The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin--the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group.

PURPOSE: In early clinical trials with patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the neurokinin antagonist aprepitant significantly enhanced the efficacy of a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of a type-three 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist and a corticosteroid. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was performed to establish definitively the superiority of the aprepitant regimen versus standard therapy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving cisplatin > or = 70 mg/m2 for the first time were given either standard therapy (ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; dexamethasone on days 2 to 4) or an aprepitant regimen (aprepitant plus ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2 to 3; dexamethasone on day 4). Patients recorded nausea and vomiting episodes in a diary. The primary end point was complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy) on days 1 to 5 postcisplatin, analyzed by a modified intent-to-treat approach. Treatment comparisons were made using logistic regression models. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events and physical and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with complete response on days 1 to 5 was significantly higher in the aprepitant group (72.7% [n = 260] v 52.3% in the standard therapy group [n = 260]), as were the percentages on day 1, and especially on days 2 to 5 (P <.001 for all three comparisons). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard dual therapy, addition of aprepitant was generally well tolerated and provided consistently superior protection against CINV in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy.     

Measuring the maintenance of daily life activities using the functional living index-emesis (FLIE) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Healthcare providers believe they have a positive impact on controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), yet patients still consider CINV to be one of the most distressing side effects of chemotherapy. The effect of CINV on daily activities has been measured using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) scale, a validated, nausea- and vomiting-specific, patient-reported outcome instrument comprising nine items in each of two domains. This research explores the potential correlation between reducing CINV and improved quality of life. In clinical trials, patients completed the FLIE questionnaires 24 and 96 hours after receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and antiemetic therapy using a serotonin receptor antagonist (ondansetron, dolasetron, or palonosetron). Significantly more patients given palonosetron had FLIE scores that reflected lessened impact of nausea on daily life during the acute period (0-24 hours) and of nausea/vomiting during both the acute and delayed periods (days 2-4).These findings strongly suggest that better antiemetic prevention allows patients to maintain their functional status for up to 5 days after chemotherapy.     

Antiemetic control with palonosetron in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen in addition to either irinotecan or oxaliplatin: a retrospective study

Background: For moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, palonosetron (PALO) is reported to provide complete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in 69% of patients. Prior to August 2009, our gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients receiving the moderately emetogenic compounds oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus a fluoropyrimidine regimen received ondansetron and dexamethasone orally on day 1 of chemotherapy for CINV prevention. Beginning in August of 2009, ondansetron was replaced by PALO 0.25 mg (intravenous push). Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective study of GI cancer patients who received oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus a fluoropyrimidine. Failure of an antiemetic regimen was defined as grade ≥1 vomiting or grade ≥2 nausea (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3) on days 1 through 5 following chemotherapy. Patients were divided for analysis into pre-PALO and post-PALO cohorts. Fisher's exact test compared cohort differences. Results: A total of 305 patients were included in the study, with 157 patients in the pre-PALO cohort and 148 in the post-PALO cohort. For all patients, the risk of antiemetic failure was reduced from 50.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.2-58.4%] to 28.4% (95% CI 21.3-36.4%) with PALO. This reduction in the relative risk of antiemetic failure was observed in all subgroups. Conclusion: The addition of PALO may provide increased control of CINV for the moderately emetogenic regimens of oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus a fluoropyrimidine in GI cancer patients.     

Palonosetron: a second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life. The emetogenicity of the chemotherapeutic agents, repeated chemotherapy cycles and patient risk factors (female gender, younger age, alcohol consumption, history of motion sickness) are the major risk factors for CINV. The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)3 receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone has significantly improved the control of acute CINV, but delayed nausea and vomiting remains a clinical problem. A new agent, palonosetron, has recently been approved for the prevention of acute CINV in patients receiving either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and for the prevention of delayed CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Palonosetron is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with a longer half-life and a higher binding affinity than first-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. In a single dosing study, palonosetron was highly effective in controlling CINV compared with a single dose of dolasetron or ondansetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Palonosetron in combination with dexamethasone demonstrated control of CINV in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Palonosetron appeared to be as effective in subsequent courses of chemotherapy compared with the initial course of chemotherapy. There were no clinically relevant differences seen among palonosetron, ondansetron or dolasetron in laboratory, electrocardiographic or vital-sign changes, and adverse reactions reported in the clinical trials were the most common reactions reported for the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist class. Recent studies using palonosetron-based anti-emetic combinations in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well as in the clinical setting of multiple-day chemotherapy, have been reported. Future studies may consider the use of palonosetron with current and other new agents and in other clinical settings, such as bone marrow transplantation and radiation therapy.     

Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in elderly patients

Although elderly patients have been reported to be less prone to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), its management is complicated by a high frequency of comorbidities and polypharmacy and an increased risk of dehydration and impaired cognition.The comparative efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron and ondansetron/dolasetron were assessed in a retrospective post hoc analysis using pooled data from 171 elderly patients (age > or = 65 years) with cancer enrolled in two randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical studies comparing single IV doses of these antiemetic agents given prior to receipt of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.The complete response rate during the postchemotherapy period was significantly higher in the palonosetron group than in the ondansetron/dolasetron group in the 5 days following chemotherapy.The proportion of patients who were nausea-free on the problematic days 2 and 3 post chemotherapy and the time to treatment failure also significantly favored palonosetron. In this population that included patients with pre-existing comorbidities, palonosetron was well tolerated, with similar or fewer adverse events than the comparators. Comparisons in electrocardiogram parameters revealed that the mean postdose change from baseline in QTc interval was 3 ms for palonosetron 0.25 mg and 5 ms for ondansetron/dolasetron. In this retrospective analysis, palonosetron provided superior efficacy to ondansetron/dolasetron for the treatment of CINV in elderly patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Based on its safety profile, antiemetic control, and convenient dosing, palonosetron can be recommended for use in elderly patients with cancer receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.     

The efficacy of oral ondansetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy – a retrospective audit

NG W.L. & DELLA‐FIORENTINA S.A. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care 19 , 403–407
The efficacy of oral ondansetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy – a retrospective audit The optimal dose of oral ondansetron for the prevention of acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) resulting from moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) is unknown. This retrospective audit was conducted to determine the efficacy of 8 mg oral ondansetron plus 8 mg oral dexamethasone as pre‐chemotherapy anti‐emetic regimen for patients receiving MEC. The efficacy outcomes analysed were the proportion of patients with no acute vomiting, proportion of patients with no acute nausea and the incidence of grade 3 or 4 CINV. A total of 81 patients were identified. The most frequent chemotherapy regimens received in the study population were anthracycline‐ (48%) and carboplatin‐based (28%). No acute vomiting and nausea rates in the study population were 75% and 44% respectively. The incidence of grade 3 CINV was 1%. Patients who received anthracycline‐based regimens had a significantly higher incidence of acute emesis (P= 0.001) and nausea (P < 0.0001) when compared with patients who received non‐anthracycline‐based regimens. In this study, the use of 8 mg oral ondansetron plus 8 mg oral dexamethasone achieved control of acute emesis in 75% of all patients receiving MEC which is comparable to previously reported rates of 70–80%. The benefits of using oral pre‐chemotherapy anti‐emetics include reduction in the costs of drugs and nursing administration time.     

Infusion of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are the foundation of standard antiemetic care for cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. To enhance the efficacy of these supportive care agents, dexamethasone is routinely admixed with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, which is administered by intravenous infusion before chemotherapy begins. This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous palonosetron admixed with dexamethasone to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer patients received palonosetron 0.25 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg admixed in 50 mL of infusion solution before receiving at least one qualifying chemotherapeutic agent (cyclophosphamide < or = 1,500 mg/m2, doxorubicin > or = 20 mg/m2, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin). Patients used diaries to record nausea and emesis experienced and rescue medications used. Of 32 participants, 27 (84%) had a complete response (no emesis and no rescue medication) during the acute (0-24 hours) interval posttherapy, 19 (59%) had a complete response during the delayed (> 24-120 hours) posttherapeutic interval, and 19 (59%) had a complete response during the overall (0-120 hours) posttreatment interval. A total of 23 patients (72%) had no emetic episodes, 16 (50%) had no nausea, and 21 (66%) used no rescue medication throughout the overall 5-day interval. The combination was well tolerated. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone given as a pretreatment infusion is effective and safe in preventing acute and delayed CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.     

Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is superior to ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis in chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study assessed whetherthe addition of dexamethasone to ondansetron leads to improvedcontrol of chemotherapy - induced emesis, both in patients undergoingtheir first course of highly emetogenic chemotherapy and inchemotherapypretreated patients refractory to standard anti-emetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either 20 mg dexamethasoneas an intravenous infusion or placebo plus ondansetron 8 mg15 minutes prior to and 4 and 8 hours after the administrationof chemotherapy. According to the randomisation code patientsreceived from day 2 to day 5 either ondansetron 8 mg p.o. +placebo p.o., three times daily, or ondansetron 8 mg p.o. +dexamethasone 4 mg p.o., three times daily. Patients undergoingmultiple-day treatment received intravenous study treatmenton the days of chemotherapy and thereafter oral treatment asoutlined above. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were entered into the study. Of these,207 were evaluable (111 previously-untreated and 96 previously-treatedpatients). In the chemotherapynaive patients the combinationof ondansetron plus dexamethasone was significantly superiorto ondansetron plus placebo in protecting the patients completelyfrom emesis (retching and vomiting) (81% versus 64%, p –0.04). The mean number of vomiting episodes was significantlylower in the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone-treated patientsthan in those receiving ondansetron plus placebo (0.8 versus2.1, p – 0.03). In this group of patients there was significantlysuperior protection from emesis on the second day (pvalue –0.04), and a trend towards a better protection on the thirdand fourth days. On each day the active combination offeredbetter protection from nausea with an approximately 20% differencein favor of ondansetron plus dexamethasone. In the group ofestablished vomiters the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethansonewas superior to ondansetron plus placebo in protecting the patientsfrom acute emesis, with 70% versus 48% of the patients beingcompletely protected (p = 0.03). The mean number of vomitingepisodes was significantly lower in the ondansetron-plusdexamethasone-treated-patientsthan in those receiving ondansetron plus placebo (0.9 versus2.1, p = 0.02). In the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone arm 55%of the patients had complete protection from nausea, retchingand vomiting compared to 35% in the ondansetron-plus-placebo-treatedgroup (p = 0.05). Overall 22% of the patients (20% in the ondansetronplus-placeboand 25% in the ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone arm) experiencedat least one, usually mild, adverse event. More patients inthe ondansetron-plus-dexamethasone arm complained of epigastricpain or burning (8/101 versus 4/112, p-value = 0.16). The differencein patients reporting constipation (6/101 versus 0/112) washighly significant at a p-value of 0.008. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of dexamethasone plus ondansetron is more effectivein protecting chemotherapynaive patients undergoing their firstcourse of highly emetogenic chemotherapy with cisplatin andchemotherapy-pretreated patients refractory to standard antiemeticsfrom chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting compared to ondansetronplus placebo. nausea, vomiting, chemotherapy, ondansetron, dexamethasone, delayed emesis     

Pathogenesis-based treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting--two new agents

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life. The emetogenicity of the chemotherapeutic agents, repeated chemotherapy cycles, and patient risk factors (female gender, younger age, alcohol consumption, history of motion sickness) are the major risk factors for CINV. The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone has significantly improved the control of acute CINV, but delayed nausea and vomiting remains a significant clinical problem. Although the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dexamethasone, and metoclopramide have been used to prevent delayed CINV, only dexamethasone appears to have much efficacy with acceptable toxicity. Recent studies have introduced two new agents, palonosetron and aprepitant, for the prevention of both acute and delayed CINV. Palonosetron is a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with a longer half life and a higher binding affinity than older 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. It improves the complete response rate (no emesis, no need for rescue) of acute and delayed CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy compared to the older 5-HT3 receptor antagonists.The other agent, aprepitant, is the first agent available in the new drug class of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. When added to a standard regimen of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, it improves the complete response rate of acute CINV. Aprepitant also improves the complete response of delayed CINV when compared to placebo and when used in combination with dexamethasone compared to dexamethasone alone. Acute and delayed nausea may also be improved by aprepitant when used in combination with a 5-HT3 and dexamethasone prechemotherapy or with daily dosing for 3-5 days following chemotherapy. Based on these studies, new guidelines for the prevention of CINV are proposed. Future studies may consider the use of palonosetron and aprepitant with current and other new agents (olanzapine, gabapentin) in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well in the clinical settings of multiple-day chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.     

Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This is the first study in which the NK(1)-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qd) [corrected] or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99%) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8% v 42.5%; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5% v 55.6%; P = .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.     

枢复宁防止由非顺铂化疗所致呕吐的疗效观察

本文报道用枢复宁十地塞米松与灭吐灵十地塞米松随机对照,控制非顺铂化疗诱发的呕吐。58例病人经随机分组后,28例用枢复宁加地塞米松,30例按本院常用剂量灭吐灵加地塞米松治疗。枢复宁十地塞米松对急性恶心和呕吐的完全控制率均显著高于灭吐灵十地塞米松(分别为87％比72％,P<0.05,94％比67％,P<0.001)。对延缓性呕吐的完全控制。枢复宁十地塞米松也高于灭吐灵十地塞米松,分别为85％—94％比58％—82％(P<0.05)。枢复宁十地塞米松副作用轻,主要有头痛(13％)和便秘(9％),不引起锥体外系反应。因此,枢复宁十地塞米松是一个较为有效的联合止吐方案。     

A phase III, double-blind, randomized trial of palonosetron compared with ondansetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This pivotal phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of palonosetron in preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to a single intravenous dose of palonosetron 0.25 mg or 0.75 mg, or ondansetron 32 mg prior to HEC. Dexamethasone pre-treatment (with stratification) was used at investigator discretion. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete response (CR) during the first 24 h post-chemotherapy (acute phase). RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis (n = 667), palonosetron 0.25 mg and 0.75 mg were at least as effective as ondansetron in preventing acute CINV (59.2%, 65.5%, and 57.0% CR rates, respectively); CR rates were slightly higher with palonosetron than ondansetron during the delayed (24-120 h) and overall (0-120 h) phases. Two thirds of patients (n = 447) received concomitant dexamethasone. Patients pre-treated with palonosetron 0.25 mg plus dexamethasone had significantly higher CR rates than those receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the delayed (42.0% versus 28.6%) and overall (40.7% versus 25.2%) phases. Palonosetron and ondansetron were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose palonosetron was as effective as ondansetron in preventing acute CINV following HEC, and with dexamethasone pre-treatment, its effectiveness was significantly increased over ondansetron throughout the 5-day post-chemotherapy period.     

Role of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in chemotherapy-induced emesis: summary of clinical trials

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life, and although the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone has significantly improved the control of acute CINV, delayed nausea and vomiting remain a significant clinical problem. Aprepitant is the first agent available in the new drug class of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. When added to a standard regimen of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, it improves the complete response rate of acute CINV. Aprepitant also improves the complete response of delayed CINV when used in combination with dexamethasone compared to dexamethasone alone. The use of aprepitant in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy will await the review and analysis of recently completed phase III trials. The control of nausea is improved in some studies with the use of aprepitant when it is combined with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone, but nausea control remains suboptimal. The current data suggest that the mechanism of action of the NK-1s appears to be different from the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Future studies may explore the use of aprepitant and other NK-1s in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well in the clinical settings of multiple-day chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.     

Aprepitant: a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life, and although the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone has significantly improved the control of acute CINV, delayed nausea and vomiting remain a significant clinical problem. Aprepitant (Emend), Merck) is the first agent available in the new drug class of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. When added to a standard regimen of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, it improves the complete response rate of acute CINV. Aprepitant also improves the complete response of delayed CINV when used in combination with dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone. Based on these studies, new guidelines for the prevention of CINV have been developed for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The use of aprepitant in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy will await the review and analysis of recently completed Phase III trials. Aprepitant is a substrate, a moderate inhibitor and an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP2C9. Drug interactions should be monitored when aprepitant is coadministered with agents affected by CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 isoenzymes. The safety and efficacy of aprepitant has not been established in pediatric or adolescent patients, and aprepitant has not been evaluated in the treatment of patients with established nausea and vomiting. Future studies may consider the use of aprepitant with current and other new agents in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well in the clinical settings of multiple-day chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.     

Antiemetic efficacy of an oral suspension of granisetron plus dexamethasone and influence of quality of life on risk for nausea and vomiting

OBJECTIVES: To assess the antiemetic efficacy of an oral suspension of granisetron/dexamethasone in patients receiving chemotherapy and to determine whether quality-of-life parameters influence the risk for postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open monocentric study, an oral suspension containing 2 mg granisetron and 16 mg (4 mg for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy) dexamethasone was administered to 43 chemotherapy-naive patients before highly (n = 16) or moderately (n = 27) emetogenic chemotherapy and on the 3 subsequent days (2 for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy). Emetic episodes were recorded and quality of life was assessed prior to each cycle with a questionnaire based on EORTC QLQ-30. RESULTS: In the group undergoing highly (moderately) emetogenic chemotherapy, complete control of acute vomiting was achieved in 60-72.7% (92.6-95.0%), and complete control of delayed vomiting in 37.5-40.0% (75.0-92.2%), of patients within the first 3 (5) cycles. The following quality-of-life parameters were significantly associated with PCNV: tiredness (RR = 1.3, p < 0.05), pain (RR = 1.5), impairment of daily life by pain (RR = 1.7), sensation of abdominal pressure and fullness (RR = 2.5), impairment of social activities (RR = 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily oral administration of a suspension of granisetron/dexamethasone is an active prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting and compares favorably with data reported on intravenous administration. Quality-of-life parameters assessed pre-treatment could help to identify patients at high risk for nausea and vomiting so that antiemetic therapy can be tailored to individual patient risk.     

Phase 2 trial results with the novel neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist casopitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND:

This randomized, double‐blind, dose‐ranging, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 trial evaluated the neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate in combination with ondansetron/dexamethasone (ond/dex) for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) related to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).

METHODS:

Chemotherapy‐naive patients who were receiving MEC (N = 723) were randomized to receive either oral placebo or casopitant at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg daily (on Days 1‐3) plus ondansetron (on Days 1‐3) and dexamethasone (Day 1). Two exploratory arms evaluated single‐dose casopitant (150 mg) plus ond/dex and a 3‐day casopitant regimen with once‐daily ondansetron and dexamethasone. Primary endpoints were rates of complete response (CR) (no vomiting, retching, rescue therapy, or premature discontinuation) and significant nausea (SN) (≥25 mm on a visual analog scale) over the first 120 hours after Cycle 1 of MEC. Secondary endpoints included acute and delayed CR and SN rates, rates of nausea, vomiting, and safety.

RESULTS:

All casopitant doses that were tested significantly increased the proportion of patients with CR: The CR rates were 80.8% with casopitant 50 mg, 78.5% with casopitant 100 mg, and 84.2% with casopitant 150 mg compared with 69.4% in the control group (P = .0127); casopitant 150 mg was identified as the minimally effective dose. In exploratory analyses, single‐dose casopitant demonstrated a 79.2% CR rate, and once‐daily ondansetron plus casopitant produced an 83.5% CR rate. Vomiting rates in the first 5 days after MEC were reduced with casopitant‐containing regimens (from 23% to 10%‐16%). Rates of SN did not differ among treatment arms (range, 28%‐29%). Casopitant appeared to be well tolerated with no notable differences in overall adverse event frequency.

CONCLUSIONS:

Casopitant plus ond/dex was more effective than ond/dex alone for the prevention of CINV. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Comparative trial of oral granisetron and intravenous ondansetron in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Study Group of Granisetron

This multicentric randomized trial compared two strategies in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The antiemetic efficacy and side effects of oral granisetron, followed by metoclopramide, were compared to those of intravenous (IV) ondansetron followed by oral ondansetron. 198 chemonaive patients with breast cancer, treated with a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either oral granisetron 1 mg twice a day on day 1, followed by metoclopramide, 60 mg on day 2 and 3, or ondansetron, 8 mg IV on day 1, followed by ondansetron 8 mg tablet twice a day on day 2 and 3. Both treatments have shown similar control of acute emesis: complete response was achieved in 71% of granisetron group and 66% of ondansetron, and total response in respectively 49% and 53%. However, granisetron plus metoclopramide showed a trend towards better efficacy than oral ondansetron in the prevention of delayed emesis. Furthermore, during the overall study period (day 1 to 5), the percentage of complete responses in the group receiving oral granisetron followed by oral metoclopramide was significantly higher than in the group receiving ondansetron (53% versus 37%; p = 0.022). In conclusion, oral granisetron has shown similar efficacy as IV ondansetron in the prevention of acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral granisetron followed by metoclopramide seems more efficient than IV plus oral ondansetron in the prevention of delayed emesis.     

Aprepitant: a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life, and although the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT₃) receptor antagonists plus dexamethasone has significantly improved the control of acute CINV, delayed nausea and vomiting remain a significant clinical problem. Aprepitant (Emend^®, Merck) is the first agent available in the new drug class of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. When added to a standard regimen of a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, it improves the complete response rate of acute CINV. Aprepitant also improves the complete response of delayed CINV when used in combination with dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone. Based on these studies, new guidelines for the prevention of CINV have been developed for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The use of aprepitant in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy will await the review and analysis of recently completed Phase III trials. Aprepitant is a substrate, a moderate inhibitor and an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP2C9. Drug interactions should be monitored when aprepitant is coadministered with agents affected by CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 isoenzymes. The safety and efficacy of aprepitant has not been established in pediatric or adolescent patients, and aprepitant has not been evaluated in the treatment of patients with established nausea and vomiting. Future studies may consider the use of aprepitant with current and other new agents in moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, as well in the clinical settings of multiple-day chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.     

Prevention of delayed emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with acute emesis

The rates of delayed nausea and vomiting by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with previous experience of acute emesis are usually quite high. This is a pilot study aiming to evaluate the safety of a new antiemetic schedule to prevent delayed emesis in this subset of patients. During 5 consecutive cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, we evaluated 50 patients (15 males) who experienced acute emesis in the first cycle of treatment. The regimen for prevention of delayed emesis consisted of daily tropisetron (5 mg orally from d 2 to d 6 of each chemotherapeutic cycle) associated to ACTH-Depot (1 mg intramuscularly 24 and 68 h after the initiation of chemotherapy). In 77% of chemotherapy cycles, there was a total elimination of nausea and vomiting, whereas in the remaining 23% of cycles, there was a major response defined as ≤ 2 vomiting episodes per cycle or nausea grade 1 according to the WHO. The efficacy of the antiemetic regimen persisted during the entire treatment program without the appearance of toxic effects. The proposed antiemetic regimen is highly active in preventing delayed nausea and vomiting episodes in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Moreover, no toxic effects were observed. These promising results require confirmation by a randomized trial.     

Aprepitant: a substance P antagonist for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting

The episodes of nausea and vomiting which follow each cycle of chemotherapy are the most troublesome side effect experienced by cancer patients. Introduction of ondansetron was a definite therapeutic advance in treating chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with more effectiveness with corticosteroids. However, the protection remained largely limited to acute phase of CINV with little or no effect over delayed phase. Aprepitant, a drug that antagonizes the effect of substance P on neurokinin type 1 receptor showed promising results in controlling both phases of CINV. This drug is well absorbed orally with a t max of about four hours. The addition of aprepitant to ondansetron and dexamethasone was found to be superior to ondansetron and dexamethasone alone in clinical trials with patients taking high and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy. This drug also showed a good safety profile, but its inhibitory effect on CYP3A4 may result in clinically significant drug interactions needing dose modifications of co-administered drugs. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for CINV recommends the use of aprepitant with high and moderately emetogenic anticancer drugs. Results of ongoing clinical trials with aprepitant and other agents of this new class of antiemetics are awaited and may alleviate the sufferings of cancer patients.