Endocrinology: Human chorionic gonadotrophin is a better luteal support than progesterone in ultrashort gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist/menotrophin in-vitro fertilization cycles

In an attempt to determine the best luteal support in in-vitrofertilization (IVF) cycles treated with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)by the ultrashort protocol, 60 patients were prospectively randomizedfor either i.m. progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) luteal support. The two groups did not differ in the meannumber of oocytes retrieved and embryos replaced, nor in themean age of the patients and the amount of HMG used. HCG maintainedhigher levels of oestradiol and progesterone during the lutealphase. Conception rate was significantly higher in the HCG group.We conclude that HCG is superior to i.m. progesterone as lutealsupport in IVF cycles in which GnRHa is used in the ultrashortprotocol.     

Analysis of the bleeding pattern in assisted reproduction cycles with luteal phase supplementation using vaginal micronized progesterone

This study was designed to determine the effects of a vaginal micronized progesterone preparation on bleeding patterns and pregnancy outcomes after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). The study population consisted of 149 consecutive women who had undergone IVF-ICSI using 'long-protocol' stimulation with buserelin-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). A retrospective chart analysis of computerized medical records was undertaken. Vaginal progesterone (200 mg three times daily) was begun the day before oocyte retrieval and continued for a minimum of 16-19 days following human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Occurrence of bleeding following HCG injection, pregnancy rate and outcomes, and serum concentrations of oestradiol were measured. Women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer with ICSI and using vaginal progesterone for luteal support had normal luteal phase lengths (day of HCG minus day of onset of bleeding). In the absence of pregnancy, bleeding occurred after 19.2 +/- 3.9 days (mean +/- SD). Out of the pregnant group only three women bled within 19 days of HCG administration: two had biochemical pregnancies which spontaneously vanished and one evolved to term. The results reflect the normal bleeding pattern to be expected when vaginal progesterone is used for luteal support in IVF and embryo transfer, an approach whose efficacy has been amply proven. No shortened luteal phases were observed using vaginally administered progesterone.     

A prospective randomized study on oestradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation

A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate theuse of adding oestradiol valerate 6 mg per os daily to intravaginalmicronized progesterone (600 mg daily) as luteal supplements.The study comprised 378 infertile women superovulated with agonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausalgonadotrophins (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or zygoteintra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). The clinical pregnancy ratewas similar (29%) whether or not oestradiol valerate was addedto intravaginal progesterone. Eighteen out of twenty-two endometrialbiopsies were in phase, and morphological evaluations of thetwo luteal supplementation groups were not different. Serumhormone profiles in singleton pregnancies showed a similar dayof appearance of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) in bothprotocols but significantly lower oestradiol concentrationsarose in the group without oestradiol valerate. In 32% of thesingleton pregnancies, the first appearance of HCG occurredlater than day 12 after HCG injection; in those ongoing pregnancies,corpus luteum rescue—as measured by significantly lowerserum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations—was compromised.This study provided no evidence of any benefit of routinelysupplementing GnRHa/HMG cycles with oestradiol valerate in additionto intravaginal micronized progesterone.     

Differential effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists administered as desensitizing or flare protocols on hormonal function in the luteal phase of hyperstimulated cycles

The incorporation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) stimulation protocols has led to doubt about the quality of the subsequent luteal phase. The effects of two GnRHa stimulation protocols on luteal phase concentrations of oestradiol (E2), progesterone (P), luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were compared with the standard clomiphene stimulation regimen. Subjects receiving clomiphene with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG, n = 377) showed essentially similar luteal phase P concentrations to those receiving leuprolide acetate/HMG as a desensitization protocol. Subjects receiving concomitant leuprolide and HMG from day 2 to utilize the flare effect of the GnRHa exhibited significantly lower P levels in the luteal phase compared to clomiphene/HMG and leuprolide desensitization protocols despite the addition of HCG support. This occurred despite equivalent E2 concentrations at the time of ovulation and identical numbers of oocytes recovered. LH concentrations in non-conception cycles were suppressed for at least 14 days in the luteal phase in both GnRHa protocols compared to clomiphene stimulation. Differences were less obvious in cycles where conception occurred suggesting that implantation may proceed more favourably when the luteal endocrinology was optimal. It is concluded that flare methods of GnRHa hyperstimulation are associated with significantly different luteal phases compared with clomiphene or desensitization protocols. It is proposed that the use of the flare type of stimulation may significantly influence the response of the granulosa cells to LH or HCG via gonadotrophin receptors or through altered post-receptor function.     

Triggering of ovulation in human menopausal gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles: comparison between intravenously administered gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (100 and 500 {micro}g), GnRH agonist (buserelin, 500 {micro}g) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 000 IU)

We studied the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases in 38 humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-stimulated cycles, in which ovulationwas triggered with four different i.v. bolus ovulation triggers:100 µg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; group A,n = 9), 500 µg GnRH agonist (GnRHa; group B, n = 10),10 000IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; group C, n = 10)and 500 µg GnRH (group D, n = 9). Endogenous luteinizinghormone (LH) surges occurred in all cycles of groups A, B andD. The rise was slowest but highest in group B (P < 0.0001)and lowest in group A. Although the t₀ serum oestradiol valueswere similar in all groups, day +8 oestradiol and day +4 and+8 progesterone concentrations were higher in group C (P <0.05). At day +4 and +8, serum LH concentrations were lowest(P < 0.01) but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrationswere higher. Clinically, day +8 luteal scores showed a moreconspicuous degree of ovarian hyperstimulation in the HCG group(P = 0.0292). Luteal insufficiency, defined as cycles with progesteroneconcentrations of <8 ng/ml, occurred much more frequentlyin groups A, B and D than in group C (day +4: P < 0.0003;day +8: P < 0.0001), despite progesterone supplementation.Three pregnancies (one in group C and two in group D) and onemoderate case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (ina non-conceptional group D cycle) occurred. These findings showthat (i) ovulation occurs and pregnancy can be achieved followingan endogenous LH surge induced by GnRH and its agonists, (ii)a high frequency of luteal insufficiency occurs in such cycleseven with luteal supplementation and (iii) OHSS cannot be totallyprevented by this approach, although cycles with an endogenousLH surge in general result in fewer subclinical signs of ovarianhyperstimulation.     

Endocrinology: Comparison of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and human chorionic gonadotrophin for the induction of ovulation and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a case-control study

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) has been suggestedas an alternative to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) fortriggering ovulation, while preventing ovarian hyperstimulationsyndrome (OHSS). Since a prospective, controlled study wouldbe unethical at this point, we used a retrospective, case-selfcontrol approach to compare GnRHa with HCG in that context.A group of 16 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients who hadsevere OHSS in previous cycles, in which HCG was given to triggerovulation, were studied in subsequent cycles in which GnRHawas used. Each GnRHa cycle (case) was compared to a previousHCG cycle that resulted in OHSS (self control). None of thesesubsequent cydes resulted in severe OHSS. The use of GnRHa didnot affect the number of oocytes retrieved or their quality.Serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of ovulation triggeringwere signilicantly (P<0.01) higher in the GnRHa cycles comparedto HCG cycles. Exogenous progesterone and oestra diol were effectivein maintaining relatively constant serum oestradiol and progesteroneserum concentrations during the luteal phase. Pregnancy rateper cycle was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, theuse of GnRHa to induce ovulation in IVF patients, who are athigh risk for developing OHSS, effectively eliminates this riskwithout affecting other parameters of the stimulation cycle.     

A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement.

A luteal phase defect has been demonstrated in cycles stimulated using a protocol including a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). We have conducted a randomized prospective study of luteal and early pregnancy supplementation in 262 women selected for in-vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). Either intramuscular progesterone in oil (50 mg/day) or intravaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/day) was used as luteal supplement. In association with oestradiol valerate, progesterone administration was initiated from the day before oocyte retrieval until the 12th week of pregnancy. The implantation rate just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) in favour of the group receiving intravaginal progesterone. In the latter group, we observed a higher clinical pregnancy rate (33.6 versus 26.7%, not significant). Despite lower plasma progesterone levels, a lower first trimester abortion rate (P less than 0.05) was found in the intravaginally treated group. Intravaginal micronized progesterone was well tolerated by all patients and appeared more effective than intramuscular progesterone in improving the implantation rate, and in decreasing the incidence of abortions in stimulated cycles including GnRHa.     

Endocrinology: A randomized prospective study of gonadotrophin with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for treatment of unexplained infertility

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) incombination with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovulationinduction has been advocated for the treatment, particularlyby in-vitro fertilization (IVF) of various types of infertility.The present study was designed to compare the clinical efficacyof HMG alone with a short protocol of GnRHa/HMG for treatmentof unexplained infertility. A total of 91 couples with unexplainedinfertility were randomly assigned to one of two treatments;either HMG with intra-uterine insemination (IUI) (45 patients,62 cycles) or GnRHa/HMG with IUI (46 patients, 69 cycles) treatments.Progesterone concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) administration were significantly higher in HMG (1.5 ±0.9 ng/ml) versus GnRHa/HMG (0.8 ± 0.6 ng/ml; P <0.05)cycles. Furthermore, GnRHa suppressed the occurrences ofpremature luteinization (GnRHa/HMG 5.8% and HMG 24.2% respectively).However, there were no significant differences in HMG dose requirements,plasma oestradiol concentrations or follicular development onthe day of HCG administration between the two groups. Nor wereany significant differences found in the pregnancy rates betweenthe two treatment protocols (GnRHa/HMG 13.0% and HMG 11.3% respectively).Our results suggest no beneficial effect of GnRHa/HMG comparedto HMG alone for the treatment of unexplained infertility, basedon pregnancy rates.     

Adjuvant growth hormone therapy in poor responders to in-vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of growthhormone (GH) supplementation to a combined gonado-trophin-releasinghormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotrophin (GnRHa/HMG) treatmentprotocol on ovarian response in ‘poor responders’undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). GH or a placebo wereadministered in a prospective randomized double-blind manner.A total of 14 poor-responder patients (oestradiol < 500 pg/ml,less than three oocytes retrieved in two previous IVF cycles)were randomly allocated to a combined treatment of either GnRHa/HMG/GH (18 IU on alternate days, total dose 72 IU) or GnRHa/ HMGplacebo. No difference was found between the study and controlgroups in the number of HMG ampoules used, the number of follicles(>14 mm) and serum oestradiol concentrations on the day ofadministration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the numberof oocytes retrieved and fertilized, and the number of embryostransferred. The GH group (n = 7) did not show a better ovulatoryresponse in the study cycles; mean ± SD serum oestradiolon day of HCG 411 ± 124 versus 493 ± 291 pg/ml,aspirated oocytes 2.2 ± 1.5 versus 1.9 ± 2.0.Interestingly, when the above results for the placebo groupwere compared with their previous cycles (serum oestradiol 403± 231 pg/ml; 0.4 ± 0.5 aspirated oocytes), a non-specificeffect was found. Follicular recruitment, oestradiol secretionby mature follicles and the number of oocytes retrieved in poorresponders were not improved by GH supplementation.     

Luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization using gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue before ovarian stimulation: a prospective randomized study of human chorionic gonadotrophin versus intramuscular progesterone.

This study was conducted to compare the endocrine milieu and pregnancy rates in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) programme employing a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) when either human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or progesterone were used for luteal phase support. A total of 121 IVF-ET treatment cycles were prospectively studied. All patients started leuprolide acetate in the midluteal phase and it was continued for at least 10 days. When oestradiol levels were less than 150 pmol/l, HMG was started. When at least three follicles were greater than or equal to 17 mm in diameter, HCG 5000 IU i.m. was given. Oocytes were retrieved using transvaginal ultrasound and embryos were transferred 48 h later. The patients' cycles were prospectively randomized to receive HCG (72 cycles) or progesterone (49 cycles) luteal support. The HCG group received 1500 IU i.m. on days 3, 6 and 9 after the initial trigger. The progesterone group received 12.5 mg i.m. q.d. starting from the day after the HCG trigger. The dose of progesterone was increased to 25 mg i.m. q.d. starting on the day of embryo transfer and continued for 17-21 days. If the patient became pregnant, this dose of progesterone was continued until fetal heart activity was visualized by ultrasound. Mean ages, number of eggs retrieved, embryos transferred, oestradiol levels on the day of the HCG trigger, oestradiol and progesterone at the time of embryo transfer were the same in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Follicular and luteal phase characteristics following early cessation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are widely used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for the prevention of a premature rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. However, the administration of GnRHa during the follicular phase may also impair subsequent luteal function due to retarded recovery of pituitary gonadotrophin secretion. Therefore, luteal supplementation is generally applied. The present study was designed to determine whether a premature LH surge would still be prevented after early cessation of GnRHa during ovarian stimulation and whether subsequent luteal phase LH production would be sufficient to support progesterone synthesis by the corpus luteum. Sixty patients were randomized for three groups: (i) A long GnRHa/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) protocol with luteal support by repeated human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (n = 20), (ii) early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa without luteal support (n = 20), and (iii) a long GnRHa protocol without luteal support (n = 20). Frequent ultrasound and blood sampling was performed during the entire IVF cycle. Forty normo-ovulatory women served as controls. No premature LH surges were found after early cessation of GnRHa. In this group, some pituitary recovery occurred during the late luteal phase, but this did not affect corpus luteum function. Progesterone concentrations were shown to be dependent on disappearance of the pre-ovulatory bolus of HCG. Pregnancies occurred in all three groups. In conclusion, early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa is still effective in the prevention of a premature rise in LH. Although some pituitary recovery was observed thereafter, corpus luteum function is still abnormal due to early luteolysis.     

In-vitro fertilization and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Eight patients who developed severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were identified among 1302 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) over a 1 year period (prevalence of 0.6%); 63% had ultrasonically diagnosed polycystic ovaries (PCO) and 75% were undergoing their first attempt at IVF. Pretreatment with a superactive luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue significantly increased the prevalence of severe OHSS (1.1% versus 0.2%, P less than 0.05) compared with ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). The mean serum oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was 8200 +/- 2300 pmol/l. A mean of 19.6 +/- 6.8 follicles had been aspirated and 13.1 +/- 7.7 oocytes recovered at transvaginal ultrasound-directed oocyte recovery. All patients had an embryo transfer and luteal support in the form of HCG. The clinical pregnancy rate was 88%, multiple pregnancy rate 71% and implantation rate 63.5 +/- 41.3%. In a group of seven patients who were hospitalized for moderate OHSS during the same period, peak oestradiol levels were significantly lower than in those with severe OHSS (P less than 0.05). Of the group with moderate OHSS, 57% had PCO, the clinical pregnancy rate was 100% and multiple pregnancy rate 43%. Patients with ultrasound-diagnosed PCO have an increased risk of developing OHSS and the dose of HMG administered to them should be minimized. In patients at risk of developing OHSS, progesterone instead of HCG should be used for luteal support. Transfer of a maximum of two embryos or freezing all embryos for transfer in a subsequent cycle may reduce the likelihood of multiple pregnancy.     

Endocrinology: The effect of growth hormone on granulosa cell function during in-vitro fertilization

The effect of growth hormone addition to human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG), after pituitary down-regulation, on granulosa cell function,in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was evaluated. Growth hormoneor placebo were added in a prospective, randomized and double-blindmanner to an existing IVF stimulation protocol. Forty-two normalovulatory women (38 years old) with mechanical factor infertilityand normal male factor were included in the study. Gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) was given from day 21 of the previouscycle until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration.Follicular stimulation with HMG was started after pituitarydown-regulation. Growth hormone 12 IU/day or placebo were administeredon alternate days, beginning day 1 until day 7 of HMG treatment.Granulosa cell function was evaluated, in all patients, by follicularfluid levels of ovarian steroids and insulin-like growth factor-I(IGF-I). In 14 patients, chosen arbitrarily granulosa luteincells were cultured in the presence and absence of additionalHCG. Follicular fluid levels of oestradiol, progesterone, testosteroneand IGF-I were similar in both growth hormone and placebo groups.Basal and post-HCG levels of oestradiol and progesterone didnot differ significantly between the two groups of granulosalutein cell cultures. We conclude that after pituitary down-regulation,in-vivo administration of growth hormone with HMG in young ovulatorywomen does not seem to affect granulosa cell function when comparedto the administration of HMG alone.     

The effect of progesterone supplementation prior to the induction of ovulation in women treated for in-vitro fertilization

Thirty-one patients superovulated with clomiphene citrate (CC)and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) were given a singleinjection of 25 mg progesterone (P group) 6 h prior to injectionof human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Levels of urinary andplasma luteinizing hormone (LH) were significantly higher (P<0.001)immediately prior to HCG in the P group compared with thirty-onecontrol patients who had HCG on the same night. Plasma levelsof progesterone remained significantly elevated (P<0.02)for 80 h after injection in the P group, thereafter the levelwas similar to controls. The number of oocytes recovered, fertilizedand replaced per patient was identical in both groups. However,four control patients had no embryos replaced due to failedfertilization. It is concluded that (i) in the majority of Ppatients the timing of ovulation induction by HCG injectionwas appropriate as an LH surge was elicited thus reflectinga physiological stage of readiness, and (ii) elevated plasmaprogesterone levels around the time of oocyte recovery and inthe early luteal phase do not increase the likelihood of theestablishment of pregnancy in patients stimulated for in-vitrofertilization and embryo replacement (TVF/ER) with CC and HMG.     

The effect of human menopausal gonadotrophin and highly purified, urine-derived follicle stimulating hormone on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in down-regulated normogonadotrophic women

It has been suggested that the luteinizing hormone (LH) activityof human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) preparations used forovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) may haveadverse effects on reproductive outcome. In the present prospective,randomized trial of 218 infertile couples this notion was investigated.A total of 114 women were treated with Pergonal (HMG group)and 104 with Fertinorm HP (HP-FSH group). The two groups werecomparable with regard to duration of infertility, cause ofinfertility, age and number of previous IVF attempts and allhad normal basal gonadotrophin concentrations before treatmentwas started. A standard hormonal treatment consisting of pituitarydown-regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue(GnRHa) for 14 days starting on cycle day 21, followed by eitherHMG or highly purified follicle stimulating hormone (HP-FSH),three ampoules (225 IU) per day for 7 days, was used in allcases. The daily hormone dose was thereafter individualizedaccording to the ovarian response. A maximum of two pre-embryoswere transferred after 3 days of culture. Luteal support withprogesterone (300 mg per day intravaginally) was used in allcases. Serum concentrations of oestradiol, FSH and LH were measuredon days 1 and 8 of stimulation and on the day of oocyte retrieval.The mean number of days of stimulation, mean number of ampoulesof HMG or HP-FSH used, mean total motile sperm count on theday of oocyte retrieval and mean numbers of oocytes retrieved(13.4 versus 13.7) or pre-embryos transferred (1.8 versus 1.8)were similar for both groups. Significantly (P < 0.05) morecycles in the HP-FSH group (17 = 16%) were cancelled due tocomplete failure of fertilization than in the HMG group (7 =6%). The mean fertilization rate was significantly (P < 0.05)higher in the HMG group (56%) than in the HP-FSH group (50%),and significantly more transferable pre-embryos were obtainedin the HMG than in the HP-FSH group (mean: 4.0 versus 3.2; P< 0.01). Serum hormone concentrations were similar in thetwo groups on stimulation day 1, but differed significantlywith regard to FSH, LH and oestradiol on stimulation day 8.The clinical outcome was similar in the two groups, with anongoing pregnancy rate (>12 weeks of gestation) per startedcycle of 33% in the HMG group and 29% in the HP-FSH group. Theclinical abortion rates were similar(10 and 14%), and the implantationrate was 30% in each group. In conclusion, no detrimental effectof the LH activity of HMG on the clinical outcome of IVF inGnRHa down-regulated normogonadotrophic women was found. Tothe contrary, some beneficial effects of HMG on fertilizationrates and pre-embryo development as compared with HP-FSH weredemonstrated. These effects, as well as the differences in serumhormone concentrations during ovarian stimulation, may be causedby differences in LH content and/or in the composition of FSHisoforms of the HMG and HP-FSH preparations.     

The benefits of mid-luteal addition of human chorionic gonadotrophin in in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol and luteal support with progesterone

Luteal support is essential in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)when long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)is used. Because progesterone lacks luteotrophic stimulation,it seems to be the drug of choice in cases with an increasedrisk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The aim ofthis study was to assess the beneficial effect of the mid-lutealaddition of human choriomc gonadotrophin (HCG) in IVF, usinga down-regulation protocol and luteal support with progesterone,in a prospective randomized study. The study included 170 IVFcycles down-regulated with long-acting GnRHa which were supportedwith 50 mg/day progesterone i.m. during the luteal phase. Patientswere evaluated in the mid-luteal period. Those without clinicalsigns of OHSS, oestradiol concentrations <1000 pg/ml andprogesterone concentrations <50 mg/ml were randomly allocatedto either the addition of 2500 IU HCG (HCG+ group) or no HCG(HCG– group). End luteal phase progesterone concentrationsamong non-pregnant patients were used to assess the contributionof exogenous progesterone and to categorize pregnancies accordingto their corpus luteum function. Similar low OHSS (2.7 and 1.8%)and pregnancy (30 and 29%) rates were observed in the HCG+ andHCG– groups respectively. Of the 26 pregnancies in theHCG+ cases, there was only one case with reduced corpus luteumfunction, compared with 12 of the 25 pregnancies among HCG–patients. Cases with reduced corpus luteum function requiredcontinuous progesterone support and presented lower HCG concentrationsand a higher rate of adverse pregnancy outcome. We concludethat mid-luteal HCG addition does not affect pregnancy rate,but in fact helps to preserve corpus luteum function and avoidsthe need for further supplementation during early pregnancy.     

Effect of disruption versus continuation of gonadotrophin-releasing agonist after human chorionic gonadotrophin administration on corpus luteum function in patients undergoing ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization

Previous studies have described the luteolytic effect of gonadotrophin- releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administered in the early luteal phase. The present work was undertaken to compare in a prospective and randomized design the effect of disruption versus continuation of daily GnRHa after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration on corpus luteum function in patients undergoing ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Two different studies were designed and a total of 38 ovum donors, aged 23-30 years, were included. In the first study, the effect of GnRHa on the early luteal phase of IVF-stimulated cycles was investigated (n = 27); the patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they stopped (n = 13) or continued with daily GnRHa injections (n = 14) for an additional period of 15 days after HCG administration. Blood was drawn from luteal phase days 2 to 6 (day 0 = day of HCG administration) and oestradiol and progesterone concentrations were analysed. The second study focused on the effects of continuation versus disruption of GnRHa administration in the mid- late luteal phase. A similar design was employed including six patients who stopped GnRH on day 0 and five other women who continued GnRHa for 15 days after HCG administration. In this second study, blood was drawn from days 5 to 11 and oestradiol, progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were analysed. IVF parameters were similar in both groups. The results indicate that continuous GnRHa administration, after HCG injection, does not produce changes in oestradiol, progesterone and LH concentrations in the early, mid- and late luteal phases compared to those patients in whom GnRHa is discontinued at the day of HCG administration. The present work demonstrates that, when ovulation induction is performed, the corpus luteum is driven primarily by the HCG, regardless of the administration or disruption of GnRHa in the luteal phase. This suggests that the lack of differences between continuation versus disruption of GnRHa may be due to the accumulation of the product over the previous 2-3 weeks of treatment.      

The effect of luteal support with human chorionic gonadotrophin or progesterone on the daily progesterone profile after different types of ovarian stimulation.

Attempts have been made to increase the low pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles by luteal phase support with progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Previously, this practice has been inconsistent and the results unclear. The detailed effect of support on the progesterone profile in the luteal phase was assessed by daily salivary progesterone measurements in non-conception IVF cycles. The comparison of HCG and progesterone support in two different stimulation protocols showed that the profile of luteal progesterone concentrations was similar in control cycles and those supported with a vaginal progesterone suppository, showing an early decrease by the fourth luteal day. In cycles supported with multiple doses of HCG, the progesterone profile was normal but slightly increased up to the 9th luteal day subsequently falling to basal levels by the fourteenth luteal day.     

Induction of pre-ovulatory luteinizing hormone surge by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for women at risk for developing the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major risk inpatients undergoing ovulation induction protocols. Withholdinginjection of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may preventthe development of OHSS, but can also result in failure to ovulateand conceive. We have used a gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist (GnRHa) as an alternative to HCG in women not undergoingin-vitro fertilization in an attempt to prevent OHSS. The studyincluded 12 cycles in 12 women scheduled for ovulation inductionwith human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) who were at risk ofdeveloping OHSS (oestradiol>3500 pg/ml, number of follicles>20).GnRHa was injected to induce the pre-ovulatory, luteinizinghormone surge which triggers follicular maturation. Progesteronewas administered for luteal support. Six pregnancies were achieved,and none of the 12 women developed OHSS. Since the pregnancyrate in this study was acceptable, we can recommend the useof GnRHa instead of HCG in any case at risk of developing OHSS     

Oocyte and embryo quality as well as pregnancy rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not affected by high follicular phase serum progesterone

The effect of elevated serum progesterone concentrations (>1ng/1) on or before the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) injection on the outcome of women receiving gonadotrophin-releasinghormone analogue (GnRHa)/ human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)for ovarian stimulation prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI) was evaluated. A total of 1275 ICSI cycles were analysedretrospectively. In 53 cycles (4.5%), serum progesterone concentrationswere > 1 ng/ml. Patients in the high progesterone group hadsignificantly higher oestradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrationson the day of HCG injection. The characteristics of the cumulus-coronacell complexes and the nuclear maturity of the oocytes weresimilar in the groups of patients with high and low serum progesteronelevels. Fertilization and cleavage rates as well as embryo qualitywere not different in the two groups. No difference in implantationor clinical pregnancy rates was observed between the high progesteroneand low progesterone groups. Moreover, the cumulative exposureto progesterone during the follicular phase, as expressed bythe area under the curve (AUC), and the duration of exposureto high serum progesterone levels (>1 ng/ml) were not significantlydifferent between pregnant and non-pregnant women in the highprogesterone group. We conclude that in ICSI cycles pretreatedwith GnRHa, increased serum progesterone concentrations on orbefore the day of HCG injection do not affect ICSI outcome.