Dose reduction for the management of indinavir-related toxicity in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients in Taiwan: clinical and pharmacokinetic assessment.

This study evaluated the feasibility of reducing the indinavir (IDV) dosage in Taiwanese patients receiving the standard IDV/ritonavir (RTV) dosage of 800/100 mg twice a day who had undetectable plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA but had developed IDV-related toxicities. After dosage reduction to IDV/RTV 600/100 mg twice a day, the dose-related toxicity decreased and plasma HIV RNA remained undetectable at 24 weeks post-switch in all patients. The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of IDV decreased significantly (median, 6.3 vs 4.3 microg/mL and 1892 vs 1292 microg.min/mL, p=0.01 and 0.001, respectively) but the minimal plasma concentration remained at a similar level (median, 1.0 vs 0.8 microg/mL, p=0.12). This study found that the reduction in the dosage of IDV in HIV-1 infected patients receiving the standard IDV/RTV regimen guided by therapeutic drug monitoring decreased the Cmax, dose-related toxicity and medical cost without compromising viral control.     

A Clinical Study of the Combination of 100 mg Ritonavir plus 800 mg Indinavir as Salvage Therapy: Influence of Increased Plasma Drug Levels in the Rate of Response

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of indinavir (IDV) in a twice daily dosing regimen with coadministration of 100 mg ritonavir (RTV) and to explore the influence of plasma drug levels in the rate of virologic response. Method: We performed a prospective study of 59 patients who switched to a salvage regimen with two nucleoside analogs plus the combination of 100 mg RTV plus 800 mg IDV twice daily. Pharmacokinetics of IDV and RTV were assessed in 11 patients. Results: Previous antiretroviral exposure was 44 months, and 78% and 39% of patients had previously failed regimens with either IDV or RTV. Median CD4 count was 248 × 10⁶/L and HIV load was 3.9 log₁₀ copies/mL. The median number of mutations in the protease gene was 9 (3–14), predominantly at residues 82 (53%), 90 (42%), and 46 (32%). After 24 weeks, 61% of patients had a viral load decrease greater than 1 log₁₀, and 38% had a viral load below 50 copies/mL. Nephrolitiasis, hematuria, or flank pain was observed in 13 patients (22%), leading to withdrawal in six cases (10%). IDV trough levels were well above the IC₉₅ (median 1.75 mg/L, interquartile range 1.07-2.57), but RTV trough levels were below the IC₉₅ in 88% of patients. There was a close correlation between higher peak levels of IDV, virological response, and renal toxicity. Conclusion: RTV/IDV 100/800 mg in a twice daily dosing regimen is associated with a significant virological response in patients with antiretroviral treatment failure. The correlation between plasma drug levels, toxicity, and response suggests the usefulness of individualized drug monitoring.     

Experience of a combination including indinavir 400 mg plus ritonavir 200 mg twice daily in HIV-infected patients: pharmacokinetic data

Low doses of ritonavir, a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, enhances the pharmacokinetic profile of indinavir with increased serum levels. We assessed the indinavir-ritonavir 400/200 twice daily combination in 17 HIV-infected patients focusing on the pharmacokinetic data and the tolerance of this regimen. IDV trough and peak concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Median indinavir trough and peak concentrations were 553 ng/ml and 3626 ng/ml, respectively. A good tolerance was observed except for three patients who experienced a major toxicity. Only one dose adjustment was related to indinavir toxicity. Considering the fact that Cmax is mainly responsible of the adverse effects, particularly renal stones, the indinavir-ritonavir 400/200 mg twice daily regimen offers a well-tolerated combination with an increased Cmin but a lower Cmax compared with both the standard tid regimen and higher dose of IDV-RTV regimens.     

Coadministration of esomeprazole with fosamprenavir has no impact on steady-state plasma amprenavir pharmacokinetics

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the drug interaction between fosamprenavir (FPV) and esomeprazole (ESO) after repeated doses in healthy adults. METHODS: Subjects received ESO 20 mg once daily (qd) for 7 days followed by either ESO 20 mg qd + FPV 1400 mg twice daily (bid) or ESO 20 mg qd + FPV 700 mg bid + ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg bid for 14 days in arms 1 and 2, respectively. After a 21- to 28-day washout, subjects received either FPV 1400 mg bid for 14 days (arm 1) or FPV 700 mg bid + RTV 100 mg bid for 14 days (arm 2). Pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted on the last day of each treatment. RESULTS: Simultaneous coadministration of ESO 20 mg qd with either FPV 1400 mg bid or FPV 700 mg bid + RTV 100 mg bid had no effect on steady-state amprenavir pharmacokinetics. The only effect on plasma ESO exposure was a 55% increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval, tau[AUC0-tau], after coadministration of ESO 20 mg qd with FPV 1400 mg bid. CONCLUSIONS: FPV 1400 mg bid or FPV 700 mg bid + RTV 100 mg bid may be coadministered simultaneously with ESO without dose adjustment. However, the impact of staggered administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on plasma amprenavir exposure is unknown at present.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of twice-daily dosing of saquinavir plus ritonavir in HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE: To compare the steady state plasma pharmacokinetics of 1000 mg of saquinavir (SQV) in a soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation in combination with 100 mg of ritonavir (RTV) (capsules) in a twice-daily dosing regimen in HIV-1-infected individuals with historical controls who used 400 mg of SQV in a hard-gel capsule (HGC) formulation in combination with 400 mg of RTV and to investigate the plasma pharmacokinetics of the 1000 mg/100 mg regimen after normal and high-fat breakfasts. DESIGN: Open-label, crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study. METHODS: Six HIV-1-infected individuals who used either 1200 mg of SQV (SGC or HGC) three times daily or 400 mg twice daily in combination with 400 mg of RTV twice daily were included. Each patient was switched to 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily. After 14 days, the patients came to the hospital for assessment of a pharmacokinetic profile during 12 hours. Patients were randomized to receive a high-fat (+/-45 g of fat) or normal (+/-20 g of fat) breakfast. After 7 days, a second pharmacokinetic profile was assessed after ingestion of the drugs with the alternate breakfast. A noncompartmental pharmacokinetic method was used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC0-12h), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the plasma trough concentration (C12h), and the elimination half-life in plasma (t1/2). The obtained pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with those of 12 patients using SQV HGC (400 mg twice daily) in combination with RTV (400 mg twice daily). RESULTS: The median values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for SQV SGC (1000 mg twice daily, normal breakfast) were: AUC0-12h, 18.84 h*mg/L; Cmax, 3.66 mg/L; C12h, 0.40 mg/L; and t1/2, 3.0 hours. The median values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for SQV HGC (400 mg twice daily, normal breakfast) were: AUC0-12h, 6.99 h*mg/L; Cmax, 1.28 mg/L; C12h, 0.23 mg/L; and t1/2, 3.9 hours. The exposure to SQV in the dosing regimen of 1000 mg twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily was significantly higher than the exposure to SQV in a dosing regimen of 400 mg twice daily in combination with 400 mg of RTV twice daily. The pharmacokinetic parameters of SQV SGC in the dosing regimen of 1000 mg twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily were not significantly different after ingestion of a high-fat or normal breakfast (p >.35). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily and 100 mg of RTV twice daily resulted in a higher exposure to SQV compared with the exposure to SQV obtained when SQV is used in the 400 mg/400 mg twice-daily combination with RTV. In this small number of patients, no significant differences in exposure were seen after ingestion of either a normal or high-fat breakfast. From a pharmacokinetic perspective, the combination of 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily and 100 mg of RTV twice daily seems to be a good option for further clinical evaluation.     

Coadministration of lopinavir/ritonavir and phenytoin results in two-way drug interaction through cytochrome P-450 induction

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate; it also may induce cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isozymes. Phenytoin (PHT) is a CYP3A4 inducer and CYP2C9/CYP2C19 substrate. This study quantified the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interaction between LPV/RTV and PHT. Open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, PK study in healthy volunteers. Subjects in arm A (n = 12) received LPV/RTV 400/100 mg twice daily (BID) (days 1-10), followed by LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID + PHT 300 mg once daily (QD) (days 11-22). Arm B (n = 12) received PHT 300 mg QD (days 1-11), followed by PHT 300 mg QD + LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID (days 12-23). Plasma samples were collected on day 11 and day 22; PK parameters were compared by geometric mean ratio (GMR, day 22:day 11). P values <0.05 were considered significant. Following PHT addition, LPV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h) decreased from 70.9 +/-37.0 to 49.6 +/- 25.1 microg.h/mL (GMR 0.67, P = 0.011) and C0h decreased from 6.0 +/- 3.2 to 3.6 +/- 2.3 microg/mL (GMR 0.54, P = 0.001). Following LPV/RTV addition, PHT AUC0-24h decreased from 191.0+/-89.2 to 147.8+/-104.5 microg.h/mL (GMR 0.69, P = 0.009) and C0h decreased from 7.0+/-4.0 to 5.3+/-4.1 microg/mL (GMR 0.66, P = 0.033). Concomitant LPV/RTV and PHT use results in a 2-way drug interaction. Phenytoin appears to increase LPV clearance via CYP3A4 induction, which is not offset by the presence of low-dose RTV. LPV/RTV may increase PHT clearance via CYP2C9 induction. Management should be individualized to each patient; dosage or medication adjustments may be necessary.     

Lipid Changes in Patients Initiating Efavirenz- and Indinavir-Based Antiretroviral Regimens

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate nonfasting lipid levels in a large cohort of patients on three HAART regimens: efavirenz + zidovudine + lamivudine (EFV+ZDV+3TC), efavirenz + indinavir (EFV+IDV), and indinavir + zidovudine + lamivudine (IDV+ZDV+3TC). Method: Nonfasting lipid levels were analyzed from a large randomized multicenter treatment trial for HIV-infected patients initiating HAART. Treatment evaluations were carried out at prescribed intervals, and data were recorded and analyzed. Assessment was limited to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol. Results: The results demonstrate an increase in the total cholesterol, ranging from 23 to 57 mg/dL, in the three combinations of HAART therapy. The increase was most significant in the EFV+IDV arm where the effects appear to be additive. HDL cholesterol also increased in all three arms, but the greatest increase was in the two groups containing EFV. In all three arms, the HDL cholesterol increased significantly in women while increases in men were seen only in the EFV-containing arms. Men taking either IDV-containing regimen had a greater increase in total cholesterol, and therefore the total/HDL cholesterol ratio rose significantly. Conclusion: EFV and IDV independently elevate lipid levels. Alterations in the lipid levels may lead to increased cardiovascular risk in men, possibly mitigated by elevations in HDL cholesterol. In addition, changes in HDL cholesterol were significantly different between men and women.     

Steady-State Amprenavir,Tenofovir, and Emtricitabine Pharmacokinetics Before and After Reducing Ritonavir Boosting of a Fosamprenavir/Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Regimen from 200 mg to 100 mg Once Daily (TELEX II)

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate how reducing ritonavir (RTV) boosting from 200 mg to 100 mg once daily (QD) affects steady-state pharmacokinetics of components of a fosamprenavir (FPV)-based regimen. Methods: Prospective, open-label, pharmacokinetic study in 12 HIV-infected patients stabilized on FPV/RTV 1400 mg/200 mg + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) 300 mg/200 mg QD (TELEX II). Pharmacokinetics were assessed by noncompartmental analysis at baseline and 4 weeks after RTV reduction to 100 mg QD. Results: Baseline median minimum plasma concentration (C_min) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours post dose (AUC_24h) were as follows: APV: 1,708 ng/mL, 84,260 h ? ng/mL; tenofovir: 53 ng/mL, 2,420 h ? ng/mL; FTC: 58 ng/mL, 9,190 h ? ng/mL; RTV: 80 ng/mL, 10,230 h ? ng/mL. Four weeks after reducing RTV, changes in C_min and AUC_24h were: APV: +26%, +0.6%; tenofovir: +77%, +30%; FTC: +188%, +13%; RTV –64%, –79%. Component plasma concentration ranges were consistent with historical values. Median APV C_min was 14.7-fold above the protein-binding-adjusted 50% inhibitory concentration of wild-type HIV. Four weeks after RTV reduction, HIV-1 RNA levels remained <50 copies/mL in all patients, median CD4+ count increased from 465 to 495 cells/mm³, and favorable lipid changes and no adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Reducing RTV boosting from 200 to 100 mg QD of FPV/TDF/FTC QD conferred no detrimental effect on APV, tenofovir, FTC, or RTV pharmacokinetics and maintained virologic suppression.     

Antiviral Potency of HAART Regimens and Clinical Success Are Not Strictly Coupled in Real Life Conditions: Evidence from the MASTER-1 Study

Abstract

Purpose: To compare in a real clinical setting the largely unknown midterm clinical effectiveness of two protease inhibitor (PI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens with different potency and tolerability profiles in naïve patients. Method: This study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial in naïve patients with less than 400 CD4+ cell count/μL, regardless of viral load. Treatment arms were hard gel capsule saquinavir (HGC-SQV)-based HAART (Arm A), with an expected more favorable tolerability profile, and indinavir (IDV)-based HAART (Arm B), with more potent virologic activity. While viro-immunological surrogate markers and World Health Organization (WHO) grade III toxicity (secondary endpoints) were regularly monitored, primary endpoints of the study were clinical and defined as any AIDS-defining event, AIDS-related death, WHO grade IV toxicity, drop outs, and protocol violations. Results: 262 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study from March 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997, in 24 different Italian clinical centers (132, Arm A; 130, Arm B). After 24 months of follow-up, patients who were enrolled in Arm B showed a significantly higher rate of virological success (75% had viremia below 500 copies/mL, CI = 12.9%, in the on-treatment analysis) and immunological gain (mean CD4+ cell count increase of 274 CD4+ cells/μL, SD = 234) when compared to patients enrolled in arm A (57%, CI = 15.5% and 223 CD4+ cells/μL, SD = 192; p = .0353 and .026, respectively). Despite the significant difference observed in surrogate markers, the number of total primary endpoints did not differ in the two groups (55 out of 132 in Arm A vs. 58 out of 130 person-years in Arm B; p = .86). Conclusion: Our results suggest that, after 24 months of follow-up in a real clinical setting, a PI-based HAART induces significant clinical benefits in naïve patients even in the absence of a complete suppression of viral replication. However, the long-term clinical impact of the possible accumulation of viral mutations in the presence of low-grade viral replication remains to be elucidated.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on coadministration with lopinavir/ritonavir

OBJECTIVE: Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are frequently used antiretrovirals. A pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers was conducted to assess the potential for a drug interaction between these agents. METHODS: This was a 36-day, multiple-dose, drug-drug interaction study of TDF and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). Subjects received TDF alone for 7 days, followed by 14 days each of TDF plus LPV/r and LPV/r alone in a randomized manner. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed over 24 hours on days 7, 21, and 35. LPV/r and tenofovir plasma/serum concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectometry (MS)/MS. Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of pharmacokinetic parameters for tenofovir, LPV, and ritonavir (RTV) were estimated using analysis of variance and compared with the no-effect criterion for pharmacokinetic equivalence. RESULTS: Tenofovir measurements with an area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval, maximum concentration, and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctau) were 32%, 15%, and 51% higher, respectively, when TDF was coadministered with LPV/r (n = 24). LPV and RTV pharmacokinetics, including Ctau, were unaffected by TDF (n = 24). Clinical estimates of renal function were unaffected by administration of TDF alone or with LPV/r. DISCUSSION: Coadministration of TDF with LPV/r resulted in increased tenofovir exposures at steady state, possibly through increased absorption. This increase is not believed to be clinically relevant based on the safety and efficacy of TDF plus LPV/r-containing regimens in HIV-infected patients in long-term controlled clinical trials.     

Efficacy and safety of atazanavir, with or without ritonavir, as part of once-daily highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naive patients

BACKGROUND: Atazanavir (ATV), the first once-daily protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, is recommended for use in antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive and -experienced patients. Study AI424-089 was a prospective, randomized, open-label, 96-week study comparing 2 ATV-based treatment regimens in ARV-naive HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Adults with HIV RNA levels > or =2000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1) to once-daily ATV at a dose of 300 mg with ritonavir at a dose of 100 mg (ATV300/RTV) or ATV at a dose of 400 mg (ATV400); both regimens included lamivudine and an investigational extended-release formulation of stavudine. The primary endpoint for this noninferiority study was the proportion of patients (response rate) with an HIV RNA load <400 copies/mL at week 48. RESULTS: Response rates at week 48 were 86% and 85% on the ATV300/RTV and ATV400 regimens, respectively (difference estimate [95% confidence interval] = 1.5 [-8.2 to 11.1]). There were 3 and 10 patients with virologic failure in the ATV300/RTV and ATV400 groups, respectively. One patient (ATV400) developed phenotypic resistance to ATV associated with an I50L substitution. Adverse event-related discontinuations were 8% among ATV300/RTV-treated patients and <1% among ATV400-treated patients. Plasma lipid elevations were low with both regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the ATV300/RTV regimen and confirm the safety and efficacy of ATV400 in an ARV-naive patient population.     

Atazanavir Plasma Concentrations Vary Significantly Between Patients and Correlate with Increased Serum Bilirubin Concentrations

Abstract

Background: Atazanavir (ATV) is recommended to be dosed at 400 mg once daily or 300 mg daily coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir (RTV). Method: 31 male patients receiving ATV either alone or boosted with RTV for more than 2 weeks had ATV concentration measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). ATV concentrations were adjusted to obtain a 24-hour trough level using a standard pharmacokinetic formula. Results: 25 samples were taken from patients who received 300 mg ATV, 6 with 200 mg, 3 with 400 mg, and 2 with 150 mg, all boosted with 100 mg RTV. In the unboosted group, patients received 400 mg (7) or 600 mg (2). The median adjusted 24-hour trough ATV concentration was 630 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 355-1034) in the boosted and 113 ng/mL (IQR 50-225) in the unboosted group (p = .001). Median serum bilirubin concentration was 34 IU/L (IQR 27.5-49) and 41 IU/L (IQR 31-45) in the boosted and unboosted groups, respectively. In the boosted group, high ATV concentrations were significantly correlated with increased serum bilirubin concentrations (p = .003). Conclusion: ATV concentrations showed considerable interpatient variability. Bilirubin concentrations are an indicator of high ATV concentrations and may prove to be useful in selecting patients for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).     

Study of Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Fosamprenavir plus Ritonavir Administered with Abacavir/Lamivudine Once Daily in Antiretroviral-Naïve HIV-1–Infected Adult Subjects

Abstract

Purpose: Fosamprenavir/ritonavir 1400 mg/100 mg once-daily regimen may have a more favourable tolerability and lipid profile than the fosamprenavir/ritonavir twice-daily regimen, while maintaining comparable antiviral efficacy. Methods: This open-label study had a group-sequential design with a stage 1 Week 24 futility analysis, with both efficacy and safety go-criteria for progression to stage 2. There were 214 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1–infected subjects who were randomised to receive either fosamprenavir/ritonavir 1400 mg/100 mg once daily or fosamprenavir/ ritonavir 700 mg/100 mg twice daily, both with abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination tablet. Primary endpoints were the proportion of subjects achieving HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL at Week 48 and the mean change from baseline in fasting non-HDL cholesterol. Results: Though stage 1 futility analysis did not meet criteria for progression to stage 2, subjects enrolled in stage 1 were followed to Week 48 per protocol. At Week 48, noninferior efficacy of once daily to twice daily (95% CI around the treatment difference, –11.4 to 9.5) was achieved, with 86/106 (81%) subjects in the once-daily and 87/106 (82%) in the twice-daily arm achieving HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL. Mean change from baseline at Week 48 in non-HDL cholesterol was 1.10 mmol/L and 1.26 mmol/L (p = .478) for the once-daily and twice-daily arms, respectively. Conclusion: Though the study did not continue to stage 2, fosamprenavir/ritonavir once daily demonstrated noninferior antiviral efficacy to fosamprenavir/ritonavir twice daily.     

A 14-day dose-response study of the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients

Tipranavir (TPV), a novel nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (NPPI), was administered to treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients over 14 days in a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) formulation, in combination with ritonavir (RTV). Of the 31 patients enrolled, 10 were randomized to receive TPV 1200 mg twice daily (TPV 1200), 10 patients received TPV 300 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 300/200), and 11 patients received TPV 1200 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 1200/200). The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 4.96 log10 copies/mL and 244 cells/mm, respectively. After 14 days, the median decrease in viral load was -0.77 log10 in the TPV 1200 group, -1.43 log10 in the TPV/r 300/200 group, and -1.64 log10 in the TPV/r 1200/200 group. TPV exposure was increased by 24- and 70-fold in the TPV/r 300/200 and 1200/200 groups, respectively, compared with TPV 1200 alone. There were no significant differences across treatment arms with regard to drug-related adverse events. TPV/r appeared to be safe, effective, and well tolerated during 14 days of treatment.     

The pharmacokinetic profile of raltegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected individuals over 60 years of age

Background:

Antiretroviral safety and efficacy and may differ in older versus younger HIV-infected patients. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in older HIV-infected subjects (>60?years) switching combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) to a raltegravir (RAL) containing regimen.

Methods:

Nineteen HIV-infected patients over 60?years of age on effective cART (HIV-RNA Results:

In HIV-infected subjects over the age of 60 (mean?±?SD age: 66?±?3.4?years, n?=?19) switching to a RAL containing regimen, we observed no safety concerns, no plasma virological rebounds, and no differences in RAL apparent oral clearance when compared to younger HIV-infected populations (mean?±?SD age: 41?±?9.2?years, n?=?38) based on population pharmacokinetic analysis. After 24?weeks of study therapy a decline in cognitive function was observed [change in (SD) global score of (0.91 (1.3), P?=?0.018].

Conclusions:

No significant changes in RAL exposure associated with age were observed.     

Similar Virologic and Immunologic Efficacy With Fosamprenavir Boosted With 100 mg or 200 mg of Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Patients: Results of the LESS Trial

Abstract

Purpose: Ritonavir (RTV) effectively boosts most protease inhibitors but is associated with significant dose-dependent adverse events (AEs). In an effort to better manage toxicities through a reduced dose of RTV, this study compared fosamprenavir (FPV) boosted with RTV 100 mg (FPV/r100) or with RTV 200 mg (FPV/r200) daily. Methods: This 24-week, open-label study enrolled patients taking a FPV/r200-containing regimen who had HIV RNA <400 copies/mL and randomized them 1:2 to continue that regimen or simplify to FPV/r100 once daily. Other medications were not altered. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients without suspected or confirmed virologic failure (HIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL) through week 24 by a missing/discontinuation equals failure (M/D=F) analysis. Noninferiority criteria were demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint rates between groups was greater than ?12. Results: The 2 regimens met prespecified noninferiority criteria (FPV/r100, 92%; FPV/r200, 94%; 95% CI, ?9.36 to 5.12). At week 24, the percentage of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL by M/ D=F was 83% in the FPV/r100 group and 85% in the FPV/r200 group. Drug-related grade 2?4 AEs were uncommon (FPV/r100, 4%; FPV/r200, 7%). Median changes in lipids were similar in both groups, with the exception of triglycerides (FPV/r100, ?21 mg/dL; FPV/r200, ?2 mg/dL). Conclusions: This 24-week study demonstrated that among previously suppressed patients, once-daily FPV/r100 was similar to FPV/r200 in virologic and immunologic effects but was associated with greater decreases from baseline in triglyceride levels.     

A pilot trial of indinavir, ritonavir, didanosine, and lamivudine in a once-daily four-drug regimen for HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and virologic and immunologic outcomes of once-daily indinavir, ritonavir, didanosine, and lamivudine in HIV-seropositive individuals. DESIGN: Open-label 24-week pilot study. PATIENTS: Ten HIV-seropositive subjects who were either antiretroviral-naive or minimally experienced with short-term single-or dual-nucleoside therapy provided informed consent and were enrolled. All subjects received didanosine (400 mg) 30 to 60 minutes before a meal followed by indinavir (1200 mg), ritonavir (400 mg), and lamivudine (300 mg) concurrent with the aforementioned meal. METHODS: Safety laboratory tests, including a complete blood cell count and amylase, lipase, liver transaminase, and nonfasting lipid monitoring as well as plasma HIV viral load and CD4+ lymphocyte count, were carried out at monthly intervals. Genotyping was performed at baseline. Pharmacokinetic studies for indinavir and ritonavir were performed at week 8. RESULTS: Nine of 10 subjects completed 24 weeks of therapy. No subject demonstrated primary protease inhibitor mutations at baseline. Toxicities experienced by subjects were typically mild and consistent with those commonly reported for each of the medications, including two cases of hematuria. By week 24, median nonfasting cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased by 49% and 108%, respectively. Median baseline plasma HIV viral load and CD4+ lymphocyte count were 29,292 (4.47 log10) copies/ml and 224 cells/mm3, respectively. Eight of 10 subjects had a plasma HIV viral load of <50 copies/ml by week 12. The 2 subjects with a detectable HIV viral load reached <50 copies/ml by week 28. Median CD4+ lymphocyte counts increased by 193 cells/mm3 at week 24. Indinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations remained above respective inhibitory and effective concentrations (IC95 and EC50) (uncorrected for protein binding) throughout the 24-hour dosing interval for 6 of 10 and 8 of 10 subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study demonstrates excellent virologic suppression despite low minimum protease inhibitor concentrations during a dosing interval in some patients and is supportive of further study.