Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 valve to treat aortic regurgitation: The French multicentre S3AR study

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation now has a major role in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, evidence is scarce on its feasibility and safety to treat patients with pure aortic regurgitation.AimsWe sought to evaluate the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in patients with pure aortic regurgitation on native non-calcified valves.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective and prospective French multicentre observational study. We included all patients with symptomatic severe pure aortic regurgitation on native non-calcified valves, contraindicated to or at high risk for surgical valve replacement, who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve.ResultsA total of 37 patients (male sex, 73%) with a median age of 81 years (interquartile range 69–85 years) were screened using transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography and were included at eight French centres. At baseline, 83.8% of patients (n = 31) had dyspnoea New York Heart Association class ≥ III. The device success rate was 94.6% (n = 35). At 30 days, the all-cause mortality rate was 8.1% (n = 3) and valve migration occurred in 10.8% of cases (n = 4). Dyspnoea New York Heart Association class ≤ II was seen in 86.5% of patients (n = 32), and all survivors had aortic regurgitation grade ≤ 1. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 16.2% (n = 6), 89.7% (n = 26/29) of survivors were in New York Heart Association class ≤ II and all had aortic regurgitation grade ≤ 2.ConclusionTranscatheter aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve seems promising to treat selected high-risk patients with pure aortic regurgitation on non-calcified native valves, contraindicated to surgical aortic valve replacement.     

Early pacemaker insertion after aortic valve replacement with an Edwards Intuity sutureless valve

BackgroundPostoperative conduction disorders are serious adverse events in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, and may prolong the duration of hospitalization and require pacemaker insertion.AimOur aim was to evaluate the rate of pacemaker insertion after implantation of an Edwards Intuity sutureless aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) compared with a standard surgical bioprosthesis.MethodsThis retrospective single-centre study included patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with an Intuity sutureless aortic valve or a standard bioprosthetic valve between 4 June 2014 and 27 June 2016. The main outcome criterion was the rate of postoperative pacemaker insertion. Secondary outcome criteria included the rate of new conduction disorders, the rate of atrial arrhythmia or paroxysmal conduction disorders, mortality and duration of hospital stay.ResultsNinety-three patients received an Intuity sutureless aortic valve (median age 76 years, interquartile range 71–80 years), and 176 were implanted with a standard biological aortic valve (median age 73 years, interquartile range 68–79 years; P = 0.007). The rate of postoperative pacemaker insertion, after adjustment, was 22.44% in the Intuity group and 5.66% in the standard aortic valve group (P = 0.030). The main indications for postoperative pacemaker insertion were complete atrioventricular block and left bundle branch block with prolongation of the H-V interval. The rate of new postoperative left bundle branch block conduction disorders was significantly higher in patients implanted with an Intuity valve (odds ratio 5.28, 95% confidence interval 1.59 to 23.05; P = 0.012).ConclusionHigher rates of pacemaker insertion and new conduction disorders were observed in patients implanted with an Intuity sutureless bioprosthesis compared with those who received a standard surgical aortic valve.     

Resultados clínicos tempranos tras el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica por acceso transaxilar comparado con el acceso transfemoral. Datos del registro español de TAVI

Introduction and objectivesTransaxillary access (TXA) has become the most widely used alternative to transfemoral access (TFA) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to compare total in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients included in the Spanish TAVI registry who were treated by TXA or TFA access.MethodsWe analyzed data from patients treated with TXA or TFA and who were included in the TAVI Spanish registry. In-hospital and 30-day events were defined according to the recommendations of the Valve Academic Research Consortium. The impact of the access route was evaluated by propensity score matching according to clinical and echocardiogram characteristics.ResultsA total of 6603 patients were included; 191 (2.9%) were treated via TXA and 6412 via TFA access. After adjustment (n = 113 TXA group and n = 3035 TFA group) device success was similar between the 2 groups (94%, TXA vs 95%, TFA; P = .95). However, compared with the TFA group, the TXA group showed a higher rate of acute myocardial infarction (OR, 5.3; 95%CI, 2.0-13.8); P = .001), renal complications (OR, 2.3; 95%CI, 1.3-4.1; P = .003), and pacemaker implantation (OR, 1.6; 95%CI, 1.01-2.6; P = .03). The TXA group also had higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates (OR, 2.2; 95%CI, 1.04-4.6; P = .039 and OR, 2.3; 95%CI, 1.2-4.5; P = .01, respectively).ConclusionsCompared with ATF, TXA is associated with higher total mortality, both in-hospital and at 30 days. Given these results, we believe that TXA should be considered only in those patients who are not suitable candidates for TFA.     

La técnica de superposición de cúspides en TAVI con dispositivo autoexpandible optimiza la profundidad del implante y reduce la necesidad de marcapasos permanente

Introduction and objectivesThis study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of modifying the classic implantation technique for aortic transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation to a cusp-overlap-projection (COP) technique to achieve a higher implantation depth and to reduce the burden of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) at 30 days. Aortic self-expanding THV carries an elevated risk for PPMI. A higher implantation depth minimizes the damage in the conduction system and may reduce PPMI rates.MethodsFrom March 2017, 226 patients were consecutively included: 113 patients were treated using the COP implantation technique compared with the previous 113 consecutive patients treated using the classic technique. In all patients, implantation depth was assessed by 3 methods (noncoronary cusp to the THV, mean of the noncoronary cusp and the left coronary cusp to the THV, and the deepest edge from the left coronary cusp and the noncoronary cusp to the THV).ResultsThe COP group had a lower implantation depth than the group treated with the classic technique (4.8 mm ± 2.2 vs 5.7 mm ± 3.1; P = .011; 5.8 mm ± 3.1 vs 6.5 mm ± 2.4; P = .095; 7.1 mm ± 2.8 vs 7.4 mm ± 3.2; P = .392). Forty patients (17.7%) required a new PPMI after the 30-day follow-up but this requirement was significantly lower in the COP group (12.4% vs 23%, P = .036). The COP implantation technique consistently protected against the main event (OR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.21-0.97; P = .043), with similar procedural success rates and complications.ConclusionsThe COP implantation technique is a simple modification of the implantation protocol and provides a higher implantation depth of self-expanding-THV with lower conduction disturbances and PPMI rates.     

Prótesis percutáneas autoexpandibles para la estenosis aórtica: resultados a corto plazo y comparación hemodinámica tras emparejamiento

Introduction and objectivesAortic self-expandable (SE) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices are particularly useful for patients with aortic stenosis and small/tortuous vessels, small aortic annuli, or low coronary ostia. However, it is unclear whether the growing range of SE devices shows comparable hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. We aimed to determine the differential hemodynamic (residual valve area and regurgitation) and clinical outcomes of these devices in comparable scenarios.MethodsAll patients were enrolled from 4 institutions and were managed with 4 different SE TAVI devices. Baseline and follow-up clinical data were collected and echocardiographic tests blindly and centrally analyzed. Patients were compared according to valve type and a 1:1 matched comparison was performed according to degree of calcification, aortic annulus dimensions, left ventricular ejection fraction, and body surface area.ResultsIn total, 514 patients were included (Evolut R/PRO, 217; ACURATE neo, 107; ALLEGRA, 102; Portico, 88). Surgical risk scores were comparable in the unmatched population. No differences were observed in the post-TAVI regurgitation rate and in in-hospital mortality (2.7%). The rate of pacemaker implantation at discharge was significantly different among devices (P = .049), with Portico showing the highest rate (23%) and ACURATE neo the lowest (9.5%); Evolut R/PRO and ALLEGRA had rates of 15.9% and 21.2%, respectively. The adjusted comparison showed worse residual TAVI gradients and aortic valve area with ACURATE neo vs ALLEGRA (P = .001) but the latter had higher risk of valve embolization and a tendency for more cerebrovascular events.ConclusionsA matched comparison of 4 SE TAVI devices showed no differences regarding residual aortic regurgitation and in-hospital mortality.     

Prior Balloon Valvuloplasty Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the DIRECTAVI Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate device success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using new-generation balloon-expandable prostheses with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV).BackgroundRandomized studies are lacking comparing TAVR without BAV against the conventional technique of TAVR with BAV.MethodsDIRECTAVI (Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) was an open-label noninferiority study that randomized patients undergoing TAVR using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve with or without prior balloon valvuloplasty. The primary endpoint was the device success rate according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria, which was evaluated using a 7% noninferiority margin. The secondary endpoint included procedural and 30-day adverse events.ResultsDevice success was recorded for 184 of 236 included patients (78.0%). The rate of device success in the direct implantation group (n = 97 [80.2%]) was noninferior to that in the BAV group (n = 87 [75.7%]) (mean difference 4.5%; 95% confidence interval: −4.4% to 13.4%; p = 0.02 for noninferiority). No severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or severe aortic regurgitation occurred in any group. In the direct implantation group, 7 patients (5.8%) required BAV to cross the valve. Adverse events were related mainly to pacemaker implantation (20.9% in the BAV group vs. 19.0% in the direct implantation group; p = 0.70). No significant difference was found between the 2 strategies in duration of procedure, contrast volume, radiation exposure, or rate of post-dilatation.ConclusionsDirect TAVR without prior BAV was noninferior to the conventional strategy using BAV with new-generation balloon-expandable valves, but without procedural simplification. BAV was needed to cross the valve in a few patients, suggesting a need for upstream selection on the basis of patient anatomy. (TAVI Without Balloon Predilatation [of the Aortic Valve] SAPIEN 3 [DIRECTAVI]; NCT02729519)     

Evaluación multicéntrica del sobredimensionamiento de la prótesis transcatéter SAPIEN 3. Impacto en el fallo del dispositivo y nuevos implantes de marcapasos

Introduction and objectivesA certain degree of prosthesis oversizing (OS) is recommended for the SAPIEN 3 to achieve device success. However, an increase in OS may increase permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates. We therefore investigated the influence of OS on device failure and PPI.MethodsA total of 804 patients were treated with SAPIEN 3 at 3 centers. Multislice computed tomography-derived OS was calculated and analyzed both as a continuous variable and categorized in 5% increments with −4% to 0% as reference.ResultsDevice failure occurred in 8.8% of patients. Median OS was lower in patients with device failure vs those with device success (+4% vs +8%; P = .038). A nonlinear risk pattern was shown for OS with a significantly reduced device failure rate within 4% to +22% of OS. There was no case of paravalvular leakage II+ between +10% to +20% of OS. The overall PPI rate was 16.2% and the median OS was significantly larger in patients with PPI (PPI: +9% vs no PPI: +7%; P = .025), while implantation depth did not vary in patients with vs without PPI (6.9 ± 1.7 mm vs 6.6 ± 1.9 mm; P = .101). The risk of PPI increased with increasing OS and was highest in the 2 highest categories.ConclusionsAn increase in OS reduces the risk for device failure but increases the risk for PPI. There was no ideal range of OS to minimize both device failure and PPI.Full English text available from: www.revespcardiol.org/en     

Factibilidad del alineamiento comisural y coronario precisos con TAVI balón-expandible

Introduction and objectivesWe aimed to describe the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of commissural alignment (CA) for the balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve.MethodsThe relationship among native commissures and transcatheter aortic valve implantation neocommissures was analyzed in 10 consecutive patients with tricuspid severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation after guided implantation based on computed tomography analysis with a self-developed software. CA was predicted by in silico bio-modelling in the 10 patients and the calculated rotation was applied during crimping. Degrees of CA and coronary overlap (CO) were measured through 1-month follow up computed tomography. Transvalvular residual gradients and the rate of paravalvular leak were also analyzed.ResultsMean commissural misalignment was 16.7 ± 8°. Four patients showed mild misalignment but none of them showed a moderate or severe degree of misalignment. The in silico model accurately predicted the final in vivo position with a correlation coefficient of 0.983 (95%CI, 0.966-0.992), P < .001. Severe CO with right coronary ostium occurred in 3 patients likely due to ostial eccentricity, and CO was not present with the left coronary artery in any of the patients. Mean transaortic gradient was 6.1 ± 3.3 mmHg and there were no moderate-severe paravalvular leaks.ConclusionsPatient-specific rotation during valve crimping based on preprocedural computed tomography is feasible with balloon-expandable devices and is associated with the absence of moderate or severe commissural misalignment and left main CO.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en     

Resultados intrahospitalarios tras tratamiento percutáneo frente a quirúrgico en pacientes con estenosis aórtica y enfermedad arterial coronaria concomitante

Introduction and objectivesConcomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent among aortic stenosis patients; however the optimal therapeutic strategy remains debated. We investigated periprocedural outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with percutaneous coronary intervention (TAVI/PCI) vs surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (SAVR/CABG) for aortic stenosis with CAD.MethodsUsing discharge data from the Spanish National Health System, we identified 6194 patients (5217 SAVR/CABG and 977 TAVI/PCI) between 2016 and 2019. Propensity score matching was adjusted for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications and 30-day cardiovascular readmission.ResultsMatching resulted in 774 pairs. In-hospital all-cause mortality was more common in the SAVR/CABG group (3.4% vs 9.4%, P < .001) as was periprocedural stroke (0.9% vs 2.2%; P = .004), acute kidney injury (4.3% vs 16.0%, P < .001), blood transfusion (9.6% vs 21.1%, P < .001), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (0.1% vs 1.7%, P = .001). Permanent pacemaker implantation was higher for matched TAVI/PCI (12.0% vs 5.7%, P < .001). Lower volume centers (< 130 procedures/y) had higher in-hospital all-cause mortality for both procedures: TAVI/PCI (3.6% vs 2.9%, P < .001) and SAVR/CABG (8.3 vs 6.8%, P < .001). Thirty-day cardiovascular readmission did not differ between groups.ConclusionsIn this large contemporary nationwide study, percutaneous management of aortic stenosis and CAD with TAVI/PCI had lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity than surgical intervention. Higher volume centers had less in-hospital mortality in both groups. Dedicated national high-volume heart centers warrant further investigation.     

Predictores e impacto pronóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca tras el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica con una prótesis autoexpandible

Introduction and objectivesThe purpose of this analysis was to assess the incidence, predictors and prognostic impact of acute heart failure (AHF) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a self-expanding prosthesis.MethodsFrom November 2008 to June 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in our center were prospectively included in our TAVI registry. The predictive effect of AHF on all-cause mortality following the TAVI procedure was analyzed using Cox regression models.ResultsA total of 399 patients underwent TAVI with a mean age of 82.4 ± 5.8 years, of which 213 (53.4%) were women. During follow-up (27.0 ± 24.1 months), 29.8% (n  =  119) were admitted due to AHF, which represents a cumulative incidence function of 13.2% (95%CI, 11.1%-15.8%). At the end of follow-up, 150 patients (37.59%) had died. Those who developed AHF showed a significantly higher mortality rate (52.1% vs 31.4%; HR, 1.84; 95%CI, 1.14-2.97; P  =  .012). Independent predictors of AHF after TAVI were a past history of heart failure (P = .019) and high Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (P = .004). We found that nutritional risk index and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were strongly correlated with outcomes in the AHF group.ConclusionsTAVI was associated with a high incidence of clinical AHF. Those who developed AHF had higher mortality. Pre-TAVI AHF and high Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were the only independent predictors of AHF in our cohort. A low nutritional risk index and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were independent markers of mortality in the AHF group.     

Outcomes of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency

BackgroundResults and durability of aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis are well known, but no study has focused on the results of aortic valve replacement in aortic insufficiency.AimThe aim of this retrospective study was to describe our mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency.MethodsAll consecutive adult patients who underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency at two European centres (in France and Germany) between May 2005 and December 2020 were analysed.ResultsDuring the study period, 289 patients were included. Mean age was 56.9 ± 12.5 years. Overall operative mortality was 1.5%, and the 10-year survival estimate rate was 75.0%, which was significantly lower than in the age- and sex-matched general population, with a standardized mortality ratio of 2.88 (95% confidence interval 1.96–4.08; P < 0001). Freedom from aortic valve-related death was 87.6%, and from aortic valve-related reoperation was 87.4%. No patient aged > 60 years was reoperated on during follow-up. Freedom from severe structural valve deterioration at 10 years was 73.3%, and freedom from moderate structural valve deterioration at 10 years was 50.3%. Freedom from major adverse valve-related events at 10 years was 69.7%.ConclusionsAlthough bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency shows good early results, 10-year mortality and major adverse valve-related event rates in young patients may be a concern, with a reduction in life expectancy compared with the general population.     

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair following surgical valve repair with ring implantation: Results from the multicentre “Clip-in-Ring” registry

BackgroundManagement of mitral regurgitation recurrence after failed surgical valve repair with ring implantation is controversial.AimTo describe the French experience regarding midterm safety and efficacy of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) in patients with failed surgical valve repair with ring implantation.MethodsThe “Clip-in-Ring” registry is a multicentre registry conducted in 11 centres in France, approved by local institutional review boards, of consecutive TEER following surgical valve repair with ring implantation. Outcomes were Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) technical success, modified 30-day device and procedural success (where 10 mmHg is considered as a cut-off for significant mitral stenosis) and MVARC complications.ResultsTwenty-three patients were studied: mean age, 69 ± 10 years; male sex, 74%; EuroSCORE II, 16 ± 17; left ventricular ejection fraction, 53 ± 12%; mitral regurgitation grade 3+/4+, 17%/78%; New York Heart Association class III/IV, 47%/22%; median surgery to TEER delay, 23 (6–94) months. Technical success was 100%. At discharge, residual mitral regurgitation grade was ≤ 2+ in 87% and median transmitral gradient was 4 (3–5) mmHg. Thirty-day modified MVARC device and procedural success was 82%: four patients (17%) had residual mitral regurgitation grade > 2+, including two patients who needed complementary surgery. No patient had a 30-day transmitral gradient > 7 mmHg. No patient died or had a stroke or any life-threatening complications. One patient presented a vascular access complication requiring transfusion. No other MVARC-2 adverse event was reported.ConclusionsTEER in patients with failed mitral ring is feasible and safe. Further studies should delineate its exact role in the therapeutic armamentarium for this medical issue.     

Alineamiento comisural preciso durante el TAVI con ACURATE neo. Prueba de concepto

Introduction and objectivesFinal position of the neo-commissures is uncontrolled during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), potentially hindering coronary access and future procedures. We aimed to develop a standard method to achieve commissural alignment with the ACURATE neo valve.MethodsThe relationship between native and TAVI neo-commissures was analyzed in 11 severe aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVI. Based on computed tomography analysis, an in silico model was developed to predict final TAVI commissural posts position. A modified implantation technique, accurate commissural alignment (ACA) and a dedicated delivery system were developed. TAVI implants were tested in 3-dimensional (3D) printed models and in vivo. Commissural misalignment and coronary overlap (CO) were analyzed.ResultsThe in silico model accurately predicted final position of commissural posts irrespective of the implantation technique performed (correlation coefficient, 0.994; 95%CI, 0.989-0.998; P < .001). TAVI implant with patient-specific rotation was simulated in 3D printed models and in 9 patients. ACA-oriented TAVI implants presented adequate commissural alignment in vivo (mean commissural misalignment of 7.7 ± 3.9°). None of the ACA oriented implants showed CO, whereas in silico conventional implants predicted CO in 6 of the 9 cases.ConclusionsAccurate commissural alignment of the ACURATE neo device is feasible by inserting the delivery system with a patient-specific rotation based on computed tomography analysis. This is a simple and reproducible method for commissural alignment that can be potentially used for all kinds of TAVI devices.     

Impacto clínico de la extensión del miocardio en riesgo en pacientes sometidos a intervención percutánea de la válvula aórtica

Introduction and objectivesCoronary artery disease (CAD) is found in 30%-50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing treatment. The best management of CAD in AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still unclear. We investigated the clinical impact of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients with concomitant CAD and severe AS treated by TAVI.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent TAVI procedures at our hospital were identified. In the presence of CAD, the myocardium jeopardized before TAVI was graded using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) jeopardy score (JS). The study population was divided in 3 groups: patients without concomitant CAD (no-CAD), patients with CAD and BCIS-JS ≤ 4 (CAD BCIS-JS ≤ 4) and patients with concomitant CAD and BCIS-JS > 4 (CAD BCIS-JS > 4). The primary study endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).ResultsA total of 403 patients entered the study: 223 no-CAD, 94 CAD BCIS-JS ≤ 4 and 86 CAD BCIS-JS > 4. At > 3 months of follow-up [range 104–3296 days], patients without CAD and CAD patients with BCIS-JS ≤ 4 had better survival free from MACCE compared with those with less extensive revascularization (BCIS-JS > 4) (P = .049). This result was driven by a significant reduction in death (P = .031). On multivariate analysis, residual BCIS-JS ≤ 4 and NYHA class III-IV independently predicted MACCE.ConclusionsIn patients with concomitant CAD and severe AS, the extent of jeopardized myocardium before TAVI impacts on clinical outcomes.     

Evaluación multimodal de la degeneración estructural de válvulas percutáneas en el seguimiento a largo plazo

Introduction and objectivesWe assessed the long-term hemodynamic performance of transcatheter heart valve (THV) by paired transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and the incidence, characteristics and factors associated with THV structural valve degeneration (SVD).MethodsA total of 212 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement and had a potential follow-up > 5 years with at least 1 TTE ≥ 1-year postprocedure were included. All patients had a TTE at 1 to 5 years and 36 had another one at 6 to 10 years. SVD was defined as subclinical (increase > 10 mmHg in mean transvalvular gradient +  decrease > 0.3 cm² in valve area and/or new-onset mild or moderate aortic regurgitation) and clinically relevant (increase > 20 mmHg in mean transvalvular gradient + decrease > 0.6 cm² in valve area and/or new-onset moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation). Fifteen patients had a transesophageal echocardiography at the time of SVD diagnosis, and 85 an opportunistic computed tomography examination at 1 (0.5-2) years.ResultsTransvalvular mean gradient increased and valve area decreased over time (P < .01). At 8 years of follow-up, SVD occurred in 30.2% of patients (clinically relevant: 9.3%). Transesophageal echocardiography revealed thickened and reduced-mobility leaflets in 80% and 73% of SVD cases, respectively. No baseline or procedural factors were associated with SVD. THV underexpansion (3.5%) or eccentricity (8.2%) had no impact on valve hemodynamics/SVD at follow-up.ConclusionsA gradual THV hemodynamic deterioration occurred throughout a 10-year period, leading to SVD in ～30% of patients (clinically relevant in < 10%). Leaflet morphology/mobility were frequently impaired in SVD cases, but THV geometry did not influence valve hemodynamics or SVD.     

Valor pronóstico diferencial de la galectina-3 según los valores de antígeno carbohidrato 125 para el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica

Introduction and objectivesGalectin-3 (Gal-3) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) have been associated with adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Experimental data have suggested a potential molecular interaction. Therefore, we assessed the association of Gal-3 and CA125 with prognosis after TAVI.MethodsA total of 439 patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for worsening heart failure after TAVI.ResultsThe primary endpoint occurred in 16.4%. Gal-3 was dichotomized at ≥ 8.71 ng/mL into elevated and not elevated. Gal-3 was elevated in 31.9% and was associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (25% vs 12.4%, HR, 2.26; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, the association of elevated Gal-3 with the primary endpoint was borderline significant (HR, 1.59; P = .068). CA125 was dichotomized at ≥ 18.4 U/mL, accordingly. CA125 was elevated in 51.9% and was also associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (25.4% vs 6.6%, HR, 4.20; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, elevated CA125 (HR, 2.83; P = .001) remained independently associated with the primary endpoint. A differential prognostic effect of Gal-3 was found across CA125 status (P for interaction = .048). Elevated Gal-3 was associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint when CA125 was elevated (38.8% vs 18.2%, HR, 2.02; P = .015) but lacked significance when CA125 was not elevated (6.6% vs 6.7%, HR, 1.16; P = .981).ConclusionsIn patients undergoing TAVI, Gal-3 predicted adverse clinical outcomes only when CA125 was elevated.     

Unsupervised clustering of patients with severe aortic stenosis: A myocardial continuum

BackgroundTraditional statistics, based on prediction models with a limited number of prespecified variables, are probably not adequate to provide an appropriate classification of a condition that is as heterogeneous as aortic stenosis (AS).AimsTo investigate a new classification system for severe AS using phenomapping.MethodsConsecutive patients from a referral centre (training cohort) who met the echocardiographic definition of an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1 cm² were included. Clinical, laboratory and imaging continuous variables were entered into an agglomerative hierarchical clustering model to separate patients into phenogroups. Individuals from an external validation cohort were then assigned to these original clusters using the K nearest neighbour (KNN) function and their 5-year survival was compared after adjustment for aortic valve replacement (AVR) as a time-dependent covariable.ResultsIn total, 613 patients were initially recruited, with a mean ± standard deviation AVA of 0.72 ± 0.17 cm². Twenty-six variables were entered into the model to generate a specific heatmap. Penalized model-based clustering identified four phenogroups (A, B, C and D), of which phenogroups B and D tended to include smaller, older women and larger, older men, respectively. The application of supervised algorithms to the validation cohort (n = 1303) yielded the same clusters, showing incremental cardiac remodelling from phenogroup A to phenogroup D. According to this myocardial continuum, there was a stepwise increase in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio for phenogroup D vs A 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.46–3.26; P < 0.001).ConclusionsArtificial intelligence re-emphasizes the significance of cardiac remodelling in the prognosis of patients with severe AS and highlights AS not only as an isolated valvular condition, but also a global disease.     

5-Year Outcomes Comparing Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare 5-year cardiovascular, renal, and bioprosthetic valve durability outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).BackgroundPatients with severe AS and CKD undergoing TAVR or SAVR are a challenging, understudied clinical subset.MethodsIntermediate-risk patients with moderate to severe CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/m²) from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) 2A trial (patients randomly assigned to SAPIEN XT TAVR or SAVR) and SAPIEN 3 Intermediate Risk Registry were pooled. The composite primary outcome of death, stroke, rehospitalization, and new hemodialysis was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Patients with and without perioperative acute kidney injury (AKI) were followed through 5 years. A core laboratory–adjudicated analysis of structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure was also performed.ResultsThe study population included 1,045 TAVR patients (512 SAPIEN XT, 533 SAPIEN 3) and 479 SAVR patients. At 5 years, SAVR was better than SAPIEN XT TAVR (52.8% vs 68.0%; P = 0.04) but similar to SAPIEN 3 TAVR (52.8% vs 58.7%; P = 0.89). Perioperative AKI was more common after SAVR than TAVR (26.3% vs 10.3%; P < 0.001) and was independently associated with long-term outcomes. Compared with SAVR, bioprosthetic valve failure and stage 2 or 3 structural valve deterioration were significantly greater for SAPIEN XT TAVR (P < 0.05) but not for SAPIEN 3 TAVR.ConclusionsIn intermediate-risk patients with AS and CKD, SAPIEN 3 TAVR and SAVR were associated with a similar risk for the primary endpoint at 5 years. AKI was more common after SAVR than TAVR, and SAPIEN 3 valve durability was comparable with that of surgical bioprostheses.     

Outcomes Following Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: SWEDEHEART Observational Study

ObjectivesThis study was performed to investigate long-term, clinically important outcomes in patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundThe impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR is unknown, and prior studies have produced conflicting results.MethodsIn this nationwide, population-based cohort study, the study included all patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR in Sweden from 2008 to 2018 from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register. Additional baseline characteristics and information about outcomes were obtained by individual crosslinking with other national health data registers. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsOf 3,420 patients, 481 (14.1%) underwent permanent pacemaker implantation within 30 days after TAVR. The survival rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 90.0%, 52.7%, and 10.9% in the pacemaker group and 92.7%, 53.8%, and 15.3% in the nonpacemaker group, respectively (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.88-1.22; P = 0.692). The median follow-up was 2.7 years (interquartile range: 2.5, and maximum 11.8 years). There was no difference in the risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.71-1.18; P = 0.611), heart failure (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.92-1.63; P = 0.157), or endocarditis (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.47-1.69; P = 0.734) between the groups.ConclusionsThe study found no difference in long-term survival between patients who did and did not undergo permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR. As the use of TAVR expands to include younger and low-risk patients with a long life expectancy, it will become increasingly important to understand the impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR.     

El cateterismo cardiaco derecho de esfuerzo predice eventos en los pacientes con estenosis aórtica degenerativa asintomática

Introduction and objectivesDegenerative aortic stenosis (DAS) is the most frequent valvular heart disease. It remains unclear how to identify asymptomatic DAS patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction who have a high probability of event occurrence and would thus benefit from early intervention. Here, we describe a protocol for exercise hemodynamics in true asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe DAS and assess the prognostic value of the data obtained in this population.MethodsThis study involved a prospective single-centre registry of consecutive asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe DAS. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing to confirm symptom absence during exercise and then right heart catheterization (RHC) at rest and during exercise. Events were defined as death, surgical aortic valve replacement, or transcatheter aortic valve implantation according to clinical guidelines.ResultsThirty-three patients underwent baseline and exercise RHC. The mean aortic valve area was 1.08 cm² and the aortic gradient was 39 mmHg. The mean pulmonary artery pressure was 21 mmHg with a pulmonary artery occlusion pressure of 14 mmHg and cardiac output of 5.6 L/min. The mean pulmonary artery pressure at peak exercise was 34 mmHg. After a mean follow-up of 27 months, 8 patients experienced an event (24%). There were no differences in baseline variables, aortic valve area, or cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters between the event and event-free groups. Patients with an event did not have higher pulmonary or filling pressures after peak exercise but had lower pulmonary artery oxygen saturation on effort (median, 48% vs 57%, P = .03).ConclusionsExercise RHC is feasible and safe in this population. Peak pulmonary artery oxygen saturation might identify patients with increased risk of serious adverse events.