A cost comparison of medical management and transurethral needle ablation for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during a 5-year period

PURPOSE: We performed an analysis comparing the cost of medical management with TUNA therapy for a 5-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Published costs for tamsulosin, finasteride, transurethral needle ablation (TUNA, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) and transurethral resection of the prostate were used to construct a cost analysis model comparing medication with TUNA. The model analyzed monotherapy with an alpha-blocker (tamsulosin) and a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor (finasteride), combination therapy using both medications, and a mixed scenario using monotherapy and combination therapy. Published data were used to estimate the rate of surgical intervention in patients initially treated with medications or TUNA. RESULTS: Tamsulosin monotherapy was less expensive than TUNA for 5 years ($3,485 for tamsulosin vs $4,811 for TUNA year 5). Finasteride monotherapy reaches a break-even point with TUNA during year 5 ($4,867 for finasteride vs $4,811 for TUNA). Combination therapy reaches a break-even point with TUNA after approximately 2 years 7 months of treatment ($4,515 for combination therapy vs $4,572 for TUNA) and the mixed scenario breaks even with TUNA at approximately year 4 ($4,696 for medical management vs $4,645 for TUNA). CONCLUSIONS: The TUNA procedure compares favorably to combination medical therapy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on a cost basis. alpha-Blocker monotherapy is less costly than TUNA while 5alpha-reductase inhibitor monotherapy is approximately equivalent to TUNA for 5 years. The TUNA procedure is less expensive than combination medical management for 5 years, with a break-even point at approximately 2 years 7 months.     

A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the short- and long-term effectiveness of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate for clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), using a meta-analysis of all clinical studies involving TUNA. METHODS: Data were extracted from two randomized trials, two non-randomized observational protocols and 10 single-arm studies conducted on TUNA, according to a determined protocol. The meta-analysis was based on the change in the mean score at the end of study from that at baseline. The estimation of the effects from the meta-analysis used a multilevel model including random effects for the studies. RESULTS: In all studies the patients recruited had severe lower urinary tract symptoms and a mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of > 20 before treatment. The effect of TUNA was to halve the mean IPSS at 1 year after treatment and, although there was a slight tendency for the IPSS to increase in all arms from year 1 to year 5, this decrease by half was maintained at 5 years. The maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) also increased by approximately 70% from baseline to 1 year and in virtually all studies the mean Q(max) approached or exceeded 15 mL/s. Although there was a tendency for Q(max) to decline slightly over time, the mean Q(max) 5 years after treatment was > 50% over baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that TUNA is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for men with clinical BPH, even when the symptoms are severe. There is a significant improvement in symptoms and flow rate after 1 year which persists for at least 5 years. TUNA therapy would appear to be an alternative to surgery and an attractive option for men who do not wish to undergo long-term medical therapy, are poor candidates for surgery or are concerned about the side-effects of TURP.     

Symptom analysis and uroflowmetry 7 years after transurethral resection of the prostate

The long-term result after transurethral resection of the prostate is not well documented. From 1981 to 1983, 84 consecutive consenting patients completed detailed symptom analysis and urodynamic examination before transurethral resection of the prostate. These studies were repeated 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Of the 84 patients 44 were interviewed at 86 months: 75% reported improvement compared to preoperative symptoms. In addition, 23 patients underwent uroflowmetry at 7 years. For this group the maximum urine flow rate remained virtually unchanged from 1 to 7 years postoperatively). When uroflowmetry results from all patients undergoing testing at the various followup intervals are considered, the maximum urine flow rate was 9.5 ml. per second preoperatively, 17.0 ml. per second at 3 months and 19.6 ml. per second at 1 year. Of the 44 patients 7 (16%) underwent repeat transurethral resection of the prostate.     

Randomized clinical trial comparing transurethral needle ablation with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results at 18 months

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) during an 18-months follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 59 patients older than 40 years were included in this study. The entry criteria were prostate size <70 g, maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) <15 mL/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >13, and no suspicion of prostate cancer according to the clinical or laboratory findings. Of the patients, 26 (44%) were treated with TUNA and 33 (56%) with TURP. At 3 and 18 months of follow-up, Q(max), postvoiding residual volume (PVR), IPSS, and the quality of life (QOL) score were compared with the baseline values. The results were also compared in patients undergoing TUNA v TURP. RESULTS: Improvements in Q(max), PVR, IPSS, and QOL score were statistically significant for both groups at 3 and 18 months of follow-up. The increase in the mean Q(max) of the TURP group was higher than that in the TUNA group, whereas no significant differences were found in the two groups regarding improvements in IPSS and QOL score. There were no complications associated with the TUNA procedure, while 16 retrograde ejaculation, 4 erectile impairment, 2 urethral stenosis, and 1 urinary incontinence cases were observed after TURP. CONCLUSIONS: The TUNA procedure is an effective and safe minimally invasive treatment with negligible adverse effect for selected patients with symptomatic BPH compared with TURP. It should be considered as an alternative treatment option for younger patients who want to preserve sexual function.     

Two-year results of transurethral resection of the prostate versus four 'less invasive' treatment options

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) versus four less invasive treatment options during a 2-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 95 elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were assigned prospectively to the following five treatment arms; transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; n = 28), transurethral electrovaporization (TUVP; n = 17), visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP; n = 17), transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU; n = 20) and transurethral needle ablation (TUNA); n = 15). Preoperative workup included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, post-void residual volume (PVR), prostate volume determined by transrectal ultrasonography and a multichannel pressure flow study. Postoperative follow-up at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months included assessment of IPSS, PVR and uroflowmetry. RESULTS: At study entry, patients assigned to one of the five treatment arms were comparable with respect to age, peak flow rate (Q(max)), IPSS, prostate size and the degree of bladder outflow obstruction. During study, 1 patient in the TURP group (4%) required a secondary TURP, as compared to 23.5% (n = 4) after TUVP, 26.7% (n = 4) after VLAP, 15% (n = 4) after HIFU and 20% (n = 3) following TUNA. In patients not subjected to a secondary procedure, the IPSS decreased a mean 13. 9 after TURP, as compared to 12.7 after TUVP, 12.9 after VLAP, 7.0 after HIFU, and 9.8 after TUNA. Q(max) increased 11.5 ml/s (mean) after TURP, as compared to 11.1 ml/s after TUVP, 5.6 ml/s after VLAP, 2.5 ml/s after HIFU and 2.3 ml/s after TUNA. CONCLUSION: In up to a quarter of the patients, a secondary TURP is performed within the first 2 years after 'less invasive' procedures. These data underline the need for long-term studies to reliably assess the role of less invasive procedures and to indicate that TURP is still competitive.     

Efficacy of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as one institute participating in a Japanese clinical trial. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with symptomatic BPH were treated with the TUNA procedure in our institute. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) score, residual urine volume (RV), prostate volume (PV) and peak urinary flow rates (Qmax) were measured and complications were assessed. RESULTS: We followed and evaluated 30 of the 33 cases. At 12 months there were significant improvements in the IPSS (20.7 to 11.2, P < 0.0001), QOL score (4.9 to 2.1, P < 0.0001), RV (46.6 to 22.6 mL, P < 0.01), PV (37.8 to 30.0 mL3, P < 0.002) and Qmax (8.00 to 11.0 mL/s, P < 0.002). There were no serious complications. CONCLUSION: This trial shows that the TUNA procedure is a safe and efficacious treatment for symptomatic BPH.     

The impact of minimally invasive surgeries for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia on male sexual function： a systematic review

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies was conducted to evaluate data for the effects of minimally invasive procedures for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） on male sexual function. The studies searched were trials that enrolled men with symptomatic BPH who were treated with laser surgeries, transurethral microwave therapy （TUMT）, transurethral needle ablation of the prostate （TUNA）, transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate （TEAP） and high-intensity frequency ultrasound （HIFU）, in comparison with traditional transurethral resection of the prostate （TURP） or sham operations. A total of 72 studies were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 33 studies, 21 were concerned with laser surgeries, six with TUMT, four with TUNA and two with TEAP containing information regarding male sexual function. No study is available regarding the effect of HIFU for BPH on male sexual function. Our analysis shows that minimally invasive surgeries for BPH have comparable effects to those of TURP on male erectile function. Collectively, less than 15.4% or 15.2% of patients will have either decrease or increase, respectively, of erectile function after laser procedures, TUMT and TUNA. As observed with TURP, a high incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction （EjD） is common after treatment of BPH with holmium, potassium-titanyl-phosphate and thulium laser therapies （〉 33.6%）. TUMT, TUNA and neodymium：yttrium aluminum garnet visual laser ablation or interstitial laser coagulation for BPH has less incidence of EjD, but these procedures are considered less effective for BPH treatment when compared with TURP.     

The effect of transurethral needle ablation on symptoms of chronic pelvic pain syndrome--a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effects of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) in chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: CPPS patients were subjected to TUNA (n = 21) or sham therapy (urethrocystoscopy) (n = 6). Digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound were performed. Prostate-specific antigen and urine were analysed before and 1 month after treatment. Symptoms, the DAN-PSS-1 questionnaire, urine flow, residual urine volume, medication and a subjective estimation of the effect of treatment were evaluated during a follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: In both groups the maximal urine flow increased and the DAN-PSS-1 score decreased, but the decrease in the DAN-PSS-1 score was significant (p = 0.002) only in the TUNA group. The total symptom score decreased from 14 to 8.3 points in the TUNA group, and from 12.6 to 8.0 points in sham patients. TUNA relieved pain significantly. In the TUNA group symptoms were ameliorated in patients with small (< or = 20 ml; p = 0.002) and large prostates (> 20 ml; p = 0.04). Similarly, patients with both mild (p = 0.004) and severe (p = 0.02) symptoms at baseline benefitted from TUNA. Of the TUNA patients, 72% felt better at 1-year follow-up, although 57% still had symptoms and 38% needed medication. The figures in the sham group were 50%, 66% and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TUNA relieved symptoms in CPPS patients for at least 12 months. The need for medication and the presence of symptoms were reduced, and the fraction of patients satisfied with treatment was higher in the TUNA group than in the sham group. However, these differences between the groups were not statistically significant. To assess the clinical value of TUNA in CPPS a prospective double-blind study with a large number of patients is needed to confirm the results of this pilot study.     

Chemo-ablation of the prostate with dehydrated alcohol for the treatment of prostatic obstruction

PURPOSE: We confirmed clinically whether chemo-ablation of the prostate with absolute ethanol may be an innovative transurethral approach for the relief of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: Using the InjecTx endoscopic device (Injectx Inc., San Jose, California) an initial cohort of 15 patients, including 13 who have now been followed more than 1 year, underwent elective transurethral chemo-ablation of the prostate. RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative comparisons of the American Urological Association symptom score, maximum urine flow rate and prostatic volume reveal significant improvement with minimal discomfort and no major complication. CONCLUSIONS: The InjecTx technique proved encouragingly successful in this initial small-scale clinical trial.     

Unequal use of new technologies by race: the use of new prostate surgeries (transurethral needle ablation, transurethral microwave therapy and laser) among elderly Medicare beneficiaries

PURPOSE: We compared the availability and use of transurethral microwave therapy, transurethral needle ablation, contact or noncontact laser therapy and transurethral resection of the prostate among elderly black and white Medicare beneficiaries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 100% Medicare Inpatient, Outpatient, Carrier and Denominator files of men 65 years old or older who underwent these procedures in 1999 through 2001. White-to-black race rate ratios for each procedure were computed for the entire United States, as well as for a restricted set of counties in which procedures were available to black beneficiaries. RESULTS: A total of 170,067 TURP, 16,953 TUMT, 5,353 TUNA and 12,134 Laser procedures were performed during 3 years. Nationally there was only a 3% difference in the age adjusted TURP rates between white and black men (6.13 and 5.94 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). However, the age adjusted rates for TUMT and TUNA among white men were about twice those among black men (0.63 vs 0.31 and 0.20 vs 0.10 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). Laser rates were 17% higher among white men than among black men (0.44 vs 0.38 per 1,000 person-years). Large geographic variation existed in the new procedure rates. Negative binomial regression analysis confirmed the national findings in those counties in which the procedures were available to black men. Adjusted white-to-black rate ratios were 1.96 (95% CI 1.70-2.25) for TUMT, 2.33 (95% CI 1.87-2.90) for TUNA and 1.36 (95% CI 1.16-1.59) for Laser. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for availability, elderly black Medicare beneficiaries were less likely to undergo the new BPH procedures than white beneficiaries, while the usage difference for TURP remained small.     

Transurethral needle ablation for chronic nonbacterial prostatitis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate for treating chronic nonbacterial prostatitis unresponsive to conservative therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (mean age 38.5 years, range 25-52) with nonbacterial prostatitis in whom clinical management was unsuccessful in relieving the symptoms or signs of prostatitis were treated using TUNA. All patients had a high leukocyte count (> 15 per high-power field) in expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) with no bacterial growth in either urine or prostatic secretion cultures. Before TUNA all patients were evaluated using a symptom score, satisfaction score (quality of life) and an examination of prostatic secretions. All patients were reassessed using the same variables 1 and 3 months after TUNA. Of the 42 patients, 10 had their semen analysed before and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The mean (sd) symptom and satisfaction scores improved significantly, from 11.02 (2.90) to 5.00 (2.61) and from 4.84 (0.57) to 1.26 (1.18), respectively, 3 months after TUNA (both P < 0.05). Of the 42 patients, 30 (71%) had normal EPS results within 3 months of TUNA. Also, of 37 patients with high leukocyte counts (> 100 per high-power field) before TUNA, 26 (70%) had normal EPS results within 3 months afterward, and 29 (78%) had a satisfaction score of < 3 points. CONCLUSIONS: TUNA may be a possible treatment option for patients with chronic nonbacterial prostatitis that is unresponsive to conservative therapies. A long-term follow-up and randomized studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of the TUNA against intractable chronic prostatitis.     

Transurethral needle ablation for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcome after 1 year

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to evaluate short-term effects on lower urinary tract symptoms and uroflowmetry and assess side effects of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six men with a median age 68 years (range 53-77 years) were evaluated with symptom scores and voiding parameters before and at 3 and 12 months after TUNA. All treatments were performed in the outpatient department using topical anesthesia supplemented with sedoanalgesia. RESULTS: The International Prostate Symptom Score had decreased from 21.2 to 10.5 at 12 months postoperatively. Peak urinary flow was 10.9 mL/sec at baseline and was elevated to 13.7 mL/sec after 12 months. Residual urine volumes were unchanged. Postoperative urinary retention developed in 71% of the patients and had a mean duration of 6.3 (range 1-34) days. Postoperative perineal pain was noted by about half of the patients for the first 1 to 2 weeks. Painkillers were frequently used to reduce postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral needle ablation is a safe procedure suitable for the outpatient clinic. After short-term follow-up, statistically and clinically significant effects were observed on symptoms and uroflow. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to define the future role of this therapy.     

Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate

PURPOSE: We reviewed outcomes for men with a history of transurethral prostate resection who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 26, 1998 and December 2006, 3,061 men underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our institution. A retrospective review showed that 119 had a history of transurethral prostate resection. These men were compared to randomized matched controls with regard to operative and postoperative outcomes. The matching criteria used to randomly select patients were clinical stage, preoperative prostate specific antigen and biopsy Gleason score. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD age in the groups with and without transurethral prostate resection was 66.2 +/- 5.6 and 60.7 +/- 7.0 years, respectively (p <0.01). Mean estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, pathological prostate volume and reoperation rate were statistically similar between the groups. Mean length of stay for the groups with and without transurethral prostate resection was 6.5 +/- 3.0 and 5.29 +/- 2.3 days, respectively (p <0.01). Mean operative time for the groups with and without transurethral prostate resection was 179 +/- 44 and 171 +/- 38 minutes, respectively (p = 0.02). Positive margins were seen in 21.8% and 12.6% of the patients with and without transurethral prostate resection, respectively (p = 0.02). A total of 64 complications were seen in patients with a history of transurethral prostate resection compared to 34 in those without such a history (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We report that patients with a history of transurethral prostate resection who undergo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy have worse outcomes with respect to operative time, length of stay, positive margin rate and overall complication rate. This subset of patients should be made aware of these potential risks before undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.     

Long-term evaluation of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA) for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical outcome up to five years from three centers

OBJECTIVE: TUNA has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective therapy for BPH. However the major criticism, as with all alternative treatments for BPH, was the lack of long-term data. We present the clinical outcome of patients treated by TUNA and followed for 5 years. METHODS: 188 consecutive patients with symptomatic BPH treated with TUNA were followed for five years in three different centers. All patients were treated using the TUNA II or TUNA III catheters under local anesthesia only without general or spinal anesthesia. Baseline and 5-year follow-up evaluation included urinary peak flow, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and post-void residual urine (PVR). The number of patients requiring additional medical or surgical treatment was recorded. Statistics were performed using the t-test. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 63 months, mean urinary peak flow rate increased from 8.6 ml/s to 12.1 ml/s (p<0.01, t-test), IPSS and PVR decreased from 20.9 and 179 ml to 8.7 and 122 ml, respectively (both p<0.001, t-test). The percentage of patients who improved by at least 50% their peak uroflow and IPSS was 24% and 78% respectively. Mean prostate volume and PSA levels did not change significantly (53.9 cc vs. 53.8 cc and 3.3 vs. 3.6 ng/ml, respectively at 5 years, both p values > 0.05, t-test). Two patients died of unrelated comorbidities and 10 were lost for follow-up. Medical treatment was given to 12 patients (6.4%), a second TUNA performed in 7 patients (3.7%) and surgery indicated in 22/186 (11.1%). Overall 41/176 patients (188 at start, 2 deaths and 10 lost to follow-up) or 23.3% required additional treatment at 5 years follow-up following the original TUNA procedure. CONCLUSIONS: TUNA is effective and provides good long-term clinical improvement at 5-year follow-up. TUNA treatment stands the test of time at 5-year follow-up with low and acceptable failure rates. More than 75% of the patients do not need additional treatment for BPH on the long run.     

Characterizing TUNA ablative treatments of the prostate for benign hyperplasia with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transurethral Needle Ablation of the prostate TUNA has been accepted as an office-based treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for many years. Clinical outcomes have been reported, but the amount and location of the necrosis produced have yet to be characterized. The necrosis caused by TUNA was evaluated by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with BPH/lower urinary-tract symptoms underwent standard TUNA, and MRI scans with gadolinium enhancement were performed before and 1 week after treatment. The images were studied using Analyze software to quantify the amount of necrosis compared with the prostatic volume. Transverse, coronal, and sagittal images were obtained to identify the location of the necrosis. RESULTS: New gadolinium defects were seen in all patients after TUNA. The lesions coalesced into continuous areas of necrosis and correlated with the site of needle placement. The mean volume of necrosis was 6.84 cc and equated to 8.6% of the prostate volume. No lesions were found near the apex, urethra, or rectum; and none extended beyond the prostate capsule. CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI demonstrates new vascular defects representing necrosis caused by TUNA of the prostate. This therapy for BPH produces necrotic lesions that can be placed strategically by the surgeon. The standard protocol produces lesions that coalesce to create larger lesions. This MRI study has characterized, for the first time, the heating pattern and intraprostatic necrosis of a complete TUNA procedure.     

How do transurethral needle ablation of the prostate and transurethral microwave thermotherapy compare with transurethral prostatectomy?

Throughout the past decade, several minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have emerged to challenge transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) in efficacy and safety. This review compares high- and lowenergy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) and transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate with TURP in clinical efficacy and safety. In reducing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms, TUNA and TUMT are, at best, equal to TURP. However, the effects of TUMT and TUNA on objective measures of obstructive uropathy are minimal and less durable compared with TURP. The sole determinant of when and how to treat a patient with BPH is not solely a therapy’s clinical effectiveness. Other multiple factors must be considered, including safety, adverse effects, sexual function, and cost. The role of TUNA and TUMT lies in offering a cost-effective alternative for achieving substantial improvement in quality of life at an acceptable risk level for treatment-associated complications.     

Therapeutic effect of transurethral needle ablation in non-bacterial prostatitis: Chronic pelvic pain syndrome type IIIa

AIM: Non-bacterial prostatitis is difficult to manage with conventional treatment. This study was undertaken to evaluate the therapeutic effect of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) on men with chronic inflammatory non-bacterial prostatitis. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with non-bacterial prostatitis (type IIIa) were treated with TUNA. The TUNA procedure, which uses radiofrequency energy, heats the prostate tissue to approximately 90-110 degrees C over a 5-min period. Evaluation consisted of a prostatitis symptom severity score chart, the monitoring of the leukocyte count in the expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) and a subjective global assessment. RESULTS: The decrease in the prostate symptom severity score chart at 3 and 6 months compared with the baseline assessment was statistically significant. Analysis of the leukocyte levels in the EPS in 14 patients was available. All 14 patients had a decrease in the EPS leukocyte count 3 months after treatment. However, six of these men (43%) still had EPS leukocyte levels above the normal indices (>10 white blood cells per high-power field). A second session of TUNA on these partial responders resulted in three of the six men obtaining a normal EPS leukocyte count. At 6 months following treatment, complete, partial and poor improvement in terms of subjective global assessment were noted in 60, 35 and 5% of patients, respectively. No major complications, including those of sexual dysfunction or retrograde ejaculation, were noted in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral needle ablation appears to be an easy, safe and effective treatment for men with chronic inflammatory non-bacterial prostatitis.     

经尿道等离子束切割前列腺治疗良性前列腺增生(附712例报告)

目的:探讨经尿道等离子束切割前列腺治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性与有效性。方法:应用经尿道等离子束治疗良性前列腺增生712例,平均年龄70.6岁,平均前列腺质量52 g;术前、术后行尿流率、残余尿量测定、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)及生活质量评分(QOL)并予以比较。结果:本组病例712例,平均年龄70.6岁,手术时间20～120 m in,平均51 m in。切割前列腺组织15～96 g,平均46 g。无电切综合征发生。术后随访1～52个月,平均27.6个月,最大尿流率(Qm ax)由术前的4.7上升至19.1 m l/s;IPSS由术前的26.6分下降至5.8分;QOL评分由术前的5.4分下降至1.7分,3项指标手术前后比较均有显著性差别(P均<0.01)。结论:经尿道等离子束切割前列腺治疗良性前列腺增生是一种安全、有效的手术方式。     

CATHETER-FREE ENDOSCOPIC LASER ABLATION OF THE PROSTATE USING A 1-SIZE PROSTATIC STENT

Purpose

Endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate is a safe alternative to transurethral prostatic resection. Recognized disadvantages include prolonged catheterization, postoperative discomfort and delayed symptomatic improvement. We assessed the role of a 1-size temporary prostatic stent in men undergoing endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate.

Materials and Methods

A total of 55 men a mean of 73 years old with outflow obstruction, including 9 who presented in urinary retention, underwent endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate and temporary stenting. Urinary flow rate, residual urine volume, symptom score and prostate specific antigen were measured preoperatively, and 6 weeks (with the stent in situ), 3 months (after stent removal) and 12 months postoperatively. Duration of hospital stay and complications were also recorded.

Results

Of the 55 men 37 (67%) voided immediately with the stent in situ, including 7 of the 9 in retention. At 6 weeks with the stent in place mean maximum urine flow was 17.3 ml. per second (preoperatively 8.7). Dysuria was reported by 3 patients. Stent related complications were rare. One stent migrated early, resulting in urinary retention, while 2 that migrated late were asymptomatic. No patient had acute urinary retention after stent removal. Maximum urinary flow rate measured at 6 weeks with the stent in situ was similar to that 1 year after endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate.

Conclusions

The use of a 1-size, inexpensive plastic prostatic stent enabled catheter-free endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate in 67% of our patients. Early improvements in the urinary flow rate and a lower incidence of dysuria were additional benefits. The result of endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate at 1 year was comparable to that of transurethral prostatic resection.