Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve in the United States: a first comparative safety analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database

BackgroundThe single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) is a relatively new bariatric procedure. In 2020, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) started reporting outcomes for SADI-S.ObjectivesWe aimed to study the perioperative safety of SADI-S and compare it with other established bariatric procedures utilizing the MBSAQIP database.SettingAcademic hospital, United States.MethodsThe 2020 MBSAQIP Participant Use File was used to evaluate SADI-S outcomes. We included SADI-S primary cases and excluded revisions and concurrent operations. A 5:1 propensity matched analysis (PMA) for 20 variables was performed to compare the outcomes of the SADI-S with the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and a 2:1 PMA to the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).ResultsThere were 255 primary SADI-S reported in 2020. After PMA, the only significant complications between the RYGB and SADI-S cohorts were Clavien-Dindo grade IVa and IVb (.1% and 1.4% versus 1.6% and 7.1%, respectively). SADI-S had more Clavien-Dindo grade II, IVa, and IVb complications than the SG cohort (1.3% versus 3.5%, P = .03; .2% versus 1.6%, P = 0; 1.% versus 7.1%, P = 0). When compared with BPD/DS, outcomes including readmission, reoperation, and intervention were not statistically significant.ConclusionSADI-S, in its early adoption stage, has a higher incidence of perioperative complications than RYGB and SG. It has comparable 30-day outcomes to BPD/DS.     

One- versus two-stage conversions of adjustable gastric bands: an analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database

BackgroundLaparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are converted at high rates to secondary bariatric procedures. The available literature on the safety of converting in 1- versus 2-stage processes has not included large databases.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of a 1- versus 2-stage conversion of AGB.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), United States.MethodsThe MBSAQIP database for the years 2020 and 2021 was evaluated. One-stage AGB conversions were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and database variables. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine whether 1- or 2-stage conversions were associated with 30-day serious complications.ResultsThere were 12,085 patients who underwent conversion from previous AGB to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (63.0%) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (37.0%), of whom 41.0% underwent conversion in 1 stage and 59.0% in 2 stages. Patients who underwent 2-stage conversions had higher body mass indexes. Rates of serious complications were higher for patients undergoing RYGB compared with SG (5.2% versus 3.3%, P < .001) but were similar between 1-stage and 2-stage conversions in both cohorts. In both cohorts, there were similar rates of anastomotic leaks, postoperative bleeding, reoperation, and readmissions. Mortality was rare and similar between conversion groups.ConclusionsThere was no difference in outcomes or complications in 30 days between 1- and 2-stage conversions of AGB to RYGB or SG. Conversions to RYGB have higher complication and mortality rates than to SG, but there was no statistically significant difference between staged procedures. One- and 2-stage conversions from AGB are equivalent in safety.     

Perioperative and 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery in septuagenarians: implications for patient selection

BackgroundAlthough bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity, utilization of bariatric procedures in older adults remains low. Previous work reported higher morbidity in older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the generalizability of these data to contemporary septuagenarians is unclear.ObjectivesWe sought to evaluate differences in 30-day outcomes, 1-year weight loss, and co-morbidity remission after bariatric surgery among 3 age groups as follows: <45 years, 45–69 years, and ≥70 years.SettingStatewide quality improvement collaborative.MethodsUsing a large quality improvement collaborative, we identified patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between 2006 and 2018. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the association between age cohorts and 30-day outcomes, 1-year weight loss, and co-morbidity remission.ResultsWe identified 641 septuagenarians who underwent SG (68.5%) or RYGB (31.5%). Compared with 45–69 year olds, septuagenarians had higher rates of hemorrhage (5.1% versus 3.1%; P = .045) after RYGB and higher rates of leak/perforation (.9% versus .3%; P = .044) after SG. Compared with younger patients, septuagenarians lost less of their excess weight, losing 64.8% after RYGB and 53.8% after SG. Remission rates for diabetes and obstructive sleep were similar for patients aged ≥70 years and 45–69 years.ConclusionsBariatric surgery in septuagenarians results in substantial weight loss and co-morbidity remission with an acceptable safety profile. Surgeons with self-imposed age limits should consider broadening their selection criteria to include patients ≥70 years old.     

Early postoperative complications after gastric bypass revisional surgery in patients with previous sleeve gastrectomy versus primary gastric bypass

BackgroundRevisional bariatric surgery (RS) is indicated if there is weight regain or insufficient weight loss, no improvement or reappearance of co-morbidities, or previous bariatric surgery complications. It has been associated with higher postoperative morbidity.ObjectiveTo evaluate the early postoperative complications (<30 d) of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RS (RYGB-RS) after primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG-1) compared with primary RYGB (RYGB-1) at a bariatric surgery referral center.SettingDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery of General Universitary Hospital of Alicante, Spain.MethodsRetrospective cohort study comparing RYGB-RS after SG-1 and RYGB-1 between January 2008 and March 2021. Postoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, and readmissions were analyzed.ResultsSix hundred and twenty-eight RYGB surgeries (48 RYGB-RS, 580 RYGB-1) were studied. The mean age of patients undergoing RYGB-RS was 50 years, compared with 46 years in the RYGB-1 group (P = .017). Mean initial body mass index was 44.2 kg/m² (RYGB-RS) versus 47.6 kg/m² (RYGB-1; P = .004). Cardiovascular risk factors were higher in the RYGB-1 group (P < .05). Indications for RS were weight regain or insufficient weight loss (72.9%), weight regain or insufficient weight loss plus gastroesophageal reflux disease (14.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (12.5%). There were no differences in the frequency of complications (RYGB-RS 22.9% vs RYGB-1 20.5%) or in their severity (Clavien–Dindo ≥IIIa; RYGB-RS 10.4% vs RYGB-1 6.4%; P > .05). There were no differences in emergency room visits (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 14.9%) or in readmissions (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 9.4%).ConclusionNo differences were observed between primary RYGB and revisional RYGB in early morbidity, mortality, emergencies, or readmissions. Revisional bariatric surgery is a safe procedure at referral centers and must be done by expert hands.     

Comparison of weight loss outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in a racially mixed urban patient population

BackgroundNational data show a trend favoring laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) over Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Published data demonstrating the differences in weight loss between the two procedures are mixed.ObjectiveIn this retrospective study using clinical data from 2010 to 2020, we compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients undergoing either SG or RYGB to evaluate their long-term weight loss outcomes.SettingUniversity hospital in the United States.MethodsA total of 3329 patients were identified in our institutional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement database using Current Procedural Terminology codes for either RYGB or SG. A general linear model was used for baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was used for factors favoring RYGB versus SG. A multivariable linear mixed model was used for weight-trajectory analysis. Cox regression was used for a cumulative hazard ratio of 10% weight regained from nadir.ResultsFactors favoring RYGB were diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease, Hispanic ethnicity, and surgeon’s preference. SG was favored among Black patients and smokers. RYGB was associated with more weight loss at all time points. The risk of weight regain was significantly higher after SG versus RYGB.ConclusionsThe bariatric procedure choice is significantly influenced by race, medical history, and surgeon’s experience. RYGB results in a significantly more durable weight loss compared with SG regardless of race or other stratification factors.     

Ambulatory bariatric surgery: does it really lead to higher rates of adverse events?

BackgroundCorrelating patient outcomes with length of stay (LoS) is an important consideration in metabolic and bariatric surgery. At present, conflicting data exists regarding patient safety for ambulatory (AMB) metabolic and bariatric surgery.ObjectiveOutcomes for AMB–metabolic and bariatric surgery patients (LoS <1 d) undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were compared with matched patients with LoS ≥1 day (non-AMB) using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) registry.SettingMBSAQIP national database.MethodsThe MBSAQIP registry was queried for patients undergoing SG or RYGB (2015–2017) and patients grouped as AMB/non-AMB. Exclusion criteria included LoS >4 days, age <18 or >75 years, revision surgery, gastric banding, body mass index <35 kg/m², and day of surgery mortality. Variables were combined into major/minor complications and 30-day mortality. Analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and propensity matching.ResultsAfter exclusions were applied 408,895 patients remained (9973 AMB). Overall, 111,279 patients underwent RYGB (1032 AMB) and 297,616 underwent SG (8941 AMB), with similar demographic characteristics and co-morbidities between groups. For AMB patients, there was no increase in 30-day mortality, reoperation, or readmission, and fewer drains were placed versus matched non-AMB patients. In AMB-SG patients more surgical site infections were reported versus non–AMB-SG, although AMB-SG patients had fewer intensive care unit admissions. For AMB-RYGB, no differences in complications were detected versus non–AMB-RYGB.ConclusionBased on our analysis of the MBSAQIP database, patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB or SG procedures can be safely discharged on the day of their procedure without increased incidence of mortality, reoperation, or readmission.     

Duodenal switch in revisional bariatric surgery: conclusions from an expert consensus panel

BackgroundDuodenal switch (BPD/DS) is gaining popularity as a secondary procedure for inadequate weight loss after an initial operation.ObjectivesWe aimed to generate expert consensus points on the appropriate use of BPD/DS in the revisional bariatric surgical setting.SettingData were gathered at an international conference with attendees from a variety of different institutions and settings.MethodsSixteen lines of questioning regarding revisional BPD/DS were presented to an expert panel of 29 bariatric surgeons. Current available literature was reviewed extensively for each topic and proposed to the panel before polling. Responses were collected and topics defined as achieving consensus (≥70% agreement) or no consensus (<70% agreement).ResultsConsensus was present in 10 of 16 lines of questioning, with several key points most prominent.ConclusionsAs a second-stage procedure, BPD/DS is most appropriate after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for the treatment of super morbid obesity (96.7% agree) or as a subsequent operation for a reliable patient with insufficient weight loss after SG (88.5%). In a patient with weight regain and reflux and/or enlarged fundus after SG, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is preferable and BPD/DS should be avoided (90%). BPD/DS should not be used prophylactically in patients with a history of jejunoileal bypass who are otherwise doing well (80.8%). Applicability of BPD/DS is limited by technical difficulty; 86.2% of experts would routinely recommend or consider the procedure if it were more technically feasible after failed bypass. No consensus was found on approaches to revision of BPD/DS for protein malnutrition.     

Racial disparity in causes for readmission following bariatric surgery

BackgroundReadmission after bariatric surgery is not cost-effective and is a preventable quality metric within standardized practices. However, reasons for readmission among racial/ethnic bariatric cohorts are less explored and understood.ObjectiveOur study objective was designed to compare reasons for readmission among racial/ethnic cohorts of bariatric patients.SettingAcademic hospital.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the 2015–2018 MBSAQIP databases to identify Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) cases. Regression analyses determined predictors of all-cause and bariatric-related readmissions. Reasons for readmission were compared between racial/ethnic cohorts using propensity score matching.ResultsMore than 550 000 RYGB and SG cases were analyzed. The readmission rate was 3%–4%. Black race, RYGB, robot-assisted approach, and numerous co-morbidities were independently associated with readmission (P <.05). In RYGB cases, black (versus white) patients were at decreased odds of leak-related (P < .001) and cardiovascular-related (P < .001) readmissions but at increased odds of readmissions related to renal complications (P < .001). Hispanic (versus white) patients had a higher likelihood of venous thromboembolism–related readmissions (P < .001). In SG cases, black (versus white) patients had a similar lower likelihood of readmission related to leaks or cardiovascular complications but higher odds of readmission related to renal complications (P < .001). Hispanic (versus black) patients had a higher likelihood of leak-related readmissions (P < .001).ConclusionReadmission reasons after bariatric surgery vary by race/ethnicity. Perioperative pathways to mitigate complications, including readmissions, should consider these disparate findings.     

Postoperative sepsis after primary bariatric surgery: an analysis of MBSAQIP

BackgroundIdentifying patients at higher risk of postoperative sepsis (PS) may help to prevent this life-threatening complication.ObjectivesThis study aimed to identify the rate and predictors of PS after primary bariatric surgery.SettingAn analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) 2015-2017.MethodsPatients undergoing elective sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Exclusion criteria were revisional, endoscopic, and uncommon, or investigational procedures. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of organ/space surgical site infection (OS-SSI), and patients who developed sepsis were compared with patients who did not develop sepsis in each cohort. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PS.ResultsIn total, 438,752 patients were included (79.4% female, mean age 44.6±12 years). Of those, 661 patients (.2%) developed PS of which 245 (37.1%) developed septic shock. Out of 892 patients with organ/space surgical site infections (OS-SSI), 298 (45.1%) developed sepsis (P <.001). Patients who developed PS had higher mortality (8.8% versus .1%, P < .001), and this was highest in patients without OS-SSI (11.8% versus 5%, P = .002). The main infectious complications associated with PS in patients without OS-SSI were pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Independent predictors of PS in OS-SSI included RYGB versus SG (OR, 1.8), and age ≥50 years (OR, 1.4). Independent predictors of PS in patients without OS-SSI were conversion to other approaches (OR, 6), operation length >2 hours (OR, 5.7), preoperative dialysis (OR, 4.1), preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (OR, 2.8), limited ambulation most or all of the time (OR, 2.4), preoperative venous stasis (OR, 2.4), previous nonbariatric foregut surgery (OR, 2), RYGB versus SG (OR, 2), hypertension on medication (OR, 1.5), body mass index ≥50 kg/m²(OR, 1.4), age ≥50 years (OR, 1.3), obstructive sleep apnea (OR, 1.3).ConclusionDevelopment of OS-SSI after primary bariatric surgery is associated with sepsis and increased 30-day mortality. Patients without OS-SSI who develop PS have a significantly higher mortality rate compared with patients with OS-SSI who develop PS. Early identification and intervention in patients with PS, including those without OS-SSI, may improve survival in this high-risk group.     

Revisional bariatric surgery is more effective for improving obesity-related co-morbidities than it is for reinducing major weight loss

BackgroundPatients having previous bariatric surgery are at risk for weight regain and return of co-morbidities. If an anatomic basis for the failure is identified, many surgeons advocate revision or conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The aim of this study was to determine whether revisional bariatric surgery leads to sufficient weight loss and co-morbidity remission.Patients and MethodsFrom 2005-2012, patients undergoing revision were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative outcomes, including complications, weight loss, and co-morbidity remission, were examined for all patients with a history of a previous vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).ResultsTwenty-two patients with a history of RYGB and 56 with a history of VBG were identified. Following the revisional procedure, the RYGB group experienced 35.8% excess weight loss (%EWL) and a 31.8% morbidity rate. For the VBG group, patients experienced a 46.2% %EWL from their weight before the revisional operation with a 51.8% morbidity rate. Co-morbidity remission rate was excellent. Diabetes (VBG:100%, RYGB: 85.7%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (VBG: 94.4%, RYGB: 80%), and hypertension (VBG: 74.2%, RYGB:60%) demonstrated significant improvement.ConclusionRevision of a failed RYGB or conversion of a VBG to a RYGB provides less weight loss and a higher complication rate than primary RYGB but provides an excellent opportunity for co-morbidity remission.     

The impact of severe postoperative complications on outcomes of bariatric surgery—multicenter case-matched study

BackgroundBariatric surgery has relatively low complication rates, especially severe postoperative complications (defined by Clavien–Dindo classification as types 3 and 4), but these rates cannot be ignored. In other than bariatric surgical disciplines, complications affect not only short-term but also long-term results. In the field of bariatric surgery, this topic has not been extensively studied.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to assess the outcomes of bariatric treatment in patients with obesity and severe postoperative complications in comparison to patients with a noneventful perioperative course.SettingSix surgical units at Polish public hospitals.MethodsWe performed a multicenter propensity score matched analysis of 206 patients from 6 Polish surgical units and assessed the outcomes of bariatric procedures. A total of 103 patients with severe postoperative complications (70 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [SG] and 33 with laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass [RYGB]) were compared to 103 patients with no severe complications in terms of peri- and postoperative outcomes.ResultsThe outcomes of bariatric treatment did not differ between compared groups. Median percentage of total weight loss 12 months after the surgery was 28.8% in the group with complications and 27.9% in patients with no severe complications (P = 0.993). Remission rates of both type 2 diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension showed no significant difference between SG and RYGB (36% versus 42%, P = 0.927, and 41% versus 46%, P = 0.575. respectively).ConclusionsThe study suggests that severe postoperative complications had no significant influence either on weight loss effects or obesity-related diseases remission.     

Cross-sectional long-term micronutrient deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A pilot study

BackgroundNutritional deficiencies are highly prevalent in obese patients. Bariatric surgery has been associated with adverse effects on homeostasis of significant vitamins and micronutrients, mainly after gastric bypass. The aim of the present study was to compare the extent of long-term postsurgical nutritional deficiencies between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).MethodsThis cross-sectional, pilot study included 95 patients who underwent RYGB or SG surgery with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical parameters were compared according to the type of surgery.ResultsBoth types of surgery were associated with significant nutritional deficiencies. Vitamin B12 deficiency was significantly higher in patients with RYGB compared with SG (42.1% versus 5%, P = .003). The type of surgery was associated neither with anemia nor with iron or folate deficiency (SG versus RYGB: anemia, 54.2% versus 64.3%, P = .418; folate deficiency, 20% versus 18.4%, P = .884; iron deficiency, 30% versus 36.4%, P = .635).ConclusionDuring a mean follow up period of 4 years postRYGB or SG, patients were identified with several micronutrient deficiencies, including vitamin D, folate, and vitamin B12. SG may have a more favorable effect on the metabolism of vitamin B12 compared with RYGB, being associated with less malabsorption. Adherence to supplemental iron and vitamin intake is of primary significance in all cases of bariatric surgery.     

Duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a perioperative risk comparative analysis of the MBSAQIP Database (2015–2019)

BackgroundBiliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) is a procedure that has long been considered to have a higher early postoperative morbidity than Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, patients who undergo BPD/DS have more baseline co-morbidities that may affect the reported early postoperative morbidity.ObjectiveTo compare 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality between BPD/DS and RYGB propensity score–matched cohorts obtained from the MBSAQIP database.SettingAnalysis of data obtained from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 21-variable propensity score–matched patients in the BPD/DS and RYGB groups obtained from the MBSAQIP database between 2015 and 2019. Variables included age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and pertinent medical co-morbidities. Data were analyzed for 30-day postoperative morbidity, mortality, reoperation, reintervention, and readmissions.ResultsBefore matching, RYGB and BPD/DS cohorts contained 134 188 and 5079 patients, respectively. After multivariable propensity score matching, each cohort contained 5050 patients. The RYGB group had a higher rate of surgical-site infections than the BPD/DS group (1% versus .5%, P = .007) and a higher rate of blood product transfusions (1.1% versus .6%, P = .018). The rate of other early postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups (P > .05). There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality, readmission rate, reoperation rate, or reintervention rate between the 2 groups (P > .05).ConclusionWhen matched for baseline body mass index and co-morbidities, BPD/DS does not lead to a higher 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality than RYGB. Patients can be counseled that in the short term, BPD/DS is as safe as RYGB.     

Prevalence and impact of acid-related symptoms and diarrhea in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,sleeve gastrectomy,and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch

BackgroundGastrointestinal symptoms are common in the obese population.ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence and importance of acid-related symptoms and diarrhea in 3 different types of bariatric operations: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).SettingNational data from Sweden.MethodsA total of 58,823 primary bariatric procedures (RYGB: 87.5%, SG: 11.7%, and BPD/DS: .7%) performed from 2007 to 2017 were identified in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Associations between acid-related symptoms and diarrhea, both defined by continuous use of pharmacologic treatment, and predefined outcomes were studied in a multivariate model, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and year of surgery.ResultsAt baseline, acid-related symptoms were most common in RYGB (9.9%), while diarrhea was rare. In general, symptomatic patients were older, had more co-morbidities, and scored lower on quality of life compared with the remaining patients. In the multivariate analysis, RYGB patients with acid-related symptoms had reduced risk of prolonged operative time and length of stay, while postoperative complications and reoperations increased by 24% and 36%, respectively. In SG, both symptoms were associated with prolonged operative time and a doubled risk for complications. Symptomatic patients had reduced improvement in quality of life, while no association with the weight result was seen. Postoperatively, acid-related symptoms decreased in RYGB, while doubling in SG. Diarrhea increased 2- and 6-fold in RYGB and BPD/DS, respectively.ConclusionThe 2 gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with increased operative risks and reduced improvement in quality of life. Postoperatively, the respective anatomic alternations affected both gastrointestinal symptoms.     

Exocrine pancreatic function and dynamic of digestion after restrictive and malabsorptive bariatric surgery: a prospective,cross-sectional,and comparative study

BackgroundGastrointestinal anatomical changes after restrictive and malabsorptive bariatric surgery lead to important disturbances in the process of digestion and absorption of nutrients and could lead to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI).ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate and to compare pancreatic function and the dynamic of digestion and absorption of nutrients after restrictive and malabsorptive bariatric surgical procedures.SettingUniversity Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.MethodsA prospective, observational, cross-sectional, comparative study of patients after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) was carried out. Patients with obesity who did not undergo surgery were included as control group. Pancreatic function and the dynamic of digestion and absorption of nutrients were evaluated by the ¹³C-mixed triglyceride (¹³C-MTG) breath test. Six-hour ¹³C-cumulative recovery rate (¹³C-CRR), ¹³C exhalation peak, and 1-hour maximal ¹³C-CRR were calculated.ResultsOne-hundred five patients were included (mean age, 49.8 yr; 84 women). Six-hour ¹³C-CRR was significantly reduced after BPD/DS (P < .001) but not after SG and RYGB. EPI was present in 75% of patients after BPD/DS, 8.3% of patients after RYGB, and 4.3% of patients after SG. Compared with the control group who did not undergo surgery, digestion and absorption of nutrients tended to occur earlier after SG, whereas it was delayed after RYGB and mainly after BPD/DS (P < .001).ConclusionBariatric surgery significantly alters the dynamic of the digestive process. EPI is very common after BPD/DS, frequent after RYGB, and less frequent after SG. This information is clinically relevant since EPI is a treatable condition associated with symptoms, nutritional deficiencies, and complications.     

Early morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the elderly: a NSQIP analysis

BackgroundEven though the U.S. population is aging, outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly are not well defined. Current literature mostly evaluates the effects of gastric bypass (RYGB), with paucity of data on sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with laparoscopic SG in patients aged 65 years and over, in comparison to RYGB.MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients aged 65 and over who underwent laparoscopic RYGB and SG between 2010 and 2011. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. P value<.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported when applicable.ResultsWe identified 1005 patients. Mean body mass index was 44±7. SG was performed in 155 patients (15.4%). The American Society of Anesthesiology physical classification of 3 or 4 was similar between the 2 groups (82.6% versus 86.7%, P = .173). Diabetes was more frequent in the RYGB group (43.2% versus 55.6%, P = .004). 30-day mortality (0.6% versus 0.6%, OR 1.1, 95% CI .11–9.49), serious morbidity (5.2% versus 5.6%, OR .91, 95% CI .42–0.96), and overall morbidity (9% versus 9.1%, OR 1.0, 95% CI .55–1.81) were similar.ConclusionIn elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, SG is not associated with significantly different 30-day outcomes compared to RYGB. Both procedures are followed by acceptably low morbidity and mortality.     

Hypoalbuminemia as a risk factor for complications in revisional/conversional bariatric surgery: an MBSAQIP analysis

BackgroundHypoalbuminemia (HA) is a risk factor for serious complications after elective bariatric surgery. Patients undergoing revisional/conversional bariatric surgery may represent a higher-risk group who often have underlying co-morbid medical illnesses and more complex surgery.ObjectivesThis study investigated the postoperative complications in patients with HA undergoing revisional/conversional bariatric surgery.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), years 2015–2019.MethodsThe MBSAQIP database was used to evaluate patients undergoing non-banding revisional/conversional bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2019. Patients were categorized by serum albumin (≤3.5 g/dL). Variables were assessed via bivariate analysis and multivariable regression. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare gastric bypass (RYGB) to sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).ResultsOne hundred forty-seven thousand four hundred thirty patients underwent revisional/conversional procedures. After applied exclusions, 58,777 patients were available for analysis. The HA group had a significantly (P < .05) higher prevalence of being black (22.95% versus 17.76%), renal insufficiency (1.08% versus .36%), smoking history (9.47% versus 6.91%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (2.54% versus 1.33%), and history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (4.03% versus 2.3%). Postoperative complications associated with HA included perioperative blood transfusion (3.1% versus 1.27%; P < .001), 30day readmission (10.87 versus 6.77%; P < .001), 30day reoperation (4.9% versus 3.18%; P < .001), and 30day mortality (.40% versus .14%; P < .0001). HA was a significant predictor of 30day readmission in the RYGB versus VSG matched cohort (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.14, 1.48]; P < .001).ConclusionsHA is a risk factor requiring attention for patients undergoing revisional/conversional bariatric surgery and optimization of nutritional status or medical comorbidities associated with HA prior to bariatric surgery may help avoid postoperative complications.     

Weight loss and effect on co-morbidities in the long-term after duodenal switch and gastric bypass: a population-based cohort study

BackgroundUnsatisfactory weight loss is common after bariatric surgery in patients with super obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥50 kg/m²). Unfortunately, this group of patients is increasing worldwide.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare long-term weight loss and effect on co-morbidities after duodenal switch (DS) and gastric bypass (RYGB) in super-obese patients.SettingUniversity hospital, Sweden, national cohort.MethodsThis observational population-based cohort-study of primary DS and RYGB (BMI ≥48 kg/m²) in Sweden from 2007 to 2017 used data from 4 national registers. Baseline characteristics were used for propensity score matching (1 DS:4 RYGB). Weight loss was analyzed up until 5 years after surgery. Medication for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, depression, and pain were analyzed up until 10 years after surgery.ResultsThe study population consisted of 333 DS and 1332 RYGB, with 60.7% females averaging 38.5 years old and BMI 55.0 kg/m² at baseline. DS resulted in a lower BMI at 5 years compared with RYGB, 32.2 ± 5.5 and 37.8 ± 7.3, respectively, (P < .01). DS reduced prevalence of diabetes and hypertension more than RYGB, while reduction in dyslipidemia was similar for both groups, during the 10-year follow-up. Both groups increased their use of antidepressants and a maintained a high use of opioids.ConclusionThis study indicates that super-obese patients have more favorable outcomes regarding weight loss and effect on diabetes and hypertension, after DS compared with RYGB.     

Diagnoses related to abuse of alcohol and addictive substances after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a nation-wide registry study from Norway

BackgroundAfter Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients are at higher risk of alcohol problems. In recent years, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a common procedure, but the incidence rates (IRs) of alcohol abuse after SG are unexplored.ObjectivesTo compare IRs of diagnoses indicating problems with alcohol or other substances between patients having undergone SG or RYGB with a minimum of 6-month follow-up.SettingAll government funded hospitals in Norway providing bariatric surgery.MethodsA retrospective population-based cohort study based on data from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The outcomes were ICD-10 of Diseases and Related Health Problems diagnoses relating to alcohol (F10) and other substances (F11–F19).ResultsThe registry provided data on 10,208 patients who underwent either RYGB or SG during the years 2008 to 2014 with a total postoperative observation time of 33,352 person-years. This corresponds to 8196 patients with RYGB (27,846 person-yr, average 3.4 yr) and 2012 patients with SG (5506 person-yr; average 2.7 yr). The IR for the diagnoses related to alcohol problems after RYGB was 6.36 (95% confidence interval: 5.45–7.36) per 1000 person-years and 4.54 (2.94–6.70) after SG. When controlling for age and sex, adjusted hazard ratio was .75 (.49–1.14) for SG compared with RYGB. When combining both bariatric procedures, women <26 years were more likely to have alcohol-related diagnoses (3.2%, 2.1–4.4) than women of 26 to 40 years (1.6%, 1.1–2.1) or women >40 (1.3%, .9–1.7). The IR after RYGB for the diagnoses related to problems with substances other than alcohol was 3.48 (95% confidence interval: 2.82–4.25) compared with 3.27 (1.94–5.17) per 1000 person-years after SG. Controlling for age and sex, the hazard ratio was .99 (.60–1.64) for SG compared with RYGB.ConclusionsIn our study, procedure-specific differences were not found in the risks (RYGB versus SG) for postoperative diagnoses related to problems with alcohol and other substances within the available observation time. A longer observation period seems required to explore these findings further.     

Racial disparities in bariatric perioperative outcomes among the elderly

BackgroundBariatric surgery outcomes in elderly patients have been shown to be safe, but with a higher rate of adverse outcomes compared with nonelderly patients. The impact of race on bariatric surgery outcomes continues to be explored, with recent studies showing higher rates of adverse outcomes in black patients. Perioperative outcomes in racial cohorts of elderly bariatric patients are largely unexplored.ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to compare outcomes between elderly non-Hispanic black (NHB) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) bariatric surgery patients to determine whether outcomes are mediated by race.SettingAcademic hospital.MethodsPatients who had a primary Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in the period 2015–2018 and were at least 65 years of age were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File (MBSAQIP PUF). Selected cases were stratified by race. Outcomes were compared between matched racial cohorts. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine whether race independently predicted morbidity.ResultsFrom 2015 to 2018, 29,394 elderly NHW (90.8%) and NHB (9.2%) patients underwent an RYGB or SG. At baseline, NHB elderly patients had a higher burden of co-morbid conditions, resulting in higher rates of overall (7.7% versus 6.4%, P = .009) and bariatric-related (5.4% versus 4.1%, P = .001) morbidity. All outcome measures were similar between propensity-score-matched racial elderly bariatric patient cohorts. On regression analysis, NHB race remained independently correlated with morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.08–1.47, P = .003).ConclusionRYGB and SG are safe in elderly patient cohorts, with no differences in adverse outcomes between NHB and NHW patients, accounting for confounding factors. While race does not appear to impact outcomes in the elderly cohorts, NHB race may play a role in access.