Stereotactic radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy boost (SRB) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) by comparing two different regimens, single dose or fractionated treatment. Between December 1994 and January 2000, 24 patients with GBM were treated with SRB in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Fourteen patients (58%) were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 10 patients (42%) with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Median interval between EBRT and SRS or FSRT was 1.4 months (range -0.4-3.9 months). Actuarial survival rates of the entire 24 patients at one and two years following SRB were 63% and 34% respectively, with median survival time of 16 months. Variables predicting survival were age, extent of surgery, re-operation and the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) classes based on recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). In comparison to historical controls, improved survival benefit after SRB was observed. The median survival times for the RTOG classes 4, 5, and 6 were 28.3, 10.3, and 6.0 months following EBRT+SRB, respectively. Expected values for these classes after EBRT are 11.1, 8.9, and 4.6 months, respectively. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the RTOG class 4. There was no difference in survival between SRS and FSRT treated groups. Late complications developed in 4 patients in the SRS group and 1 patients in the FSRT group. Our retrospective data suggest that SRB in conjunction with EBRT may improve survival in patients with GBM with median survival time of 16 months, when compared to historical controls of the RTOG data following EBRT. The addition of SRB appeared to improve the median survival most demonstrably in RTOG RPA class 4 patients. SRS and FSRT are equally effective with similar median survival, but potentially less late complications associated with FSRT. Since this is a nonrandomized study, further investigation is needed to confirm this and to determine an optimal dose/fractionation scheme.     

Single-arm, open-label phase II study of intravenously administered tirapazamine and radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of tirapazamine (Sanofi Synthelabo Research, Malvern, PA), a bioreductive agent, in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The patients were staged according to a model constructed by a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of glioma patients in prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials and compared with a matched standard population, as predicted by the model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients diagnosed with a GBM were treated with radiation therapy and intravenous tirapazamine between January 27,1995, and April 25,1997. All patients received 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Tirapazamine was delivered three times a week for 12 treatments during radiotherapy. Fifty-five patients received tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2). A second dose level, 260 mg/m(2), was opened, and 69 patients were entered. RESULTS: There was no significant survival advantage to the drug in any RPA class at either dose level. The median survival time was 10.8 months for the patient population treated with the 159-mg/m(2) dose of tirapazamine and 9.5 months for the group treated with the 260-mg/m (2) dose of tirapazamine. Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2) were 27.4 months (class III), 10.8 months (class IV), 7.9 months (class V), and 3.8 months (class VI). Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 260 mg/m(2) were 16.2 months (class III), 10.3 months (class IV), 5. 1 months (class V), and 1.3 months (class VI). Patients in RPA class III treated in the 159 mg/m(2) dose arm had a notably longer survival than patients in the RTOG database RPA class III, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no fatal toxicities. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent at the higher dose level. CONCLUSION: Survival in the population treated with radiation and tirapazamine was equivalent to the control population. Patients in RPA class III treated with radiation and tirapazamine at the 159-mg/m(2) dose had a longer survival when compared with the historical controls. The improvement in survival did not reach statistical significance. Toxicity was acceptable in both treatment arms, but grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the higher dose regimen.     

Survival of patients treated with radiation therapy for anaplastic astrocytoma

Background

Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) represents 7% of primary brain tumors in adults. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors are thought to be predictive of survival. We retrospectively assessed the association of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors with survival in AA treated with radiotherapy (RT) at our institution.

Patients and methods.

Medical records of patients with AA treated with RT between 1987 and 2007 were reviewed. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were recorded and used to assign patients to a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG RPA) classification. First use of chemotherapy was recorded. Log-rank tests and Cox regression models were used to assess for an association of patient-, tumor- and treatment-related factors with survival.

Results

One-hundred twenty-six patients were eligible for study. Median age, Karnofsky performance status, and duration of symptoms were 43 years, 90, and 8 weeks. Median radiation dose was 59.4 Gy; 61% of patients underwent tumor resection, and 17% and 41% of patients received temozolomide during and after RT. Median survival was 31 months, and 2-year survival was 58%. RTOG RPA class was associated with survival (p < 0.001), but use of temozolomide during or after RT was not (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

In this retrospective study with inherent limitations, RTOG RPA classification was associated with survival. Further studies are necessary to confirm or refute this finding.     

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II dose escalation clinical trial

PURPOSE: A prospective Phase I/II dose escalation study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MTD would be reached via a dose escalation study. After 42 Gy/21 fractions, 4.2 weeks by conventional fractionated irradiation through anteroposterior/posteroanterior fields, the 3D-CRT technique was used as boost. The planned total dose escalation depended on lung volume irradiated. According to the percentage of lung volume receiving >20 Gy, the patients were divided into three subgroups (i.e., <25%, 25%-37%, and >37%). The scheduled dose escalation began with 69 Gy and continued to 78 Gy. The boost doses were delivered at 3 Gy per fraction, once per day, five fractions per week. Each dose level includes 5 patients. Besides radiotherapy, all patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with MVP regimen (Mitomycin, Vindesine, cis-platium). The criterion for stopping further dose escalation was > or =20% of patients with > or =RTOG Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. RESULTS: Between June 1999 and February 2001, 50 patients had been enrolled in this study, including 4 with Stage II disease, 31 with Stage IIIa disease, and 15 with Stage IIIb disease. The dose escalation plan has been completed. All subgroups reached the highest predetermined dose levels (i.e., 78 Gy for the <25% subgroup, 78 Gy for the 25-37% subgroup, and 75 Gy for the >37% subgroup). Although none of the subgroups developed more than 20% of >/=Grade 3 acute pneumonitis, dose escalation was terminated because long-term follow-up was needed to observe late complications. Median follow-up time (MFT) for the entire group was 18 months (6-37 months). The most common acute complication was esophagitis in 56% of patients with RTOG Grade 1-2, and in 4% with Grade 3. Acute radiation pneumonitis developed in 36% of patients with RTOG Grade 1-2. Only 1 patient had Grade 3 pneumonitis, which was in the 25-37% subgroup at 75 Gy. The hematopoietic toxicity appeared in 58% of patients with Grade 1-2, and 8% with Grade 3. As to late complications, only 30% of patients developed pulmonary fibrosis of RTOG Grade 1-2. The median survival time for the entire group was 18 months. Two-year overall survival, locoregional progression-free rate, and distant metastasis rate were 44%, 40%, and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although MFT was 18 months, it had not yet been declared because a longer follow-up was needed to observe the late complications. The 2-year overall survival of 44% was very encouraging and implied that 3D-CRT combined with chemotherapy would improve the outcome for locally advanced NSCLC.     

Survival following CyberKnife radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

Current therapeutic goals for treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) involve gross total resection followed by multifractionated focal external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Patients treated with optimal therapy have a median survival of approximately 12-15 months. In the present study, we sought to determine whether a hypofractionated dosing schedule using CyberKnife is at least as effective as multifractionated focal EBRT. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 histopathologically confirmed GBM patients treated with CyberKnife at Okayama Kyokuto Hospital in Japan after gross total resection (n=11), subtotal resection (n=8), or biopsy (n=1). Eight patients also received adjuvant ACNU and Vincrisitine chemotherapy according to local protocol; however, no patient received any other form of radiation besides post surgical/biopsy CyberKnife treatment. The treated tumor volumes ranged from 9.62 cm(3)-185.81 cm(3) (mean: 86.08 cm(3)). The marginal dose (D90) ranged from 19.99 Gy-41.47 Gy (mean: 34.58 Gy) with a maximum mean dose of 43.99 Gy (range: 23.33 Gy-56.89 Gy). The prescribed isodose line ranged from 50.38%-85.68% with a mean of 79.25%. Treatment was delivered in 1-8 fractions (mean: 5.65). Patients were followed from 2-36 months (mean: 16.45 months). Overall median survival was 16 months with 55% of patients alive at 12 months and 34% of patients alive at 24 months. Median survival of patients in Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) classes III or IV was 32 months versus 12 months for those in RPA class V. Median survival for patients who received gross total resection was 36 months versus 8 months for those who underwent subtotal resection or biopsy. The results of this study using CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated radiotherapy compared favorably to historic data using focal EBRT in newly diagnosed post surgical GBM patients. A larger prospective analysis that compares CyberKnife SRS and hypofractionated radiotherapy to focal EBRT is warranted.     

Phase III randomized study of radiotherapy plus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine with or without BUdR for treatment of anaplastic astrocytoma: final report of RTOG 9404

PURPOSE: This study was an open-label, randomized Phase III trial in newly diagnosed patients with anaplastic glioma other than glioblastoma multiforme comparing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plus adjuvant procarbazine, cyclohexylchloroethylnitrosurea (lomustine), and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy with or without bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) given as a 96-h infusion each week of RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Only patients 18 years or older with newly diagnosed anaplastic glioma were eligible. A central pathology review was accomplished for most patients, but was not mandated before registration. The study had initially opened as a Northern California Oncology Group trial in 1991, becoming an Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), Southwestern Oncology Group and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group study in July 1994. A total accrual of 293 patients was planned for the sample size, using survival as the primary end point. The experimental arm (RT/BUdR + PCV) was to be compared with the control arm (RT + PCV) using a one-sided alpha = 0.05, with a power of 85% for detecting an increase in median survival from 160 to 240 weeks, assuming a 3-year follow-up after enrollment completion. RESULTS: Between July 1994 and August 1996, 134 patients were randomized to EBRT + PCV (non-BUdR patients) and 134 to EBRT/BUdR + PCV (BUdR patients). The study was closed before the full-anticipated accrual on the basis of an interim analysis that predicted no survival benefit for the BUdR arm. Of the 268 patients, 41 and 37, respectively, were ineligible or canceled primarily on the basis of the central pathology review findings. Thus, 93 patients and 97 patients were eligible/analyzable in the non-BUdR and BUdR arms, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced in both arms, with most <50 years old and in the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class I category. The minimal potential follow-up was 4.6 years. The median survival for non-BUdR patients was 4.1 years compared with 4.6 years for the BUdR patients (p = 0.61). The 4-year overall survival rate was 51% in both arms. For RPA Class I patients (the best prognostic class), the median survival had not been reached for non-BUdR patients (4-year survival rate 61%) and was 5.6 years for BUdR patients (4-year survival rate 64%; p = 0.91). Each arm was also compared with the RTOG historical database for RPA Class I patients with no statistically significant difference found in overall survival (BUdR vs. historical, p = 0.31 and non-BUdR vs. historical, p = 0.48). Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 15 and 17 patients in the non-BUdR and BUdR arms, respectively, with one treatment-related death in the BUdR group. CONCLUSION: No survival advantage was noted by adding BUdR to EBRT and PCV in this patient population     

Misonidazole and radiotherapy to treat malignant glioma: A phase II trial of the radiation therapy oncology group

Fifty-four patients with Grade III or IV malignant glioma were treated with the hypoxic-cell radiosensitizer misonidazole, and radiation therapy (RT) in a Phase II trial of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The median survival was 39 weeks. Toxicity was acceptable. Almost all toxicities were reversible and self-limited. The were no significant changes in hematologic, hepatic or renal parameters. The median survival obtained is similar to the results with conventional radiotberapy. A Phase III trial is under way comparing standard radiation and BCNU chemotherapy (1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea) with sensitized radiation and chemotherapy (RT + misonidazole + BCNU). Additive toxicity between misonidazole and BCNU was not observed in a pilot group.     

Phase II, two-arm RTOG trial (94-11) of bischloroethyl-nitrosourea plus accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (64.0 or 70.4 Gy) based on tumor volume (> 20 or ≤ 20 cm, respectively) in the treatment of newly-diagnosed radiosurgery-ineligible glioblastoma multiforme patients

Purpose: To compare survivorship, and acute and delayed toxicities following radiation therapy (RT) of radiosurgery-ineligible glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with tumor volume-influenced, high-dose accelerated, hyperfractionated RT plus bischloroethyl-nitrosourea (BCNU), using prior RTOG malignant glioblastoma patients as historical controls.

Methods and Materials: One hundred four of 108 patients accrued from June 1994 through May 1995 from 26 institutions were analyzable. Patients were histologically confirmed with GBM, and previously untreated. Treatment assignment (52 patients/arm) was based on tumor mass (TM), defined as the product of the maximum diameter and greatest perpendicular dimension of the titanium-gadolinium-enhanced postoperative MRI: Arm A, 64 Gy, TM > 20 cm²; or Arm B, 70.4 Gy, TM ≤ 20 cm². Both Arms A and B received BCNU (80 mg/m², under hyperhydration) days 1–3, 56–58, then 4 cycles, each 8 weeks, for a total of 6 treatment series.

Results: During the 24 months immediately post-treatment, the overall median survival was 9.1 months in Arm A (64 Gy) and 11.0 months in Arm B (70.4 Gy). Median survival in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class III/IV was 10.4 months in Arm A and 12.2 months in Arm B, while RPA Class V/VI was 7.6 months in Arm A and 6.1 months in Arm B. There were no grade 4 neurological toxicities in Arm A; 2 grade 4 neurological toxicities were observed in Arm B (1 motor deficit, 1 necrosis at 157 days post-treatment).

Conclusion: This strategy of high-dose, accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy shortens overall RT treatment times while allowing dose escalation, and it provides the potential for combination with currently available, as well as newer, chemotherapy agents. Survival is comparable with previously published RTOG data, and toxicities are within acceptable limits.     

Age as an independent prognostic factor in patients with glioblastoma: a radiation therapy oncology group and American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base comparison

Glioblastoma (GBM) is rare in early adulthood and little information is available on this subgroup. We investigated whether young age (18-30 years) had an independent effect on survival. We retrospectively reviewed patients from two large databases: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). In the RTOG evaluation, we analyzed all eligible GBM cases from 17 RTOG studies from 1974 to 2002. All patients with GBM during 1985-1998 in the NCDB were examined for comparison. Patients were divided into three cohorts: ages 18-30, 31-49, and ≥50. Overall survival, as a function of age (discreet and continuous), was assessed. The RTOG review included 3,136 patients: 112 (3.6%) were 18-30, 780 (24.9%) were 31-49, and 2,244 (71.6%) were ≥50. The median survival times of the three groups were 21.0, 13.5, and 9.1 months (P < 0.0001). Significant improvement in survival for younger patients was demonstrated with adjustment for recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. Of the 37,260 patients analyzed in the NCDB, 796 (2.1%) were 18-30, 5,711 (15.3%) were 31-49, and 30,753 (82.5%) were ≥50. The median survival times of the three groups were 18.0, 12.8, and 6.3 months (P < 0.0001). Data were not available for RPA class from this series. GBM is rare in young adulthood, comprising 2.1-3.6% of our patients. They have superior survival, even when adjusted for RPA class. More investigations on the unique biologic and clinical characteristics of tumors in this population are needed.     

Phase 2 trial of radiation plus high-dose tamoxifen for glioblastoma multiforme: RTOG protocol BR-0021

Preclinical studies support the concept that inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) by tamoxifen (TAM) should provide both antineoplastic effects and radiosensitization. High-dose TAM (80 mg/m2 p.o. daily in divided doses) was given with and after conventional radiotherapy (XRT) to inhibit PKC-mediated signaling, which is known to be enhanced in glioblastoma (GBM). Seventy-seven patients were accrued between December 2000 and December 2001; two were ineligible and not included in the efficacy results. Pretreatment characteristics of the patients included the following: 52% were less than 60 years of age, 39% had a Zubrod score of 0, 70% had minor or no neurological symptoms, and 65% were Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-recursive partition analysis (RPA) class III and IV. Eighty-six percent of patients achieved acceptable dosing of TAM. Notable toxicity included late radiation grade 3 in two patients and thromboembolic events in 16 patients (two grade 2, 10 grade 3, three grade 4, and one grade 5), for an incidence of 20.8% (which is lower than expected, based on the literature for deep vein thrombophlebitis in GBM patients not receiving TAM). Median survival time (MST) was 9.7 months as compared (by three different statistical methodologies) to the historical GBM control database of 1457 RPA class III, IV, and V drug/XRT-treated patients. After controlling for RPA class IV, the MST was 11.3 months, which compares to the historical RPA control of 11.3 months (P = 0.37). The results obtained do not exhibit a substantial advance over those of previous studies with various XRT/drug doublets, including BCNU. However, as TAM does not have significant overlapping toxicities with most other drugs, its testing in a combined modality approach with other medications may be justified in future clinical trials. Historically, the incidence of thromboembolic events in GBM patients is approximately 30%. The lower-than-expected incidence seen here has also been observed in other high-dose TAM GBM studies. We speculate that TAM inhibited the PKC-mediated phosphorylation of coagulation factors.     

Results of the whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer: the RTOG RPA intra-classes analysis

We evaluated the overall survival with respect to prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer in order to assess the RTOG RPA (Recursive Partitioning Analysis) classification value and to perform intra-classes analyses including pretreatment and treatment-related variables. Between 1986 and 1997, 322 consecutive patients with BM from lung cancer were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Patients' distribution according to the RTOG RPA classes was: Class 1--13%, Class 2--67% and Class 3--20%. Prognostic value of the following variables was tested: RTOG RPA classes, performance status, age, extracranial metastases, control of the primary tumour, gender, histology, number of BM and interval from diagnosis to the development of BM. Intra-classes analyses were performed including radiation dose and surgery of BM. Median survival was 4.0 months. Median survival for RTOG RPA classes 1, 2 and 3 were 5.2, 4.0 and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.003). Extracranial metastases, performance status, control of the primary and RTOG RPA classes were prognostic for survival. Within class 2 higher radiation dose, female, no extracranial metastases and surgery of BM were related to the improved survival. RTOG RPA classes maintain their prognostic significance for patients with BM from lung cancer not participating in clinical trials.     

Implant volume as a prognostic variable in brachytherapy decision-making for malignant gliomas stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis.

PURPOSE: When an initial retrospective review of malignant glioma patients (MG) undergoing brachytherapy was carried out using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) criteria, it revealed that glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cases benefit the most from implant. In the present study, we focused exclusively on these GBM patients stratified by RPA survival class and looked at the relationship between survival and implanted target volume, to distinguish the prognostic value of volume in general and for a given GBM class. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 1998, 75 MG patients were treated with surgery, external beam radiation, and stereotactic iodine-125 (I-125) implant. Of these, 53 patients (70.7%) had GBMs, with 52 (98%) having target volume (TV) data for analysis. Stratification by RPA criteria showed 12, 26, 13, and 1 patients in classes III to VI, respectively. For analysis purposes, classes V and VI were merged. There were 27 (51.9%) male and 25 (48.1%) female patients. Mean age was 57.5 years (range 14-79). Median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90 (range 50-100). Median follow-up time was 11 months (range 2-79). RESULTS: At analysis, 18 GBM patients (34.6%) were alive and 34 (65.4%) were dead. Two-year and 5-year survivals were 42% and 17.5%, respectively, with a median survival time (MST) of 16 months. Two-year survivals and MSTs for the implanted GBM patients compared to the RTOG database were as follows: 74% vs. 35% and 28 months vs. 17.9 months for class III; 32% vs. 15% and 16 months vs. 11.1 months for class IV; 29% vs. 6% and 11 months vs. 8.9 months for class V/VI. Mean implanted TV was 15.5 cc (range 0.8-78), which corresponds to a spherical implant diameter of 3.1 cm. Plotting survival as a function of 5-cc TV increments suggested a trend toward poorer survival as the implanted volume increases. The impact of incremental changes in TV on survival within a given RPA class of GBMs was compared to the RTOG database. Looking at absolute differences in MSTs: for classes III and IV, there was little effect of different TVs on survival; for class V/VI, a survival benefit to implantation was still seen at the target volume cutoff (TV > 25 cc). Within a given RPA class, no significant differences were found within class III; for class IV, the most significant difference was at 10 cc (p = 0.05); and for class V/VI, at 20 cc (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: For all GBM patients, an inverse relationship between implanted TV size and median survival is suggested by this study. However, when GBM patients are stratified using the RTOG's RPA criteria, the prognostic effect of implant volume disappears within each RPA survival class. At the critical volume of 25 cc, which approximates an implant of 5-cm diameter (upper implantation limit of many CNS brachytherapy protocols), the "poorest" prognosis GBM patients stratified by RPA still demonstrate a survival benefit with implant. We suggest that any GBM patient meeting brachytherapy recognized size criteria be considered for I-125 implant.     

Intraoperative and conformal external-beam radiation therapy with protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is widely used for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy with more intensive radiotherapy in these patients, using a combination of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), conformal external-beam radiaotherapy (EBRT), and protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Thirty patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled in this Phase II study. The treatment consisted of IORT (25 grays [Gy]), followed by EBRT (40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 times per week), and concurrent protracted 5-FU infusion (200 mg/m(2)), beginning 2-4 weeks after IORT. The authors evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of this treatment by following up patients for 12.0-28.1 months. Survival from the date of IORT was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In 11 of the 30 patients, metastatic spread was detected in the abdominal cavity at laparotomy. The full EBRT dose was administered in 28 of the 30 patients. Of the remaining 2 patients, EBRT was terminated at 8 Gy due to progression of brain metastasis and another patient did not receive EBRT or chemotherapy due to massive ascites after IORT. The overall response rate for primary pancreatic tumor on dynamic computed tomography scan was 23.3% (7 partial responses). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) was observed in 15 of the 28 patients who received the full irradiation dose (53.6%). These included anorexia, nausea, emesis, fatigue, leukopenia, and/or elevation of transaminase levels. There were no directly treatment-related deaths, but 1 patient died of hepatic failure related to late effects of irradiation after 25.6 months. The median survival time of the 30 patients was 7.8 months and the 2-year survival rate was 8.1%. The median survival time of the 19 patients without metastatic spread in the abdominal cavity was 12.9 months and that of the 11 patients with metastatic spread was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The present regimen of chemoradiotherapy is not superior to conventional chemoradiotherapy (EBRT and 5-FU) for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.     

A phase II trial of accelerated radiotherapy using weekly stereotactic conformal boost for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: RTOG 0023

PURPOSE: This phase II trial was performed to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of dose-intense accelerated radiation therapy using weekly fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM with postoperative enhancing tumor plus tumor cavity diameter <60 mm were enrolled. A 50-Gy dose of standard radiation therapy (RT) was given in daily 2-Gy fractions. In addition, patients received four FSRT treatments, once weekly, during Weeks 3 to 6. FSRT dosing of either 5 Gy or 7 Gy per fraction was given for a cumulative dose of 70 or 78 Gy in 29 (25 standard RT + 4 FSRT) treatments over 6 weeks. After the RT course, carmustine (BCNU) at 80 mg/m(2) was given for 3 days, every 8 weeks, for 6 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were analyzed. Toxicity included: 3 Grade 4 chemotherapy, 3 acute Grade 4 radiotherapy, and 1 Grade 3 late. The median survival time was 12.5 months. No survival difference is seen when compared with the RTOG historical database. Patients with gross total resection (41%) had a median survival time of 16.6 months vs. 12.0 months for historic controls with gross total resection (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: This first, multi-institutional FSRT boost trial for GBM was feasible and well tolerated. There is no significant survival benefit using this dose-intense RT regimen. Subset analysis revealed a trend toward improved outcome for GTR patients suggesting that patients with minimal disease burden may benefit from this form of accelerated RT.     

Phase II study of topotecan plus cranial radiation for glioblastoma multiforme: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9513

PURPOSE: A Phase II trial was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) to compare the survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with topotecan combined with standard cranial radiotherapy (RT) for matched patients treated in prior RTOG studies. A secondary objective was to document the acute and late toxicities of this combination of chemotherapy and RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-seven patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma multiforme received standard cranial RT (60 Gy/30 fractions in 6 weeks) plus topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 per day i.v. for 5 d/wk every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Eighty-four patients were evaluated, of whom 60 (71%) were > or =50 years, 44 (52%) were men, and 61 (73%) had a Karnofsky performance status of > or =80. Twenty-nine percent of patients had undergone biopsies, 48% partial resections, and 21% gross total resections. Two resections were unspecified as to the extent of tumor removal. Fourteen percent of patients were recursive partitioning analysis Class III, 46% were Class IV, 35% were Class V, and 5% were Class VI. RESULTS: The median survival was 9.3 months. Sixty-seven patients (80%) had progression. The 1-year survival rate was 32%. One patient remained alive without recurrence. RTOG 9513 patients were matched with patients in an RTOG clinical trial database from previous clinical trials. The matching variables were age, Karnofsky performance status, mental status, and prior surgery. No statistically significant difference was found between the survival of the study patients and that of the matched patients from the RTOG database. Fifty-four percent of patients had Grade IV acute toxicity. The toxicity was primarily hematologic. Four patients had Grade III late central nervous system toxicities. CONCLUSION: Topotecan administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 per day i.v. for 5 d/wk every 3 weeks for 3 cycles given concurrently with standard cranial RT for glioblastoma does not produce a statistically significant survival advantage over previously tested therapies. Other methods of administration of topotecan or other camptothecins may provide more effective radiosensitization.     

A phase II trial of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy for patients with malignant gliomas

Standard treatment for GBM is radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is synergistic with RT based on several mechanisms of action previously identified, however not tested herein. The MTD of ATO, RT and TMZ was determined in a Phase I trial. We now present the combined Phase I/II data. Patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas were eligible for treatment. Patients were treated with RT (60 GY), TMZ (75 mg/m² daily?×?42 days) and ATO 0.20 mg/kg daily in week 1 then twice a week ×5 weeks, after completing RT they were treated with TMZ 5/28 for up to 12 months. MRIs were performed every 8 weeks. A total of 42 patients were enrolled in both the Phase I and II trials for this study treatment. Of the 42 enrolled patients (24 M and 18 W) the median age was 54 (24–80) and median KPS 90 (60–100). 28 patients had a GBM and 14 had anaplastic glioma (AG). All patients completed RT/TMZ/ATO and went on to maintenance TMZ. Median number of post RT cycles of TMZ was 4 (0–12). Median PFS was 7 m for GBM and 75 m for AG and median OS was 17 m for GBM and NR for AG. Best response was CR in 2, SD in 28, PR in 5 and PD in 7. There were no unexpected adverse events. Grade 3 toxicities likely attributable to ATO included prolonged Qtc (n?=?1), elevated liver enzymes (n?=?2 for ALT/n =?1 for AST) and elevated bilirubin (n?=?1). Adding ATO to RT and TMZ is feasible with no increased side effects. The addition of arsenic did not improve overall survival in the GBM patients as compared to historic data. MGMT status was analyzed in 20 of the 42 patients where tissue was available for retrieval and MGMT testing.     

Effect of dalteparin and radiation on survival and thromboembolic events in glioblastoma multiforme: a phase II ECOG trial

Laboratory and clinical studies support the concept that heparins, particularly the low molecular component, may serve as an inhibitor of angiogenesis, providing anti-neoplastic effects. Further, treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may provide prophylaxis for thromboembolic events (TEE), in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Dalteparin (5,000 U sub-Q daily) was given with and after conventional radiotherapy to newly diagnosed GBM patients. Forty-five patients were accrued between 5/02 and 9/04; 3 were ineligible. At time of progression, patients could continue dalteparin in addition to standard regimens. Pretreatment characteristics included: median age 61 (range 26-78); ECOG Performance status: 0 = 38%, 1 = 57%, 2 = 5%; gross total resection 45%. There were no grade 3/4 bleeding or thrombocytopenic events, and no TEE occurred while on dalteparin. Median time on dalteparin was 6.3 months, median time to progression was 3.9 months; median survival was 11.9 months. There was no significant improvement in survival when compared to the RTOG GBM database (with various radiation/drug doublets including BCNU) using recursive partitioning analysis. Historically the incidence of TEE in GBM patients is approximately 30%. As this study suggests dalteparin reduces the incidence of TEE, and does not have significant overlapping toxicities with most other drugs; its testing in a combined modality approach with other medications may be warranted in future trials.     

The challenging role of radiation therapy for very young children with rhabdomyosarcoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate local control and toxicity for very young children treated with multimodality therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 2004, 20 patientsor=1 year after diagnosis (15) in terms of mild, moderate, or severe deficits. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 33 months for survivors and 23 months for all patients. Two-year actuarial local control, event-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were 84%, 52%, 74%, and 62%, respectively. All patients who began EBRT相似文献   

A randomized trial of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and bis-chloroethyl nitrosourea for malignant glioma. A preliminary report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-02.

BACKGROUND. The third and final randomization of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 83-02 was performed to identify the maximal tolerated dose and potential efficacy of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (AHRT) in 1.6 Gy twice-daily fractions for adult malignant glioma. METHODS. From December 1987 to July 1989, 304 patients with malignant glioma were stratified by age, performance status, and histologic findings and randomized to receive total AHRT doses of 48.0 or 54.4 Gy, with 80 mg/m2 of bis-chloroethyl nitrosourea (BCNU) for 3 days every 8 weeks. Distribution of other prognostic factors, including neurologic function, extent of surgery, tumor size, and sex, was comparable in each treatment arm. RESULTS. One Grade 5 radiation therapy (RT)-related toxic effect was reported (in the 54.4-Gy treatment arm), and the incidence of late Grade 3-5 RT-related toxic effects at 18 months was 1% at 48.0 Gy and 4% at 54.4 Gy. The median survival times (MST) for the 48.0 Gy and 54.4 Gy treatment arms were 11.7 and 10.8 months, respectively, comparable to the MST in prior RTOG trials with a similar proportion of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (79%). For the 123 patients who were 60 years of age or older, the MST for the 48.0 Gy and 54.4 Gy treatment arms were 8.9 and 10.4 months, respectively, and compare favorably with the MST of 6.0 months reported with standard RT and BCNU treatment used for 101 patients who were 60 years of age or older in two prior RTOG malignant glioma trials (74-01 and 79-18). Although these results differ significantly (P = 0.0015), this contrast is not significant when adjusted by performance status. CONCLUSIONS. The maximum tolerated dose of AHRT has yet to be identified, and pursuit of this information may most benefit patients with malignant glioma who are 60 years of age or older.     

Results of whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases from colorectal carcinoma

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the colon-rectum is an infrequent cause of brain metastases, constituting 1.5% of all metastatic lesions to the brain. We reviewed our experience in the treatment of brain metastases from colorectal cancer to define the efficacy of whole brain radiation therapy as a palliative measure in this setting of patients. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive cases of brain metastasis from colorectal cancer treated between 1999 and 2004 were identified in the files of the Division of Radiotherapy of the A Businco Regional Oncological Hospital, Cagliari. Their records were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics and categorized according to the RTOG RPA classes. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (65%) had multiple metastases. Twenty-one patients (91%) showed extracranial metastases. Fourteen patients were classified as RTOG RPA class II and 9 class III. The median radiation dose delivered was 2000 cGy in 5 fractions in one week (range, 20-36 Gy). In 14 of 20 assessable patients (70%), symptomatic improvement was observed. The median follow-up and survival time for all the patients, 12 females and 11 males, was 3 months. In 3 patients only the cause of death was the brain metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the disappointing survival time, external radiation therapy to the whole brain proved to be an efficacious palliative treatment for patients with multiple or inoperable brain metastasis from colorectal cancer.