腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的应用体会

目的：探讨腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的临床应用价值及安全性。方法：2005年8月至2006年10月我院为8例腹壁切口疝患者使用自膨胀式聚丙烯-膨化聚四氟乙烯双面复合型补片行腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术,其中2例联合行胆囊切除术。结果：8例手术均获成功,手术时间55～150min,平均85min,无手术死亡病例及并发症发生,患者术后8～24h后下床活动,1—2d排气,术后疼痛轻,2—3d后完全缓解,3—7d（平均4d）患者顺利康复出院。随访12～24个月无复发。结论：腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术安全可靠,具有创伤小、术后康复快、并发症少、不增加手术穿刺孔、可完成联合手术等优点,临床应用前景广阔。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补要点

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见并发症,其发生率为2%～11%,且不能自愈,需手术治疗.单纯直接缝合修补的复发率可高达50%左右,巨大切口疝修补更是外科治疗的难点[1,2].     

老年腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜下修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2006年6月对17例老年切口疝患者行腹腔镜下应用补片切口疝修补术。结果 16例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间65～132min,平均95min。术后恢复排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：疼痛3个月以上者3例,浆液肿5例,穿刺口感染1例,均经保守治疗后好转,无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访7～26个月（平均13个月）,未见切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解,采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片修补老年腹壁切口疝安全、有效。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术18例体会

目的探讨腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的临床应用价值及安全性。方法回顾分析2007年9月至2009年3月18例大或巨大腹壁切口疝患者采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床资料。结果18例手术均在腹腔镜下完成,其中1例术中因广泛致密黏连,做小切口直视下分离黏连回纳疝内容物后缝合切口腹腔镜下完成后续操作,手术时间45—90min,平均60min;术后4—48h患者下床活动,1—2天排气,术后疼痛轻,3—6天后大部分患者疼痛明显缓解,术后住院3～14天,平均5天,术后随访2～20个月,1例诉慢性疼痛,1例术后1个月出现补片感染,后经开腹取出补片膨体聚四氟乙烯面,随访5个月未见疝复发。结论腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝相对于开放修补方法具有微创、恢复快、并发症少等优点,是一种安全可靠的手术方法。     

腹腔镜与开放式巨大腹壁切口疝补片修补术的对比分析

目的:比较开放手术及腹腔镜补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术效果。方法:回顾分析我院2003年1月至2007年6月收治的43例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(16例)和开放组(27例),对两组手术时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间等进行对比分析。结果:两组手术时间、术后并发症发生率无明显差异。开放手术组2例发生切口感染,1例经冲洗引流2个月治愈,另1例再次手术取出补片。腹腔镜手术组术后住院时间和手术出血量明显少于开放手术组。术后随访4~48个月,平均21个月,两组均无复发病例。结论:腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝同样安全、合理,且具有患者创伤小、康复快和术后住院时间短等优点。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝补片修补的相关问题

腹部切口疝一直是外科剖腹手术后常见的并发症，在剖腹手术后的发生率为3％～13％，感染性伤口的切口疝发生率。切口疝早期的手术方法是行单纯缝合，术后复发率为20％～52％，复发率高的主要原因是修补后张力高。随后出现了人工编织物的无张力修补．术后复发率降至11％左右。但是由于要分离出一个容纳补片的间隙，所以必须对腹壁组织进行较大的解剖和分离．这就造成了大面积的腹壁组织损伤，也造成了术后病人比较剧烈的疼痛．     

无张力疝修补术后补片感染12例

目的 探讨疝补片感染的发病原因、预防和治疗.方法 回顾性总结分析2000年5月至2008年5月陕西省人民医院收治的12例使用无张力疝修补手术后发生补片感染病例的临床资料.其中筋膜前(或腹膜前)肌下置入补片8例,补片置入在筋膜缺损缘间2例.疝环填充式无张力疝修补术1例,平片修补术1例.单纯聚丙稀补片7例;聚丙稀与聚四氟乙烯双面复合材料4例;聚四氟乙烯材料1例.根据感染的程度、材料不同采用相应的治疗方法.8例全部去除补片;2例部分去除补片;2例仅开放换药.去除补片后3例给予一期缝合,封闭式引流.结果 全组患者均治愈出院,无围手术期死亡,手术过程中无大出血和膀胱损伤.手术后无疼痛和尿潴留及其他并发症.换药时间7 d至6个月,中位时间2周,选择性使用抗生素3～7 d,平均4.5 d,随访时间18～78个月,平均38.5个月,未见感染,部分或完全取出补片的患者未见疝复发.结论 预防感染的发生最为重要,治疗方法应个体化,根据不同的手术类型和材料选择不同的治疗措施.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝补片修补术的初步经验

目的:探讨腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的手术方法、安全性等问题。方法:对我院2004年3月～11月间收治的25例腹壁切口疝病人,进行腹腔镜下修补术。结果:24例(96%)手术成功,1例(4%)因腹腔内广泛粘连而中转为剖腹修补。平均手术时间为110min,平均术后住院6d,6例(24%)病人术中发现有一个以上的隐匿性缺损。术后并发症有:术后短期内修补区腹壁明显疼痛21例(84%),腹壁缝合点较长时间疼痛6例(24%),浆液肿3例(12%);无修补区感染,也未发现早期复发的病例。结论:对腹壁切口疝,多数病人是可以经腹腔镜进行粘连松解及补片修补术的,还可在术中发现其他隐性缺损。对腹腔内广泛粘连而影响操作器械的进入及分离者,应及时中转剖腹手术。     

腹腔镜下腹壁疝腹膜外补片修补术与腹腔内补片修补术比较的多中心回顾性研究

背景与目的 腹壁疝修补术是最常见的外科手术之一,全球每年有200万例左右的腹壁疝患者接受手术治疗。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术优势明显。然而腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术（IPOM）与腹腔镜下腹膜外补片修补术（ESR）这两种腔镜术式的优缺点及疗效如何,尚无大样本的临床研究证实。因此,本研究通过比较ESR与IPOM两种手术方式治疗腹壁疝的近远期疗效,为临床提供循证参考。方法 回顾性分析2017年1月1日—2022年12月31日湖南省11家医疗机构收治的157例行腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术患者的临床资料,其中124例行ESR（ESR组）,33例行IPOM（IPOM组）,对比分析两组病例的临床特点、手术方式和术后近远期效果。结果 全组无中转开腹病例或围术期死亡病例。两组病例的年龄、性别、BMI、类型差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。两组病例疝环横径、手术时间、术中出血量、疝环闭合概率差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。网片固定方式ESR组以自固定和缝线固定为主（91.1%）,而IPOM组以钉枪固定为主（69.7%）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。ESR组的术后疼痛评分明显低于IPOM组（2.4±0.8 vs. 2.8±1.0,P<0.05）,住院费用明显低于IPOM组（21 001元vs. 38 437元,P<0.05）。两组的术后住院时间和近期并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。中位随访10.3个月,ESR组无复发病例,IPOM组2例复发（6.1%）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 ESR是湖南地区腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补的主流术式之一。由于固定方式和网片选择的不同,ESR较之IPOM而言,术后疼痛更轻微、费用更低、复发率更低,且并不明显增加手术时间和术后近期并发症。     

腹腔镜下切口疝补片修补并乙状结肠造瘘还纳术三例

目的外伤或医源性损伤造成的直肠或乙状结肠穿孔需急诊行乙状结肠造瘘手术,而术后常出现切口感染直至后期的切口疝,探讨如何以最小的创伤同时处理切口疝并还纳造瘘口。 方法2012年1月至2016年7月鞍钢集团总医院收治了3例腹壁切口疝并需还纳乙状结肠造瘘口患者,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。 结果3例患者均成功完成腹腔镜下操作,无中转,手术时间150～210 min,平均170 min;术中出血量20～70 ml,术后8～10 d后出院,腹壁造瘘处切口及Trocar孔均一期愈合,无吻合口漏、腹腔感染、血清肿等并发症发生。出院后随访6～48个月,无肠漏、再手术取出补片、疝复发等并发症出现。 结论对于乙状结肠造瘘口还纳加疝修补是可行的,但需做到科学的选择补片,精细的术中操作,严密的围手术期管理。     

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Background Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery have made various abdominal surgeries possible. To avoid wound infection, mesh repair of abdominal incisional hernias is performed laparoscopically. Here we present a new procedure to fix mesh to the abdominal wall. Surgical technique Four anchoring sutures are made using a suture-grasping device; the additional transabdominal sutures are then made with a modified double-needle device. Additional circumferential fixation with tacks is not necessary. Conclusions This new mesh fixation method involves simple suturing techniques and is less time consuming than the conventional procedure.     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia

BACKGROUND: In this long-term retrospective study, a laparoscopic technique was used for incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, we performed laparoscopic repairs with prosthetic mesh in 159 patients suffering from incisional hernia. Morbidity factors were noted and operative data were collected. In addition, early and long-term complications and recurrences were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no deaths as a result of the procedure. In 21 patients (13.8%), the operation was converted to an open procedure. Small bowel perforation occurred in three patients (1.9%). Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days. Early complications occurred in 61 patients (44%). The mean follow-up time was 49 months. There were no infections of the prosthetic mesh. Residual abdominal pain was reported in 31 patients (26%). Bowel obstructions requiring resection were found in two patients (1%), and hernia recurrence was observed in 19 patients (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic herniorraphy is a promising technique with all the advantages of minimal-invasive surgery. Nevertheless, close attention needs to be paid to the choice of the hernia and mesh size and to the fixing of the mesh.     

Laparoscopic incisional lumbar hernia repair

Purpose  Incisional lumbar hernia is an uncommon hernia type. Open surgical procedures have significant postoperative morbidity and patient dissatisfaction, therefore, for the repair of seven incisional lumbar hernias, we attempted using an intraperitoneal laparoscopic technique that was described to have good short-term results and decreased morbidity. Methods  We applied a laparoscopic technique using polypropylene meshes in five patients and composite meshes in two patients to cover the defect, then placed prolene sutures and hernia staples to secure the mesh intraperitoneally. Result  The technique was successful in all patients, and they tolerated the procedure well. All did well after surgery, ambulating and eating a regular diet on postoperative day 1. No postoperative complications developed. At a mean follow-up of 34.1 months (range 17–43 months) none of them had pain, mass, or evidence of recurrence, and furthermore, cosmesis was excellent. Conclusions  We believe that the laparoscopic approach is feasible, safe, and the least invasive choice for repairing difficult hernias such as incisional lumbar hernias.     

Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia

Background : Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias was first reported in 1993. Since then, there have been sporadic case reports and small series published about this procedure, but it has not been widely adopted. Newer types of composite prosthetic mesh may reduce the potential problem of bowel adhesion. Methods : Thirty cases of laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repairs (carried out by two surgeons or their senior registrars) have been retrospectively reviewed and reported in this article. The data were obtained from patient records and subsequent phone surveys. Results : Thirty patients between 29 and 82 years (mean: 58 years) underwent this procedure. There were 14 men and 16 women. The average weight of the patients was 81 kg. The hernias were up to 6 or 7 cm in diameter. Mesh was used in 28 cases (polypropylene in 25 cases, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in two cases and composite mesh in one case). Most meshes were laid intraperitoneally and fixed into position with laparoscopic spiral tacks. Twenty‐nine cases were completed laparoscopically. One operation (3.3%) was converted to an open procedure because of severe bowel adherence to the hernia sac. The mean operating time was 52 min for laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repairs only. All but two patients tolerated an oral diet within 24 h. The postoperative hospital stay ranged from 0 to 11 days, with 17 patients (57%) staying overnight and eight patients (27%) staying another day. Over 80% of the patients returned to house duties within a week. There was no mortality, and minor complications occurred in four patients (14%). One patient had a small bowel obstruction treated successfully by repeat laparoscopy with division of fibrinous adhesions to polypropylene mesh on day four. Follow up ranged from 1 to 69 months (mean: 12 months). One patient did not attend follow‐up appointments. There were three cases of hernia recurrence (10%). Conclusion : The results suggest that laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias is a safe, effective and technically feasible operation for small‐ to medium‐sized hernias allowing shorter hospital stay, early recovery and resumption of normal activities. However, recurrence rates are comparable to open mesh hernioplasty especially for larger hernias.     

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

Background Incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery, and it is often a source of morbidity and high costs for health care. This is a case-control study to compare laparoscopic versus anterior-open incisional hernia repair. Methods 170 patients with incisional hernia were enrolled in this study between September 2001 and December 2004. Of these, 85 underwent anterior-open repair (open group: OG), and 85 underwent laparoscopic repair (laparoscopic group: LG). The clinical outcome was determined by a median follow-up of 24.0 months for LG and OG. Results No difference was noticed between the two groups in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), and incisional hernia diameter. Mean operative time was 61.0 min for LG patients and 150.9 min for OG patients (p < .05). Mean hospitalization was 2.7 days for LG patients and 9.9 days for OG patients (p < .05). Mean return to work was 13 days (range, 6–15 days) in LG patients and 25 days (range, 16–30 days) in OG patients. Complications occurred in 16.4 % of LG patients and 29.4 % of OG patients, with a relapse rate of 2.3% in LG and 1.1% in OG patients. Conclusions Short-term results indicate that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is associated with a shorter operative time and hospitalization, a faster return to work, and a lower incidence of wound infections and major complications compared to the anterior-open procedure. Further studies and longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.     

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: To analyze hospital resource utilization for laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair including the postoperative period. METHODS: Prospectively collected administrative data for incisional hernia repairs were examined. A total of 884 incisional hernia repairs were examined for trends in type of approach over time. Starting October 2001, detailed records were available, and examined for operating room (OR) time, cost data, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day postoperative hospital encounters. RESULTS: Of the total, 469 incisional hernias were approached laparoscopically (53%) and 415 open (47%). Laparoscopic repair had shorter LOS (1 +/- 0.2 days vs 2 +/- 0.6 days), longer OR time (149 +/- 4 min vs 89 +/- 4 min), higher supply costs (2,237 dollars +/- 71 dollars vs 664 dollars +/- 113 dollars), slightly lower total hospital cost (6,396 dollars +/- 477 dollars vs 7,197 dollars +/- 1,819 dollars), and slightly more postoperative hospital encounters (15% vs 13%). Use of laparoscopy increased over time (37% in 2000 vs 68% in 2004). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is becoming increasingly popular, and not at increased cost to the health care system.     

应用补片修补腹壁切口疝40例临床分析

目的总结补片修补腹壁切口疝的临床经验。方法对我院2003年2月至2007年8月收治的40例腹壁切口疝临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组全部使用补片行切口疝修补术。术后患者无严重并发症，均痊愈出院。38例获得随访，均无复发。结论补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法。