Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry.

AIMS: The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) Trial showed no benefit of early revascularization in patients aged >/=75 years with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. We examined the effect of age on treatment and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared clinical and treatment factors in patients in the SHOCK Trial Registry with shock due to pump failure aged <75 years (n=588) and >/=75 years (n=277), and 30-day mortality of patients treated with early revascularization <18 hours since onset of shock and those undergoing a later or no revascularization procedure. After excluding early deaths covariate-adjusted relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the revascularization strategies within the two age groups. Older patients more often had prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, other comorbidities, and severe coronary anatomy. In-hospital mortality in the early vs. late or no revascularization groups was 45 vs. 61% for patients aged <75 years (p=0.002) and 48 vs. 81% for those aged >/=75 years (p=0.0003). After exclusion of 65 early deaths and covariate adjustment, the relative risk was 0.76 (0.59, 0.99; p=0.045) in patients aged <75 years and 0.46 (0.28, 0.75; p=0.002) in patients aged >/=75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock are less likely to be treated with invasive therapies than younger patients with shock. Covariate-adjusted modeling reveals that elderly patients selected for early revascularization have a lower mortality rate than those receiving a revascularization procedure later or never.     

Salbutamol in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Intravenous salbutamol (13 microgram/min) has been given to 31 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Haemodynamic measurements were made in nine of these patients. Salbutamol increased cardiac index by 41 per cent from 1.25 +/- 0.06 l/min per m2 to 1.76 +/- 0.19 l/min per m2 and decreased systemic vascular resistance by 16 per cent from 26.2 +/- 1.9 units to 21.9 +/- 2.1 units. Heart rate rose by 13 per cent from 95 +/- 4.5 beats/min to 106 +/- 6.0 beats/min. Pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure fell from 20.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg to 16.9+/- 1.9 mmHg. Of the 31 patients, eight survived to leave hospital (27%). Five of the survivors had initial low heart rates and in these patients the clinical improvement was probably attributable to the positive chronotropic action of salbutamol. In the remaining three survivors clinical improvement was probably a result of salbutamol mediated afterload reduction. Salbutamol may be useful in the treatment of cardiogenic shock and pump failure complicating acute myocardial infarction.     

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction treated by emergent coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a dreadful complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with a poor prognosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely recommended by current treatment guidelines. AIM: To evaluate the in‐hospital and 30‐day mortality rate and to determine independent predictors of mortality in a cohort of unselected consecutive patients with CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rabin Medical Center cardiac catheterization laboratory database was analyzed between 1/2000 and 8/2003. Fifty of the 472 patients (10.6%) treated using emergent PCI for AMI had cardiogenic shock on presentation. Patients with cardiogenic shock were older, more likely to be female and with higher frequency of co‐morbidities. The time from symptom onset until seeking medical treatment was longer in cardiogenic shock patients. In‐hospital mortality rate was 48.0% in the cardiogenic shock group as compared to 3.3% in the non‐cardiogenic shock group (P<0.0001). In patients with shock, total mortality after 30 days was 52% (26/50). Most of these patients (25/26) died within 48?hours following admission because of refractory cardiogenic shock. A multivariate analysis adjusted for baseline differences showed that age ?75 years (odds ratio [OR]: 11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0–1.24, P = 0.05), and the use of GP 2b/3a antagonist (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95–1.0, P = 0.05), were independent predictors of all cause mortality at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Cardiogenic shock remains an important cause of mortality in AMI. Younger age and the use of GP 2b/3a antagonists during primary PCI for cardiogenic shock patients seems to be associated with better clinical outcomes.     

Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

To evaluate the role of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock, 53 patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were studied. Thirty-five (66.0%) patients received intravenous thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase 15 lac units) and 18 (34.0%) underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. There was no significant difference in the mean age, risk factor profile, presence of prior myocardial infarction, site of myocardial infarction and cardiac enzyme levels at presentation between the two groups. More male patients were present in the group undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (94.44% vs 68.57%; p = 0.04). The time delay between the onset of symptoms and presentation to the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (318.9 vs 320.0 minutes; p = NS). In the primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, 17 patients had a single infarct-related artery and one had both left anterior descending and right coronary artery occlusion. Thus in 18 patients, 19 vessels were attempted. Angiographic success (< 50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 15 (78.94%) vessels of which TIMI III flow was achieved in 10 (52.63%) vessels and TIMI II flow in five (26.31%). Intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in five (27.77%) patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. In-hospital mortality was 27.77 percent in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 57.14 percent in patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy (p = 0.04). In the thrombolytic therapy group, mortality was higher (85.91%) in patients presenting six hours or later after the onset of symptoms as compared to those presenting in less than six hours of the onset of symptoms (50%). In primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, mortality was 21.42 percent in patients with successful and 50 percent in patients with failed angioplasty. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, an aggressive invasive strategy with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, as compared to intravenous thrombolytic therapy, is helpful in reducing in-hospital mortality.     

急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克47例治疗和死亡原因分析

目的 评价急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克47例患者的临床疗效,寻求降低病死率、改善预后的措施.方法 回顾性分析2002年1月至2007年5月共47例心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者,运用心血管活性药物、主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)、介入手术或冠状动脉旁路移植术的治疗效果.结果 IABP治疗47例(100%),再血管化治疗41例(87.3%),死亡17例(36.2%).经药物和IABP治疗,在接受再血管化前死亡的患者占死亡数的35.3%(6/17),再血管化后死亡的患者占死亡数的64.7%(11/17).死于心功能衰竭者9例,死于肾功能衰竭和呼吸功能衰竭者8例.11例出现急性肾功能衰竭的患者全部死亡.急性肾功能衰竭(r=0.734,P=0.000)、急性呼吸功能衰竭(r=0.606,P=0.000)和糖尿病(r=0.372,P=0.012)与死亡有相关关系.结论 尽管急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的治疗有了很大的发展,但病死率仍然较高,主要死因是急性心力衰竭、急性肾功能衰竭和急性呼吸功能衰竭.要进一步降低急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者住院病死率,可能需要更好的循环辅助装置及加强重要器官的保护.     

Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A review

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary interventions and their widespread use, mortality in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) has remained very high, and treatment options are limited. Limited evidences exist, supporting many of the routinely used therapies in treating these patients. In the present article, we discuss CS complicating MI in general and an update on the currently available treatment options, including inotropes and vasopressor, coronary revascularization, mechanical circulatory support devices, mechanical complications, and long‐term outcomes.     

脉搏指数连续心输出量监测在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用

目的探讨脉搏指数连续心输出量监测(PICCO)在急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心源性休克(CS)患者中的应用价值。方法入选2012年1月至2013年1月因AMI合并心源性休克(CS)入住南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院心血管内科重症监护病房(CCU)患者56例。其中男性35例,女性21例,年龄28~75岁,平均(56.5±2.3)岁。随机分成PICCO组(27例)及对照组(29例)。对照组入CCU后立即监测血压,心率,呼吸次数,血氧饱和度及心电图,记录体温变化,深静脉穿刺监测中心静脉压(CVP)。PICCO组在此基础上,进行深静脉置管+股动脉置管+PICCO模块连接。监测心脏指数(CI),血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)及血清N-末端脑钠肽前体(NT-pro BNP)变化情况。结果与PICCO治疗24 h比较,治疗48 h EVLWI[(8.85±0.73)ml/kg vs.(7.41±1.36)ml/kg]下降,CI[(2.21±0.45)L/min·m2 vs.(2.60±0.17)L/min·m2]增加,NT-pro BNP[(4069.48±65.32)pg/ml vs.(3721±20.32)pg/ml]下降,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。随着时间延长,EVLWI下降,CI增加,NT-pro BNP呈降低的趋势。同时,EVLWI与NT-pro BNP呈直线正相关(r=0.78,P0.05)。PICCO组患者血管活性药物使用时间,入住CCU时间,机械通气时间,病死率以及出院时血清NT-pro BNP水平明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均0.05)。结论 PICCO对于AMI合并CS患者的治疗具有重要价值。     

Early revascularization improves survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

The effects of coronary revascularization by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass grafting, or both, on survival were evaluated in 81 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Thirty-two patients had successful revascularization and 49 patients had unsuccessful or no revascularization. Revascularization was achieved by coronary angioplasty in 22 patients, coronary bypass surgery in 2 and angioplasty followed by bypass surgery in 8. No significant differences were noted between the two groups with regard to baseline clinical or hemodynamic variables. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation was employed in 27 (84%) of the 32 patients in the group with revascularization and in 19 (39%) of the 49 patients without revascularization (p = 0.0006). The in-hospital survival was significantly better in the patients with--18 (56%) of 32--than in the patients without revascularization--4 (8%) of 49 (p less than 0.0001). At a mean follow-up period of 21 +/- 15 months, this survival difference persisted--16 (50%) of 32 patients with revascularization survived versus 1 (2%) of 49 patients without revascularization (p less than 0.0001). The mean time from the onset of shock to revascularization differed significantly between survivors (12.4 +/- 15 h) and nonsurvivors (58.5 +/- 93 h) in the group with revascularization (p = 0.0004). In the revascularization group, the in-hospital survival rate was 77% (17 of 22) when revascularization was performed within 24 h but only 10% (1 of 10) when it was performed after 24 h (p = 0.0006).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry

BACKGROUND: The SHOCK Registry prospectively enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in 36 multinational centers. METHODS: Cardiogenic shock was predominantly attributable to left ventricular pump failure in 884 patients. Of these, 276 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after shock onset and are the subject of this report. RESULTS: The majority (78%) of patients undergoing angiography had multivessel disease. As the number of diseased arteries rose from 1 to 3, mortality rates rose from 34.2% to 51.2%. Patients who underwent PCI had lower in-hospital mortality rates than did patients treated medically (46.4% vs 78.0%, P < .001), even after adjustment for patient differences and survival bias (P = .037). Before PCI, the culprit artery was occluded (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 0 or 1 flow) in 76.3%. After PCI, the in-hospital mortality rate was 33.3% if reperfusion was complete (grade 3 flow), 50.0% with incomplete reperfusion (grade 2 flow), and 85.7% with absent reperfusion (grade 0 or 1 flow) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter registry of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is consistent with a reduction in mortality rates as the result of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Coronary artery patency was an important predictor of outcome. Measures to promote early and rapid reperfusion appear critically important in improving the otherwise poor outcome associated with cardiogenic shock.     

Effect of vasopressin on hemodynamics in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

In a retrospective study of 36 patients who developed cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction, intravenous vasopressin therapy increased mean arterial pressure from 56 to 73 mm Hg at 1 hour (p < 0.001) and maintained it for 24 hours without changing pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, urine output, or other inotropic requirements. After norepinephrine administration, mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased at 1 hour from 21 to 24 mm Hg (p = 0.04); however, this increase was not sustained at 12 and 24 hours. Norepinephrine was associated with a significant increase in cardiac power index at 24 hours, whereas there was only a trend for an increase in cardiac power with vasopressin therapy. In a cohort of patients who developed refractory cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction, vasopressin was associated with increased mean arterial pressure and no adverse effect on other hemodynamic parameters.     

The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with AMI. Although several studies have demonstrated the importance of establishing and maintaining a patent infarct-related artery, it remains unclear as to whether intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) provides incremental benefit to reperfusion therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether IABP use is associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock in a large AMI registry. METHODS: We evaluated patients participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 who had cardiogenic shock at initial examination or in whom cardiogenic shock developed during hospitalization (n = 23,180). RESULTS: The mean age of patients in the study was 72 years, 54% were men, and the majority were white. The overall mortality rate in all patients who had cardiogenic shock or in whom cardiogenic shock developed was 70%. IABP was used in 7268 (31%) patients. IABP use was associated with a significant reduction in mortality rates in patients who received thrombolytic therapy (67% vs 49%) but was not associated with any benefit in patients treated with primary angioplasty (45% vs 47%). In a multivariate model, the use of IABP in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy decreased the odds of death by 18% (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock may have substantial benefit from IABP when used in combination with thrombolytic therapy.     

Microbiological profile of septic complication in patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (from the SHOCK study)

We sought to assess the microbiologic profile of patients with suspected sepsis who participated in the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial, a randomized controlled trial of early coronary revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. A protocol-mandated SEPSIS form was completed prospectively for 54 patients (18%) with fever or leukocytosis suggestive of sepsis. These patients were divided further into those with positive (n = 40) or negative (n = 14) culture results. The predominant pathogen isolated in patients with positive culture results was Staphylococcus aureus (32%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Patients with both positive and negative culture results had longer median durations of mechanical ventilation (p <0.001 and p = 0.02), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support (p = 0.074 and p = 0.021), and hospital stay (p <0.001 and p = 0.048) than controls. Sepsis was predicted by both duration of IABP support (p = 0.007) and use of multiple central catheters (p = 0.026). In conclusion, clinical sepsis is common after cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, particularly in patients who received prolonged IABP support or had multiple central catheters.