联合应用辛伐他汀和非诺贝特治疗混合性高脂血症的疗效及安全性观察

目的探讨联合应用辛伐他汀和非诺贝特治疗混合性高脂血症的临床疗效及安全性。方法共入选221例混合性高脂血症患,随机分入辛伐他汀组(10mg／d,n=72)、非诺贝特组(200mg/d,n=68)和联合治疗组(辛伐他汀10mg／d 非诺贝特200mg／d,n=81),疗程均为6个月。观察治疗前后主要血脂参数的变化率、达标率、总有效率以及不良反应。结果(1)联合治疗组血脂参数变化率最显,血清总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL—C)和甘油三酯(TG)分别下降30％、37％和56％,而血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)升高24％,其降低TG和升高HDL-C的能力不仅明显优于辛伐他汀组,而且也明显优于非诺贝特组(P值均小于0．01)。(2)按我国“血脂异常防治建议”的目标,联合治疗组TC、LDL—C和TG的达标率分别为51％、55％和61％,三项全部达标占45％,明显高于单药治疗组(P值均小于0．01),其治疗总有效率也明显优于单药治疗。(3)联合治疗组不良反应的发生率和单药治疗组相比差异无统计学意义(P值均大于0．05)。结论本研究结果提示,非诺贝特(200mg／d)与小剂量辛伐他汀(10mg／d)联合治疗可以更全面地改善混合性高脂血症患的血脂异常,较单药治疗更有效,具有良好的安全性和耐受性。     

Combination therapy with fluvastatin and fenofibrate in ischemic heart disease patients with combined hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes

AIM: To assess efficacy of combination therapy with fluvastatin and fenofibrate in ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with combined hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes. MATERIAL: Patients with IHD and combined hyperlipidemia with (n=56)) or without type 2 diabetes (n=30). METHODS: After 8-week diet period the patients were randomized to 4 weeks monotherapy with either fluvastatin (40 mg/day) or micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). In patients whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL CH) remained > 2,6 mmol/1 and triglycerides (TG) > 2.3 mmol/1 combination of fluvastatin 40 mg/day and fenofibrate 200 mg/day was used for the next 12 weeks. RESULTS: Target levels of LDL CH and TG were achieved in 75 and 88%, respectively, of diabetics, and in 73 and 88%, respectively, of non-diabetics. CONCLUSION: The use of combination of fluvastatin and fenofibrate was more effective then monotherapy for correction of lipid abnormalities in combined hyperlipidemia both in diabetics and non-diabetics with IHD.     

辛伐他汀并非诺贝特治疗急性冠脉综合征的疗效

目的：探讨联合应用辛伐他汀和非诺贝特对急性冠脉综合征（ACS）患者血脂参数及炎症因子的影响。方法：共人选58例ACS患者．随机分为：辛伐他汀组（20mg／d，18例）；非诺贝特组（200mg／d，18例）；联合治疗组（辛伐他汀20rag／d＋非诺贝特200mg／d，22例），疗程均为6个月。观察治疗前、后血清总胆固醇（TC）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）、甘油三酯（TG）、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL—C）、一氧化氮（NO）、内皮素（ET）和C反应蛋白（CRP）含量的变化，以及药物不良反应。结果：各组治疗后血清TC、LDL-C、TG水平显著降低（P均〈0.05），血清HDL—C水平有不同程度增高。其中以联合治疗组最为明显（P均〈0．05）。和辛伐他汀组相比，非诺贝特组TC和LDL-C水平无明显差异（P〉0．05），而TG水平显著降低，HDL—C水平明显增高（P〈0．05），与治疗前相比，各组治疗后血清NO水平增高，CRP和ET水平降低（P〈0．05），联合治疗组较辛伐他汀组、非诺贝特组更显著（P均〈0.05），三组均无不良反应。结论：联合辛伐他汀和非诺贝特治疗可以更全面地改善ACS患者的血脂异常，其改善内皮功能和降低炎症因子的作用较单药治疗更有效。     

Effects of adding fenofibrate (200 mg/day) to simvastatin (10 mg/day) in patients with combined hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome

Combined hyperlipidemia predisposes subjects to coronary heart disease. Two lipid abnormalities--increased cholesterol and atherogenic dyslipidemia--are potential targets of lipid-lowering therapy. Successful management of both may require combined drug therapy. Statins are effective low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering drugs. For atherogenic dyslipidemia (high triglycerides, small LDL, and low high-density lipoprotein [HDL]), fibrates are potentially beneficial. The present study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of a combination of low-dose simvastatin and fenofibrate in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia. It was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a crossover design. Three randomized phases were employed (double placebo, simvastatin 10 mg/day and placebo, and simvastatin 10 mg/day plus fenofibrate 200 mg/day). Each phase lasted 3 months, and in the last week of each phase, measurements were made of plasma lipids, lipoprotein cholesterol, plasma apolipoproteins B, C-II, and C-III and LDL speciation on 3 consecutive days. Simvastatin therapy decreased total cholesterol by 27%, non-HDL cholesterol by 30%, total apolipoprotein B by 31%, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) + intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) cholesterol by 37%, VLDL + IDL apolipoprotein B by 14%, LDL cholesterol by 28%, and LDL apolipoprotein B by 21%. The addition of fenofibrate caused an additional decrease in VLDL + IDL cholesterol and VLDL + IDL apolipoprotein B by 36% and 32%, respectively. Simvastatin alone caused a small increase in the ratio of large-to-small LDL, whereas the addition of fenofibrate to simvastatin therapy caused a marked increase in the ratio of large-to-small LDL species. Simvastatin alone produced a small (6%) and insignificant increase in HDL cholesterol concentrations. When fenofibrate was added to simvastatin therapy, HDL cholesterol increased significantly by 23%. No significant side effects were observed with either simvastatin alone or with combined drug therapy. Therefore, a combination of simvastatin 10 mg/day and fenofibrate 200 mg/day appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of atherogenic dyslipidemia in combined hyperlipidemia.     

Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes patients with combined hyperlipidaemia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes associated with combined hyperlipidaemia. A total of 216 patients with total cholesterol >/=200 mg/dl (>/=5.17 mmol/l) and triglycerides >/=200 and <800 mg/dl (>/=2.26 and <9.03 mmol/l) were randomised to one of two placebo groups, rosuvastatin 5 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 6 weeks (fixed-dose phase). During the subsequent 18-week dose-titration phase, one placebo group received titrated rosuvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg (placebo/rosuvastatin); one placebo group received titrated fenofibrate 67 mg once, twice and three times daily (placebo/fenofibrate); and patients receiving 5 or 10 mg rosuvastatin received titrated fenofibrate as above (rosuvastatin 5mg/fenofibrate and rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate groups). Doses were increased at 6-week intervals if low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remained >50 mg/dl (>1.3 mmol/l). At 24 weeks, the placebo/rosuvastatin group and placebo per fenofibrate group had triglyceride reductions of 30.3% versus 33.6%, respectively (P = NS), and LDL cholesterol was reduced by 46.7% in the rosuvastatin group and increased by 0.7% in the fenofibrate group (P < 0.001). The triglyceride reduction in the rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate group (47.1%) was significantly greater than in the placebo/rosuvastatin group (P = 0.001), with no significant differences in other lipid measures found between these two groups. No significant differences in effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were observed among treatment groups. In the fixed-dose phase, rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg reduced triglycerides by 24.5 and 29.5%, respectively, and decreased LDL cholesterol by 40.7 and 45.8%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. These results indicated that rosuvastatin produces marked reductions in triglycerides and LDL cholesterol when used alone or in combination with fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels and may constitute a valuable treatment option in the diabetic population.     

Comparison of effects of simvastatin alone versus fenofibrate alone versus simvastatin plus fenofibrate on lipoprotein subparticle profiles in diabetic patients with mixed dyslipidemia (from the Diabetes and Combined Lipid Therapy Regimen study)

Diabetes mellitus is a strong risk factor for atherosclerosis and is often characterized by dyslipidemia. Besides acting on traditional lipids, statins and fibrates may also exert beneficial effects on various pro- and antiatherogenic lipid subparticles. This analysis was undertaken to evaluate combination therapy on lipid subparticles in the Diabetes and Combined Lipid Therapy Regimen (DIACOR) study. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and no histories of coronary heart disease were evaluated (n = 498). Eligible patients underwent a 6- to 8-week washout period of all lipid-lowering medications and were enrolled if they demonstrated mixed dyslipidemia (having >or=2 of the following 3 lipid parameters: low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol >or=100 mg/dl, triglycerides >or=200 mg/dl, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dl). Patients were randomized to simvastatin 20 mg, fenofibrate 160 mg, or combined simvastatin 20 mg and fenofibrate 160 mg. Lipid subparticles were assessed 12 weeks after randomization by the Vertical Auto Profile II method. A total of 300 patients (mean age 61.6 +/- 11.5 years, 55% men) were randomized. Combination therapy was superior in lowering LDL cholesterol pattern B (-33.9 mg/dl) and dense very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.0 mg/dl) and increasing high-density lipoprotein3 (+2.3 mg/dl) and exerted the greatest change in altering the LDL cholesterol size profile. A potential effect on lipoprotein(a) (-0.5 mg/dl) was also found. For those with triglycerides >170 mg/dl, combination therapy was superior in lowering dense very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.7 mg/dl) and LDL cholesterol pattern B (-35.8 mg/dl), the lipids that tend to be formed in the presence of elevated triglycerides. In conclusion, in this trial of mixed dyslipidemic patients with diabetes, combination therapy was more effective in changing a variety of other cardiovascular risk markers.     

Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles

Given that combination therapy with statin plus fibrate confers a risk of myopathy, it is worthwhile to determine whether statin or fibrate monotherapy is associated with greater clinical benefit in individuals with combined hyperlipidemia. In this randomized double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of simvastatin and fenofibrate on indexes of endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery) and inflammatory markers (plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), soluble CD40, and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) levels), as surrogate indicators of future coronary heart disease (CHD), in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. A total of 70 patients with plasma triglyceride levels between 200 and 500 mg/dl and total cholesterol levels of >200 mg/dl were randomly assigned to receive either simvastatin (20 mg/day) (n=35) or micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day) (n=35) for 8 weeks. Treatment with simvastatin was associated with significantly greater reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), while the decrease in triglycerides was significantly greater in patients receiving fenofibrate. Both fenofibrate and simvastatin markedly reduced plasma levels of high-sensitivity CRP, IL-1β, and sCD40L, and improved endothelium-dependent FMD without mutual differences. The changes in plasma inflammatory markers did not correlate with baseline clinical characteristics in both groups. However, the improvement in FMD with fenofibrate treatment correlated inversely with baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, whereas the improvement in FMD with simvastatin treatment was positively related to HDL-C levels. Accordingly, in the subgroup with a baseline HDL-C of ≤40 mg/dl, only fenofibrate significantly improved the endothelium-dependent FMD. On the other hand, in the subgroup with HDL-C >40 mg/dl, only treatment with simvastatin achieved significant improvement in FMD. The data here indicate that in patients with combined hyperlipidemia, both fenofibrate and simvastatin have comparative beneficial effects on various inflammatory markers and differential beneficial effects on endothelial function according to baseline HDL-C levels. These findings should be validated by additional prospective studies, in which patients are stratified by baseline HDL-C prior to randomization.     

Comparison of combined statin-fibrate treatment to monotherapy in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND: Statins are the preferred drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, and fibrates for hypertriglyceridemia. In patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, monotherapy with one of these agents may not be effective and combined treatment may be preferable. AIM: To compare retrospectively the efficacy and safety of combined statin-fibrate treatment in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia in whom previous monotherapy with one of these agents occurred ineffective. METHODS AND RESULTS: The initial study group consisted of 327 patients who received micronised fenofibrate and 93 patients who received simvastatin for 12 months. Both agents caused significant changes in lipid profile. Following fibrate therapy, total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels decreased by 27.9%, 28.2% and 58%, respectively, and following simvastatin therapy by 33.6%, 42.8% and 37.5%, respectively. The HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) level increased after fenofibrate by 14.8% and remained unchanged following simvastatin therapy. The TC/HDL-C ratio decreased following fenofibrate by 35.6%, and following simvastatin by 35.3%. In some patients the required reduction in lipid parameters was not achieved fenofibrate or simvastatin. Subsequently, 93 patients underwent combined therapy by adding a second agent (simvastatin in a dose of 20 mg/day or fenofibrate in a dose of 200 mg per day) which was continued for another 12 months. The addition of simvastatin to fenofibrate decreased TC, LDL-C and TG levels by 35.5%, 42.1% and 59.6%, respectively in comparison to before treatment volumes. HDL-C level was increased by 11.1%, and TC/HDL-C ratio decreased by 45.3%. The addition of fenofibrate to simvastatin decreased TC, LDL-C and TG levels by 39.3%, 48.9% and 51,6%, respectively. HDL-C level was increased by 13.4%, and TC/HDL-C ratio decreased by 49.3%. No clinical side effects nor an increase in the transaminase levels, requiring termination of the treatment, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with 20 mg of simvastatin and 200 mg of micronised fenofibrate is highly effective and safe in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.     

Effect of combined fluvastatin-fenofibrate therapy compared with fenofibrate monotherapy in severe primary hypercholesterolemia. French Fluvastatin Study Group

This double-blind study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin-fenofibrate combination therapy compared with fenofibrate monotherapy in severe primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or =190 mg/dl [4.9 mmol/L], triglycerides < or =350mg/dl [3.9 mmol/l]). After a 10-week placebo and dietary baseline period, 102 patients were randomized to receive micronized fenofibrate 200 mg, fluvastatin 20 mg plus micronized fenofibrate 200 mg, or fluvastatin 40 mg plus micronized fenofibrate 200 mg. At week 16, fenofibrate 200 mg alone lowered LDL cholesterol from baseline by 21% compared with 32% for fluvastatin 20 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg and 41% for fluvastatin 40 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg (p <0.001). Triglycerides decreased by 29% with fenofibrate 200 mg alone, 39% with fluvastatin 20 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg, and 40% with fluvastatin 40 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg (p <0.05). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and measuring clinical laboratory parameters. The adverse event profile was similar for the 3 treatment groups. One patient withdrew due to an increase in transaminase levels. No significant increase in creatine phosphokinase levels was observed with combination therapy. In conclusion, the addition of fluvastatin to micronized fenofibrate results in substantial improvement in atherogenic plasma lipids and is well tolerated.     

Comparison of once-daily,niacin extended-release/lovastatin with standard doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin (the ADvicor Versus Other Cholesterol-Modulating Agents Trial Evaluation [ADVOCATE])

This study compared the relative efficacy of a once-daily niacin extended-release (ER)/lovastatin fixed-dose combination with standard doses of atorvastatin or simvastatin, with a special emphasis on relative starting doses. Subjects (n = 315) with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol blood levels (defined as LDL cholesterol blood levels > or =160 mg/dl without coronary artery disease, or > or =130 mg/dl if coronary artery disease was present, and HDL cholesterol <45 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women) were randomized to atorvastatin, simvastatin, or niacin ER/lovastatin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels from baseline. After 8 weeks, the starting dose niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg and the 10-mg starting dose atorvastatin both lowered mean LDL cholesterol by 38%. After 12 weeks, niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg lowered LDL cholesterol by 42% versus 34% with the 20-mg starting dose of simvastatin (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin increased HDL cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin or simvastatin at all compared doses (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin also provided significant improvements in triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein A-1, apolipoprotein B, and HDL subfractions. A total of 6% of study subjects receiving niacin ER/lovastatin withdrew because of flushing. No significant differences were seen among study groups in discontinuance due to elevated liver enzymes. No drug-induced myopathy was observed. Niacin ER/lovastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg and more effective than simvastatin 20 mg in reducing LDL cholesterol, was more effective in increasing HDL cholesterol than either atorvastatin or simvastatin, and provided greater global improvements in non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a).     

The effect of hormone replacement therapy alone and in combination with simvastatin on plasma lipids of hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease

Objectives. This study sought to compare hormone replacement therapy (HRT), simvastatin and their combination in the management of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease (CAD).Background. Lipid-lowering therapy reduces mortality in hypercholesterolemic women with CAD. In postmenopausal women HRT seems to increase survival, particularly those with ischemic heart disease, and this is partly due to changes in lipid levels.Methods. We studied 16 postmenopausal women with CAD and fasting total cholesterol <200 mg/dl and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <130 mg/dl. We compared HRT (0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate daily) with simvastatin (20 mg daily) and their combination in a randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study. Each treatment period was 8 weeks long with a 4-week washout interval between treatments.Results. Simvastatin, HRT and their combination significantly reduced total and LDL cholesterol by 35%, 13%, and 33% and 45%, 20%, and 46%, respectively, compared to placebo (p < 0.001). However, simvastatin and the combination was superior to HRT (p < 0.001), and none of our patients had total cholesterol <180 mg/dl and LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl on HRT alone. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not significantly affected by any of the active treatments, and triglycerides were lower during simvastatin therapy compared to placebo (p < 0.01). Apolipoprotein B was significantly reduced by simvastatin, alone and combined with HRT, by 39% and 35%, respectively, compared to placebo (p < 0.001). Alone and in combination with simvastatin, HRT significantly increased apolipoprotein A-I by 11% and 12%, respectively, compared to placebo (p < 0.05) and decreased lipoprotein (a) by 23% and 33%, respectively, compared to placebo (p < 0.05), whereas simvastatin had no significant effect on either of these parameters.Conclusions. In hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women with CAD, HRT exerts beneficial effects on plasma lipids but the levels currently recommended for secondary prevention are not achieved. Hormone replacement therapy combined with simvastatin is well tolerated and extremely effective, as the two therapies seem to be additive.     

Effects of simvastatin (40 and 80 mg/day) in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia

Mixed hyperlipidemia is characterized by both elevated total cholesterol and triglycerides. It is estimated to account for 10% to 20% of patients with dyslipidemia. This study assessed the lipid-altering efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day as monotherapy. One hundred thirty patients (62 women [48%], 24 [16%] with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mean age 53 years) with mixed hyperlipidemia (baseline low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol 156 mg/dl [mean], and triglycerides 391 mg/dl [median) were randomized in a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, 3-period, 22-week, balanced crossover study, and received placebo, and simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day each for 6 weeks. Compared with placebo, simvastatin produced significant (p <0.01) and dose-dependent changes in all lipid and lipoprotein parameters (LDL cholesterol 2.1%, -28.9%, and -35.5%; triglycerides -3.5%, -27.8%, and -33.0%; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.3%, 13.1%, and 15. 7%; apolipoprotein B 3.8%, -23.1%, and -30.6%; and apolipoprotein A-I 4.0%, 8.2%, and 10.5% with placebo, and simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day, respectively). The changes were consistent in patients with diabetes mellitus. One patient taking simvastatin 80 mg/day had an asymptomatic and reversible increase in hepatic transaminases 3 times above the upper limit of normal. Simvastatin 40 and 80 mg/day is effective in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia across the entire lipid and lipoprotein profile. The reductions in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides are large, significant, and dose dependent. The increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was greater than that observed in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and appears dose dependent.     

小剂量普伐他汀与非诺贝特联合治疗混合型高血脂症临床疗效及安全性

目的探讨小剂量普伐他汀与非诺贝特联合应用治疗混合型高血脂症的临床疗效及安全性。方法混合型高血脂症患者189例,随机分为3组,即普伐他汀组(10mg/d,n=64)、非诺贝特组(200mg/d,n=63)、联合治疗组(普伐他汀10mg/d+非诺贝特200mg/d,n=62),治疗12周;12周时单药治疗血脂水平未全部达标者再随机分为3组,即联合治疗组、普伐他汀20mg治疗组及非诺贝特组,再治疗12周。观察治疗前后主要血脂水平的变化率、达标率及不良反应。结果(1)12周时联合治疗组血清总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇LDL-C、三酰甘油(TG)下降的幅度及血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)升高的幅度均高于单独用药组(P值均<0.01);TC、LDL-C、TG3项全部达标率也高于单独用药组(P均<0.01)。(2)单独用药血脂参数未全部达标者(n=35)改为联合治疗组治疗12周后TC及LDL-C下降的幅度与普伐他汀20mg组比较,差异无统计学意义,而降低TG及升高HDL-C幅度高于普伐他汀20mg组(P值均<0.01);联合治疗组与单用非诺贝特组比较,降低TC、LDL-C、TG及升高HDL-C的幅度高于非诺贝特组(P值<0.01或<0.05);联合用药组3项全部达标率为44%,而普伐他汀20mg组及非诺贝特组全部达标为21%、17%(P值均<0.01)。(3)联合治疗的不良反应与单独用药相比没有明显增加。结论小剂量普伐他汀(10mg/d)与非诺贝特(200mg/d)联合治疗混合型高血脂症,较单独用药更有效、更全面地改善各项血脂水平,具有良好的安全性和耐受性。     

Effects of baseline level of triglycerides on changes in lipid levels from combined fluvastatin + fibrate (bezafibrate, fenofibrate, or gemfibrozil)

This analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of baseline triglyceride levels on lipid and lipoprotein changes after treatment with the combination of fluvastatin and fibrates. The analysis involved pooling data from 10 studies that included 1,018 patients with either mixed hyperlipidemia or primary hypercholesterolemia. Patients received a combination of fluvastatin and a fibrate (bezafibrate, fenofibrate, or gemfibrozil) from 16 to 108 weeks. The combination of fluvastatin and a fibrate improved lipid profiles, with reductions in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol that were dependent on baseline triglyceride levels. The greatest triglyceride reductions were observed in patients with high baseline triglyceride levels (> or =400 mg/dl) (41%, p <0.0001). The greatest LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol reductions occurred in patients with normal baseline triglyceride levels (<150 mg/dl) (35% and 33%, respectively; p <0.0001). The combined fluvastatin-fibrate therapy was well tolerated. Two patients (0.2%) (1 patient on fluvastatin 80 mg + gemfibrozil 1,200 mg and 1 patient on fluvastatin 20 mg + fenofibrate 200 mg) had creatine kinase levels > or =10 times the upper limit of normal, 11 patients (1.1%) had an elevation in alanine transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal, and 7 patients (0.7%) had elevations in aspartate transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal. Combined fluvastatin-fibrate therapy takes advantage of the complementary effects of the 2 agents, with the extent of triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol lowering dependent on baseline triglyceride levels. The combination of fluvastatin and fibrates was well tolerated with no major safety concerns.     

Effects of simvastatin on C-reactive protein in mixed hyperlipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic patients

This study examined the effects of simvastatin on C-reactive protein (CRP) and other inflammatory markers in study subjects with significant elevations in triglyceride (TG) blood levels. CRP, vascular cellular adhesion molecule (VCAM), serum amyloid A (SAA), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured in archived plasma samples from 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies designed to examine the lipid-altering efficacy of simvastatin in study subjects with elevated TGs. In the first study, 130 study subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or =130 mg/dl; TGs 300 to 700 mg/dl) received placebo or simvastatin 40 or 80 mg once daily for three 6-week periods in a complete-block crossover design. In the second study, 195 study subjects with hypertriglyceridemia (TGs 300 to 900 mg/dl) received daily doses of placebo or simvastatin 20, 40, or 80 mg for 6 weeks. Significant but weak correlations were observed between baseline CRP values and baseline levels of LDL cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not with TGs. CRP was also correlated with body mass index and fasting levels of glucose and insulin. Treatment with simvastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg led to significant reductions in CRP plasma levels versus placebo (p <0.05). Although CRP change was weakly correlated with changes in LDL cholesterol, TGs, and HDL cholesterol, results of regression analyses showed that only baseline CRP and treatment allocation were significant predictors of CRP response after 6 weeks of study drug administration. Simvastatin had no effect on VCAM, SAA, or IL-6. In summary, simvastatin significantly reduced CRP in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia.     

Treatment of high-risk patients with ezetimibe plus simvastatin co-administration versus simvastatin alone to attain National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals

This study assessed whether the co-administration of ezetimibe and simvastatin would be more effective than simvastatin monotherapy in allowing high-risk patients to achieve a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal of <100 mg/dl. Men and women with LDL cholesterol ≥130 mg/dl and meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalent were randomized to 1 of 4 daily treatments for 23 weeks: simvastatin 20 mg (n = 253), ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10 mg (n = 251), ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 20 mg (n = 109), and ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 40 mg (n = 97). In all groups, patients not at goal had their simvastatin doses doubled at weeks 6, 12, and/or 18, up to a maximum of 80 mg. The primary efficacy objective was LDL cholesterol goal attainment (<100 mg/dl) after 5 weeks of treatment. Ezetimibe plus any dose of simvastatin produced greater reductions in LDL cholesterol and allowed more patients to achieve goal after 5 weeks (p <0.001) and at the end of the study (p <0.001) than simvastatin 20 mg alone. At 5 weeks, 75%, 83%, and 87% of patients receiving ezetimibe plus simvastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg had LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl compared with 46% of patients receiving simvastatin 20 mg. In patients who started on ezetimibe plus simvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg, 33%, 22%, and 12%, respectively, required simvastatin titration during the study compared with 68% of patients who started on simvastatin 20 mg. The corresponding median simvastatin doses used were 10, 20, 40, and 40 mg, respectively. Ezetimibe plus simvastatin was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile similar to that of simvastatin monotherapy. Thus, through the dual inhibition of cholesterol absorption and synthesis, ezetimibe plus simvastatin allowed more patients to reach LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl at a lower simvastatin dose and with fewer dose titrations than simvastatin monotherapy.     

Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia

Aim: To evaluate the effects of the usual starting and next higher doses of ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin on the cholesterol content of lipoprotein subclasses in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia. Methods: This post hoc analysis compared the effects of treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg vs. atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg/day and ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg/day vs. atorvastatin 40 mg/day on the cholesterol content of lipoprotein subclasses in the modified intent‐to‐treat (mITT) population (n = 1013) and in subgroups of patients with triglyceride (TG) levels <200 mg/dl (n = 600) and ≥200 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l) (n = 413). Results: Ezetimibe/simvastatin significantly reduced low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) subclasses LDL₁‐C, LDL₂‐C and LDL₃‐C; real LDL‐C (LDL‐C^r); intermediate‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (IDL‐C), IDL₁‐C, IDL₂‐C; very low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL‐C), VLDL₃‐C; and remnant‐like lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP‐C) from baseline more than atorvastatin at all dose comparisons (p < 0.01) in the mITT population. Significant improvements were also observed in high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) subclass HDL₃‐C at the ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg vs. atorvastatin 20 mg and highest dose comparisons (p < 0.001) and in VLDL_{1 + 2}‐C at the lowest and highest dose comparisons (p < 0.001). Changes in LDL₄‐C and LDL‐C subclass patterns (A, B and I) were comparable for both treatments. Generally, similar results were observed for patients with TG levels <200 and ≥200 mg/dl (2.3 mmol). For both treatments, notable differences between TG subgroups were that patients with elevated TGs had smaller reductions in LDL₂‐C, slightly smaller decreases in all IDL subclasses and greater decreases in all VLDL‐C subclasses than those with lower TG levels. Frequency of pattern B was also reduced more in patients with higher TGs for both treatments. Conclusions: Ezetimibe/simvastatin reduced the cholesterol content of most lipoprotein subclasses from baseline with generally similar efficacy in patients with low and high TGs. Despite the different mechanism of action of ezetimibe, the response to ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin treatment related to these lipoprotein subclasses was generally consistent with the overall effects of these therapies on the major lipid/lipoprotein classes. The clinical significance of these results awaits further study.     

Changes in lipid metabolism and effect of simvastatin in renal transplant recipients induced by cyclosporine or tacrolimus

Hyperlipidemia is frequently developed following renal transplantation and results in worsening of the patient's prognosis. In study 1, the effects of immunosuppressants, cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus on serum lipids were compared in-patients undergoing renal transplantation. The study included 32 cases of renal transplantation recipients who randomized to the CsA treatment group (15 patients) and the tacrolimus group (17 patients). Before and 1 month after the transplantation, we assessed the serum lipid levels, apolipoprotein levels, the concentrations of cholesterol in the respective lipoprotein fractions and the enzyme activities related to lipid-metabolism. The serum lipid levels in both groups were significantly increased at 1 month after renal transplantation. In the CsA group, there were significant increases in cholesterol contents in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), LDL2 and HDL2 fractions, whereas, in the tacrolimus group, cholesterol content was increased in VLDL and HDL2 fractions. In study 2, 1 month after renal transplantation, 19 patients with hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol (TC) >200 mg/dl) and hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride (TG) >150 mg/dl) were treated with simvastatin 5-10 mg/day for 6 months. Simvastatin treatment significantly decreased serum TC (240+/-29-200+/-22 mg/dl, P<0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 114+/-20-99+/-17 mg/dl, P<0.05) and TG levels (217+/-103-130+/-38 mg/dl, P<0.01). In addition, there were significant decreases in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C; 53+/-20-34+/-15 mg/dl, P<0.001). The Cmax and AUC of simvastatin were increased about eight-fold, when simvastatin was given in combination with CsA. In contrast, no significant changes in simvastatin levels were observed when combination with tacrolimus. Although simvastatin levels were increased with CsA, there were no abnormal changes in renal and liver functions, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels or in incidence of adverse effects.     

Beneficial effects of rosuvastatin alone and in combination with extended-release niacin in patients with a combined hyperlipidemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

Patients with combined hyperlipidemia and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels may benefit from combination therapy with a statin and niacin; therefore, we assessed the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and extended-release (ER) niacin alone and in combination in 270 patients with this atherogenic dyslipidemia. Men and women > or =18 years with fasting total cholesterol levels > or =200 mg/dl, triglycerides 200 to 800 mg/dl, apolipoprotein B > or cf=110 mg/dl, and HDL cholesterol <45 mg/dl were randomized to 1 of 4 treatments in this 24-week, open-label, multicenter trial: rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg; ER niacin 0.5 to 2 g; rosuvastatin 40 mg/ER niacin 0.5 to 1 g; or rosuvastatin 10 mg/ER niacin 0.5 to 2 g. Percent changes from baseline in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and other lipid measurements at week 24 were determined by analysis of variance, with statistical testing performed separately between the rosuvastatin monotherapy group and each remaining treatment group. Daily doses of rosuvastatin 40 mg reduced LDL and non-HDL cholesterol significantly more than either ER niacin 2 g or rosuvastatin 10 mg/ER niacin 2 g (-48% vs -0.1% and -36% for LDL cholesterol and -49% vs -11% and -38% for non-HDL cholesterol, respectively; p <0.01 for all comparisons); no additional reduction in LDL or non-HDL cholesterol was observed with the combination of rosuvastatin 40 mg/ER niacin 1.0 g (-42% and -47%; p = NS). Triglyceride reductions ranged from -21% (ER niacin monotherapy) to -39% (rosuvastatin 40 mg/ER niacin 1 g), but no observed differences were statistically significant. Compared with rosuvastatin alone, rosuvastatin 10 mg/ER niacin 2 g produced significantly greater increases in HDL cholesterol (11% vs 24%, p <0.001) and apolipoprotein A-I (5% vs 11%, p <0.017). Similar increases in HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I were noted between the monotherapy groups. Over 24 weeks, rosuvastatin alone was better tolerated than either ER niacin alone or the combinations of rosuvastatin and ER niacin.     

The reduction of inflammatory biomarkers by statin, fibrate, and combination therapy among diabetic patients with mixed dyslipidemia: the DIACOR (Diabetes and Combined Lipid Therapy Regimen) study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the effect of statin-fibrate combination therapy on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with diabetes. BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is a long-term, chronic inflammatory disease that is exacerbated in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Patients (n = 300) with type II diabetes, mixed dyslipidemia (2 or more of low-density lipoprotein > or =100 mg/dl, triglycerides > or =200 mg/dl, or high-density lipoprotein <40 mg/dl), and no history of coronary heart disease were randomly assigned to receive simvastatin 20 mg, fenofibrate 160 mg, or a combination of simvastatin 20 mg and fenofibrate 160 mg daily. At 12 weeks after randomization, we measured levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA(2)). RESULTS: At 12 weeks, median hsCRP was significantly reduced (-14.6%, p = 0.004) from baseline, but the effect did not differ between treatments. The effect was greatest among patients with baseline hsCRP levels >2.0 mg/l (fenofibrate = -18.9%, p = 0.002 vs. baseline; simvastatin = -24.8%, p < 0.0001; combination = -27.3%, p = 0.002). Likewise, median Lp-PLA(2) levels in the overall study population were significantly reduced (-16.8%, p < 0.0001), and the effect did not differ among treatments. This effect also was greatest among patients with increased baseline levels of Lp-PLA(2) greater than the median of 320.9 ng/ml (fenofibrate = -41.3%, p < 0.0001; simvastatin = -47.5%, p < 0.0001; combination = -46.8%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin, fenofibrate, and combination therapy each lowered hsCRP and Lp-PLA(2). These anti-inflammatory effects were most pronounced among patients with increased baseline levels. Combination therapy was no more effective than either form of monotherapy. (The DIACOR Study; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00309712?order=1).