C4d and/or immunoglobulins deposition in peritubular capillaries in perioperative graft biopsies in ABO-incompatible renal transplantation

Abstract:  We evaluated 0 h and/or 1 h graft biopsy specimens from 14 recipients in ABO-incompatible renal transplantation using immunofluorescence for C4d, IgG, and IgM. All 0 h biopsy specimens revealed negative C4d, IgG, and IgM deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC). In contrast, 8 of 14 1 h biopsy specimens revealed a positive C4d deposition in PTC. Eight specimens revealed positive IgM staining and seven of them had both C4d and IgM depositions. Three specimens had C4d, IgM, and IgG depositions in PTC. Three of eight patients with C4d deposition and two of six patients without C4d deposition in the 1 h biopsy group suffered from acute rejection within 1 month of transplantation. These findings suggest that complement fragments and immunoglobulin deposition in PTC in ABO-incompatible renal grafts can start soon after reperfusion, although acute rejection may or may not develop.     

Complement fragment C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries in acute humoral rejection after ABO blood group-incompatible human kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is the most important risk factor for early graft loss in ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation (RTx). The pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria for AHR after ABO-i RTx remain unclear. Complement fragment C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC), which is a sensitive indicator for activation of the classical complement pathway, was studied to establish the pathologic diagnostic indicator of AHR. METHODS: Forty-four graft biopsy specimens from 19 patients with ABO-i living donors were analyzed within 90 days after RTx. Nineteen biopsy specimens with acute rejection after ABO-compatible (ABO-c) living-related RTx were used as controls. Diffuse and bright C4d deposition in PTC was considered significantly positive. RESULTS: All of 8 recipients with AHR showed significantly positive C4d in PTC in the ABO-i group, but 9 of 11 recipients without AHR were negative. In the ABO-c RTx group, 16 of 19 recipients were negative for C4d in PTC. The prevalence of C4d in PTC was significantly higher in ABO-i RTx (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: C4d deposition is valuable as a specific and sensitive indicator for AHR, even of mild severity, in ABO-i RTx.     

Complement C4d deposition in transplanted kidneys: preliminary report on long-term graft survival

Abstract:  The effects of antibody-mediated rejection on long-term graft survival have not been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to clarify the influence on long-term survival of deposition of the complement split product C4d in allografts using polyclonal anti-C4d antibody. Inclusion criteria were recipients who underwent graft biopsy during acute deterioration of graft function within the first 2 yr after transplantation. Patients whose graft did not survive more than 1 yr and who received graft from an human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling or an ABO-incompatible donor were excluded. Among the 92 recipients investigated, 22 (23.9%) had peritubular capillary C4d deposition, 15 (16.3%) had glomerular capillary C4d deposition and seven (7.6%) had both peritubular and glomerular capillary C4d deposition. Twenty of these 22 patients revealed acute cellular rejection, including borderline changes. There was no significant relationship between pathological severity of acute rejection and presence or absence of peritubular capillary C4d deposition. Graft survival was inferior in patients with peritubular capillary C4d deposition to that in patients without C4d deposition (p = 0.0419). Graft survival in patients with glomerular C4d deposition did not differ from that in patients without C4d deposition. In conclusion, C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries has a substantial impact on long-term graft survival.     

C4d complement split product expression in chronic rejection of renal allograft

Chronic allograft rejection remains the major cause of late renal graft loss. Its pathogenesis is complex, depending on both immunological and nonimmunological factors. An important role in development of chronic rejection is ascribed to an ongoing immunological reaction mainly of the humoral type. C4d complement split product, as a stable fragment of complement degradation activated by antigen-antibody complexes, is considered to be an indicator of humoral activity in allografts. The aim of the present study was to establish a correlation between C4d expression and morphological findings specific for chronic rejection among biopsy specimens from patients with deteriorating graft function versus protocol biopsy specimens versus biopsy specimens of native kidneys with glomerular diseases. C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries and glomeruli were observed in 83% of patients with morphological changes of chronic rejection. No C4d expression was found in the protocol biopsy group. C4d deposits in glomeruli localizations were found in kidneys from patients with glomerulopathies; the pattern of distribution was similar to that for antibodies characteristic for glomerulonephritis. There was a positive correlation between C4d expression and morphological features of chronic rejection. In our opinion, only peritubular capillary localization is specific for a rejection process; glomerular localization is nonspecific and probably secondary to antigen-antibody complex deposition in course of some types of glomerulopathies.     

C4d deposition without rejection correlates with reduced early scarring in ABO-incompatible renal allografts

C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries is a specific marker for the presence of antidonor antibodies in renal transplant recipients and is usually associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in conventional allografts. In ABO-incompatible grafts, however, peritubular capillary C4d is often present on protocol biopsies lacking histologic features of AMR; the significance of C4d in this setting remains unclear. For addressing this, data from 33 patients who received ABO-incompatible renal allografts (after desensitization) were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1 and/or 3 and 6 mo after transplantation in each recipient and at 12 mo in 28 recipients. Twenty-one patients (group A) had strong, diffuse peritubular capillary C4d staining without histologic evidence of AMR or cellular rejection on their initial protocol biopsies. The remaining 12 patients (group B) had negative or weak, focal peritubular capillary C4d staining. Three grafts (two in group B) were lost but not as a result of AMR. Excluding these three patients, serum creatinine levels were similar in the two groups at 6 and 12 mo after transplantation and at last follow-up; however, recipients in group A developed significantly fewer overall chronic changes, as scored by the sum of Banff chronic indices, than group B during the first year after transplantation. These results suggest that diffuse peritubular capillary C4d deposition without rejection is associated with a lower risk for scarring in ABO-incompatible renal allografts; the generalizability of these results to conventional allografts remains unknown.     

Peritubular capillary C4d deposition and renal outcome in post-transplant IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUNDS: Immunological staining of the transplanted kidney for C4d in peritubular capillaries (C4d(PTC)) has emerged as a useful method to detect antibody-mediated rejection in situ. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the prevalence of C4d(PTC) deposition in allograft renal biopsies diagnosed of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and analysed its clinical significance. METHOD: Sixty-six biopsy specimens of post-transplant IgAN, which were obtained to evaluate azotemia and/or heavy proteinuria, were examined by immunohistochemical staining of the paraffin sections with polyclonal antibody for C4d. RESULTS: C4d was stained positively in peritubular capillaries in 16 (24%) of the 66 cases. The C4d(PTC)-negative (n=50) and C4d(PTC)-positive groups (n=16) were not different in recipient gender, age, donor age, type of donor (living vs. cadaveric), interval from transplantation to graft biopsy (41.6+/- 21.8 vs. 48.3+/-26.1 months) and post-biopsy follow-up period (60.3+/-23.3 vs. 56.9+/-25.4 months). During the follow-up period, 12 of 50 (24%) although the incidence of graft failure was not different by the C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries, intervals from renal biopsy to graft failure tended to be shorter in C4d(PTC)-positive cases than C4d(PTC)-negative cases. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the renal allograft function of the C4d(PTC)-positive group deteriorated more rapidly than that of the C4d(PTC)-negative group (p<0.05). Histologically, the C4d(PTC)-positive group had findings suggestive of acute cellular rejection more commonly than the C4d(PTC)-negative group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of humoral rejection, as demonstrated by C4d(PTC) deposition, was concurrently present in significant portions of post-transplant IgAN biopsy specimens and was associated with more rapid deterioration of renal function. These results suggest that C4d(PTC) positivity needs to be determined at the time of biopsy even in cases of post-transplant glomerulonephritis and immunosuppression may need to be modified accordingly.     

Histological analysis of late renal allografts of antidonor antibody positive patients with C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries

Abstract:  The association of humoral immunity with late renal allograft dysfunction has recently been recognized, and many reports have revealed C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (C4d in PTC), and the presence of serum antidonor HLA antibody in patients suffering from graft dysfunction, long time after transplantation. In this study, morphological changes in renal allograft biopsies more than 1 year after transplantation in 14 patients with C4d in PTC and serum antidonor antibody were investigated for the presence of chronic rejection (CR). In addition to the light microscope study, an electron microscope study was done to evaluate the multilayering of the peritubular capillary basement membrane (MLPTC). Histologically, only seven of 14 patients met the criteria of CR, and 71.4% (5/7) of CR patients had episodes of acute humoral rejection (AHR), coexisting with acute tubulointerstitial rejection. Peritubular capillaritis was observed in all patients, although it differed in severity. Transplant glomerulitis and interstitial inflammation were also observed in many patients: 71.4% (10/14) and 92.9% (13/14) respectively. MLPTC was observed in 12 patients (85.7%), but the severity of the MLPTC did not reflect the severity of peritubular capillaritis or any other histological features. The long-term outcomes of the patients CR, especially those with episodes of AHR, were poor, and two of them lost their graft functions. On the other hand, patients without CR had relatively favourable outcomes. In conclusion, we confirmed the diverse morphological changes of late renal allografts, which cannot be categorized as chronic humoral rejection (CHR), and such patients who do not have typical morphological changes such as CHR, should be followed-up on a long-term basis in order to clarify the significance of C4d on PTC in late renal allografts.     

C4d deposition in the glomeruli and peritubular capillaries associated with transplant glomerulopathy

Transplant glomerulopathy (TGP) is a unique disease entity with characteristic pathological findings. Although ultrastructural studies for TGP have been performed, histogenesis of TGP is not fully understood. The present study was designed to investigate the relation of complement fragment C4d to the histogenesis of TGP. Nine cases of isolated TGP were randomly selected. A commercially available monoclonal antibody against complement fragment C4d was used in allograft biopsies. To evaluate the extent and severity of deposition of the C4d complement in the glomerular and peritubular capillaries, indirect immunofluoresce method was performed on frozen sections. Intense deposition of C4d in the glomerular basement membrane and peritubular capillaries was found in association with morphological appearance of TGP. Peritubular capillaries were affected in all the patients, showing splitting and multilayering of peritubular capillary basement membrane. These changes, which diffusely affect most capillaries, and their severity pattern were quite similar in each patient. In early stages of all patients with cellular rejection, C4d was not detected in the glomerular and peritubular capillaries. In addition, no C4d deposition was detected in all zero-hour biopsies without diagnostic abnormality. These findings suggest that C4d deposition in the glomerular and peritubular capillaries might be associated with the pathogenesis of TGP in renal transplantation.     

When renal allografts turn DARC

BACKGROUND: The Duffy antigen-receptor for chemokines (DARC) is a chemokine-binding protein that is up-regulated on peritubular capillaries (PTC) during cellular renal allograft rejection. C4d deposition and accumulation of inflammatory cells in PTC are indicators of humoral renal allograft rejection. Because DARC is expressed at the site of C4d deposition and might be involved in inflammatory cell recruitment, the authors evaluated the expression of DARC in different forms of human renal allograft rejection. METHODS: Deposition of C4d and DARC expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 42 renal transplant biopsy specimens. Biopsy specimens were subdivided according to histologic and immunohistochemical results, that is, C4d-negative biopsy specimens with (Banff 1, n=8) or without signs of cellular rejection (n=16), and C4d-positive biopsies (humoral rejection) with (Banff 1 rejection, n=7) or without cellular rejection (n=11). RESULTS: DARC expression was found on a small number of PTC and veins in patients without rejection. Cellular and humoral rejection led to a comparable increase in the number of DARC-positive PTC (9.7 and 8.7 vs. 2.6 vessels per high-power field [HPF], respectively). The highest numbers were found in biopsy specimens with signs of both humoral and cellular rejection (17.5 vessels per HPF). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that demonstrates an induction of a chemokine-binding protein at the site of C4d deposition in humoral allograft rejection. The additive effect of humoral and cellular rejection on DARC expression might imply different pathways of DARC induction for different forms of allograft rejection.     

Complement activation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies after living-donor transplantation

BACKGROUND: To gain insight into complement activation in kidney grafts, we studied the deposition of components from all complement pathways in protocol biopsies from living-donor recipients that were taken 1 week (median 7 days) after transplantation. METHODS: Graft protocol biopsies (n=37) were taken consecutively and stained for two-color immunofluorescence, with antibodies to C4d, C3, C1q, factor B, C6, terminal C5b-9 complement complex, mannose-binding lectin (MBL), and MBL-associated serine protease-1, combined with an endothelial marker. Light and electron microscopy were performed in all cases. Clinical acute rejection (AR), graft loss, and long-term kidney function were recorded. Baseline biopsies from 15 of the patients served as controls. RESULTS: Endothelial C4d deposition was demonstrated in peritubular capillaries in 11 of 37 cases (30%), of which 9 of 11 (82%) experienced clinical AR but only 6 of 11 (55%) experienced AR as defined by histopathologic criteria. Biopsies from three patients, two with early graft loss, showed diffuse global C4d in the glomerular endothelium with codeposition of C3 in all patients and MBL-associated serine protease-1 in one patient. Focal peritubular capillary C3 deposition was found in two additional C4d-positive cases with AR. No posttransplant deposition was demonstrated for the other components. CONCLUSIONS: Early diffuse C4d deposition in the kidney graft capillaries is closely related to acute humoral rejection, whereas focal staining may occur with mild AR or, rarely, without rejection. Codeposition of C3 indicates early AR with a higher risk of graft loss. In most cases, activation was limited to C4d, indicating efficient in situ regulation of complement activation.     

C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies

BACKGROUND: Deposition of the complement protein C4d in renal allograft biopsies obtained during graft dysfunction and rejection has been proposed to be a sensitive marker of antibody-mediated acute rejection. To determine the diagnostic specificity of C4d deposition, it is important to study biopsies from allografts with no evidence of dysfunction. In this study, we examined C4d deposition in protocol biopsies obtained irrespective of clinical status. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed on routine protocol biopsies preimplantation and on day 7 posttransplantation from 48 unselected renal allografts. Serum samples obtained up to 1 month after transplantation were assayed for donor-reactive antibodies (DRA). Results were correlated with histopathology and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d deposition was detected in the peritubular capillaries of 6 of 48 (13%) biopsies. C4d deposition was present in 5 of 15 (33%) biopsies that showed acute rejection (Banff 97, category 4) but only in 1 of 33 (3%) biopsies with no rejection (P=0.003, 97% specificity). Posttransplant DRAs were detected in 21 of 48 (44%) patients. All five recipients with C4d deposition and rejection had posttransplant DRA; the recipient whose biopsy showed C4d positivity, but not rejection, did not have detectable DRA. C4d deposition was not treated with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin and was not associated with poor posttransplant graft outcome at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in early posttransplant protocol biopsies, C4d is a specific marker for the presence of humoral rejection, as indicated by its association with DRA and acute histologic rejection.     

Clearance of C4d deposition after successful treatment of acute humoral rejection in follow-up biopsies: a report of three cases

Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is currently perceived as an immunological reaction against donor antigens mediated by complement-binding antibodies. C4d, a split product of complement activation and bound to endothelial cells of the peritubular capillaries, is used as a diagnostic marker for AHR. We report on three patients with biopsy-proven acute humoral rejection who were treated initially with plasmapheresis (PS). As two of the patients did not recover renal function, and biopsy showed persistent C4d staining after PS, immunoadsorption (IAS) was additionally performed on them. In all patients, renal function recovered, and follow-up biopsies in two patients showed complete disappearance of C4d, 29 days and 58 days after transplantation and only minimal residual C4d deposits in one patient 48 days after transplantation. We conclude that successful treatment of AHR is followed by complete resolution of serological and histological markers of AHR, displayed by the disappearance of C4d.     

Complement activation in acute humoral renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries.

The distinction between acute humoral rejection (AHR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) in renal allografts is therapeutically important, but pathologically difficult. Since AHR is probably mediated by antibodies to the donor endothelium that activate the classical complement pathway, it was hypothesized that peritubular capillary C4d deposition might distinguish this group. Renal biopsies (n = 16) from 10 patients with AHR who had acute graft dysfunction, neutrophils in peritubular capillaries, and a concurrent positive cross-match were stained for C4d by immunofluorescence. Control biopsies for comparison showed ACR (n = 14), cyclosporin A toxicity (n = 6), or no abnormality (n = 4). Peribiopsy sera were tested for anti-donor HLA antibody. C4d deposited prominently and diffusely in the peritubular capillaries in all AHR biopsies (16 of 16). IgM and/or C3 were also present in 19 and 44%, respectively. With two-color immunofluorescence, C4d was localized in basement membranes (type IV collagen+) and in the endothelium (Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I+). In ACR, no more than trace C4d was found in peritubular capillaries (P < 0.0001 versus AHR), and no patient had anti-donor HLA antibodies (0 of 8); 27% had neutrophils in peritubular capillaries. One of six biopsies with cyclosporin A toxicity had similar C4d deposits, and circulating anti-donor class I antibody was detected. Grafts with AHR were lost (40%) more often than those with ACR (0%; P < 0.02). C4d in peritubular capillary walls distinguishes AHR from ACR, is more specific and sensitive than traditional criteria, and is a potentially valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of graft dysfunction.     

Immunohistochemical evidence of activated lectin pathway in kidney allografts with peritubular capillary C4d deposition.

BACKGROUND: Complement 4d (C4d) deposition in the peritubular capillary (PTC) in the kidney allograft is a useful diagnostic marker for humoral rejection. C4d is produced not only by the classical pathway but also by the lectin pathway of the complement activation cascade. We have recently reported the in situ role of the later phase of the complement cascade in renal allografts with C4d deposition; however, the initial process prior to C4d deposition is yet to be resolved. METHODS: To clarify the early phases of the complement activation cascade, we evaluated the deposition of initial proteins of the above two pathways; IgG, IgM, mannose-binding lectin (MBL), H-ficolin, L-ficolin, MBL-associated serine protease (MASP)-1 and MASP-2 in kidney allografts with PTC C4d deposition. RESULTS: Sixty kidney allograft specimens were divided into two groups on the basis of the presence of C4d deposition in PTC. The C4d-positive group (n = 18) included nine ABO-identical and nine ABO-incompatible cases, and the C4d-negative group (n = 42) had 34 ABO-identical and eight ABO-compatible (but not identical) cases. In the C4d-positive group, 16 of 18 cases showed diffuse H-ficolin and IgM deposition in PTC. In contrast, H-ficolin and IgM were not detected in PTC in the C4d-negative group. Other initial proteins were not detected in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested for the first time that the lectin pathway activated by H-ficolin may be involved in C4d deposition on PTC in the kidney allograft.     

A retrospective study of plasma cell infiltrates in explanted renal allografts

Renal transplantation is the most effective therapy in end-stage renal disease. The prognosis for transplant survival is still determined by rejection. When plasma cells predominate in the cellular infiltrate of allografts in rejection, it is called plasma cell-rich rejection, which has a poor prognosis. To study the correlation between plasma cell infiltration and humoral rejection, and to explore whether the local plasma cells were involved in renal allograft loss we analyzed 40 explanted grafts and 20 specimens removed for other diseases. All specimens were embedded, deparaffined, and stained with hematoxylin eosin (HE) for analysis by immunohistochemistry (IH). Renal allograft rejection was classified according to the Banff 1997 criteria with examinations for C4d deposition and CD138 expression. Positive C4d staining was defined by linear endothelial C4d deposition in > or =25% of cortical peritubular capillaries. The specimens designated as CD138-positive demonstrated strong and diffuse staining characteristics; trace or rare CD138-positive were classified as negative. Our results showed that among 40 renal graft specimens, 17 cases were C4d-positive, 23 cases were CD138-positive, and 13 cases were C4d and CD138 double-positive, namely, 42.5%, 57.5%, and 32.5%, respectively. Among the double-positive cases, there were 2 patients with a diagnosis of acute cellular rejection, 1 with hyperacute rejection, and 10 with chronic humoral rejection. C4d deposition and CD138-positive plasma cell infiltrate were related by a Spearman analysis (r = 0.330; P = .038). In the control group, there was only 1 case showing C4d positive activities. These observations suggested that infiltrated plasma cells in the renal allograft probably participate in humoral rejection through local secretion of antibodies.     

Blood group Lewis alloantibodies cause antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients

Three patients with negative Lewis phenotypes who displayed anti-Lewis antibodies suffered severe kidney allograft dysfunction. One woman and two men (22-44 years) received ABO compatible kidney transplants with negative donor-recipient cross-match tests. Two patients had the phenotype Le(a-b-) with anti-Le(a) and anti-Le(b) complement binding antibodies. The third patient of phenotype Le(a+b-) developed anti-Lewis(b) antibody a few months after transplantation. One patient presented recurrence of worsened graft function from the day 6 to 4 months after transplantation; despite treatment there was not full recovery. The second patient had recurrences of acute graft dysfunction at 4 and 6 months after transplantation with nephrotic range proteinuria. The third patient showed progressive graft dysfunction at 7 months after transplantation. Biopsy specimens showed histological changes of antibody-mediated rejection. In the third patient, we observed fibrinoid necrosis and thrombosis of arterioles and glomerular capillaries. Immunofluorescence studies showed immunoglobulin IgG and IgM in glomerular capillaries and C4d and C3 on endothelial cells of peritubular capillaries. Posttransplantation cross-match tests with donor lymphocytes were negative. Anti-Lewis antibodies were observed during follow-up. All patients were treated with methylprednisolone boluses. In addition, one subject received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 1 received plasmapheresis. Two patients had moderate renal dysfunction (creatinine levels 1.8 and 1.9 mg/dL) after 8-17 months follow-up. The third patient lost her graft at 11 months after transplantation. Lewis antibodies may injure a renal allograft. C4d deposition and failure to show donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies suggested the participation of other antibodies.     

Therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by acute graft dysfunction associated with de novo production of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) and C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries of the renal allograft. It has been reported the combination of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) as effective rescue therapy for established AHR. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, seven kidney allografts recipients suffered from AHR diagnosed by severe rejection and C4d staining in peritubular capillaries. All patients had a negative cross-match before renal transplantation. RESULTS: All patients were treated with daily sessions of PP and in four cases IVIG was added after the last PP session. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were employed as maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In one case, rituximab was added to PP and IVIG owing to refractory humoral rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 100%, allograft survival was 70%, and the mean serum creatinine was 201 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: AHR is a severe form of rejection associated with a poor prognosis, but its early diagnosis and treatment with PP and IVIG allows reversal of AHR reaching a 70% graft survival at 1 year.     

Acute Humoral Rejection in Hepatitis C-Infected Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Antiviral Therapy

The use of interferon-alpha (IFN) in hepatitis C (HCV)-infected renal recipients has been associated with acute rejection and graft loss. We reviewed our recent experience in HCV (+) renal recipients treated with antiviral therapy for biopsy proven chronic hepatitis C. Twelve HCV (+) recipients who recently received antiviral therapy were analyzed. Post-treatment sera were tested for donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA). Within 6 months of initiating antiviral therapy, two of 12 patients (17%) developed acute rejection, which was characterized as acute humoral rejection (de novo DSA in serum and C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries). Both progressed to graft failure. Nine of the remaining 10 patients tested did not have DSA. The use of IFN was associated with severe acute humoral rejection (C4d +, DSA +). The recognition of IFN-associated acute humoral rejection in this series may explain the high rate of graft loss reported previously in renal recipients receiving IFN.     

Adult living-donor liver transplantation with ABO-incompatible grafts

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation using ABO-incompatible grafts is rarely performed because the reported outcome is poorer than with compatible grafts. We report our positive experience with adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) using ABO-incompatible grafts. METHODS: The immunosuppressive protocol consisted of plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin infusion before LDLT followed by thymoglobulin induction and splenectomy, maintenance with tacrolimus/cyclosporine (FK/CSA), mycophenolate mofetil, and a rapid steroid taper. Plasmapheresis was planned for up to 3 months after LDLT aiming at maintaining the anti-ABO titers level below 1:16. Liver biopsies were routinely stained for humoral rejection with complement 4d (C4d) and for biliary damage with cytokeratin 7. RESULTS: Between January 2003 and September 2004, five patients, mean age 59 years, received an ABO-incompatible LDLT. Patient and graft survival was 80% at mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 34-54) for the four surviving patients. One patient died 4 months after LDLT. Humoral rejection occurred in one patient whereas acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: ABO-incompatible LDLT can be performed with patient and graft survival similar to compatible LDLT. Minimization of immunosuppression is possible, and chronic biliary damage is not the norm. Better tools than complement 4d staining must be researched to diagnose the features of immunologic damage to the graft. If these results will be confirmed in a greater number of patients, ABO-incompatible LDLT may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are not available or when the ABO-incompatible donor is the better candidate.