as an intravenous bolus for prophylaxis and rescue treatment, could be similarly effective. METHOD: Forty-three term parturients were randomized to receive a bolus of ephedrine 10 mg +/- phenylephrine 40 microg (groups E and EP, respectively) simultaneously with spinal anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg or a decrease of 20% from a baseline value. Rescue boluses comprised of ephedrine 5 mg +/- phenylephrine 20 microg. RESULTS: For groups E and EP, respectively, the incidence of hypotension was 80% vs. 95% (P=0.339), with the mean number of rescue boluses being 3.85+/-3.7 and 3.05+/-1.7 and the mean umbilical artery pH being 7.246+/-0.081 vs. 7.244+/-0.106. All comparisons were not significant (NS). CONCLUSION: The combination of ephedrine and phenylephrine given as an intravenous bolus at the doses selected is not superior to ephedrine alone in preventing or treating hypotension in healthy parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.     

Is ephedrine infusion more effective at preventing hypotension than traditional prehydration during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in African parturients?

BACKGROUND: Hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section may result in maternal nausea and vomiting and decreased uteroplacental blood flow with possible fetal acidaemia. Numerous methods have been tried to minimise hypotension. In developing countries where resources are limited, this study aimed to compare a standard infusion of ephedrine with traditional prehydration to prevent spinal hypotension. METHOD: Sixty patients for elective caesarean section were randomly allocated to group 1: 1 L 0.9% saline before spinal block, and group 2: infusion of ephedrine 30 mg in 1 L of 0.9% saline after spinal block, titrated to maternal systolic pressure. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with 2.5 mL of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine in the L3/L4 interspace. RESULTS: Systolic pressure decreased 5 min after spinal block. Group 2 had higher mean values of systolic pressure throughout most of the study period than group 1 (P < 0.05). Hypotension occurred in 70% of patients in group 1 and 40% of patients in group 2 (P = 0.037). Severe hypotension occurred in 40% of group 1 and 13.3% of group 2 (P = 0.039). Nausea was the most common side effect of hypotension, occurring in 39.4% of all hypotensive patients. Other complications, including hypertension, tachycardia and bradycardia were similar in the two groups. Neonatal outcome was similar in the two groups and median Apgar scores at one and five minutes were 8. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic ephedrine given by standard infusion set was more effective than crystalloid prehydration in the prevention of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.     

Phenylephrine Added to Prophylactic Ephedrine Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section

Background: Because ephedrine infusion (2 mg/min) does not adequately prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the authors investigated whether adding phenylephrine would improve its efficacy.

Methods: Thirty-nine parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for cesarean delivery received a crystalloid preload of 15 ml/kg. Spinal anesthesia was performed using 11 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 2.5 [mu]g sufentanil, and 0.1 mg morphine. Maternal heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured at frequent intervals. A vasopressor infusion was started immediately after spinal injection of either 2 mg/min ephedrine plus 10 [mu]g/min phenylephrine or 2 mg/min ephedrine alone. Treatments were assigned randomly in a double-blind fashion. The infusion rate was adjusted according to systolic blood pressure using a predefined algorithm. Hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg and less than 80% of baseline, was treated with 6 mg ephedrine bolus doses.

Results: Hypotension occurred less frequently in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the ephedrine-alone group: 37%versus 75% (P = 0.02). Ephedrine (36 +/-16 mg, mean +/- SD) plus 178 +/-81 [mu]g phenylephrine was infused in former group, whereas 54 +/-18 mg ephedrine was infused in the latter. Median supplemental ephedrine requirements and nausea scores (0-3) were less in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group (0 vs. 12 mg, P = 0.02; and 0 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01, respectively). Umbilical artery p H values were significantly higher in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the group that received ephedrine alone (7.24 vs. 7.19). Apgar scores were similarly good in both groups.     

Minidose Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Spinal Anesthesia for Surgical Repair of Hip Fracture in the Aged

Background: Spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the elderly is associated with a high incidence of hypotension. The synergism between intrathecal opioids and local anesthetics may make it possible to achieve reliable spinal anesthesia with minimal hypotension using a minidose of local anesthetic.

Methods: Twenty patients aged >= 70 yr undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture were randomized into two groups of 10 patients each. Group A received a spinal anesthetic of bupivacaine 4 mg plus fentanyl 20 [mu]g, and group B received 10 mg bupivacaine. Hypotension was defined as a systolic pressure of < 90 mmHg or a 25% decrease in mean arterial pressure from baseline. Hypotension was treated with intravenous ephedrine boluses 5-10 mg up to a maximum 50 mg, and thereafter by phenylephrine boluses of 100-200 [mu]g.

Results: All patients had satisfactory anesthesia. One of 10 patients in group A required ephedrine, a single dose of 5 mg. Nine of 10 patients in group B required vasopressor support of blood pressure. Group B patients required an average of 35 mg ephedrine, and two patients required phenylephrine. The lowest recorded systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures as fractions of the baseline pressures were, respectively, 81%, 84%, and 85%versus 64%, 69%, and 64% for group A versus group B.     

Preoperative dextrose does not affect spinalinduced hypotension in elective Cesarean section

PURPOSE: To determine if preoperative intravenous dextrose affects the incidence and ease of treatment of spinal-induced hypotension in parturients having elective Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind study, following informed consent, 119 ASA I, II parturients for elective Cesarean section were randomized to receive intravenously either dextrose 5% in normal saline (Group D) or normal saline (Group NS) at 125 ml x hr(-1) for two hours prior to delivery. Following a bolus of 15 ml x kg(-1) normal saline iv, spinal anesthesia was induced with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75%, fentanyl and morphine. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg or >20% decrease) was treated with fluids and/or vasopressor. Data collected: demographics, blood glucose concentrations (fasting, time of spinal, delivery), blood pressure (baseline, one minute intervals from spinal to delivery), neonatal Apgar scores, umbilical blood gas analyses, glucose and lactate concentrations. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in the rate of hypotension (P = 0.272). All parturients who experienced hypotension received fluids, and there was also no difference between the groups in vasopressor requirement [mean dose of ephedrine: Group D = 21.6 mg (95% CI 15.1-28.2), Group NS = 16 mg (95% CI 12.0-20.5)]. CONCLUSION: The routine administration of dextrose 5% at a rate of 5.22 g x hr(-1) preoperatively does not affect the hypotension rate, or make it easier to treat.     

麻黄碱及甲氧明用于剖宫产腰麻低血压的防治

目的比较麻黄碱与甲氧明用于剖宫产腰麻低血压的防治效果。方法 90例择期腰麻剖宫产产妇随机分为三组,当腰麻后血压低于80%基础值时分别静注麻黄碱12 mg(E组)、甲氧明2 mg(M组)或麻黄碱6 mg+甲氧明1 mg(EM组)。观察各组产妇腰麻后血流动力学变化,测定胎儿取出后脐动脉血气值。结果三组SBP差异无明显统计学意义。HR<60次/分的产妇M组11例(23.3%),显著多于E组的0例和EM组的1例(3.3%)(P<0.05);HR>100次/分的产妇E组11例(36.7%),显著多于M组(0例)及EM组(0例)(P<0.05)。胎儿娩出后1、5 min的Apgar评分三组间差异无统计学意义。脐动脉pH值E组显著低于M组及EM组(P<0.05);脐动脉BE值E组显著高于M组及EM组(P<0.05)。结论麻黄碱与甲氧明单独或联合均可有效防治剖宫产腰麻后低血压发生,但麻黄碱与甲氧明联合使血流动力学更稳定,甲氧明单用与甲氧明与麻黄碱联合应用使胎儿酸碱平衡更稳定。     

Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomised comparison of Oxford, lateral and sitting positions

Maternal position during induction of intrathecal anaesthesia for caesarean section influences block height and haemodynamic stability. In a randomised study of 90 women presenting for elective caesarean section using combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia, three positions were compared--the Oxford position (group O), the right lateral to supine wedged (group R) and the sitting to supine wedged (group S). Hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg with fentanyl 12.5 microg was injected intrathecally using a needle-through-needle CSE technique. Intravenous ephedrine 6 mg was given every minute that systolic blood pressure fell below 80% of baseline. Time required for block height to reach T5 as assessed by light touch, was similar in the three groups. There were no significant differences in blood pressure although ephedrine requirements were less in group R. There were no significant differences in the incidence of maternal nausea and vomiting or in neonatal outcome as assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. Although the study failed to show any significant differences in block height between the groups, no women in group O had a block above T2 compared with three in group R and three in group S.     

Manual displacement of the uterus during Caesarean section

Ninety ASA 1 and 2 pregnant women with term singleton pregnancies and no maternal and fetal complications, scheduled for elective or emergency Caesarean section, were randomly allocated to group LT (15 degrees left lateral table tilt, n = 45) and group MD (leftward manual displacement, n = 45). Subarachnoid block was established with a 25-gauge spinal needle at the L3-L4 interspace using 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. A median sensory level of T6 was observed in both groups but the incidence of hypotension was markedly lower in group MD when compared to group LT (4.4% vs 40%; p < 0.001) with a significant reduction in mean (SD) ephedrine requirement (6 (0) vs 11.3 (4.9) mg; p < 0.001). The mean (SD) fall in systolic blood pressure was 28.8 (7.3) mmHg in group LT and 20 (12.7) mmHg in group MD. The time to maximum fall in systolic blood pressure was similar in both groups (4.5 min). We conclude that manual displacement of the uterus effectively reduces the incidence of hypotension and ephedrine requirements when compared to 15 degrees left lateral table tilt in parturients undergoing Caesarean section.