Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Incomplete reversal of pancuronium neuromuscular blockade by neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium

Three clinically used anticholinesterases--neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium--were tested for their ability to reverse two levels (60% and 95%) of neuromuscular blockade produced by pancuronium. A controlled in vitro environment of the rat diaphragm-phrenic nerve system was used for the studies. Concentrations of anticholinesterases spanned the clinical range and were extended beyond to establish dose-response curves. Neostigmine was the most potent reversal drug (ED50 for 95% block 5.5 +/- 4 nM), followed by pyridostigmine (0.27 +/- 0.06 microM) and edrophonium (2.1 +/- 0.05 microM). The three drugs were equally effective at reversal of block and fade as measured by train-of-four stimulation. The dose-response curves for all three drugs showed a ceiling effect for reversal of tension and fade. Supraclinical concentrations of drug did not effect complete reversal, especially at 95% block. High concentrations of anticholinesterase led to randomly appearing hyperactivity manifested by spontaneous twitching and repetitive firing with severe fade on stimulation.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of pancuronium

Dose response curves were constructed for edrophonium and neostigmine when used to antagonise pancuronium, 0.07 mg/kg during thiopentone-nitrous oxide-halothane anaesthesia. The antagonist was given when 10% twitch height had been restored and the effect was measured 10 minutes later. Recoveries to 50% and 90% twitch height were achieved with 167 and 828 micrograms/kg of edrophonium, and 10.5 and 51 micrograms/kg of neostigmine. The dose response curves were parallel and neostigmine was 16 times more potent than edrophonium. Combinations of equipotent doses of edrophonium and neostigmine were also administered and produced additive but not synergistic effects. It is concluded that either edrophonium or neostigmine may be used for the reversal of pancuronium neuromuscular blockade, but the combination of the two offers no advantage.     

Dose-response curves for edrophonium, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine after pancuronium and d-tubocurarine

To determine the potencies of neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium in reversing pancuronium and d-tubocurarine blockade, dose-response curves were established for first twitch height recovery and train-of-four ratio. One hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received either 0.06 mg/kg pancuronium or 0.36 mg/kg d-tubocurarine during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When first twitch height had recovered spontaneously to 10% of its initial value, neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg/kg) was injected by random allocation. Recovery was measured 10 min after the injection of the antagonist. First twitch ED50's were 0.013, 0.085, and 0.17 mg/kg after pancuronium, and 0.017, 0.11, and 0.27 mg/kg after d-tubocurarine, for neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium, respectively. The ED50 for pyridostigmine and edrophonium obtained after d-tubocurarine was significantly larger (P less than 0.05) than that after pancuronium. The train-of-four dose-response curves were significantly flatter for edrophonium than for the other two agents, indicating a greater ability of edrophonium to antagonize fade at low doses. It is concluded that the potency of reversal agents may be different for different relaxants, and that potency ratios might depend upon the end-point chosen as full neuromuscular recovery.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Twitch depression and train-of-four ratio after antagonism of pancuronium with edrophonium, neostigmine, or pyridostigmine

During N2O-O2-halothane anesthesia pancuronium (3 mg/70 kg) was antagonized with neostigmine (2.5 or 5 mg/70 kg), pyridostigmine (10 or 20 mg/70 kg), or edrophonium (50 or 100 mg/70 kg) in 36 human subjects (6 in each group). Reversal was attempted at 10% spontaneous recovery of muscle twitch, which was measured using train-of-four stimulation. When first twitch tension was less than 70% of the control it was found that for the same tension, the train-of-four ratio was greater with edrophonium than with neostigmine, and greater with neostigmine than with pyridostigmine. It was concluded that the three antagonists have different mechanisms of action. In comparison with neostigmine, edrophonium is more and pyridostigmine is less effective at presynaptic (or fade) receptors.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of moderate and profound atracurium blockade

To measure the ability of neostigmine and edrophonium to reverse moderate and profound atracurium blockade, dose-response relationships were established for these reversal agents given at 1% and 10% twitch height recovery. Eighty-five ASA I and II adult patients received atracurium, 0.4 mg/kg, during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 seconds, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Edrophonium, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg; neostigmine, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg; or no reversal agent was given when there was either 1% or 10% recovery of the first twitch response. With profound blockade, the slope of the edrophonium dose-response relationship was significantly flatter (P less than 0.05) than that of neostigmine. The dose of neostigmine required to achieve 80% first twitch recovery (ED80) after 10 minutes was 0.013 +/- 0.003 mg/kg (mean +/- SEM) if given at 10% recovery, and 0.032 +/- 0.004 mg/kg if given at 1% recovery. The ED80 for edrophonium was 0.22 +/- 0.04 mg/kg and 1.14 +/- 0.33 mg/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 16.6 +/- 3.5 and 35.3 +/- 8.9 at 90% and 99% blockade respectively (P less than 0.006). We conclude that the relative potency of neostigmine is greater than that of edrophonium for antagonism of profound atracurium blockade.     

Interaction of verapamil with gallamine and pancuronium and reversal of combined neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine and edrophonium

In this in vitro study, the effects and interactions of verapamil with gallamine and pancuronium and reversal by edrophonium and neostigmine of combined neuromuscular blockade, produced by the muscle relaxants and verapamil, were studied in an avian skeletal muscle. The results show that verapamil reduced the amplitude of indirectly-elicited twitch tension and potentiated the neuromuscular blockade produce by the two muscle relaxants. Edrophonium and neostigmine reversed the neuromuscular blockade produce by the muscle relaxants alone, and in combination with verapamil. Edrophonium was more potent than neostigmine in reversing the combined neuromuscular blockade produced by the muscle relaxants with and without verapamil.     

Neostigmine but not edrophonium prolongs the action of mivacurium

Purpose  

To examine the influence of anticholinesterase drugs neostigmine and edrophonium (which have different effects on plasma cholinesterase activity) administered for antagonism of neuromuscular block on the duration of action of mivacurium (a neuromuscular blocking drug metabolised by plasma cholinesterase).     

Reversal of profound paralysis: use of large doses of edrophonium to antagonize vecuronium and pancuronium induced neuromuscular blockade

The ability to evoke reversal of dense vecuronium- and pancuronium-induced paralysis (T1 10% of control) with edrophonium 1.0 mg.kg-1 was studied using train-of-four nerve stimulation and electromyographic monitoring. Two different end-points, train-of-four ratios of 0.5 and 0.7, were used to define "adequate reversal", and the results for both relaxants were compared. Reversal was reliable and rapid for vecuronium if either ratio was used with times of 2.8 (1.5) and 9 (3) min required to achieve ratios of 0.5 and 0.7, respectively. However, if the block was due to pancuronium, reversal was unreliable with 2 of 9 and 4 of 9 patients not achieving ratios of 0.5 and 0.7, respectively. Reversal was also markedly prolonged in this group with a mean time of 37 (23) min to achieve a ratio of 0.7, and in almost half these patients a supplementary dose of edrophonium was required.     

Neostigmine reversal of d-tubocurarine and pancuronium bromide combinations in man

This study measured the neostigmine reversal of a non-depolarizing block in 17 patients, each given d-tubocurarine and pancuronium bromide in an alternating sequence. Reversal times were similar to those previously reported for pancuronium bromide alone. It is concluded that the anaesthetist may alternate between d-tubocurarine and pancuronium bromide without fear of difficulty with neostigmine reversal.     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neuromuscular blocking action of suxamethonium after antagonism of vecuronium by edrophonium, pyridostigmine or neostigmine

The reported effects of edrophonium on a subsequent dose of suxamethonium are variable and the effects of pyridostigmine have not been evaluated extensively. We have studied this interaction in patients anaesthetized with propofol and sufentanil. After recovery from an initial bolus (1 mg kg-1) of suxamethonium, vecuronium was infused to produce 75% block. After 30 min, the infusion was discontinued and saline 5 ml, edrophonium 0.75 mg kg-1, pyridostigmine 0.24 mg kg-1 or neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1 was given. Fifteen minutes later the mean durations of a second bolus of suxamethonium were: 10.5 (SD 3.9) min (saline), 10.9 (3.7) min (edrophonium), 18.7 (5.4) min (pyridostigmine) and 23.8 (7.4) min (neostigmine). Corresponding plasma cholinesterase activities (percentage of baseline) were: 91 (18), 87 (9), 21 (10) and 52 (26). When both treatment groups and individual patients were compared, the changes in duration of action did not correlate with changes in cholinesterase activity. These data suggest that other mechanisms in addition to cholinesterase inhibition may contribute to this drug interaction.      

Onset of pancuronium and d-tubocurarine blockade with priming

The synergistic effect of pancuronium bromide (PCB) and d-tubocurarine (DTC) on the onset time of neuromuscular blockade was tested in 108 ASA physical status I and II adults anaesthetized with thiopentone, nitrous oxide and halothane. Either saline or a small (priming) dose (DTC, 0.04 mg X kg-1, or PCB, 0.007 mg X kg-1) was administered 3 min before a paralyzing dose of either DTC or PCB. The total dose of relaxant was equivalent to DTC, 0.4 mg X kg-1, or PCB, 0.07 mg X kg-1. Neuromuscular activity was measured using train-of-four stimulation applied every 12 s. Time to 50 per cent first twitch blockade was 63 +/- 4.6 s (mean +/- SEM) with DTC and 88 +/- 5.2 s with PCB (p less than 0.002). Times to 90 per cent blockade were not different between the two drugs (161 +/- 20 s and 141 +/- 21 s respectively). Priming a DTC blockade with either DTC or PCB or priming a PCB blockade with PCB produced an acceleration of less than 10 s at all levels of blockade. Compared with PCB alone, priming PCB blockade with DTC reduced the time to 50 per cent blockade to 71 +/- 4.5 s (p less than 0.02) and to 90 per cent blockade to 111 +/- 8 s (p less than 0.05). Priming did not affect the duration of action significantly, except in the case of PCB priming of DTC, where duration was increased from 39 +/- 4.4 to 57 +/- 4 min (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antagonism of pancuronium and tubocurarine blocks by edrophonium or neostigmine: a comparative study

Edrophonium 0.5 and neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1 were compared as antagonists of pancuronium and tubocurarine-induced neuromuscular blocks, at varying degrees of recovery, in groups of 20 patients each. Adequate antagonism was defined as attaining a sustained train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.7 or more. Administration of edrophonium was associated with a more rapid onset of action (17 s with both relaxants with edrophonium, and 31 s and 29 s with neostigmine with pancuronium and tubocurarine, respectively), and a shorter time to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 (74 s and 48 s with edrophonium and 230 s and 293 s with neostigmine for pancuronium and tubocurarine blocks, respectively). However, whereas neostigmine administration provided adequate antagonism in all 20 patients given pancuronium and in 19 out of 20 patients given tubocurarine, edrophonium failed to achieve adequate antagonism in six patients after pancuronium and eight patients after tubocurarine. The majority of these patients had shown three or less responses to a TOF stimulation prior to antagonism. Two separate groups of 10 patients each with relatively deeper pancuronium or tubocurarine blocks (three or less responses to TOF stimulation) were given edrophonium in a dose of 1.0 mg kg-1. However, adequate antagonism even with this dose of edrophonium was attained in only two out of 10 patients given pancuronium and in five out of 10 patients given tubocurarine. It is concluded that edrophonium is unreliable for antagonism of relatively deep blocks by pancuronium or tubocurarine and that neostigmine is the preferred and more reliable antagonist.     

Neostigmine antagonism of succinylcholine phase II block: a comparison with pancuronium

To assess the efficacy of neostigmine antagonism of succinylcholine phase II block, succinylcholine infusions were given to 17 patients for durations varying from 44 to 192 minutes. A control group (17 patients) received a pancuronium infusion for similar times. Ninety per cent neuromuscular block was maintained in these two groups by adjustment of the infusion rates and, in a third group, with intermittent doses of pancuronium. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored with train-of-four stimulation every 12 seconds and anaesthesia was maintained with N2O-O2-enflurane. Ten minutes after the infusion was stopped, atropine and neostigmine were given to all patients who received pancuronium and to 11 patients in the succinylcholine group whose train-of-four ratio (T4/T1) was less than 0.7. During the subsequent 15 minutes, recovery was more rapid in the succinylcholine group than in either the pancuronium-infusion or pancuronium-bolus groups. It is concluded that succinylcholine-induced phase II block can be safely and rapidly antagonized with neostigmine.