Durvalumab for Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

IntroductionIn 2018, durvalumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as consolidation immunotherapy for patients with stage III NSCLC after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, whether durvalumab benefits patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC who completed concurrent CRT. Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who completed CRT with or without durvalumab.ResultsAmong 37 patients, 13 initiated durvalumab a median of 20 days after CRT completion. Two patients completed 12 months of treatment, with five patients discontinuing durvalumab owing to progression and five owing to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Of 24 patients who completed CRT without durvalumab, 16 completed CRT alone and eight completed CRT with induction or consolidation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Median PFS was 10.3 months in patients who received CRT and durvalumab versus 6.9 months with CRT alone (log-rank p = 0.993). CRT and EGFR TKI was associated with a significantly longer median PFS (26.1 mo) compared with CRT and durvalumab or CRT alone (log-rank p = 0.023). Six patients treated with durvalumab initiated EGFR TKIs after recurrence, with one developing grade 4 pneumonitis on osimertinib.ConclusionsIn this study, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC did not benefit with consolidation durvalumab and experienced a high frequency of irAEs. Patients who initiate osimertinib after durvalumab may be susceptible to incident irAEs. Consolidation durvalumab should be approached with caution in this setting and concurrent CRT with induction or consolidation EGFR TKIs further investigated as definitive treatment.     

Korean Real-World Data on Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC Treated With Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy: PACIFIC-KR

IntroductionThis study aimed to investigate real-world evidence for efficacy and safety of durvalumab consolidation (DC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.MethodsPatients with stage III NSCLC who started DC after CRT between September 2018 and December 2020 and were treated at five tertiary hospitals in the Republic of Korea were included. The primary end point was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, and adverse events including radiation pneumonitis (RP) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs).ResultsA total of 157 patients were enrolled. At the median follow-up of 19.1 months, median rwPFS of DC was 25.9 months (95% confidence interval: 16.5–35.4) and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year rwPFS rates were 59.4%, 51.8%, and 43.5%, respectively. The median overall survival was not mature, and objective response rate of DC was 51.0%. High programmed death-ligand 1 expression (≥50%) and development of RP requiring steroid treatment were significantly associated with longer (p = 0.043) and shorter rwPFS (p = 0.036), respectively. RP, RP requiring steroid treatment, and irAEs developed in 57 (36.3%), 42 (26.8%), and 53 (33.8%) patients, respectively. Among peripheral blood cell counts at the initiation of DC, a high derived monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio was the most significant risk factor for the development of RP requiring steroid treatment (OR 44.76, 95% CI: 8.89–225.43, p < 0.001) and irAEs (OR 2.85, 95% CI: 1.27–6.41, p = 0.011).ConclusionsCompared with the outcome of the PACIFIC trial, these real-world data revealed favorable survival benefits of DC after CRT in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Blood-based biomarkers could predict higher-grade RP and irAEs before the initiation of DC.     

Rationale and Design of a Single-Arm,Phase 2, Multi-Center Study of Chemo-Immunotherapy Followed by Hypo-Fractionated RT and Maintenance Immunotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: The DEDALUS Trial

Introduction/BackgroundThis single-arm, phase 2, multi-center, study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a regimen of induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by de-intensified, hypo-fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (RT) given concurrently with durvalumab and maintenance durvalumab in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.Material and methodswe will enroll 45 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, any PD-L1, deemed ineligible for concurrent CRT by a thoracic oncology multidisciplinary team, and candidate to sequential chemoradiation followed by durvalumab.ResultsPrimary endpoint is safety, defined by the incidence of grade 3 and 4 possibly related adverse events (PRAEs) within 6 months from the initiation of treatment. The secondary objectives are PFS and OS (median and 12 months). Ancillary endpoints are molecular response evaluated by cfDNA isolation baseline, after chemo-immuno RT and at progression, and radiomics analysis on CT scans at baseline and before maintenance.ConclusionDEDALUS phase 2 trial explores the safety and efficacy of a novel sequence of chemo-radiation (with de-intensified RT) plus the anti-PD-L1 agent durvalumab in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC who are candidates to sequential chemoradiation plus maintenance immunotherapy.     

Definitive Chemoradiation and Durvalumab Consolidation for Locally Advanced,Unresectable KRAS-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundConsolidation durvalumab immunotherapy following definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves overall survival. As therapeutic options for patients with KRAS-driven disease evolve, more understanding regarding genomic determinants of response and patterns of progression for durvalumab consolidation is needed to optimize outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a single-institutional retrospective analysis of real-world patients with locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC who completed CRT and received durvalumab consolidation. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of durvalumab consolidation between patients with KRAS-mutated and non-mutated tumors. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rates of intrathoracic or extrathoracic progression.ResultsOf 74 response-evaluable patients, 39 had clinical genomic profiling performed. 18 patients had tumors with KRAS mutations, 7 patients had tumors with non-KRAS actionable alterations (EGFR, ALK, ERBB2, BRAF, MET, RET, or ROS1), and 14 patients had tumors without actionable alterations. Median PFS for the overall cohort was 16.1 months. PFS for patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC was 12.6 months versus 12.7 months for patients with non-actionable tumors (P= 0.77, log-rank). Fisher's exact test revealed a statistically significantly higher rate of extrathoracic progression versus intrathoracic-only progression for patients with KRAS-driven disease compared to patients with non-actionable tumors (P= 0.015).ConclusionPatients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC derived similar benefit from durvalumab as patients with non-actionable tumors. A higher rate of extrathoracic progression was also observed among the patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC compared to patients with non-actionable tumors. This highlights the potential unmet needs for novel systemic therapies and surveillance methods for KRAS-mutated stage III NSCLC.     

Brief Report: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis From PACIFIC

IntroductionConsolidation durvalumab (the “PACIFIC regimen”) is standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who have not progressed after chemoradiotherapy, on the basis of data from the phase 3 placebo-controlled PACIFIC study (NCT02125461). Nevertheless, the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with stage III EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC is not well characterized. Here, we report a post hoc exploratory efficacy and safety analysis from a subgroup of patients with EGFRm NSCLC from the PACIFIC.MethodsPatients with stage III unresectable NSCLC and no progression after more than or equal to two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were randomized (2:1) to receive durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks [wk], for up to 1 y) or placebo; stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Enrollment was not restricted by oncogenic driver gene mutation status or programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Patients with NSCLC with an EGFR mutation, determined by local testing only, were included in this subgroup analysis. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; assessed by blinded independent central review) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate and safety. Statistical analyses for the subgroup of patients with EGFRm NSCLC were post hoc and considered exploratory.ResultsOf 713 patients randomized, 35 had locally confirmed EGFRm NSCLC (durvalumab, n = 24; placebo, n = 11). At data cutoff (January 11, 2021), median duration of follow-up for survival was 42.7 months (range: 3.7–74.3 mo) for all randomized patients in the subgroup. Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3–20.7) with durvalumab versus 10.9 months (95% CI: 1.9–not evaluable [NE]) with placebo; hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.39–2.13). Median OS was 46.8 months (95% CI: 29.9–NE) with durvalumab versus 43.0 months (95% CI: 14.9–NE) with placebo; hazard ratio = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.39–2.63). The safety profile of durvalumab was generally consistent with the overall population and known profile for durvalumab.ConclusionsPFS and OS outcomes with durvalumab were similar to placebo for patients with EGFRm tumors, with wide CIs. These data should be interpreted with caution owing to small patient numbers and lack of a prospective study that evaluates clinical outcomes by tumor biomarker status. Further research to determine the optimal treatment for unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC is warranted.     

Role of Consolidation Durvalumab in Patients With EGFR- and HER2-Mutant Unresectable Stage III NSCLC

IntroductionDespite the recent advance of consolidation durvalumab in the treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC, not every patient benefits from durvalumab and the predictive markers of response have been difficult to identify.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with consolidation durvalumab after definitive chemoradiation from January 2018 to March 2020.ResultsA total of 36 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with consolidation durvalumab. Of these patients, 14 had tumor mutations in the ERBB family including 11 EGFR and 3 ERBB2. The ERBB2/EGFR tumor mutation cohort was more likely to be nonsmokers; otherwise, the two groups were similar in age, sex, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and type of previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the ERBB2/EGFR cohort had a significantly shorter disease-free survival compared with the EGFR or ERBB2 wild-type cohort (7.5 mo versus not reached, p = 0.04).ConclusionsConsolidation durvalumab seems to be less efficacious in patients with ERBB2/EGFR-mutant tumors. Future work should seek to evaluate this in the prospective setting and provide insight into the optimal treatment of ERBB2/EGFR-mutant stage III NSCLC.     

Four-Year Survival With Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC—an Update From the PACIFIC Trial

IntroductionIn the Phase 3, placebo-controlled PACIFIC trial of patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC without disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidative durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53–0.87; p = 0.00251; data cutoff, March 22, 2018) and progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.42–65; p < 0.0001; February 13, 2017) with manageable safety. Here, we report updated analyses of OS and PFS, approximately 4 years after the last patient was randomized.MethodsPatients with WHO performance status of 0 or 1 (and any tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status) were randomized (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, administered every 2 weeks (≤12 months), stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. OS and PFS were analyzed using a stratified log-rank test in the intent-to-treat population. Medians and 4-year OS and PFS rates were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsOverall, 709 of 713 randomized patients received durvalumab (n/N=473/476) or placebo (n/N=236/237). As of March 20, 2020 (median follow-up = 34.2 months; range: 0.2–64.9), updated OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57–0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44–0.67) remained consistent with the primary analyses. The median OS for durvalumab was reached (47.5 mo; placebo, 29.1 months). Estimated 4-year OS rates were 49.6% versus 36.3% for durvalumab versus placebo, and 4-year PFS rates were 35.3% versus 19.5% respectively.ConclusionThese updated exploratory analyses demonstrate durable PFS and sustained OS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 49.6% of patients randomized to durvalumab remain alive at 4 years (placebo, 36.3%), and 35.3% remain alive and progression-free (placebo, 19.5%).     

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: A real-world study (HOT2101)

Durvalumab has been administered to patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unclear whether durvalumab benefits these patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with EGFR mutation who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between June 2018 and March 2021. We assessed patient characteristics, efficacy of durvalumab, and durvalumab safety before and after targeted therapy. We collected data on a total of 673 patients, of whom 401 (59.6%) underwent EGFR mutation testing. Fifty-one patients were EGFR positive and 311 were EGFR negative. In the EGFR-positive group, there were higher proportions of females, never-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Of the 51 patients in the positive group and 311 in the negative group who received CRT, 45 (88.2%) and 247 (79.4%) received durvalumab, with median progression-free survival of 23.0 and 24.2 months in the positive and negative groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.64–1.67). The main adverse event was pneumonitis (positive group: 62.2%; 4.4% grade 3; negative group: 62.3%; 6.9% grade 3). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Of the 45 patients in the positive group who received durvalumab, 14 (31.1%) received targeted therapy after durvalumab at the data cutoff. One patient discontinued targeted therapy after developing pneumonitis. In patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC with EGFR mutation, durvalumab after CRT is potentially safe and effective. This may be a suitable treatment sequence for these patients.     

Osimertinib Plus Durvalumab in Patients With EGFR-Mutated,Advanced NSCLC: A Phase 1b,Open-Label,Multicenter Trial

IntroductionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended for EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment. EGFR activation up-regulates programmed death-ligand 1 expression and other immunosuppressive factors in NSCLC, causing immune microenvironment remodeling. Osimertinib (an EGFR TKI) plus durvalumab (programmed death-ligand 1 blockade) was evaluated in the TATTON study (NCT02143466).MethodsThis open-label, phase 1b study enrolled patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In part A, patients who had progressed on a previous EGFR TKI received osimertinib (80 mg once daily) plus durvalumab 3 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. In part B, patients received first-line osimertinib plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. However, part B enrollment was terminated early owing to an increased incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD)-related adverse events (AEs). Safety (primary objective) and preliminary anti-tumor activity determined by objective response rate (ORR), best overall response, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival were evaluated.ResultsBefore enrollment termination, 23 and 11 patients received treatment across parts A and B, respectively. The most common AEs across parts A and B were as follows: diarrhea (50%), nausea (41%), and decreased appetite (35%). A total of 12 patients (35%) reported ILD-related AEs (lung disorder, ILD or pneumonitis). In part A, ORR was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23–66); median DOR was 20.4 months. In part B, ORR was 82% (95% CI: 48–98), median DOR was 7.1 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI: 3.5–12.3).ConclusionsThis study highlighted a potential risk of ILD-related AEs when combining osimertinib with durvalumab. Further research looking to combine EGFR TKIs with immune checkpoint inhibitors should be approached with caution.     

Clinical Outcomes in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Durvalumab After Sequential Or Concurrent Platinum-based Chemoradiotherapy – Single Institute Experience

BackgroundChemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) followed by 12-month durvalumab is the new standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Survival data for patients from everyday routine clinical practice is scarce, as well as potential impact on treatment efficacy of sequential or concomitant chemotherapy and the usage of gemcitabine.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analysed unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who were treated with durvalumab after radical concurrent or sequential chemotherapy (ChT) from December 2017 and completed treatment until December 2020. We assessed progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity regarding baseline characteristic of patients.ResultsEighty-five patients with median age of 63 years of which 70.6% were male, 56.5% in stage IIIB and 58.8% with squamous cell carcinoma, were included in the analysis. Thirty-one patients received sequential ChT only, 51 patients received induction and concurrent ChT and 3 patients received concurrent ChT only. Seventy-nine patients (92.9%) received gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy and switched to etoposide and cisplatin during concurrent treatment with radiotherapy (RT). Patients started durvalumab after a median of 57 days (range 12–99 days) from the end of the RT and were treated with the median of 10.8 (range 0.5–12 months) months. Forty-one patients (48.2%) completed treatment with planned 12-month therapy, 25 patients (29.4%) completed treatment early due to the toxicity and 16 patients (18.8%) due to the disease progression. Median PFS was 22.0 months, 12- and estimated 24-month PFS were 71% (95% CI: 61.2–80.8%) and 45.8% (95% CI: 32.7–58.9%). With the median follow-up time of 23 months (range 2–35 months), median OS has not been reached. Twelve- and estimated 24-month OS were 86.7% (95% CI: 79.5–93.9%) and 68.6% (95% CI: 57.2–79.9%).ConclusionsOur survival data are comparable with published research as well as with recently published real-world reports. Additionally, the regimen with gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy as induction treatment was efficient and well tolerated.Key words: non-small cell lung cancer, stage III, chemoradiotherapy, durvalumab     

Clinical Characteristics,Treatments, and Concurrent Mutations in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With NF1 Mutations

ObjectivesMetastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) is characterized by complex genomic alterations. NF1 mutations may confer distinct clinical characteristics within NSCLC, and real-world evidence on concurrent mutations, treatment patterns, and health outcomes is lacking.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study was performed in patients with mNSCLC treated in the Flatiron Health network who underwent the FoundationOne tumor-sequencing. Anticancer therapies, concurrent mutations, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed.ResultsOf the 1663 patients, 103 patients were identified with NF1 mutation. Concurrent mutations with Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (16.5%) and epidermal growth factor receptor fusion (6.8%) were the most frequent. In patients with NF1 mutation only (n = 57), 42% were women, 86% patients had smoking history, and 70% had non-squamous cell carcinoma type. Most (51%) of the patients with NF1 mutations received a single line of therapy versus other mutations and the overall treated population (44%). Platinum-based chemotherapy was the predominant first-line therapy, with programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand-1 inhibitors as subsequent lines of therapy. The NF1 mutation only group had numerically the shortest median rwPFS (82 days) than other mutation groups. Median OS for the NF1 mutation group in first, second, and third lines of therapy was 321, 498, and 210 days, respectively.ConclusionsNF1 mutations confer distinct clinical characteristics in patients with mNSCLC. These patients may have different trajectories for progression and survival than seen for other mutations, experience less systemic therapy after first-line therapy, and may have shorter survival.     

Durvalumab After Sequential Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III,Unresectable NSCLC: The Phase 2 PACIFIC-6 Trial

IntroductionOn the basis of the findings of the phase 3 PACIFIC trial (NCT02125461), durvalumab is standard of care for patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Many patients are considered unsuitable for cCRT owing to concerns with tolerability. The phase 2 PACIFIC-6 trial (NCT03693300) evaluates the safety and tolerability of durvalumab after sequential CRT (sCRT).MethodsPatients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC and no progression after platinum-based sCRT were enrolled to receive durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously) every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events possibly related to treatment occurring within 6 months. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and overall survival.ResultsOverall, 117 patients were enrolled (59.8% with performance status >0, 65.8% aged ≥65 y, and 37.6% with stage IIIA disease). Median treatment duration was 32.0 weeks; 37.6% of patients remained on treatment at data cutoff (July 15, 2021). Grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 18.8% of patients. Five patients had grade 3 or 4 possibly related adverse events within 6 months (incidence: 4.3%; 95% confidence interval: 1.4–9.7), including two pneumonitis cases. Two patients (1.7%) had grade 5 AEs of any cause. Survival data maturity was limited. Median PFS was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval: 7.3–15.6), and 12-month PFS and overall survival rates were 49.6% and 84.1%, respectively.ConclusionsDurvalumab after sCRT had a comparable safety profile with that observed with durvalumab after cCRT in PACIFIC and had encouraging preliminary efficacy in a frailer population.     

Immunotherapy Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among ALK-Positive Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe treatment landscape for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primarily involves ALK-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a treatment option in NSCLC, the efficacy of ICI is inconclusive in ALK-positive NSCLC as a result of limited data. This retrospective real-world study sought to describe the characteristics of ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with ICI and to assesses treatment outcomes in US oncology practices.Patients and MethodsThis analysis used the Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database and included adult (18 years and older) ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients with receipt of one or more ICIs after January 1, 2015. Median time to ICI discontinuation and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.ResultsOf 83 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with ICIs, 50.6% (n = 42) received ICI without a prior ALK TKI. Median time to ICI discontinuation was 2.17 months (95% confidence interval, 1.41, 3.32). The median rwPFS was 2.34 months (95% confidence interval, 1.55, 3.09); in patients who received an ICI without prior ALK TKI, it was 3.9 months, and in patients who received ICI therapy after an ALK TKI, it was 1.5 months.ConclusionsReal-world effectiveness (rwPFS) of ICIs in ALK-positive NSCLC patients, whether provided before or after TKIs, was limited, underscoring the relative lack of efficacy of ICI in this patient population, particularly compared to approved ALK TKIs.     

Durvalumab After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Unresectable Stage III Non–Small–Cell Lung Cancer (PACIFIC)

BackgroundThe PACIFIC trial demonstrated that consolidation durvalumab significantly improved PFS and OS (the primary endpoints) vs. placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC whose disease had not progressed after platinum-based, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We report exploratory analyses of outcomes from PACIFIC by age.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomized 2:1 (1-42 days post-CRT) to receive 12-months’ durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every-2-weeks) or placebo. We analyzed PFS and OS (unstratified Cox-proportional-hazards models), safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs: symptoms, functioning, and global-health-status/quality-of-life) in subgroups defined by a post-hoc 70-year age threshold. Data cut-off for PFS was February 13, 2017 and for OS, safety and PROs was March 22, 2018.ResultsOverall, 158 of 713 (22.2%) and 555 of 713 (77.8%) randomized patients were aged ≥70 and <70 years, respectively. Durvalumab improved PFS and OS among patients aged ≥70 (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.95]; OS: HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.50-1.22]) and <70 (PFS: HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.42-0.67]; OS: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.87]), although the estimated HR-95% CI for OS crossed one among patients aged ≥70. Durvalumab exhibited a manageable safety profile and did not detrimentally affect PROs vs. placebo, regardless of age; grade 3/4 (41.6% vs. 25.5%) and serious adverse events (42.6% vs. 25.5%) were more common with durvalumab vs. placebo among patients aged ≥70.ConclusionDurvalumab was associated with treatment benefit, manageable safety, and no detrimental impact on PROs, irrespective of age, suggesting that elderly patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC benefit from treatment with consolidation durvalumab after CRT. However, small subgroup sizes and imbalances in baseline factors prevent robust conclusions.     

Utilization and Factors Precluding Receipt of Checkpoint Inhibitor Consolidation for Stage III NSCLC in a Large US Academic Health System

ObjectivesWe sought to determine the proportion of patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who initiate consolidation durvalumab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), as well as reasons for nonreceipt and prognostic implications.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively identified consecutive patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT between October 2017 and December 2021 within a large US academic health system. Patients either received consolidation ICIs (ICI group) or did not (no-ICI group). Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the groups were assessed. Factors predictive of ICI nonreceipt were evaluated using logistic regression.ResultsOf 333 patients who completed cCRT, 229 (69%) initiated consolidation ICIs; 104 (31%) did not. Reasons for ICI nonreceipt included progressive disease post-cCRT (N = 31, 9%), comorbidity or intercurrent illness (N = 25, 8%), cCRT toxicity (N = 23, 7%; 19/23 pneumonitis), and EGFR/ALK alteration (N = 14, 4%). The no-ICI group had worse performance status and a higher rate of baseline pulmonary comorbidity. Larger planning target volume was associated with post-cCRT progressive disease, and higher lung radiation dose with cCRT toxicity. Median OS was 16 months in the no-ICI group and 34.4 months in the ICI group. In the no-ICI group, OS was superior among those with EGFR/ALK alterations (median 44.5 months) and worst among those with progressive disease (median 5.9 months, P < 0.001).Conclusion31% of patients who completed cCRT for stage III NSCLC did not receive consolidation ICIs. Survival amongst these patients is poor, especially for those with progressive disease post-cCRT.     

Induction Immunotherapy Followed by Thoracic Radiation without Chemotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Series

Objective: Although concurrent chemoradiation has been the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to increased survival and decreased disease progression, patients with poor performance status cannot tolerate chemotherapy toxicity well. Durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) / programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis, demonstrated efficacy as maintenance therapy after definitive chemoradiation. However, the role of immunotherapy in those who cannot tolerate chemoradiation is unclear.Methods: This retrospective case series reports adult patients with PD-L1-expressing stage III NSCLC diagnosed at Parkview Cancer Institute from 2019-2021 and treated initially with pembrolizumab followed by sequential consolidation chest radiation (CXRT) without cytotoxic chemotherapy. Results: Four cases of stage IIIA squamous cell carcinoma were disease-controlled by this approach, with two partial and one complete response. One case of stage IIIC adenocarcinoma had progressive disease with brain metastasis prior to CXRT. Conclusion: This case series suggests that pembrolizumab with sequential CXRT may be beneficial for stage III NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression, but additional studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.     

NEPTUNE: Phase 3 Study of First-Line Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC

IntroductionNEPTUNE, a phase 3, open-label study, evaluated first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC).MethodsEligible patients with EGFR and ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomized (1:1) to first-line durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks until progression) plus tremelimumab (1 mg/kg every 4 weeks for up to four doses) or standard chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression (≥25% versus <25%), tumor histologic type, and smoking history. The amended primary end point was overall survival (OS) in patients with blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) greater than or equal to 20 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb and safety and tolerability in all treated patients.ResultsAs of June 24, 2019, 823 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT]); 512 (62%) were bTMB-evaluable, with 129 of 512 (25%) having bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb (durvalumab plus tremelimumab [n = 69]; chemotherapy [n = 60]). Baseline characteristics were balanced in the intention-to-treat. Among patients with bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb, OS improvement with durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.71 [95% confidence interval: 0.49–1.05; p = 0.081]; median OS, 11.7 versus 9.1 months); the hazard ratio for PFS was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.51–1.15; median PFS, 4.2 versus 5.1 months). In the overall safety population, incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 20.7% (durvalumab plus tremelimumab) and 33.6% (chemotherapy).ConclusionsNEPTUNE did not meet its primary end point of improved OS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC and bTMB greater than or equal to 20 mut/Mb. Despite the amended study design, with a resultant small primary analysis population, therapeutic activity was aligned with expectations based on mechanistic biology and previous studies.     

A Population-based Study of Immunotherapy-related Toxicities in Lung Cancer

BackgroundPopulation-level data regarding incidences of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are lacking. This study evaluated the frequencies of irAEs among patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immune checkpoint inhibitors.Patients and MethodsAdministrative claims data from a large United States commercial insurance database (OptumLabs Data Warehouse) were used to retrospectively identify patients with NSCLC between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017 who received a programmed death-ligand 1/programmed cell death protein-1 (PD(L)-1) inhibitor. Cumulative risks for irAEs were estimated at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after initiation of a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. Additionally, associations between patient characteristics and frequency of irAEs were investigated utilizing multivariate logistic modeling.ResultsThe risk of developing any irAE was 52.5% (95% confidence interval, 49.9%-55.2%) after 12 months in 3164 patients with NSCLC who initiated a PD-(L)1 inhibitor (median age, 69.0 years; 1763 [55.7%] males; 1401 [44.3%] females). Cumulative risks of irAEs increased over time: pneumonitis was recorded in 2.5% of patients 1 month after initiation of treatment, and increased to 14.3% after 9 months. Risks of hypophysitis and pericarditis were 3.6% and 1.7% at 9 months, respectively. Patients who received PD-(L)1 inhibitors in the first line had lower frequencies of irAEs (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.87).ConclusionOur findings suggest that the frequencies of some irAEs may be higher than the rates reported in the pivotal trials that led to United States Food and Drug Administration approvals for PD-(L)1 inhibitors. These real-world data refine provider and patient expectations for outcomes in a broader population beyond what is observed in clinical trials.     

Mocetinostat in Combination With Durvalumab for Patients With Advanced NSCLC: Results From a Phase I/II Study

BackgroundHistone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have potential to augment the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors and overcome treatment resistance. This dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT02805660) investigated mocetinostat (class I/IV HDAC inhibitor) plus durvalumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across cohorts defined by tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and prior experience with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) or anti-PD-L1 regimens.Patients and MethodsSequential cohorts of patients with solid tumors received mocetinostat (starting dose: 50 mg TIW) plus durvalumab at a standard dose (1500 mg Q4W) to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D: phase I primary endpoint), based on the observed safety profile. RP2D was administered to patients with advanced NSCLC across 4 cohorts grouped by tumor PD-L1 expression (none or low/high) and prior experience with anti-PD-L1 /anti-PD-1 agents (naïve, clinical benefit: yes/no). The phase II primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1).ResultsEighty-three patients were enrolled (phase I [n = 20], phase II [n = 63]). RP2D was mocetinostat 70 mg TIW plus durvalumab. ORR was 11.5% across the phase II cohorts, and responses were durable (median 329 days). Clinical activity was observed in NSCLC patients with disease refractory to prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment: ORR 23.1%. Across all patients, fatigue (41%), nausea (40%), and diarrhea (31%) were the most frequent treatment-related adverse events.ConclusionMocetinostat 70 mg TIW plus durvalumab at the standard dose was generally well tolerated. Clinical activity was observed in patients with NSCLC unresponsive to prior anti-PD­(L)1 therapy.