Preliminary toxicity analysis of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube

The objective of this study was to provide preliminary toxicity data of multiple-cycle combination chemotherapy with intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and intravenous (IV) paclitaxel for further clinical trials. The toxicity data of 42 patients with mullerian carcinoma who underwent IP carboplatin therapy in combination with IV paclitaxel were retrospectively analyzed. Chemotherapy was repeated through the Bard IP port placed at initial surgery using IV paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 followed by IP carboplatin. The doses of carboplatin were either at area under the curve (AUC) = 5, 6, 6.5, 7, or 7.5. The toxicity data in a total of 237 cycles were analyzed. The median number of cycles for IP chemotherapy was 6 (range: 3-12). The incidences of maximal grade toxicities in all cycles were: grade (G)2/3 nausea/vomiting, 23.8%; G2/3 constipation, 42.9%; G2 abdominal pain, 28.6%; G2/3 sensory neuropathy, 14.3%; motor neuropathy, 4.8%; myalgia/arthralgia 33.4%; G3/4 neutrocytopenia, 85.4%; and G3/4 anemia, 35.4%. These were not related to the dose of carboplatin. The incidences of G3 thrombocytopenia in relation to the dose of carboplatin were AUC = 5, 0%; 6, 31.6%; 6.5, 44.4%; 7, 25.0%; and 7.5, 80%. G4 thrombocytopenia did not occur. A dose of carboplatin between AUC = 6 and 7 with IV paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 is warranted for further evaluation.     

Treatment Tolerance and Side Effects of Intraperitoneal Carboplatin and Dose-Dense Intravenous Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer

Objective

To describe the frequency of clinically significant side effects associated with adjuvant intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and intravenous (IV) dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Phase I feasibility study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel followed by intraperitoneal paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

Purpose

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown a survival advantage over intravenous chemotherapy for women with newly diagnosed optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. However, significant toxicity has limited its acceptance. In an effort to reduce toxicity, the Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase I study to evaluate the feasibility of day 1 intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin followed by day 8 IP paclitaxel on an every 21-day cycle.

Methods

Patients with Stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal carcinomas or carcinosarcoma received paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV over 3 h followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m² IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8 of a 21 day cycle with 6 cycles planned. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia or dose-delay of greater than 2 weeks due to failure to recover counts, or Grade 3–5 non-hematologic toxicity occurring within the first 4 cycles of treatment.

Results

Twenty of 23 patients enrolled were evaluable and nineteen (95%) completed all six cycles of therapy. Three patients experienced a DLT consisting of infection with normal absolute neutrophil count, grade 3 hyperglycemia, and grade 4 abdominal pain.

Conclusions

This modified IP regimen which administers both IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin on day one, followed by IP paclitaxel on day eight, of a twenty-one day cycle appears feasible and is an attractive alternative to the intraperitoneal treatment regimen administered in GOG-0172.     

Bevacizumab, paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced ovarian cancer: low risk of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxicity

The purpose of this preliminary study was to retrospectively assess the incidence of bowel perforation and hypertension in two separate advanced ovarian cancer patient populations following first-line therapy, comprising paclitaxel, carboplatin and bevacizumab. The first 20 patients were treated with six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC of 5 i.v.), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg of body weight); q21 days per an independent protocol. The subsequent patients (n = 12) were administered weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC of 5 i.v.) every four weeks, and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg of body weight) every two weeks for six cycles according to a separate, independent protocol. Bevacizumab was not added to either chemotherapy regimen until cycle 2. In both groups patients who achieved a complete response, partial response or stable disease at the conclusion of induction therapy received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) q21 days as maintenance therapy. A total of 170 cycles (median = 6; range 3-6) of primary induction chemotherapy, 140 of which contained bevacizumab, were administered. Moreover, 206 cycles (median = 9; range 1-12) of maintenance chemotherapy have been delivered to 28 patients thus far. There was no incidence of GI perforation and only two patients demonstrated clinically significant hypertension. Previous studies involving bevacizumab have raised concerns regarding bowel perforations and hypertension. However, we did not encounter difficulties with either of these complications. While we recognize that the risk for bowel perforation remains in the 5-11% range, the study's preliminary results suggest that first-line treatment of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma with bevacizumab can be safely administered.     

Endometrial carcinoma with laparotomy wound recurrence: complete remission following surgery and chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and carboplatin

We present a patient with surgical stage I endometrial cancer who experienced laparotomy wound recurrence 4 years after primary treatment. She was treated successfully by complete surgical resection of recurrent tumors and chemotherapy. A 62-year-old white female with laparotomy wound recurrence of endometrial carcinoma with small-bowel involvement and concomitant subcutaneous metastasis in the abdominal wall underwent complete surgical resection of metastatic tumors followed by six cycles of chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5). Since 24 months after resection of recurrence, she has no evidence of disease recurrence. Endometrial carcinoma with laparotomy wound recurrences, especially those with concomitant metastases, can be successfully treated by complete surgical resection followed by chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and carboplatin.     

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk stage III and IV endometrial cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE: To determine overall survival and progression-free survival among patients with high-risk, stage III and IV endometrial cancer who receive paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) after complete tumor resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV endometrial cancer with less than 2 cm of disease after surgical resection who received TC in the adjuvant setting were retrospectively identified and are the subject of this analysis. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. Disease recurrence was documented by radiologic progression or pathologic tissue review. We obtained Institutional Review Board approval before initiating this study. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were eligible for analysis--24 (50%) with stage IV disease, 29 (60%) with serous or clear cell tumor histology and 43 (90%) with FIGO grade 3 tumors. All patients underwent surgical resection; 10 (21%) of the 48 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy. Forty-three patients (90%) received 6 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the curve of 5-6) every 3 or 4 weeks, and 44 (92%) completed all planned cycles of treatment. With a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 6-92), 29 patients (60%) recurred, with a 3-year overall survival rate of 56%. The median time to progression for all patients was 13 months (95% CI 10, 18) with a median OS of 47 months (95% CI, 30--upper limit not achieved). CONCLUSION: TC is a well tolerated, active regimen in the treatment of resected, high-risk stage III and IV endometrial cancer that warrants further investigation.     

A phase I trial of intraperitoneal sustained-release paclitaxel microspheres (Paclimer) in recurrent ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: Paclimer is a biodegradable polymer microsphere formulation containing 10% (w/w) paclitaxel that is designed to provide a sustained-release form of paclitaxel after intraperitoneal (IP) administration. The goals of this phase I study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IP paclitaxel microspheres and the pharmacology of paclitaxel after IP paclitaxel microsphere administration. METHODS: Twelve patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma were treated. After placement of an IP catheter, patients were treated with escalating doses of IP paclitaxel microspheres administered with 2 l of normal saline following premedication. Treatment could be repeated once, 8 weeks after initial treatment. The starting dose was 60 mg/m2 and no intrapatient dose escalation was used. RESULTS: One dose-limiting toxicity consisting of abdominal pain, ileus and bowel obstruction was seen with the second cycle of therapy in one patient who received 900 mg/m2. Patients received up to 1200 mg/m2 without further evidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). The study was discontinued before MTD was defined due to the manufacturer's decision to suspend further clinical development of paclitaxel microspheres. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a trend toward a dose-dependent effect of IP paclitaxel microspheres on measured plasma paclitaxel levels. Sustained paclitaxel levels were maintained throughout all 8 weeks of therapy; however, paclitaxel concentrations were well below the plasma concentrations associated with toxicity. In one patient, laparoscopy revealed extensive adhesions, fat necrosis, foreign body giant cell reaction and detectable residual polymer filaments 7 months after completion of treatment with paclitaxel microspheres. CONCLUSIONS: IP administration of paclitaxel microspheres is well tolerated up to 1200 mg/m2 without defining MTD. The low but persistent detection of plasma paclitaxel indicates that paclitaxel continues to be released for at least 8 weeks after IP paclitaxel microsphere treatment. The finding of significant peritoneal abnormalities, including the presence of residual polymer filaments, months after IP Paclimer treatment suggests that the polymer preparation used in Paclimer degrades slowly.     

It's not just for laparoscopy anymore: use of insufflation under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance by Interventional Radiologists for percutaneous placement of intraperitoneal chemotherapy catheters

Objectives

While intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has shown significant survival benefits, the ability to successfully deliver IP chemotherapy has been limited. In GOG 172, surgically-placed IP catheters had a reported complication rate of 34%. In addition, IP catheters have to be placed surgically. We have developed a novel percutaneous placement technique for IP catheters in patients without ascites.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of all patients receiving percutaneously-placed IP catheters from 12/2008 to present. Catheters were placed using a two-step technique under conscious sedation. IP access was gained using ultrasound-guided peritoneal puncture over the right lobe of the liver. A 5 Fr catheter was placed into the peritoneal cavity and the abdomen insufflated with carbon dioxide (CO₂). Access was gained in the RLQ once distention separated the bowel from the abdominal wall. A 14.5 Fr multi-side hole catheter was coiled in the pelvis, and a reservoir tunneled onto the lower anterior chest wall. For this analysis, abstracted data included patient demographics, indication for catheter placement, complications (procedural and with chemotherapy delivery), fluoroscopy time, and timing/indication of catheter removal.

Results

Eleven patients received IP catheters. The mean age was 58 years, mean body mass index was 27.1, and mean number of days from surgical debulking was 38. There were two stage 2, and eight stage 3 patients. Two patients had fallopian tube, and nine patients had ovarian cancer. All patients had an optimal debulking procedure. Seven of 11 patients also obtained central intravenous access when the IP port was placed. Follow-up data were as follows: Average fluoroscopy time was 9 min. One patient (9%) had an intra-procedural complication but the catheter was successfully placed. Zero patients had catheter-related complications in the course of receiving chemotherapy. Five of the 11 patients (45%) completed the planned IP chemotherapy treatments, with three additional patients (27%) currently receiving therapy. The remaining three patients (27%) discontinued chemotherapy for reasons unrelated to IP catheter function: two due to chemotherapy side effects, and one with sepsis from a perforated diverticulum.

Conclusions

Thus far, our experience with percutaneous placement of IP catheters is associated with a low risk of catheter-related complications and high technical success rates. CO₂ insufflation may make peritoneal puncture easier and potentially safer. This procedure offers an alternative to surgical placement, even in patients without clinically significant ascites.     

Pilot evaluation of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by high-dose melphalan supported by peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel and one consolidation cycle of high-dose melphalan with all cycles supported by hematopoietic stem cells and cytokine, in previously untreated patients with optimally debulked stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients had histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer and optimal initial cytoreductive surgery. No prior chemotherapy was permitted. Adequate performance status, bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function was required. After being mobilized with cyclophosphamide 3 g/m(2), paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2), and filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected by leukapheresis. Patients received three cycles of carboplatin AUC 15 mg. min/ml iv, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and PBSC with filgrastim every 28 days, followed by one cycle of melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and hematopoietic support. RESULTS: Nine patients entered the trial and received all planned cycles of chemotherapy. Of the eight patients who consented to surgical reassessment upon completing therapy, four had residual small-volume macroscopic disease, three had microscopic residual disease, and one had pathologic complete response. The estimated probability of a pathologic complete response was 12.5% (95% confidence interval: 0.3-52.7%). Hematologic toxicity was severe but manageable. Eleven of 45 cycles (24.4%) resulted in hospital admission for neutropenic fever, dehydration +/- diarrhea, syncope, or shortness of breath and pain secondary to tense ascites. CONCLUSIONS: The low pathological complete response rate did not justify toxicity; thus, the study was closed. High-dose chemotherapy as first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer remains experimental and should be restricted to clinical trials.     

The feasibility of carboplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Objective

To reduce toxicities in cisplatin-based intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, we substituted carboplatin for cisplatin. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary toxicity data of carboplatin-based IP chemotherapy and to evaluate the feasibility of this chemotherapy regimen in patients with ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery.

Study design

The toxicity data of 19 primary ovarian cancer patients (IP group) who underwent carboplatin-based IP and intravenous (IV) combination chemotherapy (IP carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1, IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m² on day 2, and IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m² on day 8) after primary debulking surgery were retrospectively analyzed and compared to 34 patients (IV group) who were treated with standard platinum-based IV chemotherapy during the same period.

Results

The toxicity data in a total of 118 cycles were analyzed. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and pain were more common in the IP group than the IV group. There were seven catheter-related complications. Fourteen patients (73.7%) were able to complete six cycles or more of IP chemotherapy. Survival results in the IP group were compared with those from the IV group; a prolonged progression-free survival was observed (26.6 vs. 20.7 months; p = 0.038). Compared to the previous results with cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in hematologic events. However, gastrointestinal, neurologic, and metabolic events in this study were definitely lower compared to those of cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Carboplatin-based IP and IV combination chemotherapy is feasible in patients with ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery.     

Experience with single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following primary chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Twelve cycles of single-agent paclitaxel have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer whom achieved a clinical complete response to a primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This trial was conducted to compare the toxicity and disease-free interval of 3 cycles vs. 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation in patients treated with an intensive three-drug front-line regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, 26 ovarian cancer patients received primary chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, day 1), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), day 1 day 8), with treatment repeated every 21 days x 6 cycles. The first 13 patients (group A) received three additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days). The second set of 13 patients (group B) also received three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) and then received nine additional cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) consolidation therapy. The change from 3 cycles to 12 cycles of consolidation therapy for group B was made following the published results of GOG 178. RESULTS: In group A, all 13 patients completed three courses of consolidation therapy. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and two patients exhibited both grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 3 patients (23%). In group B, 9 of the 13 patients whom were intended to receive 12 total cycles of paclitaxel consolidation were able to complete the program. There was no grade 3-4 neutropenia or anemia in this population, although 1 patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 7 patients (54%). Although not a randomized experience, median progression-free interval was 76 weeks for group B, and 47 weeks for group A. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel consolidation therapy can be administered for 12 cycles following first-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine induction therapy, but there is considerable risk for development of a moderately severe peripheral neuropathy.     

Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate reasons for discontinuation of IVF treatment. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Center for reproductive medicine at a large university hospital. PATIENT(S): The 450 couples of a cohort of 974 couples who started IVF treatment between January 1996 and December 1997 and did not achieve childbirth. INTERVENTION(S): The reasons for ceasing treatment were evaluated by scrutinizing the medical records for all couples (n = 288) who did not achieve live birth and who did not complete three stimulated IVF cycles. A questionnaire was sent to all patients for whom the reason for discontinuation was not obvious from the medical records (n = 211). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reasons for discontinuing IVF. RESULT(S): Of 450 couples not achieving live birth, 208 completed their subsidized cycles, whereas 242 discontinued IVF. In 192 (79%) of the 242 cases, the reasons for ceasing treatment could be identified from records or questionnaires. The reason for discontinuation was psychological burden in 26%, a poor prognosis in 25%, spontaneous pregnancy in 19%, physical burden in 6%, serious disease in 2%, and other reasons in 7%. CONCLUSION(S): An unexpectedly high percentage of couples who performed IVF discontinued the treatment before the three cycles that were offered to a majority of the couples. A majority of these discontinuations were due to psychological stress. This information is of importance when counseling patients during treatment.     

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Canadian perspective

The objectives of this study were to: a) assess the position of Canadian gynecological oncologists (GOC) toward intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy as primary treatment for ovarian cancer, b) initiate a process of communication among GOC, and c) assess the perception of barriers to implementing IP chemotherapy across Canada. An electronic practice survey was mailed to all GOC in January 2006. The response rate was 62%. GOC accept IP chemotherapy as the standard of care in the primary treatment of optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer. The majority of respondents were working on implementation strategies at their local institutions. The cost of administration and use of additional resources were identified as sources of moderate and high concerns, respectively. Moderate concerns were expressed with regard to the management of systemic and local toxicity, catheter complications, patients' acceptance, and quality of life. Catheter insertion issues were of low concern to most respondents. Previous experience with IP administration did not significantly impact the perceived level of concern. GOC support the use of IP chemotherapy for appropriate patients with ovarian cancer. This survey identifies important implementation challenges of IP therapy for Canada, and processes must be developed before successful delivery of IP chemotherapy can be realized. This survey serves to initiate a process of communication among GOC. A collaborative effort will be needed to facilitate this change in practice. Further study of the implementation process is warranted as more experience is gained with this modality of treatment.     

Surgical complications connected with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: From a theoretical viewpoint, intraperitoneal therapy (i.p.) in-patients with ovarian cancer, a malignancy, which remains mainly, confined to the peritoneal cavity is logical. Intraperitoneal catheters have moved to the forefront as a delivery system in cancer treatment. Authors have described complications during the placement, usage, and evacuation of Tenckhoff catheters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1996 to January 2003, 118 patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer, after surgery and first line chemotherapy, have had catheter insertion, but only 91 have had catheter evacuation: because of: not complete therapy (21 patients). Three patients died during i.p. therapy, Four times intraperitoneal catheter has spontaneously fold out. RESULTS: During insertion total number of complications reached (7.63%)--6 bowel incision, 1 bladder incision, 1 hernia of the linea alba, 1 incision of bowel and bladder. During catheter evacuation total number of complications was 9 (7.63%), 8 bowel incisions, 1 hernia of the linea alba. Complications connected with catheter function: only 10 patients required cessation of chemotherapy prior to its expected completion because of following reasons: 2 fistula of the catheter to vagina, 2 fistulas to bowel, in four cases intraperitoneal catheter has spontaneously fold out due to abscess (two after citostatics flow under the skin, and two without clear reason probably because of not proper fixation) one because of abscess in peritoneal cavity, and problems with citostatics inflow, one because of subileus. CONCLUSION: 1 Surgical complications occurring during IPC are not dangerous for patients. 2 IPC is valid and safety way of treatment ovarian cancer patients. 3 The frequency of complications occurring during insertion of Tenckhoff catheter depends on the way of placement. 4 We do not noticed connections between frequency of complications and sum of insertion made by the surgeon.     

Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy as front-line treatment for patients with Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer following optimal primary cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Based on Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols #172 and #158, a decision analysis model was created to compare two treatment strategies for patients with optimal residual disease Stage III ovarian cancer: (1) inpatient intravenous paclitaxel (24 h) and intraperitoneal cisplatin plus outpatient intraperitoneal paclitaxel chemotherapy (IP/IV), and (2) outpatient intravenous paclitaxel (3 h) and carboplatin chemotherapy (IV/IV). The cost-effectiveness of each strategy was evaluated from the perspective of society. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that the strategy of IP/IV chemotherapy had an overall cost per patient of $39,861 and effectiveness of 5.16 QALYs compared to $18,822 and 4.59 QALYs for IV/IV chemotherapy. The IP/IV chemotherapy strategy was associated with an additional 0.56 QALYs at an incremental cost of $21,039. The incremental C/E ratio for IP/IV chemotherapy was $37,454/QALY. Inpatient treatment accounted for 43.2% of the cost of IP/IV chemotherapy. Sensitivity analysis testing confirmed the robustness of the model. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, IP/IV chemotherapy was associated with a modest extension in quality-adjusted survival time but was also more costly than IV/IV chemotherapy. On balance, the IP/IV strategy can be considered a good healthcare value. However, these data also suggest that efforts to reduce the cost of IP/IV chemotherapy, such as through development of an ambulatory regimen with equivalent therapeutic efficacy but an improved toxicity profile, would improve the overall value of this adjuvant treatment program.     

Is age a barrier to the aggressive treatment of ovarian cancer with paclitaxel and carboplatin?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the toxicities associated with chemotherapy are age related in women treated for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer underwent cytoreductive surgery. Adjunctive therapy was given to each patient consisting of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h with a subsequent 30-min IV infusion of carboplatin. Carboplatin dose was calculated to achieve a targeted area under the curve (AUC) of 5.0-7.5. Treatment was repeated at 21- to 28-day intervals for six cycles. Toxicities were graded after each dose of chemotherapy. Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and log likelihood ratio to compare toxicities in women age <60 years old to women >/=60 years old. RESULTS: Fifty-three women, 22 of whom were >/=60 years old, were treated with 309 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-eight patients (92%) completed all six cycles. AUC dosing of carboplatin was equivalent for both groups. Carboplatin dose reduction occurred in 75% of patients for grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. No patient required a reduction in the paclitaxel dose. Neutropenia was less frequent in women >/=60 years old than in women <60 years old (P = 0.02). There was no difference between women <60 years old and women >/=60 years old in the incidence of anemia, thrombocytopenia, or the use of growth factors. A 68% complete clinical response rate was observed in women >/=60 years old compared to a 74% complete response rate for women under age 60 (P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Age is not a barrier to the aggressive treatment of ovarian cancer with this regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin.     

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian and Peritoneal Cancers in Patients Following Interval Debulking Surgery or Primary Cytoreductive Surgery: Tom Baker Cancer Centre Experience From 2006 to 2009

ObjectiveTo describe our experience with cisplatin- and paclitaxel-based IP chemotherapy in patients treated initially with either neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary cytoreductive surgery (PCRS).MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of the records of 67 patients (38 IDS, 29 PCRS) enrolled in the intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy program at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre between 2006 and 2009. Information pertaining to patient demographics, IP chemotherapy toxicity, and catheter complications was extracted, and the median time to recurrence was calculated.ResultsMost patients in the study were aged 50 to 70 years and had a diagnosis of stage III serous ovarian cancer. Overall, 295/393 IP cycles (75%) were successfully administered. The proportion of patients completing six cycles of chemotherapy in the IDS and PCRS groups was 53% and 59%, respectively. Frequent (> 25%) Grade 1 to 2 chemotherapy toxicities included fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and nausea. Catheter complications were observed in 34% of patients (23/67). The recurrence rates for patients completing four or more cycles of IP chemotherapy in the IDS and PCRS groups were 58% and 35%, respectively, with the median time to recurrence approximately one year.ConclusionAlthough IP chemotherapy is well tolerated in both IDS and PCRS patients, the median time to recurrence is shorter than expected.     

A pilot study of three-cycle consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with clinical complete response after paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three additional cycles of paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with clinical complete response (CR). Patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer stages II-IV with clinical CR after primary surgery and six cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum entered into the study. Three cycles of paclitaxel/platinum (cisplatin, carboplatin) were administered as a consolidation chemotherapy only in patients who agreed to the informed consent. Patients without further treatment served as controls. A total of 81 patients entered into the study. According to the informed consent, 42 patients were treated by the consolidation chemotherapy, and 39 patients were followed up without further treatment. The median actuarial disease-free survival for the patients with and without consolidation chemotherapy was 25.0 months and 26.0 months, respectively (P= 0.80). The median overall survival is not reached. World Health Organization grade 3-4 toxicities in the consolidation arm were increased but showed no significant differences statistically. Although the sample size is small and not randomized, these results suggest that three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum might not provide a favorable outcome in patients with a clinical CR.     

Positive emission tomography for evaluating a complete clinical response in patients with ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma: correlation with second-look laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Positive emission tomography (PET) provides a novel means of imaging malignancies. The following study was undertaken to evaluate the predictive value of PET in determining a pathologic complete response in patients with advanced ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma who had a complete clinical response following primary chemotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with advanced-stage ovarian (N = 17) or peritoneal (N = 5) carcinoma who had achieved complete clinical and radiologic remission and normal CA-125 level after six cycles of chemotherapy and who had consented to a second look laparotomy procedure were studied. All patients received platinum based therapy and all but one patient, treated elsewhere, received paclitaxel in combination with platinum. Following IV administration of 20 mCi [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), the entire abdomen and pelvis were scanned. Various technical modifications including bladder activity dilution, intravenous hydration with diuretic therapy, and mechanical bowel preparations, were used to reduce background activity. Second-look laparotomy findings were classified as negative, macroscopically positive if a biopsy of a suspicious area was histologically positive, or microscopically positive if only a nonsuspicious area was histologically positive. The effect of patient preparation prior to PET imaging was evaluated. RESULTS: Persistent disease was found in 13 of the 22 patients (59%). Only one of nine sites with macroscopic and none of four with microscopic disease were accurately predicted. The sensitivity was only 10% and the specificity 42%. Intravenous hydration, diuretic therapy, and bowel preparation did not improve the results. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that despite technical modifications the sensitivity of PET before second-look laparotomy for small-volume persistent disease is low.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

This study aimed to determine the first-cycle maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and then assess the feasibility of this dose over multiple cycles.

Methods

Beginning at an intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin dose area under the curve (AUC) of 5 and a fixed intravenous dose of 175 mg/m² paclitaxel, patients were entered on a dose-escalating phase evaluating first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After estimating the MTD, cohorts of 20 patients were then entered in an expanded phase to evaluate DLT over four cycles.

Results

Twenty-one patients were entered on the dose-escalating phase. A first-cycle MTD of carboplatin at AUC 8 was tolerated although thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting over multiple cycles. An additional 69 patients were treated in expanded cohorts. Only 5/90 (5.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of a port problem. Four-cycle DLT required de-escalation to a carboplatin AUC of 6, and even at that dose, there were 14 dose-limiting toxic effects in 40 patients (35%). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were due to neutropenia, and 6 were due to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Six cycles of therapy were completed in 75% of eligible patients, but dose adjustments were required.

Conclusions

The first-cycle MTD did not predict the tolerability of this regimen over multiple cycles. Using an IP carboplatin dose of AUC 6 in combination with paclitaxel, the regimen can be administered with a high completion rate over multiple cycles. Because neutropenia is a frequent DLT, the addition of hematopoietic growth factors may permit a high completion rate while maintaining this dose.