Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides

Prior research with inbred mouse strains indicates that C57BL/6J (B6) mice display stronger preference and acceptance for various sweeteners than do 129P3/J (129) mice. Experiment 1 examined the extent to which this strain difference could be modified by repeated exposure to sucrose. Sucrose-naive 129 mice displayed weaker preferences than did B6 mice for 0.5% to 4% sucrose solutions during 23h/day sugar vs. water tests. Sucrose preference did not differ at 8-32% concentrations. Yet, when retested with sucrose, the 129 and B6 mice showed identical robust preferences (>90%) for 0.5-32% solutions. The strains also did not differ in sucrose preference in tests with descending sucrose concentrations (0.5-0.0625%). Sucrose-experienced 129 mice also showed enhanced preference for dilute saccharin solutions suggesting that their sweet taste responsivity was enhanced. Experiment 2 revealed that preference for dilute saccharin solutions was enhanced by prior saccharin experience in B6 but not 129 mice. Experiment 3 tested the strains with Polycose which has a palatable taste different from that of sucrose. Polycose-naive 129 mice displayed weaker preferences for dilute (0.5-4%) but not concentrated (8-32%) Polycose solutions relative to B6 mice. In the second test series Polycose preferences were nearly identical in the two strains. In Experiments 1 and 3, prior sucrose or Polycose experience also reduced or eliminated strain differences in saccharide acceptance (absolute intake) at higher but not lower concentrations. Thus, exposure to the oral and post-oral actions of sucrose and Polycose increased saccharide preference in B6 mice and even more in 129 mice so that the strain difference virtually disappeared. Whether the 129 mice responded to the taste or other properties (e.g., odor) of the dilute saccharide solutions is not certain but their gustatory sensitivity needs to be reconsidered.     

Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite

Inbred mouse strains differ in their preferences for sweeteners, due in part to variations in their T1R3 sweet taste receptor. Recent studies of sweet sensitive C57BL/6J (B6) and subsensitive 129P3/J (129) mice indicate that experiential and post-oral effects of sugar substantially modify sweetener preference. In fact, the strain difference in sucrose preference disappeared after the mice were given 23 h/day tests with sucrose at ascending concentrations (0.5-32%). Intragastric infusions of sucrose (16%) also conditioned increased preference for and absolute intake of flavored sweet solutions in B6 and 129 mice. An operant analysis of sweetener appetite revealed, unexpectedly, that sugar-experienced 129 mice respond more vigorously than B6 mice for 16% sucrose rewards. These findings indicate that experiential and nutritional factors can, to some degree, override genetic differences in peripheral taste sensitivity in determining food appetite.     

Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences

C57BL/6J (B6) mice display stronger preference and acceptance for various sweeteners than do 129 mice (129P3/J, 129X1/SvJ). The present experiment compared the preference of these strains for fat flavor as well as sweet taste using 24-h two-bottle preference tests. Fat flavor preference was evaluated using non-nutritive (olestra) and nutritive (Intralipid) oil emulsions. In initial oil vs. water tests olestra preference and intake were greater in B6 mice than 129 mice. Similar strain differences were obtained with low (0.313%-5%) but not high (10%-20%) Intralipid concentrations. When retested with Intralipid the B6 and 129 mice showed strong (>90%) preferences for the nutritive oil although B6 mice still consumed more oil at low concentrations. A second olestra test revealed increased oil preference and acceptance in B6 and 129X1/SvJ mice while 129P3/J mice still did not prefer olestra to water. Sweetener tests revealed stronger saccharin and sucrose preferences in B6 mice than in 129 mice. These strain differences in sweetener preference disappeared when the mice were retested with sucrose and saccharin. However, B6 mice continued to consume more saccharin and sucrose (at low concentrations) than did 129 mice. The profile of strain differences for non-nutritive and nutritive oils was similar to those observed for non-nutritive and nutritive sweeteners. The differential sweetener preferences of B6 and 129 mice is explained by differences in their sweet taste receptors but why the strains also differ in their initial fat flavor preference is not clear. The experientially-induced increases in oil and sweetener preferences displayed by the mice are attributed to the post-oral actions of Intralipid and sucrose. These findings along with intragastric infusion data suggest that B6 and 129 mice differ in their oral but not their post-oral response to fat and sugar.     

Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat

Progressive ratio (PR) schedules, which require increasing numbers of responses for successive reinforcements, are widely used to measure the reward value of foods, fluids, and drugs in operant lever-pressing tasks. The present study evaluated a PR operant licking task as a measure of sweet taste reward. In Experiment 1, food deprived rats were offered sucrose to drink on PR lick or fixed ratio (FR) lick schedules (30 min/day). In Experiment 2, nondeprived rats were offered sucrose to drink on PR or FR schedules and free access to water and food 23 h/day. In both experiments, the FR rats increased and then decreased their sucrose solution intake as concentration increased from 1% to 32% or 64%. The PR rats, in contrast, showed a near-linear increase in sucrose solution intake, lick rates, and break points (highest ratio completed) as a function of sucrose concentration. The PR rats drank less sucrose than did the FR rats although they emitted more total licks at the highest concentration tested. These results are similar to those reported with PR lever-pressing tasks. Thus, PR operant licking, which requires minimal training and equipment, is a useful alternate measure of fluid reward in rodents.     

Differential effects of sucrose and fructose on dietary obesity in four mouse strains

We examined sugar-induced obesity in mouse strains polymorphic for Tas1r3, a gene that codes for the T1R3 sugar taste receptor. The T1R3 receptor in the FVB and B6 strains has a higher affinity for sugars than that in the AKR and 129P3 strains. In Experiment 1, mice had 40 days of access to lab chow plus water, sucrose (10 or 34%), or fructose (10 or 34%) solutions. The strains consumed more of the sucrose than isocaloric fructose solutions. The pattern of strain differences in caloric intake from the 10% sugar solutions was FVB > 129P3 = B6 > AKR; and that from the 34% sugar solutions was FVB > 129P3 > B6 ≥ AKR. Despite consuming more sugar calories, the FVB mice resisted obesity altogether. The AKR and 129P3 mice became obese exclusively on the 34% sucrose diet, while the B6 mice did so on the 34% sucrose and 34% fructose diets. In Experiment 2, we compared total caloric intake from diets containing chow versus chow plus 34% sucrose. All strains consumed between 11 and 25% more calories from the sucrose-supplemented diet. In Experiment 3, we compared the oral acceptability of the sucrose and fructose solutions, using lick tests. All strains licked more avidly for the 10% sucrose solutions. The results indicate that in mice (a) Tas1r3 genotype does not predict sugar-induced hyperphagia or obesity; (b) sucrose solutions stimulate higher daily intakes than isocaloric fructose solutions; and (c) susceptibility to sugar-induced obesity varies with strain, sugar concentration and sugar type.     

Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice

Genetic factors strongly influence the intake and preference for sugar and saccharin solutions in inbred mouse strains. The present study determined if genetic variance also influences the learned preferences for flavors added to sugar solutions. Conditioned flavor preferences (CFPs) are produced in rodents by adding a flavor (CS+) to a sugar solution and a different flavor (CS-) to a saccharin solution (CS-) in one-bottle training trials; the CS+ is subsequently preferred to the CS- when both are presented in saccharin solutions in two-bottle tests. With some sugars (e.g., sucrose), flavor preferences are reinforced by both sweet taste and post-oral nutrient effects, whereas with other sugars (e.g., fructose), sweet taste is the primary reinforcer. Sucrose and fructose were used in three experiments to condition flavor preferences in one outbred (CD-1) and eight inbred strains which have "sensitive" (SWR/J, SJL/J, C57BL/10J, C57BL/6J) or "sub-sensitive" (DBA/2J, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, 129P3/J) sweet taste receptors (T1R2/T1R3). Food-restricted mice of each strain were trained (1 h/day) to drink flavored 16% sucrose (CS+ 16S, Experiment 1), 16% fructose (CS+ 16F, Experiment 2) or 8% fructose+0.2% saccharin (CS+ 8F, Experiment 3) solutions on five alternate days and a differently flavored saccharin solution (0.05% or 0.2%, CS-) on the other five alternating days. The CS+ and CS- flavors were presented in 0.2% saccharin for two-bottle testing over six days. All strains preferred the CS+ 16S to CS- although there were significant strain differences in the magnitude and persistence of the sucrose preference. The strains also differed in the magnitude and persistence of preferences for the CS+ 16F and CS+ 8F flavors over the CS- with two strains failing to prefer the fructose-paired flavors. Sucrose conditioned stronger preferences than did fructose which is attributed to differences in the taste and post-oral actions of the sugars. These differential training intakes may not have influenced the sucrose-CFP because of the post-oral reinforcing actions of sucrose. Overall, sweet sensitive and sub-sensitive mice did not differ in sucrose-CFP, but unexpectedly, the sub-sensitive mice displayed stronger fructose-CFP. This may be related to differential training intakes of CS+ and CS- solutions: sweet sensitive mice consumed more CS- than CS+ during training while sub-sensitive mice consumed more CS+.     

Sweet and Bitter Taste of Ethanol in C57BL/6J and DBA2/J Mouse Strains

Studies of inbred strains of rats and mice have suggested a positive association between strain variations in sweet taste and ethanol intake. However, strain associations by themselves are insufficient to support a functional link between taste and ethanol intake. We used conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to explore the sweet and bitter taste of ethanol and ability to detect sucrose, quinine and ethanol in C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mouse strains that are frequently used in alcohol research. The present study showed that C57BL/6J mice generalized taste aversions from sucrose and quinine solutions to 10% ethanol and, reciprocally, aversions to 10% ethanol generalized to each of these solutions presented separately. Only conditioned aversions to quinine generalized to ethanol in the DBA/2J strain but an aversion conditioned to ethanol did not generalize reciprocally to quinine. Thus, considering these two gustatory qualities, 10% ethanol tastes both sweet and bitter to B6 mice but only bitter to D2. Both strains were able to generalize taste aversions across different concentrations of the same compound. B6 were able to detect lower concentrations of quinine than D2 but both strains were able to detect sucrose and (in contrast to previous findings) ethanol at similar concentrations. The strain-dependent gustatory profiles for ethanol may make an important contribution to the understanding of the undoubtedly complex mechanisms influencing high ethanol preference of B6 and pronounced ethanol avoidance of D2 mice.     

Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice

Compared with mice from the 129P3/J (129) inbred strain, mice from the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) inbred strain have higher consumption of several sweet-tasting amino acids and carbohydrates. To examine the relative contribution of taste and nutritive properties in these strain differences, we measured responses of B6 and 129 mice to eight sweet and non-sweet amino acids and carbohydrates in two-bottle preference tests with water. Mice from the two strains did not differ in consumption of non-sweet l-valine and l-histidine. Compared with 129 mice, B6 mice had higher consumption and lower preference thresholds for sweet amino acids l-glutamine, l-alanine and l-threonine, monosaccharides glucose and fructose, and maltooligosaccharide. These data suggest that differences in gustatory responsiveness are an important factor underlying higher consumption of some amino acids and carbohydrates by B6 mice compared with 129 mice. It is likely that in B6 mice, higher sweet taste responsiveness results in increased consumption of sweet-tasting amino acids and sugars, and higher taste responsiveness to complex carbohydrates results in increased consumption of maltooligosaccharide. However, postingestive processes also influence nutrient consumption and may be responsible for higher intake of carbohydrates compared with sweet-tasting amino acids. Results of this study set the stage for genetic analysis of differences between B6 and 129 mice in taste responsiveness and macronutrient consumption.     

Taste perception of monosodium glutamate and inosine monophosphate by129P3/J and C57BL/6ByJ mice

Our previous studies have shown that in long-term two-bottle preference tests, mice from the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) inbred strain drink more monosodium glutamate (MSG) and inosine monophosphate (IMP) than mice from the 129P3/J (129) inbred strain. The goal of this study was to examine whether this variation in consumption could be attributed to strain differences in perception of the taste quality of MSG and IMP. We developed a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in B6 and 129 mice to 100 mM MSG or 10 mM IMP and used a brief-access taste assay to examine CTA generalization. B6 and 129 mice did not differ in the generalization patterns following CTA to MSG: mice from both strains generalized CTA from MSG to NaCl. In contrast, strain differences in the generalization patterns were evident following the CTA to IMP: while mice from both strains generalized CTA from IMP to MSG, 129 mice tended to have stronger CTA generalization to saccharin and d-tryptophan, both of which are perceived as sweet by humans. These data suggest that the strain differences in MSG consumption are not due to variation in perception of the taste quality of MSG. Instead, the differential intake of IMP likely reflects strain differences in the way the taste quality of IMP is perceived. Our data suggest that mice perceive MSG and IMP as complex taste stimuli: some taste components are shared between these two substances, but their relative intensity seems to be different for MSG and IMP. The amiloride-sensitive salt taste component is more prevalent in MSG than in IMP taste, and in B6 compared with 129 mice.     

Intake of ethanol,sodium chloride,sucrose, citric acid,and quinine hydrochloride solutions by mice: A genetic analysis

Mice of the 129/J (129) and C57BL/6ByJ (B6) strains and their reciprocal F₁ and F₂ hybrids were offered solutions of ethanol, sucrose, citric acid, quinine hydrochloride, and NaCl in two-bottle choice tests. Consistent with earlier work, the B6 mice drank more ethanol, sucrose, citric acid, and quinine hydrochloride solution and less NaCl solution than did 129 mice. Analyses of each generation's means and distributions showed that intakes of ethanol, quinine, sucrose, and NaCl were influenced by a few genes. The mode of inheritance was additive in the case of ethanol and quinine, for sucrose the genotype of the 129 strain was recessive, and for NaCl it was dominant. Citric acid intake appeared to be influenced by many genes with small effects, with the 129 genotype dominant. Correlations of sucrose consumption with ethanol and citric acid consumption were found among mice of the F₂ generation, and the genetically determined component of these correlations was stronger than the component related to environmental factors. The genetically determined correlation between sucrose and ethanol intakes is consistent with the hypothesis that the higher ethanol intake by B6 mice depends, in part, on higher hedonic attractiveness of its sweet taste component.     

Operant responding for sucrose by rats bred for high or low saccharin consumption

The use of rats differing in the intake of sweet substances has highlighted some interesting parallels between taste preferences and drug self-administration. For example, rats selectively bred to consume high (HiS) or low (LoS) amounts of a 0.1% saccharin solution (when compared to water consumption), show corresponding differences across several measures of cocaine self-administration (HiS > LoS). In this study, we measured whether the two strains also differ when response requirements are imposed for obtaining a sucrose reinforcer. Male HiS and LoS rats were measured for operant responding for sucrose pellets under fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of 1, 3, 5 and 10 and under a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule, during which the response requirement for each successive pellet increased exponentially. The effect of systemic naltrexone (0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg) on PR responding for sucrose pellets was also tested. Under all FR and PR schedules, the number of pellets obtained by the LoS rats were significantly lower than those obtained by the HiS rats. Although the LoS weighed more than the HiS rats, this difference does not appear to explain differences in operant behavior. No strain differences in the effect of naltrexone were observed; the 3 mg/kg dose reduced the number of pellets obtained in both strains. Measures of locomotor activity taken prior to operant trials suggest that the differences in responding were not due to differences in general activity levels. These studies provide further characterization of the HiS and LoS rat lines by demonstrating that motivation to consume sucrose is greater in HiS than in LoS rats.     

Operant licking in rabbits for intraoral injection of basic types of tastants

In order to compare and contrast hedonic properties of 0.75 M NaCl and 0.5 M sucrose used in behavioral electrophysiology of taste, tests were carried out of evoked patterns of orolingual response and operant licking on a FR-32 schedule to discrete intraoral injections of these stimuli and other basic types of tastants. In tests of taste reactivity, NaCl and sucrose evoked quantitatively similar numbers of orolingual response in excess of those evoked by water. NaCl was also similar to sucrose in amount of operant licking generated at the outset of the test session. Both of these stimuli were more effective than either 0.02 M HCl, 0.01 M QHCl, or water. The NaCl also did not have the suppressant effect of HCl when alternated with sucrose as the reinforcement for licking. NaCl differed from sucrose in sustaining operant licking. While NaCl would appear to share the same basic hedonic value of sucrose, long-term associative processes pertaining to postingestional consequences of fluid input and short-term sensory processes may act to limit behavioral responsivity for concentrated NaCl. Additional information was obtained on operant licking for sodium saccharin.     

Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and incentive value measured by progressive ratio licking in rats

Rats develop strong preferences for flavors associated with the postingestive actions of glucose and other nutrients. This preference may involve changes in both the hedonic appeal and incentive salience of the nutrient-paired flavor. The present study used a progressive ratio (PR) operant licking task to evaluate the degree to which nutrient conditioning changes the incentive value of flavors. Food restricted rats were trained to associate one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) with intragastric glucose infusions and another flavored solution (CS-) with water infusions. The rats subsequently showed a strong preference for the CS+ in two-bottle tests and also licked more for the CS+ than CS- in PR tests. PR licking for the CS+ was similar to that for an 8% fructose solution. Together with earlier data indicating that the CS- is isopreferred to a 3% fructose solution, these findings indicate that IG glucose conditioning enhances the hedonic and incentive value of the CS+ solution so that the animal responds as if the solution had a sweeter taste.     

Sex differences in behavioral taste responses to and ingestion of sucrose and NaCl solutions by rats

Sex differences in the ingestion of food and concentrated NaCl solutions by rats have been investigated for more than a quarter of a century, though the underlying mechanism(s) and the role of reproductive hormones remain the subject of debate. We hypothesized that sex differences in the ingestion of sucrose and NaCl solutions are attributable, in part, to sex differences in taste responses/taste perception. We employed short-access, 10-s tests along with 18-h, two-bottle preference tests to examine sex differences in sensitivity to and ingestion of sucrose and NaCl solutions. To evaluate the role of estrogen, we ovariectomized (OVX) female rats and then used an estrogen-replacement schedule that mimics the pattern of fluctuation of estrogen levels in intact female rats. We observed striking sex differences in the rate of licking NaCl mixed in a dilute sucrose solution. Compared to males, OVX rats with or without estrogen licked at higher rates to more concentrated NaCl solutions, suggesting that female rats are less sensitive to concentrated NaCl solutions. Although less pronounced, we also observed sex differences in the rate of licking to sucrose, particularly at lower concentrations. Compared to males, OVX rats with or without estrogen licked less, suggesting that female rats are less sensitive to lower concentrations of sucrose. Estrogen appeared to play, at most, a small role in mediating taste responses to specific concentrations of sucrose in these testing procedures. Nonetheless, sex differences in taste responses were clear, and it seems likely that such differences underlie, in part, observed differences in ingestion.     

Preabsorptive vs. postabsorptive control of ethanol intake in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice

Experimentally naive male mice of both strains were exposed to a two-bottle choice situation (ethanol vs. water) and their drinking behavior was observed during the first hour. DBA/2J mice developed a significant avoidance of 2% or 10% ethanol during the first 10 min. At 15 and 60 min following introduction of the bottles, no DBA mouse exhibited more than a 6 mg % blood ethanol level while all of the C57BL mice exceeded this concentration. Significant postabsorptive effects in the DBA mice seem unlikely at these very low blood ethanol values. Animals of both strains were examined for their ability to form lithium-induced conditioned taste aversions to 2% ethanol or 15% sucrose solutions. DBA mice readily formed conditioned aversions to both solutions, but the C57BL strain significantly avoided only the sucrose. C57BL mice appear to have difficulty in discriminating the 2% ethanol from distilled water. The neural sensitivity to ethanol was examined in both strains using the sleep time test and the grid test. C57BL mice were significantly more sensitive than DBA mice in both tests.     

Contribution of orosensory stimulation to strain differences in oil intake by mice

Little is known about why animals differ in daily intake of oils. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the oral acceptability of oil is a key determinant of daily intake. To this end, we examined short- and long-term ingestive responses of eight mouse strains (FVB/NJ, SWR/J, SM/J, C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, 129P3/J, DBA/2J and AKR/J) to Intralipid™, a stable emulsion of soybean oil. In Experiment 1, we compared orosensory responsiveness (as indicated by initial licking rates) of eight mouse strains to a range of concentrations of Intralipid and sucrose. We included sucrose because there are two natural alleles of Tas1r3 (the gene that encodes the T1R3 sweet taste receptor), and strains with the Tas1r3^Sac-b allele exhibit higher daily intake of sucrose and oil than strains with the Tas1r3^Sac-d allele. All strains exhibited concentration-dependent increases in lick rates for both sucrose and Intralipid, but the extent of these increases varied greatly across strains. The strains with the Tas1r3^Sac-b allele licked more vigorously for sucrose at concentrations ≤ 0.3 M, but not for Intralipid at any concentration. In Experiment 2, we ran the mice through 24-h preference tests, in which they had a choice between water and each of four concentrations of Intralipid (1, 5, 10 and 20%). The strains differed greatly in daily intake of Intralipid, particularly at the 1 and 5% concentrations. Regression analyses revealed that strain differences in orosensory responsiveness reliably predicted strain differences in daily intake of 1 and 5% Intralipid, but not 10 or 20% Intralipid. These findings indicate (i) that Tas1r3 genotype does not modulate orosensory stimulation from oil, (ii) that orosensory stimulation contributes to strain differences in daily intake of dilute oil emulsions, but not concentrated ones, and (iii) that daily intake of concentrated oil emulsions is controlled primarily by post-oral satiety mechanisms.     

Hunger and satiety in genetically obese mice (C57BL/6J-ob/ob)

To determine the mechanism for hyperphagia in genetically obese mice (C57BL/6J-ob/ob), several experiments were conducted on the ability of these mice to respond to caloric deficits and surpluses. Presentation of food or sugar reduces subsequent operant licking in both obese and lean mice. When given sugar solutions, evaporated milk, or sweetened non-fat milk, both obese and lean mice reduce food intake to compensate for the calories obtained from the solutions. These findings indicate that genetically obese mice respond normally to caloric surpluses. Obese mice respond to food deprivation (caloric deficit) by increasing subsequent food intake but they do so more slowly than controls.     

Taste reactivity and its modulation by morphine and methamphetamine in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice

C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA2/J (D2) mice differ markedly in voluntary consumption of tastants and responses to abused drugs. In particular, compared to D2 mice, B6 mice avidly drink ethanol and sucrose solutions, but avoid quinine solutions. In the first study, we compared taste reactivity in B6 and D2 mice to determine the extent to which differences in drinking patterns depend on orosensory processing. Both strains showed concentration-dependent increases in positive reactions to sucrose (0.01 to 1 M). Quinine (0.03 to 3 mM) elicited concentration-dependent aversive reactions in B6 mice, whereas all reactions to quinine were virtually indistinguishable from reactions to water in D2 mice. In contrast, D2 mice reacted with relatively strong aversive responses to ethanol (5 to 30%). In the second study, we evaluated the effect of subcutaneous morphine (1 to 4 mg/kg) and methamphetamine (0.5 to 2 mg/kg) on taste reactivity to sucrose. Morphine generally decreased reactions to sucrose in both strains, suggesting a general motor depressant effect. Methamphetamine shifted sucrose responses towards aversion in both strains; particularly in D2 mice. These results suggest that strain-dependent differences in voluntary ethanol and quinine drinking depend at least partially on differences in orosensory responses. However, differences in voluntary sucrose intake may relate solely to genetic differences in post-ingestive factors. Finally, as has been suggested by previous place conditioning studies, methamphetamine appears to induce a dysphoric state in D2 mice, which may be reflected in fewer positive and more negative taste reactions to sucrose in the current study.     

Chorda tympani responses in two inbred strains of mice with different taste preferences.

Behavioral studies suggest that there are significant differences in the taste systems of the inbred mouse (Mus musculus) strains: C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2). In an attempt to understand the biological basis of the behavioral differences, we recorded whole-nerve chorda tympani responses to taste solutions and compared the results to intake of similar solutions in nondeprived mice. Stimuli included a test series composed of 0.1 M sodium chloride, 0.3 M sucrose, 10 mM sodium saccharin, 3 mM hydrochloric acid, and 3 mM quinine hydrochloride, as well as concentration series for the same substances. Neural activity of the chorda tympani that was evoked by sucrose, saccharin, or NaCl was greater in B6 than D2 mice; and neural threshold for sucrose was lower in B6 mice, but neural thresholds for HCl and quinine were lower in D2 mice. B6 mice drank more sucrose and saccharin but less quinine than D2 mice; thus, sucrose and saccharin preference were positively correlated, but NaCl and quinine aversiveness were negatively correlated with the chorda tympani results. Nonetheless, genes involved in the structuring of taste receptors and/or the chordae tympani, which transduce taste stimuli having diverse perceptual qualities, differ for the two mouse strains.     

The inhibitory potency of SCH 23390 and raclopride on licking for sucrose increases across brief-access tests

There is extensive pharmacological and microdialysis evidence that central dopamine mechanisms are important for the mediation of the rewarding and reinforcing functions of sweet taste. One aspect of the pharmacological evidence for dopaminergic mediation of sweet reward is unclear. That is the positive interactive effect of ingestive experience and DA antagonist treatment reported by Wise and his colleagues in 1978 [1]. They showed that the inhibitory potency of pimozide increased over repetitive tests of saccharin (0.1%) ingestion. When pimozide was given before 8 daily, 10-minute tests in rats licking [2] or lever pressing [3] for 32% sucrose, however, the inhibitory effect of pimozide did not increase across tests. To reinvestigate the problem, we used a computer-assisted, repetitive, brief-access technique [4, 5] in which 10 male, non-deprived, Sprague Dawley rats licked 0.5 M sucrose for 60 s in four trials with a 30-second intertrial interval. Thirty minutes before the first trial, each rat received an ip injection of the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, the D2/3 antagonist raclopride, or vehicle. SCH 23390 and raclopride decreased licking significantly, their inhibitory effects increased significantly within and across the 4 trials, and the temporal pattern of their inhibitory effects on latencies, and on cumulative and total licks was different. Thus we confirm an increase of the inhibitory potency of DA antagonists across ingestive tests and show for the first time that the interaction differs between D1 and D2/3 antagonists.